Smolen: Shorter Major. This Alertable Call Tells
Smolen: Shorter Major. This Alertable Call Tells
Smolen: Shorter Major. This Alertable Call Tells
Smolen
Many players use Jacoby transfers are the combined hands: This is where Smolen helps. You
in response to an opening 1NT bid now jump to the three-level of your
from partner. It allows responder to Q8 shorter major. This Alertable call tells
show a five-card or longer major, A962 partner that you have four cards in
while allowing the strong hand – the K54 that major and five in the other. With
1NT opener – to declare, assuming A Q 10 7 the previous example hand, you’d
the opponents are not in the auction. jump to 3. This jump after opener’s
Allowing the strong hand to declare AK653 2 rebid would tell partner that you
is important. The 1NT bidder fre- K874 have four hearts and five spades. With
quently holds combinations of honors 873 three-card spade support, he would
(called tenaces in bridge lingo) that 4 bid 3, and you could raise to 4
are worth more tricks if the defenders or cuebid if you were interested in
lead into them than if the defenders If LHO leads the Q, you’re in big slam. Without a three-card spade fit,
lead through them. For example, if trouble. The ace will be over the king, partner would simply sign off in 3NT.
you hold the A Q, you’d like your and you’ll likely lose three diamond Either way, partner – the 1NT opener
left-hand opponent to lead a heart for tricks and a trump trick for down one. – declares.
you, but not your RHO. The problem is that partner’s K Example auctions:
Game-forcing hands that are 5–4 was vulnerable to attack. If partner Opener Responder
in the majors (five spades and four declared, however, he’d likely make 1NT 2 (1)
hearts or vice versa), however, are the contract since the K would be 2
(2)
3 (3)
difficult to describe in response to a protected. 4
(4)
Pass
strong (15–17 HCP) 1NT opening. Is there a way to avoid this
Transfers are a problem in this problem? The Smolen convention, (1) Stayman: do you have a four-card
situation because they risk making named for the late expert Mike major?
responder – the weak hand – declarer. Smolen, helps address this situation. (2) No.
Say you hold: It works like this: instead of using (3) Smolen: I have five hearts and
transfers for hands that are 5-4 in the four spades.
A K 6 5 3 K 8 7 4 8 7 3 4. (4) I have three hearts and prefer this
majors, it uses Stayman (2). After
Partner opens 1NT. You respond partner’s 1NT opening, you bid 2. to 3NT.
2, a Jacoby transfer to spades, and If partner pleasantly surprises you by
partner dutifully bids 2. You have bidding a major, you’ll simply jump Opener Responder
enough strength to force to game, and to four of that major, and partner will 1NT 2 (1)
you have a four-card suit you haven’t declare. But what if partner doesn’t 2
(2)
3 (3)
mentioned yet, so you bid it: 3. have a four-card major? He’ll respond 3NT
(4)
Pass
Partner raises you to 4. to your Stayman inquiry with 2. (1) Four-card major?
This is a perfectly good auction, but Now what? Could you still have a (2) No.
there is a risk. You are the declarer in 5–3 major-suit fit? Is there a way to (3) Five spades, four hearts.
this case, not partner. Suppose these find out? (4) I don’t have a fit for spades. r
44 Bridge Bulletin