Iare Asp Lecture Notes
Iare Asp Lecture Notes
Iare Asp Lecture Notes
ON
AEROSPACE PROPULSION
M.Tech I Semester
Prepared by
AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
(Autonomous)
Dundigal, Hyderabad, Telangana -500 043
IARE
UNIT – I
AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Propulsion
Propulsion (Lat. pro-pellere, push forward) is making a body to move (against natural forces),
i.e. fighting against the natural tendency of relative-motion to decay. Motion is relative to an
environment. Sometimes, propulsion is identified with thrust, the force pushing a body to move
against natural forces, and one might say that propulsion is thrust (but thrust not necessary
implies motion, as when pushing against a wall; on the other hand, propulsion implies thrust).
Sometimes a distinction is made from propulsion (pushing) to traction (pulling), but, leaving
aside internal stresses in the system (compression in the first case and tension in the latter),
push and pull motions produces the same effect: making a body to move against natural forces.
In other occasions 'traction' is restricted to propulsion by shear forces on solid surfaces.
The special case of creating aerodynamic thrust to just balance gravitational attraction of a
vehicle without solid contact (e.g. hovering helicopters, hovering VTOL-aircraft, hovering
rockets, hovering hovercraft...), is often included as propulsion (it is usually based on the same
engine), though its propulsion efficiency is zero.
Operational envelopes
Each engine type will operate only within a certain range of altitudes and Mach numbers
(velocities). Similar limitations in velocity and altitude exist for airframes. It is necessary,
therefore, to match airframe and propulsion system capabilities.
Figure1.1 shows the approximate velocity and altitude limits, or corridor of flight, within which
airlift vehicles can operate. The corridor is bounded by a lift limit, a temperature limit, ·and an
aerodynamic force limit. The lift limit is determined by the maximum level-flight altitude at a
given velocity. The temperature limit is set by the structural thermal limits of the material used
in construction of the · aircraft. At any given altitude, the maximum velocity attained is
temperature-limited by aerodynamic heating effects. At lower altitudes, velocity is limited by
aerodynamic force loads rather than by temperature.
The operating regions of all aircraft lie within the flight corridor. The operating region of a
particular aircraft within the corridor is determined by aircraft design, but it is a very small
portion of the overall corridor. Superimposed on "the flight corridor in Fig.1.1 are the
operational envelopes of various powered aircraft. The operational limits of each propulsion
system are determined by limitations of the components of the propulsion system and are
shown in Fig. 1.2.
Fig.1.1: Flight limits.
1. turbojet
2. turbofan
3. turboprop
4. turboshaft
5. ramjet
6. scramjet
Gas Generator
The "heart" of a gas turbine type of engine is the gas generator. A schematic diagram of a gas
generator is shown in Fig. 1.3. The compressor, combustor, and turbine are the major
components of the gas generator which is common to the turbojet, turbofan, turboprop, and
turboshaft engines. The purpose of a gas generator is to supply high-temperature and high-
pressure gas.
By adding an inlet and a nozzle to the gas generator, a turbojet engine can be constructed. A
schematic diagram of a afterburner is shown Fig. 1.4.The thrust of a turbojet is developed by
compressing air in the inlet and compressor, mixing the air with fuel and burning in the
combustor, and expanding the gas stream through the turbine and nozzle. The expansion of gas
through the turbine supplies the power to turn the compressor. The net thrust delivered by the
engine is the result of converting internal energy to kinetic energy.
Fig.1.5: (a) Ideal turbojet cycle (without afterburning). (b) Ideal turbojet cycle with
afterburning
Afterburning: used when the aircraft needs a substantial increment in thrust such as to
accelerate and cruise at supersonic speeds. Since the air-fuel ratio in gas turbine engines are
much greater than the stoichiometric values, there is sufficient amount of air available for
combustion at the turbine exit. There are no rotating components like a turbine in the
afterburner; the temperatures can be taken too much higher values than that at turbine entry.
Fig.1.6: Variation of flow properties across turbojet engine
The pressure, temperature, and velocity variations through a jet engine are shown in Fig. 1.6. In
the compressor section, the pressure and temperature increase as a result of work being done on
the air. The temperature of the gas is further increased by burning in the combustor. In the
turbine section, energy is being removed from the gas stream and converted to shaft power to
turn the compressor. The energy is removed by an expansion process which results in a
decrease of temperature and pressure. In the nozzle, the gas stream is further expanded to
produce a high exit kinetic energy. All the sections of the engine must operate in such a way as
to efficiently produce the greatest amount of thrust for a minimum of weight.
Turbo fan engine
The turbofan engine consists of an inlet, fan, gas generator, and nozzle. A schematic diagram of
a turbofan is shown in Fig. 17. In the turbofan, a portion of the turbine work is used to supply
power to the fan. Generally the turbofan engine is more economical and efficient than the
turbojet engine in a limited realm of flight. The thrust specific fuel consumption (TSFC or fuel
mass flow rate per unit thrust) is lower for turbofans and indicates a more economical
operation. The turbofan also accelerates a larger mass of air to a lower velocity than a turbojet
for a higher propulsive efficiency. The frontal area of a turbofan is quite large compared to that
of a turbojet, and for this reason more drag and more weight result. The fan diameter is also
limited aerodynamically when compressibility -effects occur.
Bypass ratio
The bypass ratio (BPR) of a turbofan engine is the ratio between the mass flow rates of the
bypass stream to the mass flow rate entering the core. A 10:1 bypass ratio, for example, means
that 10 kg of air passes through the bypass duct for every 1 kg of air passing through the core.
The Turboprop and Turboshaft engine
A gas generator that drives a propeller is a turboprop engine. The expansion of gas through the
turbine supplies the energy required to turn the propeller. A schematic diagram of the turboprop
is shown in Fig. 1.8. The Turboshaft engine is similar to the turboprop except that power is
supplied to a shaft rather than a propeller. The turboshaft engine is used quite extensively for
supplying power for helicopters. The turboprop engine may find application in VTOL (vertical
takeoff and landing) transporters. The limitations and advantages of the turboprop are those of
the propeller. For low-speed flight and, short-field takeoff, the propeller has a performance
advantage. At speeds approaching the speed of sound, compressibility effects set in and the
propeller loses its aerodynamic efficiency. Due to the rotation of the propeller, the propeller tip
will approach the speed of sound before the vehicle approaches the speed of sound. This
compressibility effect when one approaches the speed of sound limits the design of helicopter
rotors and propellers. At high subsonic speeds, the turbofan engine will have a better
aerodynamic performance than the turboprop since the turbofan is essentially a ducted
turboprop. Putting a duct or shroud around a propeller increases its aerodynamic performance.
The ramjet engine consists of an inlet, a combustion zone, and a nozzle. A schematic diagram
of a ramjet is shown in Fig. 1.9. The ramjet does not have the compressor and turbine as the
turbojet does. Air enters the inlet where it is compressed and then enters the combustion zone
where it is mixed with the fuel and burned. The hot gases are then expelled through the nozzle,
developing thrust. The operation of the ramjet depends upon the inlet to decelerate the incoming
air to raise the pressure in the combustion zone. The pressure rise makes it possible for the
ramjet to operate. The higher the velocity of the incoming air, the greater the pressure rise. It is
for this reason that the ramjet operates best at high supersonic velocities. At subsonic velocities,
the ramjet is inefficient, and to start the ramjet, air at a relatively higher velocity must enter the
inlet.
The combustion process in an ordinary ramjet takes place at low subsonic velocities. At high
supersonic flight velocities, a very large pressure rise is developed that is more than sufficient
to support operation of the ramjet. Also, if the inlet has to decelerate a supersonic high-velocity
airstream to a subsonic velocity, large pressure losses can result. The deceleration process also
produces a temperature rise, and at some limiting flight speed, the temperature will approach
the limit set by the wall materials and cooling methods. Thus when the temperature increase
due to deceleration reaches the limit, it may not be possible to burn fuel in the airstream.
The ramjet with supersonic combustion is known as the scramjet (supersonic combustion
ramjet). By using a supersonic combustion process, the temperature rise and pressure loss due
to deceleration in the inlet can be reduced.
The scramjet engine belongs to the family of Brayton cycles, which consist of two adiabatic
and two constant-pressure processes. A simplified schematic of a scramjet equipped vehicle is
shown above Fig.1.10.
Station 0 represents the free-stream condition.
Station 2.1 represents the entrance into the isolator section. The role of the isolator is to
separate the inlet from the adverse effects of a pressure rise that is due to
combustion in the combustion chamber. The presence of a shock train in the
isolator further compresses the air before arriving at the combustion chamber.
Thermodynamically the isolator is not a desirable component, because it is a
source of additional pressure losses, increases the engine cooling loads, and adds
to the engine weight. However, operationally it is needed to include a shock train
that adjusts such that it fulfills the role just described.
Station 3 is the combustion chamber entrance. Unlike the turbojet engine cycle, in which
the air compression ratio is controlled by the compressor settings, in a fixed-
geometry scramjet the pressure at the combustion chamber entrance varies over
a large range.
Station 10 is the exit from the nozzle; because of the large expansion ratios the entire aft
part of the vehicle may be part of the engine nozzle.
1. The flow is steady within the control volume; thus all the properties within the control
do not change with time.
2. The external flow is reversible; thus the pressures and velocities are constant over the
control surface except over the exhaust area Pe of the engine.
Fig.1.12: Generalized thrust producing device.
The engine performance is described by different efficiency definitions, thrust and the fuel
consumption. The efficiency definitions that we shall now be discussing are applicable to an
engine with a single propellant stream (turbojets or ramjets). For other types of jet engines
(turbofan, turboprop) the equations need to be appropriately modified.
Thermal efficiency: The ratio of the rate of production of propellant kinetic energy to the total
energy consumption rate.
For a turboprop or turboshaft engine, the output is largely shaft power. In this case,
Propulsion efficiency: The ratio of thrust power to the rate of production of propellant kinetic
energy. The propulsive efficiency ηp can be defined as the ratio of the useful propulsive energy
or thrust power (F. u) to the sum of that energy and the unused kinetic energy of the jet.
Specific Thrust
Specific thrust is a term used in gas turbine engineering to show the relative thrust per air mass
flow rate of a jet engine (e.g. turbojet, turbofan, etc.) and is defined as the ratio: net thrust/total
intake airflow.
First, it is an indication of engine efficiency. Two different engines have different values of
specific thrust. The engine with the higher value of specific thrust is more efficient because it
produces more thrust for the same amount of airflow.
It gives us an easy way to "size" an engine during preliminary analysis. The result of our
thermodynamic analysis is a certain value of specific thrust. The aircraft drag defines the
required value of thrust. Dividing the thrust required by the specific thrust tells us how much
airflow our engine must produce and this determines the physical size of the engine.
Specific impulse
Specific impulse (usually abbreviated Isp) is a measure of how effectively a rocket uses
propellant or jet engine uses fuel. By definition, it is the total impulse (or change in momentum)
delivered per unit of propellant consumed.
TSFC or SFC for thrust engines (e.g. turbojets, turbofans, ramjets, rocket engines, etc.) is the
mass of fuel needed to provide the net thrust for a given period.SFC varies with throttle setting,
altitude and climate. For jet engines, flight speed also has a significant effect upon SFC; SFC is
roughly proportional to air speed.
Component performance
This efficiency can be related to the total pressure ratio (πd) and Mach number
Compressor/fan performance
Compressors are to a high degree of approximation, adiabatic. Compressor performance is
evaluated using the isentropic efficiency.
The isentropic efficiency is thus a function of the total pressure ratio and the total temperature
ratio.
Combustion chamber performance
In a combustion chamber (or burner), there are two possibilities of losses, incomplete
combustion and total pressure losses.
Combustion efficiency can be defined by carrying out an energy balance across the
combustor.
Two different values of specific heat at constant pressure: one for fluid upstream of the
combustor and the other for fluid downstream of the combustor
Turbine performance
The flow in a turbine is also assumed to be adiabatic, though in actual engines there could be
turbine blade cooling. Isentropic efficiency of the turbine is defined in a manner similar to that
of the compressor.
Nozzle performance
The flow in the nozzle is also adiabatic, however losses in a nozzle could occur due to
incomplete expansion process (under or over-expansion). Friction may reduce the isentropic
efficiency.
The propeller is pitch controlled to be suitable for a wider range of satisfactory applications.
If the shaft of a free turbine is used to drive something other than an aircraft propeller, the
engine is called a turboshaft engine. This is one of the turboshaft engines that will be discussed
later in this chapter. Turboshaft engines are similar to turboprop engines, except that the hot
gases are expanded to a lower pressure in the turbine, thus providing greater shaft power and
low exhaust velocity.
Examples of turboshaft engines are those used in helicopters. Now, let us discuss the
advantages of turboprop engines:
1. Turboprops have high fuel efficiency, even greater than turbofan engines. This is due to
the small amount of air flow burned inside the engine. Turboprop engines can then
generate a lot of thrust at low fuel consumption.
2. Turboprop engines may find application in vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL). The
Osprey V-22 aircraft as shown in Figure 6.5 is one of the famous VTOL aircraft that is
powered by a turboprop engine.
3. Turboprop engines have high takeoff thrust that enables aircraft to have a short field
takeoff.
4. They have the highest propulsive efficiency for flight speeds of 400 mph compared to
turbofan and turbojet engines.
However, turboprop engines have several disadvantages:
1. The noise and vibration produced by the propeller is a significant drawback.
2. Turboprop engines are limited to subsonic flights (< 400 mph) and low altitudes
(below30, 000 ft).
3. The propeller and its pitch control mechanism as well as the power turbine contribute
additional weight, so the turboprop engine may be 1.5 times as heavy as a conventional
turbojet of the same gas generator size.
Problem 1: A gas turbine operating at a pressure ratio of 11.314 produces zero net work output
when 473.35 kJ of heat is added per kg of air. If the inlet air temperature is 300 K and the
turbine efficiency if 71%, find the compressor efficiency.
Maximum thrust is obtained by designing the air intake to transform kinetic energy (i.e., the
velocity of the flow as it arrives in front of the air intake) into potential energy (the pressure
after the diffuser, at the engine input) with the best possible efficiency. Efficiency is a parameter
that is calculated by taking the ratio of the total pressure in front of the engine to that of the
upstream flow. This thrust is maximum if the air intake captures just what the engine needs for
each flight configuration and provides the engine input with a flow of good homogeneity (low
distortion) to ensure correct engine operation, which is essential for turbojets. Minimum drag is
obtained with air intakes that are dimensioned to just what the engine needs (critical regime) and
the design Mach number (Shock-on-lip Mach number). Careful attention is paid to the side
walls and cowls in light of the small variations in angle of attack and yaw angle about the flight
configurations.
The performance should not be prejudice in the presence of an incidence angle or yaw. It is
useful to observe that the requirement that the flow is uniform before the compressor could be
more important than to have small total pressure loss. The inlet is essentially a duct where the
air flows in stationary conditions. it is designed according to rules of gas dynamics; since such
laws have different implications depending on how the flow enters in the duct, if in supersonic
or subsonic conditions, the main classification of distinguishes between:
1. Subsonic inlet;
2. Supersonic inlet
SUBSONIC INTAKES
Subsonic intakes are found in the turbojet or turbofan engines powering most of the present
civil transports. The surface of the inlet is a continuous smooth curve where the very front (most
upstream portion) is called the inlet lip. A subsonic aircraft has an inlet with a relatively thick
lip. Concerning turboprop engines, the intakes are much complicated by the propeller and
gearbox at the inlet to the engine. Subsonic inlets have fixed geometry, although inlets for some
high bypass ratio turbofan engines are designed with blow-in-doors. These doors are spring-
loaded parts installed in the perimeter of the inlet duct designed to deliver additional air to the
aero engine during takeoff and climb conditions when the highest thrust is needed and the
aircraft speed is low.
The most common type of subsonic intake is the pitot intake. This type of intakes makes the
fullest use of ram due to forward speed, and suffers the minimum loss of ram pressure with
changes of aircraft altitude. However, as sonic speed is approached, the efficiency of this type
of air intake begins to fall because of the formation of a shock wave at the intake lip. It consists
of a simple forward entry hole with a cowl lip.
The three major types of pitot intakes as shown in Fig 2.1 are as follows
1. Podded intakes
2. Integrated intake
3. Flush intakes.
Fig. 2.1: Types of pitot intakes: (a) podded pitot, (b) integrated pitot, and (c) flush pitot.
Podded intake is common in transport aircraft. The integrated intake is used in combat (military)
aircraft. The flush intake is usually used in missiles since they can be more readily
accommodated into missile airframes.
Fig. 2.2: Flow characteristics of podded intakes: (a) ground run, (b) climb, (c)
high- speed cruise, and (d) top speed.
Subsonic inlet performance
Depending on the flight speed and the mass flow demanded by the engine, the inlet might have
to operate with a wide range of incident stream conditions. Fig 2.3 a and b show the
performances of subsonic intake during two typical subsonic conditions, takeoff and cruise,
respectively. The first illustrates the stream tube, while the second depicts the pressure and
speed variation and the third is a temperature–entropy diagram.
The flow in intake is identified by three states, namely far upstream that is denoted as (∞), at the
duct entry denoted by (1) and at the engine face denoted by (2). The flow outside the engine
(from state ∞ to 1) is an isentropic one, where no losses are associated with the total
temperature and pressure. For high speed, or cruise condition (Figure2.3b), the stream tube will
have a divergent shape and following conditions can be stated:
Fig. 2.3: Subsonic inlet during (a) takeoff and (b) cruise.
During low speed high-thrust operation (e.g., during takeoff and climb), as shown in Figure
2.3a,the same engine will demand more mass flow and the air stream upstream the intake will b
accelerated. The stream tube will have a converging shape and the following conditions are
satisfied:
For both cases of takeoff and cruise, there will be internal diffusion within the intake up to the
engine face. The static pressure will rise and the air speed will be reduced. The total pressure
will also decrease owing to skin friction while the total temperature remains unchanged, as the
flow through diffuser is adiabatic. Thus, for both takeoff and cruise conditions
Since the inlet speed to the engine (compressor/fan) should be nearly constant for different
operating conditions, then
If this pressure increase is too large, the diffuser may stall due to boundary layer separation.
Stalling usually reduces the stagnation pressure of the stream as a whole. Conversely, for cruise
conditions (Fig.2.3b) to avoid separation or to have a less severe loading on the boundary layer,
it is recommended to have a low velocity ratio (u1/u∞) and consequently less internal pressure
rise. Therefore, the inlet area is often chosen so as to minimize external acceleration during
takeoff with the result that external deceleration occurs during level-cruise operation. Under
these conditions the ―upstream capture area‖ A∞ is less than the inlet area A1, and some flow is
spilled over the inlet.
Supersonic intakes
The design of inlet systems for supersonic aircraft is a highly complex matter involving
engineering trade-offs between efficiency, complexity, weight, and cost. A typical supersonic
intake is made up of a supersonic diffuser, in which the flow is decelerated by a combination
shocks and diffuse compression, and a subsonic diffuser, which reduces the Mach number from
high subsonic value after the last shock to the value acceptable to the engine. Subsonic intakes
that have thick lip are quite unsuitable for supersonic speeds.
The reason is that a normal shock wave ahead of the intake is generated, which will yield a very
sharp static pressure rise without change of flow direction and correspondingly big velocity
reduction. The adiabatic efficiency of compression through a normal shock wave is very low as
compared with oblique shocks.
At Mach 2.0 in the stratosphere adiabatic efficiency would be about 80% or less for normal
shock waves, whereas its value will be about 95% or even more for an intake designed for
oblique shocks.
Flight at supersonic speeds complicates the diffuser design for the following reasons
1. The existence of shock waves that lead to large decrease in stagnation pressure even in
the absence of viscous effects.
2. The large variation in capture stream tube area between subsonic and supersonic flight
for a given engine, as much as a factor of four between M∞ = 1 and M∞ = 3.
3. As M∞ increases, the inlet compression ratio becomes a larger fraction of the overall
cycle compression ratios and as a result, the specific thrust becomes more sensitive to
diffuser pressure ratio.
4. It must operate efficiently both during the subsonic flight phases (takeoff, climb, and
subsonic cruise) and at supersonic design speed.
The axisymmetric intakes use axisymmetric central cone to decelerate the flow down to
subsonic speeds. The two-dimensional inlet has rectangular cross sections as found in the F-14
and F-15 fighter aircraft.
For variable geometry axisymmetric intakes, the central cone may move fore-and-aft to adjust
the intake area. Alternatively, the inlet area is adjusted in the case of rectangular section through
hinged flaps (or ramps) that may change its angles. For flight at Mach numbers much beyond
1.6, variable geometry features must be incorporated in the inlet to achieve high inlet pressure
recoveries together with low external drag.
This condition is identified as the full flow [6] or the critical flow [5]. This condition depends
on the Mach number, angle of the forebody and the position of the tip. In this case, the shock
angle θ is equal to the angle subtended by lip at the apex of the body and corresponds to the
maximum possible flow through the intake.
Subcritical operation
At Mach numbers (or speeds) below the value of the critical (design) value described above,
the mass flow is less than that at the critical condition and the normal shock wave occurs in
front of the cowl lip and this case is identified as subcritical. It is to be noted here that
Supercritical operation
If the at air speeds is greater than the design value, then the oblique shock will impinge inside
the cowl lip and the normal shock will move to the diverging section. This type of operation is
referred to as the supercritical operation.
Fig. 2.6: Types of flow in an external compression intake.
Over-speeding
Consider an intake designed for a Mach number of 1.7. The design point for this intake,
represented by the point B in this plot, has been shown in Fig. 2.6.
One of the methods of starting the intake is by increasing the free-stream Mach number.
Referring Fig. 2.6, conditions are modified so as to move the operating point from B to C. Once
at C the intake starts and the expected shock system is developed. Then again the free-stream
flow is decelerated to reach the design point B, while retaining the appropriate shockstructure.
This method of starting the intake is called Over-speeding. It is the simplest method for starting
the intake from the point of view of design complexity as it does not require any modifications
to the intake aircraft.
Fig 2.8: Method of Over-speeding and Area Variation for Starting an Intake
However, from Fig. 2.8, it can be seen that the amount of over-speeding required even for
modest area ratios is very high. Hence, this method can best be employed for intakes aircrafts
designed for a very low supersonic Mach number. Also, as has been discussed there exists a
limiting area ratio (about 1.66) beyond which the intake cannot be started even if accelerated it
to an infinitely high Mach number.
Hence the method of over-speeding cannot be used for intakes which are designed for Mach
numbers beyond 2. Another problem with this method is that the intake remains in the non-
started condition for quite some time in the supersonic flight regime, which is not acceptable.
Use of the method of over-speeding has not been reported on any aircraft and its study is
primarily of academic interest. As a result of its deficiencies, other methods need to be explored
for overcoming the starting problem.
Variable area
Referring again to Fig. 2.6, we can see that another way of modifying the conditions at point B
so as to enable flow starting is by varying the area ratio, without over-speeding. The area ratio
at B can be reduced so as to reach point A. Once the intake starts at point A, the area ratio can
again be modified to operate at the design point. This method is referred to as Variation
of Intake Geometry and can be used for starting intakes designed even for high Mach numbers.
However, it does require complex mechanisms for varying the area ratio. This adds to cost,
weight and complexity. This method can further be categorized depending on the mechanism of
modifying the intake geometry.
c) Porous bleed
Another method employed for starting intakes is the use of porosity in the cowl. By doing this,
the back-pressure at the throat is reduced so that, the normal shock can be positioned. Also, the
use of bleed allows additional flow spillage without creating adverse conditions at the intake
entry. The effective reduction in back pressure is dictated by the amount of mass removed using
porous bleed and thus by the size and density of the holes used. Use of porosity in a 2D intake
at the wedge has been experimentally studied.
The total pressure recovery as well as drag increase as a function of Mach number. These have
been however found to be within limits, when compared with a solid wedge intake. Other
factors that dictate the performance characteristics include the amount of bleed and its location.
Cubbison, et al has experimentally studied the effects of variation in the location and bleed
amount on the performance in axisymmetric intakes.
It has been reported that the best starting and stability characteristics were obtained when
porosity was located just downstream of the terminal shock. Also, the intake performance in
terms of pressure recovery has been reported to have improved with an increase in bleed
percentage, though at the cost of increased inlet flow distortion.
Thus, it is seen that the use of porosity does enhance the overall performance of the intake,
particularly under off-design conditions. Also, this method does not require any of the
complicated and weight intensive equipment as needed in case of variable geometry. However,
one of the major disadvantages associated with this method is the flow distortion, and this has
been the major deterrent for most applications. Also, there are always losses related to mass
flow even after the intake has started.
This leads to a lower critical performance. An improvement suggested is the use of variable
bleed by controlling the bleed plenum exit area. This however comes at the cost of added
complexity.
Combustion chamber
The combustion process in aircraft engines and gas turbines is a heat addition process to the
compressed air in the combustor or burner. Thus, the combustion is a direct-fired air heater in
which fuel is burned. The combustor is situated between the compressor and turbine, where it
accepts air from the compressor and delivers it at elevated temperature to the turbine.
The number of combustion chambers varies from 7 to 16 per engine. The can-type combustion
chamber is typical of the type used on both centrifugal and axial-flow engines. It is particularly
well suited for the centrifugal compressor engine since the air leaving the compressor is already
divided into equal portions as it leaves the diffuser vanes. It is then a simple matter to duct the
air from the diffuser into the respective combustion chambers arranged radially around the axis
of the engine.
The advantages of tubular type are as follows:
Mechanically robust
Fuel flow and airflow patterns are easily matched
Rig testing necessitates only a small fraction of total engine air mass flow
Easy replacement for maintenance.
Cannular combustion chambers must have fuel drain valves in two or more of the
bottom chambers. This ensures drainage of residual fuel to prevent its being burned at the next
start. The flow of air through the holes and louvers of the can-annular system is almost identical
to the flow through other types of burners. Reverse-flow combustors are mostly of the can-
annular type. Reverse-flow combustors make the engine more compact.
Usually, enough space is left between the outer liner wall and the combustion chamber
housing to permit the flow of cooling air from the compressor. Normally, this type is used in
many engines using axial-flow compressor and also others incorporating dual type compressors
(combinations of axial flow and centrifugal flow). Currently, most aero engines use annular
type combustors.
Fig 2.8: Annular type combustor.
Disadvantages
o Serious buckling problem on outer liner.
o Rig testing necessitates full engine air mass flow.
INLET PERFORMANCE
Depending on the flight speed and the mass flow demanded by the engine, the inlet might have
to operate with a wide range of incident stream conditions. Figures 2.9(a) and (b) show the
performances of subsonic intake during two typical subsonic conditions, take-off and cruise,
respectively.
For each operating condition, three plots are given in Figure 2.9. The first illustrates the stream
tube, while the second depicts the pressure and speed variation and the third is a temperature–
entropy diagram. The flow in intake is identified by three states, namely far upstream that is
denoted as (∞), at the duct entry denoted by (1) and at the engine face denoted by (2). The flow
outside the engine (from state ∞ to 1) is an isentropic one, where no losses are associated with
the total temperature and pressure. For high speed, or cruise condition, the stream tube will
have a divergent shape and following conditions can be stated:
During low speed high-thrust operation (e.g., during takeoff and climb), as shown in Figure ,
the same engine will demand more mass flow and the air stream upstream the intake will be
accelerated. The stream tube will have a converging shape and the following conditions are
satisfied:
For both cases of takeoff and cruise, there will be internal diffusion within the intake up to the
engine face. The static pressure will rise and the air speed will be reduced. The total pressure
will also decrease owing to skin friction while the total temperature remains unchanged, as the
flow through diffuser is adiabatic. Thus, for both take-off and cruise conditions
Since the inlet speed to the engine (compressor/fan) should be nearly constant for different
operating conditions, then
If this pressure increase is too large, the diffuser may stall due to boundary layer separation.
Stalling usually reduces the stagnation pressure of the stream as a whole. Conversely, for cruise
conditions to avoid separation or to have a less severe loading on the boundary layer, it is
recommended to have a low velocity ratio (u1/u∞) and consequently less internal pressure rise.
Therefore, the inlet area is often chosen so as to minimize external acceleration during take-off
with the result that external deceleration occurs during level-cruise operation. Under these
conditions the ―upstream capture area‖ A∞ is less than the inlet area A1, and some flow
is spilled over the inlet.
Fig 2.9: Subsonic inlet during (a) takeoff and (b) cruise
The serious problem is the change in M∞ from zero at take-off to about 0.8 at cruise. If
optimized for the M∞ = 0.8 cruise, the inlet would have a thin lip to minimize the increase in
Mach number as the flow is divided. However, this inlet would separate badly on the inside at
take-off and low subsonic conditions because the turn around the sharp lip would impose severe
pressure gradients. To compromise, the lip is rounded making it less sensitive to flow angle, but
incurring some loss due to separation in the exterior flow. When fully developed a good inlet
will produce a pressure recovery P02/P0a = 0.95–0.97 at its optimum condition.
Example 1 Prove that the capture area (A ∞) for a subsonic diffuser is related to the free stream
Mach number (M∞) by the relation:
Where
A turbofan engine during ground ingests airflow at the rate of m˙∞ = 500 kg/s through an inlet
area (A1) of 3.0 m2. If the ambient conditions (T∞, P∞) are 288 K and 100 kPa, respectively,
calculate the area ratio (A∞/A1) for different free stream Mach numbers. What is the value of
the Mach number where the capture area is equal to the inlet area? Draw the air stream tube for
different Mach numbers.
Solution: The mass flow rate is
From (b), the capture area is equal to the engine inlet area (A ∞/A1 = 1) when M∞ = 0.405. From
relation (b), the following table is constructed:
PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
Two parameters will be discussed here:
1. Isentropic efficiency (ηd)
2. Stagnation pressure ratio (rd)
Fig 2.10: Stream tubes for different free stream Mach numbers
1. Isentropic efficiency (ηd)
The isentropic efficiency of the intake ηd is a static-to-total efficiency and as previously
defined, it is a measure for the losses from the far upstream conditions to the engine face. The
efficiency is then expressed by the following relation (refer to Figure 2.9a):
Thus if the isentropic efficiency is known, the pressure recovery can be obtained from
Equation, while if the pressure recovery is known, the diffuser efficiency can be determined
from Equation 9.4. However, since the flow upstream of the intake is isentropic, then all the
losses are encountered inside the intake, or from state (1) to state (2). In some cases, the
efficiency is defined for the internal part of diffuser (η d). In this case, the diffuser efficiency is
defined as
Example 2 Consider the turbofan engine described in Example 1 during flight at a Mach
number of 0.9 and altitude of 11 km where the ambient temperature and pressure are
respectively −56.5◦C and 22.632 kPa. The mass ingested into the engine is now 235 kg/s. If the
diffuser efficiency is 0.9 and the Mach number at the fan face is 0.45, calculate the following:
1. The capture area
2. The static pressures at the inlet and fan face
3. The air speed at the same stations as above
4. The diffuser pressure recovery factor
Solution:
1. The ambient static temperature is T∞ = −56.5 + 273 = 216.5 K
The free stream speed is u∞ = M∞ √γ RT∞ = 271.6 m/s
The free stream density ρ∞ = P∞/RT∞ = 0.3479
kg/m3 The capture area is A∞ = ˙m/ρ∞u∞ = 2.486 m2
Which is smaller than the inlet area?
2. To calculate the static pressures at states (1) and (2) two methods may be used, namely,
(a) Gas dynamics tables
(b) Isentropic relations
Fig 2.11: Efficiency of inlets of turboprop engine. (Courtesy of John Seddon [6])
The left-hand side is known, and the Mach number M1 is unknown, which can be determined
iteratively. From M1 determine T1
TURBOPROP INLETS
The intake for turboprop engines is much complicated due to the bulk gearbox. However, an
aerodynamically efficient turboprop intake can be achieved by use of a ducted spinner.
Improvement of intake performance is achieved by choosing large entry area. In addition,
minimum cylindrical roots are encased in fairings of low thickness/chord, which form the
structural members supporting the spinner cowl. The efficiency of the intake, defined as the
ratio between the difference between the static pressure at the engine face and the free stream
value to the dynamic pressure is plotted versus the ratio between the capture area and the duct
entry.
SUPERSONIC INTAKES
The design of inlet systems for supersonic aircraft is a highly complex matter involving
engineering trade-offs between efficiency, complexity, weight, and cost. A typical supersonic
intake is made up of a supersonic diffuser, in which the flow is decelerated by a combination of
shocks and diffuse compression, and a subsonic diffuser, which reduces the Mach number from
high subsonic value after the last shock to the value acceptable to the engine. Subsonic intakes
that have thick lip are quite unsuitable for supersonic speeds. The reason is that a normal shock
wave ahead of the intake is generated, which will yield a very sharp static pressure rise without
change of flow direction and correspondingly big velocity reduction. The adiabatic efficiency
of compression through a normal shock wave is very low as compared with oblique shocks. At
Mach 2.0 in the stratosphere adiabatic efficiency would be about 80% or less for normal shock
waves, whereas its value will be about 95% or even more for an intake designed for oblique
shocks.
Flight at supersonic speeds complicates the diffuser design for the following reasons:
1. The existence of shock waves that lead to large decrease in stagnation pressure even in
the absence of viscous effects.
2. The large variation in capture stream tube area between subsonic and supersonic flight
for a given engine, as much as a factor of four between M∞ = 1 and M∞ = 3.
3. As M∞ increases, the inlet compression ratio becomes a larger fraction of the overall
cycle compression ratios and as a result, the specific thrust becomes more sensitive to
diffuser pressure ratio.
4. It must operate efficiently both during the subsonic flight phases (takeoff, climb, and
subsonic cruise) and at supersonic design speed.
Generally, supersonic intake may be classified as follows.
I. Axisymmetric or two-dimensional intakes
The axisymmetric intakes use axisymmetric central cone to shock the flow down to subsonic
speeds. The two-dimensional inlets have rectangular cross sections as found in the F-14 and F-
15 fighter aircraft.
II. Variable or fixed geometry
For variable geometry axisymmetric intakes, the central cone may move fore-and-aft to adjust
the intake area. Alternatively, the inlet area is adjusted in the case of rectangular section
through hinged flaps (or ramps) that may change its angles. For flight at Mach numbers much
beyond 1.6, variable geometry features must be incorporated in the inlet to achieve high inlet
pressure recoveries together with low external drag. The General Dynamics F-111 airplane has
a quarter-round inlet equipped with a translating center body or spike. The inlet is bounded on
the top by the wing and on one side by the fuselage. An installation of this type is often referred
to as an ―armpit‖ inlet. The spike automatically translates fore and aft as the Mach
number changes. The throat area of the inlet also varies with Mach number. This is
accomplished by expansion and contraction of the rear part of the spike.
Fig 2.15: Intakes for military aircrafts: (a) F5D-1 Sky lancer, (b) MIG-25, (c) F-104, (d) F-89,
(e) MIG-FMI and (f) F-16-A.
Review of Gas Dynamic Relations for Normal and Oblique Shocks
Normal Shock Waves
For a normal shock wave, denoting the conditions upstream and downstream the shock by
Subscripts 1 and 2, respectively, the following relations give the downstream Mach number,
static temperature and pressure ratios, density ratio, and total pressure ratio across the shock:
The intake in this case is referred to as a two-shock intake. With a wedge, the flow after the
oblique shock wave is at constant Mach number and parallel to the wedge surface. With a cone
the flow behind the conical shock is itself conical, and the Mach number is constant along rays
from the apex and varies along streamline. Forebody intake is frequently used for
―external compression intake of wedge or cone form‖.
The capture area (Ac) for supersonic intakes is defined as the area enclosed by the leading edge,
or ―highlight,‖ of the intake cowl, including the cross-sectional area of the forebody in
that plane. The maximum flow ratio is achieved when the boundary of the free stream tube (A ∞)
arrives undisturbed at the lip. This means
This condition is identified as the full flow or the critical flow. This condition depends on the
Mach number, angle of the forebody and the position of the tip. In this case, the shock angle θ
is equal to the angle subtended by lip at the apex of the body and corresponds to the maximum
possible
Fig 2.17: Single oblique shock external compression intake
flow through the intake (Figure 2.18). This is the design point for constant area intake and the
goal of the variable area intake as to stay at that condition over the flight operating range. At
Mach numbers (or speeds) below the value of the critical (design) value described above, the
mass flow is less than that at the critical condition and the normal shock wave occurs in front of
the cowl lip and this case is identified as subcritical. It is to be noted here that
Moreover, the outer drag of the intake becomes very large and smaller pressure recovery is
obtained. If the at air speeds is greater than the design value, then the oblique shock will
impinge inside the cowl lip and the normal shock will move to the diverging section. This type
of operation is referred to as the supercritical operation. The two-shock intake is only
moderately good at Mach 2.0 and unlikely to be adequate at higher Mach numbers. The
principle of breaking down an external shock system can be extended to any desired number of
stages. The next step is the three-shock intake where two oblique shocks are followed by a
normal shock, where the double-wedge and double-cone are the archetypal forms (Figure 2.19).
Continuing the process of breaking down the external shock system, three or more oblique
shocks may be used ahead of the normal shock. For a system of (n−1) oblique shocks, the
pressure recovery factor will be
The flow in a nozzle is very rapid (and thus adiabatic to a first approximation), and with
very little frictional loses (because the flow is nearly one-dimensional, with a favorable pressure
gradient except if shock waves form, and nozzles are relatively short), so that the isentropic
model all along the nozzle is good enough for preliminary design. The nozzle is said to begin
where the chamber diameter begins to decrease (by the way, we assume the nozzle is
axisymmetric, i.e. with circular cross-sections, in spite that rectangular cross-sections, said two-
dimensional nozzles, are sometimes used, particularly for their ease of direction ability). The
meridian nozzle shape is irrelevant with the 1D isentropic models; the flow is only dependent
on cross-section area ratios.
Real nozzle flow departs from ideal (isentropic) flow on two aspects:
Non-adiabatic effects. There is a kind of heat addition by non-equilibrium radical-
species recombination and a heat removal by cooling the walls to keep the strength of
materials in long-duration rockets (e.g. operating temperature of cryogenic SR-25
rockets used in Space Shuttle is 3250 K, above steel vaporization temperature of 3100
K, not just melting, at 1700 K). Short-duration rockets (e.g. solid rockets) are not
actively cooled but rely on ablation; however, the nozzle-throat diameter cannot let
widen too much, and reinforced materials (e.g. carbon, silica) are used in the throat
region.
There is viscous dissipation within the boundary layer, and erosion of the walls, what
can be critical if the erosion widens the throat cross-section, greatly reducing exit-area
ratio and consequently thrust.
Axial exit speed is lower than calculated with the one-dimensional exit speed, when
radial outflow is accounted for.
We do not consider too small nozzles, say with chamber size <10 mm and neck size <1 mm,
where the effect of boundary layers become predominant.
Restricting the analysis to isentropic flows, the minimum set of input parameters to define the
propulsive properties of a nozzle (the thrust is the mass-flow-rate times the exit speed F mve )
are:
Nozzle size, given by the exit area, Ae; the actual area law, provided the entry area is
large enough that the entry speed can be neglected, only modifies the flow inside the
nozzle, but not the exit conditions.
Type of gas, defined with two independent properties for a perfect-gas model, that we
take as the thermal capacity ratio ≡cp/cv, and the gas constant, R≡Ru/M, and with
Ru=8.314 J/(mol·K) and M being the molar mass, which we avoid using, to reserve the
symbol M for the Mach number. If cp is given instead of , then we compute it from
≡Cp/Cv=Cp/(CpR), having used Mayer's relation, CpCvR.
Chamber (or entry) conditions: pc and Tc (a relatively large chamber cross-section, and
negligible speed, is assumed at the nozzle entry: Ac, Mc0). Instead of subscript 'c'
for chamber conditions, we will use 't' for total values because the energy conservation
implies that total temperature is invariant along the nozzle flow, and the non-dissipative
assumption implies that total pressure is also invariant, i.e. Tt=Tc and pt=pc.
Discharge conditions: p0, i.e. the environmental pressure (or back pressure), is the only
variable of importance (because pressure waves propagate at the local speed of sound
and quickly tend to force mechanical equilibrium, whereas the environmental
temperature T0 propagates by much slower heat-transfer physical mechanisms). Do not
confuse discharge pressure, p0, with exit pressure, pe, explained below.
Variable geometry nozzles
Variable area nozzle, which is sometimes identified as adjustable nozzle, is necessary for
engines fitted with afterburners. Generally, as the nozzle is reduced in area, the turbine inlet
temperature increases and the exhaust velocity and thrust increase. Three methods are available,
namely:
1. Central plug at nozzle outlet
2. Ejector type nozzle
3. IRIS nozzle
Thrust reversal
Stopping an aircraft after landing is not an easy problem due to the increases in its gross
weight, wing loadings and landing speeds. The amount of force required for stopping an aircraft
at a given distance after touchdown increases with the gross weight of the aircraft and the
square of the landing speed. The size of modern transport aircraft, which results in higher wing
loadings and increased landing speeds, makes the use of wheel brakes alone unsatisfactory for
routine operations. Moreover, in the cases of wet, icy, or snow-covered runways, the efficiency
of aircraft brakes may be reduced by the loss of adhesion between aircraft tire and the runway.
On turbojet engines, low-bypass turbofan engines, whether fitted with afterburner or
not, and mixed turbofan engines, the thrust reverser is achieved by reversing the exhaust gas
flow (hot stream). On high-bypass ratio turbofan engines, reverse thrust is achieved by
reversing the fan (cold stream) airflow. Mostly, in this case it is not necessary to reverse the hot
stream as the majority of the engine thrust is derived from the fan, although some engines use
both systems.
A good thrust reverser must fulfill the following conditions
1. Must not affect the engine operation whether the thrust reverser is applied or stowed
2. Withstand high temperature if it is used in the turbine exhaust
3. Mechanically strong
4. Relatively light in weight
5. When stowed should be streamlined into the engine nacelle and should not add appreciably
to the frontal area of the engine
6. Reliable and fail safe
7. Cause few increased maintenance problems
8. Provide at least 50% of the full forward thrust.
High by-pass turbofan engines normally use blocker doors to reverse the cold stream
airflow; type (C) in Figure 3.4. Cascade-type reverser uses numerous turning vanes in gas path
to direct the gas flow outward and forward during operation. Some types utilize a sleeve to
cover the fan cascade during forward thrust. Aft movement of the reverse sleeves causes
blocker doors to blank off the cold stream final nozzle and deflect fan discharge air forward
through fixed cascade vanes, producing reverse thrust. In some installations, cascade turning
vanes are used in conjunction with clamshell to reverse the turbine exhaust gases. Both the
cascade and the clamshell are located forward of the turbine exhaust nozzle. For reverse thrust,
the clamshell blocks the flow of exhaust gases and exposes the cascade vanes, which act as an
exhaust nozzle. Some installations in low-bypass turbofan unmixed engines use two sets of
cascade: forward and rearward. For the forward cascade, the impinging exhaust is turned by the
blades in the cascade into the forward direction. Concerning the rearward cascade, the exhaust
from the hot gas generator strikes the closed clamshell doors and is diverted forward and
outward through a cascade installed in these circumferential openings in the engine nacelle.
Hence, if we know Mach number M at any cross section and corresponding area A then we can
IARE
calculate the area of the throat for the duct. From this expression it is also clear that the Mach
number at any cross-section upstream or downstream of the throat is not dependent on the
nature of variation of cross-sectional area of the duct in the streamwise direction.
Nozzle flow
Consider the convergent divergent duct shown in Fig 3.5. Left end of the duct corresponds to
the stagnation or total conditions (T0‘, P0 and ρ0) due to its connection to the reservoir while
right end of the duct is open to the atmospheric pressure Pa. If initially exit pressure (Pe) is
same as the reservoir pressure (P0) then there will not be any flow through the duct. If we
decrease the exit pressure by small amount then flow takes place through the duct. Here
convergent portion acts as nozzle where pressure decreases and Mach number increases in the
streamwise direction while divergent portion acts as diffuser which leads to increase in pressure
and Mach number along the length of the nozzle. Variation of pressure and Mach number for
this condition is shown in Fig 3.6 and Fig 3.7 respectively by tag 1.
Fig. 3.6: Mach number variation along the length of the duct for various exit pressure
conditions
Fig 3.7: Pressure variation along the length of the duct for various exit pressure conditions
Further decrease in pressure at the exit of the duct shifts the pressure and Mach number curves
as shown in Fig 3.7 tagged by 2. Mass flow continues to increase with decreasing the exit
pressure from conditions from 1 to 2. Condition 3 in this figure represents first critical
condition or a particular value of exit pressure at which Mach number at the minimum cross-
section of the duct becomes 1 or sonic. From Fig. 3.6 it is clear that convergent portion
continues to act as nozzle while divergent portion acts as diffuser. Pressure at the throat where
Mach number has reached 1 attains the reference star value which is equal to 0.528 times the
reservoir pressure for isentropic air flow. Further decrease in exit pressure beyond the first
critical pressure (corresponding to situation 3), does not change the role of convergent portion
as the nozzle. The pressure and Mach number in the convergent portion also remain unchanged
with further decrease in exit pressure. Once the sonic state is achieved at the minimum cross
section, mass flow rate through the duct attains saturation. Hence duct or the nozzle is said to
be choked for any pressure value lower than the first critical condition. Typical mass flow rate
variation for air flow with change in exit pressure is shown in Fig. 3.8.
Fig 3.8: Variation of mass flow rate for air with change in exit pressure
Variation of pressure and Mach number for a typical exit pressure just below first critical
conditions is shown in Fig 3.9 (a & b) respectively. As discussed earlier, for this situation also
pressure decreases and Mach number increases in the convergent portion of the duct. Thus
Mach number attains value 1 at the end of convergent section or at the throat. Fluid continues
to expand in the initial part of the divergent portion which corresponds to decrease in pressure
and increase in Mach number in the supersonic regime in that part of the duct. However, if
fluid continues to expand in the rest part of the duct then pressure of the fluid is exected to
reach a value at the exit which is much lower than the exit pressure (as shown by isentropic
expansion in Fig 3.9(a &b). Therefore, a normal shock gets created after initial expansion in the
divergent portion to increase the pressure and decrease the Mach number to subsonic value
(Fig3.10). Hence rest of the portion of divergent duct acts as diffuser to increase the pressure in
the direction of flow to reach the exit pressure value smoothly.
Fig 3.9b: Mach number variation along the length of the nozzle.
Fig 3.10: Presence of normal shock in the nozzle flow
For the further decrease in exit pressure for the same reservoir condition, the portion of
divergent part acting as nozzle, intern the normal shock moves towards exit of the duct. For a
particular value of exit pressure normal shock stands at the exit of the convergent divergent
duct. Decrease in the exit pressure beyond this condition provides oblique shock pattern
originating from the edge of the duct to raise pressure in order to attain the exit pressure
conditions. Corresponding condition is shown in Fig 3.1.
For this exit pressure condition, the flow inside the duct is isentropic. However fluid attains the
pressure at the exit of the duct which is lower than the exit pressure, hence it has to pass
through the oblique shock and attain the pressure as that of exit pressure by the non-isentropic
process. Hence such condition of the duct is called as 'over expanded nozzle' and it is shown
in Fig 3.11. Decrease in exit pressure beyond this over expanded condition, decreases the
strength of oblique shock and hence the amount of pressure rise. Hence at a particular value of
exit pressure fluid pressure at the exit of the duct becomes exactly equal to the exit pressure and
flow becomes completely isentropic for the duct. In this condition both convergent and
divergent portions of the duct act as nozzle to expand the flow smoothly, hence duct is called as
convergent divergent nozzle. Expansion of the flow in the convergent divergent nozzle is
mentioned as 'isentropic expansion' in Fig3.9 (a & b). Further decrease in exit pressure beyond
the isentropic condition corresponds to more fluid pressure at the exit in comparison with the
ambient pressure. Hence expansion fan gets originated from the edge of the nozzle to decrease
the pressure smoothly to reach the ambient condition isentropically. Nozzle flow for such a
situation is termed as 'under-expanded nozzle flow. Corresponding flow pattern is shown in
Fig3.12.
However,
Hence
From this expression it is clear that for a convergent divergent nozzle, for given throat area,
choked mass flow rate remains constant for the fixed reservoir (P 0 and T0) conditions.
Therefore choked mass flow rate can be increased by increasing the reservoir pressure P0 or
decreasing reservoir temperature T0.
UNIT – III
AXIAL FLOW OMPRESSORS AND TURBINES
Centrifugal compressor Principle of operation
The centrifugal compressor consists essentially of a stationary casing containing a rotating
impeller which imparts a high velocity to the air, and a number of fixed diverging passages in
which the air is decelerated with a consequent rise in static pressure. The latter process is one of
diffusion, and consequently the part of the compressor containing the diverging passages is
known as the diffuser.
Air is sucked into the impeller eye and whirled round at high speed by the vanes on the
impeller disc. At any point in the flow of air through the impeller, the centripetal acceleration is
obtained by a pressure head, so that the static pressure of the air increases from the eye to the
tip of the impeller. The remainder of the static pressure rise is obtained in the diffuser, where
the very high velocity of the air leaving the impeller tip is reduced to somewhere in the region
of the velocity with which the air enters the impeller eye; it should be appreciated that friction
in the diffuser will cause some loss in stagnation pressure. The normal practice is to design the
compressor so that about half the pressure rise occurs in the impeller and half in the diffuser.
It will be appreciated that owing to the action of the vanes in carrying the air around with the
impeller, there will be a slightly higher static pressure on the forward face of a vane than on the
trailing face. The air will thus tend to flow round the edges of the vanes in the clearance space
between the impeller and the casing. This naturally results in a loss of efficiency, and the
clearance must be kept as small as possible.
A shroud attached to the vanes, Fig. 4.1(d), would eliminate such a loss, but the
manufacturing difficulties are vastly increased and there would be a disc friction or ‗windage‘
loss associated with the shroud. Although shrouds have been used on superchargers and
process compressors, they are not used on impellers for gas turbines.
If the air leaves the impeller tip with an absolute velocity C2, it will have a tangential or
whirl component Cw2 and a comparatively small radial component Cr2. Under ideal conditions
C2 would be such that the whirl component is equal to the impeller tip speed U, as shown by
the velocity triangle at the top of Fig. 4.2. Owing to its inertia, the air trapped between the
impeller vanes is reluctant to move round with the impeller, and we have already noted that this
results in a higher static pressure on the leading face of a vane than on the trailing face. It also
prevents the air from acquiring a whirl velocity equal to the impeller speed.
This effect is known as slip. How far the whirl velocity at the impeller tip falls short of
the tip speed depends largely upon the number of vanes on the impeller. The greater the
number of vanes, the smaller the slip, i.e. the more nearly Cw2 approaches U. It is necessary in
design to assume a value for the slip factor s, where s is defined as the ratio Cw2>U.
Various approximate analyses of the flow in an impeller channel have led to formulae
for s: the one appropriate to radial vaned impellers which seems to agree best with experiment
is that due to Stanitz
s = 1 - 0.63p/n
Where n is the number of vanes
Considering unit mass flow of air, this torque is given by
Theoretical torque = Cw2r2 (4.1)
If ω is the angular velocity, the work done on the air will be
Theoretical work done = Cw 2r2 ω = Cw2U
Or, introducing the slip factor,
Theoretical work done = sU2 (4.2)
Owing to friction between the casing and the air carried round by the vanes, and other losses
which have a braking effect such as disc friction or windage, the applied torque and therefore
the actual work input is greater than this theoretical value. A power input factor c can be
introduced to take account of this, so that the actual work done on the air becomes
Work done = ψ σ U2 (4.3)
If (T03 - T01) is the stagnation temperature rise across the whole compressor then, since no
energy is added in the diffuser, this must be equal to the stagnation temperature rise (T02 -
T01) across the impeller alone. It will therefore be equal to the temperature equivalent of the
work done on the air given by equation (4.3), namely where Cp is the mean specific heat over
this temperature range. Typical values for the power input factor lie in the region of
1.03591.04.
T03 - T01 = ψ σ U2/Cp (4.4)
So far we have merely considered the work which must be put into the compressor. If a value
for the overall isentropic efficiency ηcis assumed, then it is known how much of the work is
usefully employed in raising the pressure of the air. The overall stagnation pressure ratio
follows as
(4.5)
Axial Flow Compressors
The basic components of an axial flow compressor are a rotor and stator, the former
carrying the moving blades and the latter the stationary rows of blades. The stationary blades
convert the kinetic energy of the fluid into pressure energy, and also redirect the flow into an
angle suitable for entry to the next row of moving blades. Each stage will consist of one rotor
row followed by a stator row, but it is usual to provide a row of so called inlet guide vanes.
This is an additional stator row upstream of the first stage in the compressor and serves to direct
the axially approaching flow correctly into the first row of rotating blades.
For a compressor, a row of rotor blades followed by a row of stator blades is called a
stage. Two forms of rotor have been taken up, namely drum type and disk type. A disk type
rotor illustrated in Figure 4.3 The disk type is used where consideration of low weight is most
important. There is a contraction of the flow annulus from the low to the high pressure end of
the compressor. This is necessary to maintain the axial velocity at a reasonably constant level
throughout the length of the compressor despite the increase in density of air. Figure 4.4
illustrate flow through compressor stages. In an axial compressor, the flow rate tends to be high
and pressure rise per stage is low. It also maintains fairly high efficiency.
After passing through the diverging passages formed between the rotor blades which do
work on the air and increase its absolute velocity, the air will emerge with the relative velocity
of Vr2 at angle β2 which is less than β1. This turning of air towards the axial direction is, as
previously mentioned, necessary to provide an increase in the effective flow area and is brought
about by the camber of the blades. Since Vr2 is less than Vr1 due to diffusion, some pressure rise
has been accomplished in the rotor. The velocity Vr2in combination with U gives the absolute
velocity V2 at the exit from the rotor at an angle α1to the axial direction. The air then passes
through the passages formed by the stator blades where it is further diffused to velocity V 3at an
angle α3which in most designs equals to α 1so that it is prepared for entry to next stage. Here
again, the turning of the air towards the axial direction is brought about by the camber of the
blades.
(4.6)
(4.7)
In which is the axial velocity, assumed constant through the stage. The work
done per unit mass or specific work input, w being given by
(4.8)
This expression can be put in terms of the axial velocity and air angles to give
(4.9)
or by using Eqs. (4.6) and (4.7)
(4.10)
This input energy will be absorbed usefully in raising the pressure and velocity of the
air. A part of it will be spent in overcoming various frictional losses. Regardless of the losses,
the input will reveal itself as a rise in the stagnation temperature of the air . If the absolute
velocity of the air leaving the stage V3is made equal to that at the entry.V1, the stagnation
temperature rise will also be the static temperature rise of the stage, , so that
(4.11)
In fact, the stage temperature rise will be less than that given in Eq. (4.11) owing to three
dimensional effects in the compressor annulus. Experiments show that it is necessary to
multiply the right hand side of Eq. (4.11) by a work-done factor λ which is a number less than
unity. This is a measure of the ratio of actual work-absorbing capacity of the stage to its ideal
value.
The radial distribution of axial velocity is not constant across the annulus but becomes
increasingly peaky (Figure. 4.9) as the flow proceeds, settling down to a fixed profile at about
the fourth stage. Equation (4.10) can be written with the help of Eq. (4.6) as
(4.12)
Since the outlet angles of the stator and the rotor blades fix the value of α 1 and β2and
hence the value of (tanα1 + tan β2). Any increase in Vfwill result in a decrease in ∞ and vice-
versa. If the compressor is designed for constant radial distribution of Vfas shown by the dotted
line in Figure (4.6), the effect of an increase in V fin the central region of the annulus will be to
reduce the work capacity of blading in that area. However this reduction is somewhat
compensated by an increase in ∞ in the regions of the root and tip of the blading because of the
reduction of Vfat these parts of the annulus.
The net result is a loss in total work capacity because of the adverse effects of blade tip
clearance and boundary layers on the annulus walls. This effect becomes more pronounced as
the number of stages is increased and the way in which the mean value varies with the number
of stages. The variation of λ with the number of stages is shown in Figure. 4.7. Care should be
taken to avoid confusion of the work done factor with the idea of an efficiency. If ∞ is the
expression for the specific work input (Equation. 4.8), then λ∞ is the actual amount of work
which can be supplied to the stage. The application of an isentropic efficiency to the resulting
temperature rise will yield the equivalent isentropic temperature rise from which the stage
pressure ratio may be calculated. Thus, the actual stage temperature rise is given by
(4.13)
(4.14)
where, T01is the inlet stagnation temperature and ηsis the stage isentropic efficiency.
Degree of Reaction
A certain amount of distribution of pressure (a rise in static pressure) takes place as the air
passes through the rotor as well as the stator; the rise in pressure through the stage is in general,
attributed to both the blade rows. The term degree of reaction is a measure of the extent to
which the rotor itself contributes to the increase in the static head of fluid. It is defined as the
ratio of the static enthalpy rise in the rotor to that in the whole stage. Variation of C pover the
relevant temperature range will be negligibly small and hence this ratio of enthalpy rise will be
equal to the corresponding temperature rise.
It is useful to obtain a formula for the degree of reaction in terms of the various
velocities and air angles associated with the stage. This will be done for the most common case
in which it is assumed that the air leaves the stage with the same velocity (absolute) with which
it enters (V1 = V3).
This leads to . If and are the static temperature rises in the rotor and the
stator respectively, then from Eqs (4.9),(4.10),(4.11),
(4.15)
Since all the work input to the stage is transferred to air by means of the rotor, the steady flow
energy equation yields,
(4.16)
The degree of reaction With the help of Eq. (10.2), it becomes
and
(4.17)
(4.18)
As the case of 50% reaction blading is important in design, it is of interest to see the result for
Λ =0.5 ,
i.e. (4.19a)
i.e. (4.20b)
And since we have initially assumed that (V 3 = V1), it follows that α1= α3. Because of this
equality of angles, namely, α1= β2 = α3 and β2 = α2 blading designed on this basis is sometimes
referred to as symmetrical blading .The 50% reaction stage is called a repeating stage.
Figure 4.8 shows a compressor blade cascade tunnel. As the air stream is passed
through the cascade, the direction of air is turned. Pressure and velocity measurements are
made at up and downstream of cascade as shown. The cascade is mounted on a turn-table so
that its angular direction relative to the direction of inflow can be changed, which enables tests
to be made for a range of incidence angle. As the flow passes through the cascade, it is
deflected and there will be a circulation and thus the lift generated will be (Fig 4.9 &
4.10). is the mean velocity that makes an angle with the axial direction
Figure 4.8: A Cascade Tunnel
Compressor cascade:
For a compressor cascade, the static pressure will rise across the cascade, i.e.
Lift =
Lift coefficient,
Turbine Cascade: Static pressure will drop across the turbine cascade, i.e
Compressor Cascade (Viscous Case)
In compressor cascade, due to losses in total pressure , there will be an axial force as
shown in figure below. Thus the drag, which is perpendicular to the lift, is defined as
The lift will be reduced due to the effect of drag which can be expressed as:
Effective lift =
Also we get
[
-maximum,
if
Turbines, like compressors, can be classified into radial, axial and mixed flow
machines. In the axial machine the fluid moves essentially in the axial direction through the
rotor. In the radial type, the fluid motion is mostly radial. The mixed-flow machine is
characterized by a combination of axial and radial motion of the fluid relative to the rotor. The
choice of turbine type depends on the application, though it is not always clear that any one
type is superior.
Comparing axial and radial turbines of the same overall diameter, we may say that the
axial machine, just as in the case of compressors, is capable of handling considerably greater
mass flow. On the other hand, for small mass flows the radial machine can be made more
efficient than the axial one. The radial turbine is capable of a higher pressure ratio per stage
than the axial one. However, multi-staging is very much easier to arrange with the axial
turbine, so that large overall pressure ratios are not difficult to obtain with axial turbines. In this
chapter, we will focus on the axial flow turbine.
Because of the generally falling pressure in turbine flow passages, much more turning
in a giving blade row is possible without danger of flow separation than in an axial compressor
blade row. This means much more work, and considerably higher pressure ratio, per stage.
In recent years advances have been made in turbine blade cooling and in the metallurgy of
turbine blade materials. This means that turbines are able to operate successfully at increasingly
high inlet gas temperatures and that substantial improvements are being made in turbine engine
thrust, weight, and fuel consumption.
Two-dimensional theory of axial flow turbine.
An axial turbine stage consists of a row of stationary blades, called nozzles or stators,
followed by the rotor, as Figure 13.1 illustrates. Because of the large pressure drop per stage,
the nozzle and rotor blades may be of increasing length, as shown, to accommodate the rapidly
expanding gases, while holding the axial velocity to something like a uniform value through the
stage.
It should be noted that the hub-tip ratio for a high pressure gas turbine in quite high, that
is, it is having blades of short lengths. Thus, the radial variation in velocity and pressure may
be neglected and the performance of a turbine stage is calculated from the performance of the
blading at the mean radial section, which is a two-dimensional "pitch-line design analysis ". A
low-pressure turbine will typically have a much lower hub-tip ratio and a larger blade twist. A
two dimensional design is not valid in this case.
In two dimensional approach the flow velocity will have two components, one axial and
the other peripheral, denoted by subscripts 'f' and ∞ respectively. The absolute velocity is
denoted by V and the relative velocity with respect to the impeller by V r. The flow conditions
'1' indicates inlet to the nozzle or stator vane, '2' exit from the nozzle or inlet to the rotor and '3'
exit form the rotor. Absolute angle is represented by α and relative angle by β as before.
Axial Turbine Stage
A section through the mean radius would appear as in Figure.13.1. One can see that the nozzles
accelerate the flow imparting an increased tangential velocity component. The velocity diagram
of the turbine differs from that of the compressor in that the change in tangential velocity in the
rotor, , is in the direction opposite to the blade speed U. The reaction to this change in the
tangential momentum of the fluid is a torque on the rotor in the direction of motion. Hence the
fluid does work on the rotor.
Again applying the angular momentum relation-ship, we may show that the power
output as,
(13.1)
In an axial turbine,
Again,
Defining
We find that the stage work ratio is
(13.2)
Combined velocity diagram
Thus,
i.e, (13.3)
The Eq.(13.3) gives the expression for WTin terms of gas angles associated with the rotor
blade.
Note that the "work-done factor" required in the case of the axial compressor is
unnecessary here. This is because in an accelerating flow the effect of the growth of boundary
layer along the annulus passage in much less than when there is a decelerating flow with an
average pressure gradient.
Instead of temperature drop ratio [defined in Eq. (13.2)], turbine designers generally refer to the
work capacity of a turbine stage as,
(13.4)
Ψ is a dimensionless parameter, which is called the "blade loading capacity" or "temperature
drop coefficient". In gas turbine design, Vfis kept generally constant across a stage and the ratio
Vf/U is called "the flow coefficient" ϕ.
Thus, Eq. (13.4) can be written as,
(13.5)
As the boundary layer over the blade surface is not very sensitive in the case of a turbine, the
turbine designer has considerably more freedom to distribute the total stage pressure drop
between the rotor and the stator. However, locally on the suction surface of the blade there
could be a zone of an adverse pressure gradient depending on the turning and on the pitch of
the blades. Thus, the boundary layer could grow rapidly or even separate in such a region
affecting adversely the turbine efficiency.
Figure 13.3 illustrates the schematic of flow within the blade passage and the pressure
distribution over the section surface depicting a zone of diffusion. Different design groups have
their own rules, learned from experience of blade testing, for the amount of diffusion which is
permissible particularly for highly loaded blades.
Fig. 7.45 :Radial turbine with Back-to-back rotor [courtesy Kongsberg Ltd]
(7.45)
In the ideal isentropic turbine with perfect diffuser the specific work output would be
where the velocity equivalent of the isentropic enthalpy drop, C0, is sometimes called the
‗spouting velocity‘ by analogy with hydraulic turbine practice. For this ideal case it follows
2
that U2 0 = C 2>2 or U2>C0 = 0.707. In practice, it is found that a good overall efficiency is
obtained if this velocity ratio lies between 0.68 and 0.71. In terms of the turbine pressure ratio,
C0 is given by
Figure 7.46 depicts the processes in the turbine and exhaust diffuser on the T–s diagram. The
overall isentropic efficiency of the turbine and diffuser may be expressed by
because (T01 - T4‘) is the temperature equivalent of the maximum work that could be produced
by an isentropic expansion from the inlet state (p01, T01) to pa. Considering the turbine alone,
however, the efficiency is more suitably expressed by
which is the ‗total-to-static‘ isentropic efficiency referred to in section 7.1. Following axial
flow turbine practice, the nozzle loss coefficient may be defined in the usual way by
Degree of reaction
Another useful dimensionless parameter is the "degree for reaction" or simply the "reaction" R.
It may be defined for a turbine as the fraction of overall enthalpy drop (or pressure drop)
occurring in the rotor
Thus, (14.1)
or,
Turbine stage in which the entire pressure drop occurs in the nozzle are called "impulse stages".
Stages in which a portion of the pressure drop occurs in the nozzle and the rest in the rotor are
called reaction stages. In a 50% reaction turbine, the enthalpy drop in the rotor would be half of
the total for the stage.
An impulse turbine stage is shown in Fig14.1, along with the velocity diagram for the
common case of constant axial velocity. Since no enthalpy change occurs within the rotor, the
energy equation within the rotor requires that |V r2| = |Vr3|. If the axial velocity is held constant,
then this requirement is satisfied by
Then,
(14.2)
The Eq. (14.2) illustrates the effect of the nozzle outlet angle on the impulse turbine work
output.
It is evident, then, that for large power output the nozzle angle should be as large as
possible. Two difficulties are associated with very large α2. For reasonable axial velocities (i.e.,
reasonable flow per unit frontal area), it is evident that large α 2creates very large absolute and
relative velocities throughout the stage. High losses are associated with such velocities,
especially if the relative velocity Vr2is supersonic. In practice, losses seem to be minimized for
values of α2around70°. In addition, one can see that for large α[tanα 2>(2U/Vf)], the absolute
exhaust velocity will have a swirl in the direction opposite to U.
While we have not introduced the definition of turbine efficiency as yet, it is clear that,
in a turbojet engine where large axial exhaust velocity is desired, the kinetic energy associated
with the tangential motion of the exhaust gases is essentially a loss. Furthermore, application of
the angular momentum equation over the entire engine indicates that exhaust swirl is associate
with (undesirable) net torque acting on the aircraft. Thus the desire is for axial or near-axial
absolute exhaust velocity (at least for the last stage if a multistage turbine is used). For the
special case of constant Vfand axial exhaust velocity Vw3 = 0 and Vw2 = 2U, the Eq.14.2
becomes,
For a given power and rotor speed, and for a given peak temperature, Eq. (14.2) is
sufficient to determine approximately the mean blade speed (and hence radius) of a single-stage
impulse turbine having axial outlet velocity. If , as is usually the case, the blade speed is too
high (for stress limitations), or if the mean diameter is too large relative to the other engine
components, it is necessary to employ a multistage turbine in which each stage does part of the
work.
STAGE EFFICENCY
The aerodynamic losses in the turbine differ with the stage configuration, that is, the
degree of reaction. Improved efficiency is associated with higher reaction, which tends to mean
less work per stage and thus a large number of stages for a given overall pressure ratio.The
understanding of aerodynamic losses is important to design, not only in the choice of blading
type (impulse or reaction) but also in devising ways to control these losses, for example,
methods to control the clearance between the tip of the turbine blade and the outer casing wall.
The choices of blade shape, aspect ratio, spacing, Reynolds number, Mach number and flow
incidence angle can all affect the losses and hence the efficiency of turbine stages.
Two definitions of efficiency are in common usage: the choice between them depends
on the application for which the turbine is used. For many conventional applications, useful
turbine output is in the form of shift power and the kinetic energy of the exhaust, [(V3)2/2], is
considered as a loss. In this case, ideal work would be Cp (T01- T3s) and a total to static turbine
efficiency, ηts, based on the inlet and exit static conditions, is used.
Thus, (15.1)
The ideal (isentropic) to actual expansion process in turbines is illustrated in Fig 15.1.
(15.2)
In some applications, particularly in turbojets, the exhaust kinetic energy is not considered a
loss since the exhaust gases are intended to emerge at high velocity. The ideal work in this case
is then Cp (T01- T03s)rather than Cp (T01- T3s). This requires a different definition of efficiency,
the total-to-total turbine efficiency ηtt, defined by
(15.3)
Thus
(15.4)
or,
Turbine Performance
For a given design of turbine operating with a given fluid at sufficiently high Reynolds
member, it can be shown from the dimensional analysis as,
where, stagnation states 02 and 03 are at the turbine inlet and outlet, respectively. Figure (15.2)
shows the overall performance of a particular single-stage turbine.
Typical characteristics of a turbine stage
One can see that pressure ratios greater than those for compressor stages can be
obtained with satisfactory efficiency. The performance of turbines is limited principally by two
factors: compressibility and stress. Compressibility limits the mass flow that can pass through a
given turbine and, as we will see, stress limits the wheel speed U. The work per stage, for
example, depends on the square of the wheel speed. However, the performance of the engine
depends very strongly on the maximum temperature. Of course, as the maximum temperature
increases, the allowable stress level diminishes; hence in the design of the engine there must be
a compromise between maximum temperature and maximum rotor tip speed U.
For given pressure ratio and adiabatic efficiency, the turbine work per unit mass is
proportional to the inlet stagnation temperature. Since, in addition, the turbine work in a jet or
turboshaft engine is commonly two or three times the useful energy output of the engine, a 1%
increase in turbine inlet temperature can produce a 2% or 3% increase in engine output. This
considerable advantage has supplied the incentive for the adoption of fairly elaborate methods
for cooling the turbine nozzle and rotor blades.
(a) the stagnation enthalpy h0 is constant over the annulus (i.e. dh0>dr = 0),
(b) the axial velocity is constant over the annulus, and
(c) the whirl velocity is inversely proportional to the radius,
then the condition for radial equilibrium of the fluid elements, namely equation (5.13), is
satisfied. A stage designed in accordance with (a), (b) and (c) is called a free vortex stage.
Applying this to the stage in Fig. 5.8, we can see that with uniform inlet conditions to the
nozzles then, since no work is done by the gas in the nozzles, h0 must also be constant over the
annulus at outlet. Thus condition (a) is fulfilled in the space between the nozzles and rotor
blades. Furthermore, if the nozzles are designed to give Ca2 = constant and Cw2r = constant,
all three conditions are fulfilled and the condition for radial equilibrium is satisfied in plane 2.
Similarly, if the rotor blades are designed so that Ca3 = constant and Cw3r = constant, it is easy
to show as follows that condition (a) will be fulfilled, and thus radial equilibrium will be
achieved in plane 3 also. Writing v for the angular velocity we have
But when the work done per unit mass of gas is constant over the annulus, and h0 is constant at
the inlet, h0 must be constant at the outlet also: thus condition (a) is met.
It is apparent that a free vortex design is one in which the work done per unit mass
of gas is constant over the annulus, and to obtain the total work output this specific value need
only be calculated at one convenient radius and multiplied by the mass flow. In contrast, we
may note that because the density varies from root to tip at exit from the nozzles and the axial
velocity is constant, an integration over the annulus will be necessary if the continuity equation
is to be used in plane 2. Thus, considering a flow dm through an annular element of radius r
and width dr,
With the radial variation of density determined from vortex theory, the integration can be
performed although the algebra is lengthy. For detailed calculations it would be normal to use a
digital computer, permitting ready calculation of the density at a series of radii and numerical
integration of equation (5.22) to obtain the mass flow. For preliminary calculations, however, it
is sufficiently accurate to take the intensity of mass flow at the mean diameter as being the
mean intensity of mass flow. In other words, the total mass flow is equal to the mass flow per
unit area calculated using the density at the mean diameter (r2m Ca2) multiplied by the annulus
area (A2). This is one reason why it is convenient to design the turbine on conditions at mean
diameter (as was done in the previous example) and use the relations which will now be
derived for obtaining the gas angles at other radii.
Using suffix m to denote quantities at mean diameter, the free vortex variation of nozzle
angle a2 may be found as follows:
The gas angles at the inlet to the rotor blade, b2, can then be found using equation
(5.1), namely
similarly b3 is given by
To obtain some idea of the free vortex variation of gas angles with radius, equations
(5.23)–(5.26) will be applied to the turbine designed in the previous section. We will merely
calculate the angles at the root and tip, although in practice they would be determined at several
stations up the blade to define the twist more precisely. We will at the same time clear up two
loose ends: we have to check that there is some positive reaction at the root radius, and that the
Mach number relative to the rotor blade at the inlet, MV2, is nowhere higher than, say, 0.75.
From the velocity triangles at the root and tip it will be seen that this Mach number is greatest
at the root and it is only at this radius that it need be calculated.
The variation of gas angles with radius appears as in Fig. 5.9, which also includes the velocity
triangles at the root and tip drawn to scale. That MV2 = V2>U (gRT2) is greatest at the root is
clear from the velocity triangles: V2 is then a maximum, and U(gRT2) is a minimum because
the temperature drop across the nozzles is greatest at the root. That there is some
positive reaction at the root is also clear because V3r 7 V2r. Although there is no need literally
to calculate the degree of reaction at the root, we must calculate (MV2)r to ensure that the
design implies a safe value. Using data from the example in section 5.1 we have
Consider the flow in the space between the nozzles and blades. As before, we assume
that the flow is uniform across the annulus at the inlet to the nozzles, and so the stagnation
enthalpy at the outlet must also be uniform, i.e. dh0>dr = 0 in plane 2. Also, if a2 is to be
constant we have
The vortex flow equation therefore becomes
And with constant a2, Ca2 Cw2 so that the variation of Ca2 must be the same,
Namely
Normally, nozzle angles are greater than 60°, and quite a good approximation to the
flow satisfying the equilibrium condition is obtained by designing with a constant nozzle angle
and constant angular momentum, i.e. a2 = constant and Cw2r = constant. If this approximation
is made and the rotor blades are twisted to give constant angular momentum at the outlet also,
then, as for free vortex flow, the work output per unit mass flow is the same at all radii. On the
other hand, if equation (5.28) were used it would be necessary to integrate from root to tip to
obtain the work output. We observed early in section 5.2 that there is little difference in
efficiency between turbines of low radius ratio designed with twisted and untwisted blading. It
follows that the sort of approximation referred to here is certainly unlikely to result in a
significant deterioration of performance.
The free vortex and constant nozzle angle types of design do not exhaust the
possibilities. For example, one other type of vortex design aims to satisfy the radial equilibrium
condition and at the same time meet a condition of constant mass flow per unit area at all radii.
That is, the axial and whirl velocity distributions are chosen so that the product r2Ca2 is
constant at all radii. The advocates of this approach correctly point out that the simple vortex
theory outlined in section 5.6 assumes no radial component of velocity, and yet even if the
turbine is designed with no flare there must be a radial shift of the streamlines as shown in Fig.
5.10. This shift is due to the increase in density from root to tip in plane 2assumption that the
radial component is zero would undoubtedly be true for a turbine of constant annulus area if the
stage were designed for constant mass flow per unit area. It is argued that the flow is then more
likely to behave as intended, so that the gas angles will more closely match the blade angles.
Further details can be found in [Ref. (1)]. In view of what has just been said about the dubious
benefits of vortex blading for turbines of modest radius ratio, it is very doubtful indeed whether
such refinements are more than an academic exercise.
Choice of blade profile, pitch and chord
So far in our worked example we have shown how to establish the gas angles at all radii and
blade heights. The next step is to choose stator and rotor blade shapes which will accept the gas
incident upon the leading edge, and deflect the gas through the required angle with the
minimum loss. An overall blade loss coefficient Y (or l) must account for the following sources
of friction loss
(a) Profile loss—associated with boundary layer growth over the blade profile (including
separation loss under adverse conditions of extreme angles of incidence or high inlet Mach
number).
(b) Annulus loss—associated with boundary layer growth on the inner and outer walls of the
annulus.
(c) Secondary flow loss—arising from secondary flows which are always present when a wall
boundary layer is turned through an angle by an adjacent curved surface.
(d) Tip clearance loss—near the rotor blade tip the gas does not follow the intended path, fails
to contribute its quota of work output, and interacts with the outer wall boundary layer.
The profile loss coefficient Yp is measured directly in cascade tests similar to those
described for compressor blading in section 5.8. Losses (b) and (c) cannot easily be separated,
and they are accounted for by a secondary loss coefficient Ys. The tip clearance loss
coefficient, which normally arises only for rotor blades, will be denoted by Yk. Thus the total
loss coefficient Y comprises the accurately measured two-dimensional loss Yp, plus the three-
dimensional loss (Ys + Yk) which must be deduced from turbine stage test results. A
description of one important compilation of such data will be given in section 5.4; all that is
necessary for our present purpose is a knowledge of the sources of loss.
Conventional blading
Figure 5.11 shows a conventional steam turbine blade profile constructed from circular arcs
and straight lines. Gas turbines have until recently used profiles closely resembling this,
although specified by aerofoil terminology
FIG. 5.12 Effect of incidence upon Yp
FIG. 5.13 Relation between gas and blade outlet angles
The pitch and chord have tobe chosen with due regard to (a) the effect of the pitch/chord ratio
(s/c) on the blade loss coefficient, (b) the effect of chord upon the aspect ratio (h/c),
remembering that h has already been determined, (c) the effect of rotor blade chord on the
blade stresses, and (d) the effect of rotor blade pitch upon the stresses at the point of attachment
of the blades to the turbine disc. We will consider each effect in turn.FIG. 5.13 Relation
between gas and blade outlet angles.
(b) Gas bending stresses are (1) inversely proportional to the number of
blades and blade section moduli, while being (2) directly proportional to the
blade height and specific work output:
(1) The number of blades cannot be increased beyond a point set by blade fixing
considerations, but the section moduli are roughly proportional to the cube of the blade
chord which might be increased to reduce sgb. There is an aerodynamic limit on the
pitch/chord ratio, however, which if too small will incur a high loss coefficient (friction
losses increase because a reduction in s/c increases the blade surface area swept by the
gas).
(2) There remains the blade height, but reducing this while maintaining the same annulus
area (and therefore the same axial velocity for the given mass flow) implies an increase in
the mean diameter of the annulus. For a fixed N, the mean diameter cannot be increased
without increasing the centrifugal disc stresses. There will also be an aerodynamic limit set
bythe need to keep the blade aspect ratio (h/c) and annulus radius ratio (rt>rr) at values
which do not imply disproportionate losses due to secondary flows, tip clearance and
friction on the annulus walls (say, not less than 2 and 1.2 respectively). The blade height
might be reduced by reducing the annulus area (with the added benefit of reducing the
centrifugalblade stresses) but, for a given mass flow, only by increasing the axial velocity.
An aerodynamic limit on Ca will be set by the need to keep the maximum relative Mach
number at the blade inlet (namely, at the root radius), and the Mach number at outlet from
the stage, below the levels which mean high friction losses in the blading and jet pipe
respectively.
(c) Optimizing the design, so that it just falls within the limits set by all these conflicting
mechanical and aerodynamic requirements, will lead to an efficient turbine of minimum weight.
If it proves to be impossible to meet one or more of the limiting conditions, the required work
output must be split between two stages. The second design attempt would be commenced on
the assumption that the efficiency is likely to be a maximum when the work, and hence the
temperature drop, is divided equally between the stages.
(d) The velocity triangles, upon which the rotor blade section depends, are partially determined
by the desire to work with an average degree of reaction of 50 per cent to obtain low blade loss
coefficients and zero swirl for minimum loss in the jet pipe. To avoid the need for two stages in
a marginal case, particularly if it means adding a bearing on the downstream side, it would
certainly be preferable to design with a lower degree of reaction and some swirl. An
aerodynamic limit on the minimum value of the reaction at mean diameter is set by the need to
ensure some positive reaction at the blade root radius.
Figure 5.27(a) illustrates the principal features of nozzle blade cooling. The air is introduced in
such a way as to provide jet impingement cooling of the inside surface of the very hot leading
edge. A large fraction of the spent air leaves through cooling holes in the blade surface (to
provide film cooling), and the remainder of the air exits at the trailing edge. Trailing edge
cooling is important, as this is such a thin material with high heat load. The spent air leaves
through slots or holes in the blade surface (to provide some film cooling) or in the trailing edge.
Figure 5.27(b) depicts a modern cast nozzle airfoil with intricate inserts forming the cooling
passages. It also shows the way the annulus walls are cooled. The introduction of large high
efficiency combined cycles resulted in several manufacturers developing steam-cooled systems,
to reduce the significant parasitic loss due to air cooling. Most restricted their activities to
cooling combustors and nozzles.
Film cooling is the process of bleeding relatively cool air from the compressor, ducting the cooling air
to the turbine blades, and discharging the air through small holes in the blade walls. Goldstein [Ref.
(17)] defines film cooling as the Introduction of secondary fluid (coolant or injected fluid) at one or
more discrete locations along a surface exposed to a high temperature environment to protect that
surface not only in the immediate region of injection but also in the downstream region‘. This air
provides a thin, cool, insulating blanket along the external surface of the turbine blade, reducing the
temperature near the wall. Film cooling is employed on all surfaces of the airfoil, including the pressure
and suction surfaces, blade tips, platforms and end walls of static turbine vanes, as shown earlier in Fig.
5.32.
Ramjet is the simplest of all the air breathing engines. It consists of a diffuser, combustion chamber and
a nozzle. Ramjets are most efficient when operated at supersonic speeds. When air is decelerated from a
high Mach number to a low subsonic Mach number, it results in substantial increase in pressure and
temperature. Hence ramjets do not need compressors and consequently no turbines as well.
INTRODUCTION
Solid propellant motors are the simplest of all rocket designs. They consist of a casing, usually
steel, filled with a mixture of solid compounds (fuel and oxidizer) that burn at a rapid rate,
expelling hot gases from a nozzle to produce thrust. When ignited, a solid propellant burns from
the center out towards the sides of the casing. The shape of the center channel determines the
rate and pattern of the burn, thus providing a means to control thrust. Unlike liquid propellant
engines, solid propellant motors cannot be shut down. Once ignited, they will burn until all the
propellant is exhausted.
Salient features of solid propellant rockets:
There are two families of solids propellants: homogeneous and composite. Both types are dense,
stable at ordinary temperatures, and easily storable.
Homogeneous propellants are either simple base or double base. A simple base propellant
consists of a single compound, usually nitrocellulose, which has both an oxidation capacity and a
reduction capacity. Double base propellants usually consist of nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine,
to which a plasticiser is added. Homogeneous propellants do not usually have specific impulses
greater than about 210 seconds under normal conditions. Their main asset is that they do not
produce traceable fumes and are, therefore, commonly used in tactical weapons. They are also
often used to perform subsidiary functions such as jettisoning spent parts or separating one stage
from another.
Modern composite propellants are heterogeneous powders (mixtures) that use a crystallized or
finely ground mineral salt as an oxidizer, often ammonium perchlorate, which constitutes
between 60% and 90% of the mass of the propellant. The fuel itself is generally aluminum. The
propellant is held together by a polymeric binder, usually polyurethane or polybutadiens, which
is also consumed as fuel. Additional compounds are sometimes included, such as a catalyst to
help increase the burning rate, or other agents to make the powder easier to manufacture. The
final product is rubber like substance with the consistency of a hard rubber eraser.
Composite propellants are often identified by the type of polymeric binder used. The two most
common binders are polybutadiene acrylic acid acrylonitrile (PBAN) and hydroxy-terminator
polybutadiene (HTPB). PBAN formulations give a slightly higher specific impulse, density, and
burn rate than equivalent formulations using HTPB. However, PBAN propellant is the more
difficult to mix and process and requires an elevated curing temperature. HTPB binder is stronger
and more flexible than PBAN binder. Both PBAN and HTPB formulations result in propellants
that deliver excellent performance, have good mechanical properties, and offer potentially long
burn times.
Solid propellant motors have a variety of uses. Small solids often power the final stage of a
launch vehicle, or attach to payloads to boost them to higher orbits. Medium solids such as the
Payload Assist Module (PAM) and the Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) provide the added boost to
place satellites into geosynchronous orbit or on planetary trajectories.
The Titan, Delta, and Space Shuttle launch vehicles use strap-on solid propellant rockets to
provide added thrust at liftoff. The Space Shuttle uses the largest solid rocket motors ever built
and flown. Each booster contains 500,000 kg (1,100,000 pounds) of propellant and can produce
up to 14,680,000 Newtons (3,300,000 pounds) of thrust.
Adiabatic Flame Temperature: For a combustion process that takes place adiabatically with
no shaft work, the temperature of the products is referred to as the adiabatic flame temperature.
This is the maximum temperature that can be achieved for given reactants. Heat transfer,
incomplete combustion, and dissociation all result in lower temperature. The maximum adiabatic
flame temperature for a given fuel and oxidizer combination occurs with a stoichiometric
mixture (correct proportions such that all fuel and all oxidizer are consumed). The amount of
excess air can be tailored as part of the design to control the adiabatic flame temperature. The
considerable distance between present temperatures in a gas turbine engine and the maximum
adiabatic flame temperature at stoichiometric conditions is shown in Figure , based on a
compressor exit temperature of (922 K).
Figure 3.3: Schematic of adiabatic flame temperature
An initial view of the concept of adiabatic flame temperature is provided by examining two
reacting gases, at a given pressure, and asking what the end temperature is. The process is shown
schematically in Figure 3.3, where temperature is plotted versus the percentage completion of the
reaction. The initial state is and the final state is , with the final state at a higher
temperature than the initial state. The solid line in the figure shows a representation of the
``actual'' process.
To see how we would arrive at the final completion state the dashed lines break the state of
reaction change into two parts. Process (1) is reaction at constant and . To carry out such
a process, we would need to extract heat. Suppose the total amount of heat extracted per unit
For Process (2), we put this amount back into the products to raise their temperature to the final
level. For this process,
or, if we can approximate the specific heat as constant (using some appropriate average value)
For the overall process there is no work done and no heat exchanged so that the difference in
enthalpy between initial and final states is zero:
The temperature change during this second process is therefore given by (approximately)
(1)
The value of the adiabatic flame temperature given in Equation (1) is for 100% completion of the
reaction. In reality, as the temperature increases, the tendency is for the degree of reaction to be
less than 100%. For example, for the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen, at high temperatures
the combustion product (water) dissociates back into the simpler elemental reactants. The degree
of reaction is thus itself a function of temperature that needs to be computed. We used this idea
in discussing the stoichiometric ramjet, when we said that the maximum temperature was
independent of flight Mach number and hence of inlet stagnation temperature. It is also to be
emphasized that the idea of a constant (average) specific heat, , is for illustration and not
inherently part of the definition of adiabatic flame temperature.
The rocket motor's operation and design depend on the combustion characteristics of the propellant, its
burning rate, burning surface, and grain geometry. The branch of applied science describing these is
known as internal ballistics; The burning surface of a propellant grain recedes in a direction essentially
perpendicular to the surface. The rate of regression, usually expressed in cm/sec, mm/sec, or in./sec, is the
burning rate r. In Fig. 3.5 we can visualize the change of the grain geometry by drawing successive
burning surfaces with a constant time interval between adjacent surface contours. Figure 3.5 shows this
for a two-dimensional grain with a central cylindrical cavity with five slots. Success in rocket motor
design and development depends significantly on knowledge of burning rate behavior of the selected
propellant under all motor operating conditions and design limit conditions.
Burning rate is a function of the propellant composition. For composite propellants it can be increased by
changing the propellant characteristics:
1. Add a burning rate catalyst, often called burning rate modifier (0.1 to
3.0% of propellant) or increase percentage of existing catalyst.
2. Decrease the oxidizer particle size.
3. Increase oxidizer percentage.
4. Increase the heat of combustion of the binder and/or the plasticizer.
5. Imbed wires or metal staples in the propellant.
The grain is the shaped mass of processed solid propellant inside the rocket
motor. The propellant material and geometrical configuration of the grain
determine the motor performance characteristics. The propellant grain is a cast,
molded, or extruded body and its appearance and feel is similar to that of hard
rubber or plastic. Once ignited, it will burn on all its exposed surfaces to form hot
gases that are then exhausted through a nozzle. A few rocket motors have more
than one grain inside a single case or chamber and very few grains have segments
made of different propellant composition (e.g., to allow different burning rates).
However, most rockets have a single grain. There are two methods of holding the
grain in the case, as seen in Fig. 3.4. Cartridge-loaded or freestanding grains are
manufactured separately from the case (by extrusion or by casting into a
cylindrical mold or cartridge) and then loaded into or assembled into the case. In
case-bonded grains the case is used as a mold and the propellant is cast directly
into the case and is bonded to the case or case insulation. Free-standing grains can
more easily be replaced loaded) and a case-bonded grain.
If the propellant grain has aged excessively. Aging is discussed in the next chapter.
Cartridge-loaded grains are used in some small tactical missiles and a few medium-
sized motors. They often have a lower cost and are easier to inspect. The case-
bonded grains give a somewhat better performance, a little less inert mass (no
holding device, support pads, and less insulation), a better volumetric loading
fraction, are more highly stressed, and often somewhat more difficult and expensive
to manufacture. Today almost all larger motors and many tactical missile motors use
case bonding.
COMBUSTION INSTABILITY:
There seem to be two types of combustion instability: a set of acoustic resonances or pressure oscillations,
which can occur with any rocket motor, and a vortex shedding phenomenon, which occurs only with
particular types of grains.
Acoustic Instabilities: When a solid propellant rocket motor experiences unstable combustion, the
pressure in the interior gaseous cavities (made up by the volume of the port or perforations, fins, slots,
conical or radial groves) oscillates by at least 5% and often by more than 30% of the chamber pressure.
When instability occurs, the heat transfer to the burning surfaces, the nozzle, and the insulated case walls
is greatly increased; the burning rate, chamber pressure, and thrust usually increase; but the burning
duration is thereby decreased. The change in the thrust-time profile causes significant changes in the
flight path, and at times this can lead to failure of the mission. If prolonged and if the vibration energy
level is high, the instability can cause damage to the hardware, such as overheating the case and causing a
nozzle or case failure. Instability is a condition that should be avoided and must be carefully investigated
and remedied if it occurs during a motor development program. Final designs of motors must be free of
such instability.
There are fundamental differences with liquid propellant combustion behavior. In liquid propellants there
is fixed chamber geometry with a rigid wall; liquids in feed systems and in injectors that are not part of
the oscillating gas in the combustion chamber can interact strongly with the pressure fluctuations. In solid
propellant motors the geometry of the oscillating cavity increases in size as burning proceeds and there
are stronger damping factors, such as solid particles and energy-absorbing viscoelastic materials. In
general, combustion instability problems do not occur frequently or in every motor development, and,
when they do occur, it is rarely the cause for a drastic sudden motor failure or disintegration.
Nevertheless, drastic failures have occurred. Undesirable oscillations in the combustion cavity propellant
rocket motors is a continuing problem in the design, development, production, and even long-term (10 yr)
retention of solid rocket missiles. While acoustically "softer" than a liquid rocket combustion chamber,
the combustion cavity of a solid propellant rocket is still a low-loss acoustical cavity containing a very
large acoustical energy source, the combustion process itself. A small fraction of the energy released by
combustion is more than sufficient to drive pressure vibrations to an unacceptable level.
Combustion instability can occur spontaneously, often at some particular time during the motor burn
period, and the phenomenon is usually repeatable in identical motors. Both longitudinal and transverse
waves (radial and tangential) can occur. The pressure oscillations increase in magnitude, and the thrust
and burning rate also increase. The frequency seems to be a function of the cavity geometry, propellant
composition, pressure, and internal flame field. As the internal grain cavity is enlarged and local
velocities change, the oscillation often abates and disappears. The time and severity of the combustion
vibration tend to change with the ambient grain temperature prior to motor operation.
For a simple grain with a cylindrical port area, the resonant transverse mode oscillations (tangential and
radial) correspond roughly for liquid propellant thrust chambers. The longitudinal or axial modes, usually
at a lower frequency, are an acoustic wave traveling parallel to the motor axis between the forward end of
the perforation and the convergent nozzle section. Harmonic frequencies of these basic vibration modes
can also be excited. The internal cavities can become very complex and can include igniter cases,
movable as well as submerged nozzles, fins, cones, slots, star-shaped perforations, or other shapes, as
described in the section on grain geometry ,determination of the resonant frequencies of complex cavities
is not always easy. Furthermore, the geometry of the internal resonating cavity changes continually as the
burning propellant surfaces recede; as the cavity volume becomes larger, the transverse oscillation
frequencies are reduced.
The bulk mode, also known as the Helmholtz mode, L* mode, or chuffing mode, is not a wave mode as
described above. It occurs at relatively low frequencies (typically below 150 Hz and sometimes below 1
Hz), and the pressure is essentially uniform throughout the volume. The unsteady velocity is close to zero,
but the pressure rises and falls. It is the gas motion (in and out of the nozzle) that corresponds to the
classical Helmholtz resonator mode, similar to exciting a tone when blowing across the open mouth of a
bottle . It occurs at low values of L* , sometimes during the ignition period, and disappears when the
motor internal volume becomes larger or the chamber pressure becomes higher. Chuffing is the periodic
low frequency discharge of a bushy, unsteady flame of short duration (typically less than 1 sec) followed
by periods of no visible flame, during which slow outgassing and vaporization of the solid propellant
accumulates hot gas in the chamber. The motor experiences spurts of combustion and consequent
pressure buildup followed by periods of nearly ambient pressure. This dormant period can extend for a
fraction of a second to a few seconds.
A useful method of visualizing unstable pressure waves is shown in Figs. It consists of a series of Fourier
analyses of the measured pressure vibration spectrum, each taken at a different time in the burning
duration and displayed at successive vertical positions on a time scale, providing a map of amplitude
versus frequency versus burning time. This figure shows a low-frequency axial mode and two tangential
modes, whose frequency is reduced in time by the enlargement of the cavity; it also shows the timing of
different vibrations, and their onset and demise.
The initiation or triggering of a particular vibration mode is still not well understood but has to do with
energetic combustion at the propellant surface.
A sudden change in pressure is known to be a trigger, such as when a piece of broken-off insulation or
unburned propellant flows through the nozzle and temporarily blocks all or a part of the nozzle area
(causing a momentary pressure rise).
The shifting balance between amplifying and damping factors changes during the burning operation and
this causes the growth and also the abatement of specific modes of vibration. The response of a solid
propellant describes the change in the gas mass production or energy release at the burning surface when
it is stimulated by pressure perturbations. When a momentary high pressure peak occurs on the surface, it
increases the instantaneous heat transfer and thus the burning rate, causing the mass flow from that
surface to also increase. Velocity perturbations along the burning surface are also believed to cause
changes in mass flow. Phenomena that contribute to amplifying the vibrations, or to gains in the acoustic
energy, are:
1. The dynamic response of the combustion process to a flow disturbance or the oscillations in the
burning rate. This combustion response can be determined from tests of T-burners. The response
function depends on the frequency of these perturbations and the propellant formulation. The
combustion response may not be in a phase with the disturbance. The effects of boundary layers on
velocity perturbations have been investigated.
2. The interactions of flow oscillation with the main flow, similar to the basis for the operation of
musical wind instruments or sirens.
3. The fluid dynamic influence of vortexes.
The propellant characteristics have a strong effect on the susceptibility to instability. Changes in the
binder, particle-size distribution, ratio of oxidizer to fuel, and burn-rate catalysts can all affect stability,
often in ways that are not predictable. All solid propellants can experience instability. As a part of
characterizing a new or modified propellant (e.g., determining its ballistic, mechanical, aging, and
performance characteristics), many companies now also evaluate it for its stability behavior, as described
below.
STRAND BURNER AND T-BURNER: In contrast with liquid rocket technology, an accepted
combustion stability rating procedure does not now exist for full-scale solid rockets. Undertaking stability
tests on large full-scale flight-hardware rocket motors is expensive, and therefore lower-cost methods,
such as subscale motors, T-burners, and other test equipment, have been used to assess motor stability.
The best known and most widely used method of gaining combustion stability- related data is the use of a
T-burner, an indirect, limited method that does not use a full-scale motor. Standard T-burner has a 1.5-in.
internal diameter double-ended cylindrical burner vented at its midpoint.
Venting can be through a sonic nozzle to the atmosphere or by a pipe connected to a surge tank which
maintains a constant level of pressure in the burner cavity. T-burner design and usage usually concentrate
on the portion of the frequency spectrum dealing with the transverse oscillations expected in a full-scale
motor. The desired acoustical frequency, to be imposed on the propellant charge as it burns, determines
the burner length (distance between closed ends).
The nozzle location, midway between the ends of the burner, minimizes attenuation of fundamental
longitudinal mode oscillations (in the propellant grain cavity). Theoretically, an acoustic pressure node
exists at the center and antinodes occur at the ends of the cavity. Acoustic velocity nodes are out of phase
with pressure waves and occur at the ends of the burner. Propellant charges are often in the shape of discs
or cups cemented to the end faces of the burner. The gas velocity in the burner cavity is kept intentionally
low (Mach 0.2 or less) compared with the velocity in a full-scale motor. This practice minimizes the
influence of velocity-coupled energy waves and allows the influence of pressure-coupled waves to be
more clearly recognized.
Use of the T-burner for assessing the stability of a full-scale solid rocket presupposes valid theoretical
models of the phenomena occurring in both the T-burner and the actual rocket motor; these theories are
still not fully validated.
In addition to assessing solid rocket motor combustion stability, the T burner also is used to evaluate new
propellant formulations and the importance of seemingly small changes in ingredients, such as a change
in aluminum powder particle size and oxidizer grind method.
Once instability has been observed or predicted in a given motor, the motor design has to fix the problem.
There is no sure method for selecting the right remedy, and none of the cures suggested below may work.
The usual alternatives are:
1. Changing the grain geometry to shift the frequencies away from the undesirable values. Sometimes,
changing fin locations, port cross-section profile, or number of slots has been successful.
2. Changing the propellant composition. Using aluminum as an additive has been most effective in
curing transverse instabilities, provided that the particle-size distribution of the aluminum oxide is
favorable to optimum damping at the distributed frequency. Changing size distribution and using
other particulates (Zr, A1203, or carbon particles) has been effective in some cases. Sometimes
changes in the binder have worked.
3. Adding some mechanical device for attenuating the unsteady gas motions or changing the natural
frequency of cavities. Various inert resonance rods, baffles, or paddles have been added, mostly as a
fix to an existing motor with observed instability. They can change the resonance frequencies of the
cavities, introduce additional viscous surface losses, but also cause extra inert mass and potential
problems with heat transfer or erosion.
Combustion instability has to be addressed during the design process, usually through a combination of
some mathematical simulation, understanding similar problems in other motors, studies of possible
changes, and supporting experimental work (e.g., T-burners, measuring particle-size distribution). Most
solid propellant rocket companies have in-house two and three-dimensional computer programs to
calculate the likely acoustic modes (axial, tangential, radial, and combinations of these) for a given
grain/motor, the initial and intermediate cavity geometries, and the combustion gas properties calculated
from thermochemical analysis. Data on combustion response (dynamic burn rate behavior) and damping
can be obtained from T-burner tests. Data on particle sizes can be estimated from prior experience or
plume measurements.
Estimates of nozzle losses, friction, or other damping need to be included. Depending on the balance
between gain and damping, it may be possible to arrive at conclusions on the grain's propensity to
instability for each specific instability mode that is analyzed. If unfavorable, either the grain geometry or
the propellant usually has to be modified. If favorable, full-scale motors have to be built and tested to
validate the predicted stable burning characteristics. There is always a trade-off between the amount of
work spent on extensive analysis, subscale experiments and computer programs (which will not always
guarantee a stable motor), and taking a chance that a retrofit will be needed after full-scale motors have
been tested. If the instability is not discovered until after the motor is in production, it is often difficult,
time consuming, and expensive to fix the problem.
Two general types of solid propellants are in use. The first, the so called double-base propellant, consists
of nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine, plus additives in small quantity. There is no separate fuel and
oxidizer. The molecules are unstable, and upon ignition break apart and rearrange themselves, liberating
large quantities of heat. These propellants lend themselves well to smaller rocket motors. They are often
processed and formed by extrusion methods, although casting has also been employed.
The other type of solid propellant is the composite. Here, separate fuel and oxidized chemicals are used,
intimately mixed in the solid grain. The oxidizer is usually ammonium nitrate, potassium chlorate, or
ammonium chlorate, and often comprises as much as four-fifths or more of the whole propellant mix. The
fuels used are hydrocarbons, such as asphaltic-type compounds, or plastics. Because the oxidizer has no
significant structural strength, the fuel must not only perform well but must also supply the necessary
form and rigidity to the grain. Much of the research in solid propellants is devoted to improving the
physical as well as the chemical properties of the fuel.
Ordinarily, in processing solid propellants the fuel and oxidizer components are separately prepared for
mixing, the oxidizer being a powder and the fuel a fluid of varying consistency. They are then blended
together under carefully controlled conditions and poured into the prepared rocket case as a viscous
semisolid. They are then caused to set in curing chambers under controlled temperature and pressure.
Solid propellants offer the advantage of minimum maintenance and instant readiness. However, the more
energetic solids may require carefully controlled storage conditions, and may offer handling problems in
the very large sizes, since the rocket must always be carried about fully loaded. Protection from
mechanical shocks or abrupt temperature changes that may crack the grain is essential.
UNIT V
PROPELLANT TYPES
A bipropellant rocket unit has two separate liquid propellants, an oxidizer and a fuel. They are stored
separately and are not mixed outside the combustion chamber. The majority of liquid propellant rockets
have been manufactured for bipropellant applications.
A monopropellant contains an oxidizing agent and combustible matter in a single substance. It may be a
mixture of several compounds or it may be a homogeneous material, such as hydrogen peroxide or
hydrazine.
Monopropellants are stable at ordinary atmospheric conditions but decompose and yield hot combustion
gases when heated or catalyzed.
A cold gas propellant (e.g., nitrogen) is stored at very high pressure, gives a low performance, allows a
simple system and is usually very reliable. It has been used for roll control and attitude control.
A cryogenic propellant is liquefied gas at low temperature, such as liquid oxygen (-183°C) or liquid
hydrogen (-253°C). Provisions for venting the storage tank and minimizing vaporization losses are
necessary with this type.
Storable propellants (e.g., nitric acid or gasoline) are liquid at ambient temperature and can be stored for
long periods in sealed tanks. Space storable propellants are liquid in the environment of space; this
storability depends on the specific tank design, thermal conditions, and tank pressure. An example is
ammonia.
A gelled propellant is a thixotropic liquid with a gelling additive. It behaves like a jelly or thick paint. It
will not spill or leak readily, can flow under pressure, will burn, and is safer in some respects.
Mission Definition: Purpose, function, and final objective of the mission of an overall system
are well defined and their implications well understood. There is an expressed need for the
mission, and the benefits are evident. The mission requirements are well defined. The payload,
flight regime, vehicle, launch environment, and operating conditions are established. The risks,
as perceived, appear acceptable. The project implementing the mission must have political,
economic, and institutional support with assured funding. The propulsion system requirements,
which are derived from mission definition, must be reasonable and must result in a viable
propulsion system.
Affordability (Cost): Life cycle costs are low. They are the sum of R&D costs, production
costs, facility costs, operating costs, and decommissioning costs, from inception to the retirement
of the system. Benefits of achieving the mission should appear to justify costs. Investment in
new facilities should be low. Few, if any, components should require expensive materials. For
attractive. No need to hire new, inexperienced personnel, who need to be trained and are more
likely to make expensive errors.
System Performance: The propulsion system is designed to optimize vehicle and system
performance, using the most appropriate and proven technology. Inert mass is reduced to a
practical minimum, using improved materials and better understanding of loads and stresses.
Residual (unused) propellant is minimal. Propellants have the highest practical specific impulse
without undue hazards, without excessive inert propulsion system mass, and with simple loading,
storing, and handling. Thrust-time profiles and number of restarts must be selected to optimize
the vehicle mission. Vehicles must operate with adequate performance for all the possible
conditions (pulsing, throttling, temperature excursions, etc.). Vehicles should be storable over a
specified lifetime. Will meet or exceed operational life. Performance parameters (e.g., chamber
pressure, ignition time, or nozzle area ratio) should be near optimum for the selected mission.
Vehicle should have adequate TVC. Plume characteristics are satisfactory.
Survivability (Safety): All hazards are well understood and known in detail. If failure occurs,
the risk of personnel injury, damage to equipment, facilities, or the environment is minimal.
Certain mishaps or failures will result in a change in the operating condition or the safe shutdown
of the propulsion system. Applicable safety standards must be obeyed. Inadvertent energy input
to the propulsion system (e.g., bullet impact, external fire) should not result in a detonation. The
probability for any such drastic failures should be very low. Safety monitoring and inspections
must have proven effective in identifying and preventing a significant share of possible incipient
failures. Adequate safety factors must be included in the design. Spilled liquid propellants should
cause no undue hazards. All systems and procedures must conform to the safety standards.
Launch test range has accepted the system as being safe enough to launch.
Controllability: Thrust buildup and decay are within specified limits. Combustion process is
stable. The time responses to control or command signals are within acceptable tolerances.
Controls need to be foolproof and not inadvertently create a hazardous condition. Thrust vector
control response must be satisfactory. Mixture ratio control must assure nearly simultaneous
emptying of the fuel and oxidizer tanks. Thrust from and duration of afterburning should be
negligible. Accurate thrust termination feature must allow selection of final velocity of flight.
Changing to an alternate mission profile should be feasible. Liquid propellant sloshing and pipe
oscillations need to be adequately controlled. In a zero-gravity environment, a propellant tank
should be essentially fully emptied.
Maintainability: Simple servicing, foolproof adjustments, easy parts replacement, and fast,
reliable diagnosis of internal failures or problems. Minimal hazard to service personnel. There
must be easy access to all components that need to be checked, inspected, or replaced. Trained
maintenance personnel are available. Good access to items which need maintenance.
Geometric Constraints: Propulsion system fits into vehicle, can meet available volume,
specified length, or vehicle diameter. There is usually an advantage for the propulsion system
that has the smallest volume or the highest average density. If the travel of the center of gravity
has to be controlled, as is necessary in some missions, the propulsion system that can do so with
minimum weight and complexity will be preferred.
Prior Related Experience: There is a favorable history and valid, available, relevant data of
similar propulsion systems supporting the practicality of the technologies, manufacturability,
performance, and reliability. Experience and data validating computer simulation programs are
available. Experienced, skilled personnel are available.
Operability: Simple to operate. Validated operating manuals exist. Procedures for loading
propellants, arming the power supply, launching, igniter checkout, and so on, must be simple. If
applicable, a reliable automatic status monitoring and check-out system should be available.
Crew training needs to be minimal. Should be able to ship the loaded vehicle on public roads or
railroads without need for environmental permits and without the need for a decontamination
unit and crew to accompany the shipment. Supply of spare parts must be assured. Should be able
to operate under certain emergency and overload conditions.
Producibility: Easy to manufacture, inspect, and assemble. All key manufacturing processes are
well understood. All materials are well characterized, critical material properties are well known,
and the system can be readily inspected. Proven vendors for key components have been qualified.
Uses standard manufacturing machinery and relatively simple tooling. Hardware quality and
propellant properties must be repeatable. Scrap should be minimal. Designs must make good use
of standard materials, parts, common fasteners, and off-the-shelf components. There should be
maximum use of existing manufacturing facilities and equipment. Excellent reproducibility, i.e.,
minimal operational variation between identical propulsion units. Validated specifications should
be available for major manufacturing processes, inspection, parts fabrication, and assembly.
Schedule: The overall mission can be accomplished on a time schedule that allows the system
benefits to be realized. R&D, qualification, flight testing, and/or initial operating capability are
completed on a preplanned schedule. No unforeseen delays. Critical materials and qualified
suppliers must be readily available.
Reusability: Some applications (e.g., Shuttle main engine, Shuttle solid rocket booster, or
aircraft rocket assisted altitude boost) require a reusable rocket engine. The number of flights,
serviceability, and the total cumulative firing time then become key requirements that will need
to be demonstrated. Fatigue failure and cumulative thermal stress cycles can be critical in some
of the system components. The critical components have been properly identified; methods,
instruments, and equipment exist for careful check-out and inspection after a flight or test (e.g.,
certain leak tests, inspections for cracks, bearing clearances, etc.). Replacement and/or repair of
unsatisfactory parts should be readily possible. Number of firings before disassembly should be
large, and time interval between overhauls should be long.
Other Criteria: Radio signal attenuation by exhaust plume to be low. A complete propulsion
system, loaded with propellants and pressurizing fluids, can be storable for a required number of
years without deterioration or subsequent performance decrease. Interface problems are minimal.
Provisions for safe packaging and shipment are available. The system includes features that
allow decommissioning (such as to deorbit a spent satellite) or disposal (such as the safe removal
and disposal of over-age propellant from a refurbishable rocket motor).
INJECTOR: The functions of the injector are similar to those of a carburetor of an internal
combustion engine. The injector has to introduce and meter the flow of liquid propellants to the
combustion chamber, cause the liquids to be broken up into small droplets (a process called
atomization), and distribute and mix the propellants in such a manner that a correctly
proportioned mixture of fuel and oxidizer will result, with uniform propellant mass flow and
composition over the chamber cross section. This has been accomplished with different types of
injector designs and elements; several common types are shown in Fig. 4.1 and complete
injectors are shown in Fig. 4.2.
The injection hole pattern on the face of the injector is closely related to the internal manifolds
or feed passages within the injector. These provide for the distribution of the propellant from the
injector inlet to all the injection holes. A large complex manifold volume allows low passage
velocities and good distribution of flow over the cross section of the chamber. A small manifold
volume allows for a lighter weight injector and reduces the amount of "dribble" flow after the
main valves are shut. The higher passage velocities cause a more uneven flow through different
identical injection holes and thus a poorer distribution and wider local gas composition variation.
Dribbling results in afterburning, which is an inefficient irregular combustion that gives a little
"cutoff" thrust after valve closing. For applications with very accurate terminal vehicle velocity
requirements, the cutoff impulse has to be very small and reproducible and often valves are built
into the injector to minimize passage volume.
The coaxial hollow post injector has been used for liquid oxygen and gaseous hydrogen
injectors by most domestic and foreign rocket designers. It is shown in the lower left of Fig. 4.1.
It works well when the liquid hydrogen has absorbed heat from cooling jackets and has been
gasified. This gasified hydrogen flows at high speed (typically 330 m/sec or 1000 ft/sec); the
liquid oxygen flows far more slowly (usually at less than 33 m/sec or 100 ft/sec) and the
differential velocity causes a shear action, which helps to break up the oxygen stream into small
droplets. The injector has a multiplicity of these coaxial posts on its face. This type of injector is
not used with liquid storable bipropellants, in part because the pressure drop to achieve high
velocity would become too high.
Figure 4.1 Schematic diagrams of several injector types. The movable sleeve type variable thrust
injector
The SSME injector uses 600 concentric sleeve injection elements; 75 of them have been
lengthened beyond the injector face to form cooled baffles, which reduce the incidence of
combustion instability.
pg. 144
Figure 4.2 Injector with 90° self-impinging (fuel-against-fuel and oxidizer-against oxidizer) -
type countersunk doublet injection pattern. Large holes are inlets to fuel manifolds. Pre-drilled
rings are brazed alternately over an annular fuel manifold or groove and a similar adjacent
oxidizer manifold or groove.
The original method of making injection holes was to carefully drill them and round out or
chamfer their inlets. This is still being done today. It is difficult to align these holes accurately
(for good impingement) and to avoid burrs and surface irregularities. One method that avoids
these problems and allows a large number of small accurate injecton orifices is to use multiple
etched, very thin plates (often called platelets) that are then stacked and diffusion bonded
together to form a monolithic structure as shown in Fig.4. 3. The photo-etched pattern on each of
the individual plates or metal sheets then provides not only for many small injection orifices at
the injector face, but also for internal distribution or flow passages in the injector and sometimes
also for a fine-mesh filter inside the injector body. The platelets can be stacked parallel to or
normal to the injector face. The finished injector has been called the platelet injector and has
been patented by the Aero jet Propulsion Company.
Figure 4.3 Simplified diagrams of two types of injector using a bonded platelet construction
technique: (a) injector for low thrust with four impinging unlike doublet liquid streams; the
individual plates are parallel to the injector face; (b) Like-on-like impinging stream injector with 144
orifices; plates are perpendicular to the injector face.
Figure 4.4 Design options of fed systems for liquid propellant rocket engines. The more common
types are designated with a double line at the bottom of the box.
The propellant feed system has two principal functions: to raise the pressure of the
propellants and to feed them to one or more thrust chambers. The energy for these functions comes
either from a high- pressure gas, centrifugal pumps, or a combination of the two. The selection of a
particular feed system and its components is governed primarily by the application of the rocket,
duration, number or type of thrust chambers, past experience, mission, and by general requirements
of simplicity of design, ease of manufacture, low cost, and minimum inert mass. A classification of
several of the more important types of feed system is shown in Fig. 4.4 and some are discussed in
more detail below. All feed systems have piping, a series of valves, provisions for filling and
removing (draining and flushing) the liquid propellants, and control devices to initiate, stop, and
regulate their flow and operation.
In general, a pressure feed system gives a vehicle performance superior to a turbo pump
system when the total impulse or the mass of propellant is relatively low, the chamber pressure is
low, the engine thrust-to-weight ratio is low (usually less than 0.6), and when there are repeated
short-duration thrust pulses; the heavy-walled tanks for the propellant and the pressurizing gas
usually constitute the major inert mass of the engine system. In a turbo pump feed systems the
propellant tank pressures are much lower (by a factor of 10 to 40) and thus the tank masses are much
lower (again by a factor of 10 to 40).
Turbo pump systems usually give a superior vehicle performance when the total impulse is
large (higher Au) and the chamber pressure is higher. The pressurized feed system can be relatively
simple, such as for a single operation, factory-preloaded, simple unit (with burst diaphragms instead
of some of the valves), or quite complex, as with multiple restartable thrusters or reusable systems. If
the propulsion system is to be reusable or is part of a manned vehicle (where the reliability
requirements are very high and the vehicle's crew can monitor and override automatic commands),
the feed system becomes more complex (with more safety features and redundancies) and more
expensive.
The pneumatic (pressurizing gas) and hydraulic (propellant) flows in a liquid propellant
engine can be simulated in a computer analysis that provides for a flow and pressure balance in the
oxidizer and the fuel flow paths through the system. Some of these analyses can provide information
on transient conditions (filling up of passages) during start, flow decays at cutoff, possible water
hammer, or flow instabilities.
Liquid rocket engines developed for space missions encompass a wide spectrum of performance and
structural requirements.
Thrust levels may vary from a few Newtons to many thousands of Newtons, with burning time from
fraction of a second to hours. In all these engines, the energy released by the propellants must be
contained inside the thrust chamber and accelerated through the nozzle to extract the thrust.
Extremely high heat flux levels and temperature gradients are present not only in the immediate
vicinity of the injector head, but also in the nozzle throat region.
It is seen that the maximum heat flux occurs in the close proximity to nozzle throat, and an effective
cooling of the throat area is crucial for enhanced reliability and reusability. Regenerative cooling is the
standard cooling system for almost all modern main stage, booster, and upper stage engines. Different
cooling techniques such as film cooling, transpiration cooling, ablative cooling, radiation cooling, heat
sink cooling and dump cooling have been developed in the past to reduce regenerative cooling load
and propellant requirements. Film cooling can be employed either at the combustion chamber or at the
nozzle of a rocket engine.
Liquid film cooling with fuel or oxidizer as the coolant can be employed in the combustion chambers
of gas generator/expander/staged combustion cycle engines. In case of gas generator cycle, the turbine
exhaust gas can be used as a gaseous film coolant in the combustion chamber or nozzle sections. It is
found that all these methods lead to reduced wall temperatures. The mechanism by which film
cooling maintains a lower combustor wall temperature is considerably different from that of
convective cooling. Film cooling is accomplished by interposing a layer of coolant fluid between the
surface to be protected and the hot gas stream. The fluid is introduced directly into the combustion
chamber through slots or holes and is directed along the walls (Figure 4.5). A typical temperature
distribution from the hot combustion gases to the exterior of the chamber wall in a film cooled
Combustion chamber is shown in Figure 4.6. It can be observed that the coolant film produces a
thermal insulation effect and reduces the chamber wall temperature. Coolant film may be generated
by injecting liquid fuel or oxidizer through wall slots or holes in the combustion chamber, or through
the propellant injector. The cooling effect will persist up to the throat region in the case of a shorter
combustion chamber. In a fully film-cooled design, injection points are located at incremental
distances along the wall length.
In liquid film cooling, the vaporized film coolant does not diffuse rapidly into the main gas stream
but persists as a protective layer of vapor adjacent to the wall for an appreciable distance downstream
from the terminus of the liquid film. The film coolant also forms a protective film which restricts the
transport of the combustion products to the wall, thus reducing the rate of oxidation of the walls.
Figure 4.6 Typical temperature distribution of combustion chamber across wall
If the process of rocket combustion is not controlled (by proper design), then combustion instabilities
can occur which can very quickly cause excessive pressure vibration forces (which may break engine
parts) or excessive heat transfer (which may melt thrust chamber parts). The aim is to prevent
occurrence of this instability and to maintain reliable operation.
Although much progress has been made in understanding and avoiding combustion instability, new
rocket engines can still be plagued by it.
Table below lists the principal types of combustion vibrations encountered in liquid rocket thrust
chambers .Admittedly, combustion in a liquid rocket is never perfectly smooth; some fluctuations of
pressure, temperature, and velocity are always present. When these fluctuations interact with the
natural frequencies of the propellant feed system (with and without vehicle structure) or the chamber
acoustics, periodic superimposed oscillations, recognized as instability, occur. In normal rocket
practice smooth combustion occurs when pressure fluctuations during steady operation do not exceed
about -t-5% of the mean chamber pressure. Combustion that gives greater pressure fluctuations at a
chamber wall location which occur at completely random intervals is called rough combustion.
Unstable combustion, or combustion instability, displays organized oscillations occurring at well-
defined intervals with a pressure peak that may be maintained, may increase, or may die out. These
periodic peaks, representing fairly large concentrations of vibratory energy, can be easily recognized
against the random-noise background in fig 4.7.
Fig. 4.7 Typical oscillogrpah traces of chamber pressure Pl with time for different combustion events.
Rocket propulsion concepts in which one component of the propellant is stored in liquid phase while the other
is stored in solid phase are called hybrid propulsion systems. Such systems most commonly employ a liquid
oxidizer and solid fuel. Various combinations of solid fuels and liquid oxidizers as well as liquid fuels and
solid oxidizers have been experimentally evaluated for use in hybrid rocket motors. Most common is the liquid
oxidizer-solid fuel concept shown in Fig. 4.8. Illustrated here is a large pressure-fed hybrid booster
configuration. The means of pressurizing the liquid oxidizer is not an important element of hybrid technology
and a turbo pump system could also perform this task. $ The oxidizer can be either a non-cryogenic (storable)
or a cryogenic liquid, depending on the application requirements.
In this hybrid motor concept, oxidizer is injected into a pre combustion or vaporization chamber upstream of
the primary fuel grain. The fuel grain contains numerous axial combustion ports that generate fuel vapor to
react with the injected oxidizer. An aft mixing chamber is employed to ensure that all fuel and oxidizer are
burned before exiting the nozzle.
The main advantages of a hybrid rocket propulsion system are:
(1) Safety during fabrication, storage, or operation without any possibility of explosion or detonation;
(2) start-stop-restart capabilities;
(3) Relatively low system cost;
(4) Higher specific impulse than solid rocket motors and higher density-specific impulse than liquid
bipropellant engines; and
(5) The ability to smoothly change motor thrust over a wide range on demand.
The hybrid is inherently safer than other rocket designs. The idea is to store the oxidizer as a liquid and the fuel
as a solid, producing a design that is less susceptible to chemical explosion than conventional solid and bi-
propellant liquid designs. The fuel is contained within the rocket combustion chamber in the form of a cylinder
with a circular channel called a port hollowed out along its axis. Upon ignition, a di ffusion flame forms over
the fuel surface along the length of the port. The combustion is sustained by heat transfer from the flame to the
solid fuel causing continuous fuel vaporization until the oxidizer flow is turned off. In the event of a structural
failure, oxidizer and fuel cannot mix intimately leading to a catastrophic explosion that might endanger
personnel or destroy a launch pad.
The hybrid rocket requires one rather than two liquid containment and delivery systems. The
complexity is further reduced by omission of a regenerative cooling system for both the chamber and nozzle.
Throttling control in a hybrid is simpler because it alleviates the requirement to match the momenta of the dual
propellant streams during the mixing process. Throttle ratios up to 10 have been common in hybrid motors.
The fact that the fuel is in the solid phase makes it very easy to add performance enhancing materials to the
fuel such as aluminum powder. In principle, this could enable the hybrid to gain an I sp advantage over a
comparable hydrocarbon fueled liquid system.
The process in a hybrid rocket combustion chamber over a large portion of the chamber constitutes
the diffusive combustion in the boundary layer very close to the regressing fuel surface. The initial
part is dominated by processes of impingement of the liquid oxidizer (which is sprayed by an injector)
on the fuel surface and its vaporisation .Since the process is essentially diffusion-dominated, chemical
kinetics, and therefore pressure, have a relatively smaller effect. It is the flux of hot gases (consisting
of the products of combustion and oxidizer not yet utilised) past the fuel surface which primarily
affects the regression of the fuel. The regression rate law can be deduced from the boundary layer
considerations as was first accomplished by Marxman & Gilbert (1963). The law reads that rh=aG',
where G is the mass flux of hot gases past the surface, a and n are constants; typically a 0.01--0.03
cm/s (flux) n, n=0.5 for laminar flow and 0.8 for turbulent flow.
Now it is possible to explain some features of hybrid engines. First, the O/F of a hybrid engine is not
necessarily constant throughout the firing. Using the expression, we can express O/F in terms of the
inner diameter of the cylindrical fuel block burning from inside outwards as
Where d=inner diameter of the port and L is the length of the fuel block. If n=0.5, as in the ease of
laminar flow, O/F is a constant and does not change during the firing; and if n =0.8, as in the case of
turbulent flow, the value of O/F increases during the firing, showing that the products become
oxidiser-rich. This, in fact, causes changes in the specific impulse of the system during the firing.
There are ways of combating this problem (see Anon 1964). One of these is to fix the initial operating
point on a slightly fuel-rich side so that when the operating point moves to the oxidiser-rich side, the
specific impulse does not vary by more than 1-2 Yo. Another technique which maintains a constant
O/F level is to use two oxidiser injection points, one near the head end and the other near the aft end.
In the early part of the firing the burning is fuel-rich and aft end injection is used to optimize it.
During the later part of the firing the products of combustion from the end of the fuel block tend
towards oxidiser-richness and so aft-end injection is reduced to maintain the same O/F level.
The second feature concerns the low explosion hazard during storage, transportation and firing. That
the explosion and fire hazard are small compared to that for a solid rocket is easy to appreciate
because the solid rocket has the fuel and oxidizer imbedded in the same matrix whereas the hybrid has
the solid fuel and liquid oxidizer separately stored. And in the event of an accidental initiation, the
former can burn by itself, whereas the fuel in the hybrid rocket has to receive oxidiser for its
combustion.
The fire hazard of the hybrid is smaller than of liquids because, in the event of an explosion, the
liquids of a liquid rocket can flow, widely spread and get mixed up, while the fuel and oxidiser in the
hybrid have greater resistance to large scale mixing since the fuel is in the form of a solid.
We can further argue that a crack or a tiny hole in the fuel block of a hybrid causes little or no change
in the performance, whereas the same crack or hole in a solid propellant may cause explosion. To
appreciate this we notice that the regression of the fuel occurs under the action of a heat flux from the
diffusion flame. Thus any area of the fuel which receives less heat flux will regress less. The tiny hole
represents a zone which is farther away from the flame and hence receives less heat flux and so will
regress less. This means that the tiny hole evens out instead of becoming larger as in a solid rocket
and the perturbation due to changed mass flow becomes small as burning progresses.
The third feature concerns the sensitivity of the regression rate to the nature of fuel. It has already
been noted that addition of even a small amount of some compounds can disastrously alter the
burning rate of a solid propellant. The situation is quite the opposite in the case of hybrids. The
regression rate is negligibly dependent on the nature of fuels, even when they are as different as
polystyrene and natural rubber or polybutadiene. The reason for this lies in the counter-balancing
effect called 'blowing effect'. This effect is simply that the burning rate does not linearly scale with
the ratio of the input heat flux to heat of phase transformation at the surface, but less (in fact, much
less) strongly dependent on it. If we invoke the heat balance at the surface of the burning fuel, we
have
where (Ah), is the heat of phase change at the surface (including that needed for degradation) and q",
the heat flux into the surface. Now, if by some mechanism rh increases by decrease of (Ah)~, this
increase in rn causes an increase in boundary layer thickness, hence, reduction in gradients at the
surface and in heat flux. The net result is of course, an increase in regression rate but much less than is
to be expected from the linear relation. This effect is so significant that a 10 ~o increase in q" leaves
rn virtually unaltered. Even a 35~o increase in q" causes only a 10~o increase in the regression rate
(Marxman & Gilbert 1963).
Similar arguments can be used to explain why the initial temperature change causes much less change
in the regression rate of a hybrid fuel than in the burning rate of a solid propellant.
• End result:
Each propellant combination has an upper and lower limit for the mass flux beyond which the
model is not applicable.
• High mass fluxes Kinetic effects (Pressure dependency via the gas phase rxn rates)
• Low mass fluxes Radiation effects (Pressure dependency via the radiation effects)
• Transition to laminar boundary layer
• Cooking of the propellant (at very low regression rates)
• Dilution of the oxidizer
Figure 4.11 Effect of Pressure on the Regression Rate
The heat conduction equation in the solid in reference of frame fixed to the regressing surface