APhO2002 Theory Sol
APhO2002 Theory Sol
APhO2002 Theory Sol
Solution 1
(a) mX&& n= S ( X n+1 − X n ) − S ( X n − X n−1 ). 0.7
(b) Let Xn = A sin nka cos (ω t + α), which has a harmonic time dependence.
By analogy with the spring, the acceleration is X&& = - ω2Xn. n
Substitute into (a): -mAω2 sin nka = AS {sin (n + 1)ka – 2 sin nka + sin (n – 1)ka}
= - 4SA sin nka sin2 _ka. 0.6
Hence ω = (4S/m) sin _ka.
2 2
0.2
To determine the allowed values of k, use the boundary condition sin (N + 1) ka = sin kL = 0. 0.7
The allowed wave numbers are given by kL = π, 2π, 3π,…, Nπ (N in all), 0.3
and their corresponding frequencies can be computed from ω = ω0 sin _ka,
in which ωmax = ω0 = 2(S/m)_ is the maximum allowed frequency. 0.4
∞
∑ ph ω P (ω )
p =0
p
(c) E (ω ) = ∞
∑ P (ω )
p =0
p
∑ nh ω e − nh ω / k B T
∂ ∞
First method: n =0
∞
= k BT 2 ln ∑ e − nh ω / k BT 1.5
∂T n = 0
∑
n =0
e − nh ω / k BT
(0.5)
Alternatively: denominator is a geometric series = {1 – e − hω / k BT }-1
1
A non-calculus method:
Let D = 1 + e-x + e-2x + e-3x +…, where x = hω/kBT. This is a geometric series and equals D =
1/(1 – e-x). Let N = e-x +2 e-2x + 3e-3x +…. The result we want is N/D. Observe
(2.0)
D – 1= e-x + e-2x + e-3x + e-4x + e-5x +….….
(D - 1)e-x = e-2x + e-3x + e-4x + e-5x +….….
-2x
(D - 1)e = e-3x + e-4x + e-5x +….
e−x 1
Hence N = (D - 1)D or N/D = D – 1 = −x
= x .
1− e e −1
(d) From part (b), the allowed k values are π/L, 2π/L, …, Nπ/L.
Hence the spacing between allowed k values is π/L, so there are (L/π)∆k allowed modes in the 1.0
wave-number interval ∆k (assuming ∆k >> π/L).
(e) Since the allowed k are π/L,…, Nπ/L, there are N modes. 0.5
Follow the problem: 0.5
dω/dk = _aω0 cos _ka from part (a) & (b)
= 1a
2
ω max − ω
2 2
, ωmax = ω0. This second form is more convenient for integration.
The number of modes dn in the interval dω is
dn = (L/π)∆k = (L/π) (dk/dω) dω 0.5 for eith
= (L /π){_ aω0 cos _ ka}-1 dω
This part is
L 2 1 necessary fo
= dω
π a ω max − ω 2
2 ET below,
(f) Observe first from the last formula that ET increases monotonically with temperature since
2
{e hω/kT - 1}-1 is increasing with T. 0.2
When T → 0, the term – 1 in the last result may be neglected in the denominator so 0.2
2N 1 0.3
π ∫
ET ≈ T → 0 hω e − hω / k BT dω
ω max
2
−ω 2
∞
2N xe − x 0.2
= (k BT ) 2 ∫ dx
hπω max 0 1 − ( k B Tx / h ω max ) 2
which is linear; hence CV → NkB = R, the universal gas constant. This is the Dulong-Petit rule.
hω / k T
Alternatively, if the summation is retained, write denominator as e B − 1 ≈ hω / k B T and (0.2)
2N ∆ω
ET → T → ∞ k BT ∑ which is linear in T, so CV is constant.
π ω ω max
2
−ω 2
approaches constant
R value
linear in T T
3
Answer sheet: Question 1
(b) Angular frequencies ω of the chain’s vibration modes are given by the equation:
4
(f) The average energy per frequency mode ω of the crystal is given by:
hω
E (ω ) = hω / k BT
e −1
(g) There are how many allowed modes in a wave number interval ∆k?
(L/π)∆k.
Linear in T T
5
Solution to Question 2: The Rail Gun
Equating (1) and (2), & substituting for Fc & dividing by m, we obtain the acceleration
6
(b)(i)
Since initial velocity of rod = 0, and let velocity of rod at time t be v(t),
we have
( )
v (t ) = v∞ 1 − e − t / τ , (3) 0.5
IR mg
where v ∞ (θ ) = ατ = 1 − sin θ .
BL BLI
Let ts be the total time he spent moving along the rail, and vs be his velocity when he leaves
the rail, i.e. 0.5
( )
v s = v(t s ) = v ∞ 1 − e − t s / τ . (4)
7
(b) (ii)
Let tf be the time in flight:
2v s sin è
tf = (6) 0.5
g
w = (v s cos è )t f (7)
w 2v sin θ
tf = = s (8) (from (6) & (7))
v s cosθ g 0.5
From (8), vs is fixed by the angle θ and the width of the strait w
gw
vs = . (9)
sin 2θ
1 gw
∴ t s = −τ ln1 − ,
(Substitute (9) in (5))
v∞ sin 2θ 1.5
2 sin θ gw 2w tan θ
And tf = = (Substitute (9) in (8)) 0.5
g sin 2θ g
8
(c)
Therefore, total time is: T = t s + t f = −τ ln1 −
1 gw + 2w tan θ
sin 2θ
v∞ g
mR (80)(1.0)
Then τ = 2 2
= = 0.20 s.
B L (10.0) 2 (2.00) 2
2424 (80)(10)
v∞ (θ ) = 1 − sin θ
(10.0)( 2.00) (10.0)(2.00)(2424)
= 121(1 − 0.0165 sin θ )
So,
100 1
T = t s + t f = −0.20 ln1 − + 14.14 tan θ Labeling:
v ∞ sin 2θ 0.1 each axis
Proper Range in
θ:
0.3 lower limit
(more than 0.37,
less than 0.5),
0.2 upper limit
(more than 0.5
and less than 0.6)
Proper shape of
Note that the lower bound for the range of θ to plot may be determined by the curve: 0.2
condition vs / v∞ <1 (or the argument of ln is positive), and since mg/BLI is small
Accurate
(0.0165), v∞ ≈ IR/BL (= 121 m/s), we have the condition sin(2θ) > 0.68, i.e.
intersection at
θ > 0.37. So one may start plotting from θ = 0.38. θ = 0.5: 0.4 1.5
From the graph, for θ within the range (~0.38, 0.505 ) radian the time T is within
11 s.
9
(d)
However, there is another constraint, i.e. the length of rail D. Let Ds be the
distance travelled during the time interval ts
ts
0
ts
( ) (
Ds = ∫ v(t )dt =v ∞ ∫ 1 − e −t / τ dt =v ∞ t + τe − βt
0
)
ts
0 [ ( )]
= v ∞ t s − τ 1 − e − βt = v∞ t s − v(t s )τ
i.e.
1 gw gw 0.5
Ds = −τ v ∞ (θ ) ln1 − +
v∞ (θ ) sin 2θ sin 2θ
Labeling:
The graph below shows Ds as a function of θ. 0.1 each axis
Unit:
0.1 each axis
Proper Range in
θ:
0.3 lower limit
(more than 0.4,
less than 0.49),
0.2 upper limit
(more than 0.51
and less than 1.1)
It is necessary that Ds ≤ D, which means θ must range between .5 and1.06
radians. Proper shape of
curve: 0.2
Accurate
intersection at
θ = 0.5: 0.4
In order to satisfy both conditions, θ must range between 0.5 & 0.505 radians.
10
11
Alternate Solution (Not taking induced emf into consideration):
∴ v(t ) = αt 0.1
0.2
and ∴ v s = v (t s ) = α t s
α 2 t s sin 2è
2
w = (v s cos è )t f = ,
g
giving
1 gw
ts =
α sin 2è 0.5
and
2w tan θ
tf = .
g 0.5
Hence,
α
1 + 2 sin θ
1 gw 2w tan θ wg g .
T = ts + t f = + =
α sin 2è g α sin 2è
12
Labeling:
0.1 each axis
Unit:
0.1 each axis
Proper Range in
θ:
0.1 lower limit
(more than 0,
less than 0.5),
0.2 upper limit
(more than 0.52
For θ within the range (~0, 0.52 ) radian the time T is within 11 s. and less than 0.8)
Proper shape of
curve: 0.2
Accurate
intersection at
θ = 0.52: 0.4 1.3
Proper shape of
It is necessary that Ds ≤ D, which means θ must range between 0.11 and curve: 0.2
1.43 radians. Accurate
intersection at
1.2
θ = 0.11: 0.4
In order to satisfy both conditions, θ must range between 0.11 & 0.52
0.5
radians.
13
Question 3 - Marking Scheme
3/ 2
M
Since W (v ) = 4π v 2 e− M v
2
/ ( 2 RT )
(a) ,
2π RT
∞
v = ∫ v W (v) dv =
0
∞ 3/ 2
M
= ∫ v 4π v2 e−M v
2
/ ( 2 RT )
dv
0 2 π R T
∞ 3/ 2
M
= ∫ 4π v3 e− M v
2
/ ( 2 RT )
dv
0 2π RT
3/ 2 ∞
M
= 4π ∫ v3 e− M v
2
/ ( 2 RT )
dv
2π RT 0
3/ 2
M 4 R2 T 2
= 4π
2π RT 2M2
8RT
=
π M
Marking Scheme:
14
(b) Assuming an ideal gas, P V = N k T , so that the concentration of the gas
molecules, n, is given by
N P
n = =
V k T
1
J = nv
4
1 P 8RT
=
4 k T π M
8RT
= P
16 k 2 T 2π M
N Ak
= P
2 k Tπ M
2
1
= P
2 k Tπ m
P
=
2 π mk T
M
where we have note that R = N A k and m = ( N A being Avogadro number).
NA
Marking Scheme:
15
(c ) Assuming close packing, there are approximately 4 molecules in an area of 16 r 2
m2. Thus, the number of molecules in 1 m2 is given by
4
n1 = = 1.9 × 1018 m-2
(
16 3.6 × 10 −10 )2
However at (273 + 300) K and 133 Pa, the impingement rate for oxygen is
P
J =
2 π mk T
133
=
32 × 10 −3
2π (1.38 × 10 −23 ) 573
6.02 × 10 23
= 2.6 × 10 24 m −2 s −1
n1
Therefore, the time needed for the deposition is = 0.7 ms
J
The calculated time is too short compared with the actual processing.
Marking Scheme:
16
(d) With activation energy of 1 eV and letting the velocity of the oxygen molecule at
this energy is v1, we have
1
m v12 = 1.6 × 10 −19 J
2
⇒ v1 = 2453.57 ms −1
At a temperature of 573 K, the distribution of the gas molecules is
We can estimate the fraction of the molecules with speed greater than 2454 ms-1
using the trapezium rule (or any numerical techniques) with ordinates at 2453,
2453 + 500, 2453 +1000. The values are as follows:
Velocity, v Probability,
W(v)
Using trapezium rule, the fraction of molecules with speed greater than 2453 ms-1
is given by
fraction of molecules =
500
2
[( )( ) (
1.373 × 10 -10 + 2 × 2.256 ×10 −14 + 6.518 × 10 −19 )]
f = 3.43 × 10 −8
Thus the time needed for the deposition is given by 0.7 µs/(3.43 x 10-8) that is
20.4 s
Marking Scheme
17
λ′
(e) For destructive interference, optical path difference = 2 d = where
2
λair
λ′ = is the wavelength in the coating.
n
n = 1.4
d Coating
Silicon
Derive equation:
TOTAL 10 marks
18