Effects of Technology Advances Upon Public Child Welfare Middle Managers' Work/Life Balance

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 120

EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES UPON PUBLIC CHILD WELFARE

MIDDLE MANAGERS’ WORK/LIFE BALANCE

by

Gail P. McWhite Seymour

DAVID OWENS, PhD, Faculty Mentor and Chair

BETSY MCDOUGALL, PhD, Committee Member

TRACEE WASHINGTON, PhD, Committee Member

Elizabeth Koenig, JD, Dean, School of Public Service Leadership

A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment

Of the Requirements for the Degree

Doctor of Philosophy

Capella University

October 2016
ProQuest Number: 10239883

All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO ALL USERS


The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.

ProQuest 10239883

Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2016 ). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.

All rights reserved.


This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.

ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
© Gail P. McWhite Seymour, 2016
Abstract

The environment of public child welfare fosters a sense of vagueness regarding the boundary that

should create a balance between work and life for front line workers and middle management.

The boundary between work and life is further greyed by the requirement of “on-call” duties in

which employees are required to respond to the needs of those served at the time the need arises

even after commitments for normal working hours obligation are met. Technological

advancements, or Information Communication Technology (ICT) such as tablets and smart

phones have been lauded as tools to aid workers and managers in performing tasks more

efficiently. However, such technologies also allow access to employees at any time, regardless

of location and work hours. This practice can lead to work/life imbalance. Imbalance for work

and life can lead to negative consequences for employees and agencies. Therefore, it is

important for agencies to assess work practices that may create significant deficiencies in

work/life balance. Using a descriptive survey design to implement a quantitative non-

experimental methodology, this study examined the impact of technological advances use upon

work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers. A hierarchical multiple regression

was conducted and demonstrated a significant relationship between ICT use and work/life

imbalance for public child welfare middle managers. Furthermore, the data yielded a significant

relationship between work/life balance and stress.


Dedication

Faith, family, and friends, this dissertation is dedicated to those who believed in me,

encourage me, and most of all prayed for me throughout this journey. In loving memory of my

mother, Gracie Belle Lewis McWhite Hanes, I thank you for the many life lessons and

encouragements that have served as the catalyst to help me strive for excellence.

To my sister, Gwendolyn Perneil McWhite Allen, your undying love, and sacrifice have

not gone unnoticed and unappreciated. I will forever remain thankful to you for all that you have

done to ease this journey. To my sons, Roderick Dejuan and Rashad Derell Seymour, I can only

hope that I have served as an example to Helen Keller’s quote “the bend in the road does not

have to be the end of the road, unless you fail to take the turn.” Please sons, never let your past

determine your future; excellence is just one-step away, turn the corner. To my niece, Evelene

Elaine Brown, you have become my mighty prayer warrior during the last leg of this journey.

You have “called it into existence” and refused to accept anything different.

Finally, to my friends who served as my prayer warriors, Sharon Harris, Jarrita Jones, and

Regina Memmingers, through much prayer, fasting, and supplication, the race was run, not

swiftly, but successfully. He hears and answers prayers; thank you for all of your support.

iii
Acknowledgments

I am reminded of a scripture in the New Testament book of 1Thessalonians, the 5th

chapter, and 18th verse that references giving thanks in all things. Therefore, I must thank God

for this journey. I also want to thank a very special friend, Dr. Tamikia Lott, who encouraged

me to embark upon this journey, provided guidance, and support every step of the way. You are

truly a blessing and I am grateful to call you friend.

To my mentor, Dr. David Owens, you have the patience of Job. We have been in this

journey for a while, yet you have provided substantive guidance and support that facilitated the

necessary movement through this journey. My committee members, Dr. Betsy McDougall and

Dr. Tracee Washington, are thanked for their time and support.

To my former colleagues, the “Dream Team”, thank you for all of your encouragement

and support. You pushed me when I wanted to stop and celebrated with me at each benchmark.

I am blessed to have worked with such a wonderful group of people, but even more blessed to

consider you as lifetime friends. To my current colleagues, thank you for your patience as I have

labored with the final portion of this journey. To my good friend, thank you for being a special

cheerleader and encourager, thank you for everything!

To all my family and friends who are too numerous to mention individually, thank you all

for your encouragement, belief, and support. Thank you to all of the child welfare professionals

who participated in this study.

iv
Table of Contents

Acknowledgments.................................................................................................. iv

List of Tables ........................................................................................................ vii

List of Figures ...................................................................................................... viii

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................1

Statement of the Problem .........................................................................................6

Purpose of the Study ................................................................................................8

Significance of the Study .......................................................................................10

Research Questions ................................................................................................11

Definition of Terms................................................................................................13

Research Design.....................................................................................................14

Assumptions and Limitations ................................................................................16

Organization of the Remainder of the Study .........................................................22

CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ...........................................................................23

Introduction ............................................................................................................23

Methods of Searching ............................................................................................24

Theoretical Orientation for the Study ....................................................................25

Review of the Literature ........................................................................................30

Critique of Previous Research Methods ................................................................39

Summary ................................................................................................................40

CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................42

Research Questions and Hypotheses .....................................................................43

Research Design.....................................................................................................45

v
Target Population and Sample ...............................................................................45

Procedures ..............................................................................................................48

Instruments .............................................................................................................54

Ethical Considerations ...........................................................................................60

Summary ................................................................................................................62

CHAPTER 4. RESULTS ...................................................................................................63

Description of the Sample ......................................................................................65

Hypothesis Testing.................................................................................................73

Summary ................................................................................................................82

CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION, IMPLICATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS ....................84

Summary of the Results .........................................................................................85

Discussion of the Results .......................................................................................88

Conclusions Based on the Results .........................................................................90

Limitations .............................................................................................................93

Implications for Practice ........................................................................................94

Recommendations for Further Research ................................................................95

Conclusion .............................................................................................................96

REFERENCES ......................................................................................................98

STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL WORK ..........................................................................109

vi
List of Tables

Table 1. Research Questions, Independent/Dependent Variables ....................................54

Table 2. Reliability Coefficients .......................................................................................59

Table 3. Manager Generation ...........................................................................................66

Table 4. Years of Overall Work Experience .....................................................................66

Table 5. Years Working in Current Job ...........................................................................67

Table 6. Years of Supervisory Experience in Public Child Welfare ................................68

Table 7. Number of Children and Their Ages ..................................................................68

Table 8. Number of Hours Engaged in Work-Related Activities .....................................69

Table 9. Descriptive Statistics ...........................................................................................70

Table 10. Skewness and Kurtosis Coefficients .................................................................70

Table 11. Regression Coefficients for Work/Life balance ...............................................78

Table 12. Regression Coefficients for Perceived stress .....................................................81

Table 13. Summary of All Hypotheses Tested ..................................................................82

vii
List of Figures

Figure 1. Sample Size Calculation for Proposed Analyses ................................................48

Figure 2. Histogram for Information Communication Technology Demands ...................71

Figure 3. Histogram Work/Life Balance ............................................................................72

Figure 4. Histogram for Perceived Stress ..........................................................................73

Figure 5. Normal Probability Plot of Residuals for Work/Life Balance ............................76

Figure 6. Scatterplot of Standardized Residuals for Work/Life Balance ...........................77

Figure 7. Normal Probability Plot of Residuals for Perceived Stress ................................79

Figure 8. Scatterplot of Standardized Residuals for Perceived Stress ...............................80

viii
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Introduction to the Problem

The culture of public child welfare is arduous and demanding often presenting the

professionals with situations of exposure to secondary trauma. Some of the challenges

faced by those in public child welfare in addition to the strict guidelines mandated by

local and federal government are huge caseloads, inadequate compensation, long hours,

and inadequate resources for service to the children and their families (Lizano & Mor

Barak, 2015; McCrae, Scannapieco, Leake, Potter, & Menefee, 2014; Wu, Rusyidi,

Claiborne, & McCarthy, 2013; Yankeelov, Barbee, Sullivan, & Antle, 2009). In addition,

the setting of public child welfare encourages a sense of indistinctness concerning the

boundary that could create an imbalance between work and life for those who serve in the

position of middle managers and front line workers and middle management. The

boundary is vague because for the most part it is compulsory for these individuals to

respond to the needs of families at the time the need arises. This practice, often described

as being on-call, enabled further by advanced technology such as tablets and smart

phones, allows access to employees at any time, regardless of location and work hours.

For public child welfare middle managers, being on-call requires they respond to the need

of their direct reports (front line staff) as well as their superiors (Weaver, Chang, Clark,

& Rhee, 2007).

1
According to Živan, Neđo, and Pere (2009), increase demands in the realm of

work create increase imbalance for employees between the realm of work and personal

life. Society views work/life balance as the way an employee stabilizes their personal

life, the demands of family, as well as the demands of work and the capacity to balance

the employees’ work and personal lives for the well-being of the workforce (Nam,

2014;Wu et al., 2013). Therefore, work/life imbalance exists when employees perceive

conflict between their workforce demands and the demands of family and personal lives.

Work/life imbalance is a factor that causes stress, which in turn can lead to employee

burnout, which can lead to turnover (Auerbacha, McGowan, Ausbergerc, Strolin-

Goltzmana, & Schudricha, 2010; Lee, Forster, & Rehner, 2011; Payne, 2013). The

turnover rate for public child welfare professionals varies between 20 and 40% with the

average stay of employment ranging less than 24 months (Auerbacha et al., 2010; Ellett,

2009). Human services organizations need to grasp perceived imbalance between work

and non-paid work to retain and recruit front line caseworkers as well as middle

managers.

Westbrook, Ellett, and Asberg (2012) noted that when public child welfare

employee retention is increased, the quality of services provided to the families improve

with continuity, stability and efficiency. This is the ultimate goal of public child welfare

agencies, to serve and protect vulnerable children at risk of abuse and neglect.

Maintaining experienced managers within the agency will increase the probability of

provision of quality services to the children and families served through the system.

Research indicates that high staff turnover in public child welfare lead to unfavorable,

sometimes damaging effects on clients as well as staff (Madden, Scannapieco, & Painter,

2
2014). From a fiscal perspective, agencies will benefit from retaining experienced

managers in that the cost to fill a vacancy within public child welfare may range

anywhere from 33 to 70% of the annual salary for the position (Madden, Scannapieco, &

Painter, 2014). As the shift to the use of advance technology becomes more of the norm

for organizations, even human service organizations will need to find a way to maximize

productivity while preserving work/life balance, which is a key factor in recruitment and

retention.

Background of the Study

Retention of employees in human service professions, more specifically, public

child welfare, has been an continuing issue of concern for years. Working conditions for

public child welfare employees presents challenges such as caseloads that are

unmanageable due to the size, compensation that is often lower than others who are in the

field of helping professionals, frequent exposure to negative and traumatic situations and

issues of personal safety (Lee, Forster, & Rehner, 2011;Westbrook, Ellis, & Ellett, 2006).

Westbrook et al. (2006) further added that high rates of staff turnover exacerbate the

challenges for the employees who remain noting that job satisfaction is a factor that

influenced public child welfare workers to remain committed to employment. Job

satisfaction, burnout, turnover, and commitment are noted as residuals of work/life

conflict in addition to mental and physical issues (Lingard, Brown, Bradley, Bailey, &

Townsend, 2007). In a study, authors Westbrook, Ellett, and Asberg (2012) explained

that problems within the public child welfare professionals’ workforce destabilize the

value of the work and services provided to the families and children served. They noted

that the retention rate for public child welfare professionals is lower in southern states

3
than the national average (Westbrook et al., 2012). The outcome of low retention is

inexperienced staff being responsible for making major decisions regarding children’s

safety as it relates to abuse and/or neglect as well as a lack of continuity within cases

(Auerbacha et al., 2010; Westbrook et al, 2012; Westbrook et al, 2006).

Westbrook et al. (2006) suggest burnout for public child welfare workers as a

three dimensional conception that encompasses emotional fatigue, negative feelings

towards service recipients, and decreased sense of individual achievement. In examining

the issue of turnover for human service professionals in Louisiana, Payne (2013) noted

that burnout is a significant factor associated with high turnover rate for professionals

dedicated to provide service to others. It is further noted that burnout can not only be

harmful for the individual employee, but has the potential to be harmful for the

organization as well (Payne, 2013). In exploring the factors that influence public child

welfare workers to remain more committed than private child welfare workers,

Auerbacha et al. (2010) also noted job satisfaction and burnout as key factors that

contribute to turnover.

Burnout is related to stress for public child welfare workers. According to Lizano

and Mor Barak (2015) in response to stress, job burnout can lead to actions that may

decrease job satisfaction. The authors further noted that when an individual becomes too

overwhelmed with stress, they might become detached from work, to include clients and

colleagues (Lizano & Mor Barak, 2015). Lee et al. (2011) contend that stress is a

primary factor public child welfare professionals experience from various sources.

Research findings of studies examining burnout reflect public child welfare workers

4
report greater intensities of stress and burnout than their counterpart in the private arena

(Boyas & Wind, 2010; Kim, 2011; Kim & Ji, 2009).

Human service organizations may offer employees different resources to mitigate

some of the stress experienced in their day-to-day duties. In the case of public child

welfare workers, to enhance productivity, agencies provide tools in the form of

Information Communication Technology (ICT) such as smart phones, laptops, and

tablets. Research findings indicate the use of laptops during home visits to input

screening data yielded significant cost savings for the agency as well as time savings for

the workers (O'Connor, Laszewski, Hammel, & Durkin, 2011). For public child welfare,

ICT devices such as tablets and smart phones have become omnipresent permeating the

workforce because the devices offer such advanced capabilities and multiple functions

(Senarathne Tennakoon, da Silveira, & Taras, 2013). Advance technology has afforded

the workforce to become more flexible, mobile, and agile. However, it has also allowed

easier access to employees regardless of location and time, which has had a direct impact

on work/life balance. Fleck, Robison, and Cox (2014) investigated professionals in the

UK to ascertain how they used their devices to manage the boundaries between work and

non-work spheres of life. Their research noted that employees suffer from work/life

imbalance when they (the employee) do not establish a self-imposed boundary between

work and life (Fleck et al., 2014). Although, Fleck et al.’s (2014) research sample

included general full-time and part-time professionals in the UK, the results from the

research may be relevant to human service professionals in the research state.

Concerning ICT use and age, some researchers have considered the factor age has

on the influence of the use of devices such as smart phones, laptops, and tablets

5
(Kubiatko, 2013; Selwyn, 2009). Public child welfare agencies are comprised of multi-

generational professionals; Baby Boomers (individuals born between the years of 1946-

1964), the Generation Xers (individuals born between the years of 1965-1979), and the

Millennials (individuals born between the years of 1980 and 1994) (Buonocore, Russo, &

Ferrara, 2015). Some researchers predict that individuals who were born around 1980

and after have a greater propensity towards ICT familiarity and use (Beyers, 2009;

Newell, 2015).

Another factor researchers have examined with respect to the generations within

the workforce is how they respond to work/life balance. Individuals who are of age to be

classified as a Millennial are characterized as motivated workers; however, their

motivation for work/life balance outweighs their motivation for money and success

(Twenge, 2010; Parry & Urwin, 2011). Whereas Baby Boomers are reported to have a

higher motivation to live to work (Meriac, Woehr, & Banister, 2010;Yang & Guy, 2006).

The current research study examined the impact of age and work experience as

they relate to the impact of advanced technology (smart phone, laptop, and tablet) on

public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance.

Statement of the Problem

From Fouche and Martindale (2011) it is known that it is important for social

work practitioners to aim for optimal human functioning, subjective well-being, and

balance of work and life as a counter to stress, fatigue, and threat of burnout. Burnout

encompasses emotional fatigue, negative stances towards service recipients, and

decreased sense of individual achievement (Westbrook et al., 2006). Fouche and

Martindale (2011) further argue that to enable work/life balance for social work

6
practitioners, individuals should engage in conversations regarding the life domains that

define balance for each person. Research findings have shown that when organizations

fail to address the matter of stress for individuals, the organizations usually incur

significant costs related to the stress (Brooks, 2012).

Perrons (2003) researched the effect of technology on work/life balance in

relation to the Internet. This research noted the Internet had weighty effects for

organizations with respect to economic activity and increased productivity. Thus, for

organizations, technological advances resulted in positive returns. Conceivably,

technological advances will result in positive returns for human service organizations.

However, spending more time with work may result in higher cost for the organization as

a result of burnout in that an unfavorable effect of burnout is that it adversely impacts the

physiological and psychological well-being of employees (Lizano & Mor Barak, 2012).

Furthermore, with burnout, organizations also risk an increase in turnover, which in turn

will lead to an increase in cost through the expense to fill the vacancies (Payne, 2013;

Madden et al., 2014).

With advanced technology such as smart phones, tablets, and laptops, work can

flow into non-paid work time (life). Likewise, life (personal matters) can flow into paid

work time in that management of personal matters often occur through the same type of

technological tools that are provided for enhanced work productivity. Research findings

have shown that technological advances permit new opportunities for individuals to

manage the various roles in their lives with increased flexibility and mobility (Fleck,

Robison, & Cox, 2014). However, Fleck et al. (2014) further noted use of said

7
technology for work during times of non-paid work time has been negatively connected

to individuals’ health, happiness, and welfare.

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the effects of technology

advances upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance. More

specifically the study explicated on the relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT), age, work experience, and perceived stress for public child welfare

middle managers while expanding the theories of scientific management (Taylor, 1911),

stress process model (Pearlin, Menaghan, Lieberman, & Mullan, 1981), and generational

theory (Strauss & Howe, 1991).

Frederick Winslow Taylor developed the scientific management movement in the

early 1900s. The belief that the best way to increase output was to improve the

techniques, or methods used by workers served as the foundation for scientific

management (Taylor, 1911). Consequentially, others interpret Taylor as considering

people as instruments or machines manipulated by their leaders. Theorist of the scientific

management theory movement proposed that planned and developed organizations create

more efficiency in work methods in order to increase production (Caldari, 2007; Derksen,

2014). Management was to be separate from human affairs and emotions. The result

was the workers had to adjust to management, not management adjusts to the workers.

Taylor initiated time and motion studies to analyze work tasks to improve performance in

every aspect of the organization. Scientific management movement emphasized that

developing and enforcing performance criteria is a core function of the leader required to

8
meet organizational goals. Therefore, the needs of the organization is the focus of a

leader, not on the needs of the individual (Hershey, Blanchard, & Johnson, 2007).

Pearlin et al. (1981) developed the stress process model. This model proposed

that life events lead to negative changes in individuals’ roles (the sources of stress); those

changes causes deterioration of preferred features of self-concept (mediators of stress)

and that through this set of connections stress occurs (the manifestation of stress). The

authors further noted that coping and social supports might intervene at different points

throughout this process reconciling the outcomes (Pearlin et al., 1981).

The works of Pearlin et al. (1981) provided foundational support in the

development of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which is a generally utilized instrument

used for assessing an individual’s discernment of stress (Cohen, 2015). During recent

research, utilizing the PSS, Baghurst and Kelley (2014) noted stress comes in many

modes. Further, the authors noted stress is a process by which individuals respond to a

demand, or is a transaction between the environment or situation and the individual’s

resources to cope with the demands (Baghurst & Kelley, 2014). The stress process model

(Pearlin et al., 1981) addresses the stress public child welfare middle managers’

experiences because of the work/life imbalance.

William Strauss and Neil Howe (1991) work in the book Generations: The

history of America's future, 1584–2069, conceptualized the generational theory. In their

book, the authors provide a historical perspective of America from the viewpoint of the

tendencies and behavior shared by persons within a certain age at a specific point in time

that generate similarities (Strauss & Howe, 1991). The theory purports it is the history of

the culture and the society during the developmental period of the individual lives that

9
shapes generations (Li, X. Li, X. R. & Hudson, 2013). Generations have been defined as

a series of historical events and related cultural occurrences which impacts have created a

distinct group (Parry & Urwin, Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of

Theory and Evidence, 2011).

Significance of the Study

For years, researchers, professors, and leaders in the field of human services

have discussed, researched, and written about the history, purpose, and nature of the

social work profession. Ehrenreich (2014) notes that following World War 1, the

profession of Social Work emerged to react to the needs of those in poverty. Whereas

Reisch and Andrews (2014) notes that social work as a profession should engage in

both political and social matters that will assist the needy. Nevertheless, as the task of

the profession became more methodical and professionalized with the expectation of

expertise, many stressed that direct practice consisting of the practical assessment of

the problems of individual clients and families using material assistance should be the

focus (Callicutt & Lecca, 1983; NASW, 2016). Advanced technology enhances

practical assessment through timely access to resources.

Brady, Vodanovich, and Rotunda (2008) indicated that the use of advance

technology might be subsidizing the proliferation in work hours. Technology has created

overwhelming transformations to how individuals approach work, with “boundaryless

organizations, virtual workspaces, and the potential for constant wireless connection to

one’s work” (Kreiner, Hollensbe, & Sheep, 2009, p. 704). What was not known prior to

this study was if technological aides such as smart phones, laptops, and tablets caused an

increase in work/life imbalance for human service professional managers.

10
This study was conducted to determine if advanced technology caused work/life

imbalance to exist for human service public child welfare middle managers as research

has already shown that for professionals such as academia, advanced technology is seen

as both positive and negative in relation to work/life balance (Currie & Eveline, 2011).

The empirical evidence gleaned from this research can champion the need for the

development of supports to create a balance between work and life as it relates to

increase use of advance technology. Such support can come in the form of policies and

procedures around the use of technology during non-paid work hours. According to

Zuppo (2011), organizations with established policies limiting employees’ use of

Information Communication Technology (ICT) during non-paid work hours demonstrate

a positive awareness of the need for a healthy balance between work and life.

Research Questions

Research Question 1

R1: Is there a relationship between Information Communication Technology

(ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers?

H1: There is a significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

H01: There is no significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

Research Question 2

11
R2: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers?

H2: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

H02: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

Research Question 3

R3: Is there a relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress for

public child welfare middle managers?

H3: There is a significant relationship between work/life balance and perceived

stress for public child welfare middle managers.

H03: There is not a significant relationship between work/life balance and

perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers.

Research Question 4

R4: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers?

H4: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

12
H04: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

Definition of Terms

In explaining the concepts used in this research study, a mutual dialectal is

necessary. Therefore, terminologies are defined to provide clarification.

AWS. Alternative Workplace Solution is the term the public child welfare in the

Southern state from which participants were recruited uses pursuant to the State

Department of Human Resources Policy for Telework. The definition for telework as

stated on the organization’s website is a flexible workplace program that affords

employees the option to work at a place different from their official assigned job station

such as their home or a satellite location.

Burnout. As per the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Human Services

Professionals, this is a syndrome of emotional tiredness, depersonalization, and decreased

individual achievement at work (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1997).

Child Abuse. In general, child abuse means hurt, impended hurt, or harm to the

health or welfare of a child through purposeful physical injury, sexual misuse or

attempted sexual misuse, or sexual mistreatment and/or manipulation or attempted sexual

mistreatment and/or manipulation. Specific to the Southern state from which the

population is sampled, child abuse definition is when a youth under the age of 18 suffers

from, endured, or may be at risk of suffering from or enduring a disability, injury, wound,

or physical or mental condition as a result of neglect, brutality, or other actions or lack of

13
actions of a parent, caregiver, guardian, or relative (US Department of Health and Human

Services, 2016).

Child Maltreatment. Child Maltreatment is a significant issue encompassing

abuse and neglect that can have an ongoing detrimental impact (Crosson-Tower, 2010).

ICT. Information Communication Technology is the group of technologies such

as the Internet, e-mail, and portable communication devices (i.e., smart phones and

tablets) (Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011).

Work/life balance. Attempt at bringing equilibrium to time spent with personal

needs such as family, friends, and spirituality verses the demands of work (Živan, Neđo,

& Pere, 2009).

Public Child Welfare. Government mandated and funded agency established to

provide welfare services for children and their families. Services can range from child

protective services, such as investigations of abuse and neglect to adoption (Downs,

Moore, & McFadden, 2009).

Middle manager. An upper level Case Manager, as stated on the organization’s

website is also known as a front line supervisor. The person in this position is

responsible for the supervision of staff providing case management services. This

position is considered middle management in that there is a level of management

subordinate to them and several levels of management senior to their position.

Research Design

A quantitative non-experimental methodology utilizing a correlation and

descriptive-survey design formed the basis of this investigation. Creswell (2009)

expounded quantitative research design is applied to ascertain the relationship between

14
variables. Correlation is a statistical method used to establish whether a relationship

between variables occurs (Bluman, 2009). Quantitative research methods encompass the

assemblage and examination of numerical data, usually acquired from tests,

questionnaires, checklists, and other formal paper-and-pencil instruments (Treiman,

2009). Quantitative research uses a large enough population to provide statistically

significant data and utilize data analysis that relies on statistical procedures. This

research study established a relationship between the ICT and work/life balance. For the

purpose of this study, the variables measured are ICT, work/life balance, perceived stress,

employee’s age, and employee’s years of work experience.

Variables Alignment with Theory

Scientific management theory proposes that organizations will increase

productivity with improved techniques or methods used by workers (Taylor, 1911). The

independent variable, Information Communication Technology, postulates the same

advantages in that through the use of technology, the output of the work increases while

the barriers of inaccessibility to the workers decreases (Humphrey, 2009). Thus, with

scientific management theory, the focus is increased productivity and less on worker

satisfaction (Taylor, 1911). The dependent variables stress and work/life balance aligns

with the stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981) in that as work/life imbalance occurs

as a result of ICT use, factors that reflect an increase in stress and worker dissatisfaction

increase. Generational theory conceptualized by William Strauss and Neil Howe (1991)

purports that trends and sets of behaviors shared by persons within a certain age range at

a specific point in time generate similarities. The dependent variables age and work

experience aligns with the generational theory.

15
Assumptions and Limitations

Assumptions

Theoretical Assumptions. Scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911), stress

process model (Pearlin et al., 1981), and generational theory (Strauss & Howe, 1991) are

the key theoretical assumptions associated with this study’s framework. These theories

can best describe how ICT use has increased productivity while causing an increase of

blurring of lines for work/life balance with public child welfare middle managers and

thereby leading to increased levels of stress. Previous research has indicated that

scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911) promotes standardizations that produce

efficiency that leads to increased productivity (Taneja, Pryor, & Toombs, 2011). Day,

Paquet, Scott, and Hambley (2012) noted that ICT affords workers with opportunities to

access information at rates faster than ever, which is critical for public child welfare

middle managers. Therefore, scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911) supports ICT

use to increase public child welfare middle managers productivity.

Assumptions based on the scientific management theory suggest organizations

will promote ICT use to increase productivity regardless of the personal well-being for

employees (Nam, 2014; Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011). The stress process model

(Pearlin et al., 1981) suggests that ICT (smart phones, laptops, and tablets) use will be the

source of stress for publilc child welfare middle managers as it allows greater

opportunities to create work/life imbalance. This model further suggests that ICT use

may result in increased levels of stress as the third phase of the model suggests, the

manifestions of the source of stress (Day et al., 2012).

16
The generational theory (Strauss & Howe, 1991) suggests that individuals of a

particular age at a particular point in time, share similarities such as attitudes and

experiences. Cogin (2012) noted that today’s workforce contains at a minimum Baby

Boomers, Gen Xers, and Millennials, all with different work expectations and motivators.

Parry and Urwin (2011) contend that generational differences within an organization

influence all aspects of the workforce. Assumptions based upon this theory suggest that

age and work experience will explain the more of the variance of work/life balance over

and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands as well as more of

the variance in perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child

welfare middle managers.

The key theoretical assumptions associated with this study’s framework, scientific

management theory (Taylor, 1911), stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981), and

generational theory (Strauss & Howe, 1991) support the examination of the effects of

technology advances upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance.

More specifically the three theoretical assumptions provide the framework to examine the

relationship between Information Communication Technology (ICT), age, work

experience, and perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers.

Topical assumptions. The research philosophy aims to show there is a

relationship between advance ICT and the blurring of work/life balance boundaries for

public child welfare middle managers. Ontologically, the question for this research topic

becomes what is the reality of how much advanced technology influences balance for

work and life for public child welfare middle managers. It is important to have the

collective responses from managers to make an inference for all public child welfare

17
managers. This inference will be useful as public child welfare agencies across the

nation wrestle with retention due to worker burnout (Živan et al., 2009). Therefore, if

ICT presented with the intent of decreasing workload causes an increase in work/life

imbalance, agency leadership will need to be cognizant of how this affects their

workforce. Examining the relationship between ICT and work/life balance will garner

prevalent understanding of ways to mitigate the spillover of work into life as well as the

spillover of life into work in regards to the use of ICT. This is important for retention of

managers and in decreasing health issues related to imbalance between work and life.

The assumption the research topic attends to is that increased ICT (smart phones,

laptops, and tablets) use for public child welfare middle managers will cause work/life

imbalance to occur, which can lead to burnout and turnover (Day et al., 2012; Lizano &

Mor Barak, 2015; Payne, 2013; Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011).

Methodological Assumption. Research methods explore, learn, ascertain,

illuminate, and expound upon relationships among variables that will conclusively lead to

universally accepted laws that form the basis to forecast and regulate phenomena

(Ponterotto, 2005, 2010). Analyzing the correlation that ICT has on work/life balance

will lead to widespread comprehension of ways to mitigate the blurring of the boundaries

concerning the use of technological aides (smart phones, laptops, tablets). Furthermore,

an analysis of the correlation that age and work experience has on ICT use and work/life

balance will glean greater conception of the need to mitigate boundary blurring for the

realm of work and life for public child welfare middle managers. This is important for

retaining experienced managers and in reducing issues related to imbalance between

work and life. Research findings indicated that psychological and physical stress has

18
been cited as reasons for employee burnout, which leads to problems with retention for

public child welfare workers (Westbrook et al, 2012; Westbrook et al., 2006).

The methodological assumption represents the manner, processes, and techniques

of the research study (Ponterotto, 2005). The utilization of an online survey accessed

directly by participants eliminated any outside influence from researchers. The use of

online surveys presents researchers with the advantage of collecting data at a faster rate

and in most instances more economically (Cozby & Bates, 2012; Remler & Van Ryzin,

2011).

Epistemological. The relationship between the research participant and the

researcher is according to Ponterotto (2005, 2010) the foundation of epistemology. In

other words, epistemology considers the connection between the one who knows and the

one who will come to know. Individuals who know are the respondents or participants in

the research and the individuals who will come to know are researchers.

Post positivists promote an amended dualism/objectivism. A post positivist

concedes that researchers could possibly sway what is being researched; however,

impartiality, fairness, and neutrality along with researcher–subject independence remain

important guidelines for the research process (Ponterotto, 2005, 2010). In this instance,

the relationship between the research participant and researcher is that researcher was

until retirement (prior to the recruitment of participants and collection of data) in an

upper managerial role and has served in the past as a middle manager for two years with

public child welfare. The epistemological assumption is that researchers will maintain

objectivity and will adhere to the research process guidelines to ensure fidelity of the

study.

19
Ontological. The character of authenticity and existence makes up ontology

(Ponterotto, 2005, 2010). In other words, ontology attends to the question, “what is the

form and nature of reality and what can be known about that reality?” (Ponterotto, 2005,

p. 130). Post positivists consent that a true reality can only be collected and calculated

defectively. This thought is referred to as critical realism.

Critical realism is what post positivists consent as actual existence; however, they

deem it can only be depicted and assessed improperly (Ponterotto, 2005). Researchers

who subscribe to the post positivist position may approach topics through the use of

semi-structured, succinct discussions with clients after the cross-cultural phase and may

use numerous individuals to score in an attempt to identify a single proximal reality of

collective client experiences, or through the use of congruent agreement upon

acknowledged topics (Ponterotto, 2005). Ontologically, the question for this topic of

interest becomes what is the reality of how much technology influences balance for work

and life. It is important to have the collective responses from managers to make an

inference for all public child welfare managers. This inference will be useful as public

child welfare agencies across the nation wrestle with retention due to worker burnout

(Živan et al., 2009). Therefore, the ontological assumption is that tools such as smart

phones, laptops, and tablets are presented with the intent of decreasing workload increase

work spillover into family and personal time causing work/life imbalance; agency

executives will need to be cognizant of how this impacts their workforce (Adetayo,

Olaoye, & Awolaja, 2011).

Axiological. The moralities, philosophies and the standards embraced by the

researcher in the scientific process is what Ponterotto (2005) contends is axiology. In

20
other words, Ponterotto (2005) contends that the expectations, values, and feelings of

researchers have no position in scientific inquiry. To ensure such practices are mitigated,

it is recommended use of regimented, methodical exploratory in that this approach

affords researchers the opportunity to eliminate or austerely control any affect, and/or

encouragement she or he might have on the research process or on the participants

(Ponterotto, 2005, 2010).

The post-positivist researcher tries to contain their partialities, but comprehends

partialities are present and furthermore, may surface within the study in one form or

another. Researchers also acknowledge in the discussion summary or conclusion of the

study the manner in which biases may have affected the study (Ponterotto, 2005, 2010).

The axiological assumption for this research study is the fact researcher has served in a

managerial role with public child welfare for many years. While serving in this role,

there have been countless instances of work spillover into family and personal time as

well as family spillover into work. Nevertheless, in accordance with ethical standards,

the summary will contain a discussion of the biases.

Limitations

A limitation of this study was that the data was in the form of a self-report. The

accuracy and truthfulness of study participants present potential limitations to research

(Feeney & Bozeman, 2009). Another limitation was the sample population only consists

of public child welfare middle managers in the research state. Therefore, the findings

may not be generalized for all public child welfare agencies.

A third limitation of this study was the use of the web-based survey. According

to Remler and Van Ryzin (2011), web-based surveys present the challenge of possible

21
lower response rates due to participants’ lack of feeling compelled to comply with

request. In addition, web base surveys presents the challenge of technological issues

related to users’ computer systems, different web browsers, as well as the Internet

connections (Remler & Van Ryzin, 2011).

Organization of the Remainder of the Study

The current research study strived to expand the scientific management, stress

process model, and generational theory. Chapter 2 contains the review of literature. In

this chapter, the focus is on topics related to these theories and the research questions.

To aggrandize the literature on the scientific management, stress process model, and

generational theory as well as the relationship between ICT and work/life balance, this

research project is identified. Chapter 3 reviews the methodology used in this study.

This chapter encompasses the research design, data collection, and the statistical

approach used to analyze the data. The goal was to examine the overarching question

of the impact of advance technology on work/life balance for public child welfare

middle managers. Chapter 4 presents the findings of study supported by tables and

charts. Chapter 5 synthesizes the study and poses recommendations for the

development of supports to create a balance between work and life as it relates to

increase use of advance technology.

22
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of technology advances

upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance. Furthermore, the study

assessed how age and work experience factored into public child welfare middle

managers’ work/life balance as it relates to technology use. This literature review

represents the theoretical framework of scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911),

the stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981), generational theory (Strauss & Howe,

1991), as well as research pertaining to Information Communication Technology,

work/life balance, public child welfare, and generations within the workforce. The

aforementioned topics represent the theoretical foundation for the research as well as the

independent and dependent variables, respectively.

Public child welfare agencies instituted based upon local and federal government

statutes define the obligations, duties, and liabilities for providing well-being services

for children and their families (United States Department of Health and Human

Services, 2012; Weaver, Chang, Clark, & Rhee, 2007). Public child welfare agents

respond to the needs of children at risk of abuse, neglect, and/or maltreatment while

preserving families (Pecora, Whittaker, Maluccio, & Barth, 2012; United States

Department of Health and Human Services, 2012). For the public child welfare worker,

responding to the need of a child at risk would involve investigating physical, sexual,

23
and/or emotional abuse when the agency learns of the abuse regardless of the time of

day or night. Most child welfare agencies do not operate on twenty-four hour shifts;

however, they do require certain employees and managers to be on-call to handle

emergencies during non-office hours.

National statistics reflect that the rate of responses to investigations of

maltreatment have increased over seven percent within a five year period of time between

2010 and 2014 (Administration for Children and Families, 2016). Public child welfare

practitioners responded to victims of neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and child

deaths. According to the Child Maltreatment 2014 Report published by the

Administration for Children and Families (2016), in 2014, public child welfare agencies

received an approximate three million referrals involving around six million children.

With the increasing need for services to families, public child welfare agencies are in

search of ways to help practitioners become more efficient in completing tasks while

maintaining the integrity of the overarching goal, to provide for the welfare of the

children and families in need. In addition, public child welfare agencies must increase

efficiency while mitigating work situations that factor into work/life imbalance.

Methods of Searching

The search strategy for conducting this research included the following electronic

databases: Academic Search Premier, Capella Dissertations, EBSCOhost, ERIC, Google

Scholar, ProQuest, ProQuest Dissertation & Thesis Global, PsycINFO, SAGE Journals

Online, and SocINDEX with Full Text. The search terms included work/life balance,

technology, Information Communication Technology, ICT use, perceived stress, scientific

management, public child welfare, burnout, stress in the keyword search fields. A

24
combination of the keywords in the search fields reduced the results yielding available

usable literature.

Theoretical Orientation for the Study

This section encompasses a discussion of the theoretical orientation of the effects

of technology advances upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance is

discussed. The study structure builds on scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911)

and the stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981) as it relates to the variables of

Information Communication Technology (ICT) as the basis to enhance work productivity

for public child welfare middle managers and work/life balance. The foundation of the

scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911) is for the organization to have maximum

efficiency of work (Heorhiadi, Conbere, & Hazelbaker, 2014). Scientific Management

Movement give emphasis that one key function of the manager is to establish and

implement performance measures to meet organizational goals. The basis for the stress

process theory (Pearlin et al., 1981) is that individuals’ experience events in their life that

will cause stress which result in deterioration of their self-concept and possible

manifestations of stress such as health concerns (Frishman, 2012).

Scientific Management Theory

Frederick Winslow Taylor, originally from a family of means in Philadelphia

opted for employment as a “working class” instead of attending Harvard and studying

engineering. As an “average” employee, Taylor moved through the ranks to management

at Midvale Steel (Derksen, 2014). This experience served as the catalyst later known as

the scientific management theory. While in management, Taylor recognizing the issues

plaguing business regarding labor such as poor productivity and working conditions.

25
Taylor presented his solution to the problem to the American Society of Mechanical

Engineers in an essay presented as a “solution to the problem” (Derksen, 2014).

However, several years later Taylor authored the book, Principles of Scientific

Management (1911) which, elaborated on the theory.

According to Wagner-Tsukamoto (2008), scientific management theory assesses

how to construct job functions for workers and managers. The goal of Taylor’s theory

was to use scientific principles to enhance management (Chung, 2013). Keeping in mind

the labor issues plaguing the industries during the period of the late 1800’s, essentially

the aim of the theory was to develop a resolve for increase productivity and reduction of

conflict in interfaces between managers and employees (Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2008).

Even though Taylor garnered positive following from his theory, scientific

management also received criticism. Caldari (2007) noted Dennis Robertson was very

critical reflecting that scientific management reduces workers to actions void of thought.

Taylor’s scientific management was noted as turning men into machines to increase

effeciency.

Given that Taylor developed the scientific management theory in the late 1800’s

with the focus of managing factory work, Jeacle and Parker (2013) noted that Taylor’s

drive for effeciency continues to be a major factor in the business world today, even with

government. Even though scientific management theory faced criticism, organizations

continue to strive towards performing tasks more efficiently. This study adds to the

scientific management theory through the exploration of the impact of technology usage

on performance goals during times identified as non-work hours for human service

professionals, more specially, public child welfare middle managers.

26
Stress Process Model

Using longitudinal data ranging over a period from 1972 until 1977, Pearlin et al.

(1981) examined how life actions, persistent life struggles, managing, how one sees them

self, and communal supports come together in forming a process of stress. The authors

noted that a lot of empirical evidence existed to show the connection of life actions and

persistent life struggles relationship to stress, however, the research did not show the link

between the three conceptual domains: the source, the mediator, and the manifestation of

stress (Pearlin et al., 1981).

Pearlin and his associates interviewed over 1000 adults between the ages of

eighteen and sixty-five years in the Chicago area during the five-year period. The

interviews occurred in two waves with a period of four years between each. The results

allowed the authors to conceptualize the stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981). The

first domain is the source of stress. They determined the sources of stress to be tracked to

the peripheries of societies or cultures of the individuals (Pearlin et al., 1981). Sources of

stress can be a life event. Please note not all life events are sources of stress. Change is

inevitable, thus, one should expect life events to occur. Nevertheless, life events lead to

stress by “adversely altering the meaning of persistent life strains” (Pearlin et al., 1981, p.

339). Life events may develop new instances or exaggerate existing issues thereby

resulting in stress. Source of stress can also be how one views oneself and how much one

feels he or she is in control of things that significantly influences their life (Pearlin et al.,

1981). The second domain is the mediator of stress. The actions, discernments, and

understandings that people manage to tackle the stress eliciting occurances tend to

mediate the effect of the stressor. Pearlin and his associates (1981) noted two types of

27
mediators of significance, social supports and coping. The third domain is the

manifestation of stress. The general definition of stress that is observed in the research is

a reaction of the system to circumstances, environments, and/or situations that, either

intentionally or unintentionally, are experienced as harmful (Pearlin et al., 1981). In

summary, the stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981) combines three major conceptual

domains: the source of stress, the mediators of stress, and the manifestations of stress.

Researchers have continued to examine the stress process model (Pearlin et al.,

1981) and build upon the work of Pearlin. Susan Folkman (1997) used Pearlin’s model

(Pearlin et al., 1981) as a foundation for her work in examining what many perceive as

one of life’s most stressful events, caring for a loved one who is dying. Folkman’s work

eventuated with the process model (Pearlin et al., 1981) to include a deeper

understanding for mediators or coping mechanisms individuals use during extreme

stressful events (Folkman, 1997).

Jane McLeod (2012) noted that although Perlin’s model continues to be

examined, sociologist have not given equal representation in analyses to the meaning of

stress. With her research, the limitation of the origin of social perspective for the

respondent’s meaning of the stressors were addressed (McLeod, 2012). The author noted

that social structural events effect how people experience potentially stressful life events

(McLeod, 2012). Furthermore, McLeod (2012) contends expanding Pearlin’s model to

integrate a more distinguished perception of each of its major domains: the social context,

stressors, resources, and outcomes.

With the stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981), researchers have concentrated

efforts on the first two domains, the sources of stress, and the mediators of stress. How

28
an individual defines, stress is a key factor in determining the source of stress for that

individual. Regardless of what causes an individual stress, as noted by Pearlin et al.

(1981) it will likely result in a deterioration of self-concept. The research will expand the

stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981), as work/life imbalance will influence the

perception of self-concept for the human service’s public child welfare manager.

Generational Theory

William Strauss and Neil Howe (1991) authored the book, Generations: The

history of America's future, 1584–2069, in which the history of America is presented

through the lens of a generational perspective. Strauss and Howe (1991) generational

theory postulates that each generation has its place to one of four types, and that these

types recur successively in a set pattern. The research will add to this theory as age and

work experience will influence work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers in relation to their use of Information Communication Technology.

29
Review of the Literature

Work/Life Balance

Definition. Parris, Vickers, and Wilkes (2008) remarked the discussion

concerning how individuals can be successful in their careers without forfeiting a

successful satisfactory personal life has been ongoing for years. Such discussions have

birthed terms researchers and sociologist have come familiar with as work-family

conflict, family-work conflict (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996), work/life balance (Živan et

al., 2009), and spillover (Adetayo et al., 2011; Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011). Work/life

balance has been defined as bringing equilibrium between non-work and work schedules

(Kumar & Chakraborty, 2013). Munn, Rocco, Bowman, and van Loo (2011) defined

work/life balance as the choice individuals make to give precedence to their employment,

individual, family, social and community obligations. Nam (2014) contends that

work/life balance is how one perceives the relationship between their private life and

work. Basically, researchers agree that work/life balance equates to how an individual

finds happiness with their state of work and personal time (Chimote & Srivastava, 2013;

Darcy, McCarthy, Hill, & Grady, 2012; Kumar & Chakraborty, 2013; Munn et al., 2011;

Nam, 2014). It is important to note that not all individuals will have to balance “life”

with family, children, or a spouse (Waumsley, Houston, & Marks, 2010). Each person

will have to determine what constitutes the point of equilibrium for them between time

dedicated to performing work tasks and time dedicated to family and leisure.

Relationship between Work/Life Balance and Employee Performance. The

research examining the relationship between work/life balance and employee

performance has yielded both positive and negative effects. Keeton, Fenner, Johnson,

30
and Hayward (2007) surveyed a population of physicians to ascertain their assessment of

work/life balance. Their research indicated that physicians grapple with balancing

matters of work with time for life while remaining very pleased with their career and

maintain control over their work schedules to mitigate burnout (Keeton et al., 2007).

Townsend, Lingard, Bradley, and Brown (2012) noted the idea of flexible work

schedules have been offered up to alleviate some of the barriers presented to achieving

work/life balance. Unfortunately, the adjustment to a flexible work schedule to achieve

some semblance of a balance between work and life is not easily achievable when the

work schedules typically do not lend itself to flexible working hours (Townsend et al.,

2012). Although Townsend et al. (2012) study’s population was the Australian

construction industry, the same issue exists for public child welfare middle managers.

Public child welfare requires that workers respond to the needs of the children and

families served at the time the need arises (United States Department of Health and

Human Services, 2012).

When employees have positive feelings about the ability to manage family and

work, organizations will see an increase in attendance and performance outcomes

(Chimote & Srivastava, 2013; Smith, B. 2005; Townsend et al., 2012). In the case of the

Australian construction workers who opted for a longer work week for fiscal reasons,

work outcomes increased as did customer relations (Townsend et al., 2012). Researchers

also suggests that work/life balance and support from managers aids workers in increased

performance outcomes (Smith, B. 2005; Yankeelov et al., 2009).

31
Relationship between Work/Life Balance and Employee Retention/Turnover.

The pursuit for work/life balance gives way to the thought that individuals are seeking a

happy medium between time devoted to work and time allotted to spend with family

and/or leisure. When work/life imbalance occurs, the scales generally tip towards more

time applied to work and less time for life. Cegarra-Leiva, Sánchez-Vidal, and Cegarra-

Navarro (2012) examination of the relationship between work/life balance and retention

with the population Spanish industries managers yielded work/life balance increases

retention. Chimote and Srivastava (2013) research on the benefits of work/life balance

from the perspectives of both employees and organizations in India revealed work/life

balance reduces employee turnover. Deery and Jago (2015) research on the relationship

between work/life balance and employee retention sampled a different population, the

hotel hospitality industry in the UK. Nevertheless, the findings of their study support

previous research indicating that work/life imbalance leads to high turnover rates.

Achieving a healthy work/life balance on one’s own may not be an easy feat and

it may not be easy for the manager alone to devise a plan for which an employee can

reach some facet of balance between work and life. Many organizations may have

recognized that employer sponsored arrangements and practices created and supported to

enrich the lives of the employees tend to aid in the maintenance of work/life balance. For

example, some organizations offer job sharing, alternative workplace solution,

telecommuting, and flexible schedules (Darcy et al., 2012). In order for the work/life

balance programs to be successful organizations should have human resource policies in

place to sustain their existence. Organizations should consider an approach that would

32
tailor work/life balance protocols to meet the need of the entire workforce and not just

working parents or younger generations (Darcy et al., 2012; Waumsley et al., 2010).

Munn (2013) acknowledged the importance of work/life balance connection to

human resource professionals approach to the topic in a model referenced as the work-

life system. The work-life system encompasses work/life balance of the employee, the

initiative offered by the employer to address the balance, and the policies enacted by the

government, i.e., the Family Leave Medical Act (Munn, 2013). With regard to the

establishment of policies for work/life balance, Munn (2013) resolved, human resource

professionals’ involvement with work/life balance policies becomes an asset to the

agency because it sends a positive message to the employee. Furthermore, organizations

can show concern for its employees by ensuring policies, practices, and protocols

established to enhance work/life balance are commonplace within the culture of the

organization (Cegarra-Leiva et al., 2012; Munn, 2013). Singh (2013) remarked that

organizations could entice employees by presenting employees with packages that

encompass work/life balance policies, thereby increasing potential recruitment and

retention.

Information Communication Technology (ICT)

Definition. Information Communication Technology (ICT) is a term given to

describe electrical or technical devices that are capable of collecting, transmitting, storing

information that allows vast access and connectivity at all times (Day et al., 2012; Nam,

2014; Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011; Senarathne Tennakoon, da Silveira, & Taras, 2013).

ICTs have become so engrained into individuals’ daily lives, one researcher refers to the

devices as moving from tools to assist with daily living to becoming the master of one’s

33
life (Falzon, 2012). ICT devices such as smart phones, laptops, and tablets allow

employees the freedom to work anywhere and flexibility to work any time (Currie &

Eveline, 2011; Humphrey, 2009).

ICT Uses at Work. Information communication technology (ICT) use has

afforded the workforce many options of staying connected and increased flexibility in

completing tasks. Organizations embraced advanced technology use as it has allowed

concepts such as telework and flexible work schedules. Flexiblity is a major asset for

organizations because it allows employees opportunities to adjust their schedules around

other tasks. The flexibility garnered from ICT use for organizations many times result in

work during non-work time (Fleck et al., 2014). Zuppo (2011) noted that organizations

are users of human capital through ICT use agreeing that flexible work schedules may aid

productivity but it comes at a cost of muddled delineation between work time and

personal time. Zuppo (2011) further noted that with ICT use, organizations provide

employees with devices needed to stay linked to the organization outside of a required

official workweek in the name of improved production.

Organizations use ICT to allow employees flexible work schedules and

telecommuting opportunities (Leung & Zhang, 2016). As a result of the flexible working

conditions afforded by ICT use, organizations have embraced telecommuting. ICT use

supports the skill set of multi-tasking in that it allows employees the capability to manage

multiple tasks while enhancing performance outcomes (Cardona, Kretschmer, & Strobel,

2013; Leung & Zhang, 2016).

Senarathne Tennakoon (2011) as other researchers have found that although ICT

use affords users flexibility, the down side is that it has the potential to lead to increase

34
work hours, decrease private hours, and increase stress. In addition, some employees are

resistant to accepting ICT use in that it changes the way they are accustomed to doing

their work (Humphrey, 2009).

ICT Use in Public Child Welfare Agencies. Postive relationships with peers,

feeling supported by supervisors, open flow of communication, and trust are factors that

have been reported as important in mitigating job burnout for public child welfare

workers; however, they are also factors noted as lacking as a result of infusing ICT use

with public child welfare (Smith & Eaton, 2014). Information and communication

technology (ICT) usage in public child welfare practice reflects prevailing interest of

managers rather than those of the workers (Tregeagle & Darcy, 2008). Smith and Eaton

(2014) stated that even though the intent was to increase outcomes, the merging of ICT

use and public child welfare was met with resistence because some felt the reliance on

ICT use decrease the human aspect of the human service profession. They further

reported that ICT was seen as a tool to measure performance, thus decreasing the gap

between subordinate and supervisor (Smith & Eaton, 2014). West and Heath (2011)

reported that concerning public child welfare, ICT use allows users to communicate more

quickly and efficiently. Smith and Eaton (2014) examined secondary data in a case study

research to evaluate the impact of the computer software, CWS/CMS, that was designed

for the employees to enter information on their cases. The authors found that for public

child welfare, integrating ICT is a process that requires honoring the uniqueness of the

organization (Smith & Eaton, 2014).

Information Communication Technology (ICT) and Work/Life Balance

35
Senarathne Tennakoon (2011) noted that ICT is now fundamental on a global

level as devices such as smart phones and tablets have merged into the day-to-day lives

of people. According to Senarathne Tennakoon (2011), little research was conducted

concerning the implications of ICT use on work/non-work interactions with managers.

Therefore, she researched the use of the ICT devices and their impact on work/life

balance of managers and professionals on a global level from the countries of Sri Lanka

and Canada. The study yielded ICT use is connected to work/non-work interfaces, which

impact work/life balance (Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011). Researchers also noted that

ICT impacted work/life balance for South-Western Nigerian private universities staff

(Adetayo et al., 2011). The authors explored the relationship of ICT’s use contribution to

the expansion of work during non-work hours and discovered that rather than increase the

stress of work on the respondents, ICT use meaningfully help sustain balance (Adetayo et

al., 2011). Furthermore, Adetayo et al. (2011) concluded that usage of ICT by private

university staff should rather be encouraged and expanded upon for the purpose of

work/life balance. In considering the female workforce of the Netherlands, the

researchers posed that the use of ICTs may enhance work/life balance by enabling the

women to improve their ability to multitask (Hubers, Schwanen, & Dijst, 2011).

Wajcman, Rose, Brown, and Bittman (2010) also examined the impact of ICT on work

life balance with the focus on Australian families’ use of the Internet impact on their

work/life balance. Based upon the results of their research, they determined the Internet

does not seem to interpose on the penetrability of work/life balance (Wajcman et al.,

2010). Recognizing the mounting research to support how ICT allows work to flow into

life and life to flow into work, Senarathne Tennakoon, et al. (2013) continued the

36
research to ascertain the precursors of ICT use in and amidst work and non-work domains

in the exploration of dissipating work/life boundaries. The authors reported that an

individuals’ discernment concerning ICT is a predictor of both ICT use for work and non-

work (Senarathne Tennakoon et al., 2013).

Nam (2014) used pre-existing data from the Pew Internet and American Life

Project’s Networked Workers Survey of 2008 to examine the impact of ICT of the

Internet and mobile technology on work/life balance. For the purpose of his research,

Nam (2014) explained work/life balance as two dimensional, flexibility and permeability.

The dimension of flexibility further explained as how easily an individual will allow

boundaries to inflate or decrease to accommodate role of work over life or life over work

(Nam, 2014). Permeability is more of the behavior associated with the boundary crossing

such as an individual who may be busy in the office stop to take a personal phone call

(Nam, 2014). Based upon his establishment of two dimensions, Nam (2014)

conceptualized work/life balance as four levels: Integration (high flexibility, high

permeability), Interference (low flexibility, high permeability), Autonomy (high

flexibility, low permeability), and Segmentation (low flexibility, low permeability). The

findings of the study revealed that the use of the Internet and mobile technologies indeed

influences work/life balance dimensions of permeability and flexibility (Nam, 2014). In

addition, Internet and mobile technologies were successful in determining work/life

balance types and they definitely lead to job stress (Nam, 2014). In other words, it was

determined that the use of ICT meaningfully effects work/life balance in terms of

flexibility and permeability as well as the consequences such as stress (Nam, 2014).

37
Age and Work/Life Balance. Research indicates that generational confrere

cultivates likenesses in their thoughts, feelings, and beliefs centered on common

experiences in life (Meriac, Woehr, & Banister, 2010). Buonocore et al. (2015) explored

if workers’ perceptions of work/life balance differed depending upon their generations.

Research suggests employees of different generations hold different perspectives of

work/life balance with implications that employees of the younger generations, unlike the

older generations, have different approaches to life in general and participate in diverse

behaviors in early stages of their careers (Li X. et al., 2013; Buonocore et al., 2015).

Buonocore et al. (2015) reported that work/life balance is important for Millenials,

eventhough their approach to obtaining a balance is different than Baby Boomers and

Generation Xers. In explaining the difference in the approaches to work/life balance for

the generations, Yang and Guy (2006) suggests that individuals of the Generation X seek

career rewards and tend to switch jobs more frequently than Baby Boomers. Meriac et al.

(2010) contend that most Baby Boomers established their approach to work and life

during a period of where success lead to immense affluence, whereas those of the

Generation X culture were exposed to a much different setting that may have cultivated

dissimilar outlooks concerning their work efforts. For this reason, Buonocore et al.

(2015) contend that organizations should invest in developing and implementing

work/life balance initiatives with benefits for a multi-generational workforce.

38
Experience and Work/Life Balance. Achieving a balance between work and

life for employees can result in organizations retaining experienced employees

(Yankeelov et al., 2009). Evans, Carney, and Wilkinson (2013) noted that men who

reported having increased levels of work/life balance also report satisfaction with their

careers and remain in their organizations. However, when work/life imbalance is

heightened, employees suffer emotionally which in turn effects work experience (Darcy

et al., 2012). Organizations with clear strategies to developing work/life balance policies

and protocal will benefit from maintaining experienced satisfied workers. Workers who

experience work/life imbalance will have higher rates of job turnover which in turn leads

to fragmented work experience. A public child welfare employee may change their job

between one and three years leading to a less experienced workforce (Auerbach et al.,

2010).

Critique of Previous Research Methods

The review of the literature for work/life balance and ICT use yielded a plethora

of studies conducted in various fields from different countries including but not limited to

Asia, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, and America. Using the

statistical approach of multiple regression, Adetayo et al. (2011) and Hubers et al. (2011)

using ANOVA, conducted quantitative research utilizing surveys to collect data which

yielded results contrary to the trends in ICT use. The results of their research indicate

that ICT use is more of a benefit than a hindrance. It is important to note that the results

of their studies supported each other even though conducted in countries on two different

continents (Africa and Europe) with very distinct cultures.

39
Senarathne Tennakoon (2011) used a mixed method approach, some structured

in-depth interviews and a large scale web based survery, to ascertain the impact of ICT

use on work/life balance for professionals in Canada and Sri Lanka. It was noted that the

population of the two countries was comparably different in that one country, Sri Lanka,

was considered to be less developed than the other, Canada (Senarathne Tennakoon,

2011). The author’s approach to collect data allowed for higher reliability than a single

method. The findings of her study indicate that ICT use negatively impacts work/life

boundaries (Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011).

One consistent theme noted for the reviewed quantitative research studies is the

limitation factor of surveys provide data in the form of a self-report. The challenge with

self-report is that the data may be over or under reported (Feeney & Bozeman, 2009).

However, the use of surveys for the collection of data for quantitative research has

benefits as it allows access to a larger population (Cozby & Bates, 2012; Remler & Van

Ryzin, 2011). For this quantitative study to examine the effect of advance technology of

public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance, the use of a survey best served

as the method to collect data.

Summary

This literature review represents the theoretical framework of scientific

management theory (Taylor, 1911), the stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981), and

the generational theory (Strauss & Howe, 1991), as well as research pertaining to

Information Communication Technology, work/life balance, and public child welfare

middle managers. The foundation of the scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911) is

for the organization to have maximum efficiency of work (Heorhiadi, Conbere, &

40
Hazelbaker, 2014). Scientific Management Movement (Taylor, 1911) emphasized that a

key function of the manager was to establish and implement performance measures to

meet organizational goals. The basis for the stress process theory is that individuals’

experiences events in their life that will cause stress which result in deterioration of their

self-concept and possible manifestations of stress such as health concerns (Frishman,

2012). The foundation of the generational theory (Strauss & Howe, 1991) rests on a

historical perspective of America through the lens of behaviors and actions that allows

them to group people into one of four types, and said types repeat sequentially in a fixed

pattern. The concept of research on information communication technology is not new,

nor is its relationship to work/life balance. In addition, the review of the literature

reflects a plethora of research in the area of work/life balance. However, there remains

limited research on the impact of technology on work/life balance for human service

professionals. This chapter has identified research studies that examined work/life

balance, ICT use, scientific management theory, stress process model, and generational

theory. The proceeding chapters will present the methodology, research findings, and

discussion for the study.

41
CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of technology advances upon

public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance. In addition, the study measured

how age and work experience influence public child welfare middle managers’ work/life

balance as it relates to technology use.

Work/life balance is not a novel concept for social science research. Researchers

have noted that struggles and stresses between the demands of home and work have an

overwhelming effect on employees and increase their risk of health problems (Abendroth,

2011). The use of technology in the workplace also is not a new concept, yet ever

changing. In examining manager’s attitudes towards the use of mobile technology in the

office, Wood (2012) noted assessments relating to the use of technology in the workplace

evidenced back to the 1960’s with mainframe computer technology. However, with the

advent of technological work aides, such as the personal laptop computer, personal digital

assistant (PDA), cell phones, and electronic messaging, one would expect a decrease in

work demands, thus creating a greater work/life balance. Zuppo (2011) contends that

with advanced technology, people serve as capital for organizations. In his research,

Zuppo (2011) used the term Information Communication Technology (ICT) to define the

technology used by organizations to maintain mobile connection with employees.

42
In examining the relationship of technology and the workplace, Senarathne

Tennakoon (2011) likened the relationship to enslavement in that study participants

yielded imbalance of work/life because of disproportionate work related technology use

during non-paid work hours. Although researchers have begun to study the impact of

technology on work/life balance, there remains limited research on the impact of

technology on work/life balance for human service professionals.

This chapter focuses on addressing the methodology in the study by examining

the effects of technology advances upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life

balance. This chapter will also provide information regarding the target population,

sample size, data collection, data analysis, and procedures employed in conducting this

research.

Research Questions and Hypotheses

There were four research questions and four related hypotheses framed for

investigation. They are as follows.

R1: Is there a relationship between Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands and the work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers?

H1: There is a significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and the work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

H01: There is no significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and the work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

43
R2: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in work/life

balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands for

public child welfare middle managers?

H2: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

H02: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

R3: Is there a relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress for public child

welfare middle managers?

H3: There is a significant relationship between work/life balance and perceived

stress for public child welfare middle managers.

H03: There is not a significant relationship between work/life balance and

perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers.

R4: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in perceived

stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers?

H4: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

H04: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

44
Research Design

The research design for this study was a quantitative non-experimental

methodology utilizing a correlation and descriptive-survey design. Quantitative research

uses a population that is substantial in size, which will provide data that is statistically

meaningful and relies on statistical procedures. The statistical test required was

hierarchical multiple regression. Multiple regression is an advanced correlational

technique.

Alpha Level

The alpha level is the level at which the null hypothesis will be rejected assuming

that the null hypothesis is true. In social sciences, the alpha level is p < .05 (Brace,

Kemp, & Snelgar, 2009).

Target Population and Sample

Population

The research state’s public child welfare agency is a public child welfare

organization that investigates allegations of child maltreatment such as abuse and neglect.

In addition, as stated on the organization’s website, the agency provides services to help

families reach and maintain a sense of permanency as well as resolve issues that may

threaten the safety or well-being of children. The website further noted the agency

strives to offer quality practice and case management to ensure the safety of children in

their homes. The public child welfare organization in the southern region of the United

States provided the sample extraction.

Most current data reports as stated on the organizations website, the body of

employees for the Southern state public child welfare agency from which the population

45
was sampled total more than 4000 serving in roles of health-care workers, teachers,

attorneys, accountants, researchers, quality-control experts, information technology

specialists, case managers, and a broad range of various other positions. Within the

agency’s case manager series are four levels: Case Managers 1 through 4. Case Manager

1 (less than 12 months of experience) and 2 (more than 12 months of experience) perform

the front line tasks associated with the services to the children and families served. The

position of Case Manager 3 presents the first line of supervision/management.

Individuals who serve in this role may have limited field responsibilities and they report

directly to individuals who serve in the position of Case Manager 4. Individuals who

serve in the role of Case Manager 4 are responsible for the supervision/management of

employees who are in the role of Case Manager 1, 2, and/or 3. According to the

organization’s fiscal year 2014-2015 quarter four report, the total number of Case

Manager 4 employed by public child welfare agency in the Southern state from which the

population is sampled is 378.

Sample

Public child welfare middle managers (Case Manager 4) from a Southern state

comprised the sample for the research. Eligible criteria for this sample encompassed

individuals who supervise front line staff and individuals serving in the role of the first

line of supervision (Case Manager 1 – 3). In addition, the managers must have more than

one year experience in the role as supervisor in public child welfare. Of the 378

supervisors/managers, 108 responses were received, 5 were rejected, leaving 103 used for

all statistical analysis for this study.

46
Power Analysis

A power analysis was conducted using G*Power 3.1 (Faul, Erfelder, Lang, &

Buchner, 2007). G*Power uses an analysis-by-design approach for computing the

required sample size based on certain input parameters. For hierarchical multiple

regression, five input parameters are required. The first parameter is effect size. Effect

size is a way of quantifying the magnitude of the relationship between variables. Effect

sizes are classified as small, medium or large (Cohen, J. 1969). A medium effect size (f2

= .15) will be used for the proposed study.

The second parameter is the alpha level. As aforementioned, the alpha level for

the study was p < .05. The third required parameter is the power level. The power level

refers to the degree of confidence one can have in the results. In social sciences the

minimum acceptable power level is .80 (Brace, Kemp, & Snelgar, 2009). For this study,

a power level of .95 was sought.

The fourth required parameter is the number of tested predictors. This refers to

the number of steps used in the hierarchical regression models. There will be two steps

for each regression model. The fifth required input parameter is the total number of

predictors. There are three predictors for each regression model. Based on the preceding

parameters, a sample size of 107 was recommended. Figure 1 provides an illustration of

how power increases with increasing sample size.

47
Figure 1. Sample Size Calculation for Proposed Analyses

Procedures

1. Approval was garnered from the Institutional Review Board of the attending

university. In order to gain approval from the research site, the appropriate form

was completed and submitted to research state’s Research and Grant Review

Committee (RGRC). The RGRC serves as the Institutional Review Board of the

public child welfare agency to ascertain the capability of approval of the research

proposal based on several requirements, which include but are not limited to

adherence to state laws, ethical standards and there are no risks to involved

participants.

2. A formal request was submitted in writing to the research state’s Human Resources

Executive Director for permission to administer the survey to participants. An

48
explanation of the administration of the survey with the utilization of the web-

based software, SurveyMonkey© was presented to the agency’s Human Resources

Executive Director. Furthermore, for the survey, there was no direct access to

respondents or any manner to identify individual respondents.

3. Following approvals of all IRB, a meeting with the agency’s Services Human

Resources Executive Director, who has no authority over the potential participants,

occurred to discuss the email dissemination plan to include the survey release date.

4. During this meeting, the agency’s Human Resources Executive Director was

presented with copies of the cover letter for the study that explained the purpose of

the study, the Adult Informed Consent Form, the recruitment email, and the IRB

approval letters.

5. Given the initial date of release for the survey was set around an official state holiday,

the agency’s Human Resources Executive Director recommended sending reminders

in two-week intervals.

6. The estimated time presented to take the survey was approximately 45 minutes

(Cohen, Kamarck, & Memelstein, 1983; Day et al., 2012; Netemeyer & Boles, 1996).

The participants had 90 days to complete the survey. Intermittent participation

reminders were sent via e-mail to help augment the rate of return (Bluman, 2009).

7. Directions to complete the research instrument were communicated utilizing a

confidential link to the web-based survey that was integrated in the participation

invitation e-mail. The participant had to fulfill the requirements of the informed

consent section/form prior to advancing to the section with the questions pertaining to

the inclusion standards.

49
8. The web-based program, SurveyMonkey© prohibited participants to proceed in the

survey if the participant did not meet the criteria on the demographic page. After

completion of a demographic section, participants were instructed to proceed to the

next sections of the survey.

9. Participants were able to respond to the web-based survey only when the applicable

criteria (e.g., informed consent and years of service as a manager) were met for

inclusion. The web-based software has features that allow text analysis and the

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software amalgamation, in that

data was examined utilizing SPSS (SurveyMonkey©, 2013; Trochim, 2006).

10. Responses obtained during data collection are maintained via password protection on

a personal computer file with back-up copies kept in a password protected flash drive

to ensure confidentiality.

11. Disclosure of the identity of participants will not be included in any reports of the

research.

Participant Selection

The non-probability sampling design of purposive sampling best served this

research in that selected subjects are preferred for a distinctive purpose (Remler & Van

Ryzin, 2011). The strategy for the sample was a computer generated self-administered

survey. The use of computer generated self-administered survey allowed the respondents

the flexibility of completing the survey at a time most convenient for them. A request

was submitted in writing to the agency’s Human Resources Executive Director, for

permission to administer the web-based survey electronically to participants. It was

requested from the Human Resources Executive Director to disseminate the email

50
invitation to participants to include a cover letter for the study that explained the purpose

of the study, the confidential nature of the survey, the Adult Informed Consent form, and

the instructions for completing the survey.

Protection of Participants

Each participant was required to acknowledge he or she read and understood the

Adult Informed Consent form, which was included in the email invitation from the

Human Resources Executive Director. A Uniform Resource Locator (URL) was

provided in the Adult Informed Consent form that enabled participants to connect to the

link where the questionnaire was hosted. There was no direct access to respondents and

no process to identify individual respondents in that the submission of the questionnaire

utilized the web-based software SurveyMonkey©. The expectation was for the survey

responses to be confidential and voluntary and the respondents have the option to

suspend involvement with the web-based survey at any point. No individual participants

were identified and research findings will be reported only as aggregate data.

Participants will not be contacted following the study.

Data Collection

Data collection for the quantitative study consisted of collecting data obtained

from the web-based tool SurveyMonkey©. Data collection occurred from January 15,

2016 to March 21, 2016. Participants were asked to complete the survey during non-

work hours. User identity was concealed; however, to ensure an individual participant

did not compete the survey multiple times, SurveyMonkey© would not allow a

participant to complete the survey more than one time. Based on the parameters of the

power analysis, a total of 107 respondents were recommended. There were a total of 108

51
responses to the survey. However, only 103 responses were eligible for consideration for

data use. Data was exported directly from SurveyMonkey© to SPSS 23 for Windows to

be analyzed.

Data Analysis

The research questions and hypotheses were answered and tested with

hierarchical multiple regression. Hierarchical multiple regression best fit the research

study in that it allows selection for the order in which the variables are entered as they

test assumptions concerning the influence of several forecast variables in a successive

way (Petrocelli, 2003; Wampold & Freund, 1987).

R1, R2, H1 and H2 were answered with one hierarchical multiple regression model.

In Step 1 of the model, Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands serve as

the independent variable. The dependent variable is work/life balance. This answered

R1, H1. In Step 2 of the model, age and work experience served as independent variables.

Step 2 of the model answered R2, H2. A significant F-change from Step 1 to Step 2

means that at least one or both variables significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands.

Similarly, R3, R4, H3 and H4 were answered with one hierarchical multiple

regression model. In Step 1 of the model, work/life balance serves as the independent

variable. Perceived stress serves as the dependent variable. This answered R3, H3. In

Step 2 of the model, age and work experience serves as independent variables. This

answered R4, H4. A significant F-change from Step 1 to Step 2 means that at least one or

52
both variables significantly explain more of the variance in perceived stress over and

beyond work/life balance.

The variables produced ordinal data. Ordinal variables can be organized in some

measurement such as quantity, point system, or value (Bluman, 2009; Treiman, 2009).

For example, responses to a survey question of somewhat likely, likely, not likely, would

produce ordinal data by assigning a code of the number 1 to somewhat likely, the number

two (2) to likely, and the number three (3) to not likely (Bluman, 2009; Treiman, 2009).

Table 1 provides a summary of the research questions, statistical tests,

independent/dependent variables, and scales of measurement.

53
Table 1 Research Questions, Independent/Dependent Variables

Research Question Independent Dependent


Variable/Scale of Variable/Scale of
Measurement Measurement
R1: Is there a relationship between Information Work/Life
Information Communication Technology Communication Balance/ Interval
(ICT) demands and the work/life balance Technology (ICT)
for public child welfare middle managers? demands/Interval

R2: Do Age and work experience Age/Work Experience/ Work/Life


significantly explain more of the variance Interval Balance/ Interval
in work/life balance over and beyond
Information Communication Technology
(ICT) demands for public child welfare
middle managers?

R3: Is there a relationship between Work/life Perceived


work/life balance and perceived stress for balance/Interval Stress/Interval
public child welfare middle managers?

R4: Do Age and work experience Age/Work Experience/ Perceived


significantly explain more of the variance Interval Stress/Interval
in perceived stress over and beyond
work/life balance for public child welfare
middle managers?

Instruments

The research instrument was comprised of the purpose of study statement,

informed consent form, instructions, and researcher and mentor contact information.

Participants were required to review this information before gaining access to the actual

survey (Creswell, 2009). The electronic survey was generated using web-based software,

SurveyMonkey©. The research utilized a survey as the instrument for data collection.

The construction of the survey combined the ICT Demands Scale (Day et al., 2012) and

54
the Work-Family Conflict/Family-Work Conflict Scale (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996) with

the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983).

ICT Demands Scale

Validity. Recognizing an increase use of ICT in the workforce with limited

empirical data on the impact of ICT concerning employees’ well-being, Day et al. (2012)

developed the ICT Demands Scale. The purpose of the scale was to measure both ICT

demands as well as supports. ICT demands are identified as annoyances such as device

malfunction, limited information about how to use the device, and how the device may be

used to monitor the employee; whereas support is having qualified IT personnel available

to provide timely assistance to employees to buffer the demands need (Day et al., 2012).

The ICT Demands Scale was developed and validated in 2012 using Exploratory

Structural Equation Modeling. The scale encompasses 27 questions assessing eight

theorized areas pertaining to ICT demands: response expectations; 24/7 availability;

ineffective communication; lack of control over ICT; hassles using ICT; employee

monitoring; ICT learning expectations; and workload. Participants respond to the

questions using a five point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always) (Day

et al., 2012).

Reliability. Day et al. (2012) computed scores from the 8 scales noted above to

examine their reliability. They reported Cronbach’s alphas for the eight subscales ranged

from .70 to .79, with item-total correlations ranging between r .41 and r .68 (Day et al.,

2012).

Work-Family Conflict/Family-Work Conflict Scales

55
Validity. Netemeyer and Boles (1996) determined that research concerning work

and family conflict was one-dimensional in that it measured work-family conflict (WFC).

They reported that it was important to consider both family-work conflict (FWC) as well

as work-family conflict because family and work are the significant pivotal aspects of

maturity (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996). Netemeyer and Boles (1996) noted that there was

great variance in the existing measures between work-family conflict and family-work

conflict; they therefore developed a tool to assess commonly agreed upon aspects of

WFC as well as FWC. In general, WFC/FWC is defined as the level to which role

obligations from the work and family spheres conflict (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996). For

the purpose of the development of the scale, WFC was defined as a form inter-role

struggle in which the general requirements of time dedicated to, and tension created by

the job impede with implementing family related duties (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996). In

addition, Netemeyer and Boles (1996) for the purpose of the development of the scale,

defined FWC as a form of inter-role conflict in which the general requirements of time

dedicated to, and tension created by the family impeded with implementing work-related

duties. Netemeyer and Boles (1996) developed a five-item scale of WFC and FWC to

provide a consistent measure of these domains. Construct reliability, coefficient alpha,

and average variance extracted estimates provided evidence of internal consistency and

validity (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996). Furthermore, they reported that construct reliability

is a LISREL-generated estimate of internal consistency analogous to coefficient alpha

(Netemeyer & Boles, 1996).

Reliability. To determine reliability, Netemeyer and Boles (1996) examined

various studies that used some type of numerous-item measures of WFC and FWC as

56
discrete constructs and assessed the average correlations reported to the data they

collected. Netemeyer and Boles (1996) used t tests to examine the correlation between

WFC and FWC and measures dealing with variables other than WFC and FWC. The

results of the comparison between their data and the other studies yielded their WFC and

FWC measures consistently presented stronger correlations with job satisfaction,

organizational commitment, job tension, and life satisfaction than did the corresponding

measures of WFC and FWC adding validity to their scales (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996, p.

408).

Perceived Stress Scale

Validity. Cohen et al. (1983) argued that there were limits to both the objective

and subjective measures of stress that were used in the measurement of inclusive and

specific stress levels. Therefore, they presented an article to discuss said limitations. The

article presented a “psychometrically sound global measure of perceived stress” with the

intent of adding to the literature concerning the link between stress and illnesses (Cohen

et al., 1983 p. 385). As mentioned previously, the authors noted limitations to objective

and subjective measures of stress, however, they did point out advantages of objective

measures. For example, measurements are typically simple and the methods reduce the

likelihood of different subjective prejudices in the opinions and conveying of events

(Cohen et al., 1983). The authors aimed to provide a more suitable forecaster of

outcomes than the measurement of objective and subjective stressors such as life event

scales through the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen et al., 1983). Cohen et al. (1983)

noted that perceived stress is a measureable outcome of the felt intensity of stress as a

57
result of tangible stressful events, processes for managing, temperament, character,

nature, etc.

The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) was used to measure the degree to

which an event in an individual’s life is discerned stressful. The scale encompasses

inquiries about the participant’s current levels of lived through stress and the degree to

which situations are identified as stressful. The scale validated in 1983 is utilized in

numerous scientific research articles in the human services venue. Since it’s validation,

the scale is now available in over 13 different language translations. Dr. Sheldon Cohen

web site for the Study of Stress, Immunity, and Disease (2015) hosts downloadable forms

of the scale as well as a statement of permission to use for research. The site also host

abstracts of research articles relevant to the use of the scale.

The tool has ten questions that are universally applicable to any sub-population.

The responses are measured using a five point Likert scale measurement of occurances

from “never” to “very often”. Therefore, the tool will generate quantitative ordinal data.

Reliability. The PSS sample encompassed males and females with a mean score

of 23, 18, 23.67 from the student population, and 25.0 from the stop-smoking sample

(Cohen et al., 1983). The authors reported the standard deviations were “7.31, 7.79, and

8.00, and ranges were 6 to 50, 5 to 44, and 7 to 47” (Cohen et al., 1983, p. 390). The

coefficient alpha reliability for the PSS was .84, .85, and .86 in college student sample 1,

college student sample 2, and stop-smoking sample (Cohen et al., 1983).

Reliability Analysis for Research Survey

The reliability of the instrument for the sample of managers was tested with

Cronbach’s alpha. The reliability of the subscales initially ranged from .31 for perceived

58
stress to .85 for ICT demands and work/life balance. The minimum acceptable reliability

is .70. By visual inspection of the items measuring perceived stress, survey items #52,

53, 55, and 56 appeared to be reverse-coded. Therefore, an inter-item analysis was

conducted on the data, which confirmed that the items were reverse-coded. After

reverse-scoring the items for perceived stress, α = .89. Thus, the reliability was

acceptable for all the variables of interest. Reliability Coefficients for research are

presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Reliability Coefficients

Variable N of Cronbach’s
Items alpha
Information Communication Technology (ICT) 27 .851
Demands
Work/Life Balance 10 .85
Perceived Stress 10 .89

Operationalization of Variables

The ICT Demands Scale (Day et al., 2012) measured Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands. To compute the score, an average of the responses to the 27

items on the instrument was obtained. Once a score was computed, the data was on an

interval scale of measurement.

The Work-Family Conflict Scale and the Family-Work Conflict scale (Netemeyer

and Boles, 1996) measured work/life balance. A score was computed by reverse coding

the items and averaging the responses so that the higher the score, the greater work/life

balance. Once a score was computed, the data was on an interval scale of measurement.

59
Age was a derivative variable computed by subtracting the year of birth for each

participant from the year the participants completed the survey. Work experience was a

demographic variable in the data set and was on an interval scale of measurement.

The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) measured perceived stress. A score was

computed by averaging the responses. Once a score was computed, the data was on an

interval scale of measurement.

Ethical Considerations

Prior to beginning the study, approval was granted from the Institutional Review

Boards associated with both Capella University and the site in which the data was

collected. Any probable risk or discomfort was stated in writing and participants were

requested to acknowledge this potential risk to their emotional and psychological welfare

and their comprehension of their rights as participants by signing the appropriate form.

Participants gave consent via electronic signatures.

As noted in the Belmont Report (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,

1979), respect, beneficence, and justice will remain paramount in the process of informed

consent with the study to examine the effects of ICT on work/life balance for public child

welfare middle managers.

Vulnerable research populations are categorized by age, ill health, minority status

or some other disempowered position in society that can be open to exploitation (Sieber

& Tolich, 2012). Children, elderly people, incarcerated people, pregnant women, and

mentally challenged people are typically categorized as vulnerable. However, vulnerable

adults can also include such people as victims of domestic violence, homeless

60
people, drug addicted, prostitutes, as well as those who may be vulnerable due to their

sexual orientation (Sieber & Tolich, 2012).

The population for this research was middle managers in public child welfare. In

general, the population is not vulnerable. Nevertheless, there are some risks for the study

participants as life into work was measured. Employees who acknowledge instances of

life (family, issues) flowing into work time, risk possible retribution from the employer.

To protect participants from this risk, the researcher must ensure confidentiality of all raw

data. In so doing, researcher ensured exclusion of legal ramifications regarding

confidentiality to minimize risk of employee retribution regarding family spillover into

work issues.

Validity, reliability, credibility, and researcher’s position are four areas that can

challenge research. By adhering to professional ethics, reliability and validity issues of

concern decrease for researchers (Cozby & Bates, 2012). Researcher can engage in a

process of reflecting critically on the self as researcher to address personal bias (Merriam,

2009). Researchers must be very transparent concerning their personal bias, perspective,

and assumptions (Remler & Van Ryzin, 2011). In addition, researchers should be candid

and disclose their personal feelings if there is relevance in their feelings regarding the

matter of the study (Remler & Van Ryzin, 2011). Concerning transparency and personal

bias, researcher’s experience within public child welfare did not challenge the validity of

the research as all professional and ethical standards were adhered. Professional

standards such as IRB approval were garnered and there was no direct contact between

researcher and participants.

61
Summary

With this qualitative non-experimental, correlational design research, a

correlational relationship was projected between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers. It was expected that the demographic factor of age would glean a better

understanding of the correlational relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers. Kubiatko (2013) noted that age is a crucial factor that affects how one

responds to ICT. Kubiatko (2013) further explained that the individuals identified as

Millennial (age 18-34) attitudes towards work and ICT were more positive than the

Generation Xers (age 35-46). It was also projected there would be a correlational

relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress for public child welfare

middle managers. The culture of public child welfare cultivates boundaryless

environment. To examine the relationship, a sample size consisted of 103 public child

welfare middle managers. The nature of the work of public child welfare, being

responsible for the safety and well-being of children, is stressful in and of itself.

However, not being able to distinguish clear lines between work and life can lead to

increased levels of stress. Finally, the expectations of this study were to ascertain the

effects of technology advances upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life

balance. This chapter addressed the methodology of the study, provided information

about the target population, sample size, data collection, data analysis, and procedures.

The remaining chapters will provide the results of the data followed by a discussion.

62
CHAPTER 4. RESULTS

Background
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of technology advances upon

public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance. Moreover, the study assessed

how age and work experience factored into public child welfare middle managers’

work/life balance as it relates to technology use. Research has shown technological

advances as contributing factors that led to increased work hours (Brady et al., 2008).

Furthermore, with technology and the potential for constant wireless connection comes a

significant change in the manner in which people approach work such as with

boundaryless organizations and virtual workspaces (Kreiner et al., 2009). What is not

known is if technological aides have caused an increase in work/life imbalance for human

service professional managers.

It is imperative for those in the profession of social work and other human service

professions to aim for optimal human functioning, subjective well-being, and balance of

work and life as a counter to stress, fatigue, and threat of burnout (Fouche and

Martindale, 2011). Burnout encompasses emotional fatigue, negative stances towards

service recipients, and decreased sense of individual achievement (Westbrook et al.,

2006). Leiter, Bakker, and Maslach (2014) remarked that high demands, insufficient

resources, coupled with work becoming more portable are linked to contemporary

burnout. Conversations are needed concerning the life domains that define balance for

individuals in order for human service professionals to obtain work/life balance (Fouche

63
& Martindale, 2011). Brooks (2012) noted that when the employer does not address the

issue of employees’ stress, the employer might incur substantial financial burdens as a

result of the employees’ stress.

A survey was utilized as the instrument for data collection. The survey was

constructed by combining the ICT Demands Scale (Day et al., 2012) and the Work-

Family Conflict/Family-Work Conflict Scale (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996) with the

Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983). The ICT Demands Scale encompasses 27

questions assessing eight theorized areas pertaining to ICT demands: response

expectations; 24/7 availability; ineffective communication; lack of control over ICT;

hassles using ICT; employee monitoring; ICT learning expectations; and workload.

Participants respond to the questions using a five point Likert scale ranging from 0

(never) to 4 (almost always) (Day et al., 2012).

Netemeyer and Boles (1996), developed a tool, which consisted of the Work-

Family Conflict Scale to assess commonly agreed upon aspects of work-family conflict

(WFC) and the Family-Work Conflict Scale to assess family-work conflict (FWC). The

scale encompasses 10 questions and was used in the current study to measure work/life

balance. Participants respond to the questions using a seven point Likert scale ranging

from strongly disagree to strongly agree (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996).

The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983) was used to measure perception

of stress. The scale encompasses inquiries about the participant’s current levels of stress

and the degree to which situations are identified as stressful. The tool has ten questions

that are universally applicable to any sub-population. The responses are measured using

a five point Likert scale measurement of occurances from never to very often.

64
Data collection occurred through SurveyMonkey©, a web-based data collection

tool. Upon approvals of all IRB, a written request was submitted to the research state’s

Human Resources Executive Director, who has no authority over the potential

participants asking that to share the survey. The population for the research was public

child welfare middle managers. Eligible criteria for this population encompass

individuals who supervise front line staff. The organization’s website define the role of

supervisors to fit the criteria of eligible participants. Eligible participants are accountable

for the management of employees who provide case management services for children

under the research site’s supervision, in the custody of the research site, or at risk of the

research site’s custody and their families.

Organization of this chapter encompasses an introduction, discussion of the

sample demographics, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics and data screening,

research questions/hypothesis testing, and conclusions. Data were exported directly from

SurveyMonkey© to SPSS for analysis. Data collection occurred from January 15, 2016

to March 21, 2016. Data were analyzed with SPSS 23 for Windows. The following

provides a discussion of the sample demographics.

Description of the Sample

The sample consisted of 103 managers; 89.3% (n = 92) were females and 10.7%

(n = 11) were males. About half (52.4%, n = 54) were Gen-Xers, 11.7% (n = 12) were

Millennials; 34.9% (n = 36) were Baby Boomers; and 1% (n = 1) was 66 years of age or

older. The generation of the managers is presented in Table 3.

65
Table 3 Manager Generation

Generation n % Cumulative %
Millennial (age 18 - 34) 12 11.7 11.7
Generation X (age 35 - 46) 54 52.4 64.1
Younger Baby Boomer (age 47 - 56) 26 25.2 89.3
Older Baby Boomer (age 57 - 65) 10 9.7 99.0
Other (age 66 and over) 1 1.0 100.0
Total 103 100.0

Regarding educational attainment, 57.3% (n = 59) had bachelor’s degrees; 40.8%

(n = 42) had master’s degrees; and 1.9% (n = 2) had PhDs. Approximately half (47.6%,

n = 49) of the respondents had 5-19 years of overall work experience and the remaining

52.4% (n = 54) had 20 or more years of overall work experience. See Table 4.

Table 4 Years of Overall Work Experience

Years of Experience n % Cumulative %


5-9 5 4.9 4.9
10 - 14 16 15.5 20.4
15 - 19 28 27.2 47.6
20 - 24 17 16.5 64.1
25 - 29 20 19.4 83.5
30 and over 17 16.5 100.0
Total 103 100.0

66
Nearly a fourth (23.3%, n = 24) of the managers worked on their current jobs 0-4

years; 22.3% (n = 23) worked 5-9 years; and the remaining 54.4% (n = 56) had been

working on their current jobs for more than nine years. Years working in current job are

included in Table 5.

Table 5 Years Working in Current Job

Years in Current Job n % Cumulative %


0-4 24 23.3 23.3
5-9 23 22.3 45.6
10 - 14 28 27.2 72.8
15 - 19 15 14.6 87.4
20 - 24 8 7.8 95.1
25 - 29 4 3.9 99.0
30 and over 1 1.0 100.0
Total 103 100.0

The largest category of the managers (38.8%, n = 40) had 0-4 years of supervisor

experience in public child welfare; 27.2% (n = 28) worked 5-9 years; and the remaining

34% (n = 35) had been working in public child welfare for more than nine years. Years

of supervisory experience in public child welfare are presented in Table 6.

67
Table 6 Years of Supervisory Experience in Public Child Welfare

Years of Experience n % Cumulative %


0-4 40 38.8 38.8
5-9 28 27.2 66.0
10 - 14 13 12.6 78.6
15 - 19 13 12.6 91.3
20 - 24 6 5.8 97.1
25 - 29 2 1.9 99.0
30 and over 1 1.0 100.0
Total 103 100.0

The majority of managers (65%, n = 67) were married; 9.7% (n = 10) had

partners; 1% (n = 1) were widowed; and 14.6% (n = 15) were divorced or separated. Ten

respondents (9.7%) did not provide information regarding their family statuses.

Regarding the number of children, 44.7% (n = 46) of managers had one child, 33% (n =

34) had two children, 12.6% (n = 13) had three children, 2.9% (n = 3) had four children,

1% (n = 1) had five or more children, and 90.3% (n = 93) had no children. Thus, 9.7% (n

= 10) of the managers had children (n = 97). Thirty-six (37.1%) children were adults.

Fifty children (51.5%) were ages 5-18. Eleven children (11.3%) were younger than five

years of age. The number of children and their ages are presented in Table 7.

Table 7 Number of Children and Their Ages

1 Child 2 Children 3 Children 4 Children 5 or More None

< 5 Years 8 3 0 0 0 34

Ages 5-18 25 18 5 2 0 27

Adult 13 13 8 1 1 32

68
On the average, managers engaged in work-related activities 2-55 hours per week

(M = 39.25, SD = 9.83) at the workplace with a median of 40 hours and a mode of 37.5

hours. On the average, managers engaged in work-related activities 0-48 hours per week

(M = 7.19, SD = 6.65) at home with a median and a mode of 5 hours per week. See Table

8.

Table 8 Number of Hours Engaged in Work-Related Activities

Number of Work-related Activities per Number of Work-related Activities


Week at the Workplace per Week at Home
N Valid 103 100
Missing 0 3
Mean 39.25 7.19
Median 40.00 5.00
Mode 37.50 5.00
SD 9.83 6.65
Minimum 2.00 0
Maximum 55.00 48.00

Descriptive Statistics and Data Screening

For ICT demands, scores can range from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). For the

sample of managers, scores ranged from 0.93 to 3.19 (M = 2.15, SD = 0.43). A higher

score indicated greater ICT demands. A mean of 2.15 for this variable indicates that on

the average, managers almost never had ICT demands. For work/life balance,

participants responded to the questions using a seven point Likert scale ranging from 0

(strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). For the sample, scores ranged from 0.90 to 6 (M

= 3.44, SD = 0.98). A higher score reflected greater work/life balance. A mean of 3.44

indicates that overall, managers were undecided about work/life balance. For perceived

69
stress, scores can range from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). A higher score indicates greater

perceived stress. For the sample of managers, scores ranged from 0.1 to 3.10 (M = 1.69,

SD = 0.63). A mean of 1.69 indicates that managers sometimes (1.69 can be rounded to 2

which indicates sometimes) perceived stress. Descriptive statistics are presented in Table

9.

Table 9 Descriptive Statistics

Variable N Minimum Maximum M SD


Information Communication Technology (ICT) 103 .93 3.19 2.15 0.43
Demands
Work/Life Balance 103 .90 6.00 3.45 0.98
Perceived Stress 103 .10 3.10 1.69 0.63

The data were screened for normality with skewness and kurtosis statistics and

also with histograms. In SPSS, distributions are considered to be normal when the

absolute values of the skewness and kurtosis coefficients are less than two times their

standard errors. Skewness and kurtosis coefficients indicated that the distributions were

within normal range for all three variables. See Table 10.

Table 10 Skewness and Kurtosis Coefficients

N Skewness Kurtosis
Variable Statistic Statistic SE Statistic SE
Information Communication Technology 103 -.038 .238 .241 .472
(ICT) Demands
Work/Life Balance 103 .062 .238 .160 .472
Perceived Stress 103 -.134 .238 .014 .472

70
For ICT demands, skewness = -.038 (SE = 0.24) and kurtosis = .241 (SE = 0.47).

The normal histogram for ICT demands is presented in Figure 2. A normal curve was

superimposed in the figure to underscore the symmetrical shape of the distribution.

Figure 2. Histogram for Information Communication Technology Demands

For work/life balance, skewness = .062 (SE = 0.24) and kurtosis = .16 (SE =

0.47). The normal histogram for work/life balance is presented in Figure 3.

71
Figure 3. Histogram Work/Life Balance

For perceived stress, skewness = -.134 (SE = 0.24) and kurtosis = .01 (SE = 0.47).

While the statistics indicated that the distribution was normal for perceived stress, the

histogram suggested that the distribution was multimodal. A multimodal distribution can

indicate differences in subpopulations and in this instance may indicate differences in

perceived stress among subpopulations. The histogram for perceived stress is presented

in Figure 4.

72
Figure 4. Histogram for Perceived Stress

Hypothesis Testing

There were four research questions and four related hypotheses formulated for

investigation. They are as follows.

R1: Is there a relationship between Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers?

H1: There is a significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

H01: There is no significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

73
R2: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in work/life

balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands for

public child welfare middle managers?

H2: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

H02: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

R3: Is there a relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress for public child

welfare middle managers?

H3: There is a significant relationship between work/life balance and perceived

stress for public child welfare middle managers.

H03: There is not a significant relationship between work/life balance and

perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers.

R4: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in perceived

stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers?

H4: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

H04: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

74
The research questions and hypotheses were answered and tested with

hierarchical multiple regression. R1, R2, H1 and H2 were answered with one hierarchical

multiple regression model. In Step 1 of the model, Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demand was entered as the independent variable. The dependent

variable was work/life balance. This answered R1, H1. In Step 2 of the model, age and

work experience were entered as independent variables. Step 2 answered R2, H2. A

significant F-change from Step 1 to Step 2 will mean that at least one or both variables

significantly explain more of the variance in work/life balance over and beyond

Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands. Similarly, R3, R4, H3 and H4

were answered with one hierarchical multiple regression model. In Step 1 of the model,

work/life balance was entered as the independent variable. The dependent variable was

perceived stress. This answered R3, H3. In Step 2 of the model, age and work experience

were entered as independent variables. This answered R4, H4. A significant F-change

from Step 1 to Step 2 will mean that at least one or both variables significantly explain

more of the variance in perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance.

Research Questions 1 and 2/Hypotheses 1 and 2

Prior to conducting the multiple regression, the assumptions of multiple

regression were tested. The residuals were analyzed. A residual is the difference

between the observed values and the model-predicted values of the dependent variable.

Standardized residuals were considered to be statistical outliers if they exceeded ± 3.

Residuals ranged from -2.86 to 2.93 and were therefore considered to be within normal

limits. A normal probability plot was generated to illustrate the normality of the

75
standardized residuals. Normality is demonstrated by the closeness of the points to the

straight line as illustrated in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Normal Probability Plot of Residuals for Work/Life Balance

A scatterplot of standardized residuals and standardized predicted values was

generated. If the points form a rectangle across the middle of the figure, then it can be

assumed that the data meets the assumptions about normality, linearity, and

homoscedasticity of residuals. See Figure 6.

76
Figure 6. Scatterplot of Standardized Residuals for Work/Life Balance

ICT demands explained 16% of the variance in work/life balance and was

statistically significant, F(1, 101) = 19.34, p < .001. The negative regression coefficient

means that the relationship between ICT demands and work/life balance was negative (β

= -0.40, t = -4.40). As ICT demands increased by one standard deviation, work/life

balance decreased by 0.40 standard deviations. In Step 2 of the model, age and overall

work experience were entered. However, there was no significant F-change from Step 1

to Step 2, F(2, 99) = 0.14, p = .869. This means that age and work experience did not

significantly explain more of the variance in work/life balance beyond ICT demands.

Regression coefficients are presented in Table 11.

77
Table 11 Regression Coefficients for Work/Life Balance

Variable B SE B β t p
1 (Constant) 5.39 0.45 11.96 .000
Information Communication Technology (ICT) - 0.21 - -4.40 .000
Demands*** 0.90 0.40
R2 .161***
F for change in R2 19.37***
2 (Constant) 5.56 0.56 10.01 .000
Information Communication Technology (ICT) - 0.21 - -4.38 .000
Demands*** 0.91 0.40
Age - 0.16 - -0.17 .862
0.03 0.02
Work experience - 0.09 - -0.20 .840
0.02 0.03
2
R .163
2
F for change in R .141
Note. Dependent variable = Work/Life Balance. ***p < .001

H01 stated that there is no significant relationship between Information

Communication Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child

welfare middle managers. There was a significant, negative relationship between

Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public

child welfare middle managers, (β = -.40, t = -4.40, p < .001). Therefore, the null

hypothesis was rejected.

H02 stated that age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the

variance in work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology

(ICT) demands for public child welfare middle managers. There was no significant F-

change from Step 1 to Step 2, F(2, 99) = 0.14, p = .869. Therefore, the null hypothesis

78
was not rejected. This means that age and work experience did not significantly explain

more of the variance in work/life balance beyond ICT demands.

Research Questions 3 and 4/Hypotheses 3 and 4

Residuals ranged from -2.86 to 2.14 and were therefore considered to be within

normal limits. A normal probability plot was generated to illustrate the normality of the

standardized residuals. The closeness of the points to the straight line supports the

normality of the distribution. See Figure 7.

Figure 7. Normal Probability Plot of Residuals for Perceived Stress

79
A scatterplot of standardized residuals and standardized predicted values was

generated. The points formed a general rectangle across the middle of the figure.

Therefore, it can be assumed that the data meets the assumptions about normality,

linearity, and homoscedasticity of residuals. See Figure 8.

Figure 8. Scatterplot of Standardized Residuals for Perceived Stress

Work/life balance explained 25% of the variance in perceived stress and was

statistically significant, F(1, 101) = 34.03, p < .001. The negative regression coefficient

means that the relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress was negative

(β = -0.50, t = -5.83). Work/life balance increased by one standard deviation, perceived

stress decreased by 0.50 standard deviation. In Step 1 of the model, age and overall work

experience were entered. However, there was no significant F-change from Step 1 to

80
Step 2, F(2, 99) = 0.52, p = .596. This means that age and work experience did not

significantly explain more of the variance in perceived stress beyond work/life balance.

Regression coefficients are presented in Table 12.

Table 12 Regression Coefficients for Perceived Stress

Variable B SE B β t p
1 (Constant) 2.81 0.20 14.07 .000
Work/Life Balance -0.32 0.06 -0.50 -5.83 .000
2
R .245***
2
F for change in R 34.03***
2 (Constant) 2.87 0.27 10.50 .000
Work/Life Balance -0.33 0.06 -0.50 -5.83 .000
Age 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.91 .367
Work experience -0.06 0.06 -0.13 -0.99 .325
2
R .26
2
F for change in R 0.52
Note. Dependent variable = Perceived Stress. ***p < .001

H03 stated that there is not a significant relationship between work/life balance

and perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers. There was a significant,

negative relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress for public child

welfare middle managers, (β = -.50, t = -5.83, p < .001). Therefore, the null hypothesis

was rejected.

H04 stated that age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the

variance in perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare

middle managers. There was no significant F-change from Step 1 to Step 2, F(2, 99) =

0.52, p = .596. Therefore, the null hypothesis was not rejected. This means that age and

work experience did not significantly explain more of the variance in perceived stress

81
beyond work/life balance. Table 13 provides a summary of all alternative hypotheses

tested and the outcomes.

Table 13 Summary of All Hypotheses Tested

Hypothesis Significance Outcome

H1: There is a significant relationship between Information p < .001 Supported


Communication Technology (ICT) demands and work/life
balance for public child welfare middle managers.

H2: Age and work experience significantly explain more of p = .869 Not
the variance in work/life balance over and beyond Supported
Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands for
public child welfare middle managers.

H3: There is a significant relationship between work/life p < .001 Supported


balance and perceived stress for public child welfare middle
managers.

H4: Age and work experience significantly explain more of p = .596 Not
the variance in perceived stress over and beyond work/life Supported
balance for public child welfare middle managers.

Summary

Four research questions and related hypotheses were formulated for investigation.

There was a significant, negative relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and the work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers. As ICT demands increased, there was a corresponding decrease in work/life

82
balance. Age and work experience did not significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance beyond ICT demands. There was a significant, negative relationship

between work/life balance and perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers.

As work/life balance increased, there was a corresponding decrease in perceived stress.

Age and work experience did not significantly explain more of the variance in perceived

stress beyond work/life balance.

83
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION, IMPLICATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS

Introduction

This study investigated the effects of technology advances upon public child

welfare middle managers’ work/life balance. More specifically, the study illuminated on

the relationship between Information Communication Technology (ICT), age, work

experience, and perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers while

expanding the theories of scientific management (Taylor, 1911), stress process model

(Pearlin et al., 1981), and generational theory (Strauss & Howe, 1991). The environment

of public child welfare promotes a culture where the boundary between work and life is

not easily discerned for front line workers and middle management in that the individuals

who serve in these positions are required to respond to the needs of families served at the

time the need arises. Technological aids such as smart phones and tablets exasperate this

custom further by allowing access to employees at any time, regardless of location and

work hours. Research findings indicate that technological advances permit new

opportunities for individuals to manage the various roles in their lives with increased

flexibility and mobility (Fleck et al., 2014). Nevertheless, Fleck et al. (2014) further

noted use of said technology for work during times of non-paid work time has been

negatively connected to individuals’ health, happiness, and welfare. Up until this point,

no studies have examined the impact of advance technology on work/life balance for

public child welfare middle managers. Therefore, this study addressed this gap in the

84
literature by assessing the impact of ICT use on work/life balance for public child welfare

middle managers.

Summary of the Results

A quantitative correlational approach was used to understand the impact of

advance technology on public child welfare middle manager’s work/life balance. This

study used hierarchical multiple regression to assess the relationship between ICT and

work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers in a Southern state from

which the population was sampled. The scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911),

stress process model (Pearlin et al., 1981), and the generational theory (Strauss & Howe,

1991) served as the theoretical foundation to the study.

This research utilized a survey as the instrument for data collection. The survey

was constructed by combining the ICT Demands Scale (Day et al., 2012) and the Work-

Family Conflict/Family-Work Conflict Scale (Netemeyer & Boles, 1996) with the

Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983). Data was collected through

SurveyMonkey© from 108 respondents of which 103 were eligible for use.

The results revealed that ICT demands explained 16% of the variance in work/life

balance for middle managers. In other words, as ICT demands increased, work/life

balance decreased. The results support the findings of previous research such as Leung et

al. (2016) examination of telecommuting and ICT use. Leung et al. (2016) research

revealed that ICT use and telecommuting negatively impacts work/life balance.

In Step 2 of the model, age and overall work experience yielded no significant F-

change from Step 1 to Step 2; indicating that age and work experience did not

significantly explain more of the variance in work/life balance beyond ICT demands.

85
The results of Step 2 do not align with current research. Kubiatko, Halakova, Nagy, and

Nagyova (2015) examination of attitudes towards ICT use between different age groups

suggests that age significantly impacts not only use, but attitudes towards the use of ICT.

The results further reflected that work/life balance explained 25% of the variance in

perceived stress for middle managers. There again, there was no significant F-change

from Step 1 to Step 2; meaning that age and work experience did not significantly explain

more of the variance in perceived stress beyond work/life balance. The subsequent

research questions and hypotheses directed this study:

Research Question 1

R1: Is there a relationship between Information Communication Technology

(ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers?

H1: There is a significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

H01: There is no significant relationship between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

Research Question 2

R2: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers?

86
H2: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

H02: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers.

Research Question 3

R3: Is there a relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress for

public child welfare middle managers?

H3: There is a significant relationship between work/life balance and perceived

stress for public child welfare middle managers.

H03: There is not a significant relationship between work/life balance and

perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers.

Research Question 4

R4: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers?

H4: Age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

H04: Age and work experience do not significantly explain more of the variance

in perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers.

87
The research questions and hypotheses were answered and tested with

hierarchical multiple regression.

Discussion of the Results

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of advance technology on

public child welfare middle manager’s work/life balance. The analysis of the data

demonstrated that there is a significant relationship between ICT use and work/life

imbalance for public child welfare middle managers in a Southern state from which the

population was sampled; age and work experience did not account for the variance in

work/life balance beyond the ICT demands. Furthermore, the data also yielded there is a

significant relationship between work/life balance and stress; however, age and work

experience does not account for the variance in perceived stress beyond work/life

balance.

The findings of this research study afford public child welfare organizations to

grasp the concept that imbalance between work and non-paid work time (life) for middle

managers may lead to stress and ICT use can further exasperate said imbalance. The

research study aimed to respond to the following questions:

Research Question 1

R1: Is there a relationship between Information Communication Technology

(ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers?

The data reflects that there is a relationship between ICT demands and work/life

balance for public child welfare middle manager. Conceivably, devices provided to

public child welfare middle managers with the aim of increasing worker proficiency and

88
agency outcomes are directly related to work/life imbalance. The results of this research

support previous research, which indicates ICT use has the potential to lead to increase

work hours, decrease private hours, and increase stress (Nam, 2014; Senarathne

Tennakoon, 2011).

Research Question 2

R2: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT)

demands for public child welfare middle managers?

The data reflects that age and work experience do not significantly explain more

of the variance in work/life balance over and beyond Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands for public child welfare middle managers. Although research

indicates there is a difference in how the generations approach ICT use (Kubiatko, 2013;

Kubiatko et al., 2015; Zickuhr, 2011), public child welfare middle managers appear to

show little differences. The data from this study may not support the findings from

previous literature concerning age, ICT use, and work/life balance in that the public child

welfare middle managers are required to be proficient in the use of ICTs.

Research Question 3

R3: Is there a relationship between work/life balance and perceived stress for

public child welfare middle managers?

The result of the data reveal there is a significant relationship between work/life

balance and perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers. Apparently,

public child welfare middle managers perceive their lives as having elevated levels of

stress resulting from work/life imbalance. Moreover, the culture of public child welfare

89
in and of itself promotes a stressful environment in that workers are repeatedly exposed

to respond to situations of child abuse and maltreatment. This conclusion supports

previous research found in the literature that notes a significant relationship between job

stress and public child welfare workers (Boyas & Wind, 2010; Boyas, Wind, & Ruiz,

2013; Salloum, Kondrat, Johnco, & Olson, 2015).

Research Question 4

R4: Do age and work experience significantly explain more of the variance in

perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers?

The data reflects that age and work experience do not significantly explain more

of the variance in perceived stress over and beyond work/life balance for public child

welfare middle managers. Evidently, stress has no respect of persons. However, the

findings do not support the literature. Twenge (2010) contends that individuals identified

with the group Millennial are self-absorbed and would be more of the cause of stress in

the workplace.

Conclusions Based on the Results

The results of this hierarchical multiple regression analysis and SPSS analytics

were able to reveal measures of significance between Information Communication

Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child welfare middle

managers. While two of the four hypotheses were supported, the findings present strong

implications that public child welfare agencies should focus on creating policies and

protocols to enhance work/life balance while embracing ICT use.

90
In this study, it was expected to find a relationship between age and work

experience significantly explain more of the variance in work/life balance over and

beyond Information Communication Technology (ICT) demands and perceived stress

over and beyond work/life balance for public child welfare middle managers. Zickuhr

(2011) noted that concerning age and ICT, individuals who fall within the age range of

Millennials (age 18 – 34 years) are likely to own and utilize the functions on most of the

advanced technology (smart phones, laptops, and tablets). Kubiatko et al. (2015)

contend that Millennials tend to be problem solvers skillful in multitasking and using ICT

more for retrieving information and intermingling with others than older generations.

Zickuhr (2011) further noted that members of Generation X (age 35 – 46 years) are

comparable to the Millennials; however, they are not as likely to prefer to utilize the

maximum functionality of the devices to the extent as the Millennials. Kubiatko (2013)

expounded that Millennials’ attitudes towards work and ICT were more positive than the

Generation Xers (age 35-46). Based upon the review of this literature, it was expected

that the independent variables for R2 and R4, age and work experience, would have a

significant relationship with the work/life balance and perceived stress. However, the

results did not correspond with expectations concerning this matter.

There was a significant, negative relationship between Information

Communication Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child

welfare middle managers. As ICT demands increased, there was a corresponding

decrease in work/life balance. There was a significant, negative relationship between

work/life balance and perceived stress for public child welfare middle managers. As

work/life balance increased, there was a corresponding decrease in perceived stress. The

91
findings supported the expectations of a correlational relationship between Information

Communication Technology (ICT) demands and work/life balance for public child

welfare middle managers. Public child welfare by its very nature cultivates an

environment that lacks clarity regarding boundary that should create a balance between

work and life for front line workers and middle management because the employees often

times are required to respond to the needs of the children and families served at the time

the need arises. Responding in this manner, often referred to as being on-call, enabled

further by advanced technology such as tablets and smart phones, allows access to

employees at any time, regardless of location and work hours. Research states that an

increase in the requirement in the area of work will lead to an increase in an imbalance

between work and personal time for employees (Živan et al., 2009). ICT allows work to

flow into non-paid work time (life) and life (personal matters) can flow into paid work

time in that management of personal matters often occur through the same type of

technological tools that are provided for enhanced work productivity. Fleck et al. (2014)

contend it is ICT use that has afforded employees the flexibility to manage the various

roles in their lives; however, use of said technology for work during times of non-paid

work time has been negatively connected to individuals’ health, happiness, and welfare.

Based upon the review of this literature, it was expected that Information Communication

Technology (ICT) would have a significant relationship with the work/life balance and

perceived stress. The results were consistent with the expectations concerning this

matter. From the present findings, coupled with past research (Adetayo et al., 2011;

Nam, 2014; Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011; Senarathne Tennakoon et al., 2013; Zuppo,

92
2011), it is evident that advanced technology effects public child welfare middle

managers’ work/life balance.

Limitations

The limitations of the current research study are discussed in this section. The

first limitation is the population of the study. The study focused on public child welfare

middle managers in a Southern state from which the population was sampled. More

specifically, the managers must have supervised for at least one year in public child

welfare to be a respondent in this research. According to the organization’s fiscal year

2014-2015 quarter three report, the total number of Case Manager 4 employed by this

Southern state’s public child welfare agency is 378. The total number of respondents was

108; however, only 103 were eligible for survey participation. By narrowing the

population to public child welfare middle managers in one southern state, the

generalizability of the findings were limited (Remler & Van Ryzin, 2011). One variable

that could be explored with a larger population is gender.

The second limitation was the recruitment method, purposive sampling. The

managers were recruited via work e-mail with the assistance of the Executive Director of

Human Resources (in compliance with the state’s policy regarding mass distribution of e-

mails). However, the recruitment e-mail stipulated that managers could only respond to

the survey during non-paid hours. The initial intent was for the survey to be open for 30

days. However, given the survey launch date and the 30-day period included several

official state observed holidays, the designated period for the survey to be open was 60

days. During the 60-day period, several reminder emails were sent in that the response

rate was low thereby leading to an extension in the survey to allow for saturation.

93
Changing the sampling method to convenience will allow for the use of respondents who

are convenient and meet eligible criteria. This method would allow for the recruitment of

potential participants through venues such as professional human service and/or social

work organizations.

A third limitation is the use of the Internet as a source for data collection is

advantageous for research in that it can be relatively inexpensive. However, there are

limitations associated with the use of the Internet as a data collection apparatus.

Research has shown that the use of the Internet as an instrument to survey may present

the user with problems such as computer issues (hardware and software), variations in

procedures, managing interruptions, and ensuring maintenance (Hewson, Vogel, &

Laurent, 2015).

Implications for Practice

The concept of work/life balance is not new. Researchers have examined the

concept from the implications of the motivations of work outweighing the need to enjoy

life (Sturges & Guest, 2004) to the stresses that lead to increased risk for health concerns

(Abendroth, 2011). Advance technology such as smart phones, laptops, tablets, and

wireless capabilities also known as Information Communication Technology (ICT) have

been introduced as work aides to increase work outcomes. With ICT, the workforce and

individual’s personal lives have numerous ways of staying connected and flexibility in

completing tasks. However, Fleck et al. (2014) remarked that it is this flexibility that

often causes employees to work during non-work time. This research study provided

information about the effect of advance technologies on public child welfare middle

managers’ work/life balance.

94
The findings yielded that as ICT demands increase for public child welfare middle

managers, there was a decrease in work/life balance. Furthermore, as work/life balance

increased, the perceived level of stress decreased. By gaining an understanding of the

effect of advance technology on the effect of public child welfare middle managers’

work/life balance Human service organizations will be able to recruit and retain staff,

more specifically public child welfare middle managers. Maintaining veteran proficient

managers within the organization increases the liklihood of delivery of quality services to

the children and families served through the system. Madden et al. (2014) noted that

high staff turnover in public child welfare leads to unfavorable, sometimes damaging

effects on clients as well as staff.

The Southern state public child welfare agency from which the population was

sampled currently offers front line staff and managers alternative workplace solutions

(AWS). The AWS plan affords employees a minimum of one day a week to work at a

remote location. In so doing, the agency provides employees with cell phones and tablets

that are functional through wireless networks. Employees agree to abide by the state’s

telecommute policy and maintain a regular workday schedule. However, the agency does

not provide the employees with a best practices policy for managing the flexibility of

AWS. When organizations show concern for their employees by establishing policies to

enhance work/life balance the organizations may entice and retain staff (Munn, 2013;

Singh, 2013).

Recommendations for Further Research

Whereas this study provided an examination of the effects of technology advances

upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance, future research should

95
consider the following recommendations. The first recommendation would be to

reproduce the current study to include managers of public child welfare organizations

from several states. This would increase the generalizability of the conclusions. It is also

suggested that a comparison among the groups (separated geographically) is investigated

to ascertain if differences exists.

The next recommendation for further research is to conduct a qualitative

interview research study. According to Merriam (2009), qualitative researchers are

interested in comprehending how people give meaning to their world and the occurrences

and/or events they have in the world. Qualitative interviews will allow researchers to

glean a better understanding of how ICT use penetrates the boundaries of work/life

balance for public child welfare middle managers.

The final recommendation is for future research to consider the effect of ICT use

on work/life balance and secondary trauma for public child welfare professionals.

Professionals who care for others are at risk of experiencing burnout or secondary trauma

(Wagaman, Geiger, Shockley, & Segal, 2015). This will provide additional data to make

further assumptions on establishing healthy work/life balances.

Conclusion

Chapter 5 brings to a close this research study on the effects of technology

advances upon public child welfare middle managers’ work/life balance. Past research

(Adetayo et al., 2011; Nam, 2014; Senarathne Tennakoon, 2011; Senarathne Tennakoon

et al., 2013; Zuppo, 2011) provided evidence on how ICT use continues to impede on

the lives of employees as they seek to find balance between work, family, and leisure.

This research study added to the research by showing how those in the helping

96
profession of public child welfare are impacted by ICT use. The present research

substantiated a statistical correlation that as ICT demands increased, work/life balance

decreased. In other words, as the tools given to help the helpers become more advance,

the helpers themselves need more help. Furthermore, the present research substantiated

a statistical correlation that as work/life balance increased; there was a corresponding

decrease in perceived stress. Thus, the more balance the helper acquires, the less stress

the helper perceives.

97
REFERENCES

Abendroth, A.-K. (2011). Support for the work-life balance in Europe: The impact of
state, workplace and family support on work-life balance satisfaction. Work
Employment & Society, 25(2), 234 - 256. doi:10.1177/0950017011398892

Adetayo, E. D., Olaoye, I. K., & Awolaja, A. M. (2011). Work–life balance perception
and ICT usage by staff of private universities in South-Western Nigeria.
Information and Knowledge Management, 1(4), 19-32.

Administration for Children and Families. (2016, January 25). Child Maltreatment 2014.
Retrieved from: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/resource/child-
maltreatment-2014

Auerbach, C., McGowan, B. G., Ausberger, A., Strolin-Goltzman, J., & Schudrich, W.
(2010). Differential factors influencing public and voluntary child welfare
workers' intention to leave. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1396 -
1402. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.06.008

Beyers, R. N. (2009). A five dimensional model for educating the Net Generation.
Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 218 - 227.

Bluman, A. G. (2009). Elementary statistics (7th ed.). New York, New York: McGraw-
Hill.

Boyas, J. F., Wind, L. H., & Ruiz, E. (2013). Organizational tenure among child welfare
workers, burnout, stress, and intent to leave: Does employment-based social
capital make a difference? Children and Youth Services Review, 35(10), 1657 -
1669. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.07.008

Boyas, J., & Wind, L. H. (2010). Employment-based social capital, job stress, and
employee burnout: A public child welfare employee structural model. Children
and Youth Services Review, 2010, 32, 3, 380-388, 32(3), 380 - 388.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.009

Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2009). SPSS for psychologists, (4th ed.). New York,
NY: Routledge.

Brady, B. R., Vodanovich, S. J., & Rotunda, R. (2008). The impact of workaholism on
work-family conflict, job satisfaction, and perception of leisure activities. The
Psychologist Manager Journal, 11(2), 241 - 263.
doi:10.1080/10887150802371781

Buonocore, F., Russo, M., & Ferrara, M. (2015). Work–family conflict and job
insecurity: are workers from different generations experiencing true differences?
Journal of Community, Work & Family, 18(3), 299 - 316.
doi:10.1080/13668803.2014.981504

98
Caldari, K. (2007). Alfred Marshall's critical analysis of scientific management.
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14(1), 55 - 78.
doi:10.1080/09672560601168405

Callicutt, J. W., & Lecca, P. J. (1983). Social work and mental health. New York, NY:
Free Press.

Cardona, M., Kretschmer, T., & Strobel, T. (2013). ICT and productivity: Conclusions
from the empirical literature. Information Economics and Policy, 25(3) 109 - 125.
doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.12.002

Cegarra-Leiva, D., Sánchez-Vidal, M., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. (2012). Work life balance
and the retention of managers in Spanish SMEs. International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 23(1), 91 - 108.

Chimote, N. K., & Srivastava, V. N. (2013). Work-Life Balance Benefits:From the


Perspective of Organizations and Employees. IUP Journal of Management
Research, 12(1), 62 - 73.

Chung, C. H. (2013). The road not taken: Putting "management" back to Taylor's
scientific management. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (1947-2900), 5(1),
45 - 56.

Cogin, J. (2012). Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-
country evidence and implications. International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 23(11), 2268 - 2294. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.610967

Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY:
Academic Press.

Cohen, S. (2015). Laboratory for the study of stress, immunity and disease [psy.cmu.edu:
http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~scohen/].

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Memelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress.
Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods


approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crosson-Tower, C. (2010). Understanding child abuse and neglect (8th ed.). Boston,
MA: Pearson Education.

Currie, J., & Eveline, J. (2011). E-technology and work/life balance for academics with
young children. Higher Education, 62(4), 533 - 550. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-
9404-9

99
Darcy, C., McCarthy, A., Hill, J., & Grady, G. (2012). Work–life balance: One size fits
all? An exploratory analysis of the differential effects of career stage. European
Management Journal, 30(2), 111 - 120. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2011.11.001

Day, A., Paquet, S., Scott, N., & Hambley, L. (2012). Perceived information and
communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: The
moderating effect of organizational ICT support. Journal of Occupation Health
Psychology, 17(4), 473 - 491. doi:10.1037/a0029837

Deery, M., & Jago, L. (2015). Revisiting talent management, work-life balance and
retention strategies. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, 27(3), 453 - 474. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-12-2013-0538

Derksen, M. (2014). Turning men into machines? Scientific management, industrial


psychology, and the "human factor". Journal of the History of Behavioral
Sciences, 50(2), 148-165. doi:10.1002/jhbs.21650

Downs, S., Moore, E., & McFadden, E. J. (2009). Child Welfare and Family Services
Policies and Practices. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Ehrenreich, J. H. (2014). The altruistic imagination: A history of social work and social
policy in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Ellett, A. J. (2009). Intentions to remain employed in child welfare: The role of human
caring, self-efficacy beliefs, and professional organizational culture. Children and
Youth Services Review, 31(1), 78 - 88. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.07.002

Evans, A. M., Carney, J. S., & Wilkinson, M. (2013). Work-life balance for men:
Counseling implications. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(4), 436 - 441.
doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00115.x

Falzon, C. (2012). Technology: Master or servant of a spiritual life? (Doctoral


dissertation) Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
(1399189022).

Faul, F., Erfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical
power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior
Research Methods, 39, 175-191.

Feeney, M. K., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Staying late: Comparing work hours in public and
nonprofit sectors. The American Review of Public Adminstration, 39(5) 459 - 477.
doi: 10.1177/0275074008327293.

Fleck, R., Robison, R. A., & Cox, A. L. (2014). Balancing boundaries: The role of
technology boundary work in managing work-life balance. Depression, 14:15.

100
Folkman, S. (1997). Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Social
Science & Medicine, 45(8), 1207 - 12221. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00040-3

Fouche, C., & Martindale, K. (2011). Work-life balance: Practitioner well-being in the
social work education curriculum. Social Work Education, 30(6), 675 - 685.
doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.586566

Frishman, N. (2012). The contribution of three social psychological theories:


Fundamental cause theory, stress process model, and social cognitive theory to
the understanding of health disparities - a longitudinal comparison. (Doctoral
dissertation). Retrieved ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (1270791376)

Galinsky, E., & Stein, P. J. (1990). The impact of human resource policies on employees:
Balancing work/family Life. Journal of Family Isssues, 11(4), 368-383.
doi:10.1177/019251390011004002

Heorhiadi, A., Conbere, J., & Hazelbaker, C. (2014). Virtue vs. virus. Organization
Development Practitioner, 2014, 46, 3, 27-31, , 46, 27-31.

Hershey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2007). Management of organizational


behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Printice Hall.

Hewson, C., Vogel, C., & Laurent, D. (2015). Internet research methods (2nd ed.). LA,
CA: Sage.

Hubers, C., Schwanen, T., & Dijst, M. (2011). Coordinating everyday life in the
Netherlands. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, 57 - 82.

Humphrey, J. (2009). Officing: Professionals' daily ICT use and the changing space and
time of work. (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from Research Direct Library.
(http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/485557)

Jeacle, I., & Parker, L. (2013). The ‘problem’ of the office: Scientific management,
governmentality and the strategy of efficiency. Business History, 55(7), 1074-
1099. doi:doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2013.838034

Keeton, K., Fenner, D. E., Johnson, T. R., & Hayward, R. A. (2007). Predictors of
physician career satisfaction, work-life balance, and burnout. Obstetrics and
Gynecology, 109(4), 949 - 955. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000258299.45979.37

Kim, H. (2011). Job conditions, unmet expectations, and burnout in public child welfare
workers: How different from other social workers? Children and Youth Services
Review, 33(2), 358 - 367. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.10.001

Kim, H., & Ji, J. (2009). Factor structure and longitudinal invariance of the Maslach
Burnout Inventory. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(3), 325 - 333.

101
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges:
Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of
Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669916.

Kubiatko, M. (2013). The comparison of different age groups on the attitudes toward and
the use of ICT. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1263 - 1272.

Kubiatko, M., Halakova, Z., Nagy, T., & Nagyova, S. (2015). The using of and attitudes
toward Internet and information and communication technologies in different age
groups. Journal of Current Issues in Media and Telecommunications, 7(3), 269 -
281.

Kumar, H., & Chakraborty, S. K. (2013). Work life balance (WLB): A key to
organizational efficacy. Prin.LN Welingkar Institute of Management Development
& Research, 15(1), 62 - 70.

Lee, J., Forster, M., & Rehner, T. (2011). The retention of public child welfare workers:
The roles of professional organizational culture and coping strategies. Children
and Youth Services Review, 33(1), 102 - 109.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.019

Lee, J., Weaver, C., & Hrostowski, S. (2011). Psychological empowerment and child
welfare worker outcomes: A path analysis. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40(6),
479 -497. doi:10.1007/s10566-011-9145-7

Leiter, M. P., Bakker, A. B., & Maslach, C. (2014). Burnout at work: A psychological
perspective. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Leung, L., & Zhang, R. (2016). Mapping ICT use at home and telecommuting practices:
A perspective from work/family border theory. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1),
385 – 396. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.001

Li, X., Li, X. R., & Hudson, S. (2013). The application of generational theory to tourism
consumer behavior: An American perspective. Tourism Management, 37, 147–
164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.01.015

Lingard, H., Brown, K., Bradley, L., Bailey, C., & Townsend, K. (2007). Improving
employees’ work-life balance in the construction industry: Project alliance case
study. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 133(10), 807 - 815.
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(807)

Lizano, E. L., & Mor Barak, M. (2015). Job burnout and affective wellbeing: A
longitudinal study of burnout and job satisfaction among public child welfare
workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 55, 18 - 28.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.005

102
Lizano, E. L., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2012). Workplace demands and resources as
antecedents of job burnout among public child welfare workers: A longitudinal
study. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1769 – 1776.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.006

Lunau, T., Bambra, C., Eikemo, T., van der Wel, K., & Dragano, N. (2014). A balancing
act? Work-life balance, health and well-being in European welfare states.
European .Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 422 - 427. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku010

Madden, E. E., Scannapieco, M., & Painter, K. (2014). An examination of retention and
length of employment among public child welfare workers. Children and Youth
Services Review, 41, 37 - 44. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.015

Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. (1997). The Maslach Burnout Inventory
Manual. In C. P. Zalaquett, & R. J. Wood, Evaluating Stress: A Book of
Resources (pp. 191 - 218). Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.

McCrae, J. S., Scannapieco, M., Leake, R., Potter, C. C., & Menefee, D. (2014). Who's
on board? Child welfare worker reports of buy-in and readiness for organizational
change. Children and Youth Services Review, 37, 28 - 35.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.12.001

McLeod, J. D. (2012). The Meanings of stress: Expanding the stress process model.
Society and Mental Health, 2(3), 172 - 186. doi:10.1177/2156869312452877

Meriac, J., Woehr, D., & Banister, C. (2010). Generational differences in work ethic: An
examination of measurement equivalence across three cohorts. Journal of
Business & Psychology, 25(2), 315 - 324. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7

Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative reserach, a guide to design and implementation. San


Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Munn, S. L. (2013). Unveiling the work–life system: The influence of work–life balance
on meaningful work. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15(4), 401 –
417. doi:10.1177/1523422313498567

Munn, S. L., Rocco, T. S., Bowman, L., & van Loo, J. B. (2011). Work-life research and
the representation of sexual minorities. Paper presented at the Seventh
International Critical Conference, Naples, Italy.

Nam, T. (2014). Technology use and work-life balance. Applied Research in Quality of
Life, 9(4), 1017 - 1040. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9283-1

National Associaton of Social Workers. (2016). Social work matters. Retrieved from
http://www.naswpress.org/publications/practice/social-work-matters.html

103
Netemeyer, R. G., & Boles, J. S. (1996). Development and validation of Work-Family
Conflict and Family-Work Conflict Scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4),
400 - 410.

Newell, L. A. (2015). Redefining attention (and revamping the legal profession?) for the
Digital Generation. Nevada Law Journal, 15, 754 - 826.

O'Connor, C., Laszewski, A., Hammel, J., & Durkin, M. S. (2011). Using portable
computers in home visits: Effects on programs, data quality, home visitors and
caregivers. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1318 - 1324.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.006

Parris, M., Vickers, M., & Wilkes, L. (2008). Caught in the middle: organizational
impediments to middle managers’ work-life balance. Employee Responsibilities &
Rights Journal, 101-117. doi:10.1007/s10672-008-9069-z.

Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational differences in work values: A review of
theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79 -
96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x

Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational differences in work values: A review of
theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79 -
96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x

Payne, R. D. (2013). Relationship between burnout and organizational citizenship


behavior among human service employees. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved
from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (1346227593).

Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress
process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(4), 337 - 356.

Pecora, P. J., Whittaker, J. K., Maluccio, A. N., & Barth, R. P. (2012). The child welfare
challenge: Policy, practice, and research. New Brunswick, ME: Aldine
Transaction.

Perlow, L. A., & Porter, J. L. (2009). Making time off predictable and required. Harvard
Business Review, 87(10), 102-109.

Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Hierarchical multiple regression in counseling research: Common


problems and possible remedies. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling &
Development (American Counseling Association), 36(1), 9 - 24.

Pichler, F. (2009). Determinants of work-life balance: Shortcomings in the contemporary


measurement of WLB in large-scale surveys. Social Indicators Research, 92(3),
449 - 469. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9297-5

104
Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on
research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
52(2), 126 - 136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126

Ponterotto, J. G. (2010). Qualitative research in multicultural psychology: Philosophical


underpinnings, popular approaches, and ethical considerations. Cultural Diversity
and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 581 - 589.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1037/a0012051

Reisch, M., & Andrews, J. (2014). The road not taken: A history of radical social work in
the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.

Remler, D., & Van Ryzin, G. (2011). Research methods in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.

Salloum, A., Kondrat, D. C., Johnco, C., & Olson, K. R. (2015). The role of self-care on
compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary trauma among child welfare
workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 49, 54 - 61.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.023

Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364 -
379. doi: 10.1108/00012530910973776.

Senarathne Tennakoon, K. L. (2011). Empowerment or enslavement: ICT use and work-


life balance of managers and professionals. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (881649229).

Senarathne Tennakoon, K. L., da Silveira, G. J., & Taras, D. G. (2013). Drivers of


context-specific ICT use across work and nonwork domains: A boundary theory
perspective. Information and Organization, 23(2), 10 - 128.
doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.03.002

Sieber, J. E., & Tolich, M. B. (2012). Planning ethically responsible research. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.

Singh, S. (2013). Work life balance: A literature review. Global Journal of Commerce &
Management Perspective, 2(3), 84 - 91.

Smith, B. D. (2005). Job retention in child welfare: Effects of perceived organizational


support, supervisor support, and intrinsic job value. Children and Youth Services
Review, 27(2), 153 - 159. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.08.013

Smith, R. J., & Eaton, T. (2014). Information and communication technology in child
welfare: The need for culture-centered computing. Journal of Sociology & Social
Welfare(37), 137 - 160.

105
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America's future, 1584–
2069. New York, NY: William Morrow.

Sturges, J., & Guest, D. (2004). Working to live or living to work? Work/life balance
early in the career. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 5 - 20.
doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00130.x

Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of Scientific Management. New York, NY: Harper.

Tilbury, C. (2004). The influence of performance measurement on child welfare policy


and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34(2), 225-241.
doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch023

Tregeagle, S., & Darcy, M. (2008). Child welfare and information and communication
technology: Today’s challenge. British Journal of Social Work, 38(8), 1481-1498.
doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm048

Treiman, D. J. (2009). Quantitative data analysis. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.

Trochim, W. M. (2006). Survey research. Retrieved from Research Methods Knowledge


Base: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/ethics.php.

Twenge, J. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in


work attitudes. Journal of Business & Psychology, 2010, 25, 2, 201-210, 25(2),
201 - 210. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9165-6

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979, April 18). The Belmont Report.
Retrieved from hhs.gov:
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html

United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2012, August). Child welfare
information gateway. Retrieved from:
https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/cw_educators.pdf

US Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). State statutes search. Retrieved
from: https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/systemwide/laws-
policies/state/?CWIGFunctionsaction=statestatutes:main.getResults

Wagaman, A. M., Geiger, J. M., Shockley, C., & Segal, E. A. (2015). The role of
empathy in burnout, Compassion Satisfaction, and Secondary Traumatic Stress
among Social Workers. Journal of the National Association of Social Workers,
60(3), 201 - 209. doi:10.1093/sw/swv014

Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. (2008). Scientific management revisited: Did Taylorism fail


because of a too positive image of human nature? Journal of Management
History, 14(4), 348 - 372.

106
Wajcman, J., Rose, E., Brown, J. E., & Bittman, M. (2010). Enacting virtual connections
between work and home. Journal of sociology. 46(3), 257 - 275.
doi:10.1177/1440783310365583

Wampold, B. E., & Freund, R. D. (1987). Use of multiple regression in counseling


psychology research: A flexible data-analytic strategy. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 34(4), 372 - 382. doi:0022-0167/87/MO. 75

Waumsley, J. A., Houston, D. M., & Marks, G. (2010). What about us? Measuring the
work-life balance of people who do not have children. Review of european studies
2(2), 3 - 18.

Weaver, D., Chang, J., Clark, S., & Rhee, S. (2007). Keeping public child welfare
workers on the job. Administration in Social Work, 31(2), 5 -25.

West, D., & Heath, D. (2011). Theoretical pathways to the future: Globalization, ICT and
social work theory and practice. Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 209 - 221.
doi:10.1177/1468017310386835

Westbrook, T. M., Ellett, A. J., & Asberg, K. (2012). Predicting public child welfare
employees' intentions to remain employed with the child welfare organizational
culture inventory. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(7), 1214 - 1221.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.010

Westbrook, T. M., Ellis, J., & Ellett, A. J. (2006). Improving retention among public
child welfare workers: What can we learn from the insights and experiences of
committed survivors? Administration in Social Work, 30(4), 37-62.

Wu, L., Rusyidi, B., Claiborne, N., & McCarthy, M. L. (2013). Relationships between
work–life balance and job-related factors among child welfare workers. Children
and Youth Services Review, 35(9), 1447 - 1454.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.05.017

Yang, S.-B., & Guy, M. E. (2006). GenXers versus Boomers: Work motivators and
management implications. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(3),
267 - 284.

Yankeelov, P. A., Barbee, A. P., Sullivan, D., & Antle, B. F. (2009). Individual and
organizational factors in job retention in Kentucky's child welfare agency.
Children and Youth Services Review, 31(5), 547 - 554.
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.10.014

Zickuhr, K. (2011). Generations and their gadgets. Pew Internet & American Life
Project, 20. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-
media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Generations_and_Gadgets.pdf

107
Živan, R., Neđo, B., & Pere, T. (2009). Work-life balance, processes of organization and
performance: Rationale for an empirical research. Strategic Management, 14(1),
37-47. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

108
STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL WORK

Academic Honesty Policy

Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy (3.01.01) holds learners accountable for
the integrity of work they submit, which includes but is not limited to discussion
postings, assignments, comprehensive exams, and the dissertation or capstone project.
Established in the Policy are the expectations for original work, rationale for the policy,
definition of terms that pertain to academic honesty and original work, and disciplinary
consequences of academic dishonesty. Also stated in the Policy is the expectation that
learners will follow APA rules for citing another person’s ideas or works.

The following standards for original work and definition of plagiarism are discussed in
the Policy:
Learners are expected to be the sole authors of their work and to acknowledge the
authorship of others’ work through proper citation and reference. Use of another
person’s ideas, including another learner’s, without proper reference or citation
constitutes plagiarism and academic dishonesty and is prohibited conduct. (p. 1)

Plagiarism is one example of academic dishonesty. Plagiarism is presenting


someone else’s ideas or work as your own. Plagiarism also includes copying
verbatim or rephrasing ideas without properly acknowledging the source by
author, date, and publication medium. (p. 2)

Capella University’s Research Misconduct Policy (3.03.06) holds learners accountable for
research integrity. What constitutes research misconduct is discussed in the Policy:
Research misconduct includes but is not limited to falsification, fabrication,
plagiarism, misappropriation, or other practices that seriously deviate from those
that are commonly accepted within the academic community for proposing,
conducting, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. (p. 1)

Learners failing to abide by these policies are subject to consequences, including but not
limited to dismissal or revocation of the degree.

109
Statement of Original Work and Signature

I have read, understood, and abided by Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy
(3.01.01) and Research Misconduct Policy (3.03.06), including Policy Statements,
Rationale, and Definitions.
I attest that this dissertation or capstone project is my own work. Where I have used the
ideas or words of others, I have paraphrased, summarized, or used direct quotes following
the guidelines set forth in the APA Publication Manual.

Learner name
and date Gail P McWhite Seymour August 29, 2016

110

You might also like