Atp 6-02X70 Spectrum MGT Ops
Atp 6-02X70 Spectrum MGT Ops
Atp 6-02X70 Spectrum MGT Ops
70
DECEMBER 2015
Contents
Page
PREFACE..............................................................................................................iv
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... v
Chapter 1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 1-1
Electromagnetic Spectrum ................................................................................. 1-1
Definition ............................................................................................................. 1-3
Objective ............................................................................................................. 1-4
Core Functions ................................................................................................... 1-5
Army Spectrum Management Operations Process ............................................ 1-5
Chapter 2 TACTICAL STAFF ORGANIZATION AND PLANNING ................................... 2-1
Spectrum Management Operations for Corps and Below .................................. 2-1
Division, Brigade and Battalion Spectrum Operations ....................................... 2-3
Spectrum Managers Assigned to Cyber Electromagnetic Activity Working
Group .................................................................................................................. 2-3
Cyber Electromagnetic Activities Element .......................................................... 2-4
Tips for Spectrum Managers .............................................................................. 2-6
The Military Decisionmaking Process ................................................................ 2-7
Support to the MDMP Steps ............................................................................... 2-8
The Common Operational Picture .................................................................... 2-10
Chapter 3 SUPPORT TO THE WARFIGHTING FUNCTIONS ........................................... 3-1
Movement and Maneuver ................................................................................... 3-1
Intelligence ......................................................................................................... 3-1
Fires .................................................................................................................... 3-1
Sustainment ........................................................................................................ 3-2
Mission Command .............................................................................................. 3-2
i
Preface
Figures
Figure 1-1. Electromagnetic spectrum competition ............................................................... 1-3
Figure 1-2. The electromagnetic operational environment (EMOE) ...................................... 1-4
Figure 1-3. Army spectrum management operations process ............................................... 1-6
Figure 2-1. Use of the electromagnetic spectrum .................................................................. 2-2
Figure 2-2. CEMA working group organizational framework ................................................. 2-5
Figure 2-3. Key SMO inputs to the MDMP............................................................................. 2-8
Figure 3-1. Spectrum situational awareness system and CJSMPT support to mission
command ............................................................................................................ 3-3
Figure 4-1. Interagency workflow in a joint task force environment ....................................... 4-1
Figure 4-2. JFMO structure .................................................................................................... 4-2
Figure 4-4. Spectrum manager inputs for a JSME ................................................................ 4-6
Figure 4-5. Spectrum management support during domestic operations .............................. 4-8
Figure 5-1. S2AS and supporting equipment ......................................................................... 5-2
Figure 5-2. S2AS in use by Soldiers ...................................................................................... 5-3
Figure 5-3. S2A2 functional relationships .............................................................................. 5-4
Figure A-1. The SMO to EW collaboration process ............................................................... A-9
Figure A-2. The G-6 or S-6 spectrum manager’s tasks ...................................................... A-10
Figure A-3. The CEMA element tasks ................................................................................. A-12
Figure A-4. SMO collaboration tasks ................................................................................... A-13
Figure C-1. Waveform characteristics .................................................................................... C-1
Tables
Table 4-1. Agency inputs to the JFMO ................................................................................... 4-2
Table 4-2. Products of the JFMO ........................................................................................... 4-3
Table 4-3. Agency inputs to the JSME ................................................................................... 4-4
Table 4-4. Products of the JSME............................................................................................ 4-5
Table B-1. Compatibility between SMO tools .........................................................................B-1
Table B-2. SMO tool capabilities ............................................................................................B-2
Table D-1. Call signs, call words, suffix and expander ......................................................... D-5
Table D-2. Data input for JSIR offline reporting .................................................................... D-7
Table E-1. Example of world time zone conversion (standard time) ......................................E-3
Appendix D introduces the 12-step spectrum management lifecycle. This process serves as a guide to follow
in establishing a functional and efficient spectrum management program. The lifecycle encompasses the
complete process of providing spectrum management operations support to the commander and is applicable
to all spectrum managers regardless of duty location. The Army spectrum management lifecycle mirrors the
joint task force lifecycle adapted for the Army spectrum manager.
Appendix E provides the reader with an overview of the military time zone designators. This appendix
describes time zones for civilian and military uses. The chart, included in this appendix, provides a valuable
tool to reference time zones in all parts of the world.
ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM
1-1. The electromagnetic spectrum is a continuum of all electromagnetic waves arranged according to
frequency and wavelength. Multiple radiated signals coexist in the same physical space and selectively
detected using the appropriate equipment and channel. The spectrum extends from below the frequencies
used for radio (at the long-wavelength end) through gamma radiation (at the short-wavelength end). Divided
into alphabetically designated bands for specific wavelengths and frequency ranges, the spectrum
encompasses wavelengths from thousands of kilometers to a fraction of an atom. Radio signals are able to
coexist in the same physical space. Radio frequency spectrum is the continuum of frequencies of
electromagnetic radiation from 3,000 Hertz (Hz) or 3 kilohertz (kHz) to 300 gigahertz (GHz). Isolation of
multiple users of spectrum is possible by allocating different bands of this continuum to them.
Constrained Environment
1-2. Gaining and maintaining control of the electromagnetic spectrum is a critical requirement for the
commander. From communications, to intelligence collection, to electronic warfare, all forces, and
supporting agencies depend on the electromagnetic spectrum to execute operations in the air, land, maritime,
space, and cyberspace domains. Within the electromagnetic spectrum, joint forces contend with civil
agencies, commercial entities, allied forces, and adversaries for use of a common electromagnetic spectrum
resource. This demand for electromagnetic spectrum use results in a constrained, congested, and contested
environment that affects operations across all domains and functions. This contention and competition
produces a constrained environment regarding how, when, and where to use electromagnetic spectrum
resources.
1-3. Congestion in the electromagnetic spectrum results when multiple users attempt to use the same
portions of the spectrum simultaneously. This competition and congestion can potentially lead to the
operational failure of systems during critical missions due to electromagnetic interference. Adversaries can
exploit modern technologies to develop sophisticated electronic attack capabilities, contesting the ability of
all military assets to access and use the electromagnetic spectrum.
1-4. Army spectrum managers’ tasks include planning, managing, coordinating, and providing policies and
regulations for the use of the electromagnetic spectrum. The Army shares spectrum related resources with
other Services, civilian counterparts, and friendly forces. Due to the large quantity of devices and forces using
the spectrum, portions maybe unavailable. Environmental factors such as solar activity and weather can
adversely affect SMO. The Army spectrum manager uses knowledge and spectrum management tools to
determine how to best support a mission with limited spectrum resources. Solutions can be as simple as
having a unit switch to a different frequency or as complex as adjusting the entire spectrum plan. There are
times when the commander prioritizes spectrum use to conduct operations.
1-7. Spectrum users should understand that it is not a replaceable resource like fuel or ammunition. Once
the allotted spectrum to support a specific capability or system is in use, it is no longer available for use
depending upon system and environmental variables. The commander may need to operationally assess the
impact of sacrificing other potentially critical capabilities to ensure the use of another spectrum dependent
user. Spectrum management operations are the oversight of all characteristics of electromagnetic radiation.
The goal is to protect systems from harmful interference while allowing the optimum use of the spectrum.
The process is complex since the characteristics of electromagnetic radiation vary with time, space, and
frequency.
1-8. Figure 1-1, on page 1-3, displays a portion of the spectrum used by various systems and devices both
commercial and military that compete for these bands (acronyms in graphic are not essential to understanding
the text).
DEFINITION
1-9. SMO are the interrelated functions of spectrum management, frequency assignment, host nation
coordination, and policy that together enable the planning, management, and execution of operations within
the electromagnetic operational environment (EMOE), during all phases of military operations. The portions
of the electromagnetic spectrum, experienced and influenced by military operations is the EMOE.
Electromagnetic spectrum operations include electronic warfare for which the Cyber Center of Excellence is
the proponent. Electromagnetic spectrum operations includes all activities in military operations to control
the spectrum. SMO is the management portion of electromagnetic spectrum operations. Figure 1-2, on page
1-4, depicts the various areas of responsibility as they pertain to EMOE.
1-10. Army spectrum managers coordinate and collaborate with spectrum managers working in joint
environments. Collaboration with joint personnel is common and necessary for the Army spectrum manager
while using the highly saturated and limited spectrum available. The primary goal of joint electromagnetic
spectrum operations is to enable SDD to perform their functions in the intended environment without causing
or suffering unacceptable interference. Joint electromagnetic spectrum operations are those activities
consisting of electronic warfare and joint electromagnetic spectrum management operations used to exploit,
attack, protect, and manage the electromagnetic operational environment to achieve the commander’s
objectives.
OBJECTIVE
1-12. The objective of Army SMO is to ensure access to the electromagnetic spectrum in support of users
conducting the Army’s operational missions. SMO enables the allotment of the vital, but limited, natural
resource that directly supports operational forces throughout the world. The Army is dependent upon the use
of the radio frequency spectrum at all levels of unified land operations. An effective spectrum management
operations program enables electronic systems to perform their functions in the intended environment
without causing or suffering unacceptable performance.
1-13. Commanders must have the ability to see the use of their assigned spectrum resources so they can
apply systematic management controls in the logistics and mission command arenas. The electromagnetic
spectrum is a vital warfighting resource that requires the same planning and management as other critical
resources such as fuel, water, and ammunition. Spectrum managers, with the appropriate expertise and tools,
ensure that commanders have adequate knowledge of the utilization of the frequency spectrum to make
decisions that positively influence accomplishment of their missions.
CORE FUNCTIONS
1-14. The SMO core functions determine the tasks and requirements of the Army spectrum manager. These
four functions are—
Spectrum Management: Spectrum management is the planning, coordinating, and managing
of joint use of the electromagnetic spectrum through operational, engineering, and administrative
procedures. Spectrum management consists of evaluating and mitigating electromagnetic
environmental effects, managing frequency records and databases, de-conflicting frequencies,
frequency interference mitigation, allotting frequencies, spectrum supportability assessments, and
electronic warfare coordination to ensure SDD operate as intended.
Frequency Assignment: The request and issuance of authorizations to use frequencies for
specific equipment such as combat net radio and Army common user systems is a task of frequency
assignment. This also includes the planning necessary for combat net radio, Army common user
systems, and associated systems. Examples of frequency assignment are assigning the frequencies
necessary to generate single-channel ground and airborne radio system (SINCGARS) hopsets,
providing frequencies for unmanned aerial systems and line of sight networks, or assigning
frequencies for the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) network.
Host Nation (HN) Coordination: Each nation has sovereignty over its electromagnetic
spectrum within its geographic area and negotiates the use of the spectrum on a case-by-case basis.
A representative of the sovereign country evaluates each Department of Defense (DOD) request
for the use of spectrum based on the perceived potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) to
local receivers. Use of military or commercial spectrum systems in host nations requires
coordination and negotiation that result in formal approvals and certifications.
Policy Adherence: The commanders ability to access and maneuver within the electromagnetic
spectrum is dependent on policy. Policy are those authoritative instruments from the national
strategic through the tactical level that nest and shape the spectrum management, frequency
assignment, and host nation coordination process. Countries coordinate global international
spectrum use through the International Telecommunications Union and the World Radio
Communication Conference. At the U.S. national level under U.S. Code Title 47, the division of
spectrum management responsibility rests with the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) for federal frequencies and the Federal Communications Commission for
non-federal frequencies. The Military Communications-Electronics Board (MCEB) is the main
coordinating body for spectrum matters among DOD components. Overseas, the U.S. mission,
working with DOD strategic partners, negotiates treaties and agreements when stationed or
training U.S. forces are within a host nation. These agreements establish lines of communications
between the host-nation and senior military commands to negotiate spectrum usage in support of
training and operations. Examples of policy instruments include International
Telecommunications Union and World Radio Communication Conference agreements, status of
forces agreements, host-nation agreements, operational orders, U.S. Code Title 47, and operations
plans.
PLANNING
1-16. SMO planning includes the identification of spectrum requirements for training, pre-deployment,
deployment, and reconstitution of Army forces, both in and outside the continental U.S. SMO planning is an
on-going process that must be deliberate as well as dynamic to support unified land operations. It requires
the collection, storage, and protection of critical spectrum data, and assured access to this data by spectrum
planners on a global scale. Additionally, planning for the establishment of lines of communications for
coordination of spectrum use with national and international government and non-government agencies is
critical to the spectrum planning process.
1-17. The CEMA element and the CEMA working group have an assigned spectrum manager that provides
expertise in planning and coordinating horizontally and vertically to support unified land operations. The
spectrum manager’s primary role is to assist with de-conflicting detection and delivery assets through the
planning and targeting processes.
COORDINATING
1-18. Coordination ensures initial spectrum availability and supportability for operations. Lines of
communication for coordinating spectrum allocation at the national and international level are primarily a
matter of policy established in the planning process. Enemy nations or their military do not receive U.S. host
nation coordination. Spectrum managers coordinate adjacent countries spectrum, particularly if forces stage,
train, or operate within these countries, to include airspace, sovereign waters, and frequencies for satellites.
Coordination at the operational Army level requires prior coordination as well as a dynamic, instantaneous
collaboration tool.
1-19. Staff Coordination-Spectrum managers coordinate with various staff sections to ensure effective
SMO. Commanders engage spectrum managers early in the planning process when forecasting for the use of
spectrum dependent devices. Staff coordination, electronic warfare (EW) coordination, communications
security coordination, satellite coordination, frequency deconfliction, frequency interference resolution, and
joint restricted frequency lists are SMO tasks that support spectrum functions.
1-20. Spectrum managers work with many systems that are not exclusively communications systems. They
must interact with other staff members to provide guidance, assistance, and advice to the commander
regarding the use and prioritization of the spectrum. Systems such as unmanned aerial systems, common user
jammers, radars, navigational aids, and sensors all use the spectrum for operation. Their extensive use and
unique operating characteristics necessitate special planning and coordination to mitigate frequency
fratricide.
1-21. Unified Action Partners-Coordinating spectrum use is the process of collaborating with unified action
partners. Unified action partners are those military forces, governmental and nongovernmental organizations,
and elements of the private sector with which Army forces plan, coordinate, synchronize, and integrate during
the conduct of operations. This function ensures initial spectrum availability and supportability for
operations. Lines of communication for coordinating spectrum allocation at the national and international
levels are primarily a matter of policy established in the planning process.
1-22. Host Nation Coordination-Use of military or commercial spectrum systems in host nations requires
coordination and negotiation that result in formal approvals and certifications. Coordination for use of the
spectrum in host nations is required if forces stage, train, or operate within these countries to include airspace,
sovereign waters, and frequencies for satellites. Prior coordination as well as dynamic, immediate
collaboration tools results in a seamless use of the spectrum. Failure to request frequency usage in a timely
manner results in the inability to operate communications equipment in the host nation. Each nation has
sovereignty over its spectrum within its geographic area and negotiates the use of spectrum on a case-by-case
basis. A representative of the sovereign country evaluates each DOD request for the use of spectrum based
on the perceived potential for EMI to local receivers.
1-23. The host nation spectrum worldwide database online (HNSWDO) is a tool, used by military service
department spectrum management offices, to track DOD host nation spectrum supportability request to
determine equipment supportability. Host nation access request are added to HNSWDO by the sponsoring
service spectrum management agency. Requests are sent to the respective combatant command’s joint
frequency management office (JFMO) to annotate comments in HNSWDO for visibility. Tactical spectrum
managers coordinate frequency assignments through established spectrum coordination channels. Spectrum
management offices assuming the role of the Joint Spectrum Management Element (JSME) may be delegated
by the combatant command JFMO to perform person-to-person host nation coordination in support of joint
task force operations.
1-24. Electronic Warfare Coordination-The spectrum manager should be an integral part of all EW
planning to provide awareness of spectrum conflicts initiated by friendly systems for personnel protection,
enemy exploitation, or enemy denial. The advent of common user “jammers” has made this awareness and
planning critical for the spectrum manager. In addition to jammers, commanders and staffs must consider
non-lethal weapons that use electromagnetic radiation. EW coordination normally takes place in the CEMA
working group. It may take place in the EW Cell if it is operating under a joint construct or operating at a
special echelon.
1-25. Communications Security Coordination-Spectrum managers work closely with communications
security personnel to ensure the proper keying material for the appropriate frequency resource of SINCGARS
loadsets. Spectrum managers only manage and process communications security for SINCGARS by way of
loadsets. They do not manage communications security for other emitters.
1-26. Satellite Coordination-Spectrum managers coordinate with satellite managers to maintain awareness
of channels (frequencies) used by satellite communications systems. The satellite manager generates and
processes satellite access requests. Spectrum managers receive and verify the information provided in the
satellite access request for all satellite communications. Once approved, the spectrum manager enters the
frequencies into the spectrum database for frequency deconfliction with all other emitters in the area of
operations.
Note. Use of the JRFL will not deconflict all frequency issues. The JRFL does not provide
communications planners with frequencies EA systems transmit or the technical information
needed to deconflict EA from friendly operations including lower echelon maneuver forces.
Efficient utilization of spectrum management tools identifies potential interference and frequency
conflicts during mission planning reducing frequency fratricide.
1-30. Interference Resolution-The spectrum manager performs interference resolution at the echelon
receiving the interference. Interference is the radiation, emission, or indication of electromagnetic energy;
either intentionally or unintentionally causing degradation, disruption, or complete obstruction of the
designated function of the electronic equipment affected. The spectrum manager should utilize available
near-real time monitoring and analysis capabilities to aid in the interference resolution. The reporting end
user is responsible for assisting the spectrum manager in tracking, evaluating, and resolving interference.
Appendix D contains further information on frequency interference resolution and reporting.
OPERATING
1-31. The operating activity for SMO enables and sustains the functions of planning and coordinating. It
includes the process to plan, conduct, coordinate, and sustain spectrum operations. SMO ensures the efficient
use of allocated spectrum and associated frequencies in a given area of operations. Spectrum managers use
the operating function to enable dynamic, near instantaneous frequency assignment, re-assignment,
interference mitigation, and frequency deconfliction across all users in an area of operations. The architecture
provides for interoperability with U.S. national, local government and non-government agencies as well as
unified action partners.
Note. SMO is bottom driven for requirements while top fed for resources. The brigade combat
teams represent the pointy end of the spear and it is critical that the staff at each echelon captures
all requirements to ensure commanders receive the proper resources. Maximizing the use of the
spectrum requires coordination between EW, network operations, intelligence staffs, and other
known users.
2-3. Figure 2-1, on page 2-2, illustrates the competing systems that cause challenges throughout the
spectrum. The assistant chief of staff for communications, signal staff officer (G-6) or the battalion or brigade
signal staff officer (S-6) is responsible for coordination with all spectrum users within a given operational
area, to identify all requirements for spectrum access, and to conduct frequency deconflictionThey also
maintain a database of all known emitters and receivers in the operational area to identify and prioritize
competing systems for frequency assignments.
2-12. A spectrum manager’s inherent duties include many affiliations and activities based on their
assignment. Spectrum managers participate in CEMA working groups or CEMA elements as required by the
command. As a member of these groups, they provide the specialized technical knowledge to enable the
working group or element to provide the commander with expert knowledge on spectrum related activities.
2-13. The CEMA working group is responsible for coordinating horizontally and vertically to support unified
land operations and primarily deconflict detection and delivery assets through the planning and targeting
processes. (FM 3-38) Staff representation within the CEMA working group may include the G-2 (S-2),
information operations officer, battalion or brigade civil affairs operations staff officer assistant chief of staff,
civil affairs operations, fire support officer, space support element, judge advocate general representative (or
appropriate legal advisor), and a joint terminal attack controller when assigned. Based on requirements
capabilities, the CEMA working group staff may delete or modify members. The CEMA working group
augments the function of the permanently established CEMA element. When scheduled, the CEMA working
group is a critical planning event integrated into the staff’s battle rhythm.
2-14. The CEMA working group requires a spectrum manager positioned within the working group to
deconflict spectrum, identify conflicts, and mitigate possible frequency fratricide during the planning phase
of all forms of fire. Frequency fratricide is the unintentional interruption of friendly frequencies. Frequency
fratricide can cause many problems for operations and prevention is the key. Spectrum managers provide the
working group with frequency options and advice that follows internal and external policies that minimize
frequency fratricide.
2-15. To accomplish the task of integration of CEMA into all unit operations, the EWO leads the CEMA
working group, which determines EW requirements and integrates these requirements into the unit’s planning
and targeting processes. One role of the EW team in CEMA is to coordinate the operational targeting of
effects in cyberspace.
SPECTRUM MANAGER
2-19. As a key member of the CEMA element, the spectrum manager coordinates spectrum use for a wide
variety of communications and electronic resources. Some of the primary functions the spectrum manager
provides include—
Coordinates the preparation of the JRFL and issuance of emissions control guidance.
Coordinates frequency allotment, assignment, and use.
Coordinates electromagnetic deception plans and operations in which assigned communications
resources participate.
Coordinates measures to eliminate, moderate, or mitigate electromagnetic interference.
Coordinates with higher echelon spectrum managers for electromagnetic interference resolution
they cannot resolve internally.
Assists the EWO in issuing guidance to the unit (including subordinate elements) regarding
deconfliction and resolution of interference problems between EW systems and other friendly
systems.
Participates in the CEMA working group to deconflict friendly spectrum requirements with
planned EW, CO, and intelligence collection.
Synchronizes frequency allotment and assignment use with the G-6 or J-6 spectrum manager.
2-20. The working groups may include, but are not limited to, key members of operations, intelligence,
communications, training, air liaison officer, fires, special technical operations, and liaisons from supported
units. Figure 2-2. CEMA depicts the working group organizational framework.
Note. For more information on the Army spectrum supportability process, see AR 5-12.
Home station operations provide unique challenges and opportunities for tactical spectrum
managers. The challenges come in the form of equipment returning from overseas theaters that
does not have spectrum supportability within U.S. territories.
Another challenge is that the spectrum manager on a post, camp, or station now normally deals
with a civilian counterpart for spectrum support who may not be as familiar with tactical
requirements. Within these challenges lie opportunities for training with other units, agencies, and
directorates on the installation. Informal luncheons or meetings are a good way to share
information and lessons learned from previous experiences.
Note. According to the MCEB Publication 8, complete the spectrum supportability process for all
devices (emitters and receivers) as early as possible to prevent the use or acquisition of a device
that is unsupportable, cause interference, or not authorized for use within the operational area of
a mission.
Determine from governmental and host nation spectrum allocation tables, which frequencies
maybe assigned in a given operational area.
Compiling restrictions or constraints on spectrum use that prevent planning and use of
protected, taboo, and restricted frequencies in the operational area. (see CJCSM 3320-01C,
appendix I, enclosure C for a listing of the worldwide taboo frequencies.
Defining the EMOE provides a common source for spectrum use information, particularly all
available blue (friendly), red (enemy), and grey (neutral and civil) spectrum occupancy.
Step 2: Mission Analysis—
Analyze the EMOE, highlighting unified action partners’ spectrum users, and aid the
commander in determining spectrum priority.
Conducting an initial spectrum risk assessment identifies the spectral impact of a mission on
unified action partners in the operational area. This process also identifies frequency usage
conflicts such as EMI and frequency fratricide.
Generating frequency reuse plans provides for spectrum optimization and increased spectrum
capabilities.
Identifying spectrum constraints where certain frequencies are taboo, such as those not
allocated for use by the host nation.
Determining spectrum capabilities pertaining to combat power, such as EW and counter radio
controlled improvised explosive device electronic warfare systems.
Step 3: Course of Action Development—
Modeling the unit’s boundaries and movement formations, using SMO tools, to develop COA
recommendations.
Performing EMI and EW frequency deconfliction, using SMO tools, for COA development
and spectrum supportability.
Generating frequency allotment and allocation tables for subordinate units.
Identifying the unit’s spectral impact on civilian spectrum users.
Identifying primary, alternate, contingency, and emergency communications for each COA
based on unit capabilities, software simulation, and spectrum supportability.
Step 4: Course of Action Analysis (War Game) —
Depicting the spectrum advantages and disadvantages for each COA.
Identifying mitigating factors for the spectrum risk assessment to reduce or eliminate risks.
Recommending modifications to the COA based on spectrum supportability during the war
game.
Step 5: Course of Action Comparison—
Comparing spectrum use over multiple COAs, using SMO tools, to allow the commander to
determine which COA provides the best flexibility during execution while minimizing risks.
Analyzing routes over a movement of forces determines which route provides the best options
for the commander.
Step 6: Course of Action Approval—
Allows the unit to submit frequency proposals and receive frequency assignments.
Modifying COAs in accordance with commander’s decision.
Coordinating frequency conflicts through higher echelons for mitigation assistance.
Step 7: Orders Production Dissemination, and Transition—
Producing the SOI and joint communications-electronics operating instructions (JCEOI) and
disseminate as needed to units.
Providing input to Annex H (Signal) of the Operations order (OPORD) that addresses all
signal concerns, to include spectrum use information.
INTELLIGENCE
3-2. The intelligence warfighting function is the related tasks and systems that facilitate understanding of
the enemy, terrain, and civil considerations. It includes tasks associated with information collection. SMO
supports intelligence through the provision of spectrum situational understanding and the ability to gain a
greater understanding of the EMOE. This understanding occurs through the successful frequency
deconfliction of SDD, greater fidelity in threat recognition, and support to the denial and destruction of
adversary counter-intelligence, counter-surveillance, and counter-reconnaissance systems. SMO supports
intelligence through—
Measurement, analysis, and assessment of spectrum situational awareness.
JRFL production and promulgation to protect intelligence operations.
Centralized databases facilitate planning requirements and assessing collection through
subordinate and adjacent units.
FIRES
3-3. The fires warfighting function is the related tasks and systems that provide collective and coordinated
use of Army indirect fires, air and missile defense, and joint fires through the targeting process (ADRP 3-0).
It includes tasks associated with integrating enemy counter mission command activities. SMO provides
crucial support to the fires warfighting function through the ability to discriminate friendly forces from
adversary targets, increased spectrum awareness, and direct support to EW.
3-4. Electromagnetic environmental effects influence the operational capability of military forces,
equipment, systems, and platforms. Spectrum managers support the fires warfighting function by mitigation
of interference and ensuring systems are compatible. Hazards of electromagnetic radiation to personnel
(HERP), hazards of electromagnetic radiation to ordnance (HERO), and hazards of electromagnetic radiation
to fuels (HERF), are examples of electromagnetic environmental effects.
3-5. A hazard of electromagnetic radiation to personnel is the potential hazard that exists when
personnel maybe exposed to a radiation field of sufficient intensity to heat the human body. Radar,
communication systems, and EW systems that use high-power transmitters and high-gain antennas represent
a hazard to personnel working on, or near these systems. Leaders should ensure areas are clearly marked off
to avoid injury to personnel.
3-6. A hazard of electromagnetic radiation to ordnance is the danger of accidental activation of electro-
explosive devices or otherwise electrically activating ordnance because of the radio frequency fields. This
unintended actuation could cause premature firing of ordnance.
3-7. A hazard of electromagnetic radiation to fuels is the potential hazard that exists when volatile
combustibles, such as fuel, exposed to radiation fields of sufficient energy may cause ignition. The hazard is
likely to occur when refueling operations are taking place. Leaders must adhere to proper grounding and
static discharge procedures. Cease or minimize transmissions during refueling operations to prevent the
potential hazard and exposure to radiation fields.
3-8. SMO supports fires through—
Coordination of the EMOE to prevent EMI to firing devices, sensors and data links that use the
spectrum.
Coordination with the CEMA element that allows effective use of spectrum resources and EW.
Integration and synchronization of CEMA by assignment and allocation of spectrum use in joint
environments.
Note. Coordinated execution of joint electromagnetic spectrum operations with other lethal and
nonlethal operations that enable freedom of action in the electromagnetic operational environment
comprises electromagnetic spectrum control. (JP 3-13.1)
SUSTAINMENT
3-9. The sustainment warfighting function is the related tasks and systems that provide support and services
to ensure freedom of action, extend operational reach, and prolong endurance. SMO ensures that all spectrum
dependent activities necessary for sustainment function properly and with minimal interference. Further,
through coordination with EW, SMO contributes to overall sustainment in a hostile EMOE. SMO supports
sustainment through—
Design and development, acquisition, and distribution of advanced tools that manage the spectrum
use.
Protection of sustainment forces from friendly and adversary use of spectrum in static or mobile
environments.
Obtaining frequency clearance for all devices for the duration of the mission.
Frequency deconfliction and emissions control procedures in support of sustainment mission
command.
Provides deconfliction within the spectrum to mitigate negative impacts to aircraft survivability.
MISSION COMMAND
3-10. The mission command warfighting function develops and integrates those activities enabling a
commander to balance the art of command and the science of control. Mission command emphasizes the
centrality of the commander. Commanders exercise mission command through the conduct of the operations
process, knowledge management and information management, synchronize information related capabilities,
and through the conduct of CEMA, which includes SMO. SMO enhances mission command in light of other
spectrum dependent activities (such as jamming and passage of intelligence) through effective spectrum
management. In a contested, congested, and competitive EMOE, the mission command function must remain
effective. SMO plays a key part in planning and battle management process and enables situational awareness
of the EMOE. Spectrum managers are assigned to aviation units to support mission command. Aviation units
require support to flight dispatch elements, and airfield services elements with robust communications
requirements. Figure 3-1 shows the relationship between two SMO tools (described in Chapter 5) that support
mission command. Many SMO tools can be substituted for the two SMO tools depicted in the graphic. These
tools support the commander using the Command Post of the Future.
3-11. SMO supports mission command through—
Planning and preparing the spectrum in response of a mission.
Assessment of the EMOE in response to commander’s intent.
Preparation and maintenance of the EMOE database.
Understanding the impact of a mission on friendly, neutral, adversary, enemy, joint, interagency,
intergovernmental, and multinational entities.
Collecting spectrum information and visualizing this information in quick and easy to understand
formats for completion of the COP.
Control of the spectrum through force tracking and visualization, frequency deconfliction,
reprogramming of SDD, and registration of all spectrum users (such as emitters, sensors, and
receivers) with the spectrum manager.
Development of SMO planning and management tools that support the net-centric environment
(NCE) and become interoperable with Army and joint task force spectrum users.
Figure 3-1. Spectrum situational awareness system and CJSMPT support to mission
command
PROTECTION
3-12. The protection warfighting function is the related tasks and systems that preserve the force so the
commander can apply maximum combat power. SMO supports the protection warfighting function through
the conduct of frequency deconfliction, interference mitigation, and support to EW defensive actions. SMO
supports protection through—
Network and frequency fratricide avoidance, detection, and mitigation.
Development of the JRFL to prevent frequency fratricide and mission degradation.
Coordination with CEMA Element to protect against blue force EMI during EW operations, such
as counter radio-controlled improvised explosive device EW use.
4-4. Table 4-2 shows a sample of the products of the JFMO and includes the agency and action taken.
Legend
EMI electromagnetic interference
JCEOI joint communications-electronics operating instructions
JFMO joint frequency management office
JRFL joint restricted frequency list
JSIR joint spectrum interference resolution
JSME joint spectrum management element
JTF joint task force
Note. Collaboration and coordination with varying agencies, especially host nations, occurs
through a variety of processes. These processes are generally very formal and setup through the
fostering of mutual trust and rapport between the JFMO and host nation. The spectrum manager
must keep in mind customs and cultures, tact and courtesy, and the concerns of other agencies
while still attempting to obtain the amount of spectrum resources necessary for the mission. The
spectrum manager must also maintain accurate records of all dialogue and agreements made with
the host nation.
4-9. Table 4-4 shows some of the products produced by or for the JSME. These products include the data
call message, JCEOI, and the spectrum plan.
Table 4-4. Products of the JSME
4-10. Figure 4-4 shows the spectrum manager input to the JSME.
State’s spectrum managers for domestic operations. The NG J-6 spectrum management branch provides
coordination between the State’s spectrum managers and all federal agencies. NG J-6 authorizes state
spectrum managers direct liaison with the Army frequency management office or the Army spectrum
management office. Joint forces headquarters state spectrum managers form a JSME in support of operational
task forces under state active duty, dual status (Title 32 or Title 10) domestic operations.
4-14. Activated forces, after acquiring frequency assignments may operate both civil and military systems
within a domestic area of operations to achieve interoperability with other Federal agencies and civil
authorities. NG forces may request frequency assignments through the NG, or through Title 10 military
channels depending on their duty status for a given operation. The National Telecommunications and
Information Administration control the spectrum within the homeland. They certify and license civilian usage
of the electromagnetic spectrum. NG forces and U.S. Coast Guard may operate both civil and military
systems within a domestic area of operations, as well as numerous states, local and federal agencies.
4-15. After receiving orders to conduct movement for a domestic operation, each operational element
initially contacts their local state spectrum manager or JSME for a JCEOI extract detailing the frequencies
and procedures to use for communications. The local spectrum manager or the JSME submit a standard
frequency action format (SFAF) request for frequencies on behalf of the end user. A state’s qualified
spectrum manager provides spectrum management for a given geographical state to the greatest extent
possible. Spectrum managers coordinate for interstate operations, and for spectrum deconfliction for
operations adjacent to another spectrum manager’s area of responsibility. Local spectrum managers form the
JSME and work directly for the incident commander (or the local state joint force headquarters prior to the
appointment of an incident commander).
4-16. Domestic operations lessons learned have demonstrated that both unity of effort and coordinated
spectrum management are critical to the success of the operation. Congress and the DOD, through the
implementation of a dual status commander (commander of both Title 32 NG forces, and Title 10 NG and
active Army forces for a domestic operation) have addressed unity of effort. Unity of command is not
applicable between Federal military forces and the state NG, but unity of effort can be achieved if the
President and the Governor formally agree to appoint a dual-status commander. Federal authorities have been
established that allow a designated dual-status commander to serve in a hybrid Federal and state status. A
dual-status commander will usually be a National Guard officer who is given simultaneous but separate
authorities over Federal and state military forces. Spectrum management for a domestic operation requires
consolidation under one JSME, (or at a minimum coordinated Title 10 and Title 32 JSMEs led by the same
commander) to minimize confusion and provide seamless support to tactical communications.
4-17. The JSME initially assigned to an incident continues to work for the incident commander as the
operation transitions to a different duty status or legal authority, to ensure continuity of spectrum
management. Typically, a state Governor or Adjutant General creates a standing joint task force including a
JSME, or establish a joint task force with a JSME in response to an incident. Optionally, each state builds its
JSME from qualified spectrum managers, and equipment from within the state National Guard’s tables of
distribution and allowance allotment. Should a state not have qualified spectrum managers, the Adjutant
General and Governor may request qualified spectrum managers prepare to deploy from other states to form
a JSME under a formalized emergency management assistance compact. The JSME may request a spectrum
flyaway team from the NG bureau J-6 and USNORTHCOM to supplement the element.
4-18. Figure 4-5, provides a graphic of the collaboration process during domestic operations.
Note. See JP 3-28 and JP 6-01 for more information regarding domestic operations.
TOOL CONSIDERATIONS
5-1. There are a variety of spectrum related tools used to plan and manage communications networks and
SDDs. Many of these tools do specific functions of limited scope precluding the sharing of relevant
information among these functions creating inefficiencies. This can lead to erroneous planning and
assignments that can cause frequency interference. It is essential for the benefit of all spectrum stakeholders,
tools should share data in a consistent manner to improve efficiencies. As an example, EW operators should
use the same tool that the spectrum manager uses in order to allow the spectrum manager to mitigate harmful
interference to friendly systems possibly caused by EW systems.
5-2. Gathering and managing spectrum data requires considerable time in order to ensure accuracy. Tools
that support the automation of spectrum management functions can drastically reduce this time constraint.
Tools that promote the flow of information between spectrum stakeholders reduce the planning cycle leading
to quicker decisions. Spectrum managers are able to perform the core SMO functions much more efficiently
when tools comply with the net-centric environment.
5-3. The NCE, a common shared virtual space used within and among differing authenticated units and
organizations, has facilitated numerous advantages for spectrum managers of all levels. Central access to
multiple databases reduces or eliminates the need to visit agencies to obtain a list of devices used in the area
of operations. Having central databases requires SMO tools to have interoperable and compatible formats in
order to function. The net-centric environment is very effective in joint task force operations.
5-4. There exist many data file standards regarding frequency proposals. Standard Frequency Action
Format (SFAF) is a line oriented text format used by DOD, and by U.S. allies and unified action partners
who use Spectrum XXI. SFAF is the standard format for frequency proposals, assignments, modifications,
renewals, reviews, and deletions.
Note. An upgrade to the HE-300 antenna is available that includes a built in global positioning
system location device and electronic compass. This capability, in conjunction with an available
software update for the PR100, allows for rudimentary direction finding of signals and
triangulation between multiple S2AS users and measurements. The S2AS provides direction-
finding antenna and triangulation capability intended for post, camp, or forward operation base
locations. System use of S2AS is for a relatively small area. This upgrade also eliminates the need
for a unit provided global positioning system receiver.
5-13. S2AS visually differentiates signals that are not in any planned database so that the spectrum manager
can further investigate the source of the signal. Figure 5-3 shows the functional relationship between the
S2AS key capabilities. The figure provides a graphical depiction of the sense characteristic. Sensing and
monitoring frequencies that are available to the user is an initial operational function of the S2AS. The system
then analyzes the information captured and shares the data with the listed database.
list of known SDD worldwide. CJSMPT functions in a standalone environment to operate while not
connected to the SIPRNET.
5-29. AESOP periodic updates have improved the performance of communications networks in the presence
of counter radio-controlled improvised explosive device electronic warfare and other EW. The AESOP
master database is shore based and is only available via connection to the SIPRNET. For users with no access
to SIPRNET or having limited bandwidth, AESOP is available in a standalone mode with a local database.
5-30. AESOP is compliant with the SFAF and SSRF. Measurements taken by AESOP provide input and
development of the DD Form 1494. AESOP provides spectrum visualization after analysis of spectrum use.
AESOP can import and export XML files. The system can provide the Navy’s input to the JRFL during joint
task force operations. Army spectrum managers may interface with AESOP when coordinating spectrum use
in operational areas collocated with Navy missions.
SPECTRUM XXI
5-31. Commanders have several configuration options within Spectrum XXI. Spectrum XXI is a client and
server, Windows-based software system that provides spectrum managers with a single information system
that addresses spectrum management automation requirements. The JSC manages Spectrum XXI. Spectrum
XXI supports operational planning as well as near instantaneous management of the electromagnetic
spectrum with an emphasis on assigning compatible frequencies and performing spectrum-engineering tasks.
Spectrum XXI client version is a software package that requires a unit funded computer.
5-32. The joint spectrum center central repository for Spectrum XXI provides the DOD with a central
database that contains spectrum certification for compliant systems, topography and electromagnetic
environmental effects data, and all DOD spectrum proposals and assignments. The repository also serves as
the mechanism to transfer data between the DOD and NTIA for permanent frequency assignments in the U.S.
and its possessions. Spectrum XXI users may access the government master file through the central repository
as needed.
5-33. Spectrum XXI users can connect to one of the three regional servers through local area network access,
SIPRNET access, or secure telephone for dial-up access. The Spectrum XXI database uses the Oracle
database management system based on structured query language that requires licenses and training for the
regional servers. The client version that Army spectrum managers use does not require an Oracle license or
training. The client can function in standalone mode using the local database with limited functionality when
network connectivity is unavailable. Spectrum XXI contains a table of International Telecommunications
Union allocations by region to aid the spectrum manager in international spectrum planning compliance. The
Spectrum XXI database also contains geographical boundaries and utilities. The system can plot SDD based
on frequency records.
5-34. Spectrum XXI allows the user to create and maintain permanent, temporary, proposed assignments,
including background on frequency assignments. Spectrum XXI analyzes frequency assignments for
operating conditions, interference, intermodulation, allocation and allotment tables, and compliance with
technical and administration standards. A simulated spectrum analyzer provides a display of current spectrum
occupancy and projected spectrum use at user-defined sites.
5-35. Spectrum XXI allows for the creation of the JSIR to aid in the mitigation of EMI. The system also
creates and manages input to the JRFL. Spectrum XXI can analyze the impact of EW on spectrum users.
Spectrum XXI is compliant with the SFAF as outlined in the MCEB Publication 7 format.
5-47. The Data Exchange Module electronically exchanges data between servers and client computers. The
Data Exchange Module manages the server accounts, job accounts, and domains used for data exchanges. A
stand-alone client (not network connected) cannot use the functions of Data Exchange. When first installed,
Spectrum XXI is a stand-alone client until the initial connection to a server. When connected it becomes a
data-exchanging client.
Note. Host nation allocation tables and SDD certification does not constitute the authorization to
assign frequencies within the host nation. Send all formal frequency requests to the host nation to
obtain frequency authorization. See JP 6-01 for more information on host nation coordination.
SOI Module
5-56. The SOI module contains call signs, call words, frequency assignments, signs and countersigns. The
SOI module also contains pyrotechnic and smoke signals, dictionaries, groups, quick reference, and title
pages. Generation of pyrotechnics and smoke signal components may be separate or randomly selected. SOI
also provides the capability to create the Master Call Sign packets, as well as separate extract packets, while
maintaining a database link to nets in the master net list.
ARC–220 Module
5-58. The ARC–220 module allows platforms and equipment assignment to ARC–220 nets. ARC-220 is a
radio network that supports long-range communications between military aircraft and ground stations. This
network type provides support for the AN/ARC-220 (aircraft version) and AN/VRC-100 (ground version)
radios. These radios operate in three different modes: single channel (Basic Preset or Manual), automatic link
establishment, and electronic counter-counter measure. The net validate function ensures that the platforms
intended to communicate with each other can in fact do so with the equipment they have been allocated. The
net generated function automatically creates COMSEC key tag assignments to secure the network.
Spectrum Certification System (known as SCS) Database is the central archive repository for
all DOD spectrum certification system data, including information from the joint force 12 (known
as the J/F-12), Application for Equipment Frequency Allocation. J/F-12 is the unique tracking
number assigned by the Army Spectrum Management Office.
Background Environmental Information (known as BEI) Database: To accurately represent
the electromagnetic environment, the Defense Spectrum Organization collects additional non-U.S.
Federal and international frequency assignments, which are stored in the BEI database. The BEI
currently includes International Telecommunication Union, Federal Communications
Commission, Canadian, and Radio Astronomy assignments.
Government Master File (known as GMF) Database: The GMF is a data source containing
records of the frequency assigned to all U.S. Federal Government agencies in the U.S. and its
possessions. Data is obtained from NTIA.
Frequency Resource Record System (known as FRRS) Database: FRRS contains information
on DOD frequency assignments used throughout the world that is controlled by the Commanders
of the Unified Commands and the Military Departments.
Electronic Order of Battle (known as EOB) database: The JSDR contains nearly 25,000
Defense Intelligence Agency EOB foreign equipment locations.
TASKS
A-1. Tasks assigned or associated with spectrum management are based on unit specificity. Spectrum
management encompasses a wide range of military activities and missions. Each unit will have standard
operating procedures to enable spectrum management operations.
A-2. Each unit provides the spectrum manager with a unique set of circumstances. As an example,
assignments to Aviation units differ from Special Operations units in the deployment and use of SDD and
related systems.
PLAN THE USE OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM FOR ALL SPECTRUM DEPENDENT
DEVICES
A-3. Planning for spectrum use requires information from a variety of sources. The spectrum manager uses
force structure templates to plan missions. Forces submit spectrum requirements for all devices used for the
mission to the spectrum manager. The spectrum manager submits frequency proposals to appropriate
agencies in the correct format (SFAF or SSRF). Frequency record creation in the appropriate database
prevents other units from requesting the same spectrum resources. Supporting sub-tasks for plan the use of
the electromagnetic spectrum for all spectrum dependent devices include—
Conduct a data call.
Generate frequency proposal.
Process frequency proposal from subordinate units.
Analyze spectrum resource allocations and partition them into allotment plans and assignments.
Nominate assignments against allotments (spectrum resources).
Create and edit a frequency record.
Provide input to the production of Annex H (OPORD).
The following sub-tasks support the task conduct electromagnetic interference analysis—
Identify EMI.
Provide recommendation to eliminate and or mitigate interference.
Prevent frequency substitution by locking nets, and assignments.
Provide recommended frequency modification or substitution by user assigned priority.
Import and validate JSIR input from subordinates.
Export JSIR to higher headquarters.
Note. The JSC serves as the center for EMI mitigation and monitors the JSIRO collaboration
portal. JSIRO is accessible through the SIPRNET link provided in the reference portion of CJCSM
3320.02D. JSIRO is currently the preferred method of reporting EMI occurrences.
PERFORM MODELING AND SIMULATION OF THE EMOE VIA USER SELECTED DATA FIELDS
OF THE IMPACT OF THE EMOE ON PROJECTED SPECTRUM PLANS
A-8. Modeling and simulation of the EMOE using SMO tools allow for mitigating the effects of SDD on
unintended bystanders. It also allows for development of various COAs during the MDMP upon receipt of
an OPORD or fragmentary order. It is critical for the spectrum manager to monitor the spectrum continually
in order to detect EMI or EW during mission performance. The following sub-tasks support this task—
Conduct data call.
Maintain situational awareness of the EMOE.
Derive specific mission requirements from the operation plan (OPLAN) or OPORD.
Conduct analysis.
Note. The satellite access authorization authorizes frequencies for use on satellite systems. The
satellite access authorization does not provide area frequency clearance in the operational area.
Spectrum managers must obtain frequency clearance from the host nation using guidelines for the
respective geographic commander prior to allowing units to transmit on the assigned uplink
frequency. Deconflict these frequencies from other ground-based emitters to prevent interference
during mission execution.
CREATE, IMPORT, EXPORT, EDIT, DELETE, DISPLAY, AND DISTRIBUTE THE JOINT
RESTRICTED FREQUENCY LIST
A-14. The JRFL is a management tool used by various operational, intelligence, and support elements to
identify the level of protection desired for a critical function utilized within the electromagnetic spectrum.
EW planners utilize the JRFL to conduct mission planning and to mitigate the effects of friendly offensive
and defense electronic attack when possible. The JRFL does not provide protection from other spectrum
users. Planners limit JRFL entries to the minimum number of radio frequencies and intelligence equities
necessary for friendly forces to accomplish mission objectives. The JRFL entry contains at a minimum—
Tactical/operational point of contact for frequency usage.
Center channel of the frequency assignment.
Emission designator.
Name of receiver location.
Geolocation of receiver.
Protection radius of receiver.
Justification for protection.
JRFL code (protected, taboo, guarded).
Serial number of Spectrum XXI frequency record for transmitters only. Receivers or sensors do
not have a record.
A-15. The spectrum manager receives requests from subordinate units to place friendly force spectrum users
into the JRFL. Spectrum managers validate organizational and subordinate JRFL requests and forward them
to higher echelons for approval. The command with responsibility for developing and promulgating the JRFL
validates subordinate unit input. Upon completion of the JRFL, the spectrum manager disseminates the JRFL
to subordinate users. This task is supported by the following sub-tasks—
Gather and compile JRFL input.
Validate JRFL input (codes: taboo, guarded, and protected).
Export JRFL input to higher headquarters.
Import completed JRFL from higher headquarters.
Export completed JRFL to subordinates.
SUB-TASK LIST
A-18. The following list provides a description of the sub-tasks as they pertain to the functions of the Army
spectrum manager—
Conduct Data Call: The spectrum requirements data call message provides guidance to staff
elements, components, and supporting agencies on how to request spectrum support for SDD
systems that operate under their control within the area of operations. This multipart message
should cover the following subjects—
Spectrum management policy and guidance.
Security classification guidance.
Frequency and communications-electronic operating instructions.
Master net list request procedures.
Guidance for identifying nets and frequencies to be included on the JRFL.
Note. For a sample of the data call format, see CJCSM 3320.01C, Annex A, appendix A, enclosure
C.
Process frequency proposals from subordinate units: The spectrum manager receives
frequency requests from subordinate units in the format described in the data call message. This
allows the spectrum manager to place the required information into the planning software and
analyze the impact of the request on the spectrum. Also of concern is receipt of agency approval,
host nation supportability operations using host nation comments, receiving and updating
spectrum related databases, and input from the area frequency coordinator. Once the spectrum
requirements exist within databases, the spectrum manager determines spectrum supportability of
the request.
Generate frequency proposal: Once the frequency proposal processing is complete, the spectrum
manager submits the proposal in the correct format (SFAF or SSRF) to obtain frequency
assignment. Use of SMO tools allows the manager to accurately generate and submit frequency
proposals to the appropriate agencies.
Analyze spectrum resource allocations and partition them into allotment plans and
assignments: spectrum managers receive a range of frequency allocations in a given area for SDD.
The spectrum manager can use SMO tools to analyze force spectrum requirements and submit
frequency proposals based on the analysis.
Nominate assignments against allotments (spectrum resources): If provided allotments for use
within given bands of the spectrum, the spectrum manager assigns frequencies to spectrum users.
The SMO tool in use during the planning process, determines possible frequency assignments and
if they are supportable.
Create and edit a frequency record: A frequency record includes all information pertaining to
spectrum use of a specific unit or force (blue, red, or grey). Frequency records include
characteristics, capabilities, frequency proposal and assignment, frequency clearance, and the
force structure supporting the frequency use. Frequency records consolidation occurs during the
normal procedures for obtaining frequency assignment with SMO tools. Location of the frequency
records are in various databases.
Provide input to the production of Annex H (OPORD): Annex H of the OPORD concerns
signals. The spectrum manager places key spectrum information in Annex H of the OPORD. This
allows the commander and subordinate units to have a clear picture of the operational
environment.
Identify EMI: EMI can present itself in various ways. For instance, a communications terminal
may contact the brigade or battalion headquarters concerning difficulty receiving a signal from
another communications terminal. The primary tool used to identify immediate EMI is S2AS. The
S2AS can scan the specific frequency range that the terminal is operating within for jamming,
intermodulation, and noise, and eventually locate (through direction finding) and assist the
spectrum manager in determining the cause of the EMI (frequency fratricide or enemy EW).
Provide recommendation to eliminate and or mitigate interference: The SMO tools in use can
perform mitigation or frequency deconflictionError! Bookmark not defined. of EMI
occurrences. Recommendations provided to the commander from the spectrum manager enhance
decision-making. The commander may decide to continue with limited spectrum use or obtain
frequency reassignment.
Prevent frequency substitution by locking nets and assignments: Based on mission priority
and commander’s discretion, the JRFLError! Bookmark not defined. lists frequencies and
networks that require protection from friendly force spectrum users. A variety of SMO tools allow
for automatically locking nets and assignments during the mission planning process.
Provide recommended frequency modification or substitution by user: Frequency
modification or substitution occurs to obtain new frequencies for users that experience unresolved
EMI. The commander may deem frequency modification necessary based on user priority during
EW operations.
Conduct analysis: The spectrum manager conducts analysis when using SMO tools to plan
spectrum use. Tools determine the impact of spectrum use in the operational area by calculated
EMI, spectrum requirements, and force structure. The analysis results determine if the spectrum
can support a given COAError! Bookmark not defined..
Export Spectrum Plan in a format compatible for import by mission command systems: The
SMO tools currently in use are capable of exporting the correct format for use by various command
systems. The spectrum manager verifies accuracy and completeness of the spectrum plan prior to
exporting it in the correct format to various mission command systems.
Provide spectrum situational awareness to the COP: This occurs during mission performance
by using spectrum analyzers or receivers. The spectrum manager can use these tools while
stationary to detect unknown or unplanned signals. Mobile packages or antennas allow for
direction finding and locating these signals to determine spectrum COA analysis.
Identify conflicts: Spectrum awareness identifies when spectrum conflicts occur. These conflicts
may be blue, grey, or red forces. Use the JSIRError! Bookmark not defined. procedures and
spectrum awareness tools to locate, characterize, and determine critical information concerning
the signal(s) in question.
Perform spectrum COA analysis: Differing SMO tools develop COAs during the planning
phase of a mission. This allows the commander to choose the best COA. During mission
execution, EMI occurrence requires the development of COAs. The nature of the EMI (blue, red
or grey force caused EMI) determines the development of COAs. The spectrum manager may
possibly require new frequencies for users. Another COA, based on the impact of the EMI and
mission priority, may be simply to do nothing. The JSIR procedures include directions and
reporting procedures to mitigate EMI.
Modify Satellite Access Authorization records to ensure required data fields comply with
the MCEBError! Bookmark not defined. standard for assignment: Spectrum users that
depend on satelliteError! Bookmark not defined. resources require a satellite access
authorization from the regional satellite communications support center responsible for the
location of the user. The regional satellite communications support center disseminates satellite
Note. The regional satelliteError! Bookmark not defined. communications support center
generally interfaces with brigade satellite operations. In some cases, the brigade spectrum manager
is also the satellite operations NCO.
Import and validate JSIRError! Bookmark not defined. input from subordinates: Report
EMI at the lowest level recognized. The spectrum manager attempts to mitigate the EMI at the
lowest level possible using the JSIR procedures (CJCSM 3320.02D). If that level cannot rectify
the situation, it escalates to the next higher level until EMI resolution. Spectrum users and
managers of all levels report EMI occurrences to the next higher echelon, regardless of severity
or cause. SMO tools allow the spectrum manager to import a JSIR report and determine the
validity of the information. If SIPRNET access is available, use the JSIRO collaboration portal
for EMI reporting.
Export JSIR to higher headquarters: Once imported and validated the next higher headquarters
takes action. If SIPRNET access is available, use the JSIRO collaboration portal for EMI
reporting. If not, various SMO tools allow for exporting the JSIR to higher headquarters.
Derive specific mission requirements from OPLAN or OPORD: The OPLAN or OPORD
contains a variety of information that spectrum managers may use to perform key tasks, such as
generating the SOI or performing a data call.
Maintain Spectrum Analysis of the EMOE: This task is an ongoing task for the duration of a
mission. Ideally, the spectrum manager performs live spectrum analysis even before the mission
becomes active to determine whether the planned frequencies have interferenceError! Bookmark
not defined. once active. Live spectrum monitoring plays a critical role in identifying, analyzing,
and mitigating EMI.
Conduct EMOE information data exchange with peer-to-peer, subordinate to higher and
higher to subordinate users: Spectrum managers update a variety of databases, especially in a
joint environment, to remain effective in spectrum use. SMO tools currently in use allow for easy
data exchange through common formats and central databases.
Delete, modify, and export user selected background data: User selected background data
involves obtaining detailed SDD data and characteristics. Background data characteristics are
located in spectrum related databases. The spectrum manager must update the selected background
data periodically to ensure that the databases reflect accurate information.
Build and test base SOI or JCEOIError! Bookmark not defined.: The spectrum manager uses
SMO tools to develop the SOI or JCEOI based on mission requirements and commander’s intent.
The SOI or JCEOI gives the spectrum user guidelines for operating within the spectrum and
instructions for reporting spectrum issues.
Determine if spectrum dependent device is supportable: Completion of the DD Form
1494Error! Bookmark not defined. is critical in determining the area of interest supportability.
Also of use are the various spectrumError! Bookmark not defined. databases, such as Spectrum
XXIError! Bookmark not defined., CJSMPT’s spectrum knowledge repositoryError!
Bookmark not defined., and HNSWDO.
Note. The user of the SDD is responsible for DD Form 1494Error! Bookmark not defined.
processing and completion.
File data in accordance with regulatory records: Data compliance with SFAF orError!
Bookmark not defined. SSRF, Federal Communications Commission, NTIA, International
Telecommunications Union, and host nationError! Bookmark not defined. formatting to file
data correctly. Use of various SMO tools automates the process of formatting during the frequency
acquisition process.
Gather and compile JRFLError! Bookmark not defined. input: Depending on mission priority
and commander’s discretion, some (but not all) spectrum users may be on the JRFL protected list.
Validate JRFL input (codes: taboo, guarded, and protected): Many users request placement
on the JRFL. However, JRFL code selection requires validation of mission priority and
commander’s discretion.
Export JRFL input to higher headquarters: Once the JRFL validation is complete, the
spectrum manager exports it to higher headquarters to place the user’s SDD on the central JRFL.
SMO tools allow the user to export JRFL information in the correct format.
Import completed JRFL from higher headquarters: The higher headquarters completes and
compiles the JRFL based on subordinate unit’s inputs. The spectrum manager then imports the
JRFL from the higher echelon and prepares to disseminate it to subordinate units.
Export completed JRFL to subordinates: The spectrum manager disseminates the approved
JRFL to subordinate units to place the JRFL into effect. Various SMO tools allow for the easy
distribution of the completed JRFL.
Coordinate for spectrum usage with host nation (HNSWDO): When operating outside the U.S.
and its possessions, it is critical to coordinate spectrum use within the area of operations with the
host nations. Use of the spectrum within a host nation without authorization from that nation
causes international consequences, such as fines, imprisonment, or loss of life. HNSWDO is the
primary means for the spectrum manager to determine host nation spectrum supportability for
SDD.
Perform person-to-person host nation coordination: When delegated under combatant
command authority the Joint Task Force J6 JSME may be required to conduct host nation
coordination in support of Joint Task Force spectrum access within the joint operational area.
Distribute JRFL electronically or by printed text: The spectrum manager disseminates the
completed JRFL to the units that require it. SMO tools currently in use allow for easily
disseminating the JRFL to required agencies electronically or by printed text.
A-20. Figure A-2 shows a detailed description of the SMO tasks that support the collaboration process.
A-22. Receive Frequency Request: As the units answer the message, the spectrum manager receives
frequency requests in accordance with mandatory formats (SFAF, SSRF, NTIA or International
Telecommunications Union required items). Spectrum managers review the spectrum dependent device
characteristics and determine if each has passed the spectrum certification process (DD Form 1494), and is
supportable in the operational area by reviewing host nation comments (HNSWDO). The spectrum manager
validates frequency requests by checking for inflated requests (such as the unit requests more frequency than
needed). The spectrum manager validates JRFL requests with the G-2 and G-3; this ensures warranted
protection requests. The spectrum manager also prioritizes spectrum users, with the G-3, to aid in planning
and prioritizing frequency requests.
A-23. Develop COA: Spectrum managers develop COAs for the mission and issue initial frequency
assignments to perform modeling and simulation for the spectrum. Various SMO tools identify EMI caused
by various sources and provide deconfliction recommendations. Spectrum managers also perform a spectrum
risk assessment to determine the effects of the SDD in the area of responsibility. The commander may choose
the COA according to all of the identified spectrum issues and risks.
A-24. Generate frequency assignments: The spectrum manager receives spectrum resources, in the
form of allocation tables and permissions, from higher echelon (such as Army Spectrum Management Office,
JFMO, and host nation coordination). The spectrum manager uses SMO tools to transfer the information into
SFAF or SSRF format and place it into spectrum use databases.
A-25. Spectrum managers assign frequency and nominate frequency proposals to the approving authority
using SMO tools. Upon receiving approved frequency assignments, the spectrum manager determines
spectrum supportability of any new or revised frequencies. Spectrum managers receive counter radio-
controlled improvised explosive device EW loadsets and electronic attack request format frequencies from
the EW Cell. The spectrum manager performs deconfliction to mitigate EMI caused by EW efforts.
A-26. Distribute Tactical Spectrum Plan: The spectrum manager disseminates the plan to all required
agencies (JFMO, JSME, and CEMA element) and provides spectrum data to communities of interest such as
unified action partners. The spectrum manager generates and distributes combat network radio loadsets. The
spectrum manager disseminates approved policies for spectrum use, to include the SOI or JCEOI Annex H
(OPORD), the completed JRFL, and EMI resolution guidance (CJCSM 3320.02D).
A-27. Update Spectrum Databases: The spectrum manager updates various spectrum related databases
HNSWDO, Spectrum XXI.
A-28. Conduct Mission: Spectrum managers conduct spectrum monitoring prior to conducting the mission
to validate spectrum databases and identify differences between planned authorized frequencies and spurious
or unauthorized frequencies in use. Spectrum managers use spectrum analyzers and spectrum analysis
software to monitor frequencies. Spurious and unauthorized frequencies may be found through direction
finding and triangulation. Spectrum monitoring during the mission identifies and characterizes EMI
occurrences. Upon EMI occurrence, the spectrum manager performs EMI resolution mitigation and reporting
procedures. The spectrum manager uses the characterized data to submit a JSIR report. The spectrum
manager then follows the steps in the CJCSM 3320.02D, to attempt to resolve and mitigate the EMI at the
lowest echelon possible. If resolution is not possible, the spectrum manager provides spectrum users with
new frequency assignments.
A-29. Figure A-3 provides a graphic depiction of EW Cell tasks that support the SMO collaboration process.
A-34. Figure A-4 shows the collaboration between the spectrum manager, the G-6, and the G-3.
CJSMPT X X X X X X
S2AS X X X
AESOP X X X
SPEED X X X X
ACES/
X X X X
JACS
HNSWDO X X X X X
Legend: X = formatting compatible * = limited format compatibility blank = not currently compatible
ACES automated communications engineering software
AESOP Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program
CJSMPT Coalition Joint Spectrum Management Planning Tool
HNSWDO Host Nation Spectrum Worldwide Database Online
JACS joint automated communications-electronics operation instructions system
S2AS Spectrum Situational Awareness System
SPEED systems planning, engineering, and evaluation device
SSRF Format X * X X
Legend: X = formatting compatible * = limited format compatibility blank = not currently compatible
SMO - spectrum management EW - electronic warfare S2AS - Spectrum Situational
operations HN - host nation Awareness System
ACES - automated communications HNSWDO - Host Nation Spectrum SFAF - standard frequency action
engineering software Worldwide Database Online format
AESOP - Afloat Electromagnetic HTML - hypertext markup language SOI - signal operating instructions
Spectrum Operations Program JACS - joint automated communications- SPEED - systems planning,
CJSMPT - Coalition Joint Spectrum electronics operation instructions system engineering, and evaluation
Management Planning Tool JCEOI - joint communications-electronics device
COA - course of action operating instructions SSRF - standard spectrum
COP - common operational picture JRFL- joint restricted frequency list resource format
CSV - comma separated values JSIR - joint spectrum interference resolution XML - extensible markup
EMI - electromagnetic interference NCE - network-centric environment language
EMOE - electromagnetic operational
environment
RADIO FREQUENCY
C-1. RF communications, based on the laws of physics, describes the behavior of electromagnetic energy
waves. RF communication works by creating electromagnetic waves at a source and being able to receive
those electromagnetic waves at a particular destination. These electromagnetic waves travel through the air
at the speed of light. The wavelength of an electromagnetic signal is inversely proportional to the frequency;
the higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength.
C-2. Frequency measurements are in Hz (cycles per second) and radio frequency measurements are in kHz
(thousands of cycles per second), MHz (or millions of cycles per second) and GHz (or billions of cycles per
second). The wavelength for a device utilizing a frequency in the MHz range is longer than frequency in a
GHz range. In general, signals with longer wavelengths travel a greater distance and penetrate through, and
around objects better than signals with shorter wavelengths.
C-3. Waveforms are patterns of electrical energy over time. A Sine wave is the fundamental building block
of electricity and other energies. A Sine wave mathematically defines a natural action describing a harmonic
alternating event.
C-4. Figure C-1 provides a graphic depiction of a simple waveform. Displacement is the crest (high point)
and trough (low point) of a wave. The wavelength is the distance from one crest to another or trough to
another. Amplitude is the height of a crest or trough.
within the length of the wave. Since each loop is equivalent to one-half a wavelength, the length of the wave
is equal to three-halves of a wavelength. The table has a pattern when inspecting standing wave patterns and
the length-wavelength relationships for the first three harmonics. The number of antinodes in the pattern is
equal to the harmonic number of that pattern. The first harmonic has one antinode; the second harmonic
has two antinodes; and the third harmonic has three antinodes. The mathematical relationship simply emerges
from the pattern and the understanding that each loop in the pattern is equivalent to one-half of a wavelength.
The general equation that describes this length-wavelength relationship for any harmonic is on the right side
column of Figure C-2.
manager is the focal point for inclusion of spectrum use considerations in the Annex H development and
provides administrative and technical support for military spectrum use. This process uses the spectrum
management concept, developed in the first activity, along with existing policy and guidance. Other sources
of information are lessons learned from previous operations and exercises, the JSC and other spectrum
managers.
D-14. The spectrum manager devises a plan to use spectrum resources available. This plan depends upon the
products of all the previous activities. Spectrum managers evaluate spectrum management plans for possible
improvement on a regular basis. The spectrum management plan is typically included as an appendix to
Annex H of an OPLAN or OPORD and evolves from guidance as the operation or exercise transitions from
the planning to execution phase.
D-15. The spectrum management plan provides guidance for all spectrum management functions, including
information exchange, expected coordination channels, format for deliverable products, interference and
reporting resolution procedures, and suggested resolution steps.
D-20. Information found in the JCEOI includes document-handling instructions, controlling authority data,
effective dates and reproduction instructions. Due to the sensitive information contained in the JCEOI,
classification should be at the same level. When jointly used, the Army CEOI becomes the Joint CEOI or
JCEOI.
Note. The JCEOI is the most widely used communication control document in any given
operational area.
D-21. Overarching regulatory guidance for JCEOI management, to include call signs and call words, is
contained within the CJCSM 3320.02, JCEOI publication. Additional guidance may apply based on
command relationships with other unified action partners.
D-22. During operations, the combatant commander is the authority for the JCEOI. The combatant
commander may delegate this authority, to the ground component commander or the respective joint task
force commander. There is a distinction between the air and ground component JCEOI. The relevant air
component issues a Special Instructions document that is the air operations equivalent of the JCEOI.
D-23. Within garrison, the Army Command, Army Service component command, or direct reporting unit
commander has responsibility for CEOI production and distribution in support of training requirements. U.S.
Forces Command may delegate authority to a corps, division or remain centralized to meet installation-
training objectives. Regardless of echelon, the commander is responsible for the JCEOI. The J-6 or G-6
develops and promulgates the JCEOI. The J-3 or G-3 validates master net list requirements and resolves
conflicts.
D-27. Table D-1 provides an explanation of call sign, call word, suffix and expander.
Table D-1. Call signs, call words, suffix and expander
Item Example Explanation
Name
X6Y24E The term “call sign” refers to the letter-number-letter combination that typically
B9K60H designates a unit element in the CEOI or JCEOI. CJCSI 3320.03A specifies that
the call sign should remain daily, changing in the event that the ability to
Call Sign communicate securely is lost.
Examples:
X6Y= 1/A/1-25 INF (1st Platoon, A Co., 1-25 INF Bn)
Bulldog24E Pronounceable words that identify a communications facility, command,
Fury60H authority, activity or unit; serves the same functionality as the call sign. The
Army does not have set call words per unit.
Call Word Call word deconfliction is typically handled by the highest level spectrum
manager.
EXAMPLES:
Bulldog = 1/a/1-25 INF (1st Platoon, A Co., 1-125 INF Bn)
X6Y24E The term “suffix” refers to the two digits assigned to a particular position,
B9K60H mission or function within a unit or element.
Suffix Bulldog24E EXAMPLES:
Fury60H 24 = AVN Officer/NCO
60 = G-6 or S-6
X6Y24E A single letter code (A through Z) used in conjunction with a suffix and call sign
B9K60H to identify a sub-element of the position, mission, or function.
Expander Bulldog24E EXAMPLES:
Fury60H E = NCOIC
H = Officer in charge
Legend
ACES automated communications engineering software
AVN aviation
Bn battalion
CEOI communications-electronics operating instruction
CJCSI Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction
Co company
INF infantry
JACS joint automated communications-electronics operation instructions system
JANAP joint Army, Navy, Air Force publication
JCEOI joint communications-electronics operating instructions
NCO noncommissioned officer
NCOIC noncommissioned officer in charge
SOI signal operating instructions
Security Classification
D-28. The content of the JCEOI, master net list, and communications card extracts determine the
classification levels. The level of COMSEC key tag information entered into the system for ACES terminal
and corresponding generated loadsets determine the classification. Similar to a classified presentation, the
overall classification of a specific product would be the highest level of classification it contains.
accomplished by the spectrum manager. Creation of the JRFL is for the CEMA element and based on
guidance established by the commander, EWO and the CEMA working group.
D-31. Leaders should become familiar with the types of protection status codes that exist for the JRFL.
Knowing these status codes allows the EWO to plan jamming operations on the unrestricted frequencies for
training and during operations. Three types of protection status codes apply to frequency assets identified for
inclusion in a JRFL. Sample JRFL restriction status codes include—
Taboo frequencies: Taboo frequencies are any friendly frequencies of such importance that they
must never be deliberately jammed, interfered with by friendly forces. Normally, these include
international distress, safety, stop buzzer, and controller frequencies. These frequencies include
international distress, safety, and controller frequencies. They are generally long-standing as well
as time-oriented. (JP 3-13.1)
Protected frequencies: Those friendly frequencies used for a particular operation, identified and
protected to prevent them from inadvertent jamming by friendly forces while engaged in active
EW operations against hostile forces. These frequencies are of such critical importance that
jamming should be restricted unless necessary or until coordination with the using unit is made.
These frequencies are generally time-oriented, may change with the tactical situation, and updated
periodically. Protected frequencies are friendly frequencies used for a particular operation. An
example of a protected frequency would be the command net of a maneuver force engaged in the
fight. (JP 3-13.1)
Guarded frequencies: Guarded frequencies are those enemy frequencies that maybe currently
exploited for combat information and intelligence. Guarded frequencies are time-oriented in that
the list changes as the enemy assumes different combat postures. These frequencies may be
jammed after the commander has weighed the potential operational gains against the loss of the
technical information gained. (JP 3-13.1)
D-36. Keep these reports in a database used as a history of interference problems. The purpose of the
interference report database is to provide the spectrum manager with a repository for previous interference
incidents and steps taken to resolve them. This database provides a wealth of information on unit discipline,
training deficiencies, and a starting place for the spectrum manager to begin resolving interference issues.
Spectrum managers share this database with all. To the extent, unexplained interference persists or recurs
coincident with either red, blue or grey operations, notification to the CEMA element occurs.
D-37. Spectrum managers must be involved at the onset of interference. Spectrum managers are responsible
for resolving and reporting of interference within their responsible area. This includes setting alerts in JSIRO
for interference affecting the units operations. They receive notifications by secure email of interference
reports submitted for action and situational understanding of the interference. Spectrum managers assist and
mitigate spectrum interference at the lowest level possible and should be knowledgeable of all forms of
jamming, deception, and interference. Users experiencing EMI may change frequencies only when the
spectrum manager coordinates authorized replacement frequencies. Guidance for the JSIR program is
contained within the CJCSM 3320.02 series manuals and instructions. Additional procedural guidance in
support of the JSIR program may apply based off command relationships such as military departments, Army
commands, and combatant commands.
Item
Data Input
Number
Enter the dates and times the interference occurred. Indicate whether the duration of the interference is
continuous or intermittent, the approximate repetition rate of the interference, and whether the amplitude
7
of the interference is varying or constant. Indicate if the interference is occurring at a regular or irregular
time of day, and if the occurrence of the interference coincides with any ongoing local activity.
The location of possible interference sources (coordinates or line of bearing, if known; otherwise, state as
8
unknown).
A listing of other units affected by the interference (if known) and their location or distance, and bearing
9
from the reporting site.
Clear and concise narrative summary information about the interference, and any local actions taken to
resolve the problem. The operator is encouraged to provide any other information, based on observation
10 or estimation that is pertinent in the technical or operational analysis of the incident.
Identify whether the information furnished is an actual observation, measurement or estimate. Avoid the
use of Army or program jargon and acronyms.
Reference message traffic related to the interference problem reported. Include the message date-time
11
group, originator, action addressees, and subject line.
12 Indicate whether identification or resolution of the problem is completed.
13 Indicate if joint spectrum interference resolution (JSIR) technical assistance is desired or anticipated.
14 Point of contact information, including name, unit, and contact phone numbers.
D-42. The spectrum manager or victim of interference, reports the types of interference signals, the actions
used to overcome the interference, the suspected cause and other comments related to the interference signal.
Send this report online or forward offline as soon as feasible, based on situation.
Recorded sounds. Recorded sounds are any audible sound, especially of a variable nature, to
distract radio operators and disrupt communications. Music, screams, applause, whistles,
machinery noise, and laughter are examples of recorded sounds jamming.
Preamble jamming. This type of jamming occurs when a broadcast resembling the
synchronization preamble speech of security equipment over the operating frequency of secure
radio sets. Preamble jamming results in all radios being locked in the receive mode. It is especially
effective when employed against radio nets using speech security devices.
Subtle jamming. Subtle jamming is not obvious; no sound from the receiver radio. The radio
cannot receive the intended incoming signal, even though everything appears normal to the radio
operator. In effect, the threat jammers block out these radios' ability to receive a friendly
transmission without the operator being aware it is happening. This is squelch capture and is a
subtle jamming technique. The radio operator can readily detect jamming in all other function
control modes. Often, we assume that our radios are malfunctioning instead of recognizing subtle
jamming for what it is.
Recognizing Jamming
D-45. Equipment operators must be able to recognize jamming. Threat jammers may employ obvious or
subtle jamming techniques. In addition, interference caused by sources having nothing to do with adversary
jamming may be the source. Jammers affect receivers and do not affect transmitters.
D-46. Prohibitive EMI may be caused by the following—
Unintentionally by other radios (friendly and enemy).
Other electronic or electric or electromechanical equipment.
Atmospheric conditions.
Malfunction of the radio.
Improper operation of the radio.
Combination of any of the above.
D-47. Internal or external interference. The two sources of interference are internal and external. If the
interference or suspected jamming remains after grounding or disconnecting the antenna, the disturbance is
most likely internal and caused by a malfunction of the radio. Contact maintenance personnel to assist in
troubleshooting. Further examinations could reveal external interference from adversary jamming or
unintentional interference.
D-48. Jamming or unintentional interference. Causes of unintentional interference include other radios,
some other type of electronic or electromechanical equipment, or atmospheric conditions. The battlefield is
so crowded with radios and other electronic equipment that some unintentional interference is virtually
unavoidable. Static electricity produced by atmospheric conditions can negatively affect radio
communications. Unintentional interference normally travels only a short distance and a search of the
immediate area may reveal the source of this type of interference. Moving the receiving antenna for short
distances may cause noticeable variations in the strength of the interfering signal. These variations normally
indicate unintentional interference. Conversely, little or no variation may indicate inadvertent friendly or
adversarial jamming. Regardless of the source, take actions to reduce the effect of interference on our
communications.
D-49. In all cases, report suspected adversary jamming and any unidentified or unintentional interference that
disrupts our ability to communicate. This applies even if the radio operator is able to overcome the effects of
the jamming or interference. Information provided to higher headquarters in the JSIR report mitigates the
adversary jamming efforts.
D-50. The adversary can use two types of jamming signals: powerful un-modulated or noise-modulated
signals. Un-modulated jamming signals lack any noise and noise modulated jamming signals have obvious
interference noises.
Overcoming Jamming
D-51. The adversary constantly strives to perfect and use new and more confusing forms of jamming. Our
equipment operators must be increasingly alert to the possibility of jamming. Training and experience are the
most important tools operators have to determine when a particular signal is a jamming signal. Exposure to
the effects of jamming in training or actual situations is invaluable. The ability to recognize jamming is
important, because jamming is a problem that requires action.
D-52. Continue to operate if jamming does occur. Usually, adversarial jamming involves a period of jamming
followed by a brief listening period. The adversary is attempting to determine how effective jamming has
been. What the victim is doing during this short period when listening, tells the jammer how effective
jamming has been. If the operation is continuing in a normal manner, as it was before the jamming began,
the enemy assumes that jamming has not been particularly effective. If the adversary finds users discussing
the jamming over the radio or shut down our operation entirely, the adversary may very well assume that
jamming has been effective. Because the enemy jammer is monitoring operations, unless otherwise ordered,
never shut down operations or in any other way disclose to the enemy that you may be adversely affected.
Normal operations should continue even when degraded by jamming.
D-55. Increasing the power output of the transmitter emitting the desired signal improves the signal-to-
jamming ratio. To increase the power output at the time of jamming, the transmitter must be set on something
less than full power when jamming begins. Using low power as a preventive technique depends on the
adversary not being able to detect radio transmissions. Once the adversary begins jamming radios, the threat
of being detected increases.
D-56. Users experiencing jamming should ensure antennas are optimally adjusted to receive the desired
incoming signal. Additional techniques to improve receive signal strength regarding antenna include—
Reorienting the antenna.
Changing the antenna polarization. (Perform this action at all stations.)
Installing an antenna with a longer range (higher gain).
D-57. Relocate the antenna. Frequently, the signal-to-jamming ratio maybe improved by relocating the
antenna and associated radio set affected by the jamming or unidentified interference. This may mean moving
a few meters or several hundred meters. It is best to relocate the antenna and associated radio set to an area
that has a terrain feature between the user and any suspected enemy jamming location.
D-58. Establish a retransmission station. A retransmission station can increase the range and power of a
signal between two or more radio stations. Depending on the available resources and the situation, this may
be a viable method to improve the signal-to-jamming ratio.
D-59. Use an alternate route for communications. In some instances, enemy jamming prevents us from
communicating with a radio station with which we must communicate. If radio communications have
degraded between two radio stations that must communicate, there may be another radio station or route of
communications that can communicate with both of the radio stations. Use the alternate radio station or route
as a relay between the two other radio stations.
D-60. Change frequencies. If a communications net cannot overcome adversarial jamming using the above
measures, the commander (or designated representative) may direct the net to switch to an alternate or spare
frequency coordinated through your spectrum manager. If practical, dummy stations can continue to operate
on the frequency being jammed to mask the change to an alternate frequency. Frequency changes that are
preplanned result in minimal communications loss. During adversarial jamming, it is very difficult to
coordinate a change of frequency.
OVERVIEW
E-1. Military time uses the 24-hour clock beginning at midnight (0000 hours) and ending at 2359 hours.
Military time format eliminates the need for using A.M. and P.M. designations as regular time uses numbers
1 to 12 to identify the hours in a day. In Military time 12 P.M. is 1200 hours, 1 P.M. is 1300 hours up until
11 P.M. where it is 2300 hours. The military uses this standard as it leaves less room for confusion than
standard time. The world is divided into 24 military time zones and each military zone has a letter designation
and the military phonetic alphabet word.
E-2. The time zone for Greenwich, England is the letter “Z” and the military phonetic word is “Zulu”. Since
many U.S. military operations must be coordinated across times zones, the military uses Coordinated
Universal Time (formerly Greenwich Mean Time) as the standard time. The U.S. Military refers to this as
Zulu (Z) time and attaches the suffix to ensure the referred time zone is clear.
E-3. When referring to specific military time zones, speak the letter or word attached. As an example, if a
military exercise began at 3:00 P.M. Zulu time; or “fifteen hundred hours Zulu time” and written as 1500Z.
E-4. The time zones from the U.S. are Romeo, Sierra, Tango, Uniform, Victor, Whiskey, X-Ray. Local time
uses the letter J or Juliet. Written format for 9 A.M. local time is 0900J and spoken as “Zero 900 hours Juliet
time.” The Lima time zone designator does not equate to local time. See Time Zone chart for the location of
Lima time zone.
E-5. Some countries have a 15, 30, or 45-minute offset from the designated time zone designator. Although
located in the Delta time zone, Juliet time in Afghanistan is Coordinated Universal Time +4 hours 30 minutes.
An asterisk behind the affected time zone designator denotes that a Juliet offset is in effect. See Time Zone
Chart for affected regions. This offset is recorded as 0430D* or 190430RDEC13* within a Date Time Group.
E-7. Many countries use military time as their main time format. European, African, Asian, and Latin
American countries commonly use military time as their main time format. In some countries, both the 12
and 24-hour clock are used. Figure E-1 shows the world map and military zone designators for each zone.
E-8. Table E-1 outlines each time zone around the world and provides its relationship to Zulu time.
Table E-1. Example of world time zone conversion (standard time)
Military Time Zone Designators
Y X W V U T S R Q P O N Z A B C D E F G H I K L M
Civilian Time Zones
WAST
ASDT
IDLW
WAT
IDLE
MST
UTC
CCT
GST
HST
CST
AST
NST
CET
SBT
PST
EST
EET
JST
ZP4
ZP5
ZP6
NT
AT
BT
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
** *
Standard Time=Universal Time + Value from Table
Z 0 E +5 K +10 P -3 U -8
A +1 F +6 L +11 Q -4 V -9
B +2 G +7 M +12 R -5 W -10
C +3 H +8 N -1 S -6 X -11
D +4 I +9 O -2 T -7 Y -12
* =Today ** =Yesterday
Legend
ASDT-Alaska Standard Time EST-Eastern Standard time PST-Pacific Standard Time
AST-Atlantic Standard Time GST-Guam Standard Time SBT-Solomon Island Time
AT-Azores Time HST-Hawaii Standard Time UTC-Coordinated Universal Time
AWST-Australian Western Standard Time IDLE-International Date Line East WAST-West Africa Time Zone
BT-Baghdad IDLW-International Date Line West WAT-West Africa Time
CCT-China Coast Time JST-Japan Standard Time ZP-4 Azerbaijan, Oman, Mauritius
CET-Central European Time MST-Mountain Standard Time ZP-5 Maldives, Pakistan, Tajikistan
CST-Central Standard Time NST-Newfoundland Standard Time ZP-6 Bangladesh, Kazakhstan
EET-Eastern European Time NT-Nome Time
SECTION II – TERMS
cyber electromagnetic activities
Activities leveraged to seize, retain, and exploit an advantage over adversaries and enemies in both
cyberspace and the electromagnetic spectrum, while simultaneously denying and degrading adversary
and enemy use of the same, and protecting the mission command system. (ADRP 3-0)
direction finding
(joint) A procedure for obtaining bearings of radio frequency emitters by using a highly directional
antenna and a display unit on an intercept receiver or ancillary equipment. (JP 1-02)
electromagnetic environmental effects
(joint) The impact of the electromagnetic environment upon the operational capability of military forces,
equipment, systems, and platforms. Also called E3 (JP 1-02)
electromagnetic interference
(joint) Any electromagnetic disturbance, induced intentionally or unintentionally, that interrupts,
obstructs, or otherwise degrades or limits the effective performance of electronics and electrical
equipment. Also called EMI (JP 1-02)
electromagnetic operational environment
(joint) The background electromagnetic environment and the friendly, neutral, and adversarial
electromagnetic order of battle within the electromagnetic area of influence associated with a given
operational area. Also called EMOE. (JP 6-01)
electromagnetic spectrum
(joint) The range of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation from zero to infinity. It is divided into 26
alphabetically designated bands. Also called EMS. (JP 1-02)
electromagnetic spectrum control
(joint) Coordinated execution of joint electromagnetic spectrum operations with other lethal and
nonlethal operations that enable freedom of action in the electromagnetic operational environment (JP
3-13.1)
electromagnetic spectrum management
(joint) Planning, coordinating, and managing joint use of the electromagnetic spectrum through
operational, engineering, and administrative procedures. (JP 6-01)
electronic warfare
(joint) Military action involving the use of electromagnetic and directed energy to control the
electromagnetic spectrum or to attack the enemy. Also called EW. (JP 3-13.1)
electronic attack
(joint) Division of electronic warfare involving the use of electromagnetic energy, directed energy, or
antiradiation weapons to attack personnel, facilities, or equipment with the intent of degrading,
neutralizing, or destroying enemy combat capability and is considered a form of fires. Also called EA.
(JP 3-13.1)
electronic protection
(joint) Division of electronic warfare involving actions taken to protect personnel, facilities, and
equipment from any effects of friendly or enemy use of the electromagnetic spectrum that degrade,
neutralize, or destroy friendly combat capability. Also called electronic protection. (JP 3-13.1)
electronic warfare support
(joint) Division of electronic warfare involving actions tasked by, or under the direct control of, an
operational commander to search for, intercept, identify, and locate or localize sources of intentional and
unintentional radiated electromagnetic energy for the purpose of immediate threat recognition, targeting,
planning, and conduct of future operations. Also called ES. (JP 3-13.1)
frequency allocation
An entry in the table of frequency allocations of a given frequency band for the purpose of its use by one
or more terrestrial or space radiocommunication services or the radio astronomy service under specified
conditions. This term shall also be applied to the frequency band concerned. (NTIA Redbook)
frequency allotment
An entry of a designated frequency channel in an agreed plan, adopted by a competent conference, for
use by one or more administrations for a terrestrial or space radiocommunication service in one or more
identified countries or geographical areas and under specified conditions. (NTIA Redbook)
frequency assignment
The authorization given by an administration for a radio station to use a radio frequency or radio
frequency channel under specified conditions. (NTIA Redbook)
frequency deconfliction
(joint) A systematic management procedure to coordinate the use of the electromagnetic spectrum for
operations, communications, and intelligence functions. Frequency deconfliction is one element of
electromagnetic spectrum management. (JP 1-02)
frequency proposal
(joint) A proposed frequency assignment which is in the approval process (upon approval it becomes a
frequency assignment). (MCEB Pub 8)
guarded frequencies
(joint) A list of time-oriented, enemy frequencies that are currently being exploited for combat
information and intelligence or jammed after the commander has weighed the potential operational gain
against the loss of the technical information. (JP 1-02)
host nation
(joint) A nation which receives the forces, supplies of allied nations or North Atlantic Treaty
Organization organizations to be located on, to operate in, or to transit through its territory. Also called
HN. (JP 1-02)
joint electromagnetic spectrum operations
(joint) Those activities consisting of electronic warfare and joint electromagnetic spectrum management
operations used to exploit, attack, protect, and manage the electromagnetic operational environment to
achieve the commander’s objectives. Also called JEMSO. (JP 1-02.)
joint restricted frequency list
(joint) A time and geographically oriented listing of TABOO, PROTECTED, and GUARDED
functions, nets, and frequencies and limited to the minimum number of frequencies necessary for
friendly forces to accomplish objectives. Also called JRFL. (JP 1-02)
joint spectrum interference resolution
(joint) is a process designed to mitigate or define the procedures to mitigate Electromagnetic interference
(EMI) that regularly hampers the mission command of military or non-military operations by degrading
essential systems that use the electromagnetic spectrum. Since EMI can be caused by enemy, neutral,
friendly, or natural sources, it generally must be resolved on a case-by-case basis. The intent of the JSIR
procedures (CJCSM 3320.02D) is to mitigate EMI incidents at the lowest possible level within the
command structure. However, when the cause and recipient of the interference are not within the same
component force or supporting element, resolution may require assistance from the combatant command,
joint task force (JTF), Service Spectrum Management Headquarters or higher levels of authority. Also
called JSIR. (MCEB Pub 8)
military decisionmaking process
An interactive planning methodology to understand the situation and mission, develop a courses of
action, and produce an operation plan or order. (ADP 5-0)
protected frequencies
(joint) Friendly, generally time-oriented, frequencies used for a particular operation, identified and
protected to prevent them from being inadvertently jammed by friendly forces while active electronic
warfare operations are directed against hostile forces. (JP 1-02)
spectrum management operations
The interrelated functions of spectrum mangement, frequency assignment, host nation coordination, and
policy that together enable the planning, management, and execution of operations within the
electromagnetic operational environment during all phases of military operations. Also called SMO. (FM
6-02)
standard frequency action format
(joint) used for DOD radio frequency proposals, assignments, modifications, renewals, reviews, and
deletions. Will be replaced by the standard spectrum resource format. Also called SFAF. (MCEB Pub 7)
RELATED PUBLICATIONS
These documents contain relevant supplemental information.
JOINT PUBLICATIONS
Most joint publications are available online: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine.
CJCSM 3320.01C. Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations in the Electromagnetic
Operational Environment. 14 December 2012.
CJCSM 3320.02D. Joint Spectrum Interference Resolution (JSIR) Procedures. 3 June 2013.
JP 3-13.1. Electronic Warfare. 8 February 2012.
JP 3-28. Defense Support of Civil Authorities. 31 July 2013
JP 6-01. Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations. 20 March 2012.
MCEB Pub 7. Standard Frequency Action Format (SFAF). 20 November 2012.
MCEB Pub 8. Standard Spectrum Resource Format (SSRF). 4 April 2012.
ARMY PUBLICATIONS
Most Army doctrinal publications and regulations are available online: http://www.apd.army.mil.
ADP 3-0. Unified Land Operation. 10 October 2011.
ADP 5-0. The Operations Process. 17 May 2012.
ADRP 3-0. Unified Land Operations. 16 May 2012.
ADRP 3-28. Defense Support of Civil Authorities. 14 June 2013.
AR 5-12. Army Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum. 15 February 2013.
AR 380-5. Department of the Army Information Security Program. 29 September 2000.
ATP 3-36. Electronic Warfare. 16 December 2014.
FM 3-38. Cyber Electromagnetic Activities. 12 February 2014.
FM 6-0. Commander and Staff Organization and Operations. 05 May 2014.
FM 6-02. Signal Support to Operations. 22 January 2014.
FM 27-10. The Law of Land Warfare. 18 July 1956.
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
National Telecommunications and Information Administration Redbook. Manual of Regulations and
Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management. May 2013 found online at the
following; http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/redbook/redbook.html.
Title 10 of the United States Code. Armed Forces.
Title 32 of the United States Code. National Defense.
Title 47 of the United States Code. Telecommunication.
http://uscode.house.gov/.
PRESCRIBED FORMS
None.
REFERENCED FORMS
Unless otherwise indicated, DA Forms are available on the Army Publishing Directorate (ADP)
website: www.apd.army.mil.
DA Form 2028. Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms.
DD Forms are available on the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) web site:
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/formsprogram.htm.
DD Form 1494. Application for Equipment Frequency Allocation.
WEBSITES
Acquisition Community Connection.
https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=18002&lang=en-US.
Spectrum XXI overview. http://www.disa.mil/jsc/pdf/SPECTRUMXXI_JSC.pdf.
MARK A. MILLEY
General, United States Army
Chief of Staff
Official:
GERALD B. O’KEEFE
Administrative Assistant to the
Secretary of the Army
1535501
DISTRIBUTION:
Active Army, Army National Guard, and United States Army Reserve: Distributed in electronic media
only (EMO).
PIN: 105928-000