Application of Microorganisms in Bioremediationreview PDF
Application of Microorganisms in Bioremediationreview PDF
Application of Microorganisms in Bioremediationreview PDF
Abatenh E, Gizaw B, Tsegaye Z, et al. Application of microorganisms in through the all-inclusive and action of microorganisms. The main principle
bioremediation-review Journal of Environmental Microbiology December is degrading and transforming pollutants such as hydrocarbons, oil, heavy
2017;1(1):02-09. metal, pesticides, dye’s and so on. That is carried out in enzymatic way
through metabolizing, so it have grate contribution role to solve many
Bioremediation is a biological mechanism of recycling wastes in to environmental problems. There are two types of factors these are biotic
another form that can use and reused by other organisms. Nowadays, the and abiotic conditions are determine rate of degradation. Currently,
world is facing the problem of different environmental pollution. different methods and strategies are applied in the area in different part of
Microorganisms are essential for a key alternative solution to overcome the world. For example, biostimulation, bioaugementation, bioventing,
challenges. Microorganisms are survive in all place on the biospher biopiles and bioattenuation are common one. All bioremidation techniques
because of their metabolic activity is astonishing; then come into existence it has its own advantage and disadvantage because it has its own specific
in all over range of environmental conditions. The nutritional capacity of application.
microorganisms is completely varied, so it is used as bioremidation of KeyWords: Microorganisms; Factors; Bioremediation; Pollutants;
environmental pollutants. Bioremediation is highly involved in Biodegradation; Biostimulation; Bioaugementation; Bioventing; Biopiles;
degradation, eradication, immobilization, or detoxification diverse Bioattenuation
chemical wastes and physical hazardous materials from the surrounding
INTRODUCTION pollutants only when they have access to a variety of materials compounds
to help them generate energy and nutrients to build more cells. The
Microorganisms are widely distributed on the biosphere because of their
efficiency of bioremediation depends on many factors; including, the
metabolic ability is very impressive and they can easily grow in a wide
chemical nature and concentration of pollutants, the physicochemical
range of environmental conditions. The nutritional versatility of
characteristics of the environment, and their availability to microorganisms
microorganisms can also be exploited for biodegradation of pollutants.
[4]. The reason for rate of degradation is affected due to bacteria and
This kind of process is termed as bioremediation. It is continued through
pollutants do not contact each other. In addition to this, microbes and
based on the ability of certain microorganisms to convert, modify and
pollutants are not uniformly spread in the environment. The controlling
utilize toxic pollutants in order to obtaining energy and biomass
and optimizing of bioremediation processes is a complex system due to
production in the process [1]. Instead of simply collecting the pollutant
many factors. These factors are included here: the existence of a microbial
and storing it, bioremediation is a microbiological well organized
population capable of degrading the pollutants, the availability of
procedural activity which is applied to break down or transform
contaminants to the microbial population and environment factors (type of
contaminates to less toxic or non-toxic elemental and compound forms.
soil, temperature, pH, the presence of oxygen or other electron acceptors,
Bioremediators are biological agents used for bioremediation in order to
and nutrients).
clean up contaminated sites. Bacteria, archaea and fungi are typical prime
bioremediators [2]. The application of bioremediation as a
biotechnological process involving microorganisms for solving and Biological factors
removing dangers of many pollutants through biodegradation from the A biotic factors are affect the degradation of organic compounds through
environment. Bioremediation and biodegradation terms are more competition between microorganisms for limited carbon sources,
interchangable words. Microorganisms are act as a significant pollutant antagonistic interactions between microorganisms or the predation of
removal tools in soil, water, and sediments; mostly due to their advantage microorganisms by protozoa and bacteriophages. The rate of contaminant
over other remediation procedural protocols. Microorganisms are restoring degradation is often dependent on the concentration of the contaminant
the original natural surroundings and preventing further pollution [3]. The and the amount of “catalyst” present. In this context, the amount of
aim of review to express current trend the application/role of “catalyst” represents the number of organisms able to metabolize the
microorganisms on bioremediation and to contribute relevant background contaminant as well as the amount of enzymes(s) produced by each cell.
which is identified gaps in this thematic area. Presently, it is hot research The expression of specific enzymes by the cells can increase or decrease
area because microorganisms are eco-friendly and promising valuable the rate of contaminant degradation. Furthermore, the extent to
genetic material to solve environmental threats. contaminant metabolism specific enzymes must be participated and their
“affinity” for the contaminant and also the availability of the contaminant
Factors affecting microbial bioremediation is largely needed. The major biological factors are included here:
mutation, horizontal gene transfer, enzyme activity, interaction
Bioremediation is involved in degrading, removing, altering,
(competition, succession, and predation), its own growth until critical
immobilizing, or detoxifying various chemicals and physical wastes from
biomass is reached, population size and composition [5,6].
the environment through the action of bacteria, fungi and plants.
Microorganisms are involved through their enzymatic pathways act as
biocatalysts and facilitate the progress of biochemical reactions that
degrade the desired pollutant. Microorganisms are act against the
Ethiopia Biodiversity Institute, Department of Microbiology, Comoros Street, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Correspondence: Abatenh E, Ethiopia Biodiversity Institute, Department of Microbiology, Comoros Street, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Telephone:
+251912803908, E-mail: [email protected]
Received: October 20, 2017, Accepted: December 20, 2017, Published: December 22, 2017
This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is
properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact [email protected]
The advantage of bioremediation • Nonintrusive, potentially allowing for continued site use.
• Relative ease of implementation [17].
• It is a natural process, it takes a little time, as an acceptable waste
• Effective way of remediating natural ecosystem from a number of
treatment process for contaminated material such as soil. Microbes
contaminant and act as environment friendly options [22].
able to degrade the contaminant and increase in numbers when the
contaminant is present. When the contaminant is degraded, the
biodegradative population become declines. The residues for the The disadvantage of bioremediation
treatment are usually harmless product including water carbon dioxide
• It is limited to those compounds that are biodegradable. Not all
and cell biomass.
compounds are susceptible to rapid and complete degradation.
• It requires a very less effort and can often be carried out on site, often
• There are some concerns that the products of biodegradation may be
without causing a major disruption of normal activities. This also
more persistent or toxic than the parent compound.
eliminates the need to transport quantities of waste off site and the
potential threats to human health and the environment that can arise • Biological processes are often highly specific. Important site factors
during transportation. required for success include the presence of metabolically capable
microbial populations, suitable environmental growth conditions, and
• It is applied in a cost effective process as it lost less than the other
appropriate levels of nutrients and contaminants.
conventional methods (technologies) that are used for clean-up of
hazardous waste. Important method for the treatment of oil- • It is difficult to extrapolate from bench and pilot-scale studies to full-
contaminated sites [19]. scale field operations.
• It also helps in complete destruction of the pollutants, many of the • Research is needed to develop and engineer bioremediation
hazardous compounds can be transformed to harmless products, and technologies that are appropriate for sites with complex mixtures of
this feature also eliminates the chance of future liability associated contaminants that are not evenly dispersed in the environment.
with treatment and disposal of contaminated material. Contaminants may be present as solids, liquids and gases.
• It does not use any dangerous chemicals. Nutrients especially • It often takes longer than other treatment options, such as excavation
fertilizers added to make active and fast microbial growth. and removal of soil or incineration.
Commonly, used on lawns and gardens. Because of bioremediation • Regulatory uncertainty remains regarding acceptable performance
change harmful chemicals into water and harmless gases, the harmful criteria for bioremediation. There is no accepted definition of “clean”,
chemicals are completely destroyed [20]. evaluating performance of bioremediation is difficult.
• Simple, less labor intensive and cheap due to their natural role in the • Requires very skilled human power (Tables 1-5) [17].
environment.
• Eco-friendly and sustainable [21]. MICROORGANISMS AND POLLUTANTS
• Contaminants are destroyed, not simply transferred to different
environmental media.
cyanobacteria, green algae and diatoms and Bacillus licheniformis naphtalene [33,34]
Alcaligenes odorans, Bacillus subtilis, Corynebacterium propinquum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa oil [22]
Aspergillus niger, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei and Saccharomyces cerevisiae crude oil [39]
Pseudomonas cepacia, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus coagulans, Citrobacter koseri and Serratia ficaria diesel oil, crude oil [42]
Table 3: Representative examples of most dominate microorganisms in the involvement of dyes bioremadation.
Pycnoporus sanguineous, Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trametes trogii industrial dyes [47]
Micrococcus luteus, Listeria denitrificans and Nocardia atlantica Textile Azo Dyes [49]
Bacillus firmus, Bacillus macerans, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella oxytoca vat dyes, Textile effluents [53]
Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Fe2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Mn2+ and Cu2+ [59]
Heavy metals cannot be destroyed biologically (“no degradation”, changes occur in the nuclear structure of the element), but only transformed from one oxidation state or
organic complex to another. Besides, bacteria are also efficient in heavy metals bioremediation. Microorganisms have developed the capabilities to protect themselves
from heavy metal toxicity by various mechanisms, such as adsorption, uptake, methylation, oxidation and reduction. Microorganism’s uptake heavy metals actively
(bioaccumulation) and/or passively (adsorption). Microbial methylation plays an important role in heavy metals bioremediation, because methylated compounds are
frequently volatile. For example, Mercury, Hg (II) can be biomethylated by a number of different bacterial species Alcaligenes faecalis, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus sp., P.
aeruginosa and Brevibacterium iodinium to gaseous methyl mercury [54].
Pseudomonas putida, Acinetobacter sp., Arthrobacter sp. Ridomil MZ 68 MG, Fitoraz WP 76, Decis 2.5 EC, malation [70,71]
with their release in the surrounding, In a particular level it showed that 2. Strong PJ, Burgess JE. Treatment methods for wine-related ad
delay of growth and substrate degradation, seasonal variation and other distillery wastewaters: a review. Biorem J. 2008;12(2):70-87.
abiotic factor fluctuation have direct and indirect impact and relationship 3. Demnerova K, Mackova M, Spevakova, V, et al. Two approaches to
on microbial activity; finally, introduced foreign modified strain to the biological decontamination of groundwater and soil polluted by
system leads to unreacted and cause unmeasurable adverse effect on the aromatics characterization of microbial populations. International
natural structural and functional microorganism’s community composition Microbiology. 2005;8:205-11.
and occurrence. 4. El Fantroussi S, Agathos SN. Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy
for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr Opin Microbiol.
BIOVENTING 2005;8:268-75.
Bioventing is involved in venting of oxygen through soil to stimulate 5. Madhavi GN, Mohini DD. Review paper on – Parameters affecting
growth of natural or introduced bacteria and fungus in the soil by bioremediation. International journal of life science and pharma
providing oxygen to existing soil microorganisms; indeed, it is functional research. 2012;2(3):77-80.
in aerobically degradable compounds. Bioventing uses low air flow rates 6. Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour
to provide only enough oxygen to sustain microbial activity. Oxygen is Technol. 2000;74:63-7.
most commonly supplied through direct air injection into residual 7. Adams GO, Fufeyin PT, Okoro SE, et al. Bioremediation,
contamination in soil by means of wells. Adsorbed fuel residuals are Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review. International Journal
biodegraded, and volatile compounds also are biodegraded as vapors of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation. 2015;3(1):
move slowly through biologically active soil. Effective bioremediation of 28-39.
petroleum contaminated soil using bioventing has been proved by many 8. Cases I, de Lorenzo V. Genetically modified organisms for the
researchers [84,85]. environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned
from them. International microbiology. 2005;8:213-22.
BIOPILES 9. Couto N, Fritt-Rasmussen J, Jensen PE, et al. Suitability of oil
bioremediation in an Artic soil using surplus heating from an
Biopiles is a way of excavated soil contaminated with aerobically
incineration facility. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,
remediable hydrocarbons, can be treated in "biopiles". Biopiles (also
2014;21(9):6221-7.
known as biocells, bioheaps, biomounds, and compost Piles) are used to
reduce concentrations of petroleum pollutants in excavated soils during 10. Phulia V, Jamwal A, Saxena N, et al. Technologies in aquatic
the time of biodegradation. In this process, air is supplied to the biopile bioremediation. Kumar P, Zaki BMSA, Chauhan A, editors.
system during a system of piping and pumps that either forces air into the Freshwater ecosystem and xenobiotics. Discovery Publishing House
pile under positive pressure or draws air through the pile under negative PVT. Ltd.: India; 2013; pp. 65-91.
pressure [86]. The microbial activity is enhanced through microbial 11. Thavasi R, Jayalakshmi S, Banat IM. Application of biosurfactant
respiration then the result in degradation of adsorbed petroleum pollutant produced from peanut oil cake by Lactobacillus delbrueckii in
became high [87,88]. biodegradation of crude oil. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(3):
3366-72.
CONCLUSION 12. Macaulay BM. Understanding the behavior of oil-degrading micro-
organisms to enhance the microbial remediation of spilled petroleum.
Biodegradation is very fruitful and attractive option to remediating, Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2015;13(1):247-62.
cleaning, managing and recovering technique for solving polluted 13. Das N, Chandran P. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon
environment through microbial activity. In the future in the area contaminants: An overview. Biotechnol Res Int. 2011;1-13.
researchers should be explore novel species which have grate potential.
14. Yang SZ, Jin HJ, Wei Z, et al. Bioremediation of oil spills in cold
The speed of unwanted waste substances degradation is determined in
environments: A review. Pedosphere. 2009;19(3):371-81.
competition with in biological agents, inadequate supply with essential
nutrient, uncomfortable external abiotic conditions (aeration, moisture, 15. Enim AE. Factors that Determine Bioremediation of Organic
pH, temperature), and low bioavailability of the pollutant. Due to these Compounds in the Soil. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary
factors, biodegradation in natural condition is not more successful leads to Studies. 2013;2(13):125-8.
be less favorable. As bioremediation can be effective only where 16. Wang Q, Zhang S, Li Y, et al. Potential Approaches to Improving
environmental conditions permit microbial growth and activity. Biodegradation of Hydrocarbons for Bioremediation of Crude Oil
Bioremediation has been used in different sites globally within varying Pollution. Environ Protection J. 2011;2:47-55.
degrees of success. Mainly, the advantages are greater than that of 17. Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD, et al. Review on Bioremediation of
disadvantages which is evident by the number of sites that choose to use Polluted Environment: A Management Tool. International journal of
this technology and its increasing popularity through time. Generally, Environmental Sciences. 2011;1(6):1079-93.
different species are explored from different sites and they are effective in 18. Jain PK, Bajpai V. Biotechnology of bioremediation- a review.
control way. International journal of environmental sciences. 2012;3(1): 535-49.
19. Montagnolli RN, Matos Lopes PR, Bidoia ED. Assessing Bacillus
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS subtilis biosurfactant effects on the biodegradation of petroleum
products. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015;187(4116):1-17.
The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.
20. Sharma S. Bioremediation: Features, Strategies and applications.
Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Science. 2012;2(2): 202-13.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
21. Dell’Anno A, Beolchini F, Rocchetti L, et al. High bacterial
I would like to thank Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute and my colleague to biodiversity increases degradation performance of hydrocarbons
provide support and opportunity to work this review. during bioremediation of contaminated harbor marine sediments.
Environ Pollut. 2012;167:85-92.
REFERENCES 22. Singh A, Kumar V, Srivastava JN. Assessment of Bioremediation of
Oil and Phenol Contents in Refinery Waste Water via Bacterial
1. Tang CY, Criddle QS Fu CS, Leckie JO. Effect of flux (trans
Consortium. J Pet Environ Biotechnol. 2013;4(3):1-4.
membrane pressure) and membranes properties on fouling and
rejection of reverse osmosis and nano filtration membranes treating 23. Pedro P, Francisco J E, Joao F, et al. DNA damage induced by
perfluorooctane sulfonate containing waste water. J Enviro Sci Tech. hydroquinone can be prevented by fungal detoxification. Toxicology
2007;41:2008-14. Reports. 2014;1:1096-1105.
24. Abdulsalam S, Adefila SS, Bugaje IM, et al. Bioremediation of soil 44. Jasin´ ska A, Rózalska S, Bernat P, et al. Malachite green
contaminated with used motor oil in a closed system. Bioremediation decolorization by non-basidiomycete filamentous fungi of
and Biodegradation. 2013;3:100-172. Penicillium pinophilum and Myrothecium roridum. Int Biodeterior
25. Safiyanu I, Abdulwahid Isah A, Abubakar US, et al. Review on Biodegrad. 2012;73:33–40.
Comparative Study on Bioremediation for Oil Spills Using 45. Jasin´ ska A, Bernat P, Paraszkiewicz K. Malachite green removal
Microbes. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and from aqueous solution using the system rapeseed press cake and
Chemical Sciences. 2015;6(6):783-90. fungus Myrothecium roridum. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013;1-9.
26. Sani I, Safiyanu I, Rita S M. Review on Bioremediation of Oil Spills 46. Jasin´ ska A, Paraszkiewicz K, Sip A, et al. Malachite green
Using Microbial Approach. IJESR. 2015;3(6):41-45. decolorization by the filamentous fungus Myrothecium roridum –
27. Sarang B, Richa K, Ram C. Comparative Study of Bioremediation of Mechanistic study and process optimization. Bioresource
Hydrocarbon Fuel. International Journal of Biotechnology and Technology. 2015;194:43-8.
Bioengineering Research. 2013;4(7):677-86. 47. Yan J, Niu J, Chen D, et al. Screening of Trametes strains for
28. Erika A W, Vivian B, Claudia C, et al. Biodegradation of phenol in efficient decolorization of malachite green at high temperatures and
static cultures by Penicillium chrysogenum erk1: catalytic abilities ionic concentrations. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2014;87:109-15.
and residual phytotoxicity. Rev Argent Mcrobiol. 2013;44(2):113-21. 48. Shedbalkar U, Jadhav J. Detoxification of malachite green and textile
29. AI-Jawhari IFH. Ability of Some Soil Fungi in Biodegradation of industrial effluent by Penicillium ochrochloron. Biotechnol
Petroleum Hydrocarbon. Journal of Applied & Environmental Bioprocess Eng. 2011;16:196-204.
Microbiology. 2014;2(2):46-52 49. Hassan MM, Alam MZ, Anwar MN. Biodegradation of Textile Azo
30. Aranda E, Ullrich R, Hofrichter M. Conversion of polycyclic Dyes by Bacteria Isolated from Dyeing Industry Effluent. Int Res J
aromatic hydrocarbons, methyl naphthalenes and dibenzofuran by Biological Sci. 2013;2(8):27-31.
two fungal peroxygenases. Biodegradation. 2010;21(2):267-81. 50. Shah MP, Patel KA, Nair SS, et al. Microbial degradation of Textile
31. Karigar CS, Rao SS. Role of microbial enzymes in the Dye (Remazol Black B) by Bacillus spp. ETL-2012. J Bioremed
bioremediation of pollutants: a review. Enzyme Res. 2011;1-11. Biodeg. 2013;4(2):1-5.
32. Hesham A, Khan S, Tao Y, et al. Biodegradation of high molecular 51. Yogesh P, Akshaya G. Evaluation of Bioremediation Potential of
weight PAHs using isolated yeast mixtures: application of Isolated Bacterial Culture YPAG-9 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) for
metagenomic methods for community structure analyses. Environ Decolorization of Sulfonated di-azodye Reactive Red HE8B under
Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012;19:3568-78. Optimized Culture Conditions. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci.
33. Sivakumar G, Xu J, Thompson RW, et al. Integrated green algal 2016;5(8):258-72.
technology for bioremediation and biofuel. Bioresour Technol. 52. Das A, Mishra S, Verma VK. Enhanced biodecolorization of textile
2012;107:1-9. dye remazol navy blue using an isolated bacterial strain Bacillus
34. Lin C, Gan L, Chen ZL. Biodegradation of naphthalene by strain pumilus HKG212 under improved culture conditions. J Biochem
Bacillus fusiformis (BFN). J Hazard Mater. 2010;182:771-7. Tech. 2015;6(3):962-9.
35. Simarro R, Gonzalez N, Bautista LF, et al. Assessment of the 53. Adebajo SO, Balogun SA, Akintokun AK. Decolourization of Vat
efficiency of in situ bioremediation techniques in a creosote polluted Dyes by Bacterial Isolates Recovered from Local Textile Mills in
soil: change in bacterial community. J Hazard Mater. Southwest. Microbiology Research Journal International.
2013;262:158-67. 2017;18(1):1-8.
36. Yadav M, Singh S, Sharma J, et al. Oxidation of polyaromatic 54. Jaysankar D, Ramaiah N, Vardanyan L. Detoxification of toxic heavy
hydrocarbons in systems containing water miscible organic solvents metals by marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury. Marine
by the lignin peroxidase of Gleophyllum striatum MTCC-1117. Biotechnology. 2008;10(4):471-7.
Environ Technol. 2013;32:1287-94. 55. Chen C, Wang JL. Characteristics of Zn2+ biosorption by
37. Hidayat A, Tachibana S. Biodegradation of aliphatic hydrocarbon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomed. Enviro Sci. 2007; 20:478–82.
three types of crude oil by Fusarium sp. F092 under stress with 56. Talos K, Pager C, Tonk S, et al. Cadmium biosorption on native
artificial sea water. Journal of Environmental Science and Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in aqueous suspension. Acta Univ
Technology. 2012;5(1):64-73. Sapientiae Agric Environ. 2009;1:20-30.
38. Maliji D, Olama Z, Holail H. Environmental studies on the microbial 57. Infante JC, De Arco RD, Angulo ME. Removal of lead, mercury and
degradation of oil hydrocarbons and its application in Lebanese oil nickel using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Revista MVZ
polluted coastal and marine ecosystem. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. Córdoba. 2014;19:4141-9.
2013;2(6):1-18. 58. Tigini V, Prigione V, Giansanti P, et al. Fungal biosorption, an
39. Burghal AA, Abu-Mejdad NMJA, Tamimi WHA. Mycodegradation innovative treatment for the decolourisation and detoxification of
of Crude Oil by Fungal Species Isolated from Petroleum textile effluents. Water. 2010;2:550–65.
Contaminated Soil. International Journal of Innovative Research in 59. Paranthaman SR, Karthikeyan B. Bioremediation of heavy metal in
Science, Engineering and Technology. 2016;5(2):1517-24. paper mill effluent using Pseudomonas spp. International Journal of
40. El-Borai AM, Eltayeb KM, Mostafa AR, et al. Biodegradation of Microbiology. 2015;1:1-5.
Industrial Oil-Polluted Wastewater in Egypt by Bacterial Consortium 60. Peña-Montenegro TD, Lozano L, Dussán J. Genome sequence and
Immobilized in Different Types of Carriers. Pol J Environ Stud. description of the mosquitocidal and heavy metal tolerant strain
2016;25(5):1901-9. Lysinibacillus sphaericus CBAM5. Stand Genomic Sic. 2015;10(2):
41. Sukumar S, Nirmala P. Screening of diesel oil degrading bacteria 1-10.
from petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Int J Adv Res Biol 61. Wu YH, Zhou P, Cheng H, et al. Draft genome sequence of
Sci. 2016;3(8):18-22. Microbacterium profundi Shh49T, an Actinobacterium isolated from
42. Kehinde FO, Isaac SA. Effectiveness of augmented consortia of deep-sea sediment of a polymetallic nodule environment. Genome
Bacillus coagulans, Citrobacter koseri and Serratia ficaria in the Announcments. 2015;3:1-2.
degradation of diesel polluted soil supplemented with pig dung. Afr J 62. Soleimani N, Fazli MM, Mehrasbi M, et al. Highly cadmium tolerant
Microbiol Res. 2016;10(39):1637-44. fungi: Their tolerance and removal potential. Journal of
43. Phulpoto H, Qazi1 M A, Mangi S, et al. Biodegradation of oil-based Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2015;13(19):1-9.
paint by Bacillus species monocultures isolated from the paint 63. Mirlahiji SG, Eisazadeh K. Bioremediation of Uranium by Geobacter
warehouses. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2016;13:125-34. spp. Journal of Research and Development. 2014;1:52-8.
64. Priyalaxmi R, Murugan A, Raja P, et al. Bioremediation of cadmium Potamogetonaceae plants. J Genet Environ Resour Conserv.
by Bacillus safensis (JX126862), a marine bacterium isolated from 2013;1(2):106-10.
mangrove sediments. International Journal of Current Microbiology 78. Gomez F, Sartaj M. Optimization of field scale biopiles for
and Applied Sciences. 2014;3:326-35. bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil at low
65. Sinha SN, Biswas M, Paul D, et al. Biodegradation potential of temperature conditions by response surface methodology (RSM). Int
bacterial isolates from tannery effluent with special reference to Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2014;89:103-9.
hexavalent chromium. Biotechnology Bioinformatics and 79. Sayler GS, Ripp S. Field applications of genetically engineered
Bioengineering. 2011;1(3):381-6. microorganisms for bioremediation processes. Current Opinion in
66. Sinha SN, Paul D. Heavy metal tolerance and accumulation by Biotechnology. 2000;11:286-9.
bacterial strains isolated from waste water. Journal of Chemical, 80. Thapa B, Kumar AKC, Ghimire A. A review on Bioremediation of
Biological and Physical Sciences. 2014;4(1):812-7. petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu University.
67. Sinha SN, Biswas K. Bioremediation of lead from river water Journal of science, engineering and technology. 2012;8(I):164-70.
through lead-resistant purple-nonsulfur bacteria. Global Journal of 81. Jain PK, Gupta VK, Bajpai V, et al. GMO’s: Perspective of
Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014; 2(1):11-8. Bioremediation. In: Recent Advances in Environmental
68. Mohamed AT, Hussein AA, Siddig MA, et al. Degradation of Biotechnology. Jain PK, Gupta VK, Bajpai V, editors. LAP Lambert
oxyfluorfen herbicide by Soil microorganisms: Biodegradation of Academic Publishing AG and Co. KG: Germany; 2011b; pp. 6-23.
herbicides. Biotechnol. 2011;10:274-9. 82. Jain PK, Gupta VK, Gaur RK, et al. Fungal Enzymes: Potential
69. Niti C, Sunita S, Kukreja K, et al. Bioremediation: An emerging Tools of Environmental Processes. In: Fungal Biochemistry and
Technology for remediation of pesticides. Research Journal of Biotechnology. Gupta VK, Tuohy M, Gaur RK, editors. LAP
Chemistry and Environment. 2013;17(4):88-105. Lambert Academic Publishing AG and Co. KG: Germany; 2010c;
70. Mónica P, Darwin RO, Manjunatha B, et al. Evaluation of various pp: 44-56.
pesticides-degrading pure bacterial cultures isolated from pesticide- 83. Kulshreshtha S. Genetically Engineered Microorganisms: A Problem
contaminated soils in Ecuador. Afr J Biotechnol. 2016;15(40): Solving Approach for Bioremediation. J Bioremed Biodeg.
2224-33. 2013;4(4):1-2.
71. Hussaini S, Shaker M, Asef M. Isolation of Bacterial for Degradation 84. Lee TH, Byun IG, Kim YO, et al. Monitoring biodegradation of
of selected pesticides. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol Life Sci. 2013;2(4): diesel fuel in bioventing processes using in situ respiration rate.
50-3. Water Science and Technology, 53(4-5):263-72.
72. Ravi RK, Pathak B, Fulekar MH. Bioremediation of Persistent 85. Agarry S, Latinwo GK. Biodegradation of diesel oil in soil and its
Pesticides in Rice field Soil Environment Using Surface Soil enhancement by application of Bioventing and amendment with
Treatment Reactor. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(2):359-69. brewery waste effluents as Biostimulation-Bioaugmentation agents.
73. Mulligana CN, Yong RN. Natural attenuation of contaminated soils. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2015;16(2):82-91.
Environment International. 2004;30:587-601. 86. Delille D, Duval A, Pelletier E. Highly efficient pilot biopiles for on-
74. Li CH, Wong YS, Tam NF. Anaerobic biodegradation of polycyclic site fertilization treatment of diesel oil-contaminated sub-Antarctic
aromatic hydrocarbons with amendment of iron (III) in mangrove soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2008;54:7-18.
sediment slurry. Bio resource Technology. 2010;101:8083-92. 87. Emami S, Pourbabaee AA, Alikhani HA. Bioremediation Principles
75. Niu GL, Zhang JJ, Zhao S, et al. Bioaugmentation of a 4- and Techniques on Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil.
chloronitrobenzene contaminated soil with Pseudomonas putida Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2012;2(10):
ZWL73. Environmental Pollution. 2009;57:763-71. 320-3.
76. Malik ZA, Ahmed S. Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by oil 88. Kumar S, Chaurasia P, Kumar A. Isolation and Characterization of
field isolated bacterial consortium. African J Biotechnol. 2012;11(3): Microbial Strains from Textile Industry Effluents of Bhilwara, India:
650-8. Analysis with Bioremediation. Journal of Chemical and
77. Alwan AH, Fadil SM, Khadair SH, et al. Bioremediation of the water Pharmaceutical Research. 2016;8(4):143-50.
contaminated by waste of hydrocarbon by use Ceratophyllaceae and