Embrio PDF
Embrio PDF
Embrio PDF
REVIEW
ABSTRACT - Somatic or asexual embryogenesis is the process by which somatic cells develop into
plants. The rapid improvement in somatic embryogenesis methods allow the use of somatic embryos in
plant micropropagation as synthetic seeds. However, practical applications of somatic embryogenesis
are not limited to synthetic seed technology. Somatic embryogenesis can be used in the regeneration of
genetically transformed plants, polyploid plants, or somatic hybrids. Moreover, promising results indicate
the possibility to use somatic embryogenesis in cell selection programs and germplasm cryopreservation.
The application of somatic embryogenesis to plant virus elimination, metabolite production, and in vitro
mychorrhizal initiation has been investigated.
Additional index terms: cell selection, cryopreservation, plant regeneration, somatic hybrid, transgenic
plants, virus elimination.
1
2 Vicient & Martínez
FIGURE 1- Schematic representation of the different strategies that have been used in the regeneration of genetically transformed
plants using somatic embryogenesis. A, Transformation of the explant and regeneration via direct somatic embryogenesis; B,
Transformation of the explant and regeneration via indirect somatic embryogenesis; C, Transformation of embryogenic in vitro cell
culture and regeneration via indirect somatic embryogenesis; D, Transformation of somatic embryos and regeneration through
secondary somatic embryogenesis; E, Transformation of somatic embryos, proliferation through secondary embryogenesis and
regeneration through organogenesis. In the squares the phase in which transformation is performed. DSE, direct somatic
embryogenesis; ISE, indirect somatic embryogenesis; SSE, secondary somatic embryogenesis. In white, non-transformed tissues;
in grey, tissues subjected to transformation; in black, stably transformed tissues.
TABLE 1- Species of agroforestry interest in which regeneration of transformed plant has been made using somatic embryogenesis.
S P E C IE S S T R AT E G Y T R A N S F O R M AT I O N REFERENCES
A g r o s tis p a lu s tr is C A g r o b a c t e r iu m Z h o n g e t a l., 1 9 9 3
A r a c h is h y p o g a e a B M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t L iv in g t o n e a n d B ir c h , 1 9 9 5
D M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t S in g s it e t a l . , 1 9 9 7
A s p a r a g u s o ffic in a lis C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t C a b r e r a - P o n c e e t a l. , 1 9 9 7
C a la d iu m b ic o lo r B A g r o b a c t e r iu m Li and W u, 1990
C a r y a illin o e n s is D A g r o b a c t e r iu m M c G r a n a h a m e t a l. , 1 9 9 3
C a r ic a p a p a y a B A g r o b a c t e r iu m C a b r e r a - P o n c e e t a l. , 1 9 9 6 ; Ya n g e t a l . , 1 9 9 6
C A g r o b a c t e r iu m C h e n g e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
D M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t F it c h e t a l . , 1 9 9 0
C h r y s a n te m u m B A g r o b a c t e r iu m P a v in g e r o v á e t a l . , 1 9 9 4
C ic e r a r ie tin u m A A g r o b a c t e r iu m R a m a n a e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
C itr u s s p . C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t Ya o e t a l . , 1 9 9 6
C o ffe a c a n e p h o r a D A g r o b a c t e r iu m S p ir a l e t a l . , 1 9 9 3
C u c u m is s a tiv u s B A g r o b a c t e r iu m R a h a r jo e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t S c h u lz e e l a l. , 1 9 9 5
D a tu r a in n o x ia A A g r o b a c t e r iu m D u c r o c q e t a l. , 1 9 9 4
F e s tu c a s p . C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t S p a n g e n b e r g e t a l. , 1 9 9 5
G ly c in e m a x B M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t L iu e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t S t e w a r t e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
Ip o m o e a b a ta t a s B A g r o b a c t e r iu m N e w e ll e t a l . , 1 9 9 5
C A g r o b a c t e r iu m G a m a - M ic s e t a l . , 1 9 9 6
J u g la n s s p . D A g r o b a c t e r iu m M c G r a n a h a n e t a l., 1 9 9 0
L o liu m s p . C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t Ye e t a l. , 1 9 9 7
M a n ih o t e s c u le n t a C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t S c h ö p k e e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
D M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t R a e m a k e r s e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
E A g r o b a c t e r iu m L i e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
M e d ic a g o s a t iv a D A g r o b a c t e r iu m N in k o v ic e t a l . , 1 9 9 5
M e d ic a g o tr u n c u la ta B A g r o b a c t e r iu m C h a b a u t e t a l., 1 9 9 6
O e n a n t h e s t o lo n ife r a D M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t B e e n a n d K im , 1 9 9 5
O r y z a s a tiv a C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t L i e t a l . , 1 9 9 7 ; N a y a k e t a l. , 1 9 9 7 ; J a in e t a l . , 1 9 9 6 b
P a n a x g in s e n g B A g r o b a c t e r iu m L e e e t a l. , 1 9 9 5
P ic e a s p . C A g r o b a c t e r iu m D r a k e e t a l. , 1 9 9 7
D M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t C h a r e s t e t a l . , 1 9 9 6 ; B o m m in e n i e t a l . , 1 9 9 7
P ru n n u s sp. B A g r o b a c t e r iu m S c o r z a e t a l., 1 9 8 9
C A g r o b a c t e r iu m D a C a m a r a - M a c h a d o e t a l. , 1 9 9 5
R o s a h y b r id a B A g r o b a c t e r iu m v a n d e r S a lm e t a l . , 1 9 9 7
S a c ch a ru m C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t S n y m a n e t a l. , 1 9 9 6
o f fic in a r u m
S o la n u m m e lo n g e n a B A g r o b a c t e r iu m F a r i e t a l., 1 9 9 5
S o rg h u m s p. B M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t C a s a s e t a l., 1 9 9 3
V itis s p . C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t K ik k e r t e t a l . , 1 9 9 6
C A g r o b a c t e r iu m N a k a n o e t a l., 1 9 9 4 ; M a u r o e t a l., 1 9 9 5
Z ea m ays C M ic r o b o m b a r d m e n t Z h o n g e t a l., 1 9 9 6
not eliminate somaclonal variation but could be applied however in some species somatic embryos seem to
in more species. be sensitive to the selective agents usually used to
C) Transformation of embryogenic cell culture and detect transformed cells, as for example in cassava
regeneration via indirect somatic embryogenesis. (Schöpke et al., 1993), and regeneration through
Transformation of cultured cells is easier than of secondary somatic embryogenesis is not easy. Li et
explants and plant regeneration is faster. al. (1996) proposed a method combining somatic
D) Transformation of somatic embryos and regeneration embryogenesis and organogenesis: secondary
through secondar y or indirect somatic somatic embryos were transformed using
embryogenesis. Somatic embryos seem to be easily Agrobacterium infection and transgenic plants were
transformed. Transformed embr yos could be regenerated via organogenesis after cycles of
regenerated by secondary somatic embryogenesis secondary somatic embryogenesis.
or by producing embryogenic calli or cell cultures. A
comparison of both methods in Oenanthe stolonifera Most of the reports on regeneration of genetically
have shown that the second method gives higher transformed plants correspond to tests or optimizations
transformation efficiencies (Been & Kim, 1995). of the methods using either genes conferring resistance
E) Transformation of somatic embryos, proliferation to antibiotics or reporter genes. However, some practical
through secondary embryogenesis and regeneration experiments have been yet made using different types
through organogenesis. Secondary embryogenesis of transgenes, especially with disease resistance genes
provides great quantities of easily transformed cells, (Table 2).
TABLE 2- Species genetically transformed using somatic embryogenesis with genes of agricultural interest.
Papaya Gene encoding the Papaya Ringspot Virus coat protein Cheng et al., 1996
Peanut Bacillus thuringensis insecticide crystal protein (cryIAc) gene Singsit et al., 1997
Rice Bacillus thuringensis insecticide crystal protein (cryIAc) gene Nayak et al., 1997
Soybean Synthetic Bacillus thuringensis insecticide crystal protein (cryIAc) gene Stewart et al., 1996
Soybean Gene encoding a mammalian stearyl CoA delta 9 desa-turase Liu et al., 1996
Sweet potato Trypsin inhibitor and lectin genes Newell et al., 1995
Somatic hybrid regeneration problems and also allows new combinations of nuclear
Crosses of cultivated species with wild type and organelle DNA, but a plant regeneration system is
relatives are a potential source of genetic variability for first required. The regeneration of fused protoplasts can
plant genetic improvement (Glimelius et al., 1991). be done via organogenesis or via somatic
However, their utilization in many species is limited embryogenesis. As has been mentioned previously,
because such crosses can not be made. Moreover, the somatic embr yogenesis has the advantage of
regeneration of somatic hybrids could be difficult in some regenerating plants from single cells, and for these
species, even using embryo rescue techniques. The reason it is the selected regeneration method in many
protoplast fusion technique overcomes part of these somatic hybridization projects (Table 3).
TABLE 3- Somatic hybrids in which somatic embryogenesis has been used in their production.
SPECIES REFERENCES
Homozygous and polyploid line production problems, for example by maintaining long-term
embryogenic calli or cell-suspension cultures. However,
Somatic embryogenesis can produce spontaneous maintenance of cell cultures by subculture is time
polyploidy in the regenerated plants, as has been consuming and expensive, and involves the risk of loss
observed in melon ( Cucumis melo) and Iochroma of valuable materials through contaminations or human
warscewiczii (Canhoto et al., 1990; Ezura and Oosawa, or technical errors. Additional problems of long-term cell
1994). The application of colchicine or the cultures include the risk of genetic changes by somaclonal
anti-microtubular drug amiprophos-methyl in the variation and decreases in the plant regeneration capacity
embryogenic medium enhances the number of polyploid and in the viability of the regenerated plants (Fitch &
embryos produced (Gmitter et al., 1991; Binarova and Moore, 1993). The frequent initiation of new embryogenic
Dolezel, 1993). Triploid plants can be regenerated when cell cultures can reduce the adverse effects on genetic
somatic embryogenesis is performed using endosperm fidelity and regeneration potential but is expensive and
as explant as have been observed in Prunnus persica time consuming. Moreover, the initiation of new cultures
(Liu and Liu, 1980), Citrus (Gmitter et al., 1990) and could be particularly difficult in some species in which
Acacia nilotica (Garg et al., 1996). the establishment of embryogenic cell cultures have
It is also possible to regenerate plants from haploid proven to be complicated or in which the embryogenic
explants (microspores) via somatic embryogenesis. explants are only available during short periods of the
However, haploid plant regeneration from anthers year.
(androgenesis) or ovules (gynogenesis) through embryo However, some alternatives exist. The manipulation
formation is not considered as somatic embryogenesis required for cell culture maintenance can be reduced by
in sensu stricto (Raghavan, 1983) and for this reason maintaining the cultures at low temperatures (0-10°C)
we are not going to treat this subject. The combination (Attree & Fowke, 1993; Janeiro et al., 1995). It is also
of haploid plant production with chromosome doubling possible to reduce manipulation by growing cell cultures
techniques has been used to obtain homozygous plants in hermetic flasks at room temperature (Joy et al., 1991).
in a single generation (Gudu et al., 1993; Zhao & The loss of embryogenic potential can be partially
Simmonds, 1995). reduced by the application of exogenous spermidine
(Bajaj & Rajam, 1995). In addition, the establishment of
Germplasm preservation long-term cell cultures in hormone-free media could
The storage of seeds in dry and cold conditions reduce the risk of somaclonal variations. Long-term
offers a convenient method for long-term storage of the embryogenic cell-lines cultured on hormone-free medium
germplasm. However, the seeds of some species not have been described in some species, including
can not be stored at low temperatures or are not asparagus (Delbreil et al ., 1994), carrot (Smith &
desiccation-tolerant. Moreover, some crop species are Krikorian, 1989), grape (Gray, 1992) and Hevea
only propagated vegetatively, causing additional brasilensis (Cailloux et al., 1996). However, cell culture
preservation problems. Plant cell in vitro culture on hormone-free medium reduces somaclonal variation
technology provides a potential solution for these but not the amont of manipulation or the loss of
concentration, reducing the possible toxicity of any one anthers and ovaries of plants infected with GFLV and
of them (Fretz et al., 1992; Wang et al., 1994). A typical various GLR viruses. These calli were heat shock treated
cryoprotectant solution contains DMSO (5-10 %), sorbitol (35°C) and somatic embryos were successfully produced
or sucrose (0.33-0.5 M), and glycerol (2 M). and converted into plants. Regenerated plants were
During cryopreservation, free radicals and activated tested using immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM)
oxygen can be generated (Benson & Noroncha-Dutra, and serological tests (ELISA) and the results indicated
1988), both highly toxic for the cells. The presence during that somatic embryogenesis in combination with heat
freezing of anti-oxidants such as ascorbic acid enhances therapy is an effective procedure to eliminate viruses.
the rates of cell survival (Fuller et al., 1988; Fretz & Lörz, Curiously, sometimes elimination success depended on
1995). the explant used. For example, using the same somatic
The conventional freezing method for cryopreserved embryogenesis/heat shock treatment, GFLV virus is
plant material is a two-step procedure in which a first eliminated if the somatic embryos were originated from
step consists in a slow cooling (0,5-1°C/min) to an ovary explants but not if they were originated from
intermediate temperature (usually about -40°C), and a anthers.
second step consisting in a rapid cooling in liquid Strandberg (1993) compared the efficiency in the
nitrogen. This system has been successfully applied to elimination of the yellow-flecked mottled leaves virus in
many species including Panicum maximum, Penisetum Ophiopogon japonicus using meristem and somatic
maximum and maize (Shillito et al ., 1989; embryo plant regeneration without heat shock treatment.
Gnanapragasam and Vasil, 1992). However, this system All plants regenerated from somatic embryos appeared
has an important problem: the necessity of an expensive to be virus-free. In contrast, only about one-third of the
controlled programmable freezing machine. Some plants regenerated from meristems appeared to be virus-
alternative method have been developed succesfully as, free.
for example, the one-step vitrification method (Reinhoud This method has also been succesfully used in Citrus.
et al., 1995; Ishikawa et al., 1996), or a rapid freezing at Somatic embryos were obtained from stylar tissues of
-25°C and transference to liquid nitrogen (Jain et al., lemon plants of different cultivars affected by various
1996a). virus-like diseases. Plants regenerated from the somatic
The post-thaw treatment of cryopreserved cells is also embryos gave negative results when assayed for the
important for the survival and re-growth of the plant presence of viruses, virus-like agents, and viroids
material (Lynch et al., 1994). A rapid thawing at 40-45°C (d‘Onghia et al., 1997).
is usually used. Not removing the cryoprotectant solution
Metabolite Production
does not seem to affect recovery rates significantly
(Gnanapragasam & Vasil, 1990; Wang et al., 1994). The production of metabolites in traditional agriculture
Supporting thawed cells on filter paper has been shown is based on the culture of large quantities of plants,
to increase re-growth frequencies (Meijer et al., 1991; collection of certain organs or tissues that accumulate
Benson et al., 1992; Lynch et al, 1994). The time required the product, and a chemical extraction. Sometimes the
to recover cryopreserved cells depends on the material product is only accumulated in very specific parts of the
and method used. For example, a 2 month period have plants such fruits, seeds, flowers or embryos and
been reported for cultured cells of Festuca, Lolium, and sometimes very large quantities of plants are necessary
maize (Shillito et al., 1989; Wang et al., 1994), and 8-35 for the production of small quantities of metabolite.
days for rice (Meijer et al., 1991). Metabolite production in cell cultures has been proposed
Using a suitable method, it was possible to recover as an alternative for traditional methods. Some success
plant cells with nearly the same regeneration rates than has been reported with these techniques (Fujita & Tabata,
for non-frozen controls, independently of the time of 1987) but sometimes the undifferentiated cultured cells
storage in liquid nitrogen (Nishizawa et al., 1993). For does not accumulate the metabolite, or the metabolite is
example, after more than 4 years, frozen suspended cells accumulated only in low quantities. The addition of
and cotton callus showed normal morphology after precursors or elicitors can increase metabolite production
thawing and high growth and regeneration rates (Luckner & Diettrich, 1987; Eilert et al., 1987), but not
(Rajasekaran et al., 1996). always. Alternatively, organ culture or somatic
embryogenesis, when the products accumulate in the
Virus elimination
embryo, can be used. There are several factors that affect
Somatic embryos have a well-developed vascular the viability of these processes. The most important is
system but this system is not connected to the explant economics. Due to the high price of in vitro culture, the
tissue (Newton & Goussard, 1990). This makes possible metabolites to be produced by plant cell culture must be
the use of somatic embryogenesis as a method to of high economic value. Janick (1993) suggested that
eliminate viruses, combined or not with heat shock suitable metabolites are products of pharmaceutical
treatments (Goussard & Wiid, 1992; Strandberg, 1993). interest such as alkaloids and certain lipids, some flavor
Grapevine GFLV (Grapevine Fan Leaf Virus) and A-, compounds and food additives, and pigments (reviewed
2-, and 3-GLR viruses (Grapevine Leafroll associated by Janick, 1991). Some examples are:
viruses) were eliminated using somatic embryogenesis - Caffeine and theobromine from somatic embryos of
associated with thermotherapy (Goussard et al., 1991; cacao (Janick et al., 1982; Paiva & Janick, 1983).
Goussard & Wiid, 1992). Calli were produced from - Celery flavor compounds from celery somatic embryos
AXTELL, J.D.; BUTLER, L.G.; BRESSAN, R.A. & HASEGAWA, Helianthus annuus x Helianthus tuberosus . Plant Science,
P.M. Transgenic sorghum plants via microprojectile bombardment. 114:205-214, 1996.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, FARI, M.; NAGY, I.; CSANYI, M.; MITYKO, J. & ANDRASFALVY, A.
90:11212-11216, 1993. Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation and plant
CHABAUT, M.; LARSONNEAU, C.; MARMOUGET, C. & HUGUET, T. regeneration via organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from
Transformation of barrel medic ( Medicago trunculata Gaertn.) by cotyledon leaves in eggplant ( Solanum melongena L. cv.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens and regeneration via somatic ‘Kecskemeti lila’). Plant Cell Reports, 15:82-86, 1995.
embryogenesis of transgenic plants with the MtENOD12 nodulin FENG, Q.; STALKER, H.T. & PATTEE, H.E. Plant recovery of self and
promoter fused to the gus reporter gene. Plant Cell Reports, interspecific hybrids of Arachis by in vitro culture of peg tips. Crop
15:305-310, 1996. Science, 36:1660-1666, 1996.
CHAREST, P.J.; DEVANTIER, Y. & LACHANCE, D. Stable genetic FITCH, M.M.M.; MANSHARDT, R.M.; GONSALVES, D. & SLIGHTOM,
transfor mation of Pice marina (black spruce) via par ticle J.L. Stable transformation of papaya via microprojectile
bombardment. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, bombardment. Plant Cell Reports, 9:189-194, 1990.
32:91-99, 1996. FITCH, M.M.M.; MANSHARDT, R.M.; GONSALVES, D. & SLIGHTOM,
CHENG, Y.H.; YANG, J.S. & YEH, S.D. Efficient transformation of J.L. Transgenic papaya plants from Agrobacterium mediated
papaya by coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus mediated transformation of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Reports,
by Agrobacterium following liquid-phase wounding by 12:245-249, 1993.
embryogenic tissues with carborundum. Plant Cell Reports, FOURRÉ, J.L.; BERGER, P.; NIQUET, L. & ANDRE, P. Somatic
16:127-132, 1996. embryogenesis and somaclonal variation in Norway spruce:
DABAUZA, M., ROIG, L.A. & MORENO, V. Selective methods for the morphogenetic, cytogenetic and molecular approaches.
recovery of somatic hybrids of Cucumis melo x C. metuliferus and Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 94:159-169, 1997.
C. sativus x C. metuliferus. Reports on Cucurbitaceae Genetics FRETZ, A.; JAHNE, J. & LÖRZ, H. Cryopreservation of embryogenic
Cooperation, 14:81-84, 1991. suspension cultures of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) Botanica
DA CAMARA MACHADO, A.; PUSCHMANN, M.; PUHRINGER, H.; Acta, 105:140-145, 1992.
KREMEN, R.; KATINGER, H. & LAIMIER DA CAMARA FRETZ, A. & LORZ, H. Cryopreservation of in vitro cultures of barley
MACHADO, M. Somatic embryogenesis of Prunnus subhirtella (Hordeum vulgare L. and H. murinum L.) and transgenic cells of
autumno rosa and regeneration of transgenic plants after wheat (Triticum aestivium L.). Journal of Plant Physiology,
Agrobacterium -mediated transformation. Plant Cell Reports, 146:489-496, 1995.
14:333-340, 1995. FUJITA, Y. & TABATA, M. Secondary metabolites from plant cells.
DALLAIRE, S.; HOUDE, M.; GAGNE, Y.; SAINI, S.; BOILEAU, N.; Pharmaceutical applications and progress in commercial
CHEVRIER, N. & SARHAN, F. ABA and low temperature induces production. In: GREEN, C.E.; SOMERS, D.A.; HACKETT, W.P. &
freezing tolerance via distinct regulatory pathways in wheat. Plant BIESBOER, D.D. (Eds.) Plant Tissue and Cell Culture. New York,
Cell Reports, 35:1-9, 1994. Alan R Liss, 1987. p.169-185.
DELBREIL, B.; GOEBEL-TOURAND, I.; LEFRANÇOIS, C. & JULLIEN, FULLER, B.J.; GOWER, J.D. & GREEN, C.J. Free radical damage
M. Isolation and characterisation of long-term embryogenic lines and organ preservation: fact or fiction. Cryobiology, 25:377-393,
in Asparagus officinalis L. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144:194- 1988.
200, 1994. GABR, M.F. In vitro production of jojoba liquid wax from somatic
DENG, X.X.; GROSSER, J.W. & GMITTER, F.G. Intergeneric somatic embryos proliferated via vegetative tissues. Egyptian Journal of
hybrid plants from protoplast fusion of Fortunella crassifolia cultivar Horticulture, 20:135-144, 1993.
‘Meiwa’ with Citrus sinensis cultivar ‘Valencia’. Scientia GAMA-MICS; LEITE, R.P.; CORDEIRO, A.R. & CANTLIFFE, D.J.
Horticulturae, 49:55-62, 1992. Transgenic sweet potato plants obtained by Agrobacterium
DODEMAN, V.L.; DUCREUX, G. & KREIS, M. Zygotic embryogenesis tumefaciens mediated transformation. Plant Cell Tissue and
versus somatic embryogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany, Organ Culture, 46:237-244, 1996.
48:1493-1509, 1997. GARG, L.; BHANDARI, N.N.; RANI, V. & BHOJWANI, S.S. Somatic
D’ONGHIA, A.M.; DE PASCUALE, F.; CARIMI, F.; SAVINO, V. & embryogenesis and regeneration of triploid plants in endosperm
CRESCIMANNO, F.G. Somatic embryogenesis from style culture cultures of Acacia nilotica. Plant Cell Reports, 15:855-858, 1996.
as a possible means for virus elimination in Citrus. Journal GLIMELIUS, K.; FAHLESSON, J.; LANDGREN, M.; SJÖDIN, C. &
Phytopathology, 145:77-79, 1997. SUNDBERG, E. Gene transfer via somatic hybridisation in plants.
DRAKE, P.M.W.; JOHN, A.; POWER, J.B. & DAVEY, M.R. Expression Trends in Biotechnology, 9:24-30, 1991.
of the gus a gene in embryogenic cell lines of sitka spruce following GMITTER, F.G. jr.; LING, X.B. & DENG, X.X. Induction of triploid Citrus
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Journal of Experimental plants from endosperm calli in vitro. Theoretical and Applied
Botany, 48:151-155, 1997. Genetics, 80:785-790, 1990.
DUCROCQ, C.; SANGWAN, R.S. & SANGWAN-NORREEL, B.S. GMITTER, F.G. jr.; LING, X.B.; CAI, C.Y. & GROSSER, J.W.
Production of Agrobacterium-mediated transgenic fertile plants Colchicine-induced polyploidy in Citrus embryogenic cultures,
by direct somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos somatic embryos, and regenerated plantlets. Plant Science,
of Datura innoxia. Plant Molecular Biology, 25:995-1009, 1994. 74:135-141, 1991.
DUMET, D.; ENGELMANN, F.; CHABRILLANGE, N. & DUVAL, Y. GNANAPRAGASAM, S. & VASIL, I.K. Plant regeneration from a
Cryopreservation of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) somatic cryopreserved embryogenic cell suspension of a commercial
embryos involving a desiccation step. Plant Cell Reports, sugarcane hybrid ( Saccharum sp.). Plant Cell Reports,
12:352-355, 1993 9:419-423, 1990.
EILERT, U.; KURZ, W.G.W. & CONSTABEL, F. Alkaloid accumulation GNANAPRAGASAM, S. & VASIL, I.K. Cryopreservation of immature
in plant cell cultures upon treatment with elicitors. In: GREEN, C.E.; embryos, embryogenic callus and cell suspension cultures of
SOMERS, D.A.; HACKETT, W.P. & BIESBOER, D.D. (Eds.) Plant gramineous species. Plant Science, 83:205-215, 1992.
Tissue and Cell Culture. New York, Alan R Liss, 1987. p.213- GORDON-KAMM, W.J.; SPENCER, T.M.; MANGANO, M.L.; ADAMS,
219. T.R. & LEMAUX, P.G. Transformation of maize cells and
EZURA, H. & OOZAWA, K. Ploidy of somatic embryos and the ability regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell, 2:603-618,
to regenerate plantlets in melon (Cucumis melo L). Plant Cell 1990.
Reports, 14:107-111, 1994. GOUSSARD, P.G.; WIID, J. & KASDORF, G.G.F. The effectiveness of
EZURA, H.; AMAGAI, H.; KIKUTA, I.; KUBOTA, M. & OOSAWA, K. in vitro somatic embryogenesis in eliminating fanleaf virus and
Selection of somaclonal variants with low-temperature leafroll associated viruses from grapevines. South African
germinability in melon (Cucumis melo L.) Plant Cell Reports, Journal of Enololgy and Viticulture, 12:77-81, 1991.
14:684-688, 1995. GOUSSARD, P.G. & WIID, J. The elimination of fanleaf virus from
FAMBRINI, M.; CIONINI, G. & PUGLIESI, C. Development of somatic grapevines using in vitro somatic embryogenesis combined with
embryos from morphogenetic cells of the interspecific hybrid heat therapy. South African Journal of Enololgy and Viticulture,
McGRANAHAN, G.H.; LESLIE, C.A.; DANDEKAR, A.M.; URATSU, S.L. somatic embryogenesis and applications in plant breeding.
& YATES, I.E. Transformation of pecan and regeneration of transgenic Euphytica, 81:93-107, 1995.
plants. Plant Cell Reports, 12:634-638, 1993. RAEMAKERS, C.J.J.M.; SOFIARI, E.; TAYLOR, N.; HENSHAW, G.;
MEIJER, E.G.M.; van IREN, F.; SCHRIJNEMAKERS, E.; HENSGENS, JACOBSEN, E. & VISSER, R.G.F. Production of transgenic cas-
L.A.M.; van ZIJDERVELD, M. & SCHILPEROORT, R.A. Retention sava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) plants by particle bombardment
of the capacity to produce plants from protoplasts in cryopreserved using luciferase activity as selection marker. Molecular Breeding,
cell lines of rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Reports, 10:171- 2:339-349, 1996.
174, 1991. RAGHAVAN, V. Biochemistry of somatic embryogenesis. In: EVANS,
MENDIS, M.H.; POWER, J.B. & DAVEY, M.R. Somatic hybrids of the D.A.; SHARP, W.R.; AMMIRATO, P.V. & YAMADA, Y. (Eds.)
forage legumes Medicago sativa L. and M. falcata L. Journal of Handbook of Plant Cell Culture: Techniques for propagation and
Experimental Botany, 42:1565-1573, 1991. Breeding. New York, Macmillan, 1983. v.1, p.655-671.
MU, S.K.; FRASSER, L.G. & HARVEY, C.F. Initiation of callus and RAHARJO, S.H.T.; HERNANDEZ, M.O.; ZHANG, Y.Y. & PUNJA, Z.K.
regeneration of plantlets from endosperm of Actinidia interspecific Transformation of pickling cucumber with chitinase-encoding
hybrids. Scientia Horticulturae, 44:107-117, 1990. genes using Agrobacterium tumefacienns. Plant Cell Reports,
MYCOCK, D.J.; WESLEY-SMITH, J. & BERJAK, P. Cryopreservation 15:591-596, 1996.
of somatic embryos of four species with and without cryoprotectant RAJASEKARAN, K. Regeneration of plants from cryopreserved
pre-treatment. Annals of Botany, 75:331-336, 1995. embryogenic cell suspension and callus cultures of cotton
NAKANO, M.; HOSHINO, Y. & MII, M. Regeneration of transgenic plants (Gossypium hirsutum L). Plant Cell Reports, 15:859-864, 1996.
of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) via Agrobacterium rhizogenes- RAMANA, R.V.; VENU, C.; JAYASREE, T. & SADANADAM, A. Direct
mediated transformation of embryogenic calli. Journal of somatic embryogenesis and transformation in Cicer arietinum L.
Experimental Botany, 45:649-656, 1994. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 34:716-718, 1996.
NAYAK, P.; BASU, D.; DAS, S.; BASU, A.; GHOSH, D.; REDENBAUGH, K.; VISS, P.; SLADE, D. & FUJII, J.A. Scale-up: artifi-
RAMAKRISHNAN, N.A.; GHOSH, M. & SEN S.K. Transgenic elite cial seeds. In: GREEN, C.E.; SOMERS, D.A.; HACKET, W.P. &
indica rice plants expressing CryIAc ð-endotoxin of Bacillus BIESBOER, D.D. (Eds.) Plant Tissue and Cell Culture. New York,
thuringiensis are resistant against yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga Alan R. Liss Inc., 1987a, p.473-493.
incertulas). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences REDENBAUGH, K. (Ed.) Synseeds. Boca Raton FL, CRC Press, 1993
of the USA, 94:2111-2116, 1997. REINHOUD, P.J.; SCHRIJNEMAKERS, E.W.M.; van IREN, F. & KIJNE,
NEWELL, C.A.; LOWE, J.M.; MERRYWEATHER, A.; ROOKE, L.M. & J.W. Vitrification and heat-shock treatment improve
HAMILTON, W.D.O. Transformation of sweet potato (Ipomoea ba- cryopreservation of tobacco cell suspensions compared to two-
tatas (L.) Lam.) with Agrobacterium tumefaciens and regeneration step freezing. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 42:261-267,
of plants expressing cowpea trypsin inhibitor and drop lectin. Plant 1995.
Science, 107:215-227, 1995. SCHÖPKE, C.; FRANCHE, C.; BOGUSZ, D.; CHAVARRIAGA, P.;
NEWTON, D.J. & GOUSSARD, P.G. The ontogeny of somatic embryos FAUQUET, C.M. & BEACHY, R.N. Transformation in cassava
from in vitro cultured grapevine anthers. South African Journal (Manihot esulenta Crantz). In: BAJAJ, Y.P.S. (Ed.) Biotechnology
of Enology and Viticulture, 11:70-75, 1990. in Agriculture and Forestry. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1993, p.273-
NINKOVIC, S.; MILJUS-DJUKIC, J. & NESKOVIC, M. Genetic 289.
transformation of alfalfa somatic embryos and their clonal SCHÖPKE, C.; TAYLOR, N.; CÁRCAMO, R.; DA KOFFI-KONAN, N.;
propagation through repetitive somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, MARMEY, P.; HENSHAW, G.G.; BEACHY, R.N. & FAUQUET, C.
Tissue and Organ Culture, 42:255-260, 1995. Regeneration of transgenic cassava plants (Manihot esculenta
NISHIZAWA, S.; SAKAI, A.; AMANO, Y. & MATSUZAWA, T. Crantz) from microbombarded embryogenic suspension cultures.
Cryopreservation of asparagus ( Asparagus officinalis L.) Nature Biotechnology, 14:731-735, 1996.
embryogenic suspension cells and subsequent plant regeneration SCHULZE, J.; BALKO, C.; ZELLNER, B.; KOPREK, T.; HANSCH, R.;
by vitrification. Plant Science, 91:67-73, 1993. NERLICH, A. & MENDEL, R.R. Biolistic transformation of cucumber
NYANGE, N.E.; WILLIAMSON, B. ; McNICOL, R.J. ; LYON, G.D. & using embryogenic suspension cultures: Long-term expression
HACKETT, C.A. In vitro selection of Coffea arabica callus for of reporter genes. Plant Science, 112:197-206, 1995.
resistance to partially purified phytotoxic culture filtrates from SCORZA, R.; CORDTS, J.M.; MANTE, S.; CALLAHAN, A.M.;
Colletotrichum kahawae. Annals of Applied Biology, 127:425- MORGENS, P. & COHEN, R. The development of regeneration
439, 1995. and transformation systems for peach. Acta Horticulturae 254:19-
ONISHI, N.; SAKAMOTO, Y. & HIROSAWA, T. Synthetic seed as an 23, 1989.
application of mass production of somatic embryos. Plant Cell, SHILLITO, R.O.; CARSWELL, G.K.; JOHNSON, C.M. & DiMAIO, J.J.
Tissue and Organ Culture, 39:137-145, 1994. Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of elite inbred plants.
OROPEZA, M. & De GRACIA, E. (1996) Somaclonal variants resistant Bio/Technology, 7:581-587, 1989
to sugarcane mosaic virus and their agronomic characterisation. SHINOZAKI, S.; FUJITA, K.; HIDAKA, T. & OMURA, M. Plantlet
In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 32:26-30, 1996. formation of somatic hybrids of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis)
OZAWA, K.; LING, D.H. & KOMAMINE, A. High frequency somatic and its wild relative, orange Jessamine (Murraya paniculata), by
embryogenesis from small suspension cultured clusters of cells electrically-induced protoplast fusion. Japanese Journal of
of an interspecific hybrid of Oryza. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Breeding, 42:287-295, 1992.
Culture, 46:157-159, 1996. SINGSIT, C.; ADANG, M.J.; LYNCH, R.E.; ANDERSON, W.F.; WANG,
PAIVA, M. & JANICK, J. In vivo and in vitro production of alkaloids in A.; CARDINEAU, G. & OZIAS-AKINS, P. Expression of a Bacillus
Theobroma cacao L. Acta Horticulturae, 131:249-273, 1983. thuringensis cryIA(c) gene in transgenic peanut plants and its
PAVINGEROVA, D.; DOSTAL, J.; BISKOVA, R. & BENETKA, V. Somatic efficacy against lesser cornstalk borer. Transgenic Research,
embryogenesis and Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of 6:169-176, 1997.
chrysanthemum. Plant Science, 97: 95-101, 1994. SMITH, D.L. & KRIKOVIAN, A.D. Release of somatic embryogenic
PIOLA, F.; ROHR, R. & VONADERKAS, P. Controlled mycorrhizal potential from excised zygotic embryos of carrot and maintenance
initiation as a means to improve root development in somatic of proembryogenic cultures in hormone-free medium. American
embryo plantlets of hybrid larch (Larix x eurolepis). Physiologia Journal of Botany, 76:1832-1843, 1989.
Plantarum, 95:575-580, 1995. SNYMAN, S.J.; MEYER, G.M.; CARSON, D.L. & BOTHA, F.C.
POMEROY, K.; BROWN, D.C.W. & TAKAHATA, Y. Response of Brassica Establishment of embr yogenic callus and transient gene
napus L. microspore-derived embryos to exogenous abscisic acid expression in selected sugarcane varieties. South African
desiccation. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, Journal of Botany, 62:151-154, 1996.
30:196-203, 1994. SPANGENBERG, G.; WANG, Z.Y.; WU, X.L.; NAGEL, J.; IGLESIAS,
QUINN, J.; SIMON, J.E. & JANICK, J. Recovery of gamma-linolenic V.A. & POTRYKUS, I. Transgenic tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea)
acid from somatic embryos of borage. Journal of the American and red fescue (F. rubra) plants from microprojectile bombardment
Society of Horticultural Sciences, 114:511-515, 1989. of embryogenic suspension cells. Journal of Plant Physiology,
RAEMAKERS, C.J.J.M.; JACOBSEN, E. & VISSER, R.G.F. Secondary 145:693-701, 1995.
SPIRAL, J.; THIERRY, C.; PAILLARD, M. & PETIARD, V. Regeneration by double-antibiotic resistance. Plant Cell Reports, 15:506-511,
of plantlets of Coffee canephora Pierre (Robusta) transformed by 1996
Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Comptes Rendus a l’Academie des WANG, Z.Y.; LEGRIS, G.; NAGEL, J.; POTRYKUS, I. &
Sciences, Série III, 316:1-6, 1993. SPANGENBERG, G. Cryopreservation of embryogenic cell
STEWART, C.N.Jr.; ADANG, M.J.; ALL, J.N.; BOERMA, H.R.; suspension in Festuca and Lolium species. Plant Science,
CARDINEAU, G.; TUCKER, D. & PARROT, W.A. Genetic 103:903-106, 1994.
transformation, recovery, and characterisation of fertile soybean WANN, S.R. & GOLDNER, W.R. Induction of somatic embryogenesis
transgenic for a synthetic Bacillus thuringensis cryIAc gene. Plant in Taxus, and the production of taxane-ring containing alkaloids
Physiology 112:121-129, 1996. thereform. WO Patent N° 93/19585, 1994.
STRANDBERG, J.O. Meristem culture of Ophiopogon japonicus and WHIPKEY, A.; SIMON, J.E. & JANICK, J. In vivo and in vitro lipid
production of embryo-like structures. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ accumulation in Borago officinalis L. Journal of the American
Culture, 32:277-282, 1993. Oil Chemistry Society, 65:979-984, 1988.
TABAEIZADEH, Z.; FERL, R.J. & VASIL, I.K. Somatic hybridization in WILLIAMS, E.G. & MAHESWARAN G. Somatic embryogenesis:
the Gramineae: Saccharum officinarum L. (sugarcane) and factors influencing coordinated behaviour of cells as an
Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum. Proceedings of the embryogenic group. Annals of Botany, 57:443-462, 1986
National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 83:5616-5619, 1986. YANG, J.S.; YU, T.A.; CHENG, Y.H. & YEH, S.D. Transgenic papaya
TESSEREAU, H.; FLORIN, B.; MESCHINE, M.C.; THIERRY, C. & plants from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of petioles of
PETIARD, V. Cryopreservation of somatic embryos: A tool for in vitro propagated multishoots. Plant Cell Reports, 15:459-464,
germplasm storage and commercial delivery of selected plants. 1996.
Annals of Botany, 74:547-555, 1994. YAO, J.L.; WU, J.H.; GLEAVE, A.P. & MORRIS, B.A.M. Transformation
TETU, T.; SANGWAN, R.S. & SANGWAN-NORREEL, B.S. Direct of citrus embryogenic cells using particle bombardment and
somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis in cultured immature production of transgenic embryos. Plant Science, 113:175-183,
zygotic embryos of Pisum sativum L. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1996.
137:102-109, 1990. YE, X.; WANG, Z.Y.; WU, X.; POTRYKUS, I. & SPANGENBERG, G.
TOONEN, M.A.J. & DE VRIES, S.C. Initiation of somatic embryos from Transgenic italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum ) plants from
single cells. In: WANG, T.L. & CUMING, A. (Eds.) Embryogenesis: microprojectile bombardment of embryogenic suspension cells.
the generation of a plant. Oxford UK, Bios Scientific , 1996. p.173- Plant Cell Reports, 16:379-384, 1997.
189. ZHAO, J.P. & SIMMONDS, D.H. Application of trifluralin to embryogenic
URAGAMI, A. Cryopreservation of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis microspore cultures to generate doubled haploid plants in Brassica
L.) cultured in vitro. Research Bulletin of the Hokkaido National napus. Physiologia Plantarum, 95:304-309, 1995.
Agricultural Experimental Station, 156:1-37, 1991. ZHONG, H.; BOLYARD, M.G.; SRINIVASAN, C. & STICKLEM, M.B.
VAN DER SALM, T.P.M.; VAN DER TOORN, C.J.G.; BOUWER, R.; Transgenic plants of turfgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) from
TENCATE, C.H.H. & DONS, H.J.M. Production of rol gene microprojectile bombardment of embryogenic callus. Plant Cell
transformed plants of Rosa hybrida L and characterisation of their Reports, 13:1-6, 1993.
rooting ability. Molecular Breeding, 3:39-47, 1997. ZHONG, H.; ZHANG, S.; WARKENTIN, D.; SUN, B.; WU, T.; WU, R. &
VASIL, I. Automation of plant propagation. Plant Cell, Tissue, Organ STICKLEN, M.B. Analysis of the functional activity of the 1.4-kb
Culture, 39:105-108, 1994. 5'-region of the rice actin 1 gene in stable transgenic plants of
VAZQUEZ-THELLO, A.; YANG, L.J.; HIDAKA, M. & UOZUMI, T. maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Science, 116:73-84, 1996.
Inherited chilling tolerance in somatic hybrids of transgenic ZIMMERMANN, J.L. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early
Hibiscus Rosa sinensis x transgenic Lavatera thuringiaca selected development in higher plants. The Plant Cell, 5:1411-1423, 1993.