Experimental Investigation On The Performance of An Improved Equal Channel Angular Pressing Die
Experimental Investigation On The Performance of An Improved Equal Channel Angular Pressing Die
Experimental Investigation On The Performance of An Improved Equal Channel Angular Pressing Die
1. Introduction
In the last four decades, researchers studied predominantly aluminium alloys in Equal
Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP). ECAP was developed by Vladimir Segal and his co-
workers in 1977. This process imposes large plastic strain on the material by simple shear.
The most important advantage of SPD processes is to produce high strength materials. In
ECAP considerable grain refinement occurs without any dimensional changes of the sample.
High yield strength is possible to obtain by ECAP through the Hall Petch relation [2,3]. The
aluminium alloy AA6082 is a high strength and good corrosion resistance material among the
6xxx series. In many applications 6082 alloys are used instead of 6061 alloys, generally in
structural applications [4,5]. Different ECAP die configurations were proposed in [6-8]. Segal
et al. [6] developed a new die assembly especially for high strength and brittle alloy materials.
In that die the ingoing extrusion channel has two walls opposite to each other which move
together with the sample during extrusion, thus a reduction in friction is achieved. At the
same time, the bottom plate of the outgoing channel also has a moving wall which further
reduces the friction. Semiatin et al. [6] also developed moving walls on the basis of Segal's
work of 1995. Mathieu et al. [1] developed another design in which the sample is simply
inserted into the punch so that there are three walls which move together with the sample in
the ingoing channel. This die configuration is adopted in the present work. Fig. 1 shows the
conventional die and Fig. 2 the modified die designed similar to [1] available in our
laboratory.
2. Die design
The modified die design was originally developed by Mathieu et al. [1] and shown in
Fig. 2. The main objective of this die design is to minimize the friction of the sample with the
die walls. The new die is composed of two parts, one is the punch which contains the sample,
and the other part is the fixed one, see Fig. 3a. The experimental realization is shown in Fig.
3b. The lower part of the fixed die has a small platform which is equal to the cross sectional
area of the specimen. The sample is turning on that surface during extrusion. The specimen is
placed inside the punch and surrounded by three lateral sides of the plunger. Only one side of
the sample is in contact with the fix die. After an extrusion process, the fixed die can be split
and the specimen can be removed. Another new sample can be also used to eject the first
sample.
Fig.3. (a) Schematic diagram of the new die; (b) The experimental die
3. Experimental details
The as-received Al6082 alloy was annealed at 4500C for 1 hour and then furnace
cooled. The specimens were machined from the annealed rod with the dimensions of 25 x 25
mm × 80 mm for conventional die and 22.15 mm × 22.15 mm × 80 mm for new die. The
specimens were pressed at room temperature with a ram speed of 1mm/s using a 100 ton
hydraulic press. Molybdenum disulfide was used as lubricant for reducing friction between
the work piece and die inner wall. In the new ECAP die, the load reduction was about 10 to
15 % with respect to the conventional die.
For tensile testing, specimens were prepared from the ECAP samples as per the
ASTM E-8 standards with a diameter of 6 mm and a gage length of 24 mm. The testing was
carried out using a 30 kN Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. 3 tests were
carried out for each condition. The micro hardness was measured using a Wilson Wolpert
hardness tester with a load of 0.3 Kg and the dwell time of 15 s. X-ray diffraction (XRD)
analysis were also carried out on the extruded samples. From the XRD peak patterns, the
crystalline size (D) and the internal elastic strain of the material (ε) were measured.
Fig. 5. Tensile strength vs no. of passes Fig. 6. Percentage of elongation (till failure) vs no. of
passes
Fig. 5 shows the tensile test results obtained for both dies. The tensile yield strength is
increasing gradually as a function of ECAP passes for both dies. The tendencies are very
similar to those observed for the hardness measurements in Table 1.
Fig. 6 shows the percentage of elongation in tensile testing up to failure. The values
are very similar for all conditions. Furthermore, as expected, the higher yield stress material
shows smaller ductility.
Fig. 7 shows the XRD patterns measured for our aluminium 6082 alloy processed
through the conventional and new ECAP dies. The crystalline size (D) was determined using
the Williamson-Hall (WH) method. The initial crystalline size was 150 nm. The initial line
profile was taken as the base line material.
From the XRD patterns, the individual peaks were analyzed and the the Full Width
Half Maxima (FWHM) were calculated as well as the 2*theta values. From the Williamson-
Hall equation, the βhkl cosθ vs 4sinθ values of all the peaks were obtained. The plotted values
were linearly fitted to calculate the slope and the y-intercept. The slope is the elastic lattice
strain of the material. From the y-intercept values the crystalline size (D) was calculated.
Table 2 shows the results of the measurements. As can be seen, the crystallite size is
systematically smaller for the samples processed by the new die.
The peak broadening is in strong relation with the dislocation density while the
position of the peak is related to the elastic lattice strain. The latter (ε) was obtained between
0.00116 to 0.0018 in the conventional die samples and from 0.0019 to 0.00232 in the samples
of the new die (values are in %). From these results it is clear that the stored dislocation
density and the lattice strain is larger in the new die samples compared to the samples
processed by the conventional die.
Fig. 7. XRD analysis of samples deformed by the conventional (a) and the new die (b)
5. Conclusions
AA6082 alloy was successfully processed by a modified die which was proposed
originally by Mathieu et al. in 2004 [1]. It has been found that the new die is more efficient in
obtaining more plastic strain, higher tensile stress, while there is just a small decrease in
ductility. The XRD peak analysis predicted that the crystallite size was systematically smaller
and the lattice strain higher in all samples processed by the new die. Therefore, the new die
design provides better mechanical and structural properties as a conventional die. These
effects can be attributed to the smaller friction in the new design which permits to obtain
larger plastic strain in the processed samples.
References
[1] Mathieu J, Suwas S, Eberhardt A, Toth L and Moll P 2006 A new design for equal
channel angular extrusion. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 173(1), pp 29-
33.
[2] Valiev Ruslan Z and Langdon Terence G 2006 Principles of equal channel angular
pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement. Progress in Materials Science, 51 (7),
P 881-981.
[3] Shanmugasundaram T, Heilmaier M, Murty B S and Subramanya Sarma V 2010 On the
Hall–Petch relationship in a nanostructured Al–Cu alloy. Materials Science and
Engineering A, 527, pp 7821–7825.
[4] Mahmoud T Abdu, Mahmoud S Soliman, Ehab A El-Danaf, Abdulhakim A Almajid
and Farghalli A Mohamed 2012 Creep characteristics and microstructure in nano-
particle strengthened AA6082. Materials Science and Engineering A, 531, pp 35 –
44.
[5] Olaf Engler and Jurgen Hirsch 2002 Texture control by thermomechanical processing of
AA6xxx Al–Mg–Si sheet alloys for automotive applications—a review. Materials
Science and Engineering A, 336, pp 249–262.
[6] Segal V M, Goforth R E and Hartwig K T 1995 Apparatus and method for deformation
processing of metals, ceramics, Plastics and other materials. US patent No. 5400, pp
633.
[7] SEMIATIN S L, DELO D P and SHELL E B 2000 The effect of material properties and
tooling design on deformation and fracture during equal channel angular extrusion. Acta
mater. 48, pp 1841-1851.
[8] Segal V M 2004 Engineering and commercialization of equal channel angular extrusion
(ECAE). Materials Science and Engineering A 386, p 269–276.
[9] Ehab A El-Danaf and Muneer Baig 2013 High temperature deformation characteristics of
equal channel angular pressed AA6082-T6. Materials Science and Engineering A, 565,
pp 301–307.
[10] Muneer Baig, Ehab El-Danaf and Jabair Ali Mohammad 2014 Thermo-mechanical
responses of an aluminum alloy processed by equal channel angular pressing. Materials
and Design, 57, pp 510–519.
[11] Dadbakhsh S, Karimi Taheri A and Smith C W 2010 Strengthening study on 6082 Al
alloy after combination of aging treatment and ECAP process. Materials Science and
Engineering A, 527, pp 4758–4766.