Keywords: Question-Answer Relationship Strategy, Reading Ability
Keywords: Question-Answer Relationship Strategy, Reading Ability
Keywords: Question-Answer Relationship Strategy, Reading Ability
Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out whether QAR Strategy has
influence towards students’ reading ability. This strategy helped the students to find
out the information from the passage and helped the students to answer the
question based on the passage given. The approach of this research was
quantitative research. In this research, the writer used experimental method. The
population were all students of the eleventh class. The sample was taken by using
Cluster Random Sampling Technique. There were two classes for the sample, first
class was experimental class and the second class was the control class. It consist of
61 students from experimental class and control class. The main technique in
measuring students’ reading ability was multiple choice which consisted of 40 items
test. Each item had four options a,b,c,and d, the score of each item was 2.5. In
calculating the data, the writer used t-test formula. Based on the data analysis, the
writer got the result that 𝐻𝑎 was accepted. It was obtained that 𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 = 5.67, ttable for
α=0.05 was 1.68 and for α=0.01 was 2.42 (5.67>1.68<2.42). So H a was accepted. It
meant that there was significant influence of QAR Strategy towards students’
reading ability of the Eleventh Class of SMA Negeri 14 Bandar Lampung in
2018/2019. The average score of students’ reading ability who was taught through
QAR Strategy was higher than was taught through direct instruction. It was
69.78>53.67. Based on the result above, it is clear that QAR Strategy can improve
students’ reading ability.
1
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
2
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
It means that if we want to doing the learn the language if we spend all our
activities we need language, because time outside of classroom speaking our
language has an important role in own native language.
people’s life. Without language people
can convey what they meant. Based on the theories and explanation
The writer concludes that language is above, the writer concludes that
the most important things and the most teaching English as foreign language
important tool for people in the world. should be done by good English
It can not be separated from people’s teachers. The students do not have
life. With language, people can deliver many opportunities in using English.
their idea, can express their feeling, and Therefore,the teacher has to be the
can communicate to each other. People main model of English. When the
can do their activities well because they teaching process is interested, the
have language and they can students will be enjoy in the classroom.
communicate. On the other hand, teaching English
needs affected by several factors that
The Concept of Teaching English As should be handled appropriately.
Foreign Language
Wallace (1992:7) states that, “English is
The Concept of Reading
being learned as a second or foreign In the daily life, reading skills has an
language ‘language practice’ may take important role. It is facilitating people
the form of reading round the class.” It
to comprehend the written materials.
means that English as foreign language
People can get a lot of information from
is not acquire automatically like first many resources in order to enhance
language or mother tongue. The second their knowledge by reading. By reading,
language or foreign language have to be
people can enhance their knowledge,
learned in the classroom.
people will get knowledge or
information as much as they want to
Brown (2001:116) states that “Foreign read.
language contexts are those in which
students do not have ready-made
Alderson (2000:28) states that
context for communication beyond
“Reading is an enjoyable, intense,
their classroom.” It means that to private activity in which the readers get
master English, students have to use much pleasure and can totally absorb
English not only in the classroom. They
the reading.” It means that by reading,
may use English to communicate to
people can get many informations,
each other in the environment when people can enrich their knowledge
they go out of the class. through the enjoyable ways.
Learning a foreign language is not
According to Wallace (1992:6-8), There
merely learning the language forms, but are some reasons of reading, as follow:
learning how to use it for the purpose 1) Reading for Survival
of communication.
We might call some kinds of reading in
it is matter of developing and
response to our environment “reading
maintaining a skill through practice, it for survival.” Indeed some reading is
is not appropriate for us to say that we almost literally a matter of life and
have learnt foreign language if we
death, for example a ‘stop’ sign for a
cannot use it for communication in
motorist. Survival reading serves
real-life situation, and we shall never
immediate needs or wishes.
3
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
4
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
5
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
6
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
Validity of Test X1 X 2
To ensured the validity of the test, the t test
1 1
writer used content of validity. It S
means that the test designed based on n1 n 2
the English curriculum at SMA Negeri
With
14 Bandar Lampung.
n1 1S12 n2 1S 22
Reliability Test S2
n1 n 2 2
In analyzing reliability test, the writer
used Product Moment Formula: Equality Test of Two Average
The criteria is accepted if
𝑟𝑥𝑦= 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦−(∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)
at the
√{𝑁 ∑ 𝑥2 −(∑ 𝑥)2 }−{𝑁 ∑ 𝑦2 −(∑ 𝑦)2 }
significance level 5% and 1%.
(Sudjana, 2005:239).
The result by using product
moment formula above was included Different Test of Two Average
into Spearman Brown formula. The The criteria is accepted if
writer got 𝑟11 = 0.98. It was found that at the
reading tyout test was very high significance level 5% and 1%. (Sudjana,
reliability, it was 0.98. Therefore, the 2005: 246.
test can be used to measure the
students’ reading ability. REPORT AND DISCUSSION
Report
Data Normality Test In this part, the writer would like to
It was used to know whether the data explain about the data normality test of
has normal distribution or not. experimental class, the data of
normality test in control class, the
2
k
Oi Ei 2 homogenity test of variance, and the
ratio
Ei hypothesis test.
i 1
8
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
gave the test. The writer got the result The average score:
that the highest score was 85 and the
lowest score is 50 with (n) = 25 Σ𝐹𝑖 . 𝑋𝑖
𝑥̅𝑖 =
students. Obtained the result: Σ𝐹𝑖
1172
Σ𝐹𝑖 = 25 𝑥̅𝑖 =
21
Σ𝐹𝑖 𝑋𝑖 = 1744.5 𝑥̅𝑖 = 53.67
Σ𝐹𝑖 𝑋𝑖 2 = 124058.25
With standard deviation √81.43 = 9.02.
The average score:
Then it counted into chi-square
Σ𝐹𝑖 . 𝑋𝑖 formula:
𝑥̅𝑖 =
Σ𝐹𝑖
𝑘
1744.5 2
(𝑂𝑖 − 𝐸𝑖 )2
𝑥̅𝑖 = 𝜒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜
=∑
25 𝐸𝑖
𝑖=1
𝑥̅𝑖 = 69.78
𝜒 2 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 = 2.23 + 0.57 + 0.33 + 0.56 + 0.74 = 4.43
𝜒 2
=∑
(𝑂𝑖 − 𝐸𝑖 )2 𝜒 2 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 therefore, the criterion was
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 𝐸𝑖
𝑖=1 accepted. It means that the data have
normal distribution.
𝜒 2 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 = 0.31 + 0.25 + 0.01 + 1.72 + 0.32 + 2.06 =
4.67
The Homogenity Test
From the result of x-ratio it was From the result of homogenity test by
obtained at significance level of 0.05 comparing to the f-table (by looking at I
and also 0.01 that 𝜒 2 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 < 𝜒 2 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 = table). It was obtained Fratio was 1.19.
4.67 < 7.81 < 11.3. Since 𝜒 2 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 < Ftable at significant level of 0.05 was
𝜒 2 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 therefore, the criterion was 2.08 and 0.01 was 2.86. Since Fratio <
accepted. It means that the data have Ftable, therefore Ho was accepted (1.19 <
normal distribution. 2.08 < 2.86). It means that the variance
of the data in experimental class and
2) The Report of Control Class control class are homogeneous.
The writer used test on control class in
order to see the students’ achievement The Hypothesis Test
in reading ability. After presenting In calculating the end of result, the
whole materials through direct writer used t-test formula:
instruction on control class and gave
the test. The writer got the result that 𝑋̅1 −𝑋̅2
the highest score was 75 and the lowest 𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 = 1 1
𝑆√ +
score was 40 with (n) = 21 students. 𝑛1 𝑛2
10
Neng Hapsah, Imam Subari, Eva Nurchurifiani.
. . (2004).Teaching by Principles: An
Interactive Approach to Language
Pedagogy.San Francisco: State
University.
Cameron.L.(2001).Teaching Languages to
Young Learners.United Kingdom:
Cambridge University Press.
Coe,V.Z and Glass,C.(2005).Modified
QAR.[Online]. Tersedia:
http://www.ford.ucf.edu/strategie
s/stratgar.html [4 February 2019].
Maharaj,C.(2008).Teaching Reading in the
Early Grades:A teachers’s
Handbook.South Africa: Department
of Education.
11