Sampa Video Case Solution
Sampa Video Case Solution
Sampa Video Case Solution
Year Capex
2001 2100
2002 2100
There is a constraint in g. Make sure
that the g in terminal phase is lower 2003 2100
than the g of the economy 2004 2100
Therefore, CoE =
WACC =
=
Decrease in
trend
Increase in
trend
11.47
6.96*0.16+0.84*11.47
10.75
420256+82626))+(0.25*(82626/502882)
Particulars 2004 2005 2006 2007
EBITDA 110002 121002 133102 146413
(D&A) 91680 92100 92100 92100
EBIT 18322 28902 41002 54313
EBIAT(Tax is 40%) 10993 17341 24601 32588
"+D&A 91680 92100 92100 92100
"-Delta Capex -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100
"-NWC -2377 -2615 -2876 -3164
FCFF 98196 104727 111725 119424
PVIF 0.664 0.600 0.541 0.489
PVCF 65202 62794 60494 58391
EV 1173923 //The main difference between EV from prev
Equity Value = EV - Debt + Cash
= 1097518
BCF Multiple = 16.87425586
Our limit is 30 times, so we are not paying more
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
161054 177159 194875 214363 235799 259379 285317
92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100
68954 85059 102775 122263 143699 167279 193217
41372 51036 61665 73358 86219 100367 115930
92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100
-2100 -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100
-3480 -3828 -4211 -4632 -5095 -5605 -6165
127892 137207 147454 158726 171124 184763 199765
0.442 0.399 0.360 0.325 0.294 0.265 0.239
56467 54704 53088 51604 50239 48983 47824
rence between EV from previous question is because of terminal values being different
2015 2016
313849 323266
92100 2100
221749 321166 Cash flow adjustment for 2004
133049 192699 D&A 91680
92100 2100 "-Delta Capex -2100
-2100 -2100 "-Delta NWC -2377
-6782 -7460 Cash flow adjustment 87203
2609536 185239
0.216 Delta capex is 2100 for the next 15 years
564133 In this case, we have a constraint on delta capex (21L every year for next 15
Thus, cash flow adjustment is dependent only in growth of the NWC
TV 2393269