Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VIII (Eastern Visayas)
Division of Leyte
LORENZO C. MACAYAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
JARO I DISTRICT

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: ELSA T. SANTISO Name of Rater: DIVINA A. TUALLA
Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED LEYTE DIVISION Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Very Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 1.Content 1. Modeled effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable 5
5 5 5 0.375
Education Knowledge and application of content to March application of application of application of application of evidence was
Services Pedagogy knowledge within 2019 content content content content shown
and across knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within
curriculum teaching and across and across and across and across
areas. curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as
shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No 5
4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as acceptable
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from shown
supported by any colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and
1 of the other supported by any supported by any supported by any
given MOV 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed-action No acceptable 2 2 2 2 2 0.15
Education colleagues in the to March completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
Services conduct and 2019 disseminated research with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of action research colleagues.
research to enrich with colleagues.
knowledge of content Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable 2
and pedagogy. 4 of the given of the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable 2
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory(3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable 5 5 5 5 5 0.375
Education applied effective to March effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
Services teaching strategies to 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
creative thinking, as and creative and creative and creative and creative
well as other higher- thinking as well thinking as well thinking as well thinking as well
order thinking skills. as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 or No acceptable 5
more lessons as lessons as lessons as more lessons as evidence was
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Work with June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No acceptable 5 5 5 5 0.375
Education Environment colleagues to to March shared effective shared effective shared effective shared effective evidence was
Services and Diversity model and share 2019 classroom classroom classroom classroom shown
of Learners effective management management management management
techniques in the strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
management of the engage engage engage engage
classroom learners in learners in learners in learners in
structure to activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
engage learners, done in different done in different done in different done in different
individually or in physical physical physical physical
groups, in learning learning learning learning
meaningful environments environments environments environments
exploration, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
discovery and MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
hands-on activities rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
within a range of
physical learning Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 5
environments. least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited Exibited Exibited Exibited No acceptable 5 5 5 5 0.375
Education and constructive to March effective and effective and effective and effective and evidence was
Services behavior 2019 constructive constructive constructive constructive shown
management skills behavior behavior behavior behavior
by applying management management management management
positive and non- skills by skills by skills by skills by
violent discipline to applying applying applying applying
ensure learning- positive and positive and positive and positive and
focused non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning-
focused focused focused focused
environments. environments. environments. environments.
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of
Efficiency Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast No acceptable 5
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 6. Worked with June 2018 7.50% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable 4 4 5 4.5 0.338
Education colleagues to to March colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues but evidence was
Services share 2019 atleast in the atleast in the atleast in the no evidence of shown
differentiated, district/cluster school level todepartment/gra sharing with
developmentally level to share share lesson de level to others
appropriate lesson share lesson
learning Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable 5
experiences to least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson evidence was
address learners’ as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced shown
gender, needs, shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV by either MOV
strengths, interests 1 and 1 and 1 and 2 or 3 but no
and experiences. supported by supported by supported by evidence of
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the sharing with
other other other others
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Develop and June 2018 7.50% Quality Develop and Develop and Develop and Develop and No acceptable 5 5 5 5 0.375
Education and Planning applied effective to March applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
Services strategies in the 2019 strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the shown
planning and planning and planning and planning and planning and
management of management management management management
developmentally developmentall developmentall developmentall developmentall
sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning processes learning learning learning learning
to meet curriculum process as process as process as process as
requirements and shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
varied teaching 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
contexts. of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No acceptable 5

least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as evidence was
as evidence by evidence by evidence by evidence by shown
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 any 1 of the
and supported and supported and supported acceptable
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
acceptable other other
MOV acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led
Occasionally Rarely led No acceptable 4 4 3 3.5 0.263
Education colleagues, to March collaborative collaborative
led collaborative evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 reviews of reviews of
collaborative reviews of shown
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner
reviews of teacher/learner
to plan, facilitate feedback as feedback as
teacher/learner feedback as
and enrich evidenced by evidenced by
feedback as evidenced by
teaching practice. the MOV the MOV evidenced by the MOV
submitted submittedthe MOV submitted
submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 3
collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of shown
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any of
1 and 1 and 1 and the acceptable
supported by supported by supported by MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
Education guided colleagues to March advised advised advised colleagues in evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, the selection, the selection, the selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development
use of appropriate development development development and appropriate
teaching and and appropriate and appropriate and appropriate use of teaching
learning use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
resources, and learning and learning and learning resources as
including ICT, to resources as resources as resources as shown in the
address specific shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
learning goals. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4

least 4 teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
and learning learning learning learning shown
resources as resources as resources as resource as
evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Worked June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
Education Assessment collaboratively with to March reviewed reviewed reviewed reviewed evidence was
Services and colleagues to 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel y collaboratively shown
Reporting review the design, assessment assessment assessment assessment
selection, tools with tools with tools with tools with
organization and colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as
use of a range of shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
effective diagnostic, MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
formative and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4
summative least 4 assessment assessment assessment tool evidence was
assessment assessment tools as tools as as evidently shown
strategies tools as evidently evidently shown in any of
consistent with evidently shown in any of shown in any of the acceptable
curriculum shown in any of the acceptable the acceptable MOV
requirements. the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
Education collaboratively to March collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues shown
evaluation in the in the in the in the
strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment assessment assessment assessment
support learner data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
progress and in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable 4
least 2 different least 3 of the least 2 of the of the MOV evidence was
types of MOV same kind of same kind of shown
MOV MO
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives T imeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 12. Applied skills in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied No acceptable 4 4 4 4 0.3
Education the effective to March applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in skills in the evidence was
Services communication of 2019 the effective the effective the effective effective shown
learner needs, communication communicatio n communicatio n communicatio n
progress and of learner of learner of learner of learner
achievement to needs and needs and needs and needs and
key stakeholders, progress to progress to progress to progress to
including parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
parents/guardians. guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 of Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable 4
the acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives T imeline Score
per KRA Very Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 5 5 5 0.5
Education various to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services related 2019 special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks shown
works/activities and/or and/or and/or and/or
that contribute to assignments assignments assignments assignments
the as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
teaching-learning the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
process. submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted only Submitted only Submitted any 1 No acceptable 5

least 4 3 different kinds 2 different kinds of the evidence was
different kinds of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown
of acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.325
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATI SFACTORY
ADJECT IVAL RAT ING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECT IVAL RAT ING
4.500 -5.000 Outstanding
3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

ELSA T . SANT ISO DIVINA A. T UALLA HERNANDO R. MIRANDA

Rater Ratee Approv ing Authority