Ss IPCRF
Ss IPCRF
Ss IPCRF
Department of Education
NCR
Division of Manila
PEDRO PELAEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
4 4 4 0.300
Services that enhance 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
learner achievement integration within integration within integration within integration within
in literacy and and across and across and across and
numeracy skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject 4
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4
Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills and/or numeracy
4
as shown in as shown in as shown in skills as shown
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range June 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education of teaching to March teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
4 5 4.5 0.338
Services strategies to 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
develop critical and develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
creative thinking, as and creative and creative and creative and creative
well as other higher- thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
order thinking skills. other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as 4
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Presented Annotatio
1. Classroom observation tool (COT)
rating sheet and/or inter-observer
agreement form about knowledge of
content within and across curriculum
teaching areas
Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
2. Formative/summative assessment
11. Monitored and tools with TOS and frequency of errors
evaluated learner progress with identified least mastered skills
and achievement using
learner attainment data. 3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing
index of mastery
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
3. Certificate of Speakership
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons hip
9. Mentoring pre-service/inservice
teachers
Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A
Division of QUEZON
Your School Here
Your District Here
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted Proposed-action No acceptable
Education colleagues in the to March completed and completed action action research research with evidence was
4 4 4 4 0.3
Services conduct and 2019 disseminated research with with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of action research colleagues.
research to enrich with colleagues.
knowledge of
content and
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
pedagogy.
least 4 of the of the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
given MOV MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education applied effective to March effective effective effective effective evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
Services teaching strategies 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
to promote critical strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
and creative promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
thinking, as well as and creative and creative and creative and creative
other higher- order thinking as well thinking as well thinking as well thinking as well
thinking skills. as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Work with June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education Environment colleagues to to March shared shared shared shared evidence was
Services and Diversity model and share 2019 effective effective effective effective shown
of Learners effective classroom classroom classroom classroom
techniques in the management management management management
management of strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
the classroom engage engage engage engage
structure to learners in learners in learners in learners in
engage learners, activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
individually or in done in done in done in done in
groups, in different different different different
meaningful physical physical physical physical
exploration, learning learning learning learning
discovery and environments environments environments environments
hands-on as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
activities within a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
range of physical rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
learning
environments. Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
any 1 of the any 1 of the supported by acceptable
other other any 1of the MOV
acceptable acceptable other given
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited Exibited Exibited Exibited No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education effective and to March effective and effective and effective and effective and evidence was
Services constructive 2019 constructive constructive constructive constructive shown
behavior behavior behavior behavior behavior
management management management management management
skills by applying skills by skills by skills by skills by
positive and non- applying applying applying applying
violent discipline positive and positive and positive and positive and
to ensure non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
learning- focused discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
environments. ensure ensure ensure ensure
learning- learning- learning- learning-
focused focused focused focused
environments. environments. environments. environments.
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of
8 7 6 5
Efficiency Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast No acceptable
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 6. Worked with June 2018 7.50% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues to to March colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues but evidence was
Services share 2019 atleast in the atleast in the atleast in the no evidence of shown
differentiated, district/cluster school level to department/gra sharing with
developmentally level to share share lesson de level to others
appropriate lesson share lesson
learning
experiences to Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
address learners’ least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson evidence was
gender, needs, as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced shown
strengths, shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV by either MOV
interests and 1 and 1 and 1 and 2 or 3 but no
experiences. supported by supported by supported by evidence of
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the sharing with
other other other others
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Develop and June 2018 7.50% Quality Develop and Develop and Develop and Develop and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education and Planning applied effective to March applied applied applied applied evidence was
Services strategies in the 2019 effective effective effective effective shown
planning and strategies in strategies in strategies in strategies in
management of the planning the planning the planning the planning
developmentally and and and and
sequenced management management management management
teaching and developmentall developmentall developmentall developmentall
learning y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
processes to meet teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
curriculum learning learning learning learning
requirements and process as process as process as process as
varied teaching shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
contexts. 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as evidence was
as evidence by evidence by evidence by evidence by shown
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 any 1 of the
and supported and supported and supported acceptable
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
acceptable other other
MOV acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally Rarely led No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues, to March led collaborative led collaborative evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 collaborative reviews of collaborative reviews of shown
learner feedback reviews of teacher/learner reviews of teacher/learner
to plan, facilitate teacher/learner feedback as teacher/learner feedback as
and enrich feedback as evidenced by feedback as evidenced by
teaching practice. evidenced by the MOV evidenced by the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education guided colleagues to March advised advised advised colleagues in evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, the selection, the selection, the selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development
use of appropriate development development development and
teaching and and and and appropriate
learning appropriate appropriate appropriate use of teaching
resources, use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
including ICT, to and learning and learning and learning resources as
address specific resources as resources as resources as shown in the
learning goals. shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
(5) Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education collaboratively to March collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues shown
evaluation in the in the in the in the
strategies of interpretation interpretation interpretation interpretation
attainment data to of assessment of assessment of assessment of assessment
support learner data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
progress and in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted
attainment data to
support learner
progress and
achievement.
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Presented Annotati
3. Developed and
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
demonstration teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies that develop
3. Developed and critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
applied effective teaching
strategies to promote
critical and creative 3. Instructional materials highlighting
thinking, as well as other different teaching strategies that develop
higher- order thinking critical and creative thinking, and/or other
skills. HOTS
1. Providing motivation
6. Worked with
colleagues to share 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
differentiated, strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
developmentally to address learners’ differences
appropriate learning
experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and 3. Corresponding instructional materials
experiences. showing differentiated and
✘
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
to address learners’ differences
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof
of communication using other modalities
(e.g. email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement
6. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation
7. Certificate of Training
13. Performed various
related works/activities
that contribute to the 8. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning
process.
9. Committee involvement
Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary School
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat
Feedback:
RATEE RATER
ol
CRF-DP)
Timeline Resources Needed
APPROVING AUTHORITY
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary School
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat
RATEE RATER
ry School
CHING FORM
SIGNATURE
IMPACT ON JOB/ACTION PLAN
(RATER/RATEE)
APPROVING AUTHORITY