Tugas Artikel Inggris
Tugas Artikel Inggris
Tugas Artikel Inggris
Oleh
Arief Cahyo Utomo 15712251067
PENDIDIKAN DASAR S2
PROGRAM PASCASARJANA
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA
2017
The Influence Of Learning Style Against The Results
Of The Study In Elemenary School Grade IV
Arief Cahyo Utomo
YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY
Abstract
This study aims to find out: (1) whether there is influence of learning style against the
results of the study grade IV SD N pajang 3 Surakarta school year 2014/2015, (2) how
much learning style against the results of the study grade IV SD Negeri Surakarta 3 pajang
school year 2014/2015. The population in this research was all grade IV SD N pajang 3
Surakarta school year 2014/2015. data collection Technique used was a question form,
interviews, and documentation. Analytical techniques used were simple regression
analysis was preceded by analysis of the prerequisite test, namely the test of normality,
linierity and significant of regression. Based on the analysis of data with a 5% significance
level obtained thitung > ttabel, namely 2.34197 > 2.468 and the determination of the
coefficient of 11.8%. Conclusions in this study are as follows: (1) there is significant
influence between the learning style against the results of the study grade IV SD N pajang
3 Surakarta school year 2014/2015, (2) learning style or influence contributions amounted
to 11.8% against the learning outcomes grade IV SD N pajang 3 Surakarta school year
2014/2015.
1. Introduction
2. Method
5. Conclusions
Based on the results of data analysis and discussion of the results described
earlier regarding the influence of the style of study towards a learning outcomes
grade IV SD N pajang 3 academic year 2014/2015 can be drawn the conclusion:
1. Based on the results of the calculation of hypothesis testing is done using t-test,
analysis of the retrieved value thitung of 2.468 and ttabel of 2.34197. Because
thitung > ttabel, then Ho denied. Then it can be inferred that there was
significant influence between the learning style against the results of the study
grade IV SD N Post 3Surakarta school year 2014/2015.
2. Based on the results of the calculation obtained coefficient determination (KP)
of 11.8%. This means that the style of belajarmemberikan donations or the
influence of 11.8% against the learning outcomes grade IV SD N Post 3
Surakarta school year 2014/2015.
Reference
Arikunto, Suharsini. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arthurs, J. (2007). A juggling act in the classroom: Managing dif-ferent
learning styles. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 2, 2-7.
Budiyono. 2013. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Bungin, M. Burhan. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Prenada
Media
Demirbas, O.O. & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process
through learning styles. Design Studies, 24, 437-456.
Demirbas, O.O. & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students
and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design
education. Learning and Instruction, 17, 345-359.
Demirkan, H. & Demirbas, O.O. (2008). Focus on the learning styles of
freshman design students. Design Studies, 29, 254-266.
DePotter, Bobbi dkk. 2009. Quantum Teaching. Mempraktikkan Quantum
Learning di ruang-ruang kelas. Bandung: Kaifa.
Dunn, R., Burke, K., and Whitley, J., (2000) what do know about learning
style? A guide for parents of talented children. Parenting for high
potential, 8-13.
Gunawan, Adi. 2006. Genius Learning Strategi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Iqomuddin, Yazid. 2013. Pengaruh Keaktifan Siswa Dalam Organisasi di
Sekolah dan Gaya Belajar Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika.
Skripsi Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Demirbas, O.O. & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process
through learning styles. Design Studies, 24, 437-456.
Demirbas, O.O. & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students
and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design
education. Learning and Instruction, 17, 345-359.
Demirkan, H. & Demirbas, O.O. (2008). Focus on the learning styles of
freshman design students. Design Studies, 29, 254-266.
Leung, K., & Weng, L. (2007). Validation of Kolb’s structural model of
experiential learning using Honey and Mumford’s Learn-ing Style
Questionnaire. Journal of Medical Education, vol.11,p: 234-243
Mutoharoh, Eka Dewi. 2011. Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Dan Kesulitan Belajar
Terhadap Prestasi Belajar IPA Pada Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri
Purwosuman 1 Sidoharjo Sragen Tahun Pelajaran 2010/ 2011. Skripsi
Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Priyanto. 2013. Pengaruh Kemandirian Dan Gaya Belajar Siswa Terhadap
Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Skripsi Thesis. Universitas
Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Purwanto, Ngalim. 2005. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja
Roesdakarya
Rubiyanto, Rubino. 2013. Penelitian Pendidikan untuk Mahasiswa
Pendidikan Guru SD. Surakarta: FKIP UMS.
Samino dan Saring Marsudi. 2013. Layanan Bimbingan Belajar Pedoman
Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Surakarta: Fairuz Media.
Santoso, Singgih. 2000. Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Parametrik. PT. Elex
Media Komputindo. Jakarta.
Siregar, Syofian. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dilengkapi Dengan
Perbandingan Perhitungan Manual dan SPSS. Jakarta: Kencana.
Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Slaats, A., Lodewijks, H. G. L. C., & Van der Sanden, J. M. M. (1999).
Learning styles in the secondary vocational education: disciplinary
differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, 475e492.
Sudjana. Nana. 2000. Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar
Baru.
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2003. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan.
Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suprijono, Agus. 2012. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Syah, Muhibbin. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Undang-Undang No 20 tahun 2003 Pasal 3 Tentang Tujuan Pendidikan.
Wingkel, W.S. 2009. Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta. Media Abadi