A Practical Guide of Bill of Lading For Seafarers
A Practical Guide of Bill of Lading For Seafarers
A Practical Guide of Bill of Lading For Seafarers
If you ask me to name one document that is most important in shipping trade, I would name it as Bill of Lading. Banks do not issue funds, if the bill
of lading is not clean. Carrier do not release the cargo if they do not receive bill of lading. And carrier cannot escape from claim of liability for cargo
damage against clean bill of lading. The commercial aspect of shipping trade revolves around bill of lading. It is thus important for Masters to be
aware of all the situations they can be subjected to and how they should deal with such situations.
1) Bill of lading quantity not ready before vessel’s departure. This is particularly the case where EDP (Early departure procedure) is
excercised. One such example is loading of crude oil in the port of Rastanura where EDP is common and vessel has to sail minutes after completion
of cargo. This is also common where terminal takes more time for calculating shore figure loaded on board.
2) Terms and conditions for the bill of lading not yet finalised. This can happen if the format of the bill of lading is not yet agreed between the
ship owners and the shipper (or shipper’s charterers). While they may still be communicating on the format of the bill of ladings, owners can instruct
the agent to sign bill of lading on Master’s behalf.
3) The break-up of quantities not yet finalised. Sometimes the break up quantities for a commingled cargo is not finalised. In such case
charterers may request owners to have the bill of ladings signed later by agent on behalf of master.
Whatever the reason, Master must receive explicit instructions from the owners about who will sign the bill of lading. If the agent has to sign bill of
ladings on master’s behalf, he would need master’s authorisation to sign the bill of ladings. In such case, some agents may bring their own format of
“Letter of authorisation” or they can ask master to draft one. In both the cases, Master must ensure that the letter of authorisation has all the
element to safegaurd the interests of the vessel and the owners. The checks to be considered before issuing such authorisation can be
1) The LOA should highlight the fact that “bill of lading should be signed in strict accordance with the mate’s receipt”. And while we put this in LOA, it
is prudent to double check for correctness of details in Mate’s receipt.
2) LOA should also instruct the agent to send the draft copy of the B/L to the owners for their approval before signing it.
3) LOA should instruct the agent to sign the bill of lading in strict compliance with the terms of the relevant charter party.
4) LOA should give as much detail to the cargo as possible. Each bill of lading to be signed by agent would require a different LOA. If the break up
quantities are not finalised by the charterers, Master may require to issue a common LOA for each grade and later issue LOA with split quanities.
Master should be more cautious with the letter of authorisations if the agent signing the bill of lading is not appointed by the owners.
1. Signing incomplete bill of ladings: In ports where EDP (early departure proceudres) is involved, shipper may present a blank or incomplete bill
of lading for master to sign. No matter what, these should never be signed.
2. Format of bill of lading: The first thing for the Master to check is if the correct form for the bill of ladings is used. There are different kind of
forms in use in shipping industry. These could range from the standard form from different shipping agencies, P&I club or shipping bodies. Or these
could be a form that is formated by the ship owner to suit their requirement. Master must clarify with the ship owners as to which form is in
use. One way for Masters to do this to ask the owners to send him the draft copy of the final bill of lading that he will be signing. Draft copy would
have all the details of final bill of ladings inserted in it except the cargo quantities. Once the Master has the draft bill of lading, he can just compare
same with final bill of lading before signing.
3. Date of Loading: Date of loading might look a small thing but wrong date on bill of lading can have major implications. Date of loading should be
the actual date on which cargo was loaded on board. If the loading took more than one day, the date of completion of cargo should be inserted. If
previous or post date is inserted into the bill of lading, shipowner might be at risk of claims from cargo interests. That is because the value of the
cargo varies each day. Cargo buyer may have to pay more or less amount to seller depending upon the change in cargo price for that day. Whatever
the change, someone (Buyer or seller of the cargo) will be at loss and they would pass this loss to the carrier. Even P&I clubs do not entertain these
claims and these would finally be out of pocket expenses for the owners.
4. Correct Cargo quantity: Correct cargo quantity is most important information in the bill of lading. This is the information that is in direct control
of master and his crew. If the vessel has received lesser quantity than the bill of lading quantity, Master should refrain from signing the bill of lading,
even if terminal is ready to sign letter of descripency or letter of protest for difference in quantities. Master should follow the guidance provided in
SMS manuals of the company or the charter party for the instructions to deal with such situations. Usually, charter party instruct the Masters to sign
bill of ladings if difference in quantities is less than 0.3%. If the difference is more than 0.3%, master should refrain from signing the bill of lading
and call P&I club after consulting the ship owners.
5. Freight Prepaid: There are usually one of these two statements regarding freight that would be bill of ladings. “Freight Prepaid” or “Freight
payable as per terms and conditions of relevant charter party”. Clause “freight prepaid” implies that carrier has already received the freight. Master
must never sign bill of ladings with the clause “freight prepaid” without express permission from the shipowners. This is because of obvious reason
that if the freight is not paid yet, you do not want to sign a legal document that states otherwise.
If requested by shipper, Master must deny any such request as their are risks involved with this. The main risk involved is the change of ownership
of the cargo while the vessel is enroute. If there has been change of title of the cargo, this would reflect on the two bill of ladings but not on the bill
of lading carried by th master onboard. So the bill of lading carried by the master may not be showing correct details to whom the cargo belongs.
The ship owner will have absolutely no defense in wrongful delivery of the cargo in this case.
5) Request to discharge cargo at different destination to that in bill of lading
If a request is made to proceed to a port different than that mentioned in bill of lading, master must inform the ship owners. Apart from that he
must proceed only when ship owners have safeguarded their interest. There are two risks involved in such a request. first, one of the original being
presented at port of discharge stated in bill of lading. Second, claim for deviation to another port. Ship owners has the arrangements to deal with
such requests, such as they can ask the shipper to re-issue the bill of lading after destroying the previous one. Whatever the arrangements,