Explanation Why We Need Loi For Commingling

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that shipboard blending of oil cargoes carries risks and liabilities for the carrier. An LOI is needed to protect the carrier when agreeing to blend cargoes on board at the charterer's request.

Some of the risks involved in shipboard blending of oil cargoes are affecting the specification of already loaded cargo, complications with bills of lading, and liability under bills of lading.

Some advantages of shipboard blending are flexibility for traders, but some disadvantages are greater variables/errors and limited physical mixing. Other blending methods generally have greater accuracy.

EXPLANATION WHY WE NEED LOI FOR COMMINGLING

Shipowners carrying oil in bulk may sometimes be asked to commingle or blend


cargoes. The following article examines some of the risks involved in this practice and
suggests a wording for an indemnity in case an owner decides to run this risk for
commercial reasons. Any liability arising from this practice is outside the scope of the
P&I cover.
Commingling or blending cargo on board
Commingling or blending is mostly associated with oil cargoes in bulk. Cargo interests
may wish to blend cargoes loaded on different dates, at different places, or with different
specifications.
Shipboard commingling or blending of cargo is not done without risk. The commingling
or blending may affect the specification of the cargo already loaded and the carrier may
be held liable under any bill of lading already issued for such cargo. The same liability
may arise under the bill of lading to be issued for the second parcel of the cargo to be
loaded. While a remark can be inserted in the bill of lading for this parcel drawing
attention to the commingling/blending, should the cargo be loaded in apparent good
order and condition there will be no basis for clausing which casts doubt on its apparent
order and condition. There may also be complications with regard to dates and places of
shipment stated in the bills of lading. If dates and places are different, a single bill of
lading should not be issued.
Most blending is performed in shore tanks and the greatest degree of accuracy is
achieved when entire shipments are pre-mixed in shore tanks prior to transfer. However,
within the industry, on board blending is apparently a recognised means by which the
cargo may be prepared to specification (if nothing goes wrong) in the vessels tanks,
normally by volumetrically blending individual components.
On board blending offers certain conveniences to suppliers, particularly to oil traders
that may have limited (or no) terminal facilities. Shipboard blending allows traders to
meet certain issues in their business, including:
Limited storage space
Freedom to choose suppliers
Limited inventory
Considerable physical distance between product components
Compared to other methods of blending, i.e., batch blending in a storage tank or in-line
metered blend components, on board blending is a complex alternative. Some of the
negative aspects of this type of blending are:

Greater number of variables and unknowns


Errors are more difficult to fix
Physical mixing is limited
LOIs
The starting point is that the charterer or shipper has no right to require commingling or
blending, unless this has already been agreed in the charterparty. On the contrary, the
law specifically requires the carrier to segregate parcels loaded at different times, even if
they are of the same grade. As one will appreciate, shipboard commingling or blending
is clearly outside the normal scope of the carriers obligations under the Hague/HagueVisby Rules and as such it will most likely affect the P&I cover for any liability which may
arise as a consequence.
A carrier who, for commercial reasons, wishes to comply with a request from a charterer
to commingle or blend on board, should require a suitable LOI offering best possible
security in terms of any liability that may be incurred and also in respect of costs and
expenses incurred including loss of time. After all, additional costs or liabilities due to
blending should be for the charterers account.
Further, it is extremely important that the charterers orders regarding blending of cargo
are in writing, including the name of the charterers authorised signatory. The orders
must be clear, so it can be shown later exactly what the charterer required. Last and
perhaps most important, owners should always seek confirmation in writing from
charterers/shippers that the receivers/consignees, who are buying the cargo, know
about and agree to the proposed blending.
Wording
Gard Services appreciates that some of its members would like to have a suitable LOI
wording easily available when needed. Members may wish to use the following as a
basis from which to work. It should, however, be emphasised that the decision whether
to accept any LOI and if so, the form and wording of such LOI, is solely a commercial
decision for members to take. Any liability falling on a member by reason of their
complying with a request to commingle or blend the cargo will not be covered by the
Club by reason of Rule 34 of the Associations Statutes and Rules.
LETTER OF INDEMNITY
FOR BLENDING/COMMINGLING CARGOES ON BOARD
AND SUBSTITUTING BILLS OF LADING

To:[insert name of shipowners]


The Owners of the [insert name of ship]
[insert address]
[insert date]
Dear Sirs,
Ship: [insert name of ship]
Voyage: [insert details]
Charterparty dated [insert date] between [insert name ofparties]
Bills of Lading [insert identification numbers, dates andplaces of issue]
The above vessel has loaded the following cargo(es):
a) at [place]on [date],m/t of [typeof cargo]
b) at [place]on [date],m/t of [typeof cargo]
and bills of lading have been issued as follows:
Bills of lading [insert identification numbers, dates andplaces of issue]
Further to the above, the vessel is to load/ has loaded[delete as appropriate] the
following cargo(es):
c) aton,m/t of
d) aton,m/t of
and bills of lading were to be/have been [delete as appropriate]issued accordingly.
Bills of lading [insert identification numbers, date andplace of issue]
We, [insert name of requesting party], Charterers of theabove vessel under the above
charterparty, now wish thecargo(es) referred to in ([a, b, c or d]) and (...[a,b, c or d])
above to be blended/commingled on board thevessel and hereby request you order the
vessel to performthe said blending/commingling of the cargo(es).

We also request you to substitute the original bills oflading for the cargo(es) referred to
in ([a, b, cor d]) and (...[a, b, c or d]) above with new bills of ladingfor cargo(es)
referred to in ([a, b, c or d]) and(...[a, b, c or d]). The new bills of lading are to be
issuedin the same form and content as the substituted bills, exceptas follows:
(i) [insert details of changes, e.g., to issue date, shipper,consignee, etc.]
(ii) they will contain in description of the cargo the followingstatement: ...m/t of
blended/commingled onboard from ...m/t of...loaded aton andm/tof loaded at
on
(iii) they will contain the following exclusion of carriersliability: the carrier shall not be
liable for anyloss or damage to the cargo whatsoever and howsoever arisingfrom the
blending/commingling, whether or not arising fromnegligence on the part of the carrier,
their servants oragents
In consideration of your complying with our above request,we hereby agree as follows:
1. To indemnify you, your servants and agents and to holdall of you harmless in respect
of any liability, loss, damageor expense of whatsoever nature and howsoever arising,
includingbut not limited to any liability in connection with changeof quantity, quality or
pumpability and/or any damage tothe vessel including tanks, pumps and lines, and
which youmay sustain by reason of blending/commingling cargo(es)on board and/or by
issuing bills of lading in accordancewith our request.
2. To accept full responsibility and risk for the successor otherwise of the
blending/commingling operation and theconsequences of any failure of whatsoever
nature and howsoeverarising from the operation, whether or not arising fromyour, your
servants or your agents negligence.
3. To pay you on demand the amount of any loss, damage orexpense of whatsoever
nature and howsoever arising whichyou, your servants or agents may incur or be faced
withincurring by reason of blending/commingling cargo(es) onboard and/or by issuing
bills of lading in accordance withour request.
4. To treat all time used during or arising from blending/comminglingcargo(es) on board
and/or by issuing bills of lading astime on hire/laytime or time on demurrage [delete as

appropriate].
5. To provide to your satisfaction, and as a pre-requisiteto the commencement of any
blending/commingling operation,the following:
(a)A letter of indemnity in these terms, with authorised signatures.
(b) Surrender of all of the original bills of lading forthe cargo(es) referred to in ([a, b, c
or d]) and([a, b, c or d]) together with written confirmationfrom the holders/transferees
of those bills of lading thatthey have lawful title to the cargo(es) and are authorisedin
their own right and by the owners of the cargo(es) to:
(i) Authorise the blending/commingling operation and substitutionof those original bills of
lading as requested herein.
(ii) Accept substitution of those bills of lading by newbills of lading in the terms stated
above, such substitutiontaking effect at the time of issue of the new bills of lading.
6. In the event of any proceedings being commenced againstyou or any of your servants
or agents in connection withblending/commingling cargo(es) on board and/or issuing
billsof lading in accordance with our request, to provide youor them on demand with
sufficient funds to defend the same.
7. If, in connection with blending/commingling cargo(es)on board and/or issuing bills of
lading in accordance withour requests, the ship or any other ship or property inthe same
or associated ownership, management or controlshould be arrested or detained or
should the arrest or detentionthereof be threatened, or should there be any
interferencein the use or trading of the vessel (whether by virtue ofa caveat being
entered on the ships registry or otherwise),to provide on demand such bail or other
security as maybe required to prevent such arrest or detention or to securethe release of
such ship or property or to remove such interferenceand to indemnify you in respect of
any liability, loss,damage or expense caused by such arrest or detention orthreatened
arrest or detention or such interference, whetheror not such arrest or detention or
threatened arrest ordetention or interference may be justified.
8. The liability of each and every person under this indemnityshall be joint and several
and shall not be conditionalupon your proceeding first against any person, whether ornot
such person is party to or liable under this indemnity.
9. This indemnity shall be governed by and construed inaccordance with English law
and each and every person liableunder this indemnity shall at your request submit to

thejurisdiction of the High Court of Justice in London.


Yours faithfully,
For and on behalf of
[insert name of Requestor]
The Requestor

For and on behalf of


[insert name of bank]
Bankers
..
[insert full details of the office to which any demand ornotice is to be addressed.]

Suggested reply for the charterer if they ask why we need LOI:
Dear Sir,
Pls be advised that the starting point is that the charterer or shipper has no right to
require commingling or blending, unless this has already been agreed in the
charterparty. On the contrary, the law specifically requires the carrier to segregate
parcels loaded at different times, even if they are of the same grade. As one will
appreciate, shipboard commingling or blending is clearly outside the normal scope
of the carriers obligations under the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules and as such it will
most likely affect the P&I cover for any liability which may arise as a consequence.
A carrier who, for commercial reasons, wishes to comply with a request from a
charterer to commingle or blend on board, should require a suitable LOI offering
best possible security in terms of any liability that may be incurred and also in
respect of costs and expenses incurred including loss of time. After all, additional
costs or liabilities due to blending should be for the charterers account.
Further, it is extremely important that the charterers orders regarding blending of
cargo are in writing, including the name of the charterers authorised signatory. The
orders must be clear, so it can be shown later exactly what the charterer required.
Last and perhaps most important, owners should always seek confirmation in
writing from charterers/shippers that the receivers/consignees, who are buying the
cargo, know about and agree to the proposed blending.

You might also like