Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Structural Assessment of Transportation Facility: North Kitsap School District

    Uploaded by

    Supun Aravinda Jayawardhane
    The document provides a structural review of elements for a transportation facility. It includes: - An introduction and scope to review structural drawings and develop a 3D model. - Details of loads like imposed, super dead, live, wind and snow loads that were extracted from drawings. - Load combinations for ultimate and serviceability limit states. - An inventory of steel sections used like W8x24, W10x33, W12x35 along with their properties. - A review of the capacity of sections for shear, compression and bending forces. - An example capacity check for section W8x24 under calculated loadings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Structural Assessment of Transportation Facility: North Kitsap School District

    Uploaded by

    Supun Aravinda Jayawardhane
    11 views8 pages
    The document provides a structural review of elements for a transportation facility. It includes: - An introduction and scope to review structural drawings and develop a 3D model. - Details of loads like imposed, super dead, live, wind and snow loads that were extracted from drawings. - Load combinations for ultimate and serviceability limit states. - An inventory of steel sections used like W8x24, W10x33, W12x35 along with their properties. - A review of the capacity of sections for shear, compression and bending forces. - An example capacity check for section W8x24 under calculated loadings.

    Original Description:

    Design steel

    Original Title

    Draft Report 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a structural review of elements for a transportation facility. It includes: - An introduction and scope to review structural drawings and develop a 3D model. - Details of loads like imposed, super dead, live, wind and snow loads that were extracted from drawings. - Load combinations for ultimate and serviceability limit states. - An inventory of steel sections used like W8x24, W10x33, W12x35 along with their properties. - A review of the capacity of sections for shear, compression and bending forces. - An example capacity check for section W8x24 under calculated loadings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    11 views8 pages

    Structural Assessment of Transportation Facility: North Kitsap School District

    Uploaded by

    Supun Aravinda Jayawardhane
    The document provides a structural review of elements for a transportation facility. It includes: - An introduction and scope to review structural drawings and develop a 3D model. - Details of loads like imposed, super dead, live, wind and snow loads that were extracted from drawings. - Load combinations for ultimate and serviceability limit states. - An inventory of steel sections used like W8x24, W10x33, W12x35 along with their properties. - A review of the capacity of sections for shear, compression and bending forces. - An example capacity check for section W8x24 under calculated loadings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 8

    Structural Elements Review

    Structural Assessment of Transportation


    Facility

    North Kitsap School District


    Structural Elements Review

    Content
    Structural Elements Review

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Mr. Bill Wilson sought the assistance to conduct a Design review for the Transportation facility
    of North Kitsap District. This report is to elaborate the findings of review and to provide
    recommendations. Design was reviewed according to euro code standards. Necessary
    material details and design loads were extracted from the provided structural drawings. Design
    was reviewed for the base bid.

    2.0 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES


    Our scope is to conduct a structural elements review for the above transportation facility.
    Objectives are mentioned below.

    1. Developing 3D model from Finite Element Software


    2.Structural drawings Review
    3.Reviewing material properties and loads
    4.Section Capacity Review
    5.Reinforcement Detailing review
    6.Conclusions and Recommendations

    3.0 PRELIMINARIES
    Loads were extracted from the given structural drawings and summary of loads are
    mentioned in Table .

    Table 1: Imposed and Super Dead Load Types

    Loading purpose Loading Type Value ( kN/m2)


    Office Live Load 2.6
    Partitions Live Load 1
    Storage(Light) Live Load 6
    Traffic zone Live Load 12
    Non Traffic Zone Live Load 6
    Exists Live Load 4.8
    Roof Live Load 1.2
    Structural Elements Review

    Wind Loads
    Wind speed was considered as 80 mph with the exposure class B(These are wind speeds
    that are expected to occur once in 50 years.. For Eurocode this can be converted to 22 m/s
    (10 min wind speed) and the Global Structure was analyzed for the above wind speed.

    Wind Analysis to Main Building

    Basic values

    Wind speed velocity vb,map = 22.0 m/s


    Altitude factor; calt = 1.072
    Fundamental basic wind velocity; vb,0 = vb,map  calt = 23.6 m/s
    Direction factor; cdir = 1.00
    Season factor; cseason = 1.00
    Shape parameter K; K = 0.2
    Exponent n; n = 0.5
    Probability factor; cprob = [(1 - K  ln(-ln(1-p)))/(1 - K  ln(-ln(0.98)))]n = 1.00
    Basic wind velocity (Exp. 4.1); vb = cdir  cseason  vb,0  cprob = 23.6 m/s
    Reference mean velocity pressure; qb = 0.5    vb2 = 0.341 kN/m2

    Calculated Loads from Wind Analysis

    Roof load case 1 - Wind 0, cpi -0.30, - cpe


    Total vertical net force; Fw,v = -381.61 kN
    Total horizontal net force; Fw,h = -102.25 kN

    Roof load case 2 - Wind 0, cpi -0.30, + cpe


    Total vertical net force; Fw,v = 744.78 kN
    Total horizontal net force; Fw,h = 199.56 kN
    Roof load case 3 - Wind 0, cpi 0.20, - cpe
    Total vertical net force; Fw,v = -1167.83 kN
    Total horizontal net force; Fw,h = -312.92 kN
    Roof load case 4 - Wind 0, cpi 0.20, + cpe
    Total vertical net force; Fw,v = -41.44 kN
    Total horizontal net force;
    Fw,h = -11.10 kN
    Structural Elements Review

    Wall load case 1 - Wind 0, cpi -0.30, - cpe


    Equiv leeward net force for overall section; Fl = Fw,wE = -556.9 kN
    Net windward force for overall section; Fw = Fw,wD = 2815.6 kN
    Overall loading overall section; Fw,D = 2915.2 kN

    Wall load case 2 - Wind 0, cpi -0.30, + cpe


    Equiv leeward net force for overall section; Fl = Fw,wE = -556.9 kN
    Net windward force for overall section; Fw = Fw,wD = 2815.6 kN
    Overall loading overall section; Fw,D = 3184.2 kN

    Wall load case 3 - Wind 0, cpi 0.20, - cpe


    Equiv leeward net force for overall section; Fl = Fw,wE = -2212.0 kN
    Net windward force for overall section; Fw = Fw,wD = 1371.1 kN
    Overall loading overall section; Fw,D = 2915.2 kN

    Wall load case 4 - Wind 0, cpi 0.20, + cpe


    Equiv leeward net force for overall section; Fl = Fw,wE = -2212.0 kN
    Net windward force for overall section; Fw = Fw,wD = 1371.1 kN
    Overall loading overall section; Fw,D = 3184.2 kN

    Loading Combinations

    Total Dead Load (DL) was calculated from the sum of self-weight of element and
    corresponding superimposed loads. Live load (LL) was calculated with corresponding live load
    value. Ultimate Loading Combination According to Australian code was taken as follows.

    Ultimate Limit State Load Combination : 1.2 DL+1.5 LL

    Serviceability Limit State Load Combination: 1.0DL + 1.0 LL

    4.0 FUNCTIONALITY OF THE STRUCTURE


    Structural Elements Review

    5.0 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT REVIEW


    Identified Steel Structural Elements of the building
    Used Steel Grade is A36.Which has a modulus of elasticity of 29x106 lb/ft2 and a weight of
    490 lb/ft3 .

    Section Name Depth(in) Flange Flange Web


    Width(in) Thickness(in) Thickness(in)
    W8x24 7.93 6.495 0.4 0.245
    W10x33 9.73 7.985 0.53 0.315
    W10x45 10.1 8.02 0.62 0.35
    W12x26 12.22 6.49 0.38 0.23
    W12x35 12.5 6.56 0.52 0.3
    W12x53 12.06 9.995 0.575 0.345
    W14x22 13.74 5 0.335 0.23
    W14x61 13.89 9.995 0.645 0.375
    W16x26 15.69 5.5 0.345 0.25
    W16x36 15.86 6.985 0.43 0.295
    W16x40 16.01 6.995 0.505 0.305
    W16x50 16.26 7.07 0.63 0.38
    W16x57 16.43 7.12 0.715 0.43
    W16x77 16.52 10.295 0.76 0.455
    TS4x4x1/4 4 4 0.25 0.25
    TS8x6x5/16 8 6 0.32 0.32
    Structural Elements Review

    Capacity Review for Each Section

    Section Name Shear Shear Compression Bending Bending


    Y-Y X-X (kips) X-X Y-Y
    (kips) (kips) (kips_ft) (kips_ft)
    W8x24 28 67.3 100 41 15
    W10x33 40 89.6 157 70 25
    W10x45 50.9 128.6 219 99 36
    W12x26 40.4 63.8 102 67 15
    W12x35 54 88.2 140 92 21
    W12x53 60.1 148.7 282 140 52
    W14x22 45.4 43.3 51 60 8
    W14x61 75.1 166.9 322 183 59
    W16x26 56.5 49.1 69 79 10
    W16x36 67.5 77.8 142 115 25
    W16x40 70.3 91.4 163 131 23
    W16x50 89.2 115.2 206 165 29
    W16x57 101.5 131.7 236 189 34
    W16x77 108.1 202.5 407 269 74
    TS4x4x1/4 19.3 19.3 45 8 8
    TS8x6x5/16 55.6 24.1 96 30 18

    Section W8x24

    Loading Area for Section W8x24 located in Grids M , N , O. (Consider the Maximum Loads)

    A = 53.4 m2
    Structural Elements Review

    Lets take typical roof dead load as 15 pounds per square foot.

    Loads acting of W8x24 Section

    Acting Loads Value Unit


    Dead Loads
    Roof 0.75 kN/m2
    Beam ( W12x35 ) 47.45 N/m
    Column ( W8x24 ) 32.54 N/m
    Live Loads
    Wind 0.25 kN/m2
    Snow 1.2 kN/m2

    Total ULS Load on W8x24 = 1.35 x 40.44 + 1.5 x 13.35+0.7 x 64.08

    Total ULS load on W8x24 = 119.5 kN (26.86 kips)

    Identified Concrete Structural Elements of the building


    Foundation

    You might also like