PURPOSE: To Find The Communication Network and Link Into It
PURPOSE: To Find The Communication Network and Link Into It
PURPOSE: To Find The Communication Network and Link Into It
• Learn how to interact with police, judges, clerks, federal agents and other
public and private people under any circumstance with success
Diploma. [Greek diploma – a paper folded double, from diploo – to fold, double] A
letter or writing usually under seal and signed by competent authority conferring some
power, privilege, or honor.
Since you have finished COURSE 4 - Redemption, you should have your treaty in
effect. So now you can be a “diplomat” and artfully conduct negotiations with the view
of securing advantages.
When you decide you are going to jump into the realm of discharging public debt, it is
vital that you know and understand the rules of the game. One very important thing to
remember when doing this often dangerous excursion is that the bankers want you to
know that “only they can use your credit – not you!” Of course this is ridiculous and
absurd when you understand that you are the creditor and every product that you see
exists solely on the fact that you furnished the credit to make it from the very beginning.
To start with, you should already be knowledgeable and effective in completing the
administrative processes whenever you receive a dishonor from anyone of your debtors.
These processes are detailed in COURSE 5 – The Power of Acceptance. The key
processes include your own private affidavit and the essential follow-up default
procedure, as well as the notarial protest and the eventual involuntary bankruptcy
proceeding to liquidate YOUR equity formerly in possession of the debtor. Notice I said
YOUR equity. Everything the municipalities and corporations have purchased was
produced by the use of YOUR credit as production capital.
We will be defining terms of all the actions and procedures relating to this subject. A
complete study of the etymology of each word is vital for understanding and if done
correctly the definitions speak for themselves in finding the answer. The following
definitions are taken from Black’s 6th edition which are typed in italics. The derivations
are taken from the Consolidated Webster Encyclopedic Dictionary 1939 edition. The
Hebrew and Greek definitions are taken from the Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance to
the King James Bible.
We will start with one of the most powerful terms on this subject that is the key to
understanding redemption.
When you understand the “power of acceptance”, then you will see the world in a
different light. You will realize, possibly for the first time, that you no longer have to
“fight”, “deny”, or “argue” as these are all dishonor. And, that you have the power to
create a binding contract on YOUR terms. You will realize that YOU HAVE POWER!
YOUR AGENTS
Occasionally, while finishing up your processes, one may encounter the Secret Service.
To a “citizen” or a “debtor”, this may sound frightening. But for a creditor, you will
look forward to getting your commercial matter resolved by your “agents”.
Secret Service. The investigative responsibilities are to detect and arrest persons
committing any offense against the laws of the United States relating to coins,
obligations and securities or the United States and of foreign governments (that's you,
remember); and to detect and arrest persons violating certain laws relating to the
FDIC, Federal land banks, electronic fund transfer frauds, credit and debit card
frauds, false identification documents.
Did you know that the duty of the Secret Service is to “detect and arrest persons” that
violate the laws pertaining to “securities of foreign governments”? You should know by
now that you are a government “foreign” to the US government and all municipalities,
and that the credit they enjoy is backed by YOUR securities. So, if one of your debtors
dishonors your check on a private account where they were supposed to do an
“electronic funds transfer”, would this constitute a “fraud” on their part? Does this mean
that they could be arrested for this? Yes it does! And to aid the Secret Service so that
they can investigate the facts and do their duty to you, they must be provided with
“information”.
Notary Public. A public officer whose function it is to administer oaths; to attest and
certify, by his hand and official seal, certain classes of documents, in order to give them
credit and authenticity in foreign jurisdictions; to perform certain official acts, chiefly
in commercial matters, such as the protesting of notes and bills, the noting of foreign
drafts, and marine protests in cases of loss or damage.
If the debtor has dishonored your acceptance after you have returned it to them and they
“argue” the charge still exists, then THEY can now be CHARGED with an information
or an indictment. To complete this process one must be able to locate a notary public
knowledgeable on this subject and willing to do a notarial protest. When the notarial
protest process is completed it is as effective as a criminal indictment from a grand jury
or a prosecutor. On the civil side it is as effective as a Default Judgment in a State’s
Superior Court! You should then send an “affidavit of information” along with the
completed administrative process to the Secret Service as well as the US Attorney, US
Attorney General, US Secretary of Treasury, US Secretary of State, Director of IRS, and
your own state’s relating officers. This is covered in detail in COURSE 5 –
CONTRACTS.
There is another part of the definition of the Secret Service that is important here;
Visiting. In international law, the right of visit or visitation is the right of a cruiser or
warship to stop a vessel sailing under another flag on the high seas, and send an officer
to such vessel to ascertain whether her nationality is what it purports to be.
Visitor. A person appointed to visit, inspect, inquire into, and correct irregularities of
corporations.
Is there any reason why we would “decline” the offer of someone to protect us and our
securities? All the Secret Service is there for is to “ascertain” whether your foreign
nationality is what you purport it to be. If you are not sure you are a foreign nation –
THEN YOU AREN’T ONE! How then, can one BE a foreign nation? You must think,
act and speak like a foreign head.
Usually, the Secret Service will contact you to do an interview with them. When they
offer, you should NOT decline as they are there to help you in handling the corporation
that dishonored your acceptance. You will be acting as a visitor to “inspect, inquire into
and correct irregularities of corporations”. To be prepared for this meeting separately
package copies of all the administrative process and perfected claims that you have done
on each dishonor, then attaching the “affidavit of information” as the cover letter. Now
you have everything they need to continue in the “investigation” of the corporation that
dishonored you through “electronic transfer fund fraud”. Because – that is their job!
Now you are acting like a creditor, a principal, a head of a foreign government. A
DIPLOMAT!
Be very happy to see them and thank them for looking into this matter for you. Ask
them for their card so that you can give them any further information regarding this
matter. It would also be impressive to have a card to give to them – this would be very
professional and respectful. Encourage them to keep you updated on the progress of the
investigation, but let them know that time is of the essence in completing the liquidation
of the corporation’s equity and that if it was absolutely necessary, you could allow them
more time to handle the matter.
If they ask you where does the money come from to pay for the items, you should
correct them and say “there is no money, because the UNITED STATES and all
municipalities are in bankruptcy and the only currency that exists is the people’s
credit”. You could also tell them “the US Trust Fund is where all of the people’s
property has been collateralized to create the credit of the nation”. If they appear
confused, show them a copy of the 73rd Congress, March 9, 1933 where it says:
“(the new money) will be backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a
mortgage on all the homes and property of all the people in the nation.”
Wow! They would be so impressed and shocked that they had actually witnessed a
creditor who knows his business, that they in turn would probably conduct themselves
more respectful and businesslike towards you.
DRILL: Practice talking to an “agent” using the above information until you are
comfortable with the flow of the conversation. Have your classmate, as the agent, start
with a low gradient and work up to a stressful situation. Then reverse the flow to your
classmate.
While defining the following terms, keep in mind how each definition relates to
“accounting principles”. The “court” is merely a commercial enterprise existing
primarily to sell you “governmental services” such as “whisking you off to secluded get-
a-ways” where you get “free room and board” and the “state of the art security is the
finest money (your credit) can by”. First we will start with some terms of how the USA
looks at your relationship with your strawman corporation.
Implied Partnership. One which is not a real partnership but which is recognized by
the court as such because of the conduct of the parties; in effect, the parties are
estopped from denying the existence of a partnership.
Charging order. A statutorily created means for a creditor (USA) of a judgment debtor
(strawman, JOHN) who is a partner of others (John) to reach the debtor’s beneficial
interest in the partnership (your credit), without risking dissolution of the partnership.
Uniform Partnership Act, ss 28.
It is the intention of the USA, as plaintiff, to “charge” JOHN so John can go in and
“conduct himself as a partner” and argue about it. You cannot “deny” or you will, of
course, dishonor yourself and they win. The whole trick they use is to get your credit
without you knowing that they are charging the “partner”, and to keep the “partnership”
going without risk of dissolution. Are these guys slick or what?
Charge account. System of purchasing goods and services on credit, under which
customer (you) agrees to settle or make payments on his balance.
No matter what they do to “compel” you into court – DON’T GO. Why would a
soveran go to a place and let his servants sort out his affairs for him. Let’s say you are
handed an arrest warrant by a “peace officer” after you “fail to appear”. Look it over and
make sure it is correct, then say:
Give the warrant back to him as you say it. It does not matter at that point what he does
with it as it is a balanced the account, a done deal, finito! Don’t take it back, because it
has already been discharged. It is a COMPLETED CYCLE OF ACTION.
The bailee (officer) then may “escort” you to the “warehouse”. The first thing you must
do when you get there is ask for your phone call that you are guaranteed to get so that
you can call the magistrate that will be able to give you an “appearance bond”. You are
guaranteed this call even if you have called someone else first. This is the right to go
before a magistrate within 24 hours of your “detainment”. When talking to the
magistrate make a “statement” as follows:
“I want closure on this matter and I do not intend to dispute the facts.”
Closed account. An account to which no further additions can be made on either side,
but which remains still open for adjustment and set-off, which distinguishes it from and
account stated.
Set-off. The equitable right to cancel or offset mutual debts or cross demands,
commonly used by a bank (you) in reducing a customer’s (USA) checking or deposit
account in satisfaction of a debt the customer (USA) owes the bank (you).
You see, YOU are the bank! You and your property are the only substance that exists in
this fictional system of commerce and you are the only one who can USE it for any
purpose. Your substance is the only reason the corporations exist and function at all.
The only way to settle the account is to “cancel mutual debt”, because being in
bankruptcy - THERE IS NO MONEY!
Sounds like DISHONOR to me. So when you say “I do not intend to dispute the facts”,
what are you saying? I ACCEPT the charges and now I OWN them!
Fact [L facio to do or make] A true statement. A fact is either a state of things, that is in
existence, or a motion, that is, an event. Evidence. A truth, as distinguished from fiction
or error. “Fact” means reality of events or things, the actual occurrence or existence of
which is to be determined by evidence.
Admissions. More accurately regarded, they are statements by a party (JOHN), or some
one identified with him (John as a partner) in legal interest, of the existence of a fact
which is relevant to the cause.
As creditor, you are asking to see the statement of account as distinguished from
“fiction” which is assumption and presumption. You want to see the basis of the charge
– the FACTS.
So the question you may be asking yourself is “why would I ask for an
appearance bond”? To answer this question one must understand the exact
definition of this term.
Bond. In every case a bond represents debt – its holder is a creditor of the corporation
(you) and not a part owner as is the shareholder. The word “bond” is sometimes used
more broadly to refer also to unsecured debt instruments.
Does this appearance bond request you to come to court or something else? What name
is on the charging instrument entitled COMPLAINT? Your name or the strawman’s
name? If you say “the strawman”, how is he going to make an “appearance”?
Just what is the strawman anyway? Can you see a “strawman”? No, but you can show
evidence of it. It is an “account” of all the debits the UNITED STATES and
municipalities enter to show debt, hence DEBTOR. It is the opposite (public) side of the
account which shows the credits (private). And who does the credits belong to? You the
“creditor”. This being the case, one could see “evidence” of the strawman or the
“account which shows the debt”.
Does the strawman represent you? No, absolutely not! What then does the strawman
represent – who/what created the strawman and is using the credit of the creditor?
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the plaintiff, who also represents the DEBTOR. Do
I hear conflict of interest? So how can this be a judicial proceeding? It is an
impossibility. It is a “business transaction in commerce”, and the only reason they need
you present at the negotiations is so that you, as the principal, can sign for the debtor in
order to balance the account. And you say “this is justice”? Maybe it is.
Account. [Old English accompt, from ac – to add + compt – a calculation; from Latin
computo – to compute, reckon]
Right. Hebrew yaman - to be right; to be right handed; the right hand or right side; the
stronger; the South. Latin regere - to rule. Greek oregein - to stretch out]
Left. Hebrew semol - wrapping up; properly dark; as enveloped; the North, the left
side, the idea of cover, assuming the shape of the object beneath. [Anglo Saxon left –
worthless, from lef – weak, infirm.
Do you find it interesting to notice that the debits (debt) of an account are entered on the
“left” side meaning “worthless” and “assuming the shape” as in the court assuming you
will buy into the game that the name of the strawman has the same shape as your own?
But when you enter (the court) from the “right” side, it means “the stronger” and “to
rule”. It means “substance”, “reality”. It means “to make right”. Do you think that this is
a co-incidence? I think not.
Hearing. The parties proceeded against or otherwise involved have right to be heard,
in much the same manner as a trial and such proceedings may terminate a final
order.
Auditor. An officer of the court, assigned to state the items of debit and credit between
the parties in a suit where accounts are in question, and exhibit the balance. Under
Rules of Civil Procedure in many states, the term “master” is used to describe those
persons formerly known as auditors;
Magistrate. [L magister – a master, from magia – sorcery, from Greek mageia – the
theology of Magicians]
“master” includes a referee, and auditor, an examiner, and an assessor. The master shall
not retain the master’s report as security for the master’s compensation; but when the
party ordered to pay the compensation allowed by the court does not pay it after notice
and with the time prescribed by the court, the master is entitled to a writ of execution
against the delinquent party.
Wow! What officer of the court must state the items of debit and credit and exhibit the
balance? You got it, the magistrate holding out “the balance scales of justice”. What
happens when you are offered the “order to pay” and you do not pay (accept) it? You
dishonor, and you will get a writ of execution against you.
(c) Powers.
The master may require the production before the master of evidence upon all matters
embraced in the reference, including the production of all books, papers, vouchers,
documents, and writings applicable thereto.
If without adequate excuse a witness fails to appear or give evidence, the witness may
be punished as for a contempt and be subjected to the consequences, penalties, and
remedies provided in Rules 37 and 45.
When matters of accounting are in issue before the master, the master may prescribe the
form in which the accounts shall be submitted and in any proper case may require or
receive in evidence a statement by a certified public accountant who is called as a
witness.
(e) Report.
Who is the witness referred to here? It is the accountant or accounting that must provide
the court with evidence of the account of the Defendant/ Debtor/Strawman. If they do
not provide the court with this evidence, then they are in big trouble!
Account. A detailed statement of the mutual demands in the nature of debit and credit
between parties, arising out of contracts or some fiduciary relation.
In summary, when you ask for the “appearance bond” you are asking to bring evidence
into court of the account which shows the debt in order to test the claim without
submitting to such jurisdiction so that you can accept the charge and balance the
account.
Guilty. [Anglo Saxon gildan – to pay, payment] justly chargeable with a crime
(commercial liability);
What are you saying when you say “guilty”? Isn’t this a “bad” thing? As you well know,
all crimes are commercial liabilities. Instead of saying “I am guilty”, you are REALLY
saying “I am payment”. You are saying “the debtor is chargeable and I, as the creditor
am going to pay with my signature as payment, just like all the other credit that I have
created with my signature, which the municipalities and corporations have been
capitalizing on up to this point. You are saying, “I don’t have to get permission from
the Federal Reserve System to use MY OWN CREDIT. The Fed intentionally did NOT
print enough Federal Reserve Notes to cover the interest payments known as “income
taxes” (which creates the national debt), so I am bypassing them and their faulty
accounting system and will handle this matter myself as the principal to discharge the
national debt.”
One must admit that the idea behind this system we are speaking of is absolutely
brilliant, if not admirable. Who would have ever thought that the statement “I am
guilty” means “I am the creditor who can pay”? There is a universal principle at
work here, “what you resist persists,” but on the contrary, “what you accept and
admire disappears”!
Confession and avoidance. A plea in which one avows and confesses the truth of the
averments of fact in the complaint (liability) or declaration, either expressly or by
implication, but then proceeds to allege new matter which tends to deprive the facts
admitted of their ordinary legal effect, or to obviate, neutralize, or avoid them.
What “new matter” would this be in order to “neutralize” or balance the account?
How about requesting that the account evidencing debt be brought into court – the
APPEARANCE BOND! What happens when you sign your name on that bond?
Bingo! You just created credit, the account is balanced! The debt is now
discharged! The charges are dismissed! You see they needed the creditor to give his
approval/authority for a block of credit to be produced. That is why you get “court
orders”. They are really “money orders”. Remember, this is simply a commercial
transaction. They only want to get your signature to get more credit!
In other words, they are testing you to see if you know that you are the creditor. If
you don’t know then you aren’t one.
I just love the two words in the above definition, “issue” as in issue money, and
“tending” as in legal tender. This is becoming more and more obvious what the
courts are REALLY about. It has nothing to do with justice or the “law” only
about ACCOUNTING.
Now what happens when you deny or traverse or argue? You DISHONOR! And at that
point, all the rules go out the window. Whatever the “statute” says the fine is valued at
no longer matters. Its up to the “magistrate/master/auditor” to make the arbitrary value.
NO MERCY!
And what if you “cop a plea to a lesser charge”, you just lied! You just
DISHONORED! If they try to alter the plea, DON’T BUY IT! It is a trap to get
you to dishonor. You want to “accept” the exact charges that they “offered” to you.
Once you accept, the contract is yours. Not only that, but the one who makes the
charges then gets to pay the bill – not you. This would probably be the Secret
Service agent or IRS agent or Prosecutor. Is this country great or what?
What if you do not plead, so the magistrate enters a plea of “NOT GUILTY”? Then he
is saying “The man in front of me is not acting like a creditor so he is NOT ABLE TO
PAY and thus a debtor”. Now they will have to have a trial, as in a “trial balance” to
verify the debt.
Try. [French trier – to pick, cull, select, examine; from Latin tritum – to cleanse corn by
thrashing; from tra – to pierce] to purify, assay or refine as metals; to test or prove by
experiment; to subject to some severe test or experience; to examine or inquire into; a
process for testing qualification;
Trial balance. A listing of debit and credit balances of all ledger accounts; all accounts
with debit balances are totaled separately from accounts with credit balances. The two
totals should be equal.
Jury trial. A body of persons returned from the citizens of a particular district before a
court.
Return. Something which has had a prior existence will be brought or sent back. Profit
on sale, or income from investments. A schedule of information required by
governmental bodies, such as the tax return required by the Internal Revenue Service.
Grand jury. Body of citizens, the number of whom varies from state to state, whose
duties consist in determining whether probable cause exists that a crime (commercial
liability) has been committed and whether an indictment (true bill) should be returned
against one for such a crime.
See, they are still “trying” to get you to accept the charge so they “return” it to you to
give you another chance. It is part of the administrative procedure to give a second
notice. This is why they have to “try” you with a “trial”.
The jury must “find” a person guilty or not guilty so they can “convict” the defendant.
Finder. In intermediary who contracts to find, introduce, and bring together parties to
a business opportunity, leaving negotiation and consummation of transaction to the
principals. One who locates a particular type of business acquisition for a corporation
(USA).
Who would be the intermediary in this matter? The legislative, judicial and executive
systems. They bring some of the parties together in handcuffs, but they do the job. Now
you, the principal, can negotiate and consume the “business acquisition” attired in a
brilliant orange suit! What a “business opportunity” of a lifetime!
The main purpose of the trial by jury would be to act in the capacity of an accountant in
order to make a trial balance and validate the charge or fact on the debit side of the
account of the strawman/debtor to see if it is “accountable”. If they find the debtor “not
guilty” or not able to pay and its creditor does not come forth to sign for the debt, then
they throw the collateral in a warehouse for safekeeping. And WHO is the collateral
from their viewpoint? When you act like a debtor instead of the creditor, they think
YOU are the collateral of the strawman corporation.
So the moral of the story is ACCEPT and pay the debt, not DENY and dishonor.
Remember, what you resist persists – what you accept and admire disappears.
Here is a summary of what you say to the public officials when appropriate:
1. To the officer twho hands you a warrant, “I am accepting this charge and am now
returning it to you.”
2. To the magistrate on the phone, “I want closure on this matter and I do not intend
to dispute the facts. I request an appearance bond in order to plead. I request to be
released on my own recognizance until the hearing.”
3. To the magistrate at the court room, , “I want closure on this matter and I do not
intend to dispute the facts. I request an appearance bond without cost and that you
waive the fees on my own personal recognizance in order to plead.” When asked to
plead you say, “guilty.”
4. When you get the judgment, accept it for value and file it on a UCC-3 as now it
becomes your personal property. Now whoever makes the charges (the prosecutor
or county attorney, etc.) is the one who has to pay the debt.
DRILL: Drill the above scenarios with a friend being the officer or magistrate until you
have it down no matter what the circumstances.
Below is an interesting analogy of this scenario from II Chronicles 32:31. Read the
definitions before reading the verse in order to get a complete grasp of its meaning.
Ambassador. Hebrew luwts – to make mouths at, to scoff, to interpret, make a mock,
mocker.
Princes. Hebrew sar – a head person, chief, captain, governor, keeper, master.
Babylon. Heb Babel – confusion; from balal – to overflow, to mix, to feed cattle
Enquire. Heb darash – to tread or frequent, to follow (for pursuit or search), to seek or
ask, to worship.
worship. [Anglo Saxon weorthscipe – honor, weorth – worth, value + scipe – shape,
make, create]
Try. Hebrew nacah – to test, to attempt, adventure, assay, prove, tempt, try.
Heart. Heb lebab – the heart (as the most interior), courage, the mind.
DRILL: Compare the bible verse with the paragraph above it and spot the similarities.
Tried. Greek peirazo – to test, endeavor, scrutinize, entice, discipline, examine, prove;
from peira – through the idea of piercing, a test, an experience; from peiro – through,
across, cross over to the other side.
Crown. Greek stephanos – chaplet, wreath as a badge of royalty, a prize in the public
games or a symbol of honor.
Revelation 2:10 Fear none of those things which you shall suffer; behold, the
devil shall cast some of you into prison, that you may be tried; and you shall
have tribulation ten days; be faithful unto death and I will give you a crown of
life.
All of our lives we have been told that we are being tested, but did anyone really know
what this meant and what to do to pass it? Well, it appears this is a very important test,
an opportunity to see if you know who you really are. And if you are true to yourself
and continue on regardless of the consequences while playing in the “public games”,
you will keep your honor and as a Soveran, you will receive YOUR crown of life.