Name Weston Crump Period F _

AP Biology Date 7 December 2017 _

LAB : THE CHI-SQUARE TEST

Probability, Random Chance, and Genetics

Why do we study random chance and probability at the beginning of a unit on genetics?
Genetics is the study of inheritance, but it is also a study of probability. Most eukaryotic
organisms are diploid, meaning that each cell contains two copies of every chromosome, so
there are two copies of each gene that controls a trait (alleles). In sexual reproduction, these
two copies of each chromosome separate, and are randomly sorted into the reproductive cells
(gametes). When gametes from two different parents combine in fertilization, new combinations
of alleles are created. Thus chance plays a major role in determining which alleles, and
therefore which combinations of traits end up in each new individual. The important point is that
the inheritance of characteristics is the result of random chance. Therefore, it is important to
understand the nature of chance and probability and the resulting implications for the science of
genetics. In short, the genes that an individual organism inherits depends on the “luck of the
draw,” and the luck of the draw is dependent on the laws of probability.

The Laws of Probability

There are three Laws of Probability that are important in genetics and they can be easily
demonstrated using simple models like flipping a coin or choosing cards from a deck:
• The Rule of Independent Events: Past events have no influence on future
events.
Question: If a coin is tossed 5 times, and each time a head appears, then what is
the chance that the next toss will be heads?
Answer: 1/2 (1 chance in 2), because coins have 2 sides.
• The Rule of Multiplication: The chance that two or more independent events
will occur together is equal to the product of the probabilities of each individual
event.
Question: What are the chances of drawing a red nine from a standard deck of
cards?
Answer: 1/26 (1 chance in 26), because there is 1/2 chance of drawing a red
card and 1 chance in 13 of drawing a nine. Therefore, 1/2 x 1/13 = 1/26 or 1
chance in 26 of drawing a red nine.
• The Rule of Addition: The chance of an event occurring when that event can
occur two or more different ways is equal to the sum of the probabilities of each
individual event
Question: If 2 coins are tossed, what is the chance that the toss will yield 2 unmatched
coins (1 head & 1 tail)?
Answer: 1/2 (1 chance in 2) because the combination of 2 unmatched coins can
come about in 2 ways: Result A (coin #1 heads, coin #2 tails) as well as Result B
(coin #1 tails, coin #2 heads). Therefore (1/2 x 1/2) + (1/2 x 1/2) = 1/2, or the
chance of Result A plus the chance of Result B.

1 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

Paired Coins and Genetics

Using paired coins, in fact, mimics genetics closely. Each coin can serve as the model for a
gamete during fertilization, because it’s the ”luck of the draw” governing which sperm fertilizes
which egg.
When you toss two coins, there are three possible outcomes:
• 2 heads
• 2 tails
• 1 head, 1 tail
The probability of each of these outcomes is based on the 3 Laws of Probability we just
discussed:
• 2 heads: 1/4 chance
1/2 heads on coin #1 x 1/2 heads on coin #2 = 1/4,
which is generalized as p2 because [p x p = p2]
• 2 tails: 1/4 chance
1/2 tails on coin #1 x 1/2 tails on coin #2 = 1/4,
which is generalized as q2 because [q x q = q2]
• 1 head, 1 tail: 1/2 chance
(1/2 heads on coin #1 x 1/2 tails on coin #2) + (1/2 tails on coin #1 x 1/2 heads on coin #2),
which is generalized as 2pq because [(p x q) + (q x p) = 2pq]
Therefore, all the expected results from tossing two coins can be summarized as follows:

2 2
p + 2pq + q = 1
(double heads) + (heads/tails) + (double tails) = 100%

You will see this formula again when we learn about genetics of populations, so it would be
good to become familiar with it now.

Lab Activity

1. Divide the class into 10 teams.

2. Each team of students will toss a pair of coins exactly 100 times and record the results on
the data table labeled “Team Data.” Each team must check their results to be certain that
they have exactly 100 tosses.

3. Record your team results on the chalkboard and then record the summarized results on
the data table labeled “Class Data.”

4. Analyze both the team data and the class data separately using the Chi-square analysis
explained below.

2 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

Chi-square Analysis
The Chi-square is a statistical test that makes a comparison between the data collected in an
experiment versus the data you expected to find. It is used beyond genetics studies and can be
used whenever you want to compare the differences between expected results and
experimental data.
Variability is always present in the real world. If you toss a coin 10 times, you will often get a
result different than 5 heads and 5 tails. The Chi-square test is a way to evaluate this variability
to get an idea if the difference between real and expected results are due to normal random
chance, or if there is some other factor involved (like an unbalanced coin).
Genetics uses the Chi-square to evaluate data from experimental crosses to determine if the
assumed genetic explanation is supported by the data. In the case of genetics (and coin tosses)
the expected results can be calculated using the Laws of Probability (and possibly the help of a
Punnett square). The Chi-square test helps you to decide if the difference between your
observed results and your expected results is probably due to random chance alone, or if there
is some other factor influencing the results.
• Is the variance in your data probably due to random chance alone and therefore
your hypothesis about the genetics of a trait is supported by the data?
• Are the differences between the observed and expected results probably not due
to random chance alone, and your hypothesis about the genetics of a trait is
thereby not supported by the data?
• Should you consider an alternative inheritance mechanism to explain the results?
The Chi-square test will not, in fact, prove or disprove if random chance is the only thing causing
observed differences, but it will give an estimate of the likelihood that chance alone is at work.

Determining the Chi-square Value

Chi-square is calculated based on the formula below:
(observed – expected) 2
X 2
= ∑ expected

A. For your individual team results, complete column A of the Chi-square Analysis Data
Table by entering your observed results in the coin toss exercise.

B. For your individual team results, complete column B of the Chi-square Analysis Data
Table by entering your expected results in the coin toss exercise.

C. For your individual team results, complete column C of the Chi-square Analysis Data
Table by calculating the difference between your observed and expected results.

D. For your individual team results, complete column D of the Chi-square Analysis Data
Table by calculating the square of the difference between your observed and expected
results. (This is done to force the result to be a positive number.)

E. For your individual team results, complete column E of the Chi-square Analysis Data
Table by dividing the square in column D by the expected results.

3 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

F. Calculate the X2 value by summing each of the answers in column E. The ∑ symbol
means summation.

G. Repeat these calculations for the full class data and complete the Class Data Chi-square
Analysis Table.

H. Enter the “Degrees of Freedom” based on the explanation below.

Interpreting the Chi Square Value

With the Chi-square calculation table completed, you would look up your Chi-square value on
the Chi-square Distribution table at the back of this lab. But to know which column and row to
use on that chart, you must now determine the degrees of freedom to be used and the
acceptable probability that the Chi-square you obtained is caused by chance alone or by other
factors. The following two steps will help you to determine the degrees of freedom and the
probability.

Degrees of Freedom
Which row do we use in the Chi-square Distribution table?
The rows in the Chi-square Distribution table refer to degrees of freedom. The degrees
of freedom are calculated as the one less than the number of possible results in your
experiment.
In the double coin toss exercise, you have 3 possible results: two heads, two tails, or
one of each. Therefore, there are two degrees of freedom for this experiment.
In a sense degrees of freedom is measuring how many classes of results can “freely”
vary their numbers. In other words, if you have an accurate count of how many 2-heads,
and 2-tails tosses were observed, then you already know how many of the 100 tosses
ended up as mixed head-tails, so the third measurement provides no additional
information.

Probability = p
Which column do we use in the Chi-square Distribution table?
The columns in the Chi-square Distribution table with the decimals from .99 through .50
to .01 refer to probability levels of the Chi-square.
For instance, 3 events were observed in our coin toss exercise, so we already calculated
we would use 2 degrees of freedom. If we calculate a Chi-square value of 1.386 from the
experiment, then when we look this up on the Chi-square Distribution chart, we find that
our Chi-square value places us in the “p=.50” column. This means that the variance
between our observed results and our expected results would occur from random
chance alone about 50% of the time. Therefore, we could conclude that chance alone
could cause such a variance often enough that the data still supported our hypothesis,
and probably another factor is not influencing our coin toss results.
However, if our calculated Chi-square value, yielded a sum of 5.991 or higher, then
when we look this up on the Chi-square Distribution chart, we find that our Chi-square
value places us in the “p=.05” column. This means that the variance between our
observed results and our expected results would occur from random chance alone only
about 5% of the time (only 1 out of every 20 times). Therefore, we would conclude that

4 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

chance factors alone are not likely to be the cause of this variance. Some other factor is
causing some coin combinations to come up more than would be expected. Maybe our
coins are not balanced and are weighted to one side more than another.
So what value of Probability (p) is acceptable in scientific research?
Biologists generally accept p=.05 as the cutoff for accepting or rejecting a hypothesis. If the
difference between your observed data and your expected data would occur due to chance
alone fewer than 1 time in 20 (p = 0.05, or 5%) then the acceptability of your hypothesis may be
questioned. In other words, there’s a 95% that the differences between your observed and your
expected data are due to some other factor beyond chance. Biologists consider a p value of .05
or less to be a “statistically significant” difference.
A probability of more than 0.05 by no means proves that the hypothesis from which you worked
is correct but merely tells you that from a statistical standpoint that it could be correct, and that
the variation from your expected results is probably due to random chance alone. Furthermore, a
probability of less than 0.05 does not prove that a hypothesis is incorrect; it merely suggests that
you have reason to doubt the correctness or completeness of one or more of the
assumptions on which your hypothesis is based. At that point, it would be wise as a researcher
to explore alternative hypotheses.

Null hypothesis
So how is this directly applied to genetics research?
In classical genetics research where you are trying to determine the inheritance pattern of a
phenotype, you establish your predicted genetic explanation and the expected phenotype ratios
in the offspring as your hypothesis. For example, you think a mutant trait in fruit flies is a simple
dominant inheritance. To test this you would set up a cross between 2 true-breeding flies:
mutant female x wild type male
You would then predict the ratios of phenotypes you would expect from this cross. This then
establishes an hypothesis that any difference from these results will not be significant and will
be due to random chance alone. This is referred to as your “null hypothesis”. It, in essence,
says that you propose that nothing else — no other factors — are creating the variation in your
results except for random chance differences.
After the cross, you would then compare your observed results against your expected results
and complete a Chi-square analysis. If the p value is determined to be greater than .05 then you
would accept your null hypothesis (differences are due to random chance alone) and your
genetic explanation for this trait is supported. If the p value is determined to be .05 or less then
you would reject your null hypothesis — random chance alone can only explain this level of difference
fewer than 1 time out of every 20 times — and your genetic explanation for this trait is unsupported.
You therefore have to consider alternative factors influencing the inheritance of the mutant trait.
You would repeat this cycle of prediction-hypothesis-analysis for each of your crosses in your genetic
research.

Stating conclusions
Once you have collected your data and analyzed them using the Chi-square test, you are ready
to determine whether your original hypothesis is supported or not. If the p value in your Chi-
square test is .05 or less (.05, .01, etc.) then the data do not support your null hypothesis that

5 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

nothing else but random chance is at work here. So, as a scientist, you would state your
"acceptable" results from the Chi-square analysis in this way:
"The differences observed in the data were not statistically significant at the .05
level." You could then add a statement like, "Therefore the data support the
hypothesis that..."
And you will see that over and over again in the conclusions of research papers.
This is how a scientist would state "unacceptable" results from the Chi-square analysis:
"The differences observed in the data were statistically significant at the .05
level." You could then add a statement like, "Therefore the data do not support
the hypothesis that..."

N.B.: Do not forget in your writings that the word "data" is plural (datum is singular & rarely
used).
"Data are" is correct.
"Data is" is not correct.

6 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

TEAM DATA

Toss H/H H/T T/T Toss H/H H/T T/T Toss H/H H/T T/T
1 35 69
2 36 70
3 37 71
4 38 72
5 39 73
6 40 74
7 41 75
8 42 76
9 43 77
10 44 78
11 45 79
12 46 80
13 47 81
14 48 82
15 49 83
16 50 84
17 51 85
18 52 86
19 53 87
20 54 88
21 55 89
22 56 90
23 57 91
24 58 92
25 59 93
26 60 94
27 61 95
28 62 96
29 63 97
30 64 98
31 65 99
32 66 100
33 67 — — — —
34 68 Total*
* The sum of the total of each column must equal 100 tosses.

7 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

CLASS DATA (replaced group 10 with our data)

Totals
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Obs Exp
H/H
H/T
T/T
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1000 1000

TEAM DATA: CHI SQUARE ANALYSIS

A B C D E
(Obs – Exp)2
Obs Exp Obs - Exp (Obs – Exp)2
Exp
H/H
H/T
T/T
X2 Total
Degrees of Freedom

CLASS DATA: CHI SQUARE ANALYSIS

A B C D E
(Obs – Exp)2
Obs Exp Obs - Exp (Obs – Exp)2
Exp
H/H
H/T
T/T
X2 Total
Degrees of Freedom

8 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION TABLE

Degrees
Probability (p) value
of
ACCEPT NULL HYPOTHESIS REJECT
freedom
0.95 0.80 0.70 0.50 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.05 0.01 0.005
1 0.004 0.06 0.15 0.46 1.07 1.64 2.71 3.84 6.64 7.88
2 0.10 0.45 0.71 1.30 2.41 3.22 4.60 5.99 9.21 10.59
3 0.35 1.00 1.42 2.37 3.67 4.64 6.25 7.82 11.34 12.38
4 0.71 1.65 2.20 3.36 4.88 5.99 7.78 9.49 13.28 14.86
5 1.14 2.34 3.00 4.35 6.06 7.29 9.24 11.07 15.09 16.75
6 1.64 3.07 3.38 5.35 7.23 8.56 10.65 12.59 16.81 18.55
7 2.17 3.84 4.67 6.35 8.38 9.80 12.02 14.07 18.48 20.28

In scientific research, the probability value of 0.05 is taken as the common cut off level of
significance. A probability value (p-value) of .05 means that there is a 5% chance that the
difference between the observed and the expected data is a random difference, and a 95%
chance that the difference is real and repeatable — in other words, a significant difference.
Therefore, if your p-value is greater than .05, you would accept the null hypothesis: “The
difference between my observed results and my expected results are due to random chance
alone and are not significant.”
In genetics experiments (like your upcoming Fly Lab), accepting the null hypothesis would mean
that your data are supporting your proposal for the genetics and inheritance scheme for the flies
that you were breeding.
In medical research, the chi-square test is used in a similar — but interestingly different — way.
When a scientist is testing a new drug, the experiment is set up so that the control group
receives a placebo and the experimental group receives the new drug. Analysis of the data is
trying to see if there is a difference between the two groups. The expected values would be that
the same number of people get better in the two groups — which would mean that the drug has
no effect. If the chi-square test yields a p-value greater than .05, then the scientist would accept
the null hypothesis which would mean the drug has no significant effect. The differences
between the expected and the observed data could be due to random chance alone. If the chi-
square test yields a p-value ≤ .05, then the scientist would reject the null hypothesis which
would mean the drug has a significant effect. The differences between the expected and the
observed data could not be due to random chance alone and can be assumed to have come
from the drug treatment.
In fact, chi-square analysis tables can go to much lower p-values than the one above — they
could have p-values of .001 (1 in 1000 chance), .0001 (1 in 10,000 chance), and so forth. For
example, a p-value of .0001 would mean that there would only be a 1 in 10,000 chance that the
differences between the expected and the observed data were due to random chance alone,
whereas there is a 99.99% chance that the difference is really caused by the treatment. These
results would be considered highly significant.

9 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
 Name Weston Crump AP Biology

QUESTIONS

1. What is the Chi-square test used for? Chi-square test is used for comparing data that you

have observed first-hand to data that is expected before the experiment has begun.

2. Why is probability important in genetics? Probability is very important in genetics because

the genes that you receive from your parents can be predicted through probability.

3. Briefly describe how the Chi-square analysis may be used in genetics.

The Chi-squared analysis may be used in genetics so that you can compare the actual data

of the total amount of genes in the offspring with the expected outcome.

4. Suppose you were to obtain a Chi-square value of 7.82 or greater in your data analysis (with
2 degrees of freedom). What would this indicate?

This value would indicate that the difference in expected outcome is definitely real and is
repeats a lot, not just by random factors. This can also indicate that the null hypothesis is then
rejected.

5. Suppose you were to obtain a Chi-square value of 4.60 or lower in your data analysis (with 2
degrees of freedom). What would this indicate?

The lower value would show that the results are not significant. It also indicates that it
involves random chance, which would accept the null hypothesis.

6. A heterozygous white-fruited squash plant is crossed with a yellow-fruited plant, yielding 200
seeds. Of these, 110 produce white-fruited plants while only 90 produce yellow-fruited
plants. Are these results statistically significant? Explain using Chi-square analysis.

Here, we expected there to be 100 white plants and 100 yellow plants and this causes the Chi-
sqaured number to equal 3.84. Now this means that the hypothesis is accepted and the results
are statistically significant.

10 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

7. What if there were 2000 seeds and 1100 produced white-fruited plants & 900 yellow-fruited?
Are these results statistically significant? Explain using Chi-square analysis.

Yes these results would be statistically significant because the ratio here is still exactly the
same as #6 (number six).

8. TEAM DATA: What was your hypothesis (expected values) for your individual team coin
toss?

We expected from our hypothesis 25 H/H, 50 H/T, and 25 T/T.

What was your calculated Chi-square value for your individual team data? 0.245

What p value does this Chi-square correspond to? 0.95

Was your hypothesis supported by your results? Explain using your Chi-square analysis.

Our results that we got supported our hypothesis because our p value is greater than .05,
which then makes our hypothesis acceptable.

9. CLASS DATA: What was your hypothesis (expected values) for the class coin toss?

Our hypothesis and what we expected was 250 H/H, 500 H/T, and 250 T/T.

What was your calculated Chi-square value for the class data? 1.829

What p value does this Chi-square correspond to? 0.5

Was your hypothesis supported by the results? Explain using your Chi-square analysis.

The hypothesis we used was supported by the results because our p value was truly greater
than .05.

11 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

10. When scientists design research studies they purposely choose large sample sizes. Work
through these scenarios to see why:

a. Just as in your experiment, you flipped 2 coins, but you only did it 10 times. You
collected these data below. Use the chart to calculate the Chi-square value:
(Obs – Exp)2
Obs Exp Obs - Exp (Obs – Exp)2
Exp
H/H 1
H/T 8
T/T 1
X2 Total

Would you accept or reject the null hypothesis? Explain using your Chi-square analysis.

I would accept the null hypothesis because the p value is .5 and also greater than .05.

b. Now you flipped your 2 coins again, but you did it 100 times. You collected these data
below. Use the chart to calculate the Chi-square value:
(Obs – Exp)2
Obs Exp Obs - Exp (Obs – Exp)2
Exp
H/H 10
H/T 80
T/T 10
X2 Total

Would you accept or reject the null hypothesis? Explain using your Chi-square analysis.

Reject, because the p value is very slightly less than .05.

12 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006
Name Weston Crump AP Biology

c. Now you flipped your 2 coins again, but you did it 1000 times. You collected these data
below. Use the chart to calculate the Chi-square value:
(Obs – Exp)2
Obs Exp Obs - Exp (Obs – Exp)2
Exp
H/H 100
H/T 800
T/T 100
X2 Total

Would you accept or reject the null hypothesis? Explain using your Chi-square analysis.
I would now reject this null hypothesis because the p value is now much smaller than .05.

d. Now, using your understanding of the Chi-square test, explain why scientists purposely
choose large sample sizes when they design research studies.

Now, using my iunderstandin of the Chi-square test, scientists purposely choose the large
sample sizes because the larger the sample size is, the less of a chance there is of
error because of random chance or just luck. This is true because of the Chi-squared
test, because it then became much more precise when the sample size was increased.

13 of 13
Adapted by Kim B. Foglia • www.ExploreBiology.com • 2005-2006