S E D OF Mechaincal Engineering: Athmandu Niversity
S E D OF Mechaincal Engineering: Athmandu Niversity
S E D OF Mechaincal Engineering: Athmandu Niversity
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF MECHAINCAL ENGINEERING
PROJECT REPORT
July 15,2017.
AUTHORIZATION
by
Sujan Shrestha.
Suman Thapa.
Samip Timilsina.
This is to certify that I have examined the above Project and have found that it is
complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the
thesis examination committee have been made. This page is centre aligned, not
justified.
_________________________________________
Er. Hari Dhakal
_________________________________________
Hari Pd Neupane,HOD
July 2017
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I am highly indebted to the help of project supervisor and project coordinator of the
department of Mechanical Engineering, Kathmandu University.
I express heartily thank to the project group of ME-1 2016, School of Engineering
Kathmandu University providing with the help in the project.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………….…………………….. v
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………vi
APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................. 19
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
iii
LIST OF TABLES
iv
ABSTRACT
v
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
vi
LIST OF SYMBOLS
A Ampere [A]
R Radius [L]
2 -3 -1
V Voltage [ML T A ]
7
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
History
It is found that electromagnetic brakes can develop a negative power which represents
nearly twice the maximum power output of a typical engine, and at least three times the braking
power of an exhaust brake. (Reverdin 1994). These performance of electromagnetic brakes make
them much more competitive candidate for alternative retardation equipments compared with
other retarders. By using by using the electromagnetic brakes are supplementary retardation
equipment, the friction brakes can be used less frequently, and therefore practically never reach
high temperatures. The brake linings would last considerably longer before requiring
maintenance and the potentially “brake fade” problem could be avoided. In research conducted
by a truck manufacturer, it was proved that the electromagnetic brake assumed 80% of the duty
which would otherwise have been demanded of the regular service brake (Reverdin 1974).
Further more the electromagnetic brakes prevents the danger that can arise from the prolonged
use of brake beyond their capability to dissipate heat. This is most likely to occur while a vehicle
descending a long gradient at high speed. Ina study with a vehicle with 5 axles and weighting 40
tones powered by a powered by an engine of 310 b.h.p travelling down a gradient of 6% at a
steady speed between 35 and 40 m.h.p, it can be calculated that the braking power necessary to
maintain this speed ot the order of 450 hp. The brakes, therefore, would have to absorb 300 hp,
meaning that each brake in the 5 axels must absorb 30 hp, that a friction brake can normally
absorb with selfdestruction. The magnetic brake is wall suited to such conditions since it will
8
independently absorb more than 300 hp (Reverdin 1974). It therefore can exceed the
requirements of continuous uninterrupted braking, leaving the friction brakes cool and ready for
emergency braking in total safety. The installation of an electromagnetic brake is not very
difficulty if there is enough space between the gearbox and the rear axle. If did not need a
subsidiary cooling system. It relay on the efficiency of engine components for its use, so do
exhaust and hydrokinetic brakes. The exhaust brake is an on/off device and hydrokinetic brakes
have very complex control system. The electromagnetic brake control system is an electric
switching system which gives it superior controllability.
9
1.3 Types of Braking System
x
1.2 Objectives
Primary Objective
The main objective of our project is to design and fabricate an
Electromagnetic Braking System model.
Secondary Objective
Besides the main objective, following are our secondary objectives:
1. To understand project planning and execution
2. To understand the fabrication techniques in a mechanical workshop
3. To understand the usage of various mechanical machine tools and also
measuring tools
4. To make day to day human life more easier by proper use of technology
1.5 Limitations:
xi
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
xii
1) Driving Unit
a) Electric Motor
An Electric motor is an electrical device that converts electrical energy into
mechanical energy. In normal motoring mode, most electric motors operate through
the interaction between an electric motor's magnetic field and winding currents to
generate force within the motor. Electric motors may be classified by electric power
source type, internal construction, application, type of motion output, and so on.
b) Wheel
Wheel gets in motion with the help of running motor. Both motor and wheel is
connected with the help of connecting chain and chain ring.
c) Power control
This division consists of power supply to whole system and a separate power
control system to control the motion of motion.
xiii
2) Braking Unit
a) Electromagnet
b) Brake Shoe
It is part that will stop the main wheel when the electromagnet is turned on.
3) Other parts
Spring:
A coil spring, also known as a helical spring, is a mechanical device which is typically
used to store energy and subsequently release it, to absorb shock, or to maintain aforce
between contacting surfaces. : Two compression springs are used to push back the
brake shoe back in its position.
xiv
Bearing:
The purpose of Ball Bearing is to reduce rotational friction and support radial and
axial loads.In this project 608 2RS type of bearing is used.
xv
2.2 Working Mechanism
xvi
Chapter 3 FABRICATION
a) Base plank
It consists of rectangular wooden plank which acts as a base for all the
component of EMBS. It will have dimension of 80*50*1 cm.
b) Electric motor
DC Wiper motors is used to move the wheel .
xvii
c) Electromagnet:
xviii
Chapter 4 CALCULATIONS
1
Magnetic force produced (B)=µIN
=4π*10⁻ ⁷ *2*550
=0.00138 T which is magnetic force produced by one
electromagnet as we are using two electromagnets so our total force will be
Total Magnetic force(B)=2*B
=0.00276 T.
2.
Total Force produced(F)=(B*B*A)/(µG*G)
=0.00276*226.194/50.265
=171.396 N
3.
Resistance of wire(R)=ρL/A
=1.7*10⁻ ⁸ *13.8/0.503
=0.466 Ω
4.
Heat produced(H)=I*I*R*T
=2*2*0.466*60
=112 J
Where I is current,
N is number of turns,
A is cross sectional area,
G is the gap between magnet and iron,
R is the resistance of copper wire,
L is the length of copper wire,
ρ is the resistivity of copper,
T is time in seconds.
xix
Chapter 5 GANTT CHART
Table 5: Gantt Chart for Second Semester
Weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Literature
review
Consultation
Proposal
submission
Material
selection and
purchase.
Model design
and
Construction
Midterm
presentation
Testing and
Debugging
Demonstration
Report
submission
and final
submission
Work
Completed
Work
Remaining
xx
CHAPTER 6 BUDGET ESTIMATION
xxi
CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
[1] Journal- Eddy Current in Magnetic Brakes- Henry A. Sudano and Jae Sung Bae
[2] Design of a magnetic braking system, Min Jou, Jaw-Kuen Shiau,Chi-Chian Sun
[3] Analysis of an eddy-current brake considering finite radius and induced magnetic
flux- Journal of Applied Physics, Kapjin Lee, Kyihwan Pa
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
1