TGM - Petrochemical Complexes - 160910 - NK PDF

TECHNICAL EIA GUIDANCE MANUAL
FOR
PETROCHEMICAL COMPLEXES
Prepared for
Government of India
Project Coordination Dr. Nalini Bhat
Ministry of Environment & Forests Advisor, Ministry of Environment and Forests
Dr. T. Chandni
Director, Ministry of Environment and Forests
Core Project Coordination Team Mr. Mahesh Babu

IL&FS Environment CEO
Mr. N. Sateesh Babu
Vice President & Project Director
Ms. Chaitanya Vangeti
Assistant Manager
Ms. Suman Benedicta Thomas
Technical Writer
Expert Resource Person Prof. I. D. Mall

Professor & Head – Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Roorkee
Expert Core & Peer Committee
Chairman Dr. V. Rajagopalan, IAS
Additional Secretary
Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers
Core Members Dr. R. K. Garg
Former Chairman, EIA Committee, Ministry of Environment and
Forests
Mr. Paritosh C. Tyagi
Former Chairman, Central Pollution Control Board
Prof. S.P. Gautam
Chairman, Central Pollution Control Board
Dr. Tapan Chakrabarti
Director, National Environmental Engineering Research Institute
Mr. K. P. Nyati
Chief Executive Officer – Sustainable Mining Initiative
Dr. G.K. Pandey
Former Advisor, Ministry of Environment and Forests
Dr. Nalini Bhat
Advisor, Ministry of Environment and Forests
Dr. G.V. Subramaniam
Advisor, Ministry of Environment and Forests
Dr. B. Sengupta
Former Member Secretary, Central Pollution Control Board
Dr. R. C. Trivedi
Former Scientist, Central Pollution Control Board
Peer Member Dr. Hemant G. Jogleker
Former Senior Scientist, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune
Dr. P. N. Sharma
Scientist & Head - Bio-Environmental Engineering Centre (BEEC),
Indian Institute of Chemical Technology (IICT)
Member Convener Mr. N. Sateesh Babu
Project Director
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION TO THE TECHNICAL EIA GUIDANCE MANUALS PROJECT 1-1

1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1-2
1.2 Project Implementation ....................................................................................................... 1-4
1.3 Additional Information........................................................................................................ 1-4
2. CONCEPTUAL FACETS OF EIA 2-1
2.1 Environment in EIA Context............................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Pollution Control Strategies ................................................................................................ 2-2
2.3 Tools for Preventive Environmental Management.............................................................. 2-2
2.3.1 Tools for assessment and analysis ....................................................................... 2-3
2.3.2 Tools for action.................................................................................................... 2-5
2.3.3 Tools for communication................................................................................... 2-10
2.4 Objectives of EIA.............................................................................................................. 2-10
2.5 Types of EIA ..................................................................................................................... 2-11
2.6 Basic EIA Principles ......................................................................................................... 2-12
2.7 Project Cycle ..................................................................................................................... 2-13
2.8 Environmental Impacts ..................................................................................................... 2-13
2.8.1 Direct impacts.................................................................................................... 2-14
2.8.2 Indirect impacts ................................................................................................. 2-14
2.8.3 Cumulative impacts ........................................................................................... 2-15
2.8.4 Induced impacts................................................................................................. 2-15
2.9 Significance of Impacts ..................................................................................................... 2-16
2.9.1 Criteria/methodology to determine the significance of the identified impacts.. 2-17
3. ABOUT PETROCHEMICAL COMPLEXES INCLUDING PROCESS AND POLLUTION
CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 3-1
3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1.1 Petrochemical capacities...................................................................................... 3-1
3.1.2 Feedstock processed ............................................................................................ 3-2
3.1.3 Status of technology ............................................................................................ 3-3
3.1.4 Scope of coverage of chemicals under the petrochemical complexes................. 3-5
3.1.5 Production patterns .............................................................................................. 3-5
3.2 Feedstock Processing .......................................................................................................... 3-6
3.2.1 Lower olefins production- steam cracking .......................................................... 3-6
3.2.2 Aromatics........................................................................................................... 3-10
3.3 Water and Wastewater Management................................................................................. 3-14
3.3.1 Sources of wastewater generation ..................................................................... 3-14
3.3.2 Control & treatment technology ........................................................................ 3-16
3.4 Air Pollution...................................................................................................................... 3-22
3.4.1 Ethylene cracker ................................................................................................ 3-24
3.4.2 Aromatics plants ................................................................................................ 3-26
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes i September 2010

Table of Contents
3.4.3 Control technologies for air emissions .............................................................. 3-26

3.4.4 VOC emissions .................................................................................................. 3-37
3.4.5 Monitoring & reporting of air emissions ........................................................... 3-39
3.5 Energy and Fuel Management........................................................................................... 3-41
3.5.1 Environmental considerations ........................................................................... 3-41
3.6 Non-routine conditions...................................................................................................... 3-41
3.6.1 Unplanned events .............................................................................................. 3-42
3.7 Waste management ........................................................................................................... 3-42
3.7.1 Solid/hazardous waste generation from ethylene cracker.................................. 3-42
3.7.2 Solid/hazardous waste generation from aromatics plants.................................. 3-43
3.7.3 Composition of petrochemical industry waste streams ..................................... 3-43
3.7.4 Technology for waste treatment ........................................................................ 3-44
3.7.5 Waste storage..................................................................................................... 3-46
3.7.6 Recycle and reuse .............................................................................................. 3-46
3.7.7 Waste pre-treatment- sludge reduction processes.............................................. 3-46
3.7.8 Waste disposal methods..................................................................................... 3-47
3.8 Summary of Applicable National Regulations.................................................................. 3-47
3.8.1 General description of major statutes ................................................................ 3-47
3.8.2 General standards for discharge of environmental pollutants ........................... 3-47
3.8.3 Industry-specific requirements .......................................................................... 3-47
3.8.4 Pending and proposed regulatory requirements................................................. 3-48
4. OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF EIA 4-1
4.1 Coverage of the Industry under the Purview of Notification .............................................. 4-1
4.1.1 Application for prior environmental clearance.................................................... 4-3
4.1.2 Siting guidelines .................................................................................................. 4-3
4.2 Scoping for EIA Studies...................................................................................................... 4-4
4.2.1 Pre-feasibility report ............................................................................................ 4-5
4.2.2 Guidance for providing information in Form 1 ................................................... 4-7
4.2.3 Identification of appropriate valued environmental components ........................ 4-7
4.2.4 Methods for identification of impacts.................................................................. 4-7
4.2.5 Testing the Significance of Impacts .................................................................. 4-13
4.2.6 Terms of reference for EIA studies ................................................................... 4-13
4.3 Environmental Impact Assessment ................................................................................... 4-18
4.3.1 EIA team............................................................................................................ 4-19
4.3.2 Baseline quality of the environment .................................................................. 4-19
4.3.3 Impact prediction tools ...................................................................................... 4-22
4.3.4 Significance of the impacts................................................................................ 4-22
4.4 Social Impact Assessment ................................................................................................. 4-23
4.5 Risk Assessment................................................................................................................ 4-26
4.5.1 Storage and handling of hazardous materials .................................................... 4-30
4.5.2 Hazard identification ......................................................................................... 4-30
4.5.3 Hazard assessment and evaluation..................................................................... 4-30
4.5.4 Disaster management plan (DMP)..................................................................... 4-32
4.6 Mitigation Measures.......................................................................................................... 4-36
4.6.1 Important considerations for mitigation methods.............................................. 4-36
4.6.2 Hierarchy of elements of mitigation plan .......................................................... 4-37
4.6.3 Typical mitigation measures.............................................................................. 4-39
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes ii September 2010

Table of Contents
4.7 Environmental Management Plan ..................................................................................... 4-42

4.8 Reporting........................................................................................................................... 4-43
4.9 Public Consultation ........................................................................................................... 4-45
4.10 Appraisal ........................................................................................................................... 4-48
4.11 Decision Making ............................................................................................................... 4-50
4.12 Post-clearance Monitoring Protocol.................................................................................. 4-51
5. STAKEHOLDERS’ ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5-1
5.1 EAC..................................................................................................................................... 5-3
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes iii September 2010

Table of Contents
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1: Major Petrochemical Product Capacities & Production Units .......................................... 3-2
Table 3-2: Feedstock for Major Petrochemical Complexes................................................................ 3-2
Table 3-3: Comparison of Feedstock – Energy consumption ............................................................. 3-3
Table 3-4: Feedstock based Differences in Cracking Unit Processes................................................. 3-7
Table 3-5: Pollutants into Water and Air Environment from Various Processes in Petrochemical
Complex Production ....................................................................................................... 3-14
Table 3-6: Selection of Appropriate Control Technique................................................................... 3-27
Table 3-7: Levels of Control for Atmospheric Emissions ................................................................ 3-38
Table 3-8: Technology Levels for API (Oil/Water) Separator Sludge ............................................. 3-44
Table 3-9: Technology Levels for Temporary Waste Storage.......................................................... 3-45
Table 3-10: Petrochemicals (Basic & Intermediates): Standards for Liquid Effluent ...................... 3-47
Table 3-11: Emission Standards for Heater/Furnace/Boilers/Vaporizers ......................................... 3-48
Table 3-12: Emission Standards for Organic Particulates ................................................................ 3-48
Table 3-13: Emission Standards for Process Emission (Specific Organic Pollutants) ..................... 3-48
Table 3-14: Emission Standards for VOC-HAPs from Process Vents ............................................. 3-49
Table 3-15: Emission Standards for VOC (General) from Process Vents........................................ 3-49
Table 3-16: Standards for Atmospheric Storage Tanks of Petrochemical Products ........................ 3-49
Table 3-17: Storage of Benzene, VCM and ACN............................................................................. 3-50
Table 3-18: Standards for Emission from Loading of Volatile Products.......................................... 3-50
Table 3-19: HAP and Volatile HAP Concentrations in LDAR Components ................................... 3-51
Table 3-20: Frequency of Monitoring of Leaks and Schedule for Repair of Leaks ......................... 3-51
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes iv September 2010

Table of Contents
Table 3-21: Methods for Measurement of Pollutant Concentrations in the Emissions ................... 3-52
Table 4-1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Impact Identification Methods ................................... 4-8
Table 4-2: Matrix of Impacts ............................................................................................................ 4-10
Table 4-3: List of Important Physical Environment Components and Indicators of EBM.............. 4-20
Table 4-4: Choice of Models for Impact Predictions: Risk Assessment.......................................... 4-27
Table 4-5: Typical Mitigation Measures........................................................................................... 4-40
Table 4-6: Structure of EIA Report................................................................................................... 4-44
Table 5-1: Roles and Responsibilities of Stakeholders Involved in Prior Environmental Clearance 5-1
Table 5-2: Organization-specific Functions........................................................................................ 5-2
Table 5-3: EAC: Eligibility Criteria for Chairperson / Members / Secretary ..................................... 5-5
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes v September 2010

Table of Contents
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Inclusive Components of Sustainable Development........................................................ 2-1
Figure 2-2: Types of Impacts ............................................................................................................ 2-14
Figure 2-3: Cumulative Impact ......................................................................................................... 2-15
Figure 3-1: Coverage of Chemicals under Petrochemical Complexes Industry ................................. 3-5
Figure 3-2: Naphtha Cracking............................................................................................................. 3-8
Figure 4-1: Prior Environmental Clearance Process........................................................................... 4-2
Figure 4-2: Approach for EIA Study ................................................................................................ 4-18
Figure 4-3: Risk Assessment – Conceptual Framework ................................................................... 4-27
Figure 4-4: Comprehensive Risk Assessment - At a Glance ............................................................ 4-29
Figure 4-5: Disaster Management Plan............................................................................................. 4-33
Figure 4-6: Elements of Mitigation................................................................................................... 4-37
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes vi September 2010

Table of Contents
ANNEXURES
Annexure I
Modifications to Equipments Can Also Prevent Pollution – Opportunities
Annexure II
Process Flow Diagrams of Olefins and Aromatics
Annexure III
A Compilation of Legal Instruments
Annexure IV
General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants
Annexure V
Form 1 (Application Form for Obtaining EIA Clearance)
Annexure VI
Critically Polluted Industrial Areas and Clusters / Potential Impact Zones
Annexure VII
Pre-feasibility Report: Points for Possible Coverage
Annexure VIII
Types of Monitoring and Network Design Considerations
Annexure IX
Guidance for Assessment of Baseline Components and Attributes
Annexure X
Sources of Secondary Data
Annexure XI
Impact Prediction Tools
Annexure XII
Composition of EAC
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes vii September 2010

Table of Contents
ACRONYMS
AAQ Ambient Air Quality
API American Petroleum Institute
AVO Audio, Visual and Olfactory Leak Detection
B/C Benefits Cost Ratio
BAT Best Available Technology
BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand
BOQ Bill of Quantities
BOT Build Operate Transfer
CCA Conventional Cost Accounting
CEMS Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
CER Corporate Environmental Reports
CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
CFE Consent for Establishment
CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
CREP Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Protection
CRZ Coastal Regulatory Zone
DfE Design for Environment
DMP Disaster Management Plan
DSG Dilution Steam Generation
EAC Expert Appraisal Committee
ECI Environmental Condition Indicators
EcE Economic-cum-Environmental
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EIS Environmental Information System
EMA Environmental Management Accounting
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EMS Environmental Management System
EPI Environmental Performance Indicators
ES Environmental Statements
FCA Full Cost Assessment
FGR Flue Gas Recirculation
FID Flame Ionization Detector
HAZOP Hazard and Operability Studies
HTL High Tide Level
IL&FS Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes viii September 2010

Table of Contents
IPCL Indian Petrochemical Corporation Limited

ISBL Inside Battery Limits
ISO International Standard Organization
IVI Importance Value Index
LCA Life Cycle Assessment
LDAR Leak Detection and Repair
LTL Low Tide Level
MCA Maximum Credible Accident
MoEF Ministry of Environment & Forests
NAQM National Air Quality Monitoring
NGO Non-Government Organizations
OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OVA Organic Vapour Analyser
PEMS Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems
PID Photo Ionization Detector
PM Particulate Matter
PPA Participatory Poverty Assessment
PTA Purified Terephthalic Acid
PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control
QRA Quantitative Risk Assessment
SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction
SNCR Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment
SEAC State Level Expert Appraisal Committee
SEIAA State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority
SEZ Special Economic Zone
SIA Social Impact Assessment
SPCB State Pollution Control Board
SPM Suspended Particulate Matter
TA Technology Assessment
TCA Total Cost Assessment
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure
TEQM Total Environmental Quality Movement
TGM Technical EIA Guidance Manual
TVP True Vapour Pressure
ToR Terms of Reference
UT Union Territory
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes ix September 2010

Table of Contents
UTEIAA Union Territory Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority

UTPCC Union Territory Pollution Control Committee
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes x September 2010

q{RTdT T&QT ?rer d* (eda varr)
qqr4{ul !q dzT
JAIRAMRAMESH
0lrtd II*FI{
a$ Rd-r r oooa
f{iq MINISTEROF STATE(INDEPENDENT CHARGE)
ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS
GOVERNMENTOF INDIA
NEW DELHI- 110 OO3
22"dDecember 2010
FOREWORD
The Ministry of Environment & Forests (MOEF) introduced the Environmental

Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification 2006 on 14s SePGmber 2006, which not only
reengineered the entire environment clearance (EC) process specified under the EIA
Notification 1994,but also introduced a number of new developmental sectorswhich would
require prior environmental cleararce. The EIA Notification 2006 has notified a list of 39
developmental sectorswhich have been further categorisedas A or B based on their capacity
and likely environmental impacts. Category B proiects have been further categorised as 81
and 82. The EIA Notification 2006has further introduced a system of screening,scoping and
appraisal and for the setting up of Environment Impact AssessmentAuthority (EIAA) at the
Central level and State Level Environment Impact AssessmentAuthorities (SEIAAs) to grant
environmental clearances at the Central and State level respectively. The Ministry of
Environment & Forestsis the Environment Impact AssessmentAuthority at the Central level
and 25 State l-evel Environment Impact AssessmentAuthorities (SEIAAS) have been set up
in the various States/UTs. The EIA Notification 2006 also stipulates the constitution of a
multi-disciplinary Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) at the Centre and State level Expert
Appraisal Committees (SEACs) at State/ UT Level for appraisal of Category A or B Projects
respectively and to recommend grant/rejection of environmental clearance to each
project/activities falling under the various sectorsto the EIAA/SEIAAs respectively.
Although the process of obtaining environmental clearance consisting of Screening,

Scoping and Appraisal and for undertaking public consultation including the process of
conduct of Public Hearing has been elaborated under the EIA Notification 2006, the
Notification itself provides for bringing out guidelines from time to time on the EIA
Notification 2005 and the EC process with a view to bringing clarity on the EC processfor
expediting environmental clearance.This need was further reinforced after the constitution
of SEIAAs and SEACs in various States,who were assigned the task for the first time and
with a need for addressing the concernsof standardization of the quality of appraisal and in
reducing inconsistencies between SEACs/SEIAAs in granting ECs for similar proiects in
different States.
The Technical Guidance Manual of "Petrochemical Complexes" sector describestypes of

EIA, processand pollution control technologies,operational aspectsof EIA with model TOR
of that Sector, technological options with cleaner production and waste minimization
techniques, monitoring of environrnental quality, post clearance monitoring protocol,
related regulations, and procedure of obtaining EC if linked to other clearancesfor e.g., CRZ,
etc.
'Petrochemical Complexes' are involved in manufacturing aromatic hydrocarlons

such as Benzene,Toluene, Xylene, Ethylene Benzene,Napthalene which find application in
manufacture of synthetic fibre, explosives,pesticides,dye and dye intermediates, detergents,
resins, polymethane, etc. Gas & oil cracker units are also covered. Emissions with
mercaptans, hydrocarbons, VOCs, sulphides, phenolic compounds, cyanides, heavy oil,
spent caustic, BOD, COD, SS, and Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, Cadmium etc. have to be
effectively controlled.
Atrnospheric contamination by hazardous chemicals from the petrochemical indushy

can be complex, particularly when substancesor Processescombine. Their combined effects
are often far more toxic and dangerous. Many of these chemicals can produce oxygen
deficient, toxic, or explosive atmospheres. These hazards are multiplied on a refinery site
because of the complex collection of tanks, reactors, vessels, and ducts combined with a
wide variety of hazardous chemicals and emissions, often within enclosed areas. Clean
Technologiesshould be used instead of'end-of- pipe treatmenf technology. Due importance
should be given to recycle/reuse of liquid effluents, solid/hazardous waste management,
risk assessmentand for the preparation of on-site/ off-site emergency plans and disaster
management plal. Knowledge of general confined space procedures and specific in-plant
requirements are critical in refinery work.
India's industrial competitiveness and environmental future depends on Industries

such as Petrochemical Complexes adopting energy and resource efficient technologies.
Recycling and reuse of materials is critical. To keep pace with changing technologies and
needs of sustainable developmen! the manual would require regular updating in the future.
The manual will be available on the MoEF website and we would apPreciate receiving
responsesfrom stakeholdersfor further imProvements.
I congrahrlate the entire team of IL&FS Ecosmart Ltd., experts from the sector who
were involved in the preparation of the Manuals, Chairman and members of the Core and
PeerCommittees of various sectorsand various ResourcePersonswhose inputs were indeed
(Jairam Ramesh)
1.
INTRODUCTION TO THE TECHNICAL EIA
GUIDANCE MANUALS PROJECT
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process of identifying, predicting,

evaluating and mitigating the biophysical, social, and other relevant effects of
development proposals prior to major decisions being taken and commitments made.
These studies integrate the environmental concerns of developmental activities into the
process of decision-making.
EIA has emerged as one of the successful policy innovations of the 20th Century in the
process of ensuring sustained development. Today, EIA is formalized as a regulatory tool
in more than 100 countries for effective integration of environmental concerns in the
economic development process. The EIA process in India was made mandatory and was
also given a legislative status through a Notification issued by the Ministry of
Environment and Forests (MoEF) in January 1994. The Notification, however, covered
only a few selected industrial developmental activities. While there are subsequent
amendments, the Notification issued on September 14, 2006 supersedes all the earlier
Notifications, and has brought out structural changes in the clearance mechanism.
The basic tenets of this EIA Notification could be summarized into the following:
̇ Pollution potential as the basis for prior environmental clearance instead of

investment criteria; and
̇ Decentralization of clearing powers to the State/Union Territory (UT) level
Authorities for certain developmental activities to make the prior environmental
clearance process quicker, transparent and effective.
Devolution of the power to grant clearances at the state level for certain category of the
developmental activities / projects is a step forward to fulfill the basic tenets of the re-
engineering i.e., quicker, transparent and effective process but many issues impede/hinder
its functional efficiency. These issues could be in technical and operational domains as
listed below:
Technical issues
̇ Ensuring level playing ground to avoid arbitrariness in the decision-making process

̇ Classification of projects which do not require public hearing and detailed EIA
(Category B2)
̇ Variations in drawing Terms of Reference (ToR) of EIA studies for a given
developmental activity across the States/UTs
̇ Varying developmental-activity-specific expertise requirement for conducting EIA
studies and their appraisal
̇ Availability of adequate sectoral experts and variations in competency levels
̇ Inadequate data verification, cross checking tools and supporting institutional
framework
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes 1-1 September 2010

Introduction
̇ Meeting time targets without compromising with the quality of assessments/ reviews
̇ Varying knowledge and skill levels of regulators, consultants and experts
̇ Newly added developmental activities for prior environmental clearance, etc.
Operational issues
̇ State level /UT level EIA Authorities (SEIAA/UTEIAA) are formulated for the first
time and many are functioning
̇ Varying roles and responsibilities of involved organizations
̇ Varying supporting institutional strengths across the States/UTs
̇ Varying manpower availability, etc.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of developing the sector-specific technical EIA guidance manuals (TGM) is
to provide clear and concise information on EIA to all the stakeholders i.e., the project
proponent, the consultant, the reviewer, and the public. The TGMs are organized to cover
following:
Chapter 1 (Introduction): This chapter provides a brief introduction on the EIA, basic
tenets of EIA Notification, technical & operational issues in the process of clearance,
purpose of the TGMs, project implementation process and additional information.
Chapter 2 (Conceptual facets of an EIA): Provides an overall understanding to the

conceptual aspects of control of pollution and EIA for the developmental projects. This
basic understanding would set the readers at same level of understanding for proper
interpretations and boundaries for identifying the environmental interactions of the
developmental projects and their significance for taking measures of mitigation. This
chapter covers the discussion on environment in EIA context i.e., sustainable
development, pollution control strategies, preventive environmental management tools,
Objectives of EIA, types and basic principles of EIA, project cycle for petro-chemical
industry, understanding on type of environmental impacts and the criteria for the
significance analysis.
Chapter 3 (About Petrochemical Complexes including Process and Pollution

Control Technologies): The purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader precise
information on all the relevant aspects of the industry, which is essential to realize the
likely interaction of such developmental activities on the receiving environment. Besides,
this Chapter gives a holistic understanding on the sources of pollution and the
opportunities of the source control.
The specific coverage which provides precise information on the industry include (i)
Introduction - Petrochemical capacities, Feedstock processed, Status of technology, Scope
of coverage of chemicals under the petrochemical industry, Production patterns, (ii)
Feedstock Processing - Lower olefins production- steam cracking, Aromatics, (iii) Water
and Wastewater Management - Sources of wastewater generation, Control & treatment
technology, (iv) Air Pollution - Control technologies for air emissions, VOC emissions,
Monitoring & reporting of air emissions, (v) Energy and Fuel Management -
Environmental considerations, (vi) Non-routine conditions - Unplanned events, (vii)
Waste management - Solid/hazardous waste generation from ethylene cracker,
Solid/hazardous waste generation from aromatics plants, Composition of petrochemical

Introduction
industry waste streams, Technology for waste treatment, Waste storage, Recycle and
reuse, Waste pre-treatment- sludge reduction processes, Waste disposal methods and
(viii) Summary of Applicable National Regulations for this developmental activity -
General description of major statutes, General standards for discharge of environmental
pollutants, Industry-specific requirements, Pending and proposed regulatory
requirements.
Chapter 4 (Operational aspects): The purpose of this chapter is to facilitate the

stakeholders to extend clear guidance on coverage of legislative requirements, sequence
of procedures for obtaining the EIA clearance and each step-wise provisions and
considerations.
The coverage of the Chapter include provisions in the EIA Notification regarding the
petro-chemical complexes, siting guidelines, scoping (pre-feasibility report, guidance for
filling form 1, identification of valued environmental components, identification of
impacts, etc.), arriving at terms of reference for EIA studies, impact assessment studies
(EIA team, assessment of baseline quality of environment, impact prediction tools,
significance of impacts), social impact assessment, risk assessment considerations, typical
mitigation measures, designing considerations for environmental management plan,
structure of EIA report for incorporation of study findings, process of public consultation,
project appraisal, decision making process and post-clearance monitoring protocol.
Chapter 5 (Roles and responsibilities of various organizations involved in the

process of prior environmental clearance): The purpose of this Chapter is to brief the
stakeholders on the institutional mechanism and roles & responsibilities of the
stakeholders involved in the process of prior environmental clearance. The Coverage of
the Chapter include (i) roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders, (ii) organization
specific functions, (iii) constitution, composition and decision making process EAC and
(iv) other conditions which may be considered.
For any given industry, each topic listed above could alone be the subject of a lengthy
volume. However, in order to produce a manageable document, this project focuses on
providing summary information for each topic. This format provides the reader with a
synopsis of each issue. Text within each section was researched from many sources, and
was condensed from more detailed sources pertaining to specific topics.
The contents of the document are designed with a view to facilitate addressing of the
relevant technical and operational issues as mentioned in the earlier section. Besides,
facilitates various stakeholders involved in the EIA clearance process i.e,
̇ Project proponents will be fully aware of the procedures, common ToR for EIA
studies, timelines, monitoring needs, etc., in order to plan the projects/studies
appropriately.
̇ Consultants across India will gain similar understanding about a given sector, and
also the procedure for EIA studies, so that the quality of the EIA reports gets
improved and streamlined
̇ Reviewers across the States/UTs will have the same understanding about an industry
sector and would able to draw a benchmark in establishing the significant impacts for
the purpose of prescribing the ToR for EIA studies and also in the process of review
and appraisal.
̇ Public who are concerned about new or expansion projects, can use this manual to a
basic idea about the manufacturing/production details, rejects/wastes from the

Introduction
operations, choice of cleaner/control technologies, regulatory requirements, likely

environmental and social concerns, mitigation measures, etc., in order to seek
clarifications appropriately in the process of public consultation. The procedural
clarity in the document will further strengthen them to understand the stages involved
in clearance and roles and responsibilities of various organizations.
̇ In addition, these manuals would substantially ease the pressure on reviewers at the
scoping stage and would bring in functional efficiency at the central and state levels.
1.2 Project Implementation
The Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF), Government of India took up the task of
developing sector-specific TGMs for all the developmental activities listed in the re-
engineered EIA Notification. The Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ecosmart
Limited (IL&FS Ecosmart), has been entrusted with the task of developing these manuals
for 27 industrial and related sectors. Petro-chemical complex is one of these sectors, for
which this manual is prepared.
The ability to design comprehensive EIA studies for specific industries depends on the
knowledge of several interrelated topics. Therefore, it requires expert inputs from
multiple dimensions i.e., administrative, project management, technical, scientific, social,
economic, risk etc., in order to comprehensively analyze the issues of concern and to
draw logical interpretations. Thus, Ecosmart has designed a well-composed
implementation framework to factor inputs of the experts and stakeholders in the process
of finalization of these manuals.
The process of manual preparation involved collection & collation of the secondary
available information, technical review by sectoral resource persons and critical review &
finalization by a competent Expert Committee composed of core and sectoral peer
members.
The MoEF appreciates the efforts of Ecosmart, Expert Core and Peer Committee,
resource persons and all those who have directly and indirectly contributed to this
Manual. .
1.3 Additional Information
This TGM is brought out by the MoEF to provide clarity to all the stakeholders involved
in the ‘Prior Environmental Clearance’ process. As such, the contents and clarifications
given in this document do not withstand in case of a conflict with the statutory provisions
of the Notifications and Executive Orders issued by the MoEF from time-to-time.
TGMs are not regulatory documents. Instead, these are the tools designed to assist in
successful completion of an EIA. For the purpose of this project, the key elements
considered under TGMs are: conceptual aspects of EIA; developmental activity-specific
information; operational aspects; and roles and responsibilities of involved stakeholders.
This manual is prepared considering the Notification issued on 14th September, 2006 and
latest amendment as on 1st December 2009. For recent updates, if any, may please refer
the website of the MoEF, Government of India i.e., http://moef.nic.in/index.php.

2.
CONCEPTUAL FACETS OF EIA
It is an imperative requirement to understand the basic concepts concerned to the

pollution control and the environmental impact assessment in an overall objective of the
sustainable development. This Chapter highlights the pollution control strategies and
their tools besides the objectives, types & principles of EIA, type of impacts their
significance analysis, in order to provide consistent understanding to the reader before
assessing the development of activity-specific environmental concerns in Chapter 3 and
identification & prediction of significant impacts in order to design mitigation measures
as detailed in Chapter 4.
2.1 Environment in EIA Context
“Environment” in EIA context mainly focuses, but is not limited to physical, chemical,
biological, geological, social, economical, and aesthetic dimensions along with their
complex interactions, which affect individuals, communities and ultimately determines
their forms, character, relationship, and survival. In EIA context, ‘effect’ and ‘impact’
can often be used interchangeably. However, ‘impact’ is considered as a value judgment
of the significance of an effect.
Sustainable development is built on three basic premises i.e., economic growth,

ecological balance and social progress. Economic growth achieved in a way that does not
consider the environmental concerns, will not be sustainable in the long run. Therefore,
sustainable development needs careful integration of environmental, economic, and social
needs in order to achieve both an increased standard of living in short term, and a net gain
or equilibrium among human, natural, and economic resources to support future
generations in the long term.
It is necessary to understand the links between environment and development in order to

make choices for development that will be economically efficient, socially equitable and
responsible, as well as environmentally sound.
Figure 2-1: Inclusive Components of Sustainable Development

Conceptual Facets of EIA
2.2 Pollution Control Strategies
Pollution control strategies can be broadly categorized in to preventive and reactive. The
reactive strategy refers to the steps that may be applied once the wastes are generated or
contamination of the receiving environment takes place. The control technology or a
combination of technologies to minimize the impact due to the process rejects/wastes
varies with quantity and characteristics, desired control efficiency and economics.
Many combinations of techniques could be adopted for treatment of a specific waste or

the contaminated receiving environment, but are often judged based on techno-economic
feasibility. Therefore, the best alternative is to take all possible steps to avoid pollution it
self. This preventive approach refers to a hierarchy that involves i) prevention &
reduction; ii) recycling and re-use; iii) treatment; and iv) disposal, respectively.
Therefore, there is a need to shift the emphasis from the reactive to preventive strategy
i.e., to promote preventive environmental management. Preventive environmental
management tools may be grouped into management based tools, process based tools and
product based tools, which are given below:
Management Based Tools Process Based Tools Product Based Tools

Environmental Management Environmental Technology Assessment Industrial Ecology
System (EMS)
Toxic Use Reduction Extended Producers
Environmental Performance Responsibility
Best Operating Practices
Evaluation
Eco-labeling
Environmentally Best Practice
Environmental Audits
Design for
Best Available Technology (BAT)
Environmental Reporting Environment
and Communication Waste Minimization
Life Cycle
Total Cost Accounting Pollution Prevention Assessment (LCA)
Law and Policy Cleaner Production
Trade and Environment 4-R Concept
Environmental Economics Cleaner Technology
Eco-efficiency
2.3 Tools for Preventive Environmental Management
The tools for preventive environmental management can be broadly classified into
following three groups.
̇ Tools for assessment and analysis - risk assessment, life cycle assessment, total cost
assessment, environmental audit / statement, environmental benchmarking,
environmental indicators
̇ Tools for action - environmental policy, market based economic instruments,
innovative funding mechanism, EMS and ISO certification, total environmental
quality movement, eco-labeling, cleaner production, eco-efficiency, industrial
ecosystem or metabolism, voluntary agreements
̇ Tools for communication - state of environment, corporate environmental reporting
Specific tools under each group are discussed precisely in next sections.

2.3.1 Tools for assessment and analysis
2.3.1.1 Risk assessment
Risk is associated with the frequency of failure and consequence effect. Predicting such
situations and evaluation of risk is essential to take appropriate preventive measures. The
major concern of the assessment is to identify the activities falling in a matrix of high &
low frequencies at which the failures occur and the degree of its impact. The high
frequency, low impact activities can be managed by regular maintenance i.e, Leak
detection and repair (LDAR) programmes. Whereas, the low frequency, high impact
activities are of major concern (accidents) in terms of risk assessment. As the frequency
is low, often the required precautions are not realized or maintained. However, risk
assessment identifies the areas of major concerns which require additional preventive
measures; likely consequence distances considering domino effects, which will give the
possible casualties and ecological loss in case of accidents. These magnitudes demand
the attention for preventive and disaster management plans (DMP). Thus is an essential
tool to ensure safety of operations.
2.3.1.2 Life cycle assessment
A broader approach followed to deal with environmental impacts during manufacturing is

called LCA. This approach recognizes that environmental concerns are associated with
every step of the processing w.r.t. manufacturing of products and also examines
environmental impacts of the product at all stages of project life cycle. LCA includes
product design, development, manufacturing, packaging, distribution, usage and disposal.
LCA is concerned with reducing environmental impacts at all the stages and considering
the total picture rather than just one stage of the production process.
Industries/firms may apply this concept to minimize costs incurred on the environmental
conservation throughout the project life cycle.
2.3.1.3 Total cost assessment
Total Cost Assessment (TCA) is an enhanced financial analysis tool that is used to assess
the profitability of alternative courses of action e.g., raw material substitution to reduce
the costs of managing the wastes generated by process; an energy retrofit to reduce the
costs of energy consumption. This is particularly relevant for pollution prevention
options. These options, because of their nature, often produce financial savings that are
overlooked in conventional financial analysis, either because they are misallocated,
uncertain, hard to quantify, or occur more than three to five years after the initial
investment. TCA includes all the relevant costs and savings associated with an option so
that it can compete for scarce capital resources fairly, on a level playing field. The
assessments are often beneficial w.r.t the following:
̇ Identification of costly resource inefficiencies

̇ Financial analysis of environmental activities/projects such as investment in cleaner
technologies
̇ Prioritization of environmental activities/projects
̇ Evaluation of product mix and product pricing
̇ Benchmarking against the performance of other processes or against the competitors
A comparison of cost assessments is given below:

̇ Conventional cost accounting (CCA): Direct and indirect financial costs+ Recognized
contingent costs
̇ Total Cost Assessment (TCA): A broader range of direct, indirect, contingent and
less quantifiable costs
̇ Full Cost assessment (FCA): TCA + External social costs borne by society
2.3.1.4 Environmental audit/statement
Key objectives of an environmental audit includes compliance verification, problem

identification, environmental impact measurement, environmental performance
measurement, conforming effectiveness of EMS, providing a database for corrective
actions and future actions, developing company’s environmental strategy, communication
and formulating environmental policy.
The MoEF, Government of India issued Notification on ‘Environmental Statements’ (ES)

in April, 1992 and further amended in April 1993 – As per the Notification, the industries
are required to submit environmental statements to the respective State Pollution Control
Board (SPCB). ES is a proactive tool for self-examination of the industry to reduce/
minimize pollution by adopting process modifications, recycling and reusing of the
resources. The regular submission of ES will indicate the systematic improvement in
environmental pollution control being achieved by the industry. In other way, specific
points in ES may be used as environmental performance indicators for relative
comparison, implementation and to promote better practices.
2.3.1.5 Environmental benchmarking
Environmental performance and operational indicators could be used to navigate, manage

and communicate the significant aspects and give enough evidence of good
environmental house keeping. Besides the existing prescribed standards, an insight to
identify the performance indicators and prescribing schedule for systematic improvement
in performance of these indicators will yield better results.
Relative indicators may be identified for different industrial sectors and be integrated in
companies and organizations to monitor and manage the different environmental aspects
of the company, to benchmark and compare two or more companies from the same sector.
These could cover water consumption, wastewater generation, energy consumption,
solid/hazardous waste generation, chemical consumption etc., per tonne of final product.
Once these benchmarks are developed, the industries which are below them may be
guided and enforced to reach them while those which are better than the benchmark may
be encouraged further by giving incentives etc.
2.3.1.6 Environmental indicators
Indicators can be classified in to environmental performance indicators (EPI) and

environmental condition indicators (ECI). The EPIs can be further divided into two
categories i.e., operational performance indicators and management performance
indicators.
The operational performance indicators are related to the process and other operational
activities of the organization. These would typically address the issue of raw material
consumption, energy consumption, water consumption in the organization, the quantities
of wastewater generated, other solid wastes & emissions generated from the organization
etc.

Management performance indicators are related to the management efforts to influence

the environmental performance of the organizational operations.
The environmental condition indicators provide information about the environment.

These indicators provide information about the local, regional, national or global
condition of the environment. This information helps an organization to understand the
environmental impacts of its activities and thus helps in taking decisions to improve the
environmental performance.
Indicators basically used to evaluate environmental performance against the set standards
and thus indicate the direction in which to proceed. Selection of type of indicators for a
firm or project depends upon its relevance, clarity and realistic cost of collection and its
development.
2.3.2 Tools for action
2.3.2.1 Environmental policy
An environmental policy is a statement of an organization’s overall aim and principles of

action w.r.t the environment, including compliance with all relevant regulatory
requirements. It is a key tool in communicating environmental priorities of the
organization to all its employees. To ensure organization’s commitment towards a
formulated environmental policy, it is essential for the top management to be involved in
the process of formulating the policy and setting priorities. Therefore, the first step is to
get the commitment from the higher levels of management. The organization should then
conduct an initial environmental review and draft an environmental policy. This draft
should be discussed and approved by the board of directors. The approved environmental
policy statement should then be communicated internally among all its employees and
must also be made available to the public.
2.3.2.2 Market-based economic instruments
Market based instruments are regulations that encourage behavior through market signals
rather than through explicit directives regarding pollution control levels. These policy
instruments such as tradable permits, pollution charge are often described as harnessing
market forces. Market based instruments can be categorized into the following four
major categories which are discussed below.
̇ Pollution charge: Charge system will assess a fee or tax on the amount of pollution a
firm or source generates. It is worthwhile for the firm to reduce emissions to the
point, where its marginal abatement costs is equal to the tax rate. Thus firms control
pollution to different degrees i.e., High cost controllers – less; Low-cost controllers-
more. The charge system encourages the industries to further reduce the pollutants.
The collected charges can form a fund for restoration of the environment. Another
form of pollution charge is a deposit refund system, where, consumers pay a
surcharge when purchasing a potentially polluting product, and receive a refund on
return of the product after useful life span at appropriate centers. The concept of
extended producers’ responsibility brought in to avoid accumulation of dangerous
products in the environment.
̇ Tradable permits: Under this system, firms that achieve the emission levels below
their allotted level may sell the surplus permits. Similarly, the firms, which are

required to spend more to attain the required degree of treatment/allotted levels, can
purchase permits from others at lower costs and may be benefited.
̇ Market barrier reductions: Three known market barrier reduction types are as
follows:
– Market creation: Measures that facilitate the voluntary exchange of water rights
and thus promote more efficient allocation of scarce water supplies
– Liability concerns: Encourage firms to consider potential environmental damages
of their decisions
– Information programmes: Eco-labeling and energy efficiency product labeling
requirements
̇ Government subsidy reduction: Subsidies are the mirror images of taxes and, in
theory, can provide incentive to address environmental problems. However, it has
been reported that the subsidies encourage economically inefficient and
environmentally unsound practices, and often leads to market distortions due to
differences in the area. However, these are important to sustain the expansion of
production, in the national interests. In such cases, the subsidy may be comparable to
the net social benefit.
2.3.2.3 Innovative funding mechanism
There are many forums under which the fund is made available for the issues which are of
global/regional concern i.e., climate change, basal convention and further fund sources
are being explored for the Persistent Organic Pollutants Convention. Besides the global
funding mechanism, there needs to be localized alternative mechanisms for boosting the
investment in environmental pollution control. For example, in India the Government has
established mechanism to fund the common effluent treatment plants, which are
specifically serving the small and medium scale enterprises i.e., 25% share by the State
Government, matching grants from the Central Government and surety for 25% soft loan.
It means that the industries need to invest only 25% initially, thus encouraging voluntary
compliance.
There are some more options i.e., if the pollution tax/charge is imposed on the residual
pollution being caused by the industries, municipalities etc., fund will automatically be
generated, which in turn, can be utilized for funding the environmental improvement
programmes. The emerging concept of build-operate-transfer (BOT) is an encouraging
development, where there is a possibility to generate revenue by application of advanced
technologies. There are many opportunities which can be explored. However, what is
required is the paradigm shift and focused efforts.
2.3.2.4 EMS and ISO certification
EMS is that part of the overall management system, which includes the organizational
structure, responsibilities, practices, procedures, process and resources for determining
and implementing the forms of overall aims, principles of action w.r.t the environment. It
encompasses the totality of organizational, administrative and policy provisions to be
taken by a firm to control its environmental influences. Common elements of an EMS are
the identification of the environmental impacts and legal obligations, the development of
a plan for management & improvement, the assignment of the responsibilities and
monitoring of the performance.

2.3.2.5 Total environmental quality movement
Quality is regarded as
̇ A product attribute that had to be set at an acceptable level and balanced against the
cost
̇ Something delivered by technical systems engineered by experts rather than the
organization as a whole
̇ Assured primarily through the findings and correction of mistakes at the end of the
production process
One expression of the total environment quality movement (TEQM) is a system of control
called Kaizen. The principles of Kaizen are:
̇ Goal must be continuous improvement of quality instead of acceptable quality

̇ Responsibility of the quality shall be shared by all members of an organization
̇ Efforts should be focused on improving the whole process and design of the products
With some modifications, TEQM approach can be applied in the improvement of
corporate environmental performance in both process and product areas.
2.3.2.6 Eco-labeling
Eco-labeling is the practice of supplying information on the environmental characteristics

of a product or service to the general public. These labeling schemes can be grouped into
three types:
̇ Type I: Multiple criteria base; third party (Govt. or non-commercial private

organizations) programme claims overall environmental preferability.
̇ Type II: Specific attribute of a product; often issued by a company/industrial
association
̇ Type III: Agreed set of indices; provide quantified information; self declaration
Among the above, Type I are more reliable because they are established by a third party
and considers the environmental impacts of a product from cradle to grave. However, the
labeling program will only be effective if linked with complementary program of
consumer education and up on restriction of umbrella claims by the producers.
2.3.2.7 Cleaner production
Cleaner production is one of the tools, which has lot of bearing on environmental
pollution control. It is also seen that the approach is changing with time i.e., dumping-to-
control-to-recycle-to-prevention. Promotion of cleaner production principles involves an
insight into the production processes not only to get desired yield but also to optimize on
raw material consumption i.e., resource conservation and implications of the waste
treatment and disposal.
2.3.2.8 4-R concept
The concept endorses utilization of wastes as a by-product to the extent possible i.e., Re-
cycle, Recover, Reuse, Recharge. Recycling refers to using wastes/by-products in the

process again as a raw material to maximize production. Recovery refers to engineering

means such as solvent extraction, distillation, precipitation etc. to separate the useful
constituents of wastes, so that these recovered materials can be used. Re-use refers to the
utilization of waste from one process as a raw material to other. Recharging is an option
in which the natural systems are used for renovation of waste for further use.
2.3.2.9 Eco-efficiency
The World Business Council on sustainable development (WBCSD) defines eco-

efficiency as “the delivery of competitively priced goods and services that satisfy human
needs and bring quality of life, while progressively reducing ecological impacts and
resource intensity throughout the life cycle, to a level at least in line with earth’s carrying
capacity”. The business implements the eco-efficiency on four levels i.e., optimized
processes, recycling of wastes, eco-innovation and new services. Fussler (1995) defined
six dimensions of eco efficiency, which are given below to understand/examine the
system.
̇ Mass: There is an opportunity to significantly reduce mass burdens (raw materials,

fuels, utilities consumed during the life cycle)
̇ Reduce energy use: The opportunity is to redesign the product or its use to provide
significant energy savings
̇ Reduce environmental toxins: This is concern to the environmental quality and
human health. The opportunity here is to significantly control the dispersion of toxic
elements
̇ Recycle when practical: Designing for recyclibility is important
̇ Working with mother nature: Materials are borrowed and returned to the nature
without negatively affecting the balance of the ecosystem
̇ Make it Last Longer: It relates to useful life and functions of products. Increasing
the functionality of products also increase their eco efficiency
The competitiveness among the companies and long-term survival will continue and the
successful implementation of eco efficiency will contribute to their success. There is a
need to shift towards responsible consumerism equal to the efficiency gains made by
corporations – doing more with less.
2.3.2.10 Industrial ecosystem or metabolism
Eco-industrial development is a new paradigm for achieving excellence in business and

environmental performance. It opens up innovative new avenues for managing business
and conducting economic development by creating linkages among local ‘resources’,
including businesses, non-profit groups, governments, unions, educational institutions,
and communities. They can creatively foster the dynamic and responsible growth.
Antiquated business strategies based on isolated enterprises are no longer responsive
enough to market, environmental and community requirements.
Sustainable eco-industrial development looks systematically at development, business and

environment, attempting to stretch the boundaries of current practice - on one level. It is
as directly practical as making the right connections between the wastes and resources
needed for production and at the other level, it is a whole new way of thinking about
doing business and interacting with communities. At a most basic level, it is each

organization seeking higher performance within it self. However, most eco-industrial

activity is moving to a new level by increasing the inter connections between the
companies.
Strategic partnership, networked manufacturing and performed supplier arrangements are

all the examples of ways used by the businesses to ensure growth, contain costs and to
reach out for new opportunities.
For most businesses, the two essentials for success are the responsive markets and access
to cost-effective, quality resources for production or delivering services. In absence of
these two factors, virtually, every other incentive becomes a minor consideration.
Transportation issues are important at two levels, the ability to get goods to market in an
expeditious way is essential to success in this day of just in time inventories. The use of
least impact transportation with due consideration of speed and cost supports business
success and addresses the concerned in community.
Eco-industrial development works because it consciously mixes a range of targeted

strategies shaped to the contours of the local community. Most importantly, it works
because the communities want nothing less than the best possible in or near their
neighborhoods. For companies, it provides a path towards significantly higher operating
results and positive market presence. For our environment, it provides great hope that the
waste will be transformed into valued product and that the stewardship will be a joint
pledge of both businesses and communities.
2.3.2.11 Voluntary agreements
Voluntary environmental agreements among the industries, government, public

representatives, NGOs and other concerned towards attaining certain future demands of
the environment are reported to be successful. Such agreements may be used as a tool
where Government would like to make the standards stringent in future (phase-wise-
stringent). These may be used when conditions are temporary and require timely
replacement. Also these may be used as supplementary/complimentary in implementation
of the regulation. The agreements may include:
̇ Target objectives (emission limit values/standards)

̇ Performance objectives (operating procedures)
̇ R&D activities – Government and industry may have agreement to establish better
control technologies.
̇ Monitoring & reporting of the agreement conditions by other agents (NGOs, public
participants, civil authority etc.)
In India, the MoEF has organized such programme, popularly known as the corporate
responsibility for environment protection (CREP) considering identified 17 categories of
high pollution potential industrial sectors. Publication in this regard, is available with
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).

2.3.3 Tools for communication
2.3.3.1 State of environment
The Government of India has brought out the state of environment report for entire
country and similar reports available for many of the states. These reports are published
at regular intervals to record trends and to identify the required interventions at various
levels. These reports consider the internationally accepted DPSIR framework for the
presentation of the information. DPSIR refers to
Ü D – Driving forces – causes of concern i.e. industries, transportation etc.

Ü P – Pressures – pollutants emanating from driving forces i.e. emission
Ü S – State – quality of environment i.e. air, water & soil quality
Ü I – Impact – Impact on health, eco-system, materials, biodiversity, economic damage
etc.
Ü R – Responses – action for cleaner production, policies (including standards/
guidelines), targets etc.
Environment reports including the above elements gives a comprehensive picture of

specific target area in order to take appropriate measures for improvement. Such reports
capture the concerns, which could be considered in EIAs.
2.3.3.2 Corporate environmental reporting
Corporate environmental reports (CERs) are only one form of environmental reporting
defined as publicly available, stand alone reports, issued voluntarily by the industries on
their environmental activities. CER is just a means of environmental improvement and
greater accountability, not an end in itself.
Three categories of environmental disclosure are:
̇ Involuntary disclosure: Without its permission and against its will (env. Campaign,
press etc.)
̇ Mandatory disclosure: As required by law
̇ Voluntary disclosure: The disclosure of information on a voluntary basis
2.4 Objectives of EIA
Objectives of EIA include the following:
Ü To ensure environmental considerations are explicitly addressed and incorporated

into the development decision-making process
Ü To anticipate and avoid, minimize or offset the adverse significant biophysical, social
and other relevant effects of development proposals;
Ü To protect the productivity and capacity of natural systems and the ecological
processes which maintain their functions; and
Ü To promote development that is sustainable and optimizes resource use as well as
management opportunities

2.5 Types of EIA
Environmental assessments could be classified into four types i.e. strategic environmental
assessment (SEA), regional EIA, sectoral EIA and project level EIA. These are precisely
discussed below:
Strategic environmental assessment
SEA refers to systematic analysis of the environmental effects of development policies,

plans, programmes and other proposed strategic actions. SEA represents a proactive
approach to integrate environmental considerations into the higher levels of decision-
making – beyond the project level, when major alternatives are still open.
Regional EIA
EIA in the context of regional planning integrates environmental concerns into

development planning for a geographic region, normally at the sub-country level. Such
an approach is referred to as the economic-cum-environmental (EcE) development
planning. This approach facilitates adequate integration of economic development with
management of renewable natural resources within the carrying capacity limitation to
achieve sustainable development. It fulfils the need for macro-level environmental
integration, which the project-oriented EIA is unable to address effectively. Regional
EIA addresses the environmental impacts of regional development plans and thus, the
context for project-level EIA of the subsequent projects, within the region. In addition, if
environmental effects are considered at regional level, then cumulative environmental
effects of all the projects within the region can be accounted.
Sectoral EIA
Instead of project-level-EIA, an EIA should take place in the context of regional and
sectoral level planning. Once sectoral level development plans have the integrated
sectoral environmental concerns addressed, the scope of project-level EIA will be quite
minimal. Sectoral EIA will help in addressing specific environmental problems that may
be encountered in planning and implementing sectoral development projects.
Project level EIA
Project level EIA refers to the developmental activity in isolation and the impacts that it
exerts on the receiving environment. Thus, it may not effectively integrate the cumulative
effects of the development in a region.
From the above discussion, it is clear that EIA shall be integrated at all the levels i.e.
strategic, regional, sectoral and the project level. Whereas, the strategic EIA is a
structural change in the way the things are evaluated for decision-making, the regional
EIA refers to substantial information processing and drawing complex inferences. The
project-level EIA is relatively simple and reaches to meaningful conclusions. Therefore
in India, project-level EIA studies are take place on a large scale and are being
considered. However, in the re-engineered Notification, provisions have been
incorporated for giving a single clearance for the entire industrial estate for e.g., Leather
parks, pharma cities etc., which is a step towards the regional approach.

As we progress and the resource planning concepts emerge in our decision-making

process, the integration of overall regional issues will become part of the impact
assessment studies.
2.6 Basic EIA Principles
By integrating the environmental impacts of the development activities and their

mitigation early in the project planning cycle, the benefits of EIA could be realized in all
stages of a project, from exploration and planning, through construction, operations,
decommissioning, and beyond site closure.
A properly-conducted-EIA also lessens conflicts by promoting community participation,

informing decision makers, and also helps in laying the base for environmentally sound
projects. An EIA should meet at least three core values:
̇ Integrity: The EIA process should be fair, objective, unbiased and balanced
̇ Utility: The EIA process should provide balanced, credible information for decision-
making
̇ Sustainability: The EIA process should result in environmental safeguards
Ideally an EIA process should be:
̇ Purposive - should inform decision makers and result in appropriate levels of

environmental protection and community well-being.
̇ Rigorous - should apply ‘best practicable’ science, employing methodologies and
techniques appropriate to address the problems being investigated.
̇ Practical - should result in providing information and acceptable and implementable
solutions for problems faced by proponents.
̇ Relevant - should provide sufficient, reliable and usable information for development
planning and decision making.
̇ Cost-effective - should impose minimum cost burdens in terms of time and finance on
proponents and participants consistent with meeting accepted requirements and
objectives of EIA.
̇ Efficient - should achieve the objectives of EIA within the limits of available
information, time, resources and methodology.
̇ Focused - should concentrate on significant environmental effects and key issues; i.e.,
the matters that need to be taken into account in making decisions.
̇ Adaptive - should be adjusted to the realities, issues and circumstances of the
proposals under review without compromising the integrity of the process, and be
iterative, incorporating lessons learned throughout the project life cycle.
̇ Participative - should provide appropriate opportunities to inform and involve the
interested and affected publics, and their inputs and concerns should be addressed
explicitly in the documentation and decision making.
̇ Inter-disciplinary - should ensure that appropriate techniques and experts in the
relevant bio-physical and socio-economic disciplines are employed, including use of
traditional knowledge as relevant.
̇ Credible - should be carried out with professionalism, rigor, fairness, objectivity,
impartiality and balance, and be subject to independent checks and verification.

̇ Integrated - should address the interrelationships of social, economic and biophysical

aspects.
̇ Transparent - should have clear, easily understood requirements for EIA content;
ensure public access to information; identify the factors that are to be taken into
account in decision making; and acknowledge limitations and difficulties.
̇ Systematic - should result in full consideration of all relevant information on the
affected environment, of proposed alternatives and their impacts, and of the measures
necessary to monitor and investigate residual effects.
2.7 Project Cycle
The generic project cycle including that of the petro-chemical industry has six main
stages:
1. Project concept
2. Pre-feasibility
3. Feasibility
4. Design and engineering
5. Implementation
6. Monitoring and evaluation
It is important to consider the environmental factors on an equal basis with technical and
economic factors throughout the project planning, assessment and implementation phases.
Environmental considerations should be introduced at the earliest in the project cycle and
must be an integral part of the project pre-feasibility and feasibility stage. If the
environmental considerations are given due respect in site selection process by the project
proponent, the subsequent stages of the environmental clearance process would get
simplified and would also facilitate easy compliance to the mitigation measures
throughout the project life cycle.
A project’s feasibility study should include a detailed assessment of significant impacts

and the EIA include a detailed prediction and quantification of impacts and delineation of
Environmental Management Plan (EMP). Findings of the EIA study should preferably be
incorporated in the project design stage so that the project as well as the site alternatives
is studied and necessary changes, if required, are incorporated in the project design stage.
This practice will also help the management in assessing the negative impacts and in
designing cost-effective remedial measures. In general, EIA enhances the project quality
and improves the project planning process.
2.8 Environmental Impacts
Environmental impacts resulting from proposed actions can be grouped into following
categories:
̇ Beneficial or detrimental
̇ Naturally reversible or irreversible
̇ Repairable via management practices or irreparable
̇ Short term or long term
̇ Temporary or continuous
̇ Occurring during construction phase or operational phase
̇ Local, regional, national or global

̇ Accidental or planned (recognized before hand)
̇ Direct (primary) or Indirect (secondary)
̇ Cumulative or single
The category of impact as stated above, and the significance will facilitate the Expert
Appraisal Committee (EAC) to take a look at the ToR for EIA studies, as well as, in
decision making process about the developmental activity.
Figure 2-2: Types of Impacts

The nature of impacts could fall within three broad classifications i.e., direct, indirect and
cumulative, based on the characteristics of impacts. The assessment of direct, indirect
and cumulative impacts should not be considered in isolation or considered as separate
stages in the EIA. Ideally, the assessment of such impacts should form an integral part of
all stages of the EIA. The TGM does not recommend a single method to assess the types
of impacts, but suggests a practical framework/approach that can be adapted and
combined to suit a particular project and the nature of impacts.
2.8.1 Direct impacts
Direct impacts occur through direct interaction of an activity with an environmental,

social, or economic component. For example, discharges from petro-chemical industry or
effluent from the Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) may pollute nearby water bodies.
2.8.2 Indirect impacts
Indirect impacts on the environment are those which are not a direct result of the project,
often produced away from or as a result of a complex impact pathway. The indirect
impacts are also known as secondary or even tertiary level impacts. For example,
ambient air SO2 rise due to stack emissions may deposit on land as SO4 and cause acidic
soils. Another example of indirect impact, is the decline in water quality due to rise in
temperature of water bodies receiving cooling water discharge from the nearby industry.
This, in turn, may lead to a secondary indirect impact on aquatic flora in that water body
and may further cause reduction in fish population. Reduction in fishing harvests,

affecting the incomes of fishermen is a third level impact. Such impacts are characterized
as socio-economic (third level) impacts. The indirect impacts may also include growth-
inducing impacts and other effects related to induced changes to the pattern of land use or
additional road network, population density or growth rate. In the process, air, water and
other natural systems including the ecosystem may also be affected.
2.8.3 Cumulative impacts
Cumulative impact consists of an impact that is created as a result of the combination of

the project evaluated in the EIA together with other projects in the same vicinity, causing
related impacts. These impacts occur when the incremental impact of the project is
combined with the cumulative effects of other past, present and reasonably foreseeable
future projects. Figure 2-3 depicts the same. Respective EAC may exercise their
discretion on a case-by-case basis for considering the cumulative impacts.
Figure 2-3: Cumulative Impact
2.8.4 Induced impacts
The cumulative impacts can be due to induced actions of projects and activities that may
occur if the action under assessment is implemented such as growth-inducing impacts and
other effects related to induced changes to the pattern of future land use or additional road
network, population density or growth rate (e.g., excess growth may be induced in the
zone of influence around a project area, and in the process causing additional effects on
air, water and other natural ecosystems). Induced actions may not be officially
announced or be part of any official announcement/plan. Increase in workforce and
nearby communities contributes to this effect.
They usually have no direct relationship with the action under assessment, and represent
the growth-inducing potential of an action. New roads leading from those constructed for
a project, increased recreational activities (e.g., hunting, fishing), and construction of new
service facilities are examples of induced actions.
However, the cumulative impacts due to induced development or third level or even
secondary indirect impacts are difficult to be quantified. Because of higher levels of
uncertainties, these impacts cannot normally be assessed over a long time horizon. An
EIA practitioner usually can only guess as to what such induced impacts may be and the
possible extent of their implications on the environmental factors. Respective EAC may
exercise their discretion on a case-by-case basis for considering the induced impacts.

2.9 Significance of Impacts
This TGM establishes the significance of impacts first and proceeds to delineate the
associated mitigation measures. So the significance here reflects the “worst-case
scenario” before mitigation is applied, and therefore provides an understanding of what
may happen if mitigation fails or is not as effective as predicted. For establishing
significance of different impacts, understanding the responses and interaction of the
environmental system is essential. Hence, the impact interactions and pathways are to be
understood and established first. Such an understanding will help in the assessment
process to quantify the impact as accurately as possible. Complex interactions,
particularly in the case of certain indirect or cumulative impacts, may give rise to non-
linear responses, which are often difficult to understand and therefore their significance is
difficult to assess. It is hence understood that indirect or cumulative impacts are more
complex than the direct impacts. Currently the impact assessments are limited to direct
impacts. In case mitigation measures are delineated before determining significance of
the effect, the significance represents the residual effects.
However, the ultimate objective of an EIA is to achieve sustainable development. The

development process shall invariably cause some residual impacts even after
implementing an EMP effectively. Environmentalists today are faced with a vital, not-
easy-to-answer question—“What is the tolerable level of environmental impact within the
sustainable development framework?” As such, it has been recognized that every
ecosystem has a threshold for absorbing deterioration and a certain capacity for self-
regeneration. These thresholds based on concept of carrying capacity are as follows:
̇ Waste emissions from a project should be within the assimilative capacity of the local
environment to absorb without unacceptable degradation of its future waste
absorptive capacity or other important services.
̇ Harvest rates of renewable resource inputs should be within the regenerative capacity
of the natural system that generates them; depletion rates of non-renewable inputs
should be equal to the rate at which renewable substitutes are developed by human
invention and investment.
The aim of this model is to curb over-consumption and unacceptable environmental
degradation. But because of limitation in available scientific basis, this definition
provides only general guidelines for determining the sustainable use of inputs and
outputs. To establish the level of significance for each identified impact, a three-stage
analysis may be referred:
̇ First, an impact is qualified as being either negative or positive.

̇ Second, the nature of impacts such as direct, indirect, or cumulative is determined
using the impact network
̇ Third, a scale is used to determine the severity of the effect; for example, an impact is
of low, medium, or high significance.
It is not sufficient to simply state the significance of the effect. This determination must
be justified, coherent and documented, notably by a determination methodology, which
must be described in the methodology section of the report. There are many recognized
methodologies to determine the significance of effects.

2.9.1 Criteria/methodology to determine the significance of the identified

impacts
The criteria can be determined by answering some questions regarding the factors
affecting the significance. This will help the EIA stake-holders, the practitioner in
particular, to determine the significance of the identified impacts eventually. Typical
examples of such factors include the following:
̇ Exceeding threshold Limit: Significance may increase if a threshold is exceeded.

e.g., particulate matter emissions exceed the permissible threshold.
̇ Effectiveness of mitigation: Significance may increase as the effectiveness of
mitigation measures decreases. e.g., control technologies, which may not assure
consistent compliance to the requirements.
̇ Size of study area: Significance may increase as the zone of effects increases.
̇ Incremental contribution of effects from action under review: Significance may
increase as the relative contribution of an action increases.
̇ Relative contribution of effects of other actions: Significance may decrease as the
significance of nearby larger actions increase.
̇ Relative rarity of species: Significance may increase as species becomes
increasingly rare or threatened.
̇ Significance of local effects: Significance may increase as the significance of local
effects is high.
̇ Magnitude of change relative to natural background variability: Significance
may decrease if effects are within natural assimilative capacity or variability.
̇ Creation of induced actions: Significance may increase as induced activities also
highly significant.
̇ Degree of existing disturbance: Significance may increase if the surrounding
environment is pristine.
For determining significance of impacts, it is important to remember that secondary and
higher order effects can also occur as a result of a primary interaction between a project
activity and the local environment. Wherever a primary effect is identified, the
practitioner should always think if secondary or tertiary effects on other aspects of the
environment could also arise.
The EIA should also consider the effects that could arise from the project due to induced
developments, which take place as a consequence of the project. Ex. Population density
and associated infrastructure and jobs for people attracted to the area by the project. It
also requires consideration of cumulative effects that could arise from a combination of
the effects due to other projects with those of other existing or planned developments in
the surrounding area. So the necessity to formulate a qualitative checklist is suggested to
test significance, in general.

3.
ABOUT PETROCHEMICAL COMPLEXES INCLUDING
PROCESS AND POLLUTION CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES
3.1 Introduction
Petrochemical complexes from the context of EIA Notification are defined as the
complexes that are involved in either cracker and/or reformation unit to get basic
petrochemicals i.e. ethylene; propylene, butadiene and/or benzene, toluene and xylene.
The petrochemical industry in India had its modest beginning in late 1960s when a 20,000
tonnes per annum (TPA) Naphtha cracker was set up by Union Carbide in Mumbai-based
on naphtha. The startup of Indian Petrochemical Corporation Limited (IPCL) complex at
Baroda in the 1980s, commissioning of first gas-based plant IPCL’s Nagothane complex
followed by Gandhar complex, Reliance Industries cracker complex at Hazira, GAIL’s
complex at Auraiya and HPL’s Haldia complex have been significant milestones in the
Indian petrochemical industry. Since then it has made phenomenal growth and is one of
the fastest growing core sectors of the economy. As a result, many petrochemical plants
of different sizes and technologies co-exist at the present time. The petrochemical
industry is highly technological and capital-intensive. Technologies for petrochemical
industries have been developing very fast. Tremendous resources and efforts are being
continuously spent on increasing size and yield of plants through continuous upgrade of
catalyst, reducing energy consumption and cost reduction through novel process rate, new
chemistries or scale up approaches.
Aromatic hydrocarbons - benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethyl benzene, naphthalenes are

important petrochemicals and find application in the manufacture of large number of
intermediates and are the basic building blocks for large number of products – synthetic
fibers, elastomers, explosives, pesticides, dyes, detergent, phenolic resins, epoxy resins,
polyurethane, etc.
This TGM is focused on the process and environmental concerns of the petrochemical
complexes. While efforts have been made to cover all the relevant aspects, suggest the
readers to refer other TGMs also for further details such as TGM on Oil and gas
transportation pipelines, TGM on Isolated storages, TGM on CETPs, TGM on Industrial
Estates, etc.
3.1.1 Petrochemical capacities
At present, there are eight cracker complexes in operation with combined ethylene
capacity of about 2.4 million TPA. In addition, there are four aromatic complexes
namely, Bongaigaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd., IPCL and RIL (two complexes)
in operation with a combined Xylene capacity of about 1.8 million tonnes.
Table 3-1 furnishes the installed capacities and the names of production units for major
petrochemical products.

Petro-chemical Industry
Table 3-1: Major Petrochemical Product Capacities & Production Units
Product Installed Capacity (TPA) Production Unit

Ethylene 2,497,000 ̇ IPCL (RIL) Baroda, MGCC,
Gandhar
̇ RIL Hazira
̇ GAIL, Auraiya
̇ HPL, Haldia
Propylene 15,59,600 ̇ IPCL (RIL) Baroda, MGCC,
Gandhar
̇ RIL Hazira
̇ GAIL, Auraiya
̇ HPL, Haldia
̇ RPL, Jamnagar
̇ MRL
̇ HOC, Cochin
Butadiene 3,32,000 ̇ IPCL (RIL) Baroda
̇ RIL, Hazira
̇ HPL, Haldia
Benzene 8,36,220 ̇ IPCL (RIL) Baroda
̇ RIL, Hazira
̇ HPL, Haldia
̇ BPCL, Mumbai
̇ CRL, Cochin
̇ RPL, Jamnagar
̇ IOC, Koyali
̇ SAIL (Bhilai, Bokaro
Durgapur, Rourkela)
Toluene 1,76,355 ̇ RIL, Hazira
̇ BPCL, Mumbai
̇ CRL, Cochin,
̇ IOC, Koyali
̇ SAIL (Bhilai, Bokaro,
Durgapur, Rourkela)
3.1.2 Feedstock processed
Liquid feedstock from refineries namely; naphtha, kerosene, and cracked LPG have been
traditionally used as feedstock in India. In Indian context, the main choice of feedstock is
limited between C2/C3 and naphtha as LPG is invariably earmarked as domestic fuel and
gas oil being heavier fraction is not preferred due to the complex processing involved for
olefins manufacture. Table 3-2 summarizes the feedstock being utilized at various
cracker complexes in India.
Table 3-2: Feedstock for Major Petrochemical Complexes
Complex Ethylene Capacity Feedstock

(TPA)
IPCL (RIL) Baroda 1,30,000 Naphtha
IPCL- MGCC, Nagothane 4,00,000 Gas (C2/C3) ethane, propane
fraction
IPCL (RIL) GPC, Gandhar 3,00,000 Gas (C2/C3) ethane/ propane

Complex Ethylene Capacity Feedstock

(TPA)
fraction, propane/ butane fraction
RIL, Hazira 7,50,000 Naphtha, natural gas Liquid
HPL, Haldia 4,20,000 Naphtha
GAIL, Auraiya 4,00,000 Gas (C2/C3)
Feedstock used has a direct impact on environmental performance of the petrochemical

processes. As an example of this impact, a comparison has been made between gas and
naphtha cracker operations for specific energy consumption per kilogram (kg) of
ethylene, per kg of total olefins after taking into account the energy requirement for
feedstock. This is summarized in Table 3-3.
The complexity of steam cracking and production of olefins depends on the feedstock.
Olefin plants are complex and costly with both complexity and cost increasing with
heaviness of feedstock. Heavier feedstock produces wider variety of olefins requiring
more complex separation and recovery process.
Gas cracker plants have two additional units - gas sweetening for the removal of CO2 &
H2S; and gas fractionation unit for separation of methane from C2/C3 fraction. However,
the basic steam cracking technology remains same for naphtha, gas oil and natural gas.
Table 3-3: Comparison of Feedstock – Energy consumption
Feedstock Specific Energy Consumption

Kcal/ Kg of Ethylene Kcal/ Kg of olefins
Ethane 3100 3050
Propane 4100 3050
Ethane/Propane (60/40) 3600 3300
Naphtha 5000 3650
Almost 60% of ethylene production in India uses naphtha as feedstock. Naphtha is also
used for production of aromatics. For maximizing olefin production, it is essential to use
high paraffinic naphtha with low aromatic content in cracker. Naphtha production from
imported crude, which has high paraffinic content, is ideal for olefin production.
Regarding the production of aromatics, higher yields are derived from the feedstock,
which consist higher percentages of aromatics precursor content.
The steam cracking section comprises hot and cold sections. The cracking of
hydrocarbons and separation of cracked light gases from heavier fraction pyrolysis
gasoline (pygas) takes place in the hot section while the separation of light cracked gases
ethylene, propylene, butadiene and other fractions takes place in cold section which
operates below 0 0C.
3.1.3 Status of technology
Technology is an important consideration in environmental performance of petrochemical

plants. In India, many plants of different sizes and technologies co-exist at present.

Various technological developments for steam crackers have been incorporated with basic
objective to have:
̇ Lower energy consumption per tonne of ethylene

̇ Improved overall yield of ethylene by shorter residence time, higher severity
̇ Total feedstock flexibility
̇ Higher furnace availability
̇ Increased furnace tube life
̇ Reduced maintenance cost
The older plants have been modernized from time-to-time to keep pace with the
developments, to the extent that existing plants coupled with new plants bring state-of-
the-art technology. Worldwide, the crackers have dramatically increased in capacity over
the past 40 years. New crackers today are being built at giant capacities of 5,00,000 to
6,00,000 TPA, about 20 times the size of early crackers built in 1950s. Broadly, there has
been a doubling in size in the economic capacity levels every decade.
Relatively new gas crackers in India have world size pyrolysis furnaces, highly energy
integrated separator trains and digital control system with provision of advanced control
features. These are comparable to any latest cracker plants in the world, both in size and
technical sophistication. The older crackers had older generation pyrolysis coils with
lower selectivity. IPCL (RIL) Baroda also revamped its facility to increase capacity and
reduce energy consumption.
In aromatic plants, the earlier units were based on technology employing semi-
regenerative processes and monometallic catalyst. Later on, many of these units were
revamped using bimetallic catalyst. The operating reformer unit of RIL is based on the
CCR process.
In general, for most of the petrochemical processes, a succession of catalyst

improvements has resulted in better yield, stability and simplified operation. Engineering
design tools particularly in the area of fractionation, heat integration and reactor design
have become much sophisticated resulting in more efficient and optimized design.
Equipment has improved particularly heat exchangers, instrumentation and high
performance packing for fractionators, resulting in further gains in efficiency and less
expensive plant design. The experience gained in operation and maintenance of aromatic
complexes has resulted in designs that have more process integration, higher heat
recovery, less intermediate storage and higher efficiency.
Modifications to equipment can also prevent pollution – opportunities are given in

Annexure I.

3.1.4 Scope of coverage of chemicals under the petrochemical complexes
Figure 3-1: Coverage of Chemicals under Petrochemical Complexes Industry
3.1.5 Production patterns
Olefins (ethylene, propylene & butadiene) are made by cracking of natural gas, C2/C3
fraction of natural gas and naphtha. Currently, 59% of the country’s ethylene capacity is
based on gas and 40% on naphtha.
Natural gas results in higher yields of ethylene compared to other olefins. On the other
hand, naphtha gives a wider range of output products (including propylene, butadiene
derivatives). Use of alcohol from molasses as feedstock for ethylene manufacture is
rapidly declining.
Aromatics (Benzene, Toluene & Xylene) are produced by number of processes,

predominantly by naphtha reforming, as recovery products from coke oven gas and as
refinery by-products. Refineries account for 47 %, whereas reformer accounts for 42 %

of total Benzene production. There has been a rapid increase in p-xylene production
capacity for production of purified terephthalic acid (PTA) due to enhancement in
production capacities of synthetic fibers.
3.2 Feedstock Processing
This section discusses in brief, the process description, feedstock considerations and
factors affecting environmental performance. For process flow diagrams of olefins and
aromatics, may please refer Annexure II.
3.2.1 Lower olefins production- steam cracking
The most important petrochemical process is aimed to maximize ethylene production (and
associated butadiene and propylene) from the steam cracking of naphtha or ethane. The
world-wide demand for lower olefins (ethylene, propylene, butenes and butadienes) is
higher than any other chemical, but due to their high reactivity they are only found in very
low concentrations in crude oil. It is therefore necessary to ‘crack’ saturated
hydrocarbons into unsaturated hydrocarbons using the large-scale cracking processes.
Ethylene is a very important building block for the organic chemical industry.
Cracking is the process by which saturated hydrocarbons are converted into more sought
after unsaturated species. This is a dehydrogenation reaction. In this process, suitable
hydrocarbons are heated to very high temperatures, in the presence of steam, to split or
‘crack’ the molecules into the desired lower olefin products.
Unlike majority of the chemical industry, only a small number of international technology
contractor’s employ licensed equipment for crackers. These specialist contractors utilize
similar generic designs, but with modifications that optimize the plant performance to
local conditions (especially with respect to integrated energy efficiency). Most
proprietary designs concern the furnace, but there may also be variations in the pressure
and temperature of the fractionation columns; refrigeration systems (open versus closed
loop); and the use of turbo expanders. Regardless of contractor or feedstock, the
processes in the cracker can be broken down into three separate sections: pyrolysis;
primary fractionation / compression; and product fractionation.
3.2.1.1 Feedstock considerations
The ideal feedstock for the production of ethylene by steam cracking are straight-chain
normal paraffins (CnH2n+2), where n is typically in the range 2 to 12. Apart from ethane
(C2) and propane (C3), it is unusual to find pure component feeds. The butanes (C4) are
more often found as a mixture of normal and iso-butane isomers, whilst for C5 and above
the number of isomers increases significantly. Most producers are therefore obliged to
crack mixtures of feedstock that are either gaseous (ethane, propane, and sometimes
butane) or liquid (light, medium, heavy, full range naphtha, natural gas condensates).
Different feedstock produces different ethylene yields and ranges of products. Generally,
as the molecular weight of a feedstock increases, the yield of ethylene decreases and other
products (e.g., propylene, butadiene and benzene) are produced in recoverable quantities
(although the separation and purification of these co-products adds complexity and cost to
the process).

Heavier petroleum fractions are also subject to more side reactions that produce tarry
products and contain coke precursors. Even for a set feedstock, there is some flexibility
within the cracking process to adjust the relative yields of the products by changing the
cracking ‘severity.
While the steam cracking process is broadly similar, each plant has a different economic
optimum configuration for the producer. No feedstock can therefore be described as
optimal for the production of olefins since supply-demand economics drive the relative
cost of the feeds, and the value of co-products. Different types of feedstock necessitate
subtle differences in equipment and operating regime to the cracking Unit Process, and
these are outlined below.
Table 3-4: Feedstock based Differences in Cracking Unit Processes
Feed / Gas Gas Gas Butane / LPG Naphtha Gas Oil

Product Ethane Propane
Ethylene 79-84 42-45 30-40 23-38 23-26
Propylene 1-3 14-18 16-20 13-18 13-14

Butadiene 2 2 2.5-3 4-5 4.5-5
Butane / 1 1 6.5-6.8 4-5 4.5-5.3
Butene
Aromatics 0.4 3.5 3.4 7-14 10-13
Gas feedstock
Lower olefins are often produced from gaseous feeds of ethane or propane, or, to a much
lesser extent, n-butane. The cracking of ethane produces ethylene and only small
quantities of products that are heavier than C3. Ethane gives the best ethylene yield (one
tonne of ethylene is produced from 1.25 tonnes of ethane) and by contrast, 2.17 tonnes of
propane or 2.3 tonnes of butane are required to produce one tonne of ethylene. Field
butane (a mixture of n-butane and iso-butane) can also be used as gas cracker feedstock
and the iso-butane has an excellent propylene yield.
Ethane crackers are frequently operated without a de-butaniser and heavier products are
used as fuel or in gasoline. The equipment for separation of heavy ends depends on the
concentration of propane and/or butane in the cracker feedstock. For gas feed plants, the
pygas yield is generally too low to justify the expense of a first-stage hydro-treater within
the plant to make gasoline-pool product. Plants designed to crack ethane are therefore
generally simpler in design than those designed to crack heavier feeds.
Naphtha feedstock
Naphtha (also known as Light Distillate Fraction or crude gasoline) describes the C6-C10
hydrocarbons that boil in the gasoline boiling range of 50 - 200°C. Naphtha cracking
produces a broad range of co-products (from propylene to fuel oil) and typically 3.17
tonnes of naphtha are needed to produce one tonne of ethylene. ‘Light virgin naphtha’
(independent of crude source) gives a high yield of ethylene at high cracking severity. In
contrast, ‘full-range’ and ‘heavy’ naphthas give higher yields of aromatics, iso-paraffins,
and naphthenes, and lower yields of butadiene and ethylene.

Ethylene (500) (33%)

Propylene (243) (16%)
Hydrogen (0.46)
Naphtha (1500) CBFS (67)

Naphtha
C2 Recycle (13) Cracker FO (291)
(0.5 MMTPA (Ethylene)
Flare Losses (7.5) C9 (62.5)
(viz., Flare + Fugitive
+ Other Process
vents) Benzene (124)
Losses (Flare+Fugitive) +
Toluene (38)
Others @ 1.5% of Rated
Capacity Mixed Xylene (45)
C4’s (Hydrogenated) (81)
Figure 3-2: Naphtha Cracking

A typical naphtha cracking process follows the same general processing sequence as gas,
but requires a higher steam/hydrocarbon weight ratio (about 0.5) to achieve proper
hydrocarbon partial pressure in the cracking furnace.
Since naphtha produces large quantities of pygas and fuel oil, the cooling of cracked gas
requires an additional tower to remove fuel oil constituents before the cracked gas enters
water quench tower. This allows gasoline to be separated from the condensed dilution
steam and hence re-vaporization of the dilution steam is practicable.
The quantity of cracked gasoline product (with 25 - 40 %w/w benzene and 10 - 15 %w/w
toluene) usually justifies a hydrogenation unit to remove di-olefins as feedstock for
aromatic extraction units. Alternatively, pygas may be fractionated to recover C5
molecules for specialist applications, or heat soaked to produce a stable stream that can be
blended into motor gasoline.
3.2.1.2 Process ‘severity’
Several proprietary cracking technologies are available, which focus mostly on the design
of cracking furnaces. Ethylene is usually the most valued product, but there will also be
co-products (propylene, acetylene, a C4 stream, aromatics in the form of pygas and
byproducts (methane-rich gas, hydrogen-rich gas, C5 compounds, pyrolysis oil, C3
compounds, light hydrocarbons). The downstream demand for other products will
influence the design selection.
‘Severity’ is the most significant operating variable in adjusting the yields from
hydrocarbon cracking and is a function of residence time, temperature, partial pressure
and feedstock. High severity (low residence time and high temperature) maximizes the
yield of primary olefins and reduces the secondary reactions that promote coking. The
maximum attainable severity is restricted by the physical limitations of the furnace.
At low and medium severities, primary cracking and dehydrogenation reactions

predominate. They cause a sharp increase in the yield of methane, ethylene, propylene
and C4 hydrocarbons, reduction in C5. However, at very high severity, methane and
ethylene yield levels off while those of propylene and C4 cut reach a peak and then
decline. Ratio of ethylene and propylene yields increases with the severity, which hence
favors the formation of ethylene.

3.2.1.3 Auxiliary chemicals & utilities
A number of auxiliary chemicals and utilities are used to support the steam cracking
process and these may include:
̇ Dilution steam is used to reduce the partial pressure of hydrocarbons in the cracking
furnaces and to reduce coke formation. It may be generated by the vaporization of
primary fractionation spent water
̇ Sodium hydroxide, sometimes in combination with amines, is used to remove acidity
from the compressed process gas
̇ Methanol to dry the cold circuits before start-up, or to dissolve the solid hydrocarbon
hydrates
̇ Antifouling agents in the units for pyrolysis, compression, butadiene extraction,
depropaniser and debutaniser
̇ Antioxidants to stabilize the butadiene
̇ Hydrogen to stabilize the crude gasoline, and hydrogenate the acetylenics in C2, C3,
C4 cuts
̇ Hydrogenation catalysts (generally precious metal on inert support)
̇ Gas drying agents (generally molecular sieves)
̇ A furnace for the regeneration of drying agents
̇ Extraction agent for butadiene recovery
̇ Flare systems provide safe relief in the event of plant upsets and start-up. Fuel gas is
required for the flare pilot flames. Controls are needed to ensure smokeless operation
̇ Nitrogen for permanent or intermittent (maintenance) inerting
̇ Air and air plus steam for the decoking of the cracking furnaces
̇ Plants typically have three large compressors (one each serving the charge gas,
ethylene refrigeration and propylene refrigeration) and these frequently use steam
driven turbines. Steam turbine drivers may also be used for boiler feed water pumps,
circulating oil pumps (naphtha and gas oil feedstock, only), circulating quench water
pumps, and cooling water pumps
̇ Pyrolysis flue gas analyzers and other sampling systems (closed loop or to flare).
3.2.1.4 Factors affecting environmental performance
There are some specific factors that are relevant to understanding resource consumption
and emission data from lower olefin processes.
Plant boundary definition and the degree of integration: A number of operations are
directly associated with olefins production, including feed pretreatment, butadiene
recovery or hydrogenation, gasoline heat soaking or hydro-treatment, benzene
concentration or extraction and tar (residue from heavy gas oil feeds) handling. Fully
integrated olefins plants using naphtha feedstock may include some or all of these
associated processes within the cracker ISBL (inside battery limits), but these operations
may be undertaken in separate facilities that also process streams from other plants.
Feedstock issues: Emission levels can be reported on a ‘per tonne ethylene’ basis.
However, this can introduce problems in comparison to plant performances since the

actual emissions relate not only to ethylene production, but also to the production of other
olefins, and to the feedstock selected. On a per tonne ethylene basis, emissions will tend
to be lower for those plants using gas feedstock than those using naphtha and gas-oil. As a
general rule, the percentage conversion of hydrocarbon to lower olefins reduces as the
molecular weight of feedstock increases. For illustration, approximately 80% of ethane is
converted to ethylene in the cracking process, whereas ethylene yield from naphtha is
typically 30 - 35%. However, virtually no propylene (the next most important olefin) is
produced from ethane cracking, whereas propylene production from naphtha can be as
high as 70% of ethylene. Even when cracking identical feedstock, there is some flexibility
to change the proportion of high value products by adjustment of cracking severity,
according to the specific needs of the producer. Cracking severity and feedstock type can
also affect operations such as furnace run length (length of time between steam/air
decokes) or acetylene converter run length (time between regenerations) which can have a
secondary effect on specific emissions. Industry performance benchmarking often
considers other ratios such as: usage per tonne of ethylene product; usage per tonne
olefins (ethylene plus propylene); and usage per tonne high value chemicals (ethylene,
propylene, recovered hydrogen, butadiene and benzene).
Scale of operation: Unit capacity (measured in tonnes of ethylene production) can have
an impact on specific emissions, particularly to air. The technique used to estimate non-
channelled (fugitive) emissions makes no allowance for throughput or the size of the
source. Since most olefin units have a similar number of unit operations and point
sources, plants with a low capacity and lower ethylene yielding feedstock will tend to
show a disproportionately high specific emission to atmosphere.
Plant age: Older plants tend to suffer technology disadvantages. Furnace conversion,
selectivity, rotating equipment specification and overall energy efficiency are usually
lower when compared to a modern plant. Older plants may have more direct emission
routes for non-routine or emergency situations, e.g. atmospheric (as opposed to closed
system) safety valve discharges. Older units may also have less well-developed energy
recovery systems, compression train efficiency, control systems and high-integrity
equipment to avoid fugitive emissions. Older plants can therefore have higher specific
emissions than modern units. However, nearly all plants undergo some modification
since their initial construction often involving improvements that directly or indirectly
impact the emissions. The major refurbishment of older plants is often restricted by plant
congestion and the close proximity to other plants on established complexes.
3.2.2 Aromatics
The term ‘aromatics’ is used to describe benzene, toluene, mixed xylenes, ortho-xylene,
paraxylene, meta-xylene (commonly known as BTX). BTX aromatics are produced from
two main feedstock: refinery reformates and steam cracker pygas. The processes that
produce feedstock for aromatic plants are not selective and produce a mix of aromatics
that have to be separated and purified. However, the routes to produce aromatics often
have some scope for upgrading of products according to the market need (e.g. benzene
and/or xylene from toluene, p-xylene from mixed xylenes). Aromatic production units
may be physically located in either refinery or petrochemical complexes as there are close
links to both activities.
Main processing schemes in aromatic production are:
̇ Catalytic reforming of naphtha or steam cracking of naphtha for production of

pygas

̇ Solvent extraction for separation of non-aromatics from aromatics

̇ Pre-treatment of pygas, which includes two stage selective hydrogenation.
̇ Separation of benzene, toluene, and C8 fractions
̇ Further separation of C8 hydrocarbons – xylenes and ethyl benzene which includes
separation of ethyl benzene by superfractionation and separation of p-xylene by either
crystallisation or by selective adsorption.
Major units in aromatic complex are:
̇ Catalytic reforming
̇ Benzene-toluene extraction and separation
̇ Xylene fractionation
̇ Isomerization
̇ Para Xylene recovery using adsorption or crystallisation
̇ Trans-alkylation and Disproportionation
There are a large variety of plant configurations for the production of aromatics and these
range from simple systems for the sole production of benzene, to complicated plants
producing the whole range of aromatics. Except in some particular cases, benzene
production units also co-produce toluene and xylene (which may be separated for sale as
pure products or upgraded to benzene). The choice of production process is a strategic
decision that depends on the feedstock availability and cost, and the demand for aromatic
products. The composition of pygas and reformate feedstocks can be influenced to some
extent by adjusting the operating conditions and feedstock quality of the steam crackers
and reformer, but aromatics always remain secondary products of the processes to
produce olefins and gasoline. Pygas and reformate are never supplied as pure cuts but,
once aromatics have been extracted, the remainder of the feedstock (i.e., the C5 cut and
C6-C8 non-aromatic cut ‘Raffinate’) can realize value in the car gasoline pool of refineries
or can be recycled as feedstock to steam cracking plants.
Such are the variations of feedstock and desired products that each aromatic plant has an
almost unique configuration. However, aromatics production from a petrochemical
feedstock will utilize some, or all, of a set of closely connected and integrated unit
processes that allow the separation of aromatics (from non-aromatics), the isolation of
pure products, and the chemical conversion to more beneficial products.
Isolation of pure benzene from its feedstock is complex as it forms azeotropes with many
C6, C7 and C8 alkanes. The azeotropes can be broken using sophisticated physical
separation processes. The most widely applied methods are solvent extraction followed
by distillation. Many different solvents and mixtures are used in commercial liquid-liquid
extraction processes. The liquid-liquid and the extractive distillation processes use
selective solvents, which dissolve aromatics fraction better than the non-aromatics
fraction. Solvent residuals in the raffinate (non-aromatics fraction) have to be separated
and recycled. Separation of the C8 fraction (mainly consisting of o-, m-, p-xylene and
ethylbenzene) is very difficult and may use techniques such as crystallization or
adsorption on solids.
The initial product streams can be converted into more beneficial products by using such
techniques as:
̇ Toluene to benzene by hydrodealkylation (THD or HDA)

̇ Toluene to benzene and xylene by toluene disproportionation (TDP)
̇ Xylene and/or m-xylene to p-xylene by isomerization

Most of the aromatic processes are built and designed by technology providers which are
typically internationally based and have been developed using the current best available
techniques. The process designs do not normally incorporate venting to atmosphere.
Another important aspect of most of these processes is that they are typically designed
and integrated with adjacent operating units and processes.
3.2.2.1 Aromatic plant feedstock and configuration
Many different configurations and integration with adjacent facilities are possible. In
order to simplify this situation, three typical aromatic plant configurations can be
considered:
̇ Integrated olefins complex with BT (Benzene/Toluene) or BTX (Benzene/ Toluene/

Xylene)
̇ Integrated refinery complex with BT (Benzene/Toluene) or BTX (Benzene/ Toluene/
Xylene)
̇ Polyester complex based on p-xylene
An excellent source of BTX-aromatics is the pygas that is produced, in addition to
ethylene, by the high-temperature, short-residence time cracking of paraffin gases and
naphthas in cracker plant. According to the cracking severity, pygas typically contains
20–40 % benzene, 16–20 % toluene, 10-13 % higher aromatics (e.g., ethyl benzene,
styrene, xylenes), with a balance of non-aromatic hydrocarbons (mainly olefins and
diolefins).
Reformate is produced in refineries by the hydrotreatment of naphtha (to remove sulphur

and nitrogen) followed by catalytic reforming (to optimize aromatics generation). The
resulting reformate is separated by distillation into three aromatic cuts (C7, C8 and C9/10)
for use as feedstock in aromatics plant. Various catalytic reformers available are: semi-
regenerative fixed bed reactors, cyclic fixed bed reformers and continuous reformers
The C6-C7 cut is treated by liquid-liquid extraction or extractive distillation to produce

pure benzene and toluene cuts. The raffinate is recycled to the refinery or to a steam
cracking plant. The C8 cut is used as the source of para-xylene. Xylene isomers have
similar boiling points (138 - 144°C) and so it is not possible to separate para-xylene by
distillation. Separation is therefore affected by adsorption (often in a continuous
circulating bed) or crystallization (taking advantage of the different melting points of
para-xylene and the other xylene isomers). Once depleted of para-xylene, the mixed
isomer stream may undergo isomerization to convert the ortho and meta isomers into
additional para-xylene. The C9/C10 cut is mixed with the toluene cut and undergoes a
transalkylation to yield mixed xylenes (for recycle to the para-xylene separation step) and
benzene (for purification in the distillation unit).
This standard process configuration can be modified to meet particular market needs, for
example:
̇ Toluene (and the depleted xylenes cut) can undergo hydro-dealkylation to generate
additional benzene (by subsequent distillation)
̇ Toluene may undergo disproportionation to produce more valuable benzene and
xylenes
̇ Pure o-xylene may be distilled and sold as marketable product

̇ The xylenes cut can be sold or shipped as feedstock for o-m-p xylene production
plants
̇ Pure m-xylene may be extracted and sold as a marketable product.
3.2.2.2 Auxiliary chemicals
A number of auxiliary chemicals are used in the processes of producing aromatics:.
̇ Hydrogen to prepare the feedstock (olefins and di-olefins conversion), to convert

higher aromatics into benzene by HDA, and to convert benzene into cyclohexane
̇ Hydrogenation catalyst (for liquid or gas phase reactions)
̇ Other catalysts (for disproportionation, isomerization)
̇ Adsorbents (for xylene separation)
̇ Clay (for olefins removal)
̇ Solvents (for benzene extraction and para-xylene extraction)
̇ Fuel gas (consumed and produced)
̇ Nitrogen (for inerting, blanketing)
̇ Process water (to improve the benzene extraction solvent performances)
̇ Steam (flare, ejectors)
̇ Process chemicals (e.g., inhibitors, stabilizers)
3.2.2.3 Factors affecting environmental performance
Demand for aromatic products varies and the resulting differences in process
configuration make it difficult to describe the consumption and emission levels from
aromatics plants.
Two significant factors for aromatics plants are the definition of plant boundaries and the
degree of integration with upstream and downstream processes. Plants are usually
described in terms of equipment and process units inside battery limits (ISBL) and
outside battery limits (OSBL). But aromatics plants are complicated because they involve
several different processing steps (each with their own boundaries) that may be located in
different parts of a chemical or refinery complex.
Systems such as wastewater treatment and flares are typically optimized over a complete
chemical complex. Integration with other process units may allow the waste streams to
be recovered more efficiently or utilized by other processes within the chemical or
refinery complex in the most profitable manner. Vent streams, sometimes containing
large concentrations of hydrogen or other valuable components, are typically recovered
and re-used within the adjacent refinery or chemical plant.
Emissions from various processes differ based on the process conditions, equipment and
control systems. The complexity and different products produced in an aromatics
complex affect energy consumption. In addition to the local factors described earlier, the
energy consumption will depend on the aromatics content of the feedstock, the extent of
heat integration and the technology.
The petrochemical industry is a complex and is an integrated industry that includes a

large variety of processes and products. Because of a large number of processes, use of
wide variety of raw materials, catalysts, additives, chemicals, presence of explosives and
hazardous materials, the problem of environmental pollution from petrochemical
industries is also quite complex. A wide variety of pollutants is discharged into water
stream and emitted into the environment. Emissions from petrochemical complex can be

classified into four major categories: emissions from storage and handling units, process
emissions, fugitive emissions, and secondary emissions.
Table 3-5: Pollutants into Water and Air Environment from Various
Processes in Petrochemical Complex Production
Units in Pollutants
Petrochemical Industry
Cracker plant Inorganic sulphides, mercaptans, soluble hydrocarbons,

polymerised product, phenolic compounds, sulphide,
cyanide, heavy oils, coke, spent caustic, SOx, NOx,
hydrocarbons, particulates, water borne waste
containing BOD, COD, Suspended solid, oil.
Aromatic plant Dissolved organics, volatile organic compounds, heavy
metals, hydrocarbons, particulates, H2S, SOx, NOx,
CO, water borne waste containing BOD, COD,
suspended solid, oil & grease, toluene, benzene,
xylenes, HCl, chlorine, cadmium.
3.3 Water and Wastewater Management
The quantity and characteristics of wastewater generated from a petrochemical complex is

strongly dependent on individual process plants operating at the complex. Wastewater
generated from ethylene cracker and aromatic plants are discussed in subsequent
Sections.
3.3.1 Sources of wastewater generation
3.3.1.1 Ethylene crackers
There are three effluent streams that are specific to the steam cracking process, namely:
process water, spent caustic and decoke drum spray water (where installed). In addition,
cooling or boiler water blowdown, surface or maintenance water may also be generated.
The main potential pollutants include: hydrocarbons; dissolved inorganic solids and
particulates; materials that may exert a chemical or biological demand for oxygen; and
trace quantities of metal cations. Major water and air pollutants are inorganic sulphides,
mercaptans, soluble hydrocarbons, polymerised product, phenolic compounds, sulphide,
cyanide, heavy oils, coke, spent caustic, SOx, NOx, hydrocarbons, particulates, water
borne waste containing BOD, COD, suspended solids, and oil. Oily water is the main
source of liquid effluent from cracker plant. Liquid effluents like pygas, pyrolysis fuel oil
quench water, process water stripper bottoms give peculiar odour.
Process Water: In the steam cracking process, hydrocarbons are cracked in the presence
of dilution steam to improve reaction selectivity to the desired olefin products. This
steam is then condensed, and has to be removed from the furnace products before they
can be further processed and separated. Process water refers to the bleed of condensed
dilution steam. The process water may contain phenol and other dissolved or suspended
hydrocarbons. Most of the crackers utilize some form of Dilution Steam Generation
(DSG) to enable up to 90 % of the process water flow to be recovered and recycled to the
furnaces. The emission factor of crackers including a DSG is within 0.03 to 2 cubic
metres per tonne (m3/T) of ethylene, while the range is 0.03 to 7 m3/T ethylene for the
whole population of crackers.

Spent caustic: Acid gases (carbon dioxide, mercaptans, hydrogen sulphide) are scrubbed
from the process stream (cracked gas compression system) using sodium hydroxide
(caustic). Spent caustic is purged from the base of the caustic wash tower. The exact
volume and composition of spent caustic are directly linked to sulphur content in the
feedstock but also depends on the cracking severity and operation of the caustic tower.
Spent caustic contains sulphides, phenols, BOD, COD, oil, etc. The COD before
treatment is typically in the range of 20–50 grams per litre (g/l) and other components are:
̇ Sodium hydroxide (0.5 - 5.0 % wt)

̇ Sodium sulphide (0.5 - 5.0 % wt)
̇ Sodium carbonate (0.5 - 10.0 % wt)
̇ Dissolved hydrocarbons (0.1 - 0.3 % wt) including up to few hundred ppm of benzene
̇ Liquid phase hydrocarbons may be present (including phenols and cresols if naphtha
cracker)
̇ Carbonyls, mercaptans, cyanides and dienes in smaller quantities.
The hydrocarbon contaminants in the spent caustic include carcinogenic benzene and
diolefins, which make it hazardous. Presence of carbonyls and diolefins may cause spent
caustic to be a solution with foul smell. The sulphide content of this aqueous stream is
typically 10 g sulphide/te ethylene. The total salt content is reported as 0.12 to 1.10 kg/te
ethylene where air oxidation is used and 1.3 to 6.0 kg/te ethylene where acidification is
used. Plants using air oxidation for treatment of the spent caustic stream will tend to have
a higher total salt loading than those employing acid neutralization.
Typical dilution steam/hydrocarbon feed ratios are 0.5/0.6 to 1 in the furnace feed for
liquids and 0.3/0.5 for gas crackers. On per tonne of ethylene basis, the range is therefore
between 1 T/T and 4 T/T. With no dilution steam generation, the contribution of process
water stream to the total wastewater flow from the plant is therefore also between 1 and 4
m3/T ethylene. Dilution steam generation systems are typically designed to recycle
around 90 % of the process water (i.e., a 10 % purge rate), which would therefore reduce
the contribution to aqueous effluent from this source to 0.1 to 0.4 m3/t ethylene.
3.3.1.2 Aromatics plants
Water may be used in the process to recover small amounts of solvent remaining in the
raffinate streams, and stripping steam is used in stripping columns to separate heavy
aromatics from the solvent. Process water within aromatics plants is generally operated
in closed-loops. Water input, as either steam or water, is sometimes required to account
for losses to raffinate and product streams.
In aromatics processes there is generally little or no continuous wastewater stream, but

the exact quantity depends on the plant configuration. The main wastewater source is
process water recovered from condensates of the steam jet vacuum pumps and overhead
accumulators of certain distillation towers (due to the water content of the feedstock or
water added to improve extraction efficiency). These streams contain small quantities of
dissolved hydrocarbons and are generally drained to a central treatment facility.
Wastewater containing sulphide and COD may also arise from any caustic scrubbers.
The only other sources are unintentional spillages, purge of cooling water, rainwater,
equipment wash-water, which may contain extraction solvents and aromatics. Water
generated by tank drainage and process upsets may contain aromatics. Wastewater

containing hydrocarbons may be collected separately, settled and steam stripped prior to
biological treatment.
Dissolved organics, VOCs, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, particulates, H2S, SOx, NOx,
CO, water-borne waste containing BOD, COD, suspended solids, oil & grease, toluene,
benzene, xylenes, HCl, chlorine, cadmium.
3.3.1.3 Other specific common wastewater streams
Pump and compressor cooling: Some amount of water-cooling will be used for hot
pump pedestals, glands as well as compressor jackets. Additionally, some water and/or
oil may be use in pump and compressor seals. The drips and drains from these systems
constitute another source of ‘oily drain water’ and will normally have low solids content.
Paved utility area drains: These waters will usually be non-oily and from sources within
the boiler plant, water treating units, air compression units, etc. Thus, these waters will
normally be defined as ‘high solids clean water’. Should the utility area include oil
handling equipment such as fuel oil pumps, then these waters should be defined as ‘high
solids oily drain water’.
Boiler blowdown and water treating rinses: These waters will be non-oily and high in
dissolved solids. Hence, these waters are ‘high solids clean water’.
Cooling water: A process plant may employ once-through cooling water or circulating
cooling water systems (or perhaps both may be used in large plants). If the tubes in the
water-cooled heat exchangers develop leaks, then these waters are liable to contamination
with the process fluids. If the process fluids are volatile enough to vaporize readily
(pentanes or lighter), then the risk of oil contamination in the cooling water is quite
negligible.
If the cooling water is once through, then the cooling water discharge is low in dissolved
solids. However, if the cooling water is circulated in a closed system with a cooling
tower, the blowdown from the system will be high in dissolved solids.
Categories of cooling water are:
̇ Once through cooling water (light ends) – this will be ’clean cooling water’ and will
be non-oily.
̇ Once through cooling water (oil) – this will be ‘oily cooling water’ to acknowledge
the possibility of exchanger tube leaks of non-volatile oil.
̇ Circulating cooling water blowdown (light ends) – this will be ‘high solids clean
cooling water’ and will be non-oily.
̇ Circulating cooling water blowdown (oil) – this will be ‘high solids oily cooling
water’ to acknowledge the possibility of exchanger tube leaks of non-volatile oils.
3.3.2 Control & treatment technology
The control technology is to be based upon the most exemplary combination of in-process
and end-of-process treatment & control technologies. This level of technology is
primarily based upon significant reductions in the COD, as well as the BOD.

End-of-pipe treatment in this case will be biological plus additional activated carbon
treatment. The techniques that can be applied to new plants and to existing facilities will
differ. In existing plants, the choice of control techniques is usually restricted to process-
integrated (in-plant) control measures, in-plant treatment of segregated individual streams
and end-of-pipe treatment. New plants provide better opportunities to improve
environmental performance through the use of alternative technologies to prevent
wastewater generation.
An appropriate control strategy for wastewater from the Petrochemical industry can be
summarized as:
̇ Organic wastewater streams not containing heavy metals or toxic or non-

biodegradable organic compounds are potentially fit for combined biological
wastewater treatment (subject to an evaluation of biodegradability, inhibitory effects,
sludge deterioration effects, volatility and residual pollutant levels in the effluent)
̇ Wastewater streams containing heavy metals or toxic or non-biodegradable organic
compounds (e.g. indicated by high AOX /EOX or high COD/BOD ratios) are
preferably treated or recovered separately. Individual waste streams containing toxic
or inhibitory organic compounds or having low bio-degradability are treated
separately e.g. by (chemical) oxidation, adsorption, filtration, extraction, (steam)
stripping, hydrolysis (to improve biodegradability) or anaerobic pre-treatment.
General prevention techniques
Before considering wastewater treatment techniques, it is first necessary to fully exploit

all the opportunities for preventing, minimizing and reusing wastewater. However, water
use, effluent generation and effluent treatment are all intrinsically linked and should be
considered in combination. A typical exercise in preventing wastewater may include the
following steps:
Step 1: Identify wastewaters - The first step is to identify all wastewater sources from a
process and to characterize their quality, quantity and variability. Pareto analysis is useful
to identify those sources that use most water and contribute most wastewater. Further
clarification is provided by the preparation of plans that show all drain networks, points of
arising, isolation valves, manholes and points of discharge.
Step 2: Minimize water flows - The overall aim is to minimize the use of water in the
process in order to obviate effluent production or, if that is not possible, to produce more
concentrated effluents. It will be necessary to identify minimum quantity of water that is
needed (or produced) by each step of the production process and then to ensure that these
requirements are implemented by such practices as:
̇ Use of water-free techniques for vacuum generation (e.g., use the product as a sealing
liquid in vacuum pumps, use dry pumps)
̇ Employ closed loop cooling water cycles
̇ Use management tools such as water-use targets and more transparent costing of
water
̇ Install water meters within the process to identify areas of high use
Step 3: Minimize contamination - Wastewaters are created by contamination of process
water with raw material, product or wastes; either as part of process operation, or
unintentionally. The following techniques can prevent this contamination:

Process operation:
̇ Use indirect cooling systems to condense or cool steam phases (not direct injection
systems)
̇ Use purer raw materials and auxiliary reagents (i.e., without contaminants)
̇ Use non-toxic or lower toxicity cooling water additives (e.g., chromium based
additives).
From spills:
̇ Fit secondary containment to vessels and pipe-work that pose a high risk of leaks
̇ Provide spill clean-up material (adsorbents, booms, drain plugs, etc.) at strategic
points around the installation and prepare spill contingency plans
̇ Use separate collection systems for process effluent, sewage and rainwater (although
there may be cases where the blending of effluent streams offers treatment
advantages)
Step 4: Maximize wastewater reuse - Even when wastewaters are created they do not
necessarily have to be sent to a treatment plant. To identify options for re-use it is first
necessary to define the lowest water quality that can be used for each activity in the
process.
Wastewater reuse may be achieved by refining and reusing (rather than disposing of)
mother liquors; reusing wastewater in the process (e.g., for raw material make-up) and
reusing wastewater for other purposes (e.g., equipment cleaning).
Abatement techniques
The selection of appropriate treatment technologies requires detailed consideration of

physical and chemical nature of all the wastewaters. The chosen treatment technique may
involve a combination of physical, chemical and biological methods. The following
paragraphs give brief, generic descriptions of typical wastewater streams that originate
from petrochemical processes and the possible treatment techniques.
Acid/alkaline effluents: A suitable neutralizing agent can be added to adjust pH.

Wherever possible, other wastes (and not virgin raw materials) should be used for
neutralization. In some cases the acid dosing of effluents may release toxic gases.
Mixtures of oil/organics and water: The two phases can be separated using such
techniques as tilted plate separators, American Petroleum Institute (API) separators, air
flotation, coalescing agents or hydrocyclones.
Biodegradable organics: Biodegradable material (as measured by BOD) may be

biologically degraded, normally using aerobic microbial activity (but anaerobic activity
has applications as a pre-treatment technique). The treatability of effluent will depend on
the presence of inhibitory materials, the absence of necessary nutrients, the pollutant
concentration and pollutant variability. The steam or air stripping of volatile components
may be required in preparation for biological treatment.
High organic load: Conventional aerobic or anaerobic biological treatment may not be
applicable to effluents with high organic concentrations if they are toxic or difficult to

degrade. It may be necessary to use various forms of extreme oxidation such as

incineration or wet oxidation. All techniques have significant capital and operating costs.
Recalcitrant organics: Recalcitrant organics are organics that are not efficiently
removed by biodegradation but may be removed efficiently by appropriate pre-treatment
or incineration. This refers to single substances and to tributary effluents with BOD:COD
<4. Some long chain aliphatics, aromatics and highly chlorinated compounds are difficult
to biodegrade and may need to be treated by activated carbon adsorption, other adsorption
techniques, hydrolysis, filtration or advanced oxidation techniques. The amenability to
biological treatment can be improved by steam or air stripping to remove the volatile
components. Where the volatiles are chlorinated species the off-gases are passed to an
incinerator.
Suspended solids: Solids may need to be removed as a precursor to further treatment or

as a polishing step prior to discharge. The techniques include settlement, flotation,
precipitation and filtration. The solids produced by these techniques will need to be
dewatered and dried prior to disposal. Removal efficiencies can be improved by the use
of coagulants and flocculants.
Metals: Metals may occur in effluents, for example, through the use of catalysts. Metals
generally need to be removed by separate treatment, because they cannot be removed
efficiently in biological treatment plants. The impact of heavy metals on a biological
treatment facility must be evaluated with regard to inhibitory effects, sludge deterioration
effects and residual pollutant levels in the effluent. Whenever unacceptable effects are
expected, the individual wastewater stream needs separate treatment or central
(combined) special treatment, using such treatment methods as chemical precipitation
(creating a sludge that may allow metal recovery), ion exchange, electrolytic recovery or
reverse osmosis. Metals also make the re-use of biosludge (e.g. in agriculture) more
difficult.
Control and treatment technologies used in petrochemical industries can be divided into
two broad classes:
̇ In plant source control

̇ End of pipe treatment
In-plant source control affords two major benefits:
̇ The overall reduction of pollutant load that must be treated by an end-of-pipe system
̇ The reduction or elimination of a particular pollutant parameter before dilution in the
main wastewater stream
Highly contaminated spent caustic waste generated in the petrochemical industries
requires specific treatment before mixing with the end-of the pipe treatment.
In-plant processes
All in-plant treatment options require segregation of the process waste streams under
consideration. If there are multiple sources of particular pollutant or pollutants, they all
require segregation and also require combining them into few manageable groups for
respective treatment before routing to the end-of-pipe-treatment facility.
In-plant practices are the sole determinant of the amount of wastewater to be treated.
There are two types of in-plant practices that reduce flow to the treatment plant. First,

there are reuse practices involving the use of water from one process in another process.
Second, there are recycle systems that use water more than once for the same purpose.
Some of the In-plant measures are:
̇ Dilution Steam Generator (DSG) and associated facility in cracker units

̇ Elimination of once-through barometric condenser water
̇ Sewer segregation to separate uncontaminated storm water runoff and once through
cooling waters
̇ Elimination of contaminated once-through cooling water, either by replacement of the
once-through cooling system with an air-cooled/ cooling tower recycle system or by
careful monitoring of the once-through cooling system and tightening of the system to
reduce losses of hydrocarbons to the cooling water
̇ Replacement of water-cooled equipment with air-cooled equipment wherever
practical
̇ Use of treated process wastewater as cooling water, scrubber water, and influent to
the water treatment plant
̇ Use of closed cooling water systems on compressors and pumps
̇ Reuse of boiler condensate as boiler feed water
In-plant practices have not been documented for the Indian petrochemical industries.
MINAS development does take into account the in-plant practices prevailing at that time.
However, the environmental statements also do not report these practices. It is
recommended that all these practices also be covered in the environmental statements and
format suggested incorporates these aspects.
End-of-pipe treatment
Effluent treatment facility after having required individual stream-specific treatment, in

general include a scheme comprising:
̇ Primary treatment including equalization, oil removal

̇ Biological treatment
To further improve quality of effluent, processes grouped under tertiary category are to be
used for removal of critical pollutants, in view of receiving environment considerations.
Tertiary processes generally considered for petrochemical wastewater are membrane

separation processes, and activated carbon.
Further, the control technology can be utilized to achieve following objectives:
̇ Reduction in effluent flow

̇ Reduction in concentration of pollutants
Levels of treatment technologies, for petro-chemical industries may include following:
̇ Level I : Primary Treatment

̇ Level II : Secondary Treatment
̇ Level III : Advanced Secondary treatment

̇ Level IV : Tertiary treatment

̇ Level V : Advanced Tertiary Treatment
̇ Level VI : Zero Discharge
Wastewater reduction and reuse
Reduction in water usage sometimes may be more cost effective in reducing the quantity
of wastewater discharged than water reuse or recycle. Good housekeeping is one
inexpensive method of wastewater reduction. Instead of repeating the well-known good
practices followed for wastewater reduction the emphasis in this report is on improving
reporting norms so as to enable benchmarking and provide an impetus to the efforts of
reducing water consumption through spread of best practices.
Many wastewater streams are suitable for reuse within the plant. However, reuse of
wastewater requires investigation on a plant-by-plant basis to determine the technical and
economic feasibility.
Wastewaters emanating from end-of-pipe treatment facilities, particularly those having

tertiary treatment are generally of such quality that reuse can be quite attractive. In
general following are the major reuse options:
̇ Properly treated wastewater can be recycled as make-up to the cooling-tower system.

There are various factors determining the least costly system including
– Cost of fresh water
– Level of contaminants in treated effluents and acceptable level in the cooling
tower
– Cycle of concentration with and without recycle of effluent
– Chemical treatment program required for recycling (particularly for plants which
have already minimized cooling tower blowdown)
̇ Recovery and reuse of condensate streams
̇ Reuse for fire water systems
Spent caustic management
Spent caustic is generated when hydrocarbons are scrubbed in Caustic Wash Tower to
remove acid gases. The acid gas components include CO2, Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), and
mercaptans. The spent caustic effluent generated from petrochemical plants mainly
contains sulfides, carbonates, naphthenates and other similar organic and inorganic
compounds.
Spent caustic has a strong impact on the environment. These compounds are possible
causes of water pollution from standpoint of toxicity, BOD, taste, odor, pH and
appearance. The strength of spent caustic in terms of COD is usually quite high.
Processes available for treatment of spent caustic are:
̇ Stripping after acidification.

̇ Oxidation

– Wet air oxidation, which can be performed in different conditions of temperature

and pressure, generally confined to the S2O32- state and less often reaching the
SO42- state
– Oxidation using Hydrogen Peroxide
– Oxidation using Ozone/Permanganate/Chlorine
̇ Precipitation using Chlorinated Copperas
̇ Incineration
Theoretically, the first process requires re-neutralizing the acid effluent after it has been
stripped and is more expensive in reagents. Meanwhile, the oxidation process is supposed
to allow some recycling of the oxidized spent caustic which is still highly alkaline. In
practice however, the first process requires less investment and also performs partial
phenol removal from the phenolic spent caustic.
The oxidation process using hydrogen peroxide, as such has no drawbacks and is quite
efficient but is high in costs. Oxidation using Chlorinated Copperas has been widely
used but has a serious drawback of sludge formation requiring elaborate handling.
Oxidation using Chlorine/Permanganate/Ozone is not popular due to hazardous emissions

and/or costs involved.
Many petrochemical complexes utilize Wet Air Oxidation.
Ultimate disposal methods
The ultimate mode of disposal depends on several factors i.e., achievable level of the
treated wastewaters, receiving media and its assimilative capacity, compatibility with
equipment usage, etc.
3.4 Air Pollution
Atmospheric emissions from petrochemical processes can be broadly categorized into

channelised (Ducted) and fugitive emissions. Only ducted emissions can be routed to the
control devices for treatment. As far as diffuse and fugitive emissions are concerned, the
objective of control is their prevention and/or minimization (e.g., improved process
equipment with least fugitive emissions; and by capturing them in a ducted system).
̇ Channalised emissions include:

– Process emissions released through a vent pipe by the process equipment and
inherent to running of the plant
– Flue gases from energy-providing units such as process furnaces, steam boilers,
combined heat and power units, gas turbines, gas engines
– Waste gases from emission control equipment, such as incinerators or adsorbers,
likely to contain unabated pollutants or pollutants generated in the abatement
system
– Tail gases from reaction vessels and condensers
– Waste gases from catalyst regeneration
– Waste gases from solvent regeneration

– Waste gases from vents from storage and handling (transfers, loading and
unloading) of products, raw materials and intermediates
– Waste gases from purge vents or pre-heating equipment, which are used only on
start-up or shutdown operations
– Discharges from safety relief devices (e.g. safety vents, safety valves)
– Exhaust from vents from captured diffuse and/or fugitive sources, e.g. diffuse
sources installed within an enclosure or building.
̇ Diffuse emissions, arising from point, linear, surface or volume sources under normal
operating circumstances include:
– Emissions from the process equipment and inherent to running of the plant,
released from a large surface or through openings, etc.
– Non-ducted emissions (e.g. working losses and breathing losses, when not
captured and ducted) from storage equipment and during handling operations
(e.g. filling of drums, trucks or containers)
– Non-routine emissions, resulting from operations other than routine processing of
the facility, including emissions during start-up or shutdown, and during
maintenance
– Emissions from flares
– Secondary emissions, resulting from handling or disposal of waste (e.g., volatile
material from sewers, wastewater handling facilities or cooling water).
̇ Fugitive emissions such as:
– Equipment leaks from pump and compressor seals, valves, flanges, connectors
and other piping items, or other equipment items, such as drain or vent plugs or
seals.
The main air pollutants from petrochemical processes and energy supply are:
̇ Sulphur oxides (SO2, SO3) and other sulphur compounds (H2S, CS2, COS)
̇ Nitrogen oxides (NOx, N2O) and other nitrogen compounds (NH3, HCN)
̇ Halogens and their compounds (Cl2, Br2, HF, HCl, HBr)
̇ Incomplete combustion compounds, such as CO and CxHy
̇ Volatile organic compounds (VOC) which might encompass compounds with
carcinogenic potential
̇ Particulate matter (such as dust, soot, alkali, heavy metals) with possible carcinogenic
properties.
The main category of air pollutants from the production of Petrochemicals are
combustion emissions, VOCs and acid gases.
Raw material supply and work-up
̇ Vents on distillation columns and stripping columns for removal of impurities in raw
materials
̇ Vents on pre-mixing vessels (VOCs, particulates)

Synthesis
̇ Discrete vents serving reaction equipment (e.g., purges, inert vents from condensers,
letdown vessels, process scrubbers)
̇ Vents associated with catalyst preparation and catalyst regeneration (containing
VOCs, NOx, SOx)
̇ Relief devices to maintain safe operation (e.g., pressure relief valves, bursting discs).
Product separation and refinement
̇ Vents serving separation equipment (e.g., distillation columns, stripping columns,

crystallisers, condensers)
̇ Particulate from drying and handling of solids
̇ VOCs from the regeneration of purification beds
̇ Solvent regeneration.
Product storage and handling
̇ Tank losses from displacement during filling and breathing during ambient
temperature changes (mainly VOCs with rate of loss depending on vapour pressure)
̇ Loading/unloading of containers and vessels (tankers for road, rail and boat)
̇ Blanket gases used in storage tanks
̇ Evaporative losses from spills.
Emission abatement
̇ Waste gas combustion units (e.g., flares, incinerators)

̇ Stripping of wastewater (with air or steam) will transfer dissolved organics into the
gaseous phase
̇ VOCs from wastewater collection systems (e.g., drains, balancing tanks)
̇ VOCs from wastewater treatment facilities
̇ VOCs and particulates from storage and treatment of solid wastes.
Energy / utilities
̇ Combustion units are widely used for raising steam, heat and electricity (e.g., process
heaters, furnaces).
Atmospheric Emissions from Specific Processes are discussed in subsequent sub-sections.
3.4.1 Ethylene cracker
Steam cracking is the heart of petrochemical operations. The sources of atmospheric

emission in ethylene cracking process are:
Furnace area (steady state operation): The furnace area is defined as that part of the
process comprising pyrolysis heaters, complete with heat exchange equipment for
generating high pressure steam, and any separately fired steam superheaters. It excludes

auxiliary boilers and regeneration furnaces. In volume and pollutant terms, the most
significant emissions to air result from the combustion of fuels in the pyrolysis cracking
furnaces. The operating conditions of cracking furnaces are frequently changed in order
to provide the desired product distribution and this may affect optimal control of the
combustion process.
Furnace area (decoke operations): All cracking furnaces require periodic de-coking to
remove carbon build-up on the radiant coils. The carbon layer acts as an insulator, and
requires the use of higher tube metal temperatures to maintain desired feedstock
conversion. At a pre-determined level, dictated by the coil metallurgy, the furnace must
be de-coked to restore its performance and carbon is burned to carbon dioxide. Number
of cycles varies significantly with different feedstock, coil configurations and the
operating severity, but it is typically in the range 14-100 days. It should be noted,
however, that the extent of coke build-up is time dependent, so those furnaces requiring
frequent de-cokes will generally have a much lower coke build-up than those with
extended cycles. De-coking emissions are not monitored by dedicated equipment (e.g.,
online analysers) since furnace de-coking is an infrequent operational mode (typically
only 3 % of the time). During the de-coking phase, process control is important to
minimize particulate emissions and there is typically visual inspection of the emission
point and close supervision of process parameters (e.g., temperatures).
Flaring: All crackers are provided with flare gas systems to allow safe disposal of any
hydrocarbons or hydrogen that cannot be recovered in the process. This is particularly the
case during unplanned shutdowns, and during start-ups, when the intermediate streams
have not reached the compositions required to enable the production of full-specification
products.
VOCs from point sources: During normal operation there are very few VOC emissions
from the cracking process because they are recycled into process, used as a fuel or routed
to associated processes on an integrated site. Elevated VOC emissions from ethylene
plants are intermittent, but occur during plant start-up and shutdown, process upsets and
emergencies. VOCs may be emitted from pressure relief devices, intentional venting of
off-specification materials or depressurizing and purging of equipment for maintenance.
In general, intermittent emissions, all pressure relief devices, and emergency vents are
routed to flare. The relief valve from demethaniser usually vents to atmosphere, but the
valve is not operated very frequently and results in emissions of hydrogen and methane.
Fugitive emissions: Steam crackers are large complex units that have a high number of
components with potential to give rise to fugitive emissions. Fugitive emissions may
arise from valve glands, pipeline flanges, open-ended (non-blanked) lines, pressure relief
valves and other piping components, in addition to the pump/compressor seals and
sample points. Many of the process streams are light (containing at least 20 % of
substances with vapour pressure greater than 300 Pa at 20 ºC) and at high pressure (1500
- 3000 kPa). Fugitive losses can therefore constitute a significant proportion of overall
steam cracking process emissions and there are examples reported in literature of fugitive
emissions accounting for two-thirds of total VOC emissions.
Hence, hydrocarbons from steam cracking unit are mostly emitted due to leakage and
flaring of the residual gases. VOC emissions from steam cracking are composed of
paraffins, ethylene, olefins (including propylene) and other hydrocarbons.

3.4.2 Aromatics plants
The major sources of atmospheric emissions from aromatics plants are:
Catalyst Regenerator vents: Depending on the feedstock availability some of the

aromatic plants may be based on Reformer units within the complex. The reformer may
be semi-regenerative or continuous regeneration type. In the regeneration process of
catalyst in the continuous reforming unit, a slip stream of catalyst is withdrawn, the coke
is burned off, with hot air/steam, trace quantities of a promoter, normally an organic form
of chlorine (such as tri or perchloroethylene) are added to retain catalyst activity, moisture
is removed and the regenerated catalyst is returned back to the reformer. In the cyclic or
semi regenerative units, regeneration of catalyst and consequent emissions are
discontinuous. The off gas from regenerator contains, steam, air, hydrocarbons, CO2,
HCl, H2S a small quantity of catalyst fines, traces of Cl2, CO, SO2 and dioxins and furans.
Hydrogenation reactions: The continuous vents from hydrogenations (pygas

hydrostabilisation, cyclohexane reaction) may contain hydrogen sulphide (from the
feedstock desulphurisation), methane and hydrogen. The off-gas is normally discharged
to a fuel gas network to recover calorific value. If necessary, for example, under
emergency conditions, the off-gas may be flared giving emissions of CO, NOx, VOC and
particulates, depending on the gas composition, as well as the flare type, size and load.
Dealkylation reactions: The dealkylation off-gases can be separated in a hydrogen

purification unit to produce hydrogen (for recycle) and methane (for use as a fuel gas).
Combustion emissions: The heating furnaces will give rise to combustion gases. Fired
heaters which are used in industries producing petrochemical complexes may be major
source of sulphur emission as they use fuel oil. Fuel oil desulphurisation, flue gas
desulphurisation and use of low sulphur fuel may be some of the methods/options to
reduce sulphur emissions from these industries.
VOCs: There are usually no continuous VOC emission sources on aromatics plants,
although some plants may use vacuum systems that have a continuous air emission. Most
VOC emissions are normally from fugitives (e.g., valve, flange and pump seal leaks) and
from non-routine operations (maintenance, inspection). Also due to lower operating
temperatures and pressures, the fugitive emissions from some aromatics processes are
considerably less when compared to other petrochemical processes where higher
temperatures and pressures are employed. The quantification of fugitives is dependent on
the calculation method, but some documents consider that a release of 50 t/ year of
hydrocarbons (including benzene) is a plausible order of magnitude for non-routine
emissions from a typical aromatics installation.
VOCs may also arise from storage tank breathing losses and displacement of tanks for
raw materials, intermediate products and final products. The VOCs may be aromatics
(benzene, toluene), saturated aliphatics (C1–C4) or other aliphatics (C2–C10).
3.4.3 Control technologies for air emissions
The treatment of air emissions normally takes place on-site and usually at the point of
generation. Waste gas treatment units are specifically designed for a certain waste gas
composition and may not provide treatment for all pollutants. The petrochemical industry
has increasingly reduced the emissions from point sources, and this makes losses from
fugitive sources relatively more important.

Petrochemical processes usually operate with closed process equipment because of

reactant/product characteristics (e.g., high volatility, high toxicity, high hazard risk), and
reaction conditions (e.g., high temperatures and pressures) and this has associated
environmental benefits.
Special fields of attention with regard to air emission prevention are:
̇ Raw materials and fuel composition;

̇ Required volume of process air;
̇ Presence of, and need for, inert gases in the process (e.g., N2 from ambient air);
̇ Energy consumption and the combustion conditions.
As mentioned, the major concern in atmospheric emissions from petrochemical
complexes is emissions of VOCs. Release of toxic/hazardous components and their
impact on plant surroundings needs special attention. The petrochemical industry is
characterized by toxic / hazardous chemicals that are handled and processed in large
volumes and so external safety is an important issue.
3.4.3.1 VOCs
Generally the control on hydrocarbon emissions has been attempted by employing

equipment design standards, control technologies and inspection/maintenance
requirements.
Improved technology has a great potential in fugitive emission control. In recent years,
manufacturers of seals, packing, and gaskets for process equipment have designed their
products to control fugitive vapor leaks. These more effective seals, packing, etc., are
expected to result in lower emissions and lower costs for monitoring and maintenance
programs. Hydrocarbon emissions can pose not only environmental risk but also safety
risks. Indian petrochemical industries have been following inspection routine to ensure
that any leaks do not lead to incidents. In such inspections sensory perceptions of the
operators and LEL detectors play a vital role. This same program when extended with
the use of monitoring instruments and appropriate frequency will lead to control of
environmental risks and has been commonly called as Leak detection & Repair (LDAR).
The effectiveness and costs of VOC prevention and control depend on VOC species,
VOC concentration, the flow rate, and the source. Resources are typically targeted at
high flow, high concentration, process vents, but recognition should be given to the
cumulative impact of low concentration diffuse generation sources. Following table
identifies the properties needed to select the appropriate control technique for each
identified stream generated by a process source.
Table 3-6: Selection of Appropriate Control Technique
Emission Stream Property Toxic Gas Property

̇ Toxic gas content ̇ Molecular Weight
̇ Organic content ̇ Vapor Pressure
̇ Heat content ̇ Solubility
̇ Oxygen content ̇ Adsorption properties
̇ Moisture content
̇ Halogen/metal content
̇ Flow rate

Emission Stream Property Toxic Gas Property

̇ Temperature
̇ Pressure
The following sections describe some of the prevention and control techniques that are
applicable to these sources.
3.4.3.2 Process vents
Process vents usually represent the largest source of VOCs generation from petrochemical
processes. Wherever possible, VOCs should be reused within the process. The potential
for recovery depends on:
̇ Composition: In technical and economic terms, a gas stream containing one VOC (or
a simple mixture) will be more amenable to re-use than one containing a complex
mix. Likewise, high concentration streams (with low levels of inerts) are more
amenable to reuse.
̇ Restrictions on reuse: The quality of recovered VOCs should be of a suitable quality
for re-use within the process, and should not generate new environmental issues.
̇ VOC value: VOCs that are derived from expensive raw materials will be able to
sustain higher recovery costs.
The next best alternative is to recover the calorific content of carbon by using VOCs as a
fuel. If this is not possible, then there may be a requirement for abatement. The choice of
abatement technique is dependent on factors that include VOC composition
(concentration, type and variability) and targeted emission levels. For example:
̇ Pre treatment to remove moisture and particulates, followed by

̇ Concentration of a dilute gas stream, followed by
̇ Primary removal to reduce high concentrations, followed by
̇ Polishing to achieve the desired release levels.
The most frequent approach to point source control is the application of add-on control
device. These devices can be of two types: combustion and recovery. Applicable
combustion devices are thermal incinerators, catalytic incinerators, flares and
boilers/process heaters. Applicable recovery devices include condenser, absorbers, and
adsorbers. The combustion devices are more commonly applied control devices, since
they are capable of high removal efficiencies for almost any type of toxic gases. Selection
of applicable control technique is made on the basis of stream specific characteristics and
desired control efficiency.
The choice of the best technique will depend on site-specific circumstances.
3.4.3.3 Storage, Handling and Transfer
At a generic level for petrochemical processes, storage tank releases may result from air
displacement during ambient temperature changes, during tank filling and from the use of
inert gas blankets.

Minimization techniques are particularly applicable to environmentally hazardous

substances, odorous substances and any substances with a true vapour pressure (TVP) in
excess of 14 kPa. Losses from tanks can be minimized by the use of such techniques as:
̇ External floating roof, which can effect a 70 - 90% reduction in losses

̇ Secondary seals can further improve reductions to 95%
̇ Fixed roof tanks with internal floating covers and rim seals, which are used for more
volatile liquids and can achieve 70 - 85% reduction
̇ Fixed roof tanks with inert gas blanket
̇ Storage under pressure provides a higher level of containment (e.g., for highly
odorous amines)
̇ Inter-connecting storage vessels and mobile containers with balance lines, reducing
losses by 75%.
The loading and unloading of transport containers (rail or road tankers or boats), and
transfer of material between vessels pose a risk of losses to air, ground and water. The
techniques available to reduce these risks include:
̇ Tank filling pipes that extend beneath the liquid surface

̇ Bottom loading to avoid splashing
̇ Vapour balance lines that transfer the displaced vapour from the container being filled
to the one being emptied
̇ An enclosed system with extraction to suitable arrestment plant.
Displaced gases that necessarily occur from storage and handling are preferably recovered
by condensation, absorption or adsorption before consideration is given to destruction by
combustion (in a flare, incinerator, or energy raising unit). Flame arresters (or other
detonation safeguards) will be required in the case of abatement by combustion.
3.4.3.4 Fugitives
Fugitive emissions to the air environment are caused by vapour leaks from pipe systems
and from closed equipment as a result of gradual loss of the intended tightness. Although
the loss rates per individual piece of equipment are usually small, there are so many
pieces of equipment in a typical petrochemical plant that the total loss of VOCs via
fugitive routes may be very significant. LDAR programmes are therefore important to
identify leak sources and to minimise losses. Fugitive emissions can be controlled by
elaborate leak detection, repair and equipment modifications. Many plants have
implemented LDAR programmes in which various sources of fugitive emission like leaks
from valves, flanges, pump seals, etc., are routinely monitored for leaks and maintained
on regular basis.
Sources of fugitives and reduction techniques
There are many potential sources of fugitive emissions in petrochemical plants but they
can be classified into a few common categories, typically; stem packing on valves and
control valves, flanges / connections, open ends, safety valves, pump and compressor
seals, equipment manholes and sampling points.

Valves: Stem leaks can be caused by such factors as: the use of low quality packing
material, inaccurate machining of the stem / packing housing, improper valve assembly,
ageing of the packing, inadequate packing compression, and corrosion / abrasion of the
packing by dirt. High quality valves have very low fugitive emissions as a result of
improved packing systems that are built to stringent tolerances and carefully assembled.
In some instances, departing from raising stem valves and using another type of valve can
be justified. Good quality quarter turn valves often have lower emissions than raising
stem valves and, along with sleeved plug valves, have two independent seals but other
considerations may limit their use. Bellows valves have no stem emission at all, but the
resulting emission reduction (compared with good quality raising stem valves) may not be
sufficient to justify the additional costs. Bellows valves are mainly used for health or
safety reasons in highly toxic services (to reduce operator exposure to toxic vapours) or
highly corrosive service (to avoid corrosion of the valve components that could lead to a
loss of containment). As a rough guide, bellow valves up to 50 mm will cost four times
as much as the same size conventional valve. Valves between 50 and 200 mm will cost
three times as much, and valves above 200 mm twice as much as a conventional valve.
Control valves: Because they are frequently opened and closed, control valves are more
prone to leakage than shut-off valves. It is not uncommon to find more than 20 % of
control valves leaking above 1000 ppm, even in well-maintained plants that have a
stringent fugitive emission reduction programme. Using rotating control valves instead of
raising stem control valves can help reduce fugitive emissions. Another possibility is to
consider process control using variable speed drivers on pumps rather than control valves.
Flanges: On a typical plant, the percentage of leaking flanges is relatively low but due to
large number of flanges they can contribute significantly to total fugitive emissions.
Piping systems in cyclic thermal service are likely to have higher leak rates. Leaks from
flanges are often caused by misalignment and can be reduced by increased attention to the
bolting technique. The flange rating and gasket material must be adequate for the service.
Minimising the number of flanges (by replacement with welded connections) can be
considered, compatible with the operations and maintenance requirements of the plant.
Open ends: ‘Open ends’ are the vents and drain outlets from pipes, equipment or
sampling points. The open ends are fitted with a (normally closed) valve but are prone to
very high leak rates if poorly maintained. All vents and drains that are not operated on a
regular basis should be blinded, capped or plugged. Those that need to be operated
regularly should be fitted with two block valves. Sampling points can be fitted with a
ram-type sampling valve or with a needle valve and a block valve to minimize emissions.
Losses from sampling systems and analyzers can also be reduced by optimizing the
sampling volume/frequency, minimizing the length of sampling lines, fitting enclosures,
venting to flare systems and closed loop flush (on liquid sampling points).
Safety valves: Leaks through safety valves discharging to air can be significant. Losses
can be reduced by the installation of a rupture disk upstream of the safety valve.
Alternatively, safety relief devices and equipment blow-down connections can be
connected to a flare or to another vapour abatement system, although this option may be
prevented by safety considerations. Balanced bellows-type relief valves are also used to
minimise the valve leakage outside of design lift range.
Pumps: Although pump seals can have high leak rates, their contribution to total fugitive
emissions is relatively small owing to the limited number of pumps installed in a plant.
Fugitive emissions can be minimised by the use of high quality and double seal systems.
Centrifugal pumps use a double mechanical seal with a seal barrier fluid although this

system is quite expensive. In many cases, simpler high performance seal systems can
achieve the desired performance regarding fugitive emission. Whenever applicable, seal-
less pumps (either magnetically driven or canned) eliminate the fugitive emission
completely. Seal-less pumps are not available for all duties and not suitable in services
containing particles, particularly iron (which may come from corrosion).
Compressors: Issues with compressors are similar to pumps. However, leak rates from
large compressors can be very significant, particularly for positive displacement
machines. In addition to the solutions available for pumps, it may also be possible to
collect the seal losses and route these to a lower pressure system, if it exists, or to flare.
General factors that apply to all equipment are:
̇ Minimizing the number of valves, control valves and flanges will reduce potential
leak sources, but this must be consistent with plant safe operability and maintenance
needs
̇ Improving the access to potential leaking components will enable effective future
maintenance.
In many cases, using better quality equipment can result in significant reductions in
fugitive emissions. On new plants, this does not generally increase the investment cost
but, on existing plants, replacing existing equipment with equipment of improved quality
may be a significant cost. On both new and existing plants, the control of fugitive
emissions also relies on LDAR programmes.
A. Leak detection
The first step in reducing fugitive emissions is to detect which numerous potential leak
points on a plant are leaking. The usual detection method is ‘sniffing’ using a hand-held
organic vapour analyser (OVA) to measure the vapour concentration at the interface of
the potential leak. The best ‘sniffing’ method is generally regarded to be Method 21 as
developed by the USEPA. The OVA is either a FID (flame ionisation detector) or a PID
(photo ionization detector), depending on the nature of the vapours. PID techniques can
be used in plant areas that have an explosion risk but they are insensitive to many
substances. FID techniques are therefore more widely used. The measured concentration
(in ppm) is called the screening value and becomes a ‘leak’ when it exceeds a defined
level. The concentration measurements collected by sniffing are not very accurate
because measurement and interpretation are influenced by factors, such as:
̇ OVA type and manufacturer - the measured concentration is influenced by the

pumping rate and by the size and shape of the probe tip.
̇ Operator skill - the speed at which the probe tip is moved and the distance to the leak
point interface, have an influence. Good practice is described in USEPA Method 21.
̇ Weather conditions during measurements - measurements undertaken in high winds
are useless. The intensity of precipitation and the ambient may also play a role.
̇ Background concentration - an average background concentration can be measured
and deducted from measurements but this does not take account of the background
variability.
̇ Nature of the emitted vapour - the response factor of instrument to the substances
being emitted must be taken into account. However, the exact composition of the
vapours is often not precisely defined for every potential leak point.

̇ OVA calibration – the detector must be re-calibrated on a regular basis to avoid drift.
̇ Pressure in the system - appendages at elevated pressure have a higher tendency for
leaking than appendages in service at atmospheric pressure, but the use of better
construction standards reduces this tendency.
̇ Substances present in the equipment - information on the substances is important for
classification purposes (gaseous, low boiling, high boiling) so that the emission load
can be calculated (e.g., using the EPA correlation method).
Some leak sources that have a very low risk of causing fugitive emissions are not covered
by leak detection programme. For example, sniffing is not an appropriate method for leak
detection from systems that only contain heavy liquids with a vapour pressure below 0.3
kPa at 20°C. These leaks can anyway be detected visually and the losses do not
contribute significantly to overall fugitive emissions.
B. Leak repair
Leak detection is carried out so that repairs can be affected and fugitive emissions
reduced. If the repairs are not completed or are ineffective, then no emission reduction is
achieved. Repairs should therefore be carried out as soon as possible after leak detection
and a staged repair approach is often applied to reduce the costs:
̇ Immediate, minor repairs can be performed while the equipment is still operating by,
for example, tightening bolts to eliminate leaks from valve stems or flanges, or
installing / tightening caps on open ends. This is often effective for open ends and
flanges but not always so for valve stem packing as over-tightening may prevent
valve operation or may completely destroy the packing thus causing a larger leak. In
any case, bolt tightening on equipment under pressure needs to be executed carefully
by skilled operators and may not always be appropriate due to safety reasons (e.g.,
high pressure).
̇ Leaks that cannot be stopped by immediate minor repair are considered for more
intensive repair. As this can involve changing a gasket or valve packing it typically
requires the equipment to be taken out of service. Repairs to equipment that is
continuously in service are usually delayed until the next plant shut-down or
turnaround.
̇ When no effective repair can be performed, replacement of the equipment needs to be
considered.
The threshold leak rate at which repairs are performed depends on the plant situation and
the type of repair required. Minor repairs are low cost interventions and can be
performed on all leaks above a low threshold. Setting the threshold for repair at a low
level reduces the number of leaks that evolve into bigger leaks (requiring more difficult
and expensive repair).
In the Netherlands the threshold levels for leak repair are more stringent and also
distinguish between carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic substances.
In general terms, the level of fugitive emissions will depend on such factors as:
̇ vapour pressure of the substance being handled

̇ number and type of sources
̇ method of determination (estimation or monitoring)
̇ inspection and maintenance regime for sources

̇ rate of production (to a lesser extent)

There are several established techniques for the quantification of fugitive losses from a
plant. Most techniques first require an accurate component count and the establishment
of a database. This can be carried out using unit flow plans, by field inspection or a
combination of both. In making the component count, all process pipe work is normally
considered, but small diameter instrument connections are not (since these include a large
number of very small valves with relatively low potential leak rate). Components are
classified in terms of type, service and process conditions to identify those elements with
the highest potential for fugitive loss and to facilitate the application of industry standard
leak factors. An estimate of overall fugitive emissions from the plant can be derived but
experience shows that this can give an over-estimation of fugitive losses.
A more accurate emission quantification typically involves deducing a leak rate (kg/year)
from the screening value for each point, adding the leak rates of all leak sources and
integrating over the reporting time period (typically one year). At each stage,
uncertainties creep into the calculation and so the quantification of fugitive emissions is
fairly inaccurate, even if it is based on the results of an extensive sniffing campaign.
Estimations of emission levels may be validated by gas imaging [European Sealing
Association], dispersion modeling (to predict atmospheric mass flux and concentrations)
and environmental monitoring techniques (to compare the predicted and measured
situations).
C. Targeted monitoring
Since leak detection is a labor intensive and expensive activity it is important to develop a
methodology that minimizes the work whilst maximizing the reductions in fugitive
emissions. Monitoring programmes for sniffing consider and adjust the following
parameters to define the most suitable programme:
̇ The monitoring frequency: at what time interval should potential leak points be
screened for leaks?
̇ The percentage of hardware that needs to be monitored: sampling can help reduce
costs while providing reliable indications on the trend in emissions from the related
components
̇ The type of hardware that needs to be monitored: what are the limits in size, service
or type of hardware beyond which screening for leaks is not beneficial?
‘Targeted Monitoring’ defines a programme that directs the main effort at the leak points
with the highest rate of leakage. It involves the following steps:
̇ Make a survey of all potential leak points on the plant: Ideally, a complete plant
survey should be carried out using up-to-date piping and instrumentation drawings to
establish population counts of equipment and fittings. The survey should cover gas,
vapour and light liquid duties. In large plants the survey costs force a staged
approach, either by dividing the plant into units or by first screening only valves /
rotating equipment followed later by the screening of flanges. Alternatively,
sampling can be used on items on which low leak rates are expected (e.g., flanges) to
assess their rate of leakage.
̇ Analyze the results of first screening survey: There are always large differences in the
leak rates of components and it is often impossible to predict which components will
leak most. This analysis is best performed with the aid of a database that records

relevant data on each potential leak point. The potential leak points can be divided
into families (e.g., by type of component, size, service) and the percentage of
elements leaking above a defined threshold (e.g., 1000 ppm) can be defined for each
family.
̇ Focus further monitoring and repair on those families with the highest percentage of
leaking elements: This maximizes the reduction in fugitive emissions per unit of
expenditure. Sometimes it may be expensive to repair items with high leak
percentages and the contribution of these items to the total fugitive emission must be
considered. If the family contribution to total emission is low (i.e., few items in the
family), then expensive repair may be less justified than to other items contributing
more to the total (but with a smaller percentage of leaking elements).
̇ Define whether high leak percentages are caused by structural causes (e.g.,
inadequate gasket material, wrong type of valve) and define corrective action
accordingly.
̇ As effective repairs are carried out on the components having the highest focus, shift
the priority to new families of components that rise to the top of the list.
̇ Use a sampling strategy to check that families of components having a low
percentage leaking components remain at this level.
This approach has several advantages:
̇ It maximizes the reduction in fugitive emissions and minimizes the cost

̇ It defines improvements that are required in the specification of plant components
̇ It identifies improvements to the repair methods
̇ It means that a significant percentage of all potential leak points do not need to be
screened on an annual basis. Emission calculations are therefore based on a partial
set of screening values and on average emission rates from previous surveys for the
remaining points.
A variety of management systems may also be needed to support the LDAR programme,
for example:
̇ Physical labeling of sources with a unique reference number

̇ Up-to-date maintenance of process and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) showing
the sources
̇ A database of sources (with reference number, equipment manufacturer, gasket
material, etc.), programmed detection survey dates, leak detection results, completed
repair work and planned repair work.
Diffuse and other fugitives sources
The term fugitive emissions can also apply to emissions that arise from process operations
(e.g., opening of vessels, filtering, stirring / agitator seals) and due to volatilization from
liquid spills, effluent collection systems and effluent treatment plants. These fugitive
emissions are measured and controlled using different techniques to those described for
piping and equipment leaks. Relevant operational and maintenance techniques may
include:
̇ Enclose effluent collection systems and tanks used for effluent storage / treatment to
reduce evaporative losses (as long as this does not compromise system safety)

̇ Monitor cooling water for contamination with organics (e.g., from heat exchangers).
Summary of the above VOC control is:
̇ As a result of the efforts to reduce point sources, leaking losses may form a
significant part of the total emissions from the petrochemical industry
̇ Leaking losses are hard to determine and a monitoring programme is a good starting
point to gain insight into the emissions and the causes. This can be the basis of the
action plan
̇ The successful abatement of leaking losses depends heavily on both technical
improvements and the managerial aspects
̇ Abatement programmes can reduce the unabated losses (as calculated by average US-
EPA emission factors) by 80 - 95%
̇ Most reported fugitive emissions are calculated rather than monitored and not all
calculation formats are comparable. Monitoring at well-maintained plants shows that
the average emissions factors are generally higher than measured values
̇ Abatement of fugitive emissions is less process related than process emissions.
Emissions from Wastewater Collection & Treatment: The first level of control is to
ensure that these VOC emissions are minimised by preventing oil from contaminating
storm water drainage and cooling water systems and reducing, as far as possible, the
contamination of process water. The next level of control is to install water seals (traps)
on sewers and drains and gas tight covers on junction boxes in the system. The use of
covers on oil/water separators with good oil removal facilities will prevent or reduce
evaporation of liquid hydrocarbons from exposed surfaces.
3.4.3.5 Combustion gases - NOx control
In terms of pollutants from combustion units, the main emissions are of nitrogen dioxide,
sulphur dioxide and particulates. In view of clean fuels generally used in the integrated
petrochemical complexes, sulphur dioxide and particulate emissions are usually low and
not considered in this section.
NOx control techniques fall into three main categories:
̇ Pre-combustion operational changes

̇ Combustion modifications
̇ Post-combustion flue gas treatment
Pre-combustion operational changes include change in fuel and are not considered further
considering low flexibility in fuel management at petrochemical complex. Technological
options to check NOx emissions can be controlled either by adjusting the combustion
process, or by adjusting the parameters responsible for high NOx emission or by flue gas
treatment. Low NOx burner technology for ethylene cracking furnaces has been
developed for reducing NOx emissions from combustion processes to less than 10 ppm.
Combustion modifications involve changes to the combustion equipment or operating
conditions that either lower the flame temperature or change the concentration of
reactants to minimize NOx formation. They include: low NOx combustors; either low
NOx burners or dry low NOx combustors for gas turbines; flue gas recirculation (FGR) or
steam diluent injection. Post-combustion techniques include Selective Non-Catalytic
Reduction (SNCR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR).

A brief description of NOx control technologies with particular reference to

petrochemical industries is furnished below.
̇ Diluent Injection: Inert diluents, such as flue gas, steam, water, or nitrogen, added to
combustion equipment reduce the temperature and the concentration of NOx
producing reactants in the flame zone thereby reducing thermally formed NOx.
̇ Flue Gas Recirculation: External FGR is applied to boilers to increase the diluent
effect, hence to reduce combustion temperature. Safety considerations due to the
possibility of explosion in the event of a tube burst make FGR impractical for fired
heater applications.
̇ Steam or Water Injection: This technique is widely applied to gas turbines both in
new installations and retrofits and is also applicable to fired heaters and boilers.
Capital cost is less than that of SCR, making the technology a good first choice for
substantial levels of NOx reductions, with SCR often added on if higher NOx
reduction is needed. Substantial recurring operating costs are however encountered
for producing high purity steam, and also maintenance costs for re-blading may be
high.
̇ Low NOx Burners: Low NOx burners, either air staged or fuel staged, aim in
reducing peak temperature, reducing oxygen concentration in the primary combustion
zone and reducing the residence time at high temperature, thereby decreasing
thermally formed NOx. Staging of fuel addition is also thought to provide a
reburning effect, further reducing the NOx. The decreases obtained by low NOx
burners average around 40%. Ultra-low NOx burners add internal recirculation of
flue gases to the features of the low NOx burner, enabling NOx reductions of 75 % or
better. Application is straightforward for new installations of both fired heaters and
boilers. Retrofitting of low NOx burners depends on the furnace design and may be
simple, difficult or impossible due to the increased flame volume, i.e., the flame size
is too large for the size of radiant box. In many cases retrofitting requires major
changes to the furnace floor structure and controls that add greatly to the capital cost.
This substantially increases the cost per unit of NOx removed, thus reducing the cost
effectiveness of this technique. For new installations capital expenditure may be
higher, but operating and maintenance costs of low NOx burners are comparable to
that of standard burners.
̇ SNCR: SNCR is a non-catalytic process for removing oxides of nitrogen from the
flue gas by gas phase reaction of ammonia or urea at high temperature, i.e., around
950°C. The reactant is injected through multiple nozzles into the radiant or
convection section of process furnaces and boilers. To achieve good mixing, the
small amount of reactant is injected along with a carrier gas, usually air or steam.
NOx reductions up to 60% have been demonstrated, if the flue gas temperature is as
per design. At lower or higher than design loads however, the effectiveness
decreases. Cost considerations include the initial capital costs for modifying the
furnace or boiler, piping to inject the reactant, the reactant supply system and a
recurring cost for ammonia or urea to react with the NOx.
̇ SCR: The SCR process removes nitrogen oxides by reaction of ammonia vapour with
flue gas over a catalyst bed where NOx is reduced to nitrogen and water vapour.
Catalysts are available to achieve a high level of NOx reduction in narrow
temperature windows from 250 to 550 °C. This greatly increases the flexibility of
SCR for retrofit applications. However, considerable plot space is needed for its
installation, often making SCR impractical or cost ineffective for retrofit installations.
Capital investment includes the structure to hold the catalyst and the cost of the
catalyst. Additional charges for retrofit applications include the cost of structural

modifications and ductwork. Like SNCR, an ammonia injection and supply system
and a recurring cost for ammonia to react with NOx is required. SCR can achieve
near 90% reduction of NOx except at very low NOx concentrations, where NOx
reduction is typically about 75%.
3.4.4 VOC emissions
Typical sources of VOC emissions in petrochemical industry are: fugitive leaks from
equipments, loading and transfer operations, wastewater treatment units, storage tanks,
Such fugitive VOCs leaks from equipment, loading, wastewater treatment and storage
tanks account to 50-60%, 20-30%, 10-15% and 10-15% respectively.
Storage Tanks: Emissions from storage tanks may contribute significantly to the total
hydrocarbon emissions. The controls to be specified for each type of fluid, needs to be
worked out preferably based on assessment of quantum of emissions, nature of
hydrocarbons emitted (i.e., their toxicity) and the percentage reduction achieved by the
controls.
Oil-Water Separators: Assessing the safety of control technologies is of paramount

importance. Since the covering of API separators can potentially lead to explosive
environment in the Oil Water separators, suitable safety measures need to be
incorporated.
LDAR: LDAR program for typical Indian petrochemical industries may include:
Development of count and characteristics of leaking equipment. Each petrochemical

complex needs to develop a complete checklist of pumps, compressors, valves and
pressure relief devices existing in the plant. The checklist should also include associated
characteristics such as:
̇ Type of equipment and type of seal

̇ Nature of fluid handled including the percentage of fluid that can be characterized as
“hazardous” or toxic meaning the components being suspected to cause human health
problems
̇ A limited survey to be carried out in the Indian petrochemical industries to assess the
emission factors. The emission factors provided by API and USEPA may not be
valid and this is discussed in the section on assessment of impacts from VOC
emissions later in this chapter
Judicious selection of the items in LDAR can be made based on the above efforts
resulting in a programme, which returns significant fugitive VOC reductions at a unit cost
far below a programme that is very conservative in defining all the above items.
LDAR may sound to be simple; however it calls for significant time, effort and attention
once implemented with commitment. Safety inspection procedures do exist for the
inspection and maintenance of these equipment and best results are expected if the same
program (currently catering to the safety requirement) can be tailored so as to address
fugitive emissions. Plants and storage handling feed/product which is contributing to
significant VOC emissions are to be identified and prioritized for implementing control
options.

Table 3-7: Levels of Control for Atmospheric Emissions
Source Type/ Level I Level II Level III

Pollutant
Fugitive Emissions
Valve Fugitive/ HC ̇ Low leak valves ̇ Same as in Level I ̇ Low leak valves in
in new ̇ Limited leak new installations
installations detection & repair ̇ Defined LDAR
̇ Inspections as per
safety
requirements
Flanges Fugitive/ HC ̇ Inspection as per ̇ Same as in Level I ̇ Defined LDAR
safety ̇ Limited leak
requirements detection & repair
Pumps Fugitive/ HC ̇ Mechanical seals ̇ Same as in Level I ̇ Double mechanical
(single/ double) on ̇ Limited leak seals on centrifugal
new installations detection & repair pumps in new
̇ Inspection as per installations
safety ̇ Defined LDAR
requirements
Compressors Fugitive/ HC ̇ Low leak seals in ̇ Same as in Level I ̇ Same as in Level I
new installations ̇ Limited leak ̇ Defined LDAR
̇ Inspection as per detection & repair
safety
requirements
Pressure Fugitive/ HC ̇ Design & ̇ Same as in Level I ̇ Same as in Level I
Relief Inspection as per ̇ Defined LDAR
Valves safety
requirements
API Fugitive/ HC ̇ Minimizing oil in ̇ Same as in Level I ̇ Covers with or
separator the inlet and without vapor control
̇ Removable covers
Storage Fugitive/ HC ̇ Design as per ̇ Floating roof ̇ Same as in Level II
Tanks safety tanks for lighter
requirements materials
̇ Floating roofs for ̇ Fixed cum
lighter materials floating roof tanks
for toxic materials
such as benzene,
toluene
̇ Vapor recovery
for toxic material
loading
̇ Double seals in
floating roof tanks
Process Emissions (Vents)
Various VOCs ̇ Flare ̇ Same as in level I ̇ Same as in level I
Process ̇ Furnace
Units ̇ Incinerator
̇ Atmosphere
Fuel Combustion
Boilers and Stack/SO2 ̇ Energy ̇ Use of low ̇ Same as in Level II
Process conservation sulphur fuel < 1%
measures

Source Type/ Level I Level II Level III

Pollutant
heaters
Stack/NOx ̇ Energy ̇ Use of low NOx ̇ Same as in Level II
conservation burners and
measures ̇ SCR/ SNCR
3.4.5 Monitoring & reporting of air emissions
Atmospheric emissions from petrochemical complexes are characterized by large number

of small volume sources hence the considerations for monitoring of air emissions have
evolved accordingly.
SO2 emission monitoring
Monitoring of SO2 emissions can be carried out using following techniques:
̇ Direct monitoring of stack emissions by use of analyzers

̇ Indirect estimation via measuring of relevant process parameters such as fuel
consumption and sulphur content of the fuel
The method used in arriving at the figures reported in the Environmental statements is not
clear. There is a need to standardize this aspect.
A point of attention here is the robustness of the apparatus used for direct monitoring in
view of fouling, which may occur in a flue gas duty. Indirect monitoring is much more
cost effective than directly measuring the SO2 content of flue gases. However, the
method used should be transparent and verifiable. Petrochemical industries may suggest
indirect monitoring methods, which can be verifiable and transparent.
NOx emission monitoring
In addition to periodic flue gas sampling normally required by regulations, Continuous

Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) are sometimes required. Such monitoring has
been done in several Industrial installations using NOx specific analysers in the CEMS.
However, recently, predictive emission monitoring systems (PEMS) have been
demonstrated in some countries to be accurate and reliable monitoring devices and have
begun to be accepted by regulatory authorities as an alternative analyzer system. PEMs
make use of existing process sensors already installed at the facility for operational and
other environmental compliance measurements, along with an understanding of how these
measurements affect NOx emissions, to predict NOx emission levels. Using existing
process sensors provides a more cost-effective approach than continuous measurement of
NOx emissions. In the of NOx monitoring, PEMS would likely include measurements of
air preheat temperature, furnace operating temperature, fuel hydrogen content, oxygen
concentration in the flue gas and ambient humidity.
Monitoring of VOCs
Following two issues may be taken into consideration for VOC emission monitoring and
reporting:

̇ Technologies available for plant surveillance

̇ Estimation and reporting of emissions from major sources
Plant surveillance is for monitoring of emissions and ensuring that levels in the ambient
air are within acceptable limits. Plant surveillance for the purpose of hydrocarbon
emission control can be carried out by use of portable hand held monitors.
However, the issue of estimating emissions is more closely related to assessment of

impacts, reporting of emission quantity and quality, benchmarking and also for
prioritizing the areas for application of control technology.
i. Monitoring technologies available
Monitoring/ Surveillance for VOC emissions has been done by use of portable hand held
devices or installation of continuous analyzers at selected locations in the hydrocarbon
processing plants. Any systematic approach will involve following:
̇ Frequency of monitoring
̇ Number of analyzers
̇ Location
̇ Speciation of the hydrocarbons
Petrochemical complexes may formulate a plan for monitoring/surveillance using a
combination of portable hand held and continuous analyzers detailing the above aspects.
Summary of reports generated from this may be included in the environmental statements.
ii. Estimation of VOC emissions
Estimation of VOC emissions requires emission factors, count and characteristic of

equipment/source. In general separate procedures are used for leak and non-leak sources.
Leak sources
The estimate of population of each type of fitting is as important as the emission factor in
determining total emissions. Further, the fitting counts need to be broken down into
service categories such as Light liquid, Heavy liquid, HC Gas and Hydrogen which
correspond to the emission factors. It is essential that Indian petrochemical industries
develop a count of equipment sources along with their type and design features. This
information will be valuable not only for the estimation of emissions but also in
implementing control programs.
Non-Leak sources
The approach will involve following three steps:
̇ Distribution of total hydrocarbon unit emissions among the appropriate streams

̇ Application of stream analysis to get component emissions from each stream
̇ Summing up of the stream components to get unit component emissions

iii. Impacts of VOC emissions and prioritizing controls
Environmental impacts due to VOC emissions and the hazardous components of the same
will depend on the following variables:
̇ Plant configuration and products

̇ Plant layout
̇ Calculated emissions
̇ Meteorological conditions
̇ Hydrocarbon component breakdown
A gas-based petrochemical complex with small number of products will have
significantly different emissions and quite different component breakdown, probably
resulting in lower impacts. The plant layout may be even more critical than the emission
rate, especially from the hydrocarbon species. Fugitive emissions are released near
ground level, and thus are subject to much less dispersion than stack emissions. A
petrochemical plant layout with process units right on the boundary line will show much
higher hydrocarbon concentrations at the boundary than one with a buffer zone around the
processing area. The situation is further complicated when looking at individual species.
For instance, a complex consisting of a reformer, an aromatics extraction unit, and a BTX
fractionation unit would result in moderate to low total hydrocarbons, but they would
probably result in higher impacts.
3.5 Energy and Fuel Management
Energy and fuel management is an important aspect in the environmental performance of

a petrochemical complex. Fuel combustion to meet energy requirements contributes a
major component of petrochemical plant atmospheric emission.
3.5.1 Environmental considerations
Elements for environmental considerations of the energy system are:
̇ Fuel consumption and efficient energy use

̇ Fuel sulphur content and SO2 emissions
̇ Nitrogen oxide formation in the combustion process
̇ Particle formation from ash and incomplete burnout
Fuel saving, especially of residual fuel, by increasing energy efficiency, has a beneficial
influence on all four parameters.
Petrochemical fuel gas predominantly comprises hydrogen, methane, C2-C5 hydrocarbons

(saturated/unsaturated), hydrogen sulphide, mercaptans, sometimes and nitrogen in
varying quantities.
3.6 Non-routine conditions
These operations relate to two main events. Firstly, the infrequent or unplanned shutdown
or upset and the planned ‘turnarounds’ or shutdowns of petrochemical plant and
equipment for maintenance or inspection. As all these operations involve the controlled
release of hydrocarbons from plant and equipment, there is potential release of VOCs,
contaminated water and solid materials (e.g., sludge and catalysts). As such,

petrochemical units are designed and operated to prevent unnecessary emissions during
these periods.
3.6.1 Unplanned events
These often involve the need to dispose off large quantities of VOC materials due to
overpressure effects during upset conditions. Standard technology is to route most
hydrocarbon service relief to the flare system, where the gases can be combusted and
disposed of in elevated flares.
3.7 Waste management
Petrochemical plants generate a wide variety of solid waste streams. Basically,

petrochemical solid waste streams fall into two main groups, i.e., intermittently generated
wastes and continuously generated wastes. Intermittent wastes are generally those that
result from cleaning within the process areas and off-site facilities. The following are
typical intermittent waste streams:
̇ Spent catalysts from certain processing units and product treatment wastes such as
spent filter clay
̇ Process vessel sludge, storage tank sediments, vessel scale, and other deposits
generally removed during turnarounds
̇ Annual volume of intermittent wastes is strongly a function of individual plant waste
management and housekeeping practices.
Continuous wastes (those requiring disposal at less than two weeks interval) can be
further can be categorized into two groups viz. process unit wastes and wastewater
treatment wastes.
3.7.1 Solid/hazardous waste generation from ethylene cracker
Relatively little solid waste is generated in steam cracking process when running on gas
or naphtha. The bulk of steam cracker solid waste is organic sludge and coke, but there
are also specific generations of spent catalyst, spent adsorbents and solvent purges. In
addition, there are generic wastes, such as spent oil, oil filters/cartridges and air-drying
adsorbents.
̇ Organic sludge: Organic sludge is liquid, pasty or solid materials collected during
normal operation, start-up, shutdown, drainage and cleaning of the unit. They
typically arise from API separators, the quench oil system, spent methanol, spent
lubricating oil, bottoms drains of vessels and settlers, and polymeric material
removed from pump strainers and filters.
̇ Coke: Coke fines are recovered from gas dedusting during decoking.
̇ Spent catalysts: Catalysts (from acetylene, butadiene, and steam cracked naphtha
hydrogenation units) have an economic lifetime of roughly 5 years. Once efficiency
declines to an unacceptable level spent catalysts are generally returned to the catalyst
supplier for recovery of the noble metal.
̇ Spent adsorbents: Drying adsorbents (alumina, molecular sieves) have a typical
economic lifetime of 3 - 4 years. They are generally landfilled after regeneration/
deactivation.

3.7.2 Solid/hazardous waste generation from aromatics plants
The major solid waste categories are:
̇ Catalysts: from the liquid or gas phase hydrogenation of olefins/diolefins and

sulphur. Catalysts have a typical lifetime of 2 to 5 years. Spent catalysts are typically
processed by a reclaimer, often the catalyst supplier himself, to separate the valuable
metal for re-use from an inert support usually disposed of via landfill. Catalysts used
in Toluene Disproportionation or Xylene isomerization can have lifetimes up to 10
years.
̇ Clay: from olefins removal and typically having a lifetime of 6 months to 2 years.
Clay is typically processed via landfill or incineration for disposal.
̇ Adsorbents: from xylenes separations and typically consisting of alumina or
molecular sieves which can have a lifetime as low as 3 to 4 years, but typically more
like 10 years. Adsorbents are typically disposed to landfill.
̇ Sludge / solid polymerization material: recovered from process equipment during
maintenance activities. It is typically incinerated offsite but can be used on-site as a
fuel source. Solvent regeneration is typically used in many aromatics complexes to
remove a more concentrated stream of sludge from the process. This reduces solvent
losses to the environment.
̇ Oil contaminated materials and oily sludge: (from solvents, bio-treatment and
water filtration) are incinerated under carefully controlled conditions, with associated
heat recovery.
Waste generated in petrochemical industries fall into two main categories:
̇ Non-hazardous waste, including industrial and domestic e.g., scrap metal and
“domestic” wastes.
̇ Hazardous waste, e.g., sludge with toxic organic and heavy metal content.
– Oven Debris
– Oil-containing bleaching earth
– Acid tar
– Sulphur-containing residue from sulphur removal
– Oil-containing sludge
– Oil emulsions
– Oil-containing acid
– Tar residue made with coal tar
– Sludge from wastewater purification
– Residual liquid and paste-like organic substances made with aromatic, aliphatic
and napthenic hydrocarbons
– Residue from alkali wash of fuels
3.7.3 Composition of petrochemical industry waste streams
Composition of waste streams is a very important aspect in the management of wastes.

Composition determines to a large extent the handling, treatment and disposal options.

Characterization of waste streams poses challenges because the contaminants of concern

may be present only in trace levels.
The hazardous substances found in the petrochemical waste are:
̇ Trace metals
̇ Trace Organics (including halogenated)
It is also to be noted that in addition to presence of toxic contaminants, the waste also
needs to be analyzed for toxic characteristics. The toxic characteristics include:
̇ Reactivity
̇ Corrosivity
̇ Reactivity
̇ Toxicity
Toxicity test is of special concern in petrochemical waste streams. This basically
comprises Leachate Procedure tests and the one most widely used has been Toxicity
Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) as defined by USEPA.
It is recommended that petrochemical industries carry out systematic analysis of waste

generated. It is suggested that petrochemical industries develop competence either in-
house or in reputed certified laboratories for the purpose of waste characterization.
Standard methods specified in SW 846 (USEPA) or ASTM may be used for this purpose.
3.7.4 Technology for waste treatment
Three levels of technology for treatment and disposal of petrochemical wastes may be as
follows:
̇ Level I: Technology currently employed by typical facilities

̇ Level II: Better technologies currently employed on a commercial scale
̇ Level III: Technology necessary to provide adequate health and environmental
protection
It is to be noted that environmental adequacy is to be evaluated under varied geologic and
climatologic conditions and the technology in this context should primarily prevent
environmental stress on ground water supplies. Following tables contain a description of
three levels of treatment and disposal technology associated with some of the waste
streams generated by the petrochemical industry. Hazardous waste management is a
complex task requiring investigation in field for evaluating performance and developing
action plans.
Table 3-8: Technology Levels for API (Oil/Water) Separator Sludge
Factor
Waste An oil-water emulsion containing large quantities of water, which has settled to the bottom
Description of the separator. A considerable diversity of wastewater streams are routed to this unit
influencing waste generation rates, waste characteristics and potential hazards.
Generation rate Highly variable
Physical and High in water content the chemical characteristics of material are dependent on the oil which
chemical is routed to the units. Organics are of concern.

Factor
properties
Level I Level II Level III
Treatment/ ̇ Deoiling/ ̇ Same as ̇ Oil recovery process to ensure absence of

Disposal dewatering Level I leachable hazardous organic constituents
Technology using centrifuge ̇ Land-farming in hydro-geologically secure
̇ Storage in pit area, and assisted by specially cultured
microorganism and protected by berm to
pond any storm runoff
̇ Solidification
̇ Secured landfill
Adequacy of ̇ Insufficient ̇ Insufficient ̇ Adequate
technology information information ̇ Adequate
̇ Inadequate ̇ Adequate
̇ Adequate
Problems ̇ Residual oil ̇ Minimal ̇ Minimal
which may have ̇ Minimal
hazardous ̇ Minimal
constituents ̇ Minimal
̇ Migration of
constituents
Monitoring & ̇ (1), (2) Minimal ̇ (1) Minimal ̇ (1) Use observation wells, Monitor for
Surveillance at present at present hazardous constituents
̇ (2) Air pollution monitoring
Table 3-9: Technology Levels for Temporary Waste Storage
Factor
Waste description All hazardous wastes generated at site and stored before further treatment/disposal
Generation rate NA
Physical and Liquids, Sludge or solid
chemical properties
Level I Level II Level III
Technology ̇ Drums ̇ Dedicated Storage facility ̇ Same as Level II
̇ Concrete pads with runoff protection ̇ Storage facility
̇ Drying beds ̇ Sludge in HDPE bags bottom protection
̇ Liquids in drums
Adequacy of ̇ Inadequate information ̇ Adequate ̇ Adequate
technology ̇ Inadequate information ̇ Adequate ̇ Adequate
̇ Inadequate information ̇ Adequate
Problems ̇ Drum leakage ̇ Bottom layer leakage ̇ Level II

̇ Surface runoff & bottom ̇ Damage to bags ̇ None
layer leakage ̇ Drum leakage
̇ Bottom layer leakage
Monitoring & ̇ Minimal ̇ Minimal ̇ Regular inspection of

Surveillance bags, containers,
drums
̇ Groundwater
monitoring

3.7.5 Waste storage
Wastes awaiting disposal must be stored in an environmentally acceptable manner, and

shall not lead to secondary environmental problems such as odor or pollution of
groundwater due to rainwater percolation through or run-off from the site. Storage should
best be in closed vessels, containers or bags, on a site surrounded by a bund wall or toe
wall, with drainage to a prepared system. Special precautions are of course required for
pyrophoric materials to eliminate the risk of fires; they must be kept wet, sealed or
blanketed with inert gas.
3.7.6 Recycle and reuse
In the last decades, the quantity of waste from the industry which is recycled and reused
has grown in many countries and continues to do so. The methods applied vary with the
type of waste, e.g., for sludge, recovery of oil during treatment. The aim of recycle and
reuse methods is to reuse the waste for its original purpose or to find an alternative use for
it to avoid its final disposal. Therefore, waste production is reduced while natural
resources are conserved and/or protected.
Most of the reuse practices reported in the environmental statements are for off-site
recovery from waste stream. Industries opting for this route are required to take due care
to avoid secondary pollution from recyclers facility. The material is to be sold to only
authorized agencies with necessary approvals.
3.7.7 Waste pre-treatment- sludge reduction processes
Treatment methods are used for two main purposes:
̇ To reduce the quantity of waste requiring disposal

̇ To recover the oil for recycling
A large proportion of petrochemical wastewater sludge is being treated for one or both of
the above reasons.
The choice of whether to treat and if so which treatment to use depends on many factors
including the composition of the sludge and the choice of disposal route.
Centrifugation exploits the difference in density between solids and liquids (or two liquid
phases) to separate them by applying centrifugal force. Two main types of decanter
centrifuge can be applied at petrochemical wastewater facilities: 2-phase, which yields a
solids cake plus a single effluent stream (mixed oil and water); and 3-phase which, as the
name suggests, yields separate oil and water streams, as well as the cake. The
applications in ETP have been use of decanter centrifuges.
Advantages of decanter centrifuges include resource recovery, flexibility and high volume
reduction. With good operation, cake suspended solid contents of up to 20% can be
achieved.
Dewatering/deoiling is used to decrease the quantity of sludge for disposal and to recover
oil from them.
The performance of these technologies is not known. It is expected that with the use of
new format for reporting this detail will be available.

3.7.8 Waste disposal methods
All disposals must be carried out at authorized and assessed landfill facilities.
3.8 Summary of Applicable National Regulations
3.8.1 General description of major statutes
A compilation of legal instruments which are applicable to the petrochemical industry is

annexed as Annexure III.
3.8.2 General standards for discharge of environmental pollutants
General standards are applicable wherever industry-specific standards are not mentioned
or notified. General standards for discharge of environmental pollutants as per CPCB are
given in Annexure IV.
3.8.3 Industry-specific requirements
Petrochemicals (Basic & Intermediates): Standards for Liquid Effluent
Table 3-10: Petrochemicals (Basic & Intermediates): Standards for Liquid Effluent
Parameter Concentration not to exceed limits in

mg/l (except pH)
pH 6.5-8.5
o
BOD (3 days at 27 C) 50
Phenol** 5
Sulphide as S 2
COD 250
Cyanide as CNO 2
Fluoride as F*** 15
Total suspended solids 100
Chromium****
Hexavalent 0.1
Total 2.0
* The state boards may prescribed the BOD value of 30mg/l if the recipient system so
demands
** The limit for phenol shall be conformed at the outlet of effluent treatment of phenol
cumeme plant. However, at the disposal point, the limit shall be less than 1mg/l.
***The limit for fluoride shall be conformed at the outlet of fluoride removal unit.
However, at the disposal point fluoride concentration shall be lower than 5mg/l.

****This implies for total and hexavalent chromium shall be conformed at the outlet of
the chromate removal unit. This implies that in the final treated effluent, total and
hexavalent chromium shall be lower than prescribed herein.
3.8.4 Pending and proposed regulatory requirements
3.8.4.1 Proposed national emission standards for petrochemical plants
Table 3-11: Emission Standards for Heater/Furnace/Boilers/Vaporizers
S.No. Parameter Maximum emission Limit (mg/Nm3)

Existing New plants/expansion
plants (commissioned after
January 01, 2007)
1 NOx Gas firing 350 150
Liquid firing 400 250
2 SOx Liquid firing 1700 850
3 CO Carbon mono oxide limit in case of 150 150
partial oxidation in PA, MA, PTA
and DMT plant
4 SPM Liquid firing 150 100
Note: (1). All values are corrected to 3% O2. (2).At the time of decoking, wet scrubber
shall be operated.
Table 3-12: Emission Standards for Organic Particulates
S.No. Petrochemical compound Maximum emission Limit (mg/Nm3) Mass

flow limit
Existing New (gm/hr)
plants plants/expansion
(commissioned after
January 01,2 007)
1 Phthalic anhydride (PA), 50 25 100*
Maleic anhydride (MA),
Toluene Di-isocyanate (TDI)
Note: * - Mass flow limit (gm/hr) is applicable for new plants and expansion plants.
Table 3-13: Emission Standards for Process Emission (Specific Organic Pollutants)
S.No. Parameter Source Maximum emission Limit

(mg/Nm3)
1 Chlorine EDC/VCM plant and incinerator 10
2 HCl EDC/VCM plant and incinerator 30
3 Ammonia Process vent (wastewater stripper) 75
acrylonitrile plant, caprolactum plant
4 H 2S Naphtha pre-treatment plant, olefin 05
plant
5 Phosgene Generated in TDI and MDI plants 01

6 HCN Acrylonitrile plant 10
Table 3-14: Emission Standards for VOC-HAPs from Process Vents
S.No. Parameters Maximum emission Limit

Existing plant New plants/ Expansion
(mg/Nm3)
(mg/Nm3) (gm/hr)
1 (Toluene Di- 0.1 0.1 0.5
isocyanate) TDI,
Methylenediphenyl
Di-isocyanate (MDI)
2 Benzene, Butadiene 5.0 5.0 25.0
3 EO, VCM, EDC, 20.0 10.0 50.0
ACN, PO
Table 3-15: Emission Standards for VOC (General) from Process Vents
S.No. Petrochemical process/compounds Maximum emission Limit (mg/Nm3),

dry basis
1 MA, PA, Phenol 20
2 Ethyl benzene (EB), Styrene, Toluene, 100
Xylene, Aromatics, EG, PG
3 Non-methane HC (paraffin), Acetone, 150
olefins
Table 3-16: Standards for Atmospheric Storage Tanks of

Petrochemical Products
S.No. TVP, kPa at 20 0C Storage Tank Capacity (M3)
1 >10 4 – 75
2 10 – 76 75 – 500
3 10 – 76 >500
4 >76 >75
Note:
1. Requirement for seals in Floating Roof Tanks:
(i) IFRT & EFRT are to be provided with secondary seal with minimum vapour recovery
of 96%.
(ii) Primary seal will be liquid or shoe mounted for EFRT and vapour mounted for IFRT.
Maximum seal gap width will be 4 cm and maximum gap area will be 200 cm2/m of tank
diameter.
(iii) Secondary seal will be rim mounted. Maximum seal gap width will be 1.3 cm and
maximum gap area will be 20 cm2/m of tank diameter.
(iv) Material of seal and construction should ensure high performance and durability.

2. Fixed Roof Tanks will have vapour control efficiency of 95% or vapour
recovery/balancing efficiency of 90%.
3. Inspection and maintenance of storage tanks should be carried out under strict control.
For the inspection, API RP 575 may be adopted. In-service inspection with regard seal
gap should be carried out once in every six months and repair to be implemented in short
time. In future, possibility of on-stream repair of both seals will be examined.
4. Tanks shall have paint with white colour shade, except for derogation of visually
sensitive area.
Table 3-17: Storage of Benzene, VCM and ACN
1. FRT with vapour to incineration with 99.9% of removal efficiency for VOCs.
(or)
2. EFRT with double seals, emission-reducing roof fitting and fitted with fixed roof with vapor
removal efficiency of at least 99%.
(or)
3. Internal floating roof and nitrogen blanketing in between fixed and floating roofs.
Table 3-18: Standards for Emission from Loading of Volatile Products
S.No. Item (Standards)

Maximum Emission Limit
1 Naphtha:
̇ VOC reduction, % (or) ̇ 99.5 % (or)
̇ Emission, gm/m3 ̇ 5 gm/m3
2 Benzene and Butadiene:
3 Toluene/Xylene:
3.8.4.2 Guidelines
Guidelines for atmospheric storage tank practices
̇ For true vapour pressure up to 10 kPa with tank capacity in the range of 4-75 m3,
Fixed Roof Tank (FRT) with pressure valve vent may be provided.
̇ For true vapour pressure of 10-76 kPa with tank capacity in the range of 75-500 m3,
Internal Floating Roof Tank (IFRT) or External Floating Roof Tank (EFRT) or Fixed
Roof Tank with vapour control or vapour balancing system may be provided.
̇ For true vapour pressure more than 10-76 kPa with tank capacity more than 500 m3,
Internal Floating Roof Tank or External Floating Roof Tank or Fixed Roof Tank with
vapour control system may be provided.
̇ For true vapour pressure more than 76 kPa with tank capacity more than 75 m3, Fixed
Roof Tank with vapour control system may be provided.

LDAR and monitoring protocol
LDAR programme include (i) Block valves; (ii) Control valves; (iii) Pump seals; (iv)
Compressor seals; (v) Pressure relief valves; (vi) Flanges – Heat Exchangers; (vii)
Flanges – Piping; (viii) Connectors – Piping; (ix) Open ended lines; and (x) Sampling
connections. Equipment and line sizes more than 2.54 cm are to be covered.
LDAR programme would be applicable to components for following products/

compounds: (i) hydrocarbon gases; (ii) Light liquid with vapour pressure @ 20°C > 1.0
kPa; and (iii) Heavy liquid with vapour pressure @ 20°C between 0.3 to 1.0 kPa.
LDAR programme would not be applicable for (i) heavy liquids with vapour pressure <
0.3 kPa, it will be desirable to check for liquid dripping as indication of leak (ii)
Equipment and line sizes less than 2.54 cm, less than 300 h service and in vacuum
service. (iii) Equipments and piping during start up and shut down.(iv)Pumps (Canned,
diaphragm, magnetic), Valves (Diaphragm, bellow) and close loop Sampling points and
(v) Non-access able points to the extent of 5% of total plant.
A leak is defined as the detection of VOC concentration more than the values (in ppm)
specified below at the emission source using a hydrocarbon analyser according to
measurement protocol (US EPA – 40 CFR part 60 Appendix-A, method 21 for
determination of VOC leaks may be referred):
Table 3-19: HAP and Volatile HAP Concentrations in LDAR Components
S.No. Component HAP (General) in ppm Volatile HAP* in ppm
w.e.f. w.e.f. w.e.f. w.e.f.

1.1.07 1.1.10 1.1.07 1.1.10
1 Pump / Compressor 10000 5000 3000 2000
2 Valves / Flanges 10000 3000 2000 1000
3 Other components 10000 3000 2000 1000
Note : * - Benzene, butadiene, VCM, EDC, ACN, EO, PO
In addition, any component observed to be leaking by sight, sound or smell, regardless of

concentration (liquid dripping, visible vapour leak) or presence of bubbles using soap
solution should be considered as leak. Frequency of monitoring of leaks and schedule for
repair of leaks as given in Table 3-20 shall be followed:
Table 3-20: Frequency of Monitoring of Leaks and Schedule for Repair of Leaks
S.No. Component Frequency of monitoring Repair schedule
1 Valves/Flanges Quarterly (semi-annual after Repair will be started

two consecutive periods with within 5 working days
<2% leaks and annual after 5 and shall be completed
periods with < 2% leaks) within 15 working days
after detection of leak for
2 Pump seals Quarterly general hydrocarbons.
3 Compressor seals Quarterly In case of benzene, the
leak shall be attended
4 Pressure relief devices Quarterly

S.No. Component Frequency of monitoring Repair schedule
5 Pressure relief (devices Within 24 hours immediately for repair.

after venting)
6 Heat Exchangers Quarterly
7 Process drains Annually
8 Components that are Weekly
difficult to monitor
9 Pump seals with Weekly Immediately
visible liquid dripping
10 Any component with Weekly Immediately
visible leaks
11 Any component after Within a week -
repair/replacement
Following types of monitoring methods may be judiciously employed for detection of

leaks: (i) Photo ionization detector (PID) or flame ionization detector (FID) Instrumental
method of measurement of leaks; (ii) Audio, visual and olfactory (AVO) leak detection;
and (iii) Soap bubble method.
̇ Data on time of measurement & concentration value for leak detection; time of repair
of leak; and time of measurement & concentration value after repair of leak should be
documented for all the components.
̇ Pressure relief and blow down systems should discharge to a vapour collection and
recovery system or to flare.
̇ Open-ended lines should be closed by a blind flange or plugged.
̇ Totally closed-loop should be used in all routine samples.
̇ Low emission packing should be used for valves.
̇ High integrity sealing materials should be used for flanges.
3.8.4.3 General notes
Emission monitoring shall be carried out as per the Emission Regulations – Part III,
published by CPCB. Methods as given in Table 3-21 may be used for measurement of
pollutant concentrations in the emissions.
Table 3-21: Methods for Measurement of Pollutant

Concentrations in the Emissions
S.No. Parameter Method of measurement

1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) USEPA CFR – 40 Part 60 Appendix A
Method 6
2 Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) USEPA CFR – 40 Part 60 Appendix A
Method 7
3 Particulate Matter ( PM) USEPA CFR – 40 Part 60 Appendix A
Method 5
4 Carbon Monoxide (CO) USEPA CFR – 40 Part 60 Appendix A

Method IOA / Combustion analyzer with

electro chemical detect or / NDIR detector
3.8.4.4 CREP action points
CREP action points for petrochemical industry include the following:
̇ Adoption of state-of-art technology

– State of Art technology will be adopted for both process technologies as well
sound engineering practices required for control of emission, at the stage of
design itself in case of new plants
̇ Management of storm water
– For the storm water generated from process area and tank farm area during initial
hours of rain. An arrangement will be made for collection and oil separation
including further treatment as required. Such arrangement will include provision
for buffer tank (holding tank) and monitoring of effluent quality.
̇ Effective detoxification and wastewater treatment scheme
– In order to control high COD and persistent organic pollution including toxic
constituents, industry will select appropriate unit operations for pre-treatment of
effluent within ISBL before sending to the biological treatment systems for better
functioning of ETPs. Action plan for the same will be submitted within 6 months
and implemented within one year (March, 2004)
̇ Control of emission from combustion
– The industry will submit an action plan within six months for improving thermal
efficiency and control of NOx.
̇ Proper functioning of point source emission control systems
– The industry will make efforts for proper operation of pollution control system
(mostly scrubbers) and attainment of desired efficiency within six months. This
will include backup of power supply to the control equipment and arrangement
for frequent sampling and analysis of all critical pollution in the tall gases.
̇ LDAR programme
– As a good operating, the industry will adopt LDAR programme periodically to
check fugitive emissions within six months. The frequency of programme will be
proportionate to the risk potential of carrying fluid. Based on leak detection as
per LDAR programme, action will be taken to eliminate fugitive emissions. This
will be a continuous activity.
̇ Handling of halogenated organics
– The industry will submit an action plan to ensure that no halogenated organics is
sent to the flares in order to avoid formation of persistent organic pollutants. All
HAPs had halogenated organics will be routed to the incineration system having
end- on –pollution control facility.
̇ Control of fugitive emissions of carcinogenic compounds
– Fugitive emissions of carcinogenic compounds (e.g., Benzene) will be controlled
by closed vapor collection and recovery system. Measures will be taken to
monitor health of the work

̇ Management of solid waste

– Proper facilities will be provided for handling and storage of hazardous waste
with manifest system in case transported to other places. For incinerable waste,
properly designed incinerator will be installed within the premises or as a
common facility. The non-incinerable hazardous waste should be disposed off in
a secure-land fill.

̇ Proper operation of incinerator

– Industry will check the design and will adopt sound engineering practices for
proper operation of incinerators. Continuous monitoring will be done for
operational parameters and specific parameters in tail gas to ensure the efficient
functioning.
̇ Optimizing the inventory of hazardous chemicals
– Efforts will be made to optimize the inventory, particularly of hazardous
chemicals. Such information will be made available to the Regulatory Agencies
(SPCB). Inspector of Factory & District Collector.
̇ Self – regulation by industry through monitoring and environmental auditing.
– Industry will go for self –assessment and regulation by conducting environmental
auditing regularly, besides having regular monitoring of pollutants in air
emission, liquid effluent and receiving environment.
̇ Organizational restructuring and accreditation of environmental manager of industry
– For self-evaluation, organizational restructuring will be done and the
environmental manager of the industry will be accredited to bring
professionalism in environmental management.

4.
OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF EIA
Prior environmental clearance process has been revised in the Notification issued on 14th
September, 2006, into following four major stages i.e., screening, scoping, public
consultation and appraisal. Each stage has certain procedures to be followed. This
section deals with all the procedural and technical guidance, for conducting objective-
oriented EIA studies, their review and decision-making. Besides, the Notification also
classifies projects into Category A, which requires prior environmental clearance from
MoEF and Category B from SEIAA/UTEIAA.
Consistency with other requirements
̇ Clearance from other regulatory bodies is not a pre-requisite for obtaining the prior
environmental clearance and all such clearances will be treated as parallel statutory
requirements.
̇ Consent for Establishment (CFE) and Prior Environmental Clearance are two
different legal requirements, a project proponent should acquire. Therefore, these two
activities can be initiated and proceeded with simultaneously.
̇ If a project falls within the purview of CRZ and EIA Notifications, then the project
proponent is required to take separate clearances from the concerned Authorities.
̇ Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) issues need not be dealt under the EIA
Notification as other statutory bodies deal with these issues. However, socio-
economic studies may be considered while taking environmental decisions.
4.1 Coverage of the Industry under the Purview of Notification
All the new petro-chemical industrial projects including expansion and modernization
require prior environmental clearance. Based on pollution potential, all these projects are
classified into Category A.
The sequence of steps in the process of prior environmental clearance for Category A
projects are shown in Figure 4.1. The timelines indicated against each stage are the
maximum permissible time lines set in the Notification for said task. In case the said task
is not cleared/objected by the concerned Authority, within the specified time, said task is
deemed to be cleared, in accordance to the proposal submitted by the proponent. Each
stage in the process of prior environmental clearance for the proposed petro-chemical
industry is discussed in subsequent sections.
In case of Expansion or Modernization of the developmental Activity:
̇ Any developmental activity, which has an EIA clearance (existing plant), when
undergoes expansion or modernization (change in process or technology) with
increase in production capacity or any change in product mix beyond the list of
products cleared in the issued clearance is required to submit new application for EIA
clearance.

̇ Any developmental activity, which is listed in Schedule of the EIA Notification and
due to expansion of its total capacity, if falls under the purview of either Category B
or Category A, then such developmental activity requires clearance from respective
Authorities.
Figure 4-1: Prior Environmental Clearance Process

4.1.1 Application for prior environmental clearance
̇ The project proponent, after identifying the site and carrying out a pre-feasibility
study, is required to apply for the prior environmental clearance using Form 1 given
in Annexure V. The proponent has to submit the filled in Form 1 along with the pre-
feasibility report and draft terms of reference for EIA studies to the MoEF,
Government of India. Please refer subsequent sections for the information on how to
fill the Form 1, contents of pre-feasibility report and draft sector-specific ToRs.
̇ Prior environmental clearance is required before starting any construction work, or
preparation of land on the identified site/project or activity by the project
management, except for securing the land.
̇ If the application is made for a specific developmental activity, which has an inherent
area development component as a part of its project proposal and the same project
also attracts the construction and area development provisions under 8a and 8b of the
Schedule, then the project will be seen as a developmental activity other than 8a and
8b of the Schedule.
4.1.2 Siting guidelines
These are the guidelines, stakeholders may consider while siting the developmental
projects, to minimize the associated possible environmental impacts. In some situations,
adhering to these guidelines is difficult and unwarranted. Therefore, these guidelines may
be kept in the background, as far as possible, while taking the decisions.
Areas preferably be avoided
While siting industries, care should be taken to minimize the adverse impact of the
industries on immediate neighborhood as well as distant places. Some of the natural life
sustaining systems and some specific landuses are sensitive to industrial impacts because
of the nature and extent of fragility. With a view to protect such sites, the industries may
maintain the following distances, as far as possible, from the specific areas listed:
̇ Ecologically and/or otherwise sensitive areas: Preferably 5 km; depending on the geo-
climatic conditions the requisite distance may be decided appropriately by the agency.
̇ Coastal areas: Preferably ½ km away from high tide line (HTL).
̇ Flood plain of the riverine system: Preferably ½ km away from flood plain or
modified flood plain affected by dam in the upstream or flood control systems.
̇ Transport/Communication System: Preferably ½ km. away from highway and
railway line.
̇ Major settlements (3,00,000 population): Distance from major settlements is difficult
to maintain because of urban sprawl. At the time of siting of the industry, if the
notified limit of any major settlement is found to be within 50 km from the project
boundary, the spatial direction of growth of the settlement for at least a decade must
be assessed. Subsequently, the industry may be sited at least 25 km from the
projected growth boundary of the settlement.
̇ Critically polluted areas identified by MoEF, from time to time. Current list of
critically polluted areas is given in Annexure VI.

Note:
Ecological and/or otherwise sensitive areas include (i) Religious and Historic Places; (ii)
Archaeological Monuments (e.g., identified zone around Taj Mahal); (iii) Scenic Areas;
(iv) Hill Resorts; (v) Beach Resorts; (vi) Health Resorts; (vii) Coastal Areas rich in
Corals, Mangroves, Breeding Grounds of Specific Species; (viii) Estuaries rich in
Mangroves, Breeding grounds of Specific Species; (ix) Gulf Areas; (x) Biosphere
Reserves; (xi) National Parks and Sanctuaries; (xii) Natural lakes, Swamps; (xiii) Seismic
Zones; (xiv) Tribal Settlements; (xv) Areas of Scientific and Geological Interest; (xvi)
Defence Installations, specially those of security importance and sensitive to pollution;
(xvii) Border Areas (International) and (xviii) Air Ports.
Pre-requisite: State and Central Governments are required to identify such areas on a
priority basis.
General siting factors
In any particular selected site, the following factors must also be recognized.
̇ No forest land shall be converted into non-forest activity for the sustenance of the
industry (Ref: Forest Conversation Act, 1980).
̇ No prime agricultural land shall be converted into industrial site.
̇ Land acquired shall be sufficiently large to provide space for appropriate green cover
including green belt, around the battery limit of the industry.
̇ Lay out of the industry that may come up in the area must conform to the landscape
of the area without affecting the scenic features of that place.
̇ Associated township of the industry may be created at a space having physiographic
barrier between the industry and the township.
4.2 Scoping for EIA Studies
Scoping exercise is taken-up soon after the project contours are defined. The primary
purpose of scoping is to identify the concerns and issues which may affect the project
decisions. Besides, scoping defines the requirements and boundaries of an EIA study..
The results of the scoping exercise form the basis for the rest of the EIA process.
Scoping refers to the process by which the EAC, including applications for expansion
and/or modernization of existing projects, determine ToR for EIA studies addressing all
relevant environmental concerns for the preparation of an EIA Report for a particular
project.
̇ Project proponent shall submit the application to concerned Authority. The

application (Form 1 as given in Annexure V shall be attached with pre-feasibility
report and proposed ToR for EIA Studies. The proposed sequence to arrive at the
draft ToR is discussed below:
– Pre-feasibility report summarizes the project details and also the likely
environmental concerns based on secondary information, which will be availed
for filling the Form 1.
– From pre-feasibility report and Form 1, valued environmental components
(VECs) may be identified for a given project (the receiving environment/social

components, which are likely to get affected due to the project operations/
activities).
– Once the project details from the pre-feasibility report & Form 1; and VECs are
identified, a matrix establishing the interactions which can lead to the effects/
impacts could be developed (Qualitative analysis).
– For each identified possible effect in the matrix, significance analysis could be
conducted to identify the impacts, which needs to be studied further (quantitative
analysis) in the subsequent EIA studies. All such points will find a mention in
the draft ToR to be proposed by the project proponent along with the application
form. The draft ToR shall include applicable baseline parameters (refer
Annexure IX) and impact prediction tools (refer Annexure XI) proposed to be
applied
– The information to be provided in pre-feasibility report, guidelines for filling
Form 1 and guidelines for developing draft ToR is summarized in the subsequent
sections.
– Authority consults the EAC to reply to the proponent. The EAC reviews the
application form, pre-feasibility report and proposed draft ToR by the proponent
and make necessary additions/deletions to make it a comprehensive ToR that
suits the statutory requirements for conducting the EIA studies.
̇ A site visit by sub-committees of EAC will be planned, only if considered necessary
by the EAC with the written approval of the chairperson of EAC. Project proponent
will facilitate such site visits of the sub-committees.
̇ EAC shall provide an opportunity to the project proponent for presentation and
discussions on the proposed project and related issues as well as the proposed ToR for
EIA studies. If the State Government desires to present its views on any specific
project in the scoping stage, it can depute an officer for the same at the scoping stage
to EAC, as an invitee but not as a member of EAC. However, non-appearance of the
project proponent before EAC at any stage will not be a ground for rejection of the
application for the prior environmental clearance.
̇ In case of a new or expansion project in an identified problem area by the CPCB, then
the MoEF may present their views, if any at the stage of scoping, to the EAC.
̇ The final set of ToR for EIA studies shall be conveyed to the proponent by the EAC
within sixty days of the receipt of Form 1 and pre-feasibility report. If the finalized
ToR for EIA studies is not conveyed to the proponent within sixty days of the receipt
of Form 1, the ToR suggested by the proponent shall be deemed as the final and will
be approved for the EIA studies.
̇ Final ToR for EIA studies shall be displayed on the website of the MoEF.
̇ Applications for prior environmental clearance may be rejected by the concerned
Authority based on the recommendations by the EAC at this stage itself. In case of
such rejection, the decision together with reasons for the same shall be communicated
to the proponent in writing within sixty days of the receipt of the application.
̇ The final EIA report and other relevant documents submitted by the applicant shall be
scrutinized by the MoEF strictly with reference to the approved ToR for EIA studies.
4.2.1 Pre-feasibility report
The pre-feasibility report should include, but not limited to highlight the proposed project
information, keeping in view the environmental sensitivities of the selected site, raw

material (feedstock such as naphtha/gas), technology options (cracking process, coking,

etc.) and its availability. Information required in pre-feasibility report varies from case to
case even in same sector depending upon the local environmental setting within which the
plant is located/proposed. However, the information which may be furnished in the pre-
feasibility report may include as under:
I. Executive summary
II. Project details: Description of the project including in particular;
̇ a description of the main characteristics of the production processes, for instance,

nature and quantity of materials used,
̇ an estimate, by type and quantity, of expected residues and emissions (water, air and
soil pollution, noise, vibration, light, heat, radiation, etc.) resulting from the operation
of the proposed project.
̇ a description of the physical characteristics of the whole project and the land-use
requirements during the construction and operational phases
III. Selection of site based on least possible impacts

̇ An outline of the main alternatives studied by the developer and an indication of the
main reasons for this choice, taking into account the environmental effects.
IV. Anticipated impacts based on project operations on receiving environment

̇ A description of the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected by
the proposed project, including, in particular, population, fauna, flora, soil, water, air,
climatic factors, material assets, including the architectural and archaeological
heritage, landscape and the inter-relationship between the above factors.
̇ A description of the likely significant effects of the proposed project on the
environment resulting from:
− existence of the project
− use of natural resources
− emission of pollutants, the creation of nuisances and the elimination of waste
− project proponent’s description of the forecasting methods used to assess the
effects on the environment
V. Proposed broad mitigation measures which could effectively be internalized as
project components to have environmental and social acceptance of the proposed
site
̇ A description of key measures envisaged to prevent, reduce and where possible offset
any significant adverse effects on the environment
VI. An indication of any difficulties (technical deficiencies or lack of know-how)

encountered by the developer in compiling the required information
Details of the above listed points which may be covered in pre-feasibility report are listed
in Annexure VII.

4.2.2 Guidance for providing information in Form 1
The information given in specifically designed pre-feasibility report for this

developmental activity may also be availed for filling Form 1.
Form 1 is designed to help users identify the likely significant environmental effects of
proposed projects right at the scoping stage. There are two stages for providing
information under two columns:
̇ First - identifying the relevant project activities from the list given in Column 2 of
Form 1. Start with the checklist of questions set out below and complete Column 3
by answering:
− Yes - if the activity is likely to occur during implementation of the project
− No - if it is not expected to occur
− May be - if it is uncertain at this stage whether it will occur or not
̇ Second - Each activity for which the answer in Column 3 is “Yes” the next step is to
refer to the fourth column which quantifies the volume of activity which could be
judged as significant impact on the local environmental characteristics, and identify
the areas that could be affected by that activity during construction /operation /
decommissioning of the project. Form 1 requires information within 15 km around
the project, whereas actual study area for EIA studies will be as prescribed by EAC.
Project proponent will need information about the surrounding VECs in order to
complete this Form 1.
4.2.3 Identification of appropriate valued environmental components
VECs are components of natural resources and human world that are considered valuable
and are likely to be affected by the project activities. Value may be attributed for
economic, social, environmental, aesthetic or ethical reasons. VECs represent the
investigative focal point for further EIA process. The indirect and/or cumulative effects
can be concerned with indirect, additive or even synergistic effects due to other projects
or activities or even induced developments on the same environmental components as
would be considered direct effects. But such impacts tend to involve larger scale VECs
such as within entire region, river basins or watersheds; and, broad social and economic
VECs such as quality of life and the provincial economy. Once VECs are identified then
appropriate indicators are selected for impact assessments on the respective VECs.
4.2.4 Methods for identification of impacts
There are various factors which influence the approach adopted for the assessment of
direct, indirect, cumulative impacts, etc. for a particular project. The method should be
practical and suitable for the project given the data, time and financial resources available.
However, the method adopted should be able to provide a meaningful conclusion from
which it would be possible to develop, where necessary, mitigation measures and
monitoring. Key points to consider when choosing the method(s) include:
̇ Nature of the impact(s)

̇ Availability and quality of data
̇ Availability of resources (time, finance and staff)

The method chosen should not be complex, but should aim at presenting the results in a
way that can be easily understood by the developer, decision maker and the public. A
comparative analysis of major impact identification methods is given in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Impact Identification Methods
Description Advantages Disadvantages

Checklists ̇ Annotate the ̇ Simple to ̇ Do not distinguish
environmental features that understand and between direct and
need to be addressed when use indirect impacts
identifying the impacts of ̇ Good for site ̇ Do not link action
activities in the project selection and and impact
priority setting ̇ The process of
̇ Simple ranking incorporating values
and weighting can be controversial
Matrices ̇ Identify the interaction ̇ Link action to ̇ Difficult to
between project activities impact distinguish direct
(along one axis) and ̇ Good method and indirect impacts
environmental for displaying ̇ Significant potential
characteristics (along other EIA results for double-counting
axis) using a grid like table of impacts
̇ Entries are made in the
cells which highlights
impact severity in the form
of symbols or numbers or
descriptive comments
Networks ̇ Illustrate cause effect ̇ Link action to ̇ Can become very
relationship of project impact complex if used
activities and ̇ Useful in beyond simplified
environmental simplified form version
characteristics for checking for
̇ Useful in identifying second order
secondary impacts impacts
̇ Useful for establishing ̇ Handles direct
impact hypothesis and and indirect
other structured science impacts
based approaches to EIA
Overlays ̇ Map the impacts spatially ̇ Easy to ̇ Address only direct
and display them understand impacts
pictorially ̇ Good to display ̇ Do not address
̇ Useful for comparing site method impact duration or
and planning alternatives ̇ Good siting probability
for routing linear tool
developments
̇ Can address cumulative
effects
̇ Information incentive
GIS ̇ Maps the impacts spatially ̇ Easy to ̇ Do not address
and display them understand impact duration or
pictorially ̇ Good to display probability
̇ Useful for comparing site method ̇ Heavy reliance on

Description Advantages Disadvantages

and planning alternatives ̇ Good siting knowledge and data
for routing linear tool ̇ Often complex and
developments ̇ Excellent for expensive
̇ Can address cumulative impact
effects identification
̇ Information incentive and analysis
Expert ̇ Assist diagnosis, problem ̇ Excellent for ̇ Heavy reliance on
System solving and decision impact knowledge and data
making identification ̇ Often complex and
̇ Needs inputs from user by and analysis expensive
answering systematically ̇ Good for
developed questions to experimenting
identify impacts and
determine their mitigability
and significance
̇ Information intensive, high
investment methods of
analysis
The project team made an attempt to construct an impact matrix considering major project
activities (generic operations) and stage-specific likely impacts which is given in Table 4-
2.
While the impact matrix is each project-specific, Table 4-2 may facilitate the stakeholders
in identifying a set of components and phase-specific project activities for determination
of likely impacts. However, the location-specific concerns may vary from case to case;
therefore, the components even without likely impacts are also retained in the matrix for
the location-specific reference.

Operational Aspects of an EIA
Table 4-2: Matrix of Impacts

PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III
Pre-Construction Construction/ Establishment Operation and Maintenance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Civil works such as earth moving
Feedstock handling and storage
Waste management –liquid and

including temporary structures
Disposal of construction wastes
processes and unit operations -

Influx of construction workers
Product handling and storage

Burning of wastes, refuse and
Detailed Topographic Survey
Heavy Equipment operations

Site Preparation / Change in
Transportation of material
Chemical reactions in unit

and building of structures
Project
Generation of sewerage
Product separation and

Land Acquirement
Activities
cleared vegetation
ENVIRONMENT
Cracking process
Deforestation
Site Clearing
Topography
refinement
solid waste
Parameter/
factor
Component
Soil
Erosion Risks *
Contamination * *
Soil Quality *
Resources Fuels/ Electricity * * * *
Raw materials * * *
Land especially
undeveloped or
agricultural land *
Water Interpretation or
Alteration of River Beds *
Alteration of Hydraulic
Regime *
Alteration of surface run-
off and interflow * *
Alteration of aquifers * *
Water quality
* *
Temperature *
Physical
Air Air quality * * * * * *

Noise * * * * *
TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes September 2010

4-10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Climate * *
Terrestrial Effect on grass & flowers * * * *
Flora
Effect on trees & shrubs * * *
Effect on farmland * * *
Endangered species * * *
Aquatic Biota
Habitat removal * *
Contamination of habitats * *
Reduction of aquatic
biota * *
Terrestrial Fragmentation of
Fauna terrestrial habitats * * *
Biological
Disturbance of habitats
by noise or vibration * *
Reduction of Biodiversity * * *
Economy Creation of new
economic activities * *
Commercial value of
properties *
Conflict due to
negotiation and/
compensation payments
Generation of temporary
and permanent jobs *
Effect on crops * * *
Reduction of farmland
productivity *
Income for the state and
private sector
Savings for consumers &
private consumers
Social
Savings in foreign
currency for the state

4-11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Education Training in new
technologies *
Training in new skills to
workers *
Public Order Political Conflicts * *
Unrest, Demonstrations
& Social conflicts * *
Infrastructure Conflicts with projects of
and Services urban, commercial or
Industrial development * *
Security and Increase in Crime *
Safety
Accidents caused by * * *
Health
*
Cultural
Land use * *
Recreation
Aesthetics and human
interest * *
Cultural status
Note:
1. Above table represents a model for likely impacts, which will have to be arrived at on a case-to-case basis considering VECs and significance
analysis (Ref Section 2.9).
2. Project activities are shown as indicative. However, in Form 1 (application for EIA Clearance), for any question for which answer is ‘Yes’, then
the corresponding activity shall reflect in project activities. Similarly ‘parameters’/’factors’ will also be changed within a component in order to
reflect the target species of prime concern in the receiving local environment.

4-12
4.2.5 Testing the Significance of Impacts
The following set of conditions may be used as the checklist for testing the significance of
the impacts and also to provide information in Column IV of Form 1.
̇ Will there be a large change in environmental conditions?

̇ Will new features be out-of-scale with the existing environment?
̇ Will the effect be unusual in the area or particularly complex?
̇ Will the effect extend over a large area?
̇ Will there be any potential for trans-frontier impact?
̇ Will many people be affected?
̇ Will many receptors of other types (fauna and flora, businesses, facilities) be
affected?
̇ Will valuable or scarce features or resources be affected?
̇ Is there a risk that environmental standards will be breached?
̇ Is there a risk that protected sites, areas, and features will be affected?
̇ Is there a high probability of the effect occurring?
̇ Will the effect continue for a long time?
̇ Will the effect be permanent rather than temporary?
̇ Will the impact be continuous rather than intermittent?
̇ If it is intermittent will it be frequent rather than rare?
̇ Will the impact be irreversible?
̇ Will it be difficult to avoid, or reduce or repair or compensate for the effect?
For each “Yes” answer in column 3, the nature of effects and reasons for it should be
recorded in the column 4. The questions are designed so that an “Yes” answer in column
3, will generally point towards the need for analyzing for the significance and
requirement for conducting impact assessment for the effect.
4.2.6 Terms of reference for EIA studies
ToR for EIA studies in respect of the petro-chemical industry may include, but not limited
to the following:
1. Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the
proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a
compilation of EIA report including EMP and the post-project monitoring plan in
brief.
Project description
2. Justification for selecting the proposed plant capacity.

3. Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes,
availability and optimization.
4. Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various facilities/units of the plant.
5. Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations,
along with material and energy inputs and outputs (material and energy balance) for
the production of olefins and aromatics.
6. Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes and equipments to meet
the national standards.

Operational Aspects of EIA
7. Details on requirement of raw material (naphtha/gas feedstock), its source, supply and
storage at the plant. Also include details on feedstock preparation.
8. Details on requirement of auxiliary chemicals and utilities to support the unit
processes.
9. Details of cracker and its yield i.e, ethylene, propylene, butadiene.
10. Details of catalytic reformers/aromatic plant process for its different products –
benzene, toluene, xylene, p-xylene.
11. Details on special environmental precautions during startup and shutdown operations.
12. Details on VOC balance including point sources, fugitive emissions, flare
management, etc.
13. Details on management of Hazardous Air Pollutants – specific plant equipment for
least release rates, closed conveyance of effluents for treatment, etc.
14. Details on proposed LDAR protocol.
15. Details on requirement of energy and water along with its source and authorization
from the concerned department.
16. Details on water balance including quantity of effluent generated, recycled & reused.
Efforts to minimize effluent discharge and to maintain quality of receiving water
body.
17. Details of effluent treatment plant, inlet and treated water quality with specific
efficiency of each treatment unit in reduction in respect of all concerned/regulated
environmental parameters.
18. Details of the proposed methods of water conservation and recharging.
19. Management plan for solid/hazardous waste generation including its composition/
characterization/categorization, storage, utilization and disposal.
20. Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom,
etc., to the workers during construction and operation phase.
21. In case of expansion of existing industries, remediation measures adopted to restore
the environmental quality if the groundwater, soil, crop, air, etc., are affected and a
detailed compliance to the prior environmental clearance/consent conditions.
22. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any
Court of Law related to the environmental pollution and impacts in the last two years,
if so, details thereof.
Description of the environment
23. The study area shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of the proposed
project site.
24. Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances from the project site to
be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).
25. Land use based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as
national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc., for the study area.
26. Demography details of all the villages within the study area.
27. Topography details of the study area.

28. The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t. different components of
environment viz. air, noise, water, land, and biology and socio-economic (please refer
Section 4.4.2 for guidance for assessment of baseline components and identify
attributes of concern). Actual monitoring of baseline environmental components
shall be strictly according to the parameters prescribed in the ToR after considering
the proposed coverage of parameters by the proponent in draft ToR and shall
commence after finalization of ToR by the competent Authority.
29. Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area.
30. Details on groundwater and surface water quality of nearby water sources and other
surface drains for the parameters such as pH*, BOD*, COD*, Phenol*, Sulphide*,
Cyanide*, Fluoride*, Total suspended solids*, Chromium*, etc. (* - as applicable)
31. Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stack and fugitive emissions for
NOx*, SOx*, CO*, SPM*, Chlorine*, HCl*, Ammonia *, H2S*, Phosgene*, HCN*,
Benzene*, HAPs*, etc., and evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution
control devices to meet standards for point sources and to meet AAQ standards. (* -
as applicable)
32. The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of
project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses.
33. Details on noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptors.
34. Site-specific micro-meteorological data including mixing height.
35. One season site-specific data excluding monsoon season.
36. Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the
Competent Authority.
37. Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and
quality, species, diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance,
etc.
38. If any incompatible landuse attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall
describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional
points based on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC. Incompatible
landuse attributes include:
− Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water
− Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts
− Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year
− Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas where industrial activity is not
permitted)
− Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites
− Cyclone, Tsunami prone areas (based on last 25 years);
− Airport areas
− Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features
as locally applicable, including prime agricultural lands, pastures, migratory
corridors, etc.
39. If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe
the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose additional points based
on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC. Ecological sensitive
attributes include:
− National parks

− Wild life sanctuaries

− Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground
− Mangrove area
− Wetlands
− Reserved and Protected forests
− Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, any
other area locally applicable
− Any other eco-sensitive areas
40. If the location falls in Valley, specific issues connected to the natural resources
management shall be studied and presented.
41. If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the
authorized agencies demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and
associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any.
– Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for
specific observations.
– Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the
point of disposal/impact areas.
– Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and
coastal fisheries.
Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures
42. Anticipated generic environmental impacts due to this project are indicated in Table
4-2, which may be evaluated for significance and based on corresponding likely
impacts VECs may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted for all the
concerned VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in
order to identify mitigation measures (please refer Chapter 4 of the manual for
guidance).
43. Tools as given in Section 4.4.3 may be referred for the appropriate assessment of
environmental impacts and same may be submitted in draft ToR for consideration and
approval by EAC.
44. While identifying the likely impacts, also include the following for analysis of
significance and required mitigation measures:
− impacts due to transportation of raw materials (feedstock, auxiliary chemicals,
etc.) and end products on the surrounding environment
− impacts due to release of water pollutants (suspended solids, acid/alkaline
effluents, nitrogen compounds, biodegradable organics, mixtures of oil/organics
in water, volatile organics, heavy metals, heat, etc.) from unit processes on soil,
surface water and groundwater
− impacts due to release of air pollutants (SOx, NOx, VOCs, particulate matter,
acid gases, combustion gases, dioxins, etc.) from catalyst regeneration, tank
vents, loading operations and other unit processes such as distillation,
purification, storage tanks, etc
− impacts due to fugitive and stack emissions
− impacts due to odour pollution
− impacts due to noise during plant operations
− impacts due to release of hazardous waste from storage facilities, unit processes,
construction materials, corrosion/erection mechanisms, maintenance materials,
etc

− impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities

45. In case of likely impact from the proposed project on the surrounding reserve forests,
plan for the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest
Department.
46. For identifying the mitigation measures, please refer Chapter III for source control
and treatment. Besides typical mitigation measures which may also be considered are
discussed in Table 4-5.
47. Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning
schedule etc. in accordance to CPCB published guidelines.
Analysis of alternative resources and technologies
48. Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed
site. Conformity of the site with prescribed guidelines in terms of CRZ, river,
highways, railways, etc.
49. Details on improved technologies.
50. Details on proposed reuse/recycle/recovery options including regeneration of
catalysts.
51. Details on waste minimization options.
Environmental monitoring program
52. Monitoring programme for pollution control at source.

53. Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment for the appropriate notified
parameters – air quality, groundwater, surface water, gas quality, etc., during
operational phase of the project.
54. Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers.
55. Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed, to assess the
possible residual impacts on VECs.
56. Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed
for conducting monitoring.
Additional studies
57. Details on risk assessment and damage control during different phases of the project
and proposed safeguard measures.
58. Details on socio-economic development activities such as commercial property
values, generation of jobs, education, social conflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc.
59. Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the local community. The
plan should include quantitative dimension as far as possible.
60. Details on compensation package for the people affected by the project, considering
the socio-economic status of the area, homestead oustees, land oustees, and landless
labourers.
61. Points identified in the public hearing and commitment of the project proponent to the
same. Detailed action plan addressing the issues raised, and the details of necessary
allocation of funds.

62. Details on plan for corporate social responsibility including the villages, population
spread, SC/ST/backward communities, upgradation of existing schools, establishing
new schools with facilities (such as laboratories, toilets, etc.), link roads, community
halls, primary health facilities, health camps, etc.
Environmental management plan
63. Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project

monitoring programme for approved mitigation measures.
64. EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along
with item-wise cost of its implementation (capital and recurring costs).
65. Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation.
66. Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site and off-site disaster
management plan.
Note:
Above points shall be adequately addressed in the EIA report at corresponding chapters,
in addition to the contents given in the reporting structure (Table 4-6).
4.3 Environmental Impact Assessment
The generic approach for accomplishing EIA studies is shown in Figure 4.3. Each stage is
discussed, in detail in subsequent sections.
Figure 4-2: Approach for EIA Study

4.3.1 EIA team
The success of a multi-functional activity like an EIA primarily depends on constitution

of a right team at the right time (preferable at the initial stages of an EIA) in order to
assess the significant impacts (direct, indirect as well as cumulative impacts).
The professional Team identified for a specific EIA study should consist of qualified and
experienced professionals from various disciplines in order to address the critical aspects
identified for the specific project. Based on the nature and the environmental setting,
following professionals may be identified for EIA studies:
̇ Environmental management specialist/Regulator

̇ Environmental urban landuse planner
̇ Air and noise quality
̇ Organic chemistry specialist
̇ Agronomy
̇ Toxicology/occupational health
̇ Geology/geo-hydrology
̇ Ecologist
̇ Transportation specialist
̇ Safety and risk assessment specialist
̇ Chemical engineer
̇ Social scientist, etc.
4.3.2 Baseline quality of the environment
EIA Notification 2006 specifies that an EIA Report should contain a description of the
existing environment that would be or might be affected directly or indirectly by the
proposed project. Environmental Baseline Monitoring (EBM) is a very important stage of
EIA. On one hand EBM plays a very vital role in EIA and on the other hand it provides
feedback about the actual environmental impacts of a project. EBM, during the
operational phase, helps in judging the success of mitigation measures in protecting the
environment. Mitigation measures, in turn are used to ensure compliance with
environmental standards, and to facilitate the needed project design or operational
changes.
Description of the existing environment should include natural, cultural, socio-economic

systems and their interrelationships. The intention is not to describe all baseline
conditions, but to focus the collection and description of baseline data on those VECs that
are important and are likely to be affected by the proposed industrial activity.
4.3.2.1 Objectives of EBM in EIA context
The term ‘baseline’ refers to conditions existing before development. EBM studies are
carried out to:
̇ identify environmental conditions which might influence project design decisions

(e.g., site layout, structural or operational characteristics);
̇ identify sensitive issues or areas requiring mitigation or compensation;
̇ provide input data to analytical models used for predicting effects;
̇ provide baseline data against which the results of future monitoring programs can be
compared.

At this stage of EIA process, EBM is primarily discussed in the context of first purpose
wherein the feedback from EBM programs may be used to:
̇ determine available assimilative capacity of different environmental components

within the designated impact zone and whether more or less stringent mitigation
measures are needed
̇ improve predictive capability of EIAs
There are many institutional, scientific, quality control, and fiscal issues that must be
addressed in implementation of an environmental monitoring program. Careful
consideration of these issues in the design and planning stages will help avoid many of
the pitfalls associated with environmental monitoring programs.
4.3.2.2 Environmental monitoring network design
Monitoring refers to the collection of data through a series of repetitive measurements of

environmental parameters (or, more generally, to a process of systematic observation).
Design of the environmental quality monitoring programme design depends up on the
monitoring objectives specified for the selected area of interest. Types of monitoring and
network design considerations are discussed in Annexure VIII.
4.3.2.3 Baseline data generation
List of important physical environmental components and indicators of EBM are given in
Table 4-3.
Table 4-3: List of Important Physical Environment Components

and Indicators of EBM
Environmental Component Environmental Indicators

Climatic variables ̇ Rainfall patterns – mean, mode, seasonality
̇ Temperature patterns
̇ Extreme events
̇ Climate change projections
̇ Prevailing wind - direction, speed, anomalies
̇ Relative humidity
̇ Stability conditions and mixing height
Topography ̇ Slope form
̇ Landform and terrain analysis
̇ Specific landform types
Drainage ̇ Surface hydrology
̇ Natural drainage pattern and network
̇ Rainfall runoff relationships
̇ Hydrogeology
̇ Groundwater characteristics – springs, etc.
Soil ̇ Type and characteristics
̇ Porosity and permeability
̇ Sub-soil permeability
̇ Run-off rate
̇ Infiltration capacity
̇ Effective depth (inches/centimeters)
̇ Inherent fertility

Environmental Component Environmental Indicators

̇ Suitability for method of sewage disposal
Geology ̇ Underlying rock type, texture
̇ Surgical material
̇ Geologic structures (faults, shear zones, etc.)
̇ Geologic resources (minerals, etc.)
Water ̇ Raw water availability
̇ Water quality
̇ Surface water (rivers, lakes, ponds, gullies) – quality,
water depths, flooding areas, etc.
̇ Ground water – water table, local aquifer storage
capacity, specific yield, specific retention, water level
depths and fluctuations, etc.
̇ Coastal
̇ Floodplains
̇ Wastewater discharges
̇ Thermal discharges
̇ Waste discharges
Air ̇ Ambient
̇ Respirable
̇ Airshed importance
̇ Odour levels
Noise ̇ Identifying sources of noise
̇ Noise due to traffic/transportation of vehicles
̇ Noise due to heavy equipment operations
̇ Duration and variations in noise over time
Coastal dynamics and ̇ Wave patterns
morphology ̇ Currents
̇ Shoreline morphology – near shore, foreshore
̇ Sediment – characteristics and transport
Biological ̇ Species composition of flora and fauna
̇ Flora – type, density, exploitation, etc.
̇ Fauna – distribution, abundance, rarity, migratory,
species diversity, habitat requirements, habitat resilience,
economic significance, commercial value, etc.
̇ Fisheries – migratory species, species with commercial/
recreational value
Landuse ̇ Landuse pattern, etc.
Guidance for assessment of baseline components and attributes describing sampling

network, sampling frequency, method of measurement is given in Annexure IX.
Infrastructure requirements for EBM
In addition to devising a monitoring network design and monitoring plans/program, it is

also necessary to ensure adequate resources in terms of staffing, skills, equipment,
training, budget, etc., for its implementation. Besides assigning institutional
responsibility, reporting requirements, QA/QC plans and its enforcement capability are
essential. A monitoring program that does not have an infrastructural support and
QA/QC component will have little chance of success.

Defining data statistics/analyses requirements
The data analyses to be conducted are dictated by the objectives of environmental

monitoring program. Statistical methods used to analyze data should be described in
detail prior to data collection. This is important because repetitive observations are
recorded in time and space. Besides, the statistical methods could also be chosen so that
uncertainty or error estimates in the data can be quantified. For e.g., statistical methods
useful in an environmental monitoring program include: 1) frequency distribution
analysis; 2) analysis of variance; 3) analysis of covariance; 4) cluster analysis; 5) multiple
regression analysis; 6) time series analysis; 7) the application of statistical models.
Use of secondary data
The EBM program for EIA can at best address temporal and/or spatial variations limited
to a limited extent because of cost implications and time limitations. Therefore analysis
of all available information or data is essential to establish the regional profiles. So all the
relevant secondary data available for different environmental components should be
collated and analyzed.
To facilitate stakeholders, IL&FS Ecosmart Ltd., has made an attempt to compile the list
of information required for EIA studies and sources of secondary data, which are given in
Annexure XA and Annexure XB.
4.3.3 Impact prediction tools
The scientific and technical credibility of an EIA relies on the ability of EIA practitioners
to estimate the nature, extent, and magnitude of change in environmental components that
may result from project activities. Information about predicted changes is needed for
assigning impact significance, prescribing mitigation measures, and designing &
developing EMPs and monitoring programs. The more accurate the predictions, the more
confident the EIA practitioner will be in prescribing specific measures to eliminate or
minimize the adverse impacts of development project.
Choice of models/methods for impact predictions in respect to air, noise, water, land,
biological and socio-economic environment are tabulated in Annexure XI.
4.3.4 Significance of the impacts
Evaluating the significance of environmental effects is perhaps the most critical

component of impact analysis. The interpretation of significance bears directly on the
subsequent EIA process and also during prior environmental clearance on project
approvals and condition setting. At an early stage, it also enters into screening and
scoping decisions on what level of assessment is required and which impacts and issues
will be addressed.
Impact significance is also a key to choosing among alternatives. In total, the attribution
of significance continues throughout the EIA process, from scoping to EIS review, in a
gradually narrowing “cone of resolution” in which one stage sets up the next. But at this
stage it is the most important as better understanding and quantification of impact
significance is required.

One common approach is based on determination of the significance of predicted changes

in the baseline environmental characteristics and compares these w.r.t regulatory
standards, objective criteria and similar ‘thresholds’ as eco-sensitivity, cultural /religious
values. Often, these are outlined in guidance. A better test proposed by the CEAA
(1995) is to determine if ‘residual’ environmental effects are adverse, significant, and
likely (given under). But at this stage, the practice of formally evaluating significance of
residual impacts, i.e., after predicting the nature and magnitude of impacts based on
before-versus-after-project comparisons, and identifying measures to mitigate these
effects is not being followed in a systematic way.
i. Step 1: Are the environmental effects adverse?
Criteria for determining if effects are “adverse” include:
̇ effects on biota health

̇ effects on rare or endangered species
̇ reductions in species diversity
̇ habitat loss
̇ transformation of natural landscapes
̇ effects on human health
̇ effects on current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by aboriginal
persons
̇ foreclosure of future resource use or production
ii. Step 2: Are the adverse environmental effects significant?
Criteria for determining ‘significance’ are to judge that the impacts:
̇ are extensive over space or time

̇ are intensive in concentration or proportion to assimilative capacity
̇ exceed environmental standards or thresholds
̇ do not comply with environmental policies, landuse plans, sustainability strategy
̇ adversely and seriously affect ecologically sensitive areas
̇ adversely and seriously affect heritage resources, other land uses, community lifestyle
and/or indigenous peoples traditions and values
iii. Step 3: Are the significant adverse environmental effects likely?
Criteria for determining ‘likelihood’ include:
̇ probability of occurrence, and

̇ scientific uncertainty
4.4 Social Impact Assessment
Social Impact Assessment (SIA) is an instrument used to analyze social issues and solicit
stakeholder views for the design of projects. SIA helps in making the project responsive
to social development concerns, including options that enhance benefits for poor and
vulnerable people while mitigating risk and adverse impacts. It analyzes distributional
impacts of intended project benefits on different stakeholder groups, and identifies
differences in assets and capabilities to access the project benefits.

The scope and depth of SIA should be determined by the complexity and importance of
the issues studied, taking into account the skills and resources available. SIA should
include studies related to involuntary resettlement, compulsory land acquisition, impact of
imported workforces, job losses among local people, damage to sites of cultural, historic
or scientific interest, impact on minority or vulnerable groups, child or bonded labour, use
of armed security guards. However, SIA may primarily include the following:
Description of the socio-economic, cultural and institutional profile
Conduct a rapid review of available sources of information to describe the socio-

economic, cultural and institutional interface in which the project operates.
Socio-economic and cultural profile: Describe the most significant social, economic and
cultural features that differentiate social groups in the project area. Describe their
different interests in the project, and their levels of influence. Explain specific effects the
project may have on the poor and underprivileged. Identify any known conflicts among
groups that may affect project implementation.
Institutional profile: Describe the institutional environment; consider both the presence
and function of public, private and civil society institutions relevant to the operation. Are
there important constraints within existing institutions e.g., disconnect between
institutional responsibilities and the interests and behaviors of personnel within those
institutions? Or are there opportunities to utilize the potential of existing institutions, e.g.,
private or civil society institutions, to strengthen implementation capacity.
Legislative and regulatory considerations
To review laws and regulations governing the project’s implementation and access of
poor and excluded groups to goods, services and opportunities provided by the project. In
addition, review the enabling environment for public participation and development
planning. SIA should build on strong aspects of legal and regulatory systems to facilitate
program implementation and identify weak aspects while recommending alternative
arrangements.
Key social issues
SIA provides baseline information for designing the social development strategy. The
analysis should determine the key social and institutional issues which affect the project
objectives; identify the key stakeholder groups in this context and determine how
relationships between stakeholder groups will affect or be affected by the project; and
identify expected social development outcomes and actions proposed to achieve those
outcomes.
Data collection and methodology
Describe the design and methodology for social analysis. In this regard:
̇ Build on existing data;

̇ Clarify the units of analysis for social assessment: intra-household, household level,
as well as communities/settlements and other relevant social aggregations on which
data is available or will be collected for analysis;

̇ Choose appropriate data collection and analytical tools and methods, employing
mixed methods wherever possible; mixed methods include a mix of quantitative and
qualitative methods.
Strategy to achieve social development outcomes
Identify the likely social development outcomes of the project and propose a social
development strategy, including recommendations for institutional arrangements to
achieve them, based on the findings of the social assessment. The social development
strategy could include measures that:
̇ strengthen social inclusion by ensuring that both poor and excluded groups and
intended beneficiaries are included in the benefit stream and in access to opportunities
created by the project
̇ empower stakeholders through their participation in the design and implementation of
the project, their access to information, and their increased voice and accountability
(i.e., a participation framework); and
̇ enhance security by minimizing and managing likely social risks and increasing the
resilience of intended beneficiaries and affected persons to socioeconomic shocks
Implications for analysis of alternatives
Review proposed approaches for the project, and compare them in terms of their relative
impacts and social development outcomes. Consider what implications the findings of
the social assessment might have on those approaches. Should some new components be
added to the approach, or other components be reconsidered or modified?
If SIA and consultation processes indicate that alternative approaches may have better
development outcomes, such alternatives should be described and considered, along with
the likely budgetary and administrative effects these changes might have.
Recommendations for project design and implementation arrangements
Provide guidance to project management and other stakeholders on how to integrate

social development issues into project design and implementation arrangements. As
much as possible, suggest specific action plans or implementation mechanisms to address
relevant social issues and potential impacts. These can be developed as integrated or
separate action plans, for example, as Resettlement Action Plans, Indigenous Peoples
Development Plans, Community Development Plans, etc.
Developing a monitoring plan
Through SIA process, a framework for monitoring and evaluation should be developed.
To the extent possible, this should be done in consultation with key stakeholders,
especially beneficiaries and affected people.
The framework shall identify expected social development indicators, establish

benchmarks, and design systems and mechanisms for measuring progress and results
related to social development objectives. The framework shall identify organizational
responsibilities in terms of monitoring, supervision, and evaluation procedures. Wherever
possible, participatory monitoring mechanisms shall be incorporated. The framework
should establish:

̇ a set of monitoring indicators to track the progress achieved. The benchmarks and
indicators should be limited in number, and should combine both quantitative and
qualitative types of data. The indicators for outputs to be achieved by the social
development strategy should include monitor the process of stakeholder participation,
implementation and institutional reform
̇ indicators to monitor social risk and social development outcomes; and indicators to
monitor impacts of the project’s social development strategy. It is important to
suggest mechanisms through which lessons learnt from monitoring and stakeholder
feedback can result in changes to improve the operation of the project. Indicators
should be of such a nature that results and impacts can be disaggregated by gender
and other relevant social groups
̇ define transparent evaluation procedures. Depending on context, these may include a
combination of methods, such as participant observation, key informant interviews,
focus group discussions, census and socio-economic surveys, gender analysis,
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA)
methodologies, and other tools. Such procedures should be tailored to the special
conditions of the project and to the different groups living in the project area;
Estimate resource and budget requirements for monitoring and evaluation activities,
and a description of other inputs (such as institutional strengthening and capacity
building) needs to be carried out.
4.5 Risk Assessment
Industrial accidents results in great personal and financial loss. Managing these
accidental risks in today’s environment is the concern of every industry including petro-
chemical plants, because either real or perceived incidents can quickly jeopardize the
financial viability of a business. Many facilities involve various manufacturing processes
that have the potential for accidents which may be catastrophic to the plant, work force,
environment, or public.
The main objective of risk assessment study is to propose a comprehensive but simple
approach to carry out risk analysis and conducting feasibility studies for industries,
planning and management of industrial prototype hazard analysis study in Indian context.
Risk analysis and risk assessment should provide details on Quantitative Risk
Assessment (QRA) techniques used world-over to determine risk posed to people who
work inside or live near hazardous facilities, and to aid in preparing effective emergency
response plans by delineating a Disaster Management Plan (DMP) to handle onsite and
offsite emergencies. Hence, QRA is an invaluable method for making informed risk-
based process safety and environmental impact planning decisions, as well as being
fundamental to any decision while siting a facility. QRA whether, site-specific or risk-
specific for any plant is complex and needs extensive study that involves process
understanding, hazard identification, consequence modeling, probability data,
vulnerability models/data, local weather and terrain conditions and local population data.
QRA may be carried out to serve the following objectives;
̇ Identification of safety areas

̇ Identification of hazard sources
̇ Generation of accidental release scenarios for escape of hazardous materials from the
facility
̇ Identification of vulnerable units with recourse to hazard indices

̇ Estimation of damage distances for the accidental release scenarios with recourse to
Maximum Credible Accident (MCA) analysis
̇ Hazard and Operability studies (HAZOP) in order to identify potential failure cases of
significant consequences
̇ Estimation of probability of occurrences of hazardous event through fault tree
analysis and computation of reliability of various control paths
̇ Assessment of risk on basis of above evaluation against the risk acceptability criteria
relevant to the situation
̇ Suggest risk mitigation measures based on engineering judgement, reliability and risk
analysis approaches
̇ Delineation/up-gradation of DMP
̇ Safety Reports: with external safety report/ occupational safety report
The risk assessment report may cover the following in terms of the extent of damage with
resource to MCA analysis and delineation of risk mitigations measures with an approach
to DMP.
̇ Hazard identification – identification of hazardous activities, hazardous materials,

past accident records, etc.
̇ Hazard quantification – consequence analysis to assess the impacts
̇ Risk Presentation
̇ Risk Mitigation Measures
̇ Disaster Management Plans
Figure 4-3: Risk Assessment – Conceptual Framework

Methods of risk prediction should cover all the design intentions and operating
parameters to quantify risk in terms of probability of occurrence of hazardous events and
magnitude of its consequence. Table 4-4 shows the predictive models for risk
assessment.
Table 4-4: Choice of Models for Impact Predictions: Risk Assessment
Name Application Remarks
EFFECT Consequence Analysis for Heat load, press wave &

Visualization of accidental chemical toxic release exposure
release scenarios & its consequence neutral gas dispersion
Consequence Analysis for
WHAZAN Visualization of accidental chemical
release scenarios & its consequence

EGADIS Consequence Analysis for Dense gas dispersion

Visualization of accidental chemical
release scenarios & its consequence
HAZOP and Fault Tree For estimating top event probability Failure frequency data is
Assessment required
Pathways reliability and For estimating reliability of Markov models
protective system hazard equipments and protective systems
analysis
Vulnerability Exposure Estimation of population exposure Uses probit equation for
models population exposure
F-X and F-N curves Individual / Societal risks Graphical Representation

Figure 4-4: Comprehensive Risk Assessment - At a Glance

4-29
4.5.1 Storage and handling of hazardous materials
Both hazardous and non-hazardous materials generated within the project facility shall be
temporarily accommodated in appropriate units placed within the project facility
built/made in line with the safety, health and environmental standards.
The size of these temporary units would depend on the quantity and type of hazardous
waste materials like asbestos, PCB, oils, fuels, etc., with appropriate storage capacities
placed in the project facility in compliance with the Hazardous Waste Management and
Handling Rules. In case of radioactive wastes, storage and handling should be based on
Rules for Management of Radioactive Waste under AERB. Also, if gas cylinders must be
stored in the facility, rules applicable for gas cylinders under the Explosives Act shall be
followed. Later, these materials must be disposed off at a centralized disposal facility
with utmost care following safety norms. Each unit in the facility should be have fire
hydrant system to handle fire hazards.
4.5.2 Hazard identification
Hazard is the characteristic of any system or process which has the potential for accident.
Identification of hazards, in presence of any hazardous waste generating units within the
project facility is of primary significance in the analysis, quantification and cost-effective
control of accidents involving chemicals and process.
Hence, all components of a system/unit need to be thoroughly examined to assess their

potential for initiating or propagating an unplanned event/sequence of events, which can
be termed as an accident.
Typical methods for hazard identification employed are:
̇ Identification of major hazardous units based on Manufacture, Storage and Import of

Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989 of Government of India (as amended in 2000)
̇ Identification of hazardous units and segments of plants and storage units based on
relative ranking technique, viz. Fire-Explosion and Toxicity Index (FE&TI).
Hazardous substances may be classified into three main categories namely flammable,
unstable and toxic substances. Flammable substances require interaction with air for their
hazard to be realized. Under certain circumstances, vapours arising from flammable
substances when mixed with air may become explosive, especially in confined spaces.
However, if present in sufficient quantity, such clouds may explode in open air also.
Unstable substances are liquids or solids, which may decompose with such violence
giving rise to blast waves. Besides, toxic substances are dangerous and cause substantial
damage to life when released into the atmosphere. The ratings for a large number of
chemicals based on flammability, reactivity and toxicity are provided in NFPA Codes 49
and 345 M.
4.5.3 Hazard assessment and evaluation
A preliminary hazard analysis shall be carried out to identify major hazards associated
with storages in the facility. This is followed by consequence analysis to quantify these
hazards. Finally the vulnerable zones are plotted for which risk reducing measures are
deduced and implemented.

Frequent causes of accidents

̇ Fire and explosion: explosives, flammable material
̇ Being struck by falling objects
̇ Caught in/compressed
̇ Snapping of cables, ropes, chains, slings
̇ Handling heavy objects
̇ Electricity (electrocution)
̇ Poor illumination
̇ Falls from height inside industrial units or on the ground
̇ Struck by moving objects
̇ Slipping on wet surfaces
̇ Sharp objects
̇ Oxygen deficiency in confined spaces
̇ Lack of personal protective equipment (PPE), housekeeping practices, safety signs
̇ Hackles, hooks, chains
̇ Cranes, winches, hoisting and hauling equipment;
Hazardous substances and wastes

̇ Heavy and toxic metals (lead, mercury, cadmium, copper, zinc, etc.)
̇ Organometallic substances (tributyltin, etc.)
̇ Lack of hazard communication (storage, labelling, material safety data sheets)
̇ Batteries, fire-fighting liquids
̇ PCBs and PVC (combustion products)
̇ Welding fumes
̇ VOCs (solvents)
̇ Inhalation in confined and enclosed spaces
̇ Physical hazards
̇ Noise
̇ Extreme temperatures
̇ Vibration
̇ Radiation (UV, radioactive materials)
Physical hazards
̇ Noise
̇ Extreme temperatures
̇ Vibration
̇ Radiation (UV, radioactive materials)
Mechanical hazards
̇ Trucks and transport vehicles
̇ Scaffolding, fixed and portable ladders
̇ Impact by tools, sharp-edged tools
̇ Power-driven hand tools, saws, grinders and abrasive cutting wheels
̇ Failure of machinery and equipment
̇ Poor maintenance of machinery and equipment
̇ Lack of safety guards in machines
̇ Structural failure

Biological hazards
̇ Toxic marine organisms (If the project facility is located in Coastal Regions)
̇ Risk of communicable diseases transmitted by pests, vermin, rodents, insects and
other animals that may infest the project facility.
̇ Animal bites
̇ Vectors of infectious diseases (TB, malaria, dengue fever, hepatitis, respiratory
infections, others)
Ergonomic and psychosocial hazards

̇ Repetitive strain injuries, awkward postures, repetitive and monotonous work,
excessive workload
̇ Long working hours, shift work, night work, temporary employment
̇ Mental stress, human relations (aggressive behaviour, alcohol and drug abuse,
violence)
̇ Poverty, low wages, minimum age, lack of education and social environment
General concerns
̇ Lack of safety and health training
̇ Poor work organization
̇ Inadequate housing and sanitation
̇ Inadequate accident prevention and inspection
̇ Inadequate emergency, first-aid and rescue facilities
̇ Lack of medical facilities and social protection
4.5.4 Disaster management plan (DMP)
A disaster is a catastrophic situation in which suddenly, people are plunged into

helplessness and suffering and, as a result, need protection, clothing, shelter, medical &
social care and other necessities of life.
Disaster is an undesirable occurrence of events of such magnitude and nature so as to

adversely affect production and cause damage to environment. Emergency response &
DMP has an important aspect of sound safety management to reduce the probability of
serious loss to people, equipment, material, environment, process, reservoir, etc.
Petrochemical complexes handle s wide variety of hydrocarbons and processes which are
prone to explosion hazard and risk associate may be very serious some times. A DMP
should include risk and hazard, assessment, loss prevention methodology, emergency
response programmes and overall disaster management system.
The risk and hazard analysis stage is a very important part of the risk management
process. Petrochemical complex processes comprise complex processes, which are not
intrinsically safe. Hazard Identification and preventive measures are therefore an integral
part of setting up of any petrochemical complex and its operation to avoid huge losses to
mankind and environment.
The DMP is aimed to ensure safety of life, protection of environment, protection of

installation, restoration of production and salvage operations in this same order of
priorities. For effective implementation of DMP, it should be widely circulated and a
personnel training is to be provided through rehearsals/drills.

To tackle the consequences of a major emergency inside the plant or immediate vicinity
of the plant, a DMP has to be formulated and this planned emergency document is called
DMP.
The objective of the DMP is to make use of the combined resources of the plant and the
outside services to achieve the following:
̇ Effective rescue and medical treatment of casualties

̇ Safeguard other people
̇ Minimize damage to property and the environment
̇ Initially contain and ultimately bring the incident under control
̇ Identify any dead
̇ Provide for the needs of relatives
̇ Provide authoritative information to the news media
̇ Secure the safe rehabilitation of affected area
̇ Preserve relevant records and equipment for the subsequent inquiry into the cause and
circumstances of the emergency
In effect, it is to optimize operational efficiency to rescue rehabilitation and render
medical help and to restore normalcy.
The DMP should include emergency preparedness plan, emergency response team,
emergency communication, emergency responsibilities, emergency facilities, and
emergency actions.
Figure 4-5: Disaster Management Plan
4.5.4.1 Emergency preparedness plan
Incidents, accidents and contingency preparedness should be accounted during

construction and operation process. This shall be a part of EMS. Emergency
Preparedness Plan (EPP) should be prepared following the National Environmental
Emergency Plan and OSHA guidelines. According to these guidelines, an environmental
emergency plan would essentially provide the following information:
̇ Assignment of duties and responsibilities among the authorities, participating

agencies, response team, their coordinators and/or those responsible for the pollution
incident

̇ Relationship with other emergency plans

̇ A reporting system that ensures rapid notification in the event of a pollution incident
̇ The establishment of a focal point for coordination and directions connected to the
implementation of the plan
̇ Response operations should always cover these four phases:
− Discovery and alarm
− Evaluation, notification and plan invocation
− Containment and counter measures
− Cleanup and disposal
̇ Identification of expertise and response resources available for assistance for the
implementation of plan
̇ Directions on the necessary emergency provisions applicable to the handling,
treatment or disposal of certain pollutants
̇ Link to the local community for assistance, if necessary
̇ Support measures, such as procedures for providing public information, carrying out
surveillance, issuing post-incident reports, review and updating of the plan, and
periodic exercising of the plan.
4.5.4.2 Emergency response
Various units within the project facility are always subjected to accidents and incidents of
many a kind. Therefore, a survey of potential incidents and accidents is to be carried out.
Based on this, a plan for response to incidents, injuries and emergencies should be
prepared. Response to emergencies should ensure that:
̇ The exposure of workers should be limited as much as possible during the operation
̇ Contaminated areas should be cleaned and, if necessary disinfected
̇ Limited impact on the environment at the extent possible.
Written procedures for different types of emergencies should be prepared and the entire
workforce should be trained in emergency response. All relevant emergency response
equipment should also be readily available.
With regard to dangerous spills, associated cleanup and firefighting operations should be
carried out by specially allocated and trained personnel.
4.5.4.3 Response team
It is important to setup an Emergency Organization. A senior executive who has control

over the affairs of the plant would be heading the Emergency Organization. He would be
designated at Site Controller. Manager (Safety) would be designated as the Incident
Controller. In case of stores, utilities, open areas, which are not under control of the
Production Heads, Senior Executive responsible for maintenance of utilities would be
designated as Incident Controller. All the Incident Controllers would be reporting to the
Site Controller.

Each Incident Controller organizes a team responsible for controlling the incidence with
the personnel under his control. Shift in charge would be the reporting officer, who
would bring the incidence to the notice of the Incidence Controller and Site Controller.
Emergency Coordinators would be appointed who would undertake the responsibilities

like firefighting, rescue, rehabilitation, transport and provide essential & support services.
For this purposes, Security In charge, Personnel Department, Essential services personnel
would be engaged. All these personnel would be designated as key personnel.
In each shift, electrical supervisor, electrical fitters, pump house in charge, and other
maintenance staff would be drafted for emergency operations. In the event of power or
communication system failure, some of staff members in the office/facility would be
drafted and their services would be utilized as messengers for quick passing of
communications. All these personnel would be declared as essential personnel.
4.5.4.4 Response to injuries
Based on a survey of possible injuries, a procedure for response to injuries or exposure to

hazardous substances should be established. All staff should have minimum training to
such response and the procedure ought to include the following:
̇ Immediate first aid, such as eye splashing, cleansing of wounds and skin, and
bandaging
̇ Immediate reporting to a responsible designated person
̇ If possible, retention of the item and details of its source for identification of possible
hazards
̇ Rapid additional medical care from medical personnel
̇ Medical surveillance
̇ Recording of the incident
̇ Investigation, determination and implementation of remedial action
It is vital that incident reporting should be straightforward so that reporting is actually
carried out.
4.5.4.5 Emergency communication
Whoever notices an emergency situation such as fire, growth of fire, leakage, etc. would
inform his immediate superior and Emergency Control Center. The person on duty in the
Emergency Control Center, would appraise the Site Controller. Site Controller verifies
the situation from the Incident Controller of that area or the Shift In charge and takes a
decision about an impending On-site Emergency. This would be communicated to all the
Incident Controllers, Emergency Coordinators. Simultaneously, the emergency warning
system would be activated on the instructions of the Site Controller.
4.5.4.6 Emergency responsibilities
The responsibilities of the key personnel should be defined for the following:

̇ Site controller
̇ Incident controller
̇ Emergency coordinator - rescue, fire fighting
̇ Emergency coordinator-medical, mutual aid, rehabilitation, transport and
communication
̇ Emergency coordinator - essential services
̇ Employers responsibility
4.5.4.7 Emergency facilities
̇ Emergency Control Center – with access to important personnel, telephone, fax, telex
facility, safe contained breathing apparatus, hand tools, emergency shut down
procedures, duties and contact details of key personnel and government agencies,
emergency equipments, etc.
̇ Assembly Point – with minimum facilities for safety and rescue
̇ Emergency Power Supply – connected with diesel generator, flame proof emergency
lamps, etc.
̇ Fire Fighting Facilities – first aid fire fighting equipments, fire alarms, etc.
̇ Location of wind Stock – located at appropriate location to indicate the direction of
wind for emergency escape
̇ Emergency Medical Facilities – Stretchers, gas masks, general first aid, emergency
control room, breathing apparatus, other emergency medical equipment, ambulance
4.5.4.8 Emergency actions
̇ Emergency warning
̇ Evacuation of personnel
̇ All clear signal
̇ Public information and warning
̇ Coordination with local authorities
̇ Mutual aid
̇ Mock drills
4.6 Mitigation Measures
The purpose of mitigation is to identify measures that safeguard the environment and the
community affected by the proposal. Mitigation is both a creative and practical phase of
the EIA process. It seeks to find the best ways and means of avoiding, minimizing and
remedying impacts. Mitigation measures must be translated into action in right way and
at the right time, if they are to be successful. This process is referred to as impact
management and takes place during project implementation. A written plan should be
prepared for this purpose, and should include a schedule of agreed actions. Opportunities
for impact mitigation will occur throughout the project cycle.
4.6.1 Important considerations for mitigation methods
The responsibility of project proponents to ‘internalize’ the full environmental costs of

development proposals is now widely accepted under “Polluter Pay” principle. In
addition, many proponents have found that good design and impact management can

result in significant savings applying the principles of cleaner production to improve their
environmental performance.
̇ The predicted adverse environmental as well as social impacts for which mitigation
measures are required should be identified and briefly summarized along with cross
referencing them to the significance, prediction components of the EIA report or
other documentation.
̇ Each mitigation measure should be briefly described w.r.t the impact of significances
to which it relates and the conditions under which it is required (for example,
continuously or in the event of contingencies). These should also be cross-referenced
to the project design and operating procedures which elaborate on the technical
aspects of implementing the various measures.
̇ Cost and responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring should be clearly defined,
including arrangements for coordination among various Authorities responsible for
mitigation.
̇ The proponent can use the EMP to develop environmental performance standards and
requirements for the project site as well as supply chain. An EMP can be
implemented through EMS for the operational phase of the project.
Prior to selecting mitigation plans it is appropriate to study the mitigation alternatives for
cost-effectiveness, technical and socio-political feasibility. Such mitigation measures
could include:
̇ avoiding sensitive areas such as eco-sensitive area e.g., fish spawning areas, dense
mangrove areas or areas known to contain rare or endangered species
̇ adjusting work schedules to minimize disturbance
̇ engineered structures such as berms and noise attenuation barriers
̇ pollution control devices such as scrubbers and electrostatic precipitators
̇ changes in fuel feed, manufacturing, process, technology use, or waste management
practices, etc.
4.6.2 Hierarchy of elements of mitigation plan
Figure 4-6: Elements of Mitigation

A good EIA practice requires technical understanding of relevant issues and the measures
that work in such given circumstances: The priority of selection of mitigation measures
should be in the order:
Step One: Impact avoidance
This step is most effective when applied at an early stage of project planning. It can be
achieved by:
̇ not undertaking certain projects or elements that could result in adverse impacts
̇ avoiding areas that are environmentally sensitive
̇ putting in place the preventative measures to stop adverse impacts from occurring, for
example, release of water from a reservoir to maintain a fisheries regime
Step Two: Impact minimization
This step is usually taken during impact identification and prediction to limit or reduce
the degree, extent, magnitude, or duration of adverse impacts. It can be achieved by:
̇ scaling down or relocating the proposal

̇ redesigning elements of the project
̇ taking supplementary measures to manage the impacts
Step Three: Impact compensation
This step is usually applied to remedy unavoidable residual adverse impacts. It can be
achieved by:
̇ rehabilitation of the affected site or environment, for example, by habitat

enhancement and restocking fish
̇ restoration of the affected site or environment to its previous state or better, as
typically required for mine sites, forestry roads and seismic lines
̇ replacement of the same resource values at another location. For example, by
wetland engineering to provide an equivalent area to that lost to drainage or infill
Important compensation elements
Resettlement Plans: Special considerations apply to mitigation of proposals that displace

or disrupt people. Certain types of projects, such as reservoirs and irrigation schemes and
public works, are known to cause involuntary resettlement. This is a contentious issue
because it involves far more than re-housing people; in addition, income sources and
access to common property resources are likely to be lost. Almost certainly, a
resettlement plan will be required to ensure that no one is worse off than before, which
may not be possible for indigenous people whose culture and lifestyle is tied to a locality.
This plan must include the means for those displaced to reconstruct their economies and
communities and should include an EIA of the receiving areas. Particular attention
should be given to indigenous, minority and vulnerable groups who are at higher risk
from resettlement.

In-kind compensation
When significant or net residual loss or damage to the environment is likely, in kind
compensation is appropriate. As noted earlier, environmental rehabilitation, restoration or
replacement have become standard practices for many proponents. Now, increasing
emphasis is given to a broader range of compensation measures to offset impacts and
assure the sustainability of development proposals. These include impact compensation
‘trading’, such as offsetting CO2 emissions by planting forests to sequester carbon.
4.6.3 Typical mitigation measures
Choice of location for the developmental activity plays an important role in preventing
the adverse impacts on surrounding environment. Detailed guidelines on siting of
industries are provided in Section 4.2. However, if the developmental activity produces
any more adverse impacts, mitigation measures should be taken.
Previous subsections of the Section 4.6 could be precisely summarized into following:
̇ Impacts from a developmental project could have many dimensions. As most of the
direct impacts are caused by releases from developmental projects, often control at
source is the best opportunity to either eliminate or mitigate the impacts, in case these
are cost-effective. In other words, the best way to mitigate impacts is to prevent them
from occurring. Choice of raw materials/technologies/processes which produce least
impact would be one of the options to achieve it.
̇ After exploring cost-effective feasible alternatives to control impacts at source,
various interventions to minimize adverse impacts may be considered. These
interventions, primarily aim at reducing the residual impacts on VECs of the
receiving environment to acceptable concentrations.
̇ Degree of control at source and external interventions differs from situation-to -
situation and is largely governed by techno-economic feasibility. While the
regulatory bodies stress for further source control (due to high reliability), the project
proponents bargain for other interventions which may be relatively cost-effective than
further control at source (in any case, project authority is required to meet the
industry-specific standards by adopting the best practicable technologies. However,
if the location demands further control at source, then the proponents are required to
adopt further advanced control technologies, i.e., towards best available control
technologies). After having discussions with the project proponent, EAC reaches to
an agreed level of source control+other interventions (together called as mitigation
measures in the given context) that achieve the targeted protection levels for VECs in
the receiving environment. These levels will become the principal clearance
conditions.
̇ Chapter 3 of this TGM offers elaborate information on cleaner technologies, waste
minimization opportunities, and control technologies for various kinds of polluting
parameters that emanate from this developmental activity. This information may be
used to draw appropriate control measures applicable at source.
The choice of interventions for mitigation of impacts may also be numerous and depend
on various factors. Mitigation measures based on location-specific suitability and some
other factors are discussed in sub-sections 4.6.1 and 4.6.2. A few typical measures which
may also be explored for mitigation of impacts are listed in Table 4-5.

Table 4-5: Typical Mitigation Measures
Impacts Typical Mitigation Measures
Soil ̇ Windscreens, maintenance, and installation of ground cover

̇ Installation of drainage ditches
̇ Runoff and retention ponds
̇ Minimize disturbances and scarification of the surface
̇ Usage of appropriate monitoring and control facilities for construction
equipments deployed
̇ Methods to reuse earth material generated during excavation
Resources – ̇ Availing the resources which could be replenished by natural systems,
fuel/construction etc.
material, etc.
Deforestation ̇ Plant or create similar areas
̇ Initiate a tree planning program in other areas
̇ Donate land to conservationalist groups
Water pollution ̇ Conjunctive use of ground/surface water, to prevent flooding/water
(Ground water/ logging/depletion of water resources. Included are land use pattern,
Surface water) land filling, lagoon/reservoir/garland canal construction, and rainwater
harvesting and pumping rate.
̇ Stormwater drainage system to collect surface runoff
̇ Minimise flow variation from the mean flow
̇ Storing of oil wastes in lagoons should be minimised in order to avoid
possible contamination of the ground water system.
̇ All effluents containing acid/alkali/organic/toxic wastes should be
properly treated.
̇ Monitoring of ground waters
̇ Use of biodegradable or otherwise readily treatable additives
̇ Neutralization and sedimentation of wastewaters, where applicable
̇ Dewatering of sludge and appropriate disposal of solids
̇ In case of oil waste, oil separation before treatment and discharge into
the environment
̇ By controlling discharge of sanitary sewage and industrial waste into
the environment
̇ By avoiding the activities that increases erosion or that contributes
nutrients to water (thus stimulating alga growth)
̇ For wastes containing high TDS, treatment methods include removal
of liquid and disposal of residue by controlled landfilling to avoid any
possible leaching of the fills
̇ All surface runoffs around mines or quarries should be collected
treated and disposed.
̇ Treated wastewater (such as sewage, industrial wastes, or stored
surface runoffs) can be used as cooling water makeup.
̇ Wastewater carrying radioactive elements should be treated separately
by means of de-watering procedures, and solids or brine should be
disposed of with special care.
̇ Develop spill prevention plans in case of chemical discharges and
spills
̇ Develop traps and containment system and chemically treat discharges
on site
Air Pollution ̇ Periodic checking of vehicles and construction machinery to ensure
compliance to emission standards
̇ Attenuation of pollution/protection of receptor through green
belts/green cover


̇ Dilution of odourant (dilution can change the nature as well as strength
of an odour), odour counteraction or neutralise (certain pairs of odours
in appropriate concentrations may neutralise each other), odour
masking or blanketing (certain weaker malodours may be suppressed
by a considerably stronger good odour).
̇ Regular monitoring of air polluting concentrations
Dust pollution ̇ Adopt sprinkling of water
̇ Wetting of roadways to reduce traffic dust and reentrained particles
̇ Control vehicle speed on sight
̇ Ensure priodical wahsing of construction equipment and transport
vehicles to prevent accumulated dust
̇ Ensure that vehicles should be covered during transportation
̇ Installation of windscreens to breakup the wind flow
̇ Burning of refuse on days when meteorological conditions provide for
good mixing and dispersion
̇ Providing dust collection equipment at all possible points
̇ Maintaining dust levels within permissible limits
̇ Provision for masks when dust level exceeds
Noise pollution ̇ Use of suitable muffler systems/enclosures/sound-proof glass
panelling on heavy equipment/pumps/blowers
̇ Pumps and blowers may be mounted on rubber pads or any other noise
absorbing materials
̇ Limiting certain activities
̇ Proper scheduling of high noise generating activities to minimise noise
impacts
̇ Usage of well maintained construction equipment meeting the
regulatory standards
̇ Placement of equipments emitting high noise in an orientation that
directs the noise away from sensitive receptors
̇ Periodic maintenance of equipments/repalcing whenever necessary/
lubrication of rotating parts, etc.
̇ By using damping, absorption, dissipation, and deflection methods
̇ By using common techniques such as constructing sound enclosures,
applying mufflers, mounting noise sources on isolators, and/or using
materials with damping properties
̇ Performance specifications for noise represent a way to insure the
procured item is controlled
̇ Use of ear protective devices.
̇ In case of steady noise levels above 85-dB (A), initiation of hearing
conservation measures
̇ Implementation of greenbelt for noise attentuation may be taken up
Biological ̇ Installation of systems to discourage nesting or perching of birds in
dangerous environments
̇ Increased employee awareness to sensitive areas
Social ̇ Health and safety measures for workers
̇ Development of traffic plan that minimizes road use by workers
̇ Upgrade of roads and intersections
̇ Provide suffiecient counselling and time to the affected population for
relocation
̇ Discuss and finalize alternate arrangements and associated
infrastructure in places of religious importance
̇ Exploration of alternative approach routes in consultation with local
community and other stakeholders


̇ Provision of alternate jobs in unskilled and skilled categories
Marine ̇ Water quality monitoring program
̇ Limit construction activities to day time to provide recuperation time
at night and reduce turbidity
̇ Prevention of spillage of diesel, oil, lubes, etc.
̇ Usage of appropriate system to barges/workboats for collection of
liquid/solid waste generated onboard
̇ Avoid discharge of construction/dredging waste (lose silt) into sea. It
may be disposed at the identified disposal point.
̇ Ensure usage of suitable/proper equipment for dredging in order to
minimize the turbidity and suspensions at the dredging site.
̇ Checking with the complainace conditions before discharging wastes
into the sea water
̇ Have a post-dregding monitoring programme in place
̇ Take up periodic maintenance dredging including inspectionof sub-sea
conditions, etc.
Occupational ̇ Provision of worker camps with proper santiation and medical
health and safety facilities, as well as making the worker camps self- sufficient with
resources like water supply, power supply, etc
̇ Arrangement of periodic health check-ups for early detection and
control of communicable diseases.
̇ Arrangement to dispose off the wastes at approved disposal sites.
̇ Provide preventive measures for potentital fire hazards with requisite
fire detection, fire-fighting facilities and adequate water storage
Construction ̇ Have a Transport Management Plan in place in order to prevent/
minimize the disturbance on surrounding habitats
̇ Initiate traffic density studies
Solid/Hazardous ̇ Proper handling of excavated soil
waste ̇ Proper plan to collect and dispose off the solid waste generated onsite.
̇ Identify an authorized waste handler for segregation of construction
and hazardous waste and its removal on a regular basis to minimise
odour, pest and litter impacts
̇ Prohibit burning of refuse onsite.
4.7 Environmental Management Plan
A typical EMP shall be composed of the following:
1. summary of potential impacts of the proposal

2. description of recommended mitigation measures
3. description of monitoring programme to ensure compliance with relevant standards
and residual impacts
4. allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation
5. implementation schedule and reporting procedures
6. contingency plan when impacts are greater than expected

Summary of impacts: The predicted adverse environmental and social impacts for which
mitigation measures are identified in earlier sections to be briefly summarized with cross
referencing to the corresponding sections in EIA report.
Description of mitigation measures: Each mitigation measure should be briefly

described w.r.t the impact to which it relates and the conditions under which it is required.
These should be accompanied by/referenced to, project design and operating procedures
which elaborate on the technical aspects of implementing various measures.
Description of monitoring programme to ensure compliance with relevant standards

and residual impacts: Environmental monitoring refers to compliance monitoring and
residual impact monitoring. Compliance monitoring refers to meeting the industry-
specific statutory compliance requirements (Ref. Applicable National regulations as
detailed in Chapter 3).
Residual impact monitoring refers to monitoring of identified sensitive locations with

adequate number of samples and frequency. The monitoring programme should clearly
indicate the linkages between impacts identified in the EIA report, measurement
indicators, detection limits (where appropriate), and definition of thresholds that signal
the need for corrective actions.
Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation: These should be

specified for both the initial investment and recurring expenses for implementing all
measures contained in the EMP, integrated into the total project costs, and factored into
loan negotiation.
The EMP should contain commitments that are binding on the proponent in different
phases of project implementation i.e., pre-construction or site clearance, construction,
operation, decommissioning.
Responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring should be clearly defined, including

arrangements for coordination between various factors responsible for mitigation. Details
should be provided w.r.t deployment of staff (detailed organogram), monitoring network
design, parameters to be monitored, analysis methods, associated equipments, etc.
Implementation schedule and reporting procedures: The timing, frequency and

duration of mitigation measure should be specified in an implementation schedule,
showing links with overall project implementation. Procedures to provide information on
the progress and results of mitigation and monitoring measures should also be clearly
specified.
Contingency Plan when the impacts are greater than expected: There shall be a
contingency plan for attending the situations where the residual impacts are higher than
expected. It is an imperative requirement for all project Authorities to plan additional
programmes to deal with the situation, after duly intimating the concerned local
regulatory bodies.
4.8 Reporting
Structure of the EIA report (Appendix III of the EIA Notification) applicable for petro-
chemical industry is given in the Table 4-6. Each task prescribed in ToR shall be
incorporated appropriately in the contents in addition to the contents described in the
table.

Table 4-6: Structure of EIA Report
S.No EIA Structure Contents

1. Introduction ̇ Purpose of the report
̇ Identification of project & project proponent
̇ Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and
its importance to the country, region
̇ Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out
(As per Terms of Reference)
2. Project Description Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on
project feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects.
Details should be provided to give clear picture of the following:
̇ Type of project
̇ Need for the project
̇ Location (maps showing general location, specific location,
project boundary & project site layout)
̇ Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities
required by or for the project)
̇ Proposed schedule for approval and implementation
̇ Technology and process description
̇ Project description including drawings showing project
layout, components of project etc. Schematic
representations of the feasibility drawings which give
information important for EIA purpose
̇ Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the
project to meet environmental standards, environmental
operating conditions, or other EIA requirements (as required
by the scope)
̇ Assessment of new & untested technology for the risk of
technological failure
3. Description of the ̇ Study area, period, components & methodology
Environment ̇ Establishment of baseline for VECs, as identified in the
scope
̇ Base maps of all environmental components
4. Anticipated ̇ Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to project
Environmental location, possible accidents, project design, project
Impacts & construction, regular operations, final decommissioning or
Mitigation Measures rehabilitation of a completed project
̇ Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts
identified
̇ Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental
components
̇ Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for
determining significance, Assigning significance)
̇ Mitigation measures
5. Analysis of ̇ Incase, the scoping exercise results in need for alternatives:
Alternatives ̇ Description of each alternative
(Technology & Site) ̇ Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative
̇ Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and
selection of alternative
6. Environmental ̇ Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of
Monitoring Program mitigation measures (incl. measurement methodologies,
frequency, location, data analysis, reporting schedules,
emergency procedures, detailed budget & procurement
schedules)

S.No EIA Structure Contents

7. Additional Studies ̇ Public consultation
̇ Risk assessment
̇ Social impact assessment, R&R action plans
8. Project Benefits ̇ Improvements in the physical infrastructure
̇ Improvements in the social infrastructure
̇ Employment potential –skilled; semi-skilled and unskilled
̇ Other tangible benefits
9. Environmental Cost ̇ If recommended at the scoping stage
Benefit Analysis
10. EMP ̇ Description of the administrative aspects that ensures proper
implementation of mitigative measures and their
effectiveness monitored, after approval of the EIA
11. Summary & ̇ Overall justification for implementation of the project
Conclusion (This ̇ Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated
will constitute the
summary of the EIA
Report)
12. Disclosure of ̇ Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume
Consultants engaged and nature of Consultancy rendered
4.9 Public Consultation
Public consultation refers to the process by which the concerns of local affected people
and others who have plausible stake in the environmental impacts of the project or
activity are ascertained.
̇ Public consultation is not a decision taking process, but is a process to collect views
of the people having plausible stake. If the SPCB/Public agency conducting public
hearing is not convinced with the plausible stake, then such expressed views need not
be considered.
̇ Public consultation involves two components, one is public hearing, and other one is
inviting written responses/objections through Internet/by post, etc., by placing the
summary of EIA report on the web site.
̇ All Category A and Category B1 projects require public hearing except the following:
− Once prior environmental clearance is granted to an industrial estates/SEZs/EPZs
etc., for a given composition (type and capacity) of industries, then individual
units will not require public hearing
− Expansion of roads and highways, which do not involve any further acquisition of
land
− Maintenance dredging provided the dredged material shall be disposed within
port limits
− All building/construction projects/area development projects/townships
− All Category B2 projects
− All projects concerning national defense and security or involving other strategic
considerations as determined by the Central Government
̇ Public hearing shall be carried out at the site or in its close proximity, district-wise,
for ascertaining concerns of local affected people.

̇ Project proponent shall make a request through a simple letter to the

Member Secretary of the SPCB/UTPCC to arrange public hearing.
̇ Project proponent shall enclose with the letter of request, at least 10 hard copies and
10 soft copies of the draft EIA report including the summary EIA report in English
and in official language of the State/local language prepared as per the approved
scope of work, to the concerned Authority.
̇ Simultaneously, project proponent shall arrange to send, one hard copy and one soft
copy, of the above draft EIA report along with the summary EIA report to the
following Authorities within whose jurisdiction the project will be located:
− District magistrate/District Collector/Deputy Commissioner (s)
− Zilla parishad and municipal corporation or panchayats union
− District industries office
− Urban local bodies (ULBs)/PRIs concerned/development authorities
− Concerned regional office of the MoEF/SPCB
̇ Above mentioned Authorities except regional office of MoEF shall arrange to widely
publicize the draft EIA report within their respective jurisdictions requesting the
interested persons to send their comments to the concerned regulatory Authorities.
They shall also make draft EIA report for inspection electronically or otherwise to the
public during normal office hours till the public hearing is over.
̇ Concerned regulatory Authority (MoEF) shall display the summary of EIA report on
its website and also make full draft EIA report available for reference at a notified
place during normal office hours at their head office.
̇ SPCB or UTPCC concerned shall also make similar arrangements for giving publicity
about the project within the State/UT and make available the summary of draft EIA
report for inspection in select offices, public libraries or any other suitable location,
etc. They shall also additionally make available a copy of the draft EIA report to the
above five authorities/offices as mentioned above.
̇ The Member Secretary of the concerned SPCB or UTPCC shall finalize the date,
time and exact venue for the conduct of public hearing within seven days of the date
of the receipt of the draft EIA report from the project proponent and advertise the
same in one major National Daily and one Regional vernacular Daily/official State
language.
̇ A minimum notice period of 30 (thirty) days shall be provided to the public for
furnishing their responses.
̇ No postponement of the date, time, venue of the public hearing shall be undertaken,
unless some untoward emergency situation occurs. Only incase of emergencies and
up on recommendation of the concerned District Magistrate/District Collector/Deputy
Commissioner, the postponement shall be notified to the public through the same
National and Regional vernacular dailies and also prominently displayed at all the
identified offices by the concerned SPCB/UTPCC
̇ In the above exceptional circumstances fresh date, time and venue for the public
consultation shall be decided by the Member–Secretary of the concerned SPCB/
UTPCC only in consultation with the District Magistrate/District Collector/Deputy
Commissioner and notified afresh as per the procedure.
̇ The District Magistrate/District Collector/Deputy Commissioner or his or her
representative not below the rank of an Additional District Magistrate assisted by a
representative of SPCB or UTPCC, shall supervise and preside over the entire public
hearing process.

̇ The SPCB/UTPCC shall arrange to video film the entire proceedings. A copy of the
videotape or a CD shall be enclosed with the public hearing proceedings while
forwarding it to the Regulatory Authority concerned.
̇ The attendance of all those who are present at the venue shall be noted and annexed
with the final proceedings
̇ There shall be no quorum required for attendance for starting the proceedings
̇ Persons present at the venue shall be granted the opportunity to seek information or
clarifications on the project from the proponent. The summary of the public hearing
proceedings accurately reflecting all the views and concerns expressed shall be
recorded by the representative of the SPCB/UTPCC and read over to the audience at
the end of the proceedings explaining the contents in the local/vernacular language
and the agreed minutes shall be signed by the District Magistrate/District Collector/
Deputy Commissioner or his or her representative on the same day and forwarded to
the SPCB/UTPCC concerned.
̇ A statement of the issues raised by the public and the comments of the proponent
shall also be prepared in the local language or the official State language, as the case
may be and in English and annexed to the proceedings.
̇ The proceedings of the public hearing shall be conspicuously displayed at the office
of the Panchayats within whose jurisdiction the project is located, office of the
concerned Zilla Parishad, District Magistrate/District Collector/Deputy
Commissioner, and the SPCB or UTPCC. The SPCB/ UTPCC shall also display the
proceedings on its website for general information. Comments, if any, on the
proceedings, may be sent directly to the concerned regulatory authorities and the
Applicant concerned.
̇ The public hearing shall be completed within a period of 45 (forty five) days from
date of receipt of the request letter from the Applicant. Therefore the SPCB or
UTPCC concerned shall send public hearing proceedings to the concerned regulatory
authority within eight days of the completion of the public hearing. Simultaneously,
a copy will also be provided to the project proponent. The proponent may also
directly forward a copy of the approved public hearing proceedings to the regulatory
authority concerned along with the final EIA report or supplementary report to the
draft EIA report prepared after the public hearing and public consultations
incorporating the concerns expressed in the public hearing along with action plan and
financial allocation, item-wise, to address those concerns.
̇ Upon receipt of the same, the Authority will place executive summary of the report
on the website to invite responses from other concerned persons having a plausible
stake in the environmental aspects of the project or activity.
̇ If SPCB/UTPCC is unable to conduct public hearing in the prescribed time, the
Central Government incase of Category A projects at the request of the SEIAA may
engage any other agency or Authority for conducting the public hearing process
within a further period of 45 days. The Government shall pay the appropriate fee to
the public agency for conducting public hearing.
̇ A public agency means a non-profit making institution/ body such as
technical/academic institutions, government bodies not subordinate to the concerned
Authority.
̇ If SPCB/Public Agency authorized for conducting public hearing informs the
Authority, stating that it is not possible to conduct the public hearing in a manner,
which will enable the views of the concerned local persons to be freely expressed,

then Authority may consider such report to take a decision that in such particular
case, public consultation may not have the component of public hearing.
̇ Often restricting the public hearing to the specific district may not serve the entire
purpose, therefore, NGOs who are local and registered under the Societies Act in the
adjacent districts may also be allowed to participate in public hearing, if they so
desire.
̇ Confidential information including non-disclosable or legally privileged information
involving intellectual property right, source specified in the application shall not be
placed on the website.
̇ The Authority shall make available on a written request from any concerned person
the draft EIA report for inspection at a notified place during normal office hours till
the date of the public hearing.
̇ While mandatory requirements will have to be adhered to, utmost attention shall be
given to the issues raised in the public hearing for determining the modifications
needed in the project proposal and the EMP to address such issues.
̇ Final EIA report after making needed amendments, as aforesaid, shall be submitted
by the applicant to the concerned Authority for prior environmental clearance.
Alternatively, a supplementary report to draft EIA and EMP addressing all concerns
expressed during the public consultation may be submitted.
4.10 Appraisal
Appraisal means the detailed scrutiny by the EAC of the application and the other
documents like the final EIA report, outcome of the public consultation including public
hearing proceedings submitted by the applicant for grant of prior environmental
clearance.
̇ The appraisal shall be made by EAC to the Central Government.

̇ Project proponent either personally or through consultant can make a presentation to
the EAC for the purpose of appraising the features of the project proposal and also to
clarify the issues raised by the members of the EAC.
̇ On completion of these proceedings, EAC shall make categorical recommendations
to the respective Authority, either for grant of prior environmental clearance on
stipulated terms & conditions, if any, or rejection of the application with reasons.
̇ In case EAC needs to visit the site or obtain further information before being able to
make categorical recommendations, EAC may inform the project proponent
accordingly. In such an event, it should be ensured that the process of prior
environmental clearance is not unduly delayed to go beyond the prescribed
timeframe.
̇ Up on the scrutiny of the final report, if EAC opines that ToR finalized at the scoping
stage are covered by the proponent, then the project proponent may be asked to
provide such information. If such information is declined by the project proponent or
is unlikely to be provided early enough so as to complete the environmental appraisal
within prescribed time of 60 days, the EAC may recommend for rejection of the
proposal with the same reason.
̇ Appraisal shall be strictly in terms of ToR finalized at the scoping stage and the
concerns expressed during public consultation.

̇ This process of appraisal shall be completed within 60 days from the receipt of the
updated EIA and EMP reports, after completing public consultation.
̇ The EIA report will be typically examined for following:
– Project site description supported by topographic maps & photographs – detailed
description of topography, land use and activities at the proposed project site and
its surroundings (buffer zone) supported by photographic evidence.
– Clarity in description of drainage pattern, location of eco-sensitive areas,
vegetation characteristics, wildlife status - highlighting significant environmental
attributes such as feeding, breeding and nesting grounds of wildlife species,
migratory corridor, wetland, erosion and neighboring issues.
– Description of the project site – how well the interfaces between the project
related activities and the environment have been identified for the entire project
cycle i.e., construction, operation and decommissioning at the end of the project
life.
– If it is envisaged that the project is to be closed after a specified period in case of
mining projects, the interface at the closure stage also needs to be described.
– How complete and authentic are the baseline data pertaining to flora and fauna
and socio economic aspects?
– Citing of proper references, with regard to the source(s) of baseline data as well
as the name of the investigators/ investigating agency responsible for collecting
the primary data.
– How consistent are the various values of environmental parameters with respect
to each other?
– Is a reasonable assessment of the environmental and social impact made for the
identified environmental issues including project affected people?
– To what extent the proposed environmental plan will mitigate the environmental
impact and at what estimated cost, shown separately for construction, operation
and closure stages and also separately in terms of capital and recurring expenses
along with details of agencies that will be responsible for the implementation of
environmental plan/ conservation plan.
– How well the concerns expressed/highlighted during public hearing have been
addressed and incorporated in the EMP giving item wise financial provisions and
commitments (in quantified terms)?
– How far the proposed environmental monitoring plan will effectively evaluate the
performance of EMP? Are details for environmental monitoring plan provided in
the same manner as the EMP?
– Identification of hazard and quantification of risk assessment and whether
appropriate mitigation plan has been included in the EMP?
– Does the proposal include a well formulated time bound green belt development
plan for mitigating environmental problems such as fugitive emission of dust,
gaseous pollutants, noise, odour, etc.
– Does EIA make a serious attempt to guide the project proponent for minimizing
the requirement of natural resources including land, water energy and other non
renewable resources?
– How well has the EIA statement been organized and presented so that the issues,
their impact and environmental management strategies emerge clearly from it and

how well organized was the power point presentation made before the expert
committee?
– Is the information presented in the EIA adequately and appropriately supported
by maps, imageries and photographs highlighting site features and environmental
attributes?
4.11 Decision Making
The Chairperson reads the sense of the Committee and finalizes the draft minutes of the
meeting, which are circulated by the Secretary to all expert members invited to the
meeting. Based on the response from the members, the minutes are finalized and signed
by the Chairperson. This process for finalization of the minutes should be so organized
that the time prescribed for various stages is not exceeded.
Approval / Rejection / Reconsideration
̇ The Authority shall consider the recommendations of concerned appraisal Committee

and convey its decision within 45 days of the receipt of recommendations.
̇ If the Authority disagrees with the recommendations of the Appraisal Committee,
then reasons shall be communicated to concerned Appraisal Committee and applicant
within 45 days from the receipt of the recommendations. The Appraisal Committee
concerned shall consider the observations of the Authority and furnish its views on
the observations within further period of 60 days. The Authority shall take a
decision within the next 30 days based on the views of appraisal Committee.
̇ If the decision of the Authority is not conveyed within the time, then the proponent
may proceed as if the prior environmental clearance sought has been granted or
denied by the regulatory authority in terms of the final recommendation of the
concerned appraisal Committee. For this purpose, the decision of the Appraisal
Committee will be public document, once the period specified above for taking the
decision by the Authority is over.
̇ Deliberate concealment and/or submission of false or misleading information or data
which is material to screening or scoping or appraisal or decision on the application
shall make the application liable for rejection, and cancellation of prior environmental
clearance granted on that basis. Rejection of an application or cancellation of a prior
environmental clearance already granted, on such ground, shall be decided by the
regulatory authority, after giving a personal hearing to the applicant, and following
the principles of natural justice.
If approved
̇ The MoEF will issue a prior environmental clearance for the project.
̇ The project proponent should make sure that the award of prior environmental
clearance is properly publicized in at least two local newspapers of the district or state
where the proposed project is located. For instance, the executive summary of the
prior environmental clearance may be published in the newspaper along with the
information about the location (website/office where it is displayed for public) where
the detailed prior environmental clearance is made available. The MoEF shall also
place the prior environmental clearance in the public domain on Government Portal.
Further copies of the prior environmental clearance shall be endorsed to the Heads of

local bodies, Panchayats and Municipal bodies in addition to the relevant offices of
the Government.
̇ The prior environmental clearance will be valid from the start date to actual
commencement of the production of the developmental activity.
̇ Usual validity period will be 5 years from the date of issuing environmental
clearance, unless specified by EAC.
̇ A prior environmental clearance issued to a project proponent can be transferred to
another legal person entitled to undertake the project, upon application by the
transferor to the concerned Authority or submission of no-objection of the transferor
by the transferee to the concerned Authority for the concurrence. In this case, EAC
concurrence is not required, but approval from the concerned authority is required to
avail the same project configurations, validity period transferred to the new legally
entitled person to undertake the project.
4.12 Post-clearance Monitoring Protocol
The MoEF, Government of India will monitor and take appropriate action under the EP
Act, 1986.
̇ In respect of Category A projects, it shall be mandatory for the project proponent to

make public the environmental clearance granted for their project along with the
environmental conditions and safeguards at their cost by advertising it at least in two
local newspapers of the district or State where the project is located and in addition,
this shall also be displayed in the project proponents website permanently.
̇ The MoEF shall also place the environmental clearance in the public domain on
Government Portal.
̇ Copies of environmental clearance shall be submitted by the project proponents to the
Heads of the local bodies, Panchayats and Municipal bodies in addition to the
relevant offices of the Government who in turn have to display the same for 30 days
from the date of receipt.
The project proponent must submit half-yearly compliance reports in respect of the
stipulated prior environmental clearance terms and conditions in hard and soft copies to
the regulatory authority concerned, on 1st June and 1st December of each calendar year.
All such compliance reports submitted by the project management shall be public
documents. Copies of the same shall be given to any person on application to the
concerned regulatory authority. Such latest such compliance report shall also be
displayed on the web site of the concerned regulatory authority
The SPCB shall incorporate EIA clearance conditions into consent conditions in respect
of Category A and Category B projects and in parallel shall monitor and enforce the
same.

Stakeholders’ Roles and Responsibilities
5.
STAKEHOLDERS’ ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Prior environmental clearance process involves many stakeholders i.e., Central

Government, State Government, EAC at the National Level, Public Agency, SPCB, the
project proponent, and the public.
̇ Roles and responsibilities of the organizations involved in different stages of prior

environmental clearance are listed in Table 5-1.
̇ Organization-specific functions are listed in Table 5-2.
In this Chapter, constitution, composition, functions, etc., of the Authorities and the
Committees are discussed in detail.
Table 5-1: Roles and Responsibilities of Stakeholders Involved in

Prior Environmental Clearance
Stage MoEF EAC Project EIA SPCB/ Public

Proponent Consultant Public and
Agency Interest
Group
Screening Receives Advises the Submits Advises and

application MoEF application assists the
and takes (Form 1) and proponent by
advice of provides providing
EAC necessary technical
information information
Scoping Approves Reviews the Submits the Prepares ToR
the ToR, ToR, visits the draft ToR to
communicat proposed site, MoEF and
es the same if required and facilitates the
to the project recommends visit of the
proponent the ToR to the EAC members
and places MoEF to the project
the same in site
the website
EIA Reviews and Submits Prepares the Reviews Participates
Report & forwards detailed EIA EIA report EIA report in public
Public copies of the report as per and hearings and
Presents and
Hearing EIA report the finalized conducts offers
appraises the
to SPCB ToR public comments
likely impacts
/public hearing in and
Facilitates the and pollution
agency for the manner observations
public hearing control
conducting prescribed .
by arranging measures
public
presentation proposed in Submits Comments
hearing
on the project, the public proceedings can be sent
Places the EIA and EMP hearing and views of directly to
summary of – takes note of SPCB, to SEIAA
EIA report objections and the through
in the updates the Authority Internet in

Stage MoEF EAC Project EIA SPCB/ Public

Proponent Consultant Public and
Agency Interest
Group
website EMP and the response to
accordingly project the summary
Conveys
proponent as placed in the
objections to
well website
the project
proponent
for update
Appraisal Receives Critically Submits Provides
and updated EIA examines the updated EIA , technical
Clearance reports, EMP reports advise to the
Takes advice
presentation of to MoEF. project
of EAC,
the proponent proponent and
approves Presents the
and appraises if necessary
EIA and overall EIA
MoEF presents the
attaches the and EMP
(recommendati proposed
terms and including
ons are measures for
conditions public
forwarded to mitigation of
concerns to
MoEF) likely impacts
EAC
(terms and
conditions of
clearance)
Post Implements Conducts Incorporates
Clearance environmental periodic the
Monitoring protection monitoring clearance
measures conditions
prescribed and into
submits appropriate
periodic consent
monitoring conditions
results and ensures
implementat
ion
Table 5-2: Organization-specific Functions
Organization Functions
Central ̇ Constitutes the EAC

Government ̇ Considering recommendations of the State Government, constitutes the SEIAA &
State EAC (SEAC)
̇ Receives application from the project proponent in case of Category A projects or
Category B projects attracting general condition
̇ Communicates the ToR finalized by the EAC to the project proponent.
̇ Receives EIA report from the project proponent and soft copy of summary of the
report for placing in the website
̇ Summary of EIA report will be placed in website. Forwards the received responses to
the project proponent
̇ Engages other public agency for conducting public hearings in cases where the SPCB
does not respond within time
̇ Receives updated EIA report from project proponent incorporating the considerations
from the proceedings of public hearing and responses received through other media

Organization Functions
̇ Forwards updated EIA report to the EAC for appraisal
̇ Either accepts the recommendations of EAC or asks for reconsideration of specific
issues for review by the EAC.
̇ Takes the final decision – acceptance/ rejection – of the project proposal and
communicates the same to the project proponent
EAC ̇ Reviews Form 1 and its attachments
̇ Visits site(s), if necessary
̇ Finalizes ToR and recommends to the Central Government, which in turn
communicates the finalized ToR to the project proponent, if not exempted by the
Notification
̇ Reviews EIA report, proceedings and appraises their views to the Central government
̇ If the Central Government has any specific views, then the EAC reviews again for
appraisal
SPCB ̇ Receives request from project proponent and conducts public hearing in the manner
prescribed.
̇ Conveys proceedings to concerned authority and project proponent
Public Agency ̇ Receives request from the respective Governments to conduct public hearing
̇ Conducts public hearing in the manner prescribed.
̇ Conveys proceedings to the concerned Authority/EAC /Project proponent
5.1 EAC
EAC is an independent Committee to review each developmental activity and offer its
recommendations for consideration of the Central Government.
A. Constitution
̇ EAC shall be constituted by the Central Government comprising a maximum of 15

members including a Chairperson and Secretary.
̇ The Central Government will notify committee.
̇ The Chairperson and the non-official member shall have a fixed term of three years,
from the date of Notification by the Central Government.
̇ The Chairperson shall be an eminent environmental expert with understanding on
environmental aspects and environmental impacts.
B. Composition
̇ Composition of EAC as per the Notification is given in Annexure XII.

̇ Secretary to EAC may invite a maximum of two professionals/experts with the prior
approval of the Chairperson, if desired, for taking the advisory inputs for appraisal. In
such case, the invited experts will not take part in the decision making process.
̇ The Secretary of each EAC preferably be an officer of the level equivalent to or
above the level of Director, MoEF, GoI.

C. Decision making
The EAC shall function on the principle of collective responsibility. The Chairperson
shall endeavour to reach a consensus in each case, and if consensus cannot be reached, the
view of the majority shall prevail.
D. Operational issues
̇ Secretary may deal with all correspondence, formulate agenda and prepare agenda
notes. Chairperson and other members may act only for the meetings.
̇ Chairperson of EAC shall be one among the expert members having considerable
professional experience with proven credentials.
̇ EAC shall meet at least once every month or more frequently, if so needed, to review
project proposals and to offer recommendations for the consideration of the
Authority.
̇ EAC members may inspect the site at various stages i.e., during screening, scoping
and appraisal, as per the need felt and decided by the Chairperson of the Committee.
̇ The MoEF through the Secretary of the Committee may pay/reimburse the
participation expenses, honorarium etc., to the Chairperson and members.
i. Tenure of EAC
The tenure of Authority/Committee(s) shall be for a fixed period of three years. At the
end of the three years period, the Authority and the committees need to be re-constituted.
However, staggered appointment dates may be adopted to maintain continuity of
members at a given point of time.
ii. Qualifying criteria for nomination of a member to EAC
While recommending nominations and while notifying the members of the Authority and
Expert Committees, it shall be ensured that all the members meet the following three
criteria:
̇ Professional qualification
̇ Relevant experience/Experience interfacing with environmental management
̇ Absence of conflict of interest
These are elaborated subsequently.
a) Professional qualification
The person should have at least (i) 5 years of formal University training in the concerned
discipline leading to a MA/MSc Degree, or (ii) in case of Engineering/Technology/
Architecture disciplines, 4 years formal training in a professional training course together
with prescribed practical training in the field leading to a B.Tech/B.E./B.Arch. Degree, or
(iii) Other professional degree (e.g., Law) involving a total of 5 years of formal
University training and prescribed practical training, or (iv) Prescribed
apprenticeship/articleship and pass examinations conducted by the concerned professional
association (e.g., MBA/IAS/IFS). In selecting the individual professionals, experience
gained by them in their respective fields will be taken note of.

b) Relevant experience
̇ Experience shall be related to professional qualification acquired by the person and be
related to one or more of the expertise mentioned for the expert members. Such
experience should be a minimum of 15 years.
̇ When the experience mentioned in the foregoing sub-paragraph interfaces with
environmental issues, problems and their management, the requirement for the length
of the experience can be reduced to a minimum of 10 years.
c) Absence of conflict of interest

For the deliberations of the EAC to be independent and unbiased, all possibilities of
potential conflict of interests have to be eliminated. Therefore, serving government
officers; persons engaged in industry and their associations; persons associated with the
formulation of development projects requiring prior environmental clearance, and persons
associated with environmental activism shall not be considered for membership of EAC.
iii. Age
Below 70 years for the members and below 72 years for the Chairperson of the EAC.
The applicability of the age is at the time of the Notification of the EAC by the Central
Government.
Summary regarding the eligibility criteria for Chairperson and Members of the EAC is
given in Table 5-3.
Table 5-3: EAC: Eligibility Criteria for Chairperson / Members / Secretary
S. Attribute Requirement
No.
Expert members Member-Secretary Chairperson
1 Professional Compulsory Compulsory Compulsory
qualification as per
the Notification
2 Experience a Professional Professional Professional
Qualification + 15 Qualification + 15 years Qualification + 15
(Fulfilling any
years of experience in of experience in one of years of experience in
one of a, b, c)
one of the expertise the expertise area one of the expertise
area mentioned in the mentioned in the area mentioned in the
Appendix VI Appendix VI Appendix VI
b Professional Professional Professional
Qualification +PhD+10 Qualification +PhD+10 Qualification
years of experience in years of experience in +PhD+10 years of
one of the expertise one of the expertise area experience in one of
area mentioned in the mentioned in the the expertise area
Appendix VI Appendix VI mentioned in
Appendix VI
c Professional Professional -------------
Qualification +10 years Qualification +10 years
of experience in one of of experience in one of
the expertise area the expertise area
mentioned in the mentioned in the
Appendix VI + 5 years Appendix VI + 5 years
interface with interface with

S. Attribute Requirement
No.
Expert members Member-Secretary Chairperson
environmental issues, environmental issues,
problems and their problems and their
management management
3 Test of independence Shall not be a serving In case of EAC, not less Shall not be a serving
(conflict of interest) government officer than a Director from the government officer
and minimum grade MoEF, Government of
Shall not be a person Shall not be a person
of the Secretary of the India
engaged in industry engaged in industry
Committees
and their associations and their associations
Shall not be a person Incase of SEAC, not Shall not be a person
associated with below the level of associated with
environmental activism Director/Chief Engineer environmental
from the State activism
Government (DoE)
4 Age Below 67 years at the As per state Government Below 72 Years at the
time of Notification of Service Rules time of the
the Committee Notification of the
Committee
5 Membership in Only one other than Shall not be a member in Shall not be a
Central/State Expert this nomination is other SEIAA/EAC/SEAC member in any other
Appraisal committee permitted SEIAA/EAC/SEAC
6 Tenure of earlier Only one term before Not applicable Only one term before
appointment this in continuity is this in continuity is
(continuous) permitted permitted
7 Eminent Desirable Not applicable Compulsory
environmental
expertise with
understanding on
environmental aspects
and impacts
Notes:
1. A member after continuous membership in two terms (six years) shall not be
considered for further continuation. His/her nomination may be reconsidered after a gap
of one term (three years), if other criteria meet.
2. Chairperson/Member once notified may not be removed prior to the tenure of 3 years
with out cause and proper enquiry. A member after continuous membership in two terms
(6 years) shall not be considered for further continuation. The same profile may be
considered for nomination after a gap of three years, i.e., one term, if other criteria are
meeting.
E. Other conditions that may be considered
̇ An expert member of one State/UT, can have at the most another State/UT
Committee membership, but in no case more than two Committees at a given point of
time.
̇ An expert member of a Committee shall not have membership continuously in the
same committee for more than two terms, i.e., six years. They can be nominated after

a gap of three years, i.e., one term. When a member of Committee has been
associated with any development project, which comes for prior environmental
clearance, he/she may not participate in the deliberations and the decisions in respect
to that particular project.
̇ At least four members shall be present in each meeting to fulfill the quorum
̇ If a member does not consecutively attend six meetings, without prior intimation to
the Committee his/her membership may be terminated by the Notifying Authority.
Prior information for absence due to academic pursuits, career development and
national/state-endorsed programmes may be considered as genuine grounds for
retention of membership.

ANNEXURE I
Modifications to Equipments Can Also Prevent Pollution - Opportunities
Modifications to Equipment Can Also Prevent Pollution - Oppurtunities*
Possible Approach
Potential Design Operational

Equipment Environment Problem Related Related
Compressors, P Shaft seal leaks, piston P Seal-less designs P Preventive maintenance
blowers, fans rod seal leaks, and vent (diaphragmatic, hermetic or program
streams magnetic)
P Design for low emissions

(internal balancing, double inlet,
gland eductors)
P Shaft seal designs (carbon

rings, double mechanical seals,
buffered seals)
P Double seal with barrier fluid

vented to control device
Concrete pads, P Leaks to groundwater P Water stops P Reduce unnecessary purges,
floors, sumps transfers, and sampling
P Embedded metal plates
P Epoxy sealing P Use drip pans where

necessary
P Other impervious sealing
Controls P Shutdowns and start- P Improve on-line controls P Continuous versus batch
ups generate waste and
releases P On-line instrumentation P Optimize on-line run time
P Automatic start-up and P Optimize shutdown interlock

shutdown inspection frequency
P Identify safety and

P On-line vibration analysis environment critical instruments
and equipment
P Use “consensus” systems (e.g.,

shutdown trip requires 2 out of 3
affirmative responses)
Distillation P Impurities remain in P Increase reflux ratio P Change column operating
process streams conditions
P Add section to column - reflux ratio
- feed tray
P Column intervals - temperature
- pressure
P Change feed tray - etc.
(Continued)
Possible Approach

Distillation P Impurities remain in P Insulate to prevent heat loss P Clean column to reduce
(cont.) process streams (cont.) fouling
P Preheat column feed
P Increase vapor line size to

lower pressure drop
P Large amounts of P Use reboilers or inert gas P Use higher temperature steam
contaminated water stripping agents
condensate from stream
stripping
General P Contaminated P Provide roof over process P Return samples to process
manufacturing rainwater facilities
equipment
areas P Segregate process sewer from P Monitor stormwater discharge
storm sewer (diking)
P Hard-pipe process streams to

process sewer
P Contaminated P Seal floors

sprinkler and fire water
P Drain to sump
P Route to waste treatment
P Leaks and emissions P Design for cleaning P Use drip pans for maintenance
during cleaning activities
P Design for minimum rinsing
P Rinse to sump
P Design for minimum sludge
P Reuse cleaning solutions
P Provide vapor enclosure
P Drain to process
Heat P Increased waste due to P Use intermediate exchangers to P Select operating temperatures
exchangers high localized avoid contact with furnace tubes at or near ambient temperature
temperatures and walls when-ever possible. These are
generally most desirable from a
P Use staged heating to minimize pollution prevention standpoint
product degradation and
unwanted side reactions. P Use lower pressure steam to
(waste heat >>low pressure steam lower temperatures
>>high pressure steam)
(Continued)
Possible Approach

Heat P Increased waste due to P Use scraped wall exchangers in P Monitor exchanger fouling to
exchangers high localized viscous service correlate process conditions
(cont.) temperatures (cont.) which increase fouling, avoid
P Using falling film reboiler, conditions which rapidly foul
piped recirculation reboiler or exchangers
high-flux tubes
P Use lowest pressure steam P Use on-line tube cleaning

possible techniques to keep tube surfaces
clean
P Contaminated P Use welded tubes or double P Monitor for leaks

materials due to tubes tube sheets with inert purge.
leaking at tube sheets Mount vertically
P Furnace emissions P Use superheat of high-pressure

steam in place of a furnace
Piping P Leaks to groundwater; P Design equipment layout so as P Monitor for corrosion and
fugitive emissions to minimize pipe run length erosion
P Eliminate underground piping P Paint to prevent external

or design for cathodic protection corrosion
if necessary to install piping
underground
P Welded fittings
P Reduce number of flanges and

valves
P All welded pipe
P Secondary containment
P Spiral-wound gaskets
P Use plugs and double valves for

open end lines
P Change metallurgy
P Use lined pipe

(Continued)
Possible Approach

Piping (cont.) P Releases when P Use “pigs” for cleaning P Flush to product storage tank
cleaning or purging lines
P Slope to low point drain
P Use heat tracing and insulation

to prevent freezing
P Install equalizer lines

Pumps P Fugitive emissions P Mechanical seal in lieu of P Seal installation practices
from shaft seal leaks packing
P Monitor for leaks
P Double mechanical seal with
inert barrier fluid
P Double machined seal with

barrier fluid vented to control
device
P Seal-less pump (canned motor

magnetic drive)
P Vertical pump
P Fugitive emissions P Use pressure transfer to

from shaft seal leaks eliminate pump
P Residual “heel” of P Low point drain on pump P Flush casing to process sewer
liquid during pump casing for treatment
maintenance
P Increase the mean time
between pump failures by:
- selecting proper seal material;
- good alignment;
- reduce pipe-induced stress
- Maintaining seal lubrication
P Injection of seal flush P Use double mechanical seal

fluid into process stream with inert barrier fluid where
practical
Reactors P Poor conversion or P Static mixing P Add ingredients with optimum
performance due to sequence
inadequate mixing P Add baffles
P Change impellers
(Continued)
Possible Approach

Reactors P Poor conversion P Add horsepower P Allow proper head space in
(cont.) (cont.) reactor to enhance vortex effect
P Add distributor
P Waste by-product P Provide separate reactor for P Optimize reaction conditions

formation converting recycle streams to (temperature, pressure, etc.)
usable products
Relief Valve P Leaks P Provide upstream rupture disc
P Fugitive emissions P Vent to control or recovery P Monitor for leaks and for
device control efficiency
P Discharge to P Pump discharges to suction of P Monitor for leaks

environment from over pump
pressure
P Thermal relief to tanks
P Avoid discharge to roof areas to

prevent contamination of
rainwater
P Frequent relief P Use pilot operated relief valve P Reduce operating pressure
P Increase margin between design P Review system performance

and operating pressure
Sampling P Waste generation due P In-line insitu analyzers P Reduce number and size of
to sampling (disposal, samples required
containers, leaks, P System for return to process
fugitives, etc.) P Sample at the lowest possible
P Closed loop temperature
P Drain to sump P Cool before sampling
Tanks P Tank breathing and P Cool materials before storage P Optimize storage conditions to
working losses reduce losses
P Insulate tanks
P Vent to control device (flare,

condenser, etc.)
P Vapor balancing
P Floating roof
(Continued)
Possible Approach

Tanks (cont.) P Tank breathing and P Floating roof
working losses (cont.)
P Higher design pressure
P Leak to groundwater P All aboveground (situated so P Monitor for leaks and

bottom can routinely be checked corrosion
for leaks)
P Secondary containment
P Improve corrosion resistance
P Large waste heel P Design for 100% de-inventory P Recycle to process if practical
Vacuum P Waste discharge from P Substitute mechanical vacuum P Monitor for air leaks
Systems jets pump
P Evaluate using process fluid for P Recycle condensate to process

powering jet
Valves P Fugitive emissions P Bellow seals P Stringent adherence to packing
from leaks procedures
P Reduce number where practical
P Special packing sets

Vents P Release to P Route to control or recovery P Monitor performance
environment device
* Source: Profile of the Organic Chemical Industry, 2nd Edition, Sector Notebook Project, November 2002
ANNEXURE II
Process Flow Diagrams of Olefins and Aromatics
Figure 1: Block Diagram: Olefin Manufacture*
C4 raffinate Propynes (to flare /
Solvent fuel gas system) Butadiene
Solvent
Sodium
nitrite Extraction Solvent Extraction Topping Tailing
Distillation stripper Distillation Tower Tower
Tower
C4 Feed C4 feed
Preparation
C3’s to Heavier distillation

Cracker backends
C4 vapor
Distillation Solvent
Recovery C4 acetylene (to flare
/ fuel gas system)
Polymers
Sodium
Nitrite Solvent Purge
(re-used) Solvent for recycle
Figure 2: Simplified Flow Diagram – Butadiene Manufacture*

Raffinate (to
storage)
Hydrogen Raffinate Water

C5 cut Recycle H2 wash stripper
column
Benzene
Solvent recovery Clay
Pyrolysis Hydrotreating Hydrotreating Extractor Fractionation
Solvent to column Tower
Gasoline from (1st stage) (2nd stage) Toluene
cracker complex regenerator
Xylene
aromatic
Stripper Solvent to
regenerator
Solvent to
regenerator
Figure 3: Benzene / Toluene Extraction From Pyrolysis

Gasoline (using Liquid – Liquid Extraction)*
Recycle Hydrogen
Hydrogen
Fuel Gas
Hydro-
Pyrolysis Separator Stripper
Furnace genation
Gasoline
Reactor
Hydrogenated
stream
Figure 4: Process Flow Diagram for Hydrotreating*

C6 Raffinate
Recycle Raffinate
H2 Solvent Column
C5 cut
H2 Solvent
Hydro- recycle
genation Extraction
Pyrolysis Hydrogenation Stage II Pure Aromatic
Gasoline stage I
Product
Stripper
Solvent recycle
Figure 5: Benzene / Toluene Extraction from Pygas using Extractive Distillation*

Methane +
Hydrogen Light Hydrocarbon
(fuel gas) (fuel gas)
Hydrogen
make-up To Benzene
Storage
Fresh Heater Reactor Separator Stabilizer Benzene

Toluene
(@ 750 0C) (Dealk. Catalyst) Column Fractionating
Feed
column
Heavier
Recycled Toluene and Heavier Aromatics Purge
Figure 6: Process Flow Diagram of a Toluene Dealkylation Unit (HDA)*

Recycle Toluene
Recycle Hydrogen
Benzene Xylene
Light Ends
Fixed
Furnace Bed Separator Stabilizer Clay Benzene Toluene Xylene
Toluene Reactor Column Tower Fractionator Fractionator Fractionators
Heavy Ends
Heaviers (recycle)
Figure 7: Toluene Disproportionation Process Flow Diagram (Tatoray Process)*

Hydrotreater Reformer C7 & lowers
Straight Unit Unit
run light De-Heptaniser
Naphtha
C8 Reformate
C8 Isomerate
o-Xylene
Solvent C9 Rerun Orthometa PAREX

Column Splitter Unit (Mol. Sieves) p-Xylene
H2
Mix Xylene +
Ethyl benzene
Recycle Gas
Benzene/Toluene/ Stabiliser Isomerisation

Heater
Lighters for Gujarat Column Unit
Refinery
p-Xylene
Figure 8: Block Diagram of Xylene Process (IPCL, Vadodara)*

Recycle Hydrogen
Hydrogen
Fuel Gas
Hydro-
Naphtha Separator Stripper
Furnace genation
Reactor
Hydrotreated
Stream
(stream I)
Figure 9: Process Flow Diagram for Hydro-Treating*

Hydrotreated Naphtha
stream 1
Heater Reactor 1 Heater Reactor 2 Heater Reactor 3 Heater Reactor 4
H2 rich gas
Recycle H2
H2
Fuel gas
Stabilizer Flash
Column Drum
Stabilized
reformate
Figure 10: Process Flow Diagram for Reformer Unit*
Note:
* Development of National Emission Standards for Petrochemical Plants, CPCB, 2008
ANNEXURE III
A Compilation of Legal Instruments
Sl. Legal Instrument Responsible Ministries Chemical Use Categories/ Objective of Legislation Relevant Articles/Provisions
No. (Type, Reference, or Bodies Pollutants
Year)
1 Air (Prevention and Central Pollution Air pollutants from chemical The prevention, control and Section 2: Definitions
Control of Pollution) Control Board and State industries abatement of air pollution Section 21: Consent from State Boards
Act, 1981 amended Pollution Control Section 22: Not to allow emissions exceeding
1987 Boards prescribed limits
Section 24: Power of Entry and Inspection
Section 25: Power to Obtain Information
Section 26: Power to Take Samples
Section 37-43: Penalties and Procedures
2 Air (Prevention and Central Pollution Air pollutants from chemical The prevention, control and Rule 2: Definitions
Control of Pollution) Control Board and State industries abatement of air pollution Rule 9: Consent Applications
(Union Territories) Pollution Control
Rules, 1983 Boards
3 Water (Prevention and Central Pollution Water Pollutants from water The prevention and control Section 2: Definitions
Control of Pollution) Control Board and State polluting industries of water pollution and also Section 20: Power to Obtain Information
Act, 1974 amended Pollution Control maintaining or restoring the Section 21: Power to Take Samples
1988 Boards wholesomeness of water Section 23: Power of Entry and Inspection
Section 24: Prohibition on Disposal
Section 25: Restriction on New Outlet and New
Discharge
Section 26: Provision regarding existing discharge
of sewage or trade effluent
Section 27: Refusal or withdrawal of consent by
state boards
4 Water (Prevention and Central Pollution Water Pollutants from water The prevention and control Rule 2: Definitions
Control of Pollution) Control Board and State polluting industries of water pollution and also
Rule 30: Power to take samples
Rules, 1975 Pollution Control maintaining or restoring the
Boards wholesomeness of water Rule 32: Consent Applications
5 The Environment Ministry of All types of environmental Protection and Improvement Section 2: Definitions
(Protection) Act, 1986, Environment and pollutants of the Environment
Section 7: Not to allow emission or discharge of
i
Year)
amended 1991 Forests, Central environmental pollutants in excess of prescribed

Pollution Control Board standards
and State Pollution
Section 8: Handing of Hazardous Substances
Control Boards
Section 10: Power of Entry and Inspection
Section 11: Power to take samples
6 Environmental Ministry of All types of Environmental Protection and Improvement Rule 2: Definitions
(Protection) Rules, 1986 Environment and Pollutants of the Environment
Rule 3: Standards for emission or discharge of
(Amendments in 1999, Forests, Central
environmental pollutants
2001, 2002, 2002, 2002, Pollution Control Board
2003, 2004) and State Pollution Rule 5: Prohibition and restriction on the location of
Control Boards industries and the carrying on process and
operations in different areas
Rule 13: Prohibition and restriction on the handling
of hazardous substances in different areas
Rule 14: Submission of environmental statement
7 Hazardous Waste MoEF, CPCB, SPCB, Hazardous Wastes generated Management & Handling of Rule 2: Application
(Management and DGFT, Port Authority from industries using hazardous hazardous wastes in line with Rule 3: Definitions
Handling) Rules, 1989 and Customs Authority chemicals the Basel convention Rule 4: Responsibility of the occupier and operator
amended 2000 and 2003 of a facility for handling of wastes
Rule 4A: Duties of the occupier and operator of a
facility
Rule 4B: Duties of the authority
Rule 5: Grant of authorization for handling
hazardous wastes
Rule 6: Power to suspend or cancel authorization
Rule 7: Packaging, labeling and transport of
hazardous wastes
Rule 8: Disposal sites
Rule 9: Record and returns
Rule 10: Accident reporting and follow up
ii
Year)
Rule 11: Import and export of hazardous waste for

dumping and disposal
Rule 12: Import and export of hazardous waste for
recycling and reuse
Rule 13: Import of hazardous wastes
Rule 14: Export of hazardous waste
Rule 15: Illegal traffic
Rule 16: Liability of the occupier, transporter and
operator of a facility
Rule 19: Procedure for registration and renewal of
registration of recyclers and re-refiners
Rule 20: Responsibility of waste generator
8 Manufacture Storage Ministry of Hazardous Chemicals - Toxic, Regulate the manufacture, Rule 2: Definitions
and Import of Environment & Forests, Explosive, Flammable, storage and import of Rule 4: responsibility of the Occupier
Hazardous Chemicals Chief Controller of Reactive Hazardous Chemicals Rule 5: Notification of Major Accidents
Rules, 1989 amended Imports and Exports, Rule 7-8: Approval and notification of site and
2000 CPCB, SPCB, Chief updating
Inspector of Factories, Rule 10-11: Safety Reports and Safety Audit reports
Chief Inspector of Dock and updating
Safety, Chief Inspector Rule 13: Preparation of Onsite Emergency Plan
of Mines, AERB, Chief Rule 14: Preparation of Offsite Emergency Plan
Controller of Rule 15: Information to persons likely to get
Explosives, District affected
Collector or District Rule 16: Proprietary Information
Emergency Authority, Rule 17: Material Safety Data Sheets
CEES under DRDO Rule 18: Import of Hazardous Chemicals
9 Chemical Accidents CCG, SCG, DCG, LCG Hazardous Chemicals - Toxic, Emergency Planning Rule 2: Definitions
(Emergency Planning, and MAH Units Explosive, Flammable, Preparedness and Response Rule 5: Functions of CCG
Preparedness and Reactive to chemical accidents Rule 7: Functions of SCG
Response) Rules, 1996 Rule 9: Functions of DCG
Rule 10: Functions of LCG
10 EIA Notification, 2006 MoEF, SPCB For all the identified Requirement of Requirements and procedure for seeking
developmental activities in the environmental clearance environmental clearance of projects
before establishment of or
iii
Year)
notification modernization / expansion of

identified developmental
projects.
11 Public Liability Ministry of Hazardous Substances To provide immediate relief Section 2: Definitions
Insurance Act, 1991 Environment & Forests, to persons affected by Section 3: Liability to give relief in certain cases on
amended 1992 District Collector accident involving hazardous principle of no fault
substances Section 4: Duty of owner to take out insurance
policy
Section 7A: Establishment of Environmental Relief
Fund
Section 14-18: Penalties and Offences
12 Public Liability Ministry of Hazardous Substances To provide immediate relief Rule 2: Definitions
Insurance Rules, 1991 Environment & Forests, to persons affected by Rule 6: Establishment of administration of fund
amended 1993 District Collector accident involving hazardous Rule 10: Extent of liability
substances and also for Rule 11: Contribution of the owner to
Establishing an environmental relief fund
Environmental Relief fund
13 Factories Act, 1948 Ministry of Labour, Chemicals as specified in the Control of workplace Section 2: Interpretation
DGFASLI and Table environment, and providing Section 6: Approval, licensing and registration of
Directorate of Industrial for good health and safety of factories
Safety and workers Section 7A: General duties of the occupier
Health/Factories Section 7B: General duties of manufacturers etc., as
Inspectorate regards articles and substances for use in factories
Section 12: Disposal of wastes and effluents
Section 14: Dust and fume
Section 36: Precautions against dangerous fumes,
gases, etc.
Section 37: Explosion or inflammable dust, gas, etc.
Chapter IVA: Provisions relating to Hazardous
processes
Section 87: Dangerous operations
Section 87A: Power to prohibit employment on
account of serious hazard
Section 88: Notice of certain accident
iv
Year)
Section 88A: Notice of certain dangerous

occurrences
Chapter X: Penalties and procedures
14 The Petroleum Act, Ministry of Petroleum Petroleum (Class A, B and C - Regulate the import, Section 2: Definitions
1934 and Natural Gas as defined in the rules) transport, storage, Section 3: Import, transport and storage of
production, refining and petroleum
blending of petroleum Section 5: Production, refining and blending of
petroleum
Section 6: Receptacles of dangerous petroleum to
show a warning
Section 23-28 Penalties and Procedure
15 The Petroleum Rules, Ministry of Petroleum Petroleum (Class A, B and C - Regulate the import, Rule 2: Definition
2002 and Natural Gas, as defined in the rules) transport, storage, Chapter I part II: General Provision
Ministry of Shipping production, refining and Chapter II: Importation of Petroleum
(for notification of blending of petroleum Chapter III: Transport of Petroleum
authorized ports for Chapter VII: Licenses
import), Ministry of
Environment & Forests
or SPCB (for clearance
of establishment of
loading/unloading
facilities at ports) Chief
Controller of
Explosives, district
authority,
Commissioner of
Customs, Port
Conservator, State
Maritime Board
(Import)
16 The Calcium Carbide Ministry of Petroleum Calcium Carbide To regulate the import, Rule 2: Definitions
Rules, 1987 and Natural Gas, Chief production, storage, Chapter II: General provisions
Controller of transportation, sale, use and Chapter III: Importation of Carbide
Explosives, Customs handling and disposal of Chapter IV: Transportation of carbide
v
Year)
Collector, Port Calcium carbide with a view Chapter V: Storage of carbide

Conservator, DGCA, to prevent accidents Chapter VI: Licensing
District Authority Chapter VII: Notice of accident
17 The Explosives Act, Ministry of Commerce Explosive substances as defined To regulate the manufacture, Section 4: Definition
1884 and Industry under the Act possession, use, sale, Section 6: Power for Central government to prohibit
(Department of transport, export and import the manufacture, possession or importation of
Explosives) of explosives with a view to especially dangerous explosives
prevent accidents Section 6B: Grant of Licenses
18 The Explosive Rules, Ministry of Commerce Explosive substances as defined To regulate the manufacture, Rule 2: Definition
1983 and Industry and Chief under the Act possession, use, sale, Chapter II: General Provisions
Controller of transport, export and import Chapter III: Import and Export
Explosives, port of explosives with a view to Chapter IV: Transport
conservator, customs prevent accidents Chapter V: Manufacture of explosives
collector, railway Chapter VI: Possession sale and use
administration Chapter VII: Licenses
19 The Gas Cylinder Ministry of Commerce Gases (Toxic, non toxic and Regulate the import, storage, Rule 2: Definition
Rules, 2004 and Industry and Chief non flammable, non toxic and handling and transportation Chapter II: General Provisions
Controller of flammable, Dissolved of gas cylinders with a view Chapter III: Importation of Cylinder
Explosives, port Acetylene Gas, Non toxic and to prevent accidents Chapter IV: Transport of Cylinder
conservator, customs flammable liquefiable gas other Chapter VII: Filling and Possession
collector, DGCA, DC, than LPG, LPG
DM, Police (sub
inspector to
commissioner)
20 The Static and Mobile Ministry of Commerce Gases (Toxic, non toxic and Regulate the import, Rule 2: Definition
Pressure Vessels and Industry and Chief non flammable, non toxic and manufacture, design, Chapter III: Storage
(Unfired) Rules, 1981 Controller of flammable, Dissolved installation, transportation, Chapter IV: Transport
Explosives, port Acetylene Gas, Non toxic and handling, use and testing of Chapter V: Licenses
conservator, customs flammable liquefiable gas other mobile and static pressure
collector, DGCA, DC, than LPG, LPG vessels (unfired) with a view
DM, Police (sub to prevent accidents
inspector to
commissioner)
vi
Year)
21 The Motor Vehicle Act, Ministry of Shipping, Hazardous and Dangerous To consolidate and amend Section 2: Definition
1988 Road Transport and Goods the law relating to motor Chapter II: Licensing of drivers of motor vehicle
Highways vehicles Chapter VII: Construction equipment and
maintenance of motor vehicles
22 The Central Motor Ministry of Shipping, Hazardous and Dangerous To consolidate and amend Rule 2: Definition
Vehicle Rules, 1989 Road Transport and Goods the law relating to motor Rule 9: Educational qualification for driver’s of
Highways vehicles including to regulate goods carriages carrying dangerous or hazardous
the transportation of goods
dangerous goods with a view Rule 129: Transportation of goods of dangerous or
to prevent loss of life or hazardous nature to human life
damage to the environment Rule 129A: Spark arrestors
Rule 130: Manner of display of class labels
Rule 131: Responsibility of the consignor for safe
transport of dangerous or hazardous goods
Rule 132: Responsibility of the transporter or owner
of goods carriage
Rule 133: Responsibility of the driver
Rule 134: Emergency Information Panel
Rule 135: Driver to be instructed
Rule 136: Driver to report to the police station
about accident
Rule 137: Class labels
23 The Custom Act, 1962 CBEC, Ministry of Hazardous Goods To prevent entry of illegal Section 2: definitions
Finance hazardous goods or banned Section 11: Power to Prohibit Importation or
goods including hazardous or Exportation of Goods
banned chemicals
24 The Merchant Shipping Ministry of Shipping, All packaged cargo including For safe handling and Section 3: Definitions
Act, 1958 amended in Road Transport and Dangerous and hazardous goods transportation of cargo Section 331: Carriage of Dangerous Goods
2002 and 2003 Highways as defined in the rules including dangerous goods to
prevent accident
25 Merchant Shipping Ministry of Shipping, All packaged cargo including For safe handling and
(carriage of Cargo) Road Transport and Dangerous and hazardous goods transportation of cargo
Rules 1995 Highways as defined in the rules including dangerous goods to
vii
Year)
prevent accident
26 The Indian Port Act, Ministry of Shipping, All Chemicals - handling and For control of activities on Section 2: Definitions
1908 Road Transport and storage ports including safety of Chapter IV: Rules for the safety of shipping and the
Highways shipping and conservation of conservation of ports
ports Chapter VII: Provisions with respect to penalties
27 The Dock Workers, Ministry of Labour, All Chemicals termed as Safety of Dock workers
(Safety, Health and DGFASLI and dangerous goods including handling of
Welfare) Act, 1986 Directorate of Dock dangerous goods
Safety
28 The Dock Workers, Ministry of Labour, All Chemicals termed as Safety of Dock workers
(Safety, Health and DGFASLI and dangerous goods including handling of
Welfare) Rules, 1990 Directorate of Dock dangerous goods
Safety
viii
ANNEXURE IV
General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants as per
CPCB
Table: Water Quality Standards
1. Colour and odour See Note-1 --- See Note-1 See Note-1
2. Suspended Solids, mg/l, Max 100 600 200 (a) For process waste
water-100
(b) For cooling water
effluent-10 per cent
above total suspended
matter of influent
cooling water.
3. Particle size of suspended solids Shall pass 850 micron --- --- (a) Floatable solids,
IS Sieve Max 3 mm
(b) Settleable solids
Max 850 microns.
4. Dissolved solids (inorganic), mg/a, mac 2100 2100 2100 ---
5. pH value 5.5 to 9.0 5.5 to 9.0 5.5 to 9.0 5.5 to 9.0
6. Temperature oC, Max Shall not exceed 40 in 45 at the point of --- 45 at the point of
any section of the discharge discharge
stream within 15
meters down stream
from the effluent
outlet
7. Oil and grease, mg/l, max 10 20 10 20
8. Total residual chlorine, mg/l, Max. 1.0 --- --- 1.0
9. Ammonical nitrogen (as N), mg/l, Max. 50 50 --- 50
10. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as N), mg/l, 100 --- --- 100
Max.
11. Free Ammonia (as NH3), mg/l, Max. 5.0 --- --- 5.0
12. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5 days at 30 350 100 100
20oC) Max.
13. Chemical Oxygen Demand, mg/l, Max. 250 --- --- 250
14. Arsenic (as As), mg/l, Max. 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
15. Mercury (as Hg), mg/l, Max. 0.01 0.01 --- 0.01
16. Lead (as Pb), mg/l, Max. 0.1 1.0 --- 1.0
17. Cadmium (as Cd), mg/l, Max. 2.0 1.0 --- 2.0
i
18. Hexavalent chromium (as Cr+6) mg/l, 0.1 2.0 --- 1.0
Max.
19. Total chromium as (Cr), mg/l, Max. 2.0 2.0 --- 2.0
20. Copper (as Cu), mg/l, Max. 3.0 3.0 --- 3.0
21. Zinc (as Zn), mg/l, Max. 5.0 15 --- 15
22. Selenium (as Se), mg/l, Max. 0.05 0.05 --- 0.05
23. Nickel (as Ni), mg/l, Max. 3.0 3.0 --- 5.0
24. Boron (as B), mg/l, Max. 2.0 2.0 2.0 ---
25. Percent Sodium, Max. --- 60 60 ---
26. Residual sodium carbonate, mg/l, Max. --- --- 5.0 ---
27. Cyanide (as CN), mg/l, Max. 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2
28. Chloride (as Cl), mg/l, Max. 1000 1000 600 (a)
29. Fluoride (as F), mg/l, Max. 2.0 15 --- 15
30. Dissolved Phosphates (as P), mg/l, 5.0 --- --- ---
Max.
31. Sulphate (as SO4), mg/l, Max. 1000 1000 1000 ---
32. Sulphide (as S), mg/l, Max. 2.0 --- --- 5.0
33. Pesticides Absent Absent Absent Absent
34. Phenolic compounds (as C6H5OH), 1.0 5.0 --- 5.0
mg/l, Max.
35. Radioactive materials
(a) Alpha emitters MC/ml, Max. 10-7 10-7 10-8 10-7
(b) Beta emitters uc/ml, Max.
10-6 10-6 10-7 10-6
Note :-
1. All efforts should be made to remove colour and unpleasant odour as far as practicable.
2. The standards mentioned in this notification shall apply to all the effluents discharged such as industrial mining and mineral processing
activities municipal sewage etc.
ii
Ambient air quality standards in respect of noise
Area Code Category of Area Limits in dB (A) Leq

Day Time Night Time
(A) Industrial area 75 70
(B) Commercial area 65 55
(C) Residential area 55 45
(D) Silence zone 50 40
Note :
1. Day time is reckoned in between 6.00 AM and 9.00 PM
2. Night time is reckoned in between 9.00 PM and 6.00 AM
3. Silence zone is defined as areas upto 100 meters around such premises as hospitals,
educational institutions and courts. The Silence zones are to be declared by the
Competent Authority.
4. Use of vehicular horns, loudspeakers and bursting of crackers shall be banned in these
zones.
5. Mixed categories of areas should be declared as one of the four above mentioned
categories by the Competent Authority and the corresponding standards shall apply.
The total sound power level, Lw, of a DG set should be less than, 94+10 log10 (KVA), dB (A), at the
manufacturing stage, where, KVA is the nominal power rating of a DG set.
This level should fall by 5 dB (A) every five years, till 2007, i.e. in 2002 and then in 2007.
Noise from the DG set should be controlled by providing an acoustic enclosure or by treating the room
acoustically.
The acoustic enclosure/acoustic treatment of the room should be designed for minimum 25 dB(A) Insertion
Loss or for meeting the ambient noise standards, whichever is on the higher side (if the actual ambient noise
is on the higher side, it may not be possible to check the performance of the acoustic enclosure/acoustic
treatment. Under such circumstances the performance may be checked for noise reduction upto actual
ambient noise level, preferably, in the night time). The measurement for Insertion Loss may be done at
different points at 0.5m from the acoustic enclosure/room, and then averaged.
The DG set should also be provide with proper exhaust muffler with Insertion Loss of minimum 25 dB(A).
1. The manufacturer should offer to the user a standard acoustic enclosure of 25 dB(A) Insertion Loss
and also a suitable exhaust muffler with Insertion Loss of 25 dB(A).
i
2. The user should make efforts to bring down the noise levels due to the DG set, outside his premises,
within the ambient noise requirements by proper siting and control measures.
3. The manufacturer should furnish noise power levels of the unlicensed DG sets as per standards
prescribed under (A)
4. The total sound power level of a DG set, at the user's end, shall be within 2 dB(A) of the total sound
power level of the DG set, at the manufacturing stage, as prescribed under (A).
5. Installation of a DG set must be strictly in compliance with the recommendation of the DG set
manufacturer.
6. A proper routine and preventive maintenance procedure for the DG set should be set and followed in
consultation with the DG set manufacturer which would help prevent noise levels of the DG set from
deteriorating with use.
(5th December, 2001)
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, (29 of 1986),
read with the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs notification S.O. 667 (E) bearing No. F.No. U-
11030/J/91-VTL dated 10th September, 1992, the Lt. Governor of Government of National Capital of Delhi
hereby directs to all owners/users of generators sets in the National Capital Territory of Delhi as follows :-
1. that generator sets above the capacity of 5 KVA shall not be operated in residential areas between
the hours of 10.00 PM to 6.00 AM;
2. that the generator sets above the capacity of 5 KVA in all areas residential/commercial/industrial
shall operate only with the mandatory acoustic enclosures and other standards prescribed in the
Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986;
3. that mobile generator sets used in social gatherings and public functions shall be permitted only if
they have installed mandatory acoustic enclosures and adhere to the prescribed standards for noise
and emission as laid down in the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986.
The contravention of the above directions shall make the offender liable for prosecution under section 15 of
the said Act which stipulates punishment of imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years with
fine which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both, and in case the failure of contravention continues,
with additional fine which may extend to five thousand rupees for every day during which such failure or
contravention continues after the conviction for the first such failure or contravention and if still the failure or
contravention continues beyond a period of one year after the date of contravention, the offender continues
beyond a period of one year after the date of contravention, the offender shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years.
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986) read
with the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs notification S.O. 667(E) bearing No. U-11030/J/91-VTL dated
the 10th September, 1992, the Lt. Governor Govt. of the National Capital Territory of Delhi hereby makes the
following amendment/modification in his order dated the 5th December, 2001 regarding the operation of
generator sets, namely:-
In the above said order, for clause(1), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
ii
“(1) that the generator sets above 5KVA shall not be operated in residential areas between the hours from
10.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m. except generator sets of Group Housing Societies and Multi-storey residential
apartments”.
The minimum height of stack to be provided with each generator set can be worked out using the following
formula:
H = h +0.2 Ì √KVA
H = Total height of stack in metre
h = Height of the building in metres where the generator set is installed
KVA = Total generator capacity of the set in KVA
Based on the above formula the minimum stack height to be provided with different range of generator sets
may be categorized as follows:
For Generator Sets Total Height of stack in metre
50 KVA Ht. of the building + 1.5 metre
50-100 KVA Ht. of the building + 2.0 metre
100- 150 KVA Ht. of the building + 2.5 metre
Similarly for higher KVA ratings a stack height can be worked out using the above formula
Source: Evolved By CPCB
[Emission Regulations Part IV: COINDS/26/1986-87]
iii
ANNEXURE V
Form 1 (Application Form for Obtaining EIA Clearance)
FORM 1
(I) BASIC INFORMATION
S. No. Item Details
1. Name of the project/s

2. S.No. in the schedule
3. Proposed capacity/area/length/tonnage to be
handled/command area/lease area/number of
wells to be drilled
4. New/Expansion/Modernization
5. Existing Capacity/Area etc.
6. Category of Project i.e., ‘A’ or ‘B’
7. Does it attract the general condition? If yes,
please specify.
8. Does it attract the specific condition? If yes,
Please specify.
9. Location
Plot/Survey/Khasra No.
Village
Tehsil
District
State
10. Name of the applicant
11. Registered Address
12. Address for correspondence:
Name
Designation (Owner/Partner/CEO)
Address
Pin Code
E-mail
Telephone No.
Fax No.
13. Details of alternative Sites examined, if any Village-District-State
location of these sites should be shown on a 1.
toposheet.
2.
3.
1
S. No. Item Details
14. Interlined Projects

15. Whether separate application of interlined
project has been submitted
16. If yes, date of submission
17. If no, reason
18. Whether the proposal involves
approval/clearance under:
The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
The C.R.Z. Notification, 1991
19. Forest land involved (hectares)
20. Whether there is any litigation pending against
the project and/or land in which the project is
propose to be set up
Name of the Court
Case No.
Orders/directions of the Court, if any and its
relevance with the proposed project.
(II) ACTIVITY
1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving
actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use,
changes in water bodies, etc.)
Details thereof (with

approximate quantities
/rates, wherever
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No possible) with source of
information data
1.1 Permanent or temporary change in land use,

land cover or topography including increase
in intensity of land use (with respect to local
land use plan)
1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation and
buildings?
1.3 Creation of new land uses?
1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore

houses, soil testing?
1.5 Construction works?
2
/rates, wherever
information data
1.6 Demolition works?
1.7 Temporary sites used for construction works

or housing of construction workers?
1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or
earthworks including linear structures, cut
and fill or excavations
1.9 Underground works including mining or
tunneling?
1.10 Reclamation works?
1.11 Dredging?
1.12 Offshore structures?
1.13 Production and manufacturing processes?
1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or materials?
1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid
waste or liquid effluents?
1.16 Facilities for long term housing of operational
workers?
1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during
construction or operation?
1.18 New road, rail, air waterborne or other
transport infrastructure including new or
altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc?
1.19 Closure or diversion of existing transport
routes or infrastructure leading to changes in
traffic movements?
1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or
pipelines?
1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting,
realignment or other changes to the hydrology
of watercourses or aquifers?
1.22 Stream crossings?
1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water form ground
or surface waters?
1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land surface
affecting drainage or run-off?
1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for
construction, operation or decommissioning?
3
/rates, wherever
information data
1.26 Long-term dismantling or decommissioning

or restoration works?
1.27 Ongoing activity during decommissioning
which could have an impact on the
environment?
1.28 Influx of people to an area in either
temporarily or permanently?
1.29 Introduction of alien species?
1.30 Loss of native species or genetic diversity?
1.31 Any other actions?
2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project

(such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are
non-renewable or in short supply):

S.No. Information/checklist confirmation Yes/No approximate quantities
/rates, wherever possible)
with source of
information data
2.1 Land especially undeveloped or agricultural
land (ha)
2.2 Water (expected source & competing users)

unit: KLD
2.3 Minerals (MT)
2.4 Construction material – stone, aggregates, sand
/ soil (expected source – MT)
2.5 Forests and timber (source – MT)
2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels (source,
competing users) Unit: fuel (MT), energy (MW)
2.7 Any other natural resources (use appropriate
standard units)
4
3. Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or
materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise
concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health.

approximate
quantities/rates,
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No wherever possible) with
source of information
data
3.1 Use of substances or materials, which are

hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health
or the environment (flora, fauna, and
water supplies)
3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or affect disease
vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases)
3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by changing
living conditions?
3.4 Vulnerable groups of people who could be
affected by the project e.g. hospital patients,
children, the elderly etc.,
3.5 Any other causes
4. Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or

decommissioning (MT/month)

approximate
quantities/rates,
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No wherever possible) with
data
4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes

4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or commercial
wastes)
4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Waste
Management Rules)
4.4 Other industrial process wastes

4.5 Surplus product
4.6 Sewage sludge or other sludge from effluent
treatment
4.7 Construction or demolition wastes
4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment
5
approximate
quantities/rates,
data
4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials

4.10 Agricultural wastes
4.11 Other solid wastes
5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air

(kg/hr)

approximate
quantities/rates,
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No wherever possible) with
data
5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels from

stationary or mobile sources
5.2 Emissions from production processes
5.3 Emissions from materials handling including
storage or transport
5.4 Emissions from construction activities including
plant and equipment
5.5 Dust or odours from handling of materials
including construction materials, sewage and
waste
5.6 Emissions from incineration of waste
5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in open air (e.g.
slash materials, construction debris)
5.8 Emissions from any other sources
6
6. Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat:
S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with

approximate
quantities/rates, wherever
possible) with source of
information data with
source of information data
6.1 From operation of equipment e.g. engines,

ventilation plant, crushers
6.2 From industrial or similar processes
6.3 From construction or demolition
6.4 From blasting or piling
6.5 From construction or operational traffic
6.6 From lighting or cooling systems
6.7 From any other sources
7. Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into

the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the
sea:

approximate
quantities/rates,
data
7.1 From handling, storage, use or spillage of

hazardous materials
7.2 From discharge of sewage or other effluents to
water or the land (expected mode and place of
discharge)
7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted to air into
the land or into water
7.4 From any other sources
7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up of pollutants
in the environment from these sources?
7
8. Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which
could affect human health or the environment

approximate
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No possible) with source of
information data
8.1 From explosions, spillages, fires etc from

storage, handling, use or production of hazardous
substances
8.2 From any other causes
8.3 Could the project be affected by natural disasters
causing environmental damage (e.g. floods,
earthquakes, landslides, cloudburst etc)?
9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development)

which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts
with other existing or planned activities in the locality

approximate
S. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No
No.
possible) with source of
information data
9.1 Lead to development of supporting facilities,

ancillary development or development
stimulated by the project which could have
impact on the environment e.g.:
̇ Supporting infrastructure (roads, power
supply, waste or waste water treatment,
etc.)
̇ housing development
̇ extractive industries
̇ supply industries
̇ other
9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which could have an

impact on the environment
9.3 Set a precedent for later developments
9.4 Have cumulative effects due to proximity to
other existing or planned projects with similar
effects
8
(III) ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
S.No. Areas Name/ Aerial distance (within 15

km.)
Identity
Proposed project location
boundary
1 Areas protected under international conventions,

national or local legislation for their ecological,
landscape, cultural or other related value
2 Areas which are important or sensitive for
ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or
other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres,
mountains, forests
3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitive
species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting,
foraging, resting, over wintering, migration
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters

5 State, National boundaries
6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access
to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas
7 Defence installations
8 Densely populated or built-up area
9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses
(hospitals, schools, places of worship,
community facilities)
10 Areas containing important, high quality or
scarce resources (ground water resources,
surface resources, forestry, agriculture,
fisheries, tourism, minerals)
11 Areas already subjected to pollution or
environmental damage. (those where existing
legal environmental standards are exceeded)
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could
cause the project to present environmental
problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides,
erosion, flooding or extreme or adverse climatic
conditions)
9
(IV) PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIA STUDIES
“I hereby given undertaking that the data and information given in the application and
enclosure are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I am aware that if any
part of the data and information submitted is found to be false or misleading at any
stage, the project will be rejected and clearance give, if any to the project will be
revoked at our risk and cost.
Date:______________
Place:______________
Signature of the applicant
With Name and Full Address
(Project Proponent / Authorized Signatory)
NOTE:
1. The projects involving clearance under Coastal Regulation Zone
Notification, 1991 shall submit with the application a C.R.Z. map duly
demarcated by one of the authorized, agencies, showing the project
activities, w.r.t. C.R.Z. and the recommendations of the State Coastal Zone
Management Authority. Simultaneous action shall also be taken to obtain
the requisite clearance under the provisions of the C.R.Z. Notification,
1991 for the activities to be located in the CRZ.
2. The projects to be located within 10km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries,
Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project
proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife
Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project location and the
recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden thereon.”
10
ANNEXURE VI
Critically Polluted Industrial Areas and Clusters/Potential Impact
Zones
Table 1: Details of Critically Polluted Industrial Areas and Clusters / Potential Impact Zone
(Ref: Office Memorandum No. J-11013/5/2010-IA.II(I) Dated 13.1.2010)
S. No. Critically Polluted Industrial Industrial Clusters/ Potential Impact Zones

Area and CEPI
1. Ankeshwar (Gujarat) ̇ GIDC Ankeshwar and GIDC, Panoli

CEPI-88.50(Ac_Wc_Lc)
2 Vapi (Gujarat) ̇ GIDC Vapi
CEPI-88.09(Ac_Wc_Lc)
3 Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh) Sub-cluster A
CEPI-87.37(Ac_Wc_Lc) ̇ Mohan nagar industrial area
̇ Rajinder nagar industrial area
̇ Sahibabad industrial area
Sub-cluster B
̇ Pandav nagar industrial area
̇ Kavi nagar industrial area
̇ Bulandshahar road industrial area
̇ Amrit nagar
̇ Aryanagar industrial area
Sub-cluster C
̇ Merrut road industrial are
Sub-cluster D
̇ Loni industrial area
̇ Loni Road industrial area
̇ Roop nagar industrial area
Sub-cluster E
̇ Hapur Road industrial area
̇ Dasna
̇ Philkura
Sub-cluster F (Other scattered industrial areas)
̇ South side of GT road
̇ Kavi Nagar
̇ Tronica city
̇ Anand Nagar
̇ Jindal Nagar
̇ Prakash Nagar
̇ Rural industrial estate
4 Chandrapur ̇ Chandrapur (MIDC Chandrapur, Tadali, Ghuggus,
Ballapur)
(Maharashtra)
CEPI-83.88 (Ac_Wc_Lc)
5 Kobra (Chhatisgarh) ̇ Industrial areas and their townships of NTPC, BALCO,
CEPI-83.00 (Ac_Ws_Lc) CSEB (East) & CSEB (West)
̇ Korba town
6 Bhiwadi (Rajasthan) ̇ RIICO industrial areas Phase I to IV
CEPI-82.91 (Ac_Wc_Ls) ̇ Bhiwadi town
̇ Other surrounding industrial areas: Chopanki, Rampura
Mundana, Khuskhera Phase I to III
7 Angul Talcer(Orissa) ̇ MCL Coal mining area, Augul – Talcer region
CEPI-82.09 (Ac_Wc_Lc) ̇ Industrial area (60 km x 45 km)
Following blocks of Augul district:
̇ Kohina block
̇ Talcher block
i
Area and CEPI
̇ Angul block
̇ Chhendipada block
̇ Banarpal block
̇ Odapada block of Dhenkamal district
8 Vellore (North Arcot) (Tamil ̇ Ranipet, SIPCOT industrial complex
Nadu)
CEPI-81.79 (Ac_Wc_Lc)
9 Singrauli (Uttar Pradesh) Sonebhadra (UP)
CEPI-81.73 (Ac_Wc_Ls) ̇ Dala-Tola
̇ Obra
̇ Renukoot
̇ Anpara
̇ Renusagar
̇ Kakri
̇ Dudhichuwa
̇ Bina
̇ Khadia
̇ Shakti nagar
̇ Rihand nagar
̇ Bijpur
Sigrauli (Madhya Pradesh)
Vindhyachal nagar and Jaynat, Nigahi, Dudhichua, Amlohri &
Jhingurdah townships
10 Ludhiana (Punjab) Ludhiana municipal limits covering industrial clusters:
CEPI-81.66 (Ac_Wc_Ls) ̇ Focal point along with NH-I- Total eight phase
̇ Industrial area-B- from sherpur chowk to Gill road & Gill
road to Miller Kotla road (left side of road)
̇ Mixed industrial area – right side of Gill road
̇ Industrial area –C (near Juglana village)
̇ Industrial area A & extension: area between old GT road
and Ludhiana bypass road
̇ Industrial estate: near Dholwal chowk
̇ Mixes industrial area (MIA) Miller gunj
̇ MIA – bypass road
̇ Bahdur industrial area
̇ Tejpur industrial complex
11 Nazafgarh drain basin, Delhi ̇ Industrial areas: Anand Parvat, Naraina, Okhla and
Wazirpur
CEPI-79.54 (As_Wc_Lc)
12 Noida (Uttar Pradesh) Territorial Jurisdiction of:
CEPI-78.90 (Ac_Wc_Lc) ̇ Noida Phase-1
̇ Noida Phase-2
̇ Noida Phase-3
̇ Surajpur industrial area
̇ Greater Noida industrial area
̇ Village- Chhaparaula
13 Dhanbad (Jharkhand) Four blocks of Dhanbad district:
CEPI-78.63 (Ac_Ws_Lc) ̇ Sadar (Dhanbad Municipality)
̇ Jharia (Jharia Municipality, Sindri industrial area)
̇ Govindpur (Govindpur industrial estate)
̇ Nirsa
ii
Area and CEPI
14 Dombivalli (Maharashtra) ̇ MIDC Phase- I, Phase- II

CEPI-78.41 (Ac_Wc_Ls)
15 Kanpur (Uttar Pradesh) Industrial areas:
CEPI-78.09 (Ac_Wc_Ls) ̇ Dada nagar
̇ Panki
̇ Fazalganj
̇ Vijay nagar
̇ Jajmau
16 Cuddalore (Tamil Nadu) ̇ SIPCOT industrial complex, Phase I & II
CEPI-77.45 (As_Wc_Lc)
17 Aurangabad (Maharashtra) ̇ MIDC Chikhalthana, MIDC Waluj, MIDC Shendra, and
CEPI-77.44 (Ac_Wc_Ls) Paithan road industrial area
18 Faridabad (Haryana) ̇ Sector 27-A, B, C, D

CEPI-77.07 (Ac_Ws_Lc) ̇ DLF phase- 1, sector 31,32
̇ DLF phase- 2, sector 35
̇ Sector 4, 6, 24, 27, 31, 59
̇ Industrial area Hatin
̇ Industrial model township
19 Agra (Uttar Pradesh) ̇ Nunihai industrial estate, Rambag nagar, UPSIDC
CEPI-76.48 (As_Wc_Ls) industrial area, and Runukata industrial area
20 Manali (Tamil Nadu) ̇ Manali industrial area

CEPI-76.32 (Ac_Ws_Ls)
21 Haldia (West Bengal) ̇ 5 km wide strip (17.4 x 5.0 km) of industrial area on the
CEPI-75.43 (As_Wc_Ls) southern side of the confluence point of Rivers Hugli and
Rupnarayan, covering
̇ Haldia municipal area & Sutahata block – I and II
22 Ahmedabad (Gujarat) ̇ GIDC Odhav
CEPI-75.28 (Ac_Ws_Ls) ̇ GIDC Naroda
23 Jodhpur (Rajasthan) ̇ Industrial areas including Basni areas (phase-I & II),
CEPI-75.19 (As_Wc_Ls) industrial estate, light & heavy industrial areas, industrial
areas behind new power house, Mandore, Bornada,
Sangariya and village Tanwada & Salawas.
̇ Jodhpur city
24 Greater Cochin (Kerala) ̇ Eloor-Edayar industrial belt,
CEPI-75.08 (As_Wc_Ls) ̇ Ambala Mogal industrial areas
25 Mandi Gobind Garh (Punjab) ̇ Mandi Govindgarh municipal limit and khanna area
CEPI-75.08 (Ac_Ws_Lc)
26 Howrah (West Bengal) ̇ Liluah-Bamangachhi region, Howrah
CEPI-74.84 (As_Ws_Lc) ̇ Jalan industrial complex-1, Howrah
27 Vatva (Gujarat) ̇ GIDC Vatva, Narol industrial area (Villages Piplaj,

Shahwadi, Narol)
CEPI-74.77 (Ac_Wc_Ls)
28 Ib Valley (Orissa) ̇ Ib Valley of Jharsuguda (Industrial and mining area)

29 Varansi-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh) ̇ Industrial estate, Mirzapur
CEPI-73.79 (As_Wc_Ls) ̇ Chunar
̇ Industrial estate, Chandpur, Varansi
iii
Area and CEPI
̇ UPSIC, industrial estate, Phoolpur
̇ Industrial area, Ramnagar, Chandauli
30 Navi Mumbai (Maharashtra) ̇ TTC industrial area, MIDC, Navi Mumbai (including
Bocks-D, C, EL, A, R, General, Kalva)
31 Pali (Rajasthan) ̇ Existing industrial areas: Mandia road, Puniyata road,
CEPI-73.73 (As_Wc_Ls) Sumerpur
̇ Pali town
32 Mangalore (Karnataka) ̇ Baikampady industrial area
33 Jharsuguda (Orissa) ̇ Ib valley of Jharsuguda (Industrial and mining area)
34 Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu) ̇ SIDCO, Kurichi industrial Clusters
CEPI-72.38 (Ac_Ws_Ln)
35 Bhadravati (Karnataka) ̇ KSSIDC Industrial area, Mysore paper mill & VISL
township complex
CEPI-72.33 (Ac_Ws_Ln)
36 Tarapur (Maharashtra) ̇ MIDC Tarapur
37 Panipat (Haryana) ̇ Panipat municipal limit and its industrial clusters
CEPI-71.91 (As_Ws_Ls)
38 Indore (Madhya Pradesh) Following 09 industrial area:
CEPI-71.26 (As_Ws_Ls) ̇ Sanwer road
̇ Shivaji nagar
̇ Pologround
̇ Laxmibai nagar
̇ Scheme no.71
̇ Navlakha
̇ Pipliya
̇ Palda
̇ Rau
Indore city
Other surrounding industrial areas: Manglia, Rajoda, Asrawad,
Tejpur Gadwadi
39 Bhavnagar (Gujarat) ̇ GIDI Chitra, Bhavnagar
40 Vishakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) ̇ Bowl area (the area between Yarada hill range in the south
CEPI-70.82 (As_Ws_Ls) to Simhachalam hill range in the north and sea on the east
and the present NH-5 in the west direction)
41 Junagarh (Gujarat) Industrial areas:
CEPI-70.82 (As_Ws_Ls) ̇ Sabalpur
̇ Jay Bhavani
̇ Jay Bhuvneshwari
̇ GIDC Junagarh (I&II)
42 Asansole (West Bengal) ̇ Bumpur area surrounding IISCO
43 Patancheru - Bollaram Industrial area:
(Andhra Pradesh) ̇ Patancheru
̇ Bollaram
iv
Area and CEPI
Note:
Names of identified industrial clusters/potential impact zones are approximate location based on rapid
survey and assessment and may alter partially subject to the detailed field study and monitoring.
Detailed mapping will be made available showing spatial boundaries of the identified industrial
clusters including zone of influence/ buffer zone, after in depth field study.
v
ANNEXURE VII
Pre-Feasibility Report: Points for Possible Coverage
Table 1: Points for Possible Coverage in Pre-feasibility Report
S. No. Contents Points of Coverage in Pre-feasibility Report
I. Executive summary § A miniature report of entire pre-feasibility report.
II. Project Details

Need/Justification of the Project § Current demand scenario of the petrochemical products
(base/primary materials - Hydrocarbons)
§ Alternatives to meet the demand
§ Post project scenario on residual demand, etc.
Capacity of the Petrochemical § Production capacity of the industry
Industry § Sustainability of raw material supply and quality
§ Optimization of plant capacity, etc.
Process technology § Analysis of available/advanced technologies, etc.

§ Analysis of various possible configurations for each
technology or a combination of these technologies from
available manufactures
§ Broad specifications for the proposed industrial units
Resources/raw materials § Details on raw material (naphtha, natural gas), co-
products/byproducts
§ Water
- Water requirement for process, utilities, domestic,
gardening etc.
- Source of construction water and potable water
- Source of circulating/consumptive water
- Quality of raw water, treated water
- Water budget calculations and effluent generation
- Approved water allocation quota (drinking,
irrigation and industrial use) and surplus
availability
- Feasible ways of bringing water to site indicating
constraints if any.
- Lean season water availability and allocation
source in case main source not perennial.
§ Manpower
§ Infrastructure
§ Electrical power
§ Construction material like sand, brick, stone chips,
borrow earth etc.
Rejects (Pollution potential) § Air emissions (VOCs, particulates, NOx, SOx, etc.)
§ Water pollution (cooling water, process water, etc.)
§ Solid / hazardous waste
§ Noise
§ Odour
Technical profile § Construction details
- Estimated duration
- Number of construction workers including
migrating workers
- Construction equipment
- Vehicular traffic
- Source, mode of transportation and storage of
construction material
§ Traffic that would arise during different phases of the
project and transportation mechanism to handle such
traffic
ii
§ New facilities needed

§ Technical parameters of the plant & equipments to be
used
§ Product storage and associated transportation system
§ Product demand & supply position data on regional
basis, etc.
Project schedule § Project implementation schedule
Future prospects § Ascertain the costs and benefits of the proposed project
for project life
§ Technical and logistic constraints/ requirements of
project sustainability, etc.
III. Selection of site based on least possible impacts
i. Choice of site selection
Major techno-economic § Land availability & its development
feasibility considerations § Product demand around the selected site
§ Access to site for transportation of equipments/
construction machinery, material, etc.
§ Raw material availability and its transportation
§ Water availability and consumptive use
§ Product transportation
§ Infrastructure availability at selected site
§ Inter-state issue, if any, etc.
Incompatible landuse and § If any incompatible land-use attributes fall within the
ecologically sensitive attributes study area, the following details has to be provided:
with respect to identified - Public water supply areas from rivers/surface
suitable sites water bodies, from groundwater
- Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts
- Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over
10 lakh pilgrims a year
- Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas
where industrial activity is not permitted); CRZ
- Monuments of national significance, World
Heritage Sites
- Cyclone, Tsunami prone areas (based on last 25
years);
- Airport areas
- Any other feature as specified by the State or local
government and other features as locally
applicable, including prime agricultural lands,
pastures, migratory corridors, etc.
§ If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study
area, please give details. Ecologically sensitive
attributes include
- National parks
- Wild life sanctuaries
- Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting
ground
- Mangrove area
- Tropical forests
- Important lakes
- Endangered species of flora and fauna, etc.
Social aspects § Corporate social responsibilities
§ Employments and infrastructure added in the vicinity of
the plant
§ Status of land availability, current and post project land
iii
use variation
§ Social sensitivity and likely project affected people, etc.
ii. Details of selected site
Land details § Land requirement and availability
§ Land ownership details such as Government, private,
tribal, non-tribal, etc.
§ Total area of the project/site
§ Prevailing land cost details, etc.
Location § Geographical details - Longitude & latitude, village,
taluka, district, state
§ Approach to site – roads, railways and airports
§ Distance from nearest residential and industrial areas
§ Distance from nearest water bodies such as river, canal,
dam, etc
§ Distance from ecologically sensitive areas
§ In case of flood prone areas, HFL of the site
§ In case of seismic areas, seismic zone, active faults,
occurrence on earthquakes, etc.
§ Proximity from infrastructural facilities, etc.
Physical characteristics § Demography
§ Meteorological data
§ Landuse pattern such as agricultural, barren, forest, etc.
and details thereof
§ Topography of the area
§ Drainage patterns
§ Soil condition and soil investigation results
§ Ground profile and levels, etc.
IV. Anticipated impacts based on § Population
project operations on § Flora and fauna
receiving environment § Water
§ Soil
§ Air
§ Climate
§ Landscape, etc.
V. Proposed broad mitigation § Preventive measures
measures which could § Source control measures
effectively be internalized as § Mitigation measures at the receiving environment
project components to have § Health and safety measures, etc.
environmental and social
acceptance of the proposed
site
VI. An indication of any difficulties (technical deficiencies or lack of know-how) encountered by
the developer in compiling the required information.
The above listing is not exhaustive. Thus the proponent may provide additional necessary
information, felt appropriate, to include in the pre-feasibility study report in support of selecting
the site for the proposed developmental activities. The Concerned EAC/SEAC during scrutiny
may specifically ask for any additional information/data required to substantiate the requirement
to prescribe the ToR for EIA studies. However, it is to make clear that all the required further
information by EAC/SEAC may be mentioned in one single letter, within the prescribed time.
iv
ANNEXURE VIII
Types of Monitoring and Network Design Considerations
TYPES OF MONITORING AND NETWORK DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
A. Types of Monitoring
Monitoring refers to the collection of data using a series of repetitive measurements of
environmental parameters (or, more generally, to a process of systematic observation).
The environmental quality monitoring programme design will be dependent upon the
monitoring objectives specified for the selected area of interest. The main types of EIA
monitoring activities are:
§ Baseline monitoring is the measurement of environmental parameters during the pre-

project period for the purpose of determining the range of variation of the system and
establishing reference points against which changes can be measured. This leads to
the assessment of the possible (additional available) assimilative capacity of the
environmental components in pre-project period w.r.t. the standard or target level.
§ Effects monitoring is the measurement of environmental parameters during project
construction and implementation to detect changes which are attributable to the
project to provide the necessary information to:
− verify the accuracy of EIA predictions; and
− determine the effectiveness of measures to mitigate adverse effects of projects on
the environment.
− Feedback from environmental effect monitoring programs may be used to improve
the predictive capability of EIAs and also determine whether more or less stringent
mitigation measures are needed
§ Compliance monitoring is the periodic sampling or continuous measurement of
environmental parameters to ensure that regulatory requirements and standards are
being met.
Compliance and effects monitoring occurs during the project construction, operation, and
abandonment stages. The resources and institutional set-up should be available for the
monitoring at these stages. All large-scale construction projects will require some
construction stage monitoring. To control the environmental hazards of construction as
specified in the EIA, a monitoring program should be established to ensure that each
mitigation measure is effectively implemented. There are numerous potential areas for
monitoring during operations.
The scope of monitoring topics discussed in this chapter is limited to Baseline and Effects
monitoring. In addition, this chapter will also discuss the Compliance monitoring during
the construction phase. Post-project monitoring requirements are discussed in the EMP.
Before any field monitoring tasks are undertaken there are many institutional, scientific,
and fiscal issues that must be addressed in the implementation of an environmental
monitoring program. Careful consideration of these issues in the design and planning
stages will help avoid many of the pitfalls associated with environmental monitoring
programs. Although these issues are important but the discussions here are confined to the
monitoring network design component.
i
B. Network Design
Analysis of Significant Environmental Issues
At the outset of planning for an environmental monitoring network, the EIA manager may
not know exactly what should be monitored, when monitoring should begin, where it
should monitor, which techniques should be employed, and who should take
responsibility for its conduct. Because there are usually a number of objective decisions
associated with network design to be made, it is important to start with an analysis of
environmental issues. The scoping phase of an EIA is designed to identify and focus on
the major issues. Scoping should provide a valuable source of information on the
concerns that need to be addressed by the monitoring network design. These are project
specific as well as specific to the environmental setting of the location where the project
is proposed to be located
Hence, the network designs are associated with questions like:
§ What are the expected outputs of the monitoring activity?

§ Which problems do we need to address to? etc.
Defining the output will influence the design of the network and optimize the resources
used for monitoring. It will also ensure that the network is specially designed to optimize
the information on the problems at hand
What to Monitor?
The question of what to monitor is associated with the identification of VECs.
VECs are generally defined as environmental attributes or components of the

environment that are valued by society as identified during the scoping stage of the
project. They are determined on the basis of perceived public concerns. For example,
changes to water quality and quantity could have implications on fish by affecting habitat,
food supply, oxygen, and contaminant uptake. Similarly, employment and business, and
economies are both VECs that serve as pathways.
The choice of VECs is also related to the perceived significant impact of the project
implementation on important environmental components. In general, the significance or
importance of environmental components is judged based on:
§ legal protection provided (for example, rare and endangered species)

§ political or public concerns (for example, resource use conflicts and sustainable
development)
§ scientific judgment (for example, ecological importance); or
§ commercial or economic importance
However, in addition to their economic, social, political or ecological significance, the
chosen VEC should also have unambiguous operational ease, be accessible to prediction
and measurement; and be susceptible to hazard. Once the VECs are defined, the VECs
may be directly measured (for example, extent of habitat for an endangered species). In
cases where it is impossible or impractical to directly measure the VECs, the chosen
measurement endpoints or environmental indicators must correspond to, or be predictive
of assessment endpoints.
The chosen environmental indicators must be: 1) measurable; 2) appropriate to the scale
of disturbance/ contamination; 3) appropriate to the impact mechanism; 4) appropriate
ii
and proportional to temporal dynamics; 5) diagnostic; and 6) standardized; as well as
have: 1) a low natural variability; 2) a broad applicability; and 3) an existing data series.
Where, How and How Many Times to Monitor?
These are the other components of Monitoring Network Design. These questions are best
answered based on local field conditions, capacity and resources available, prevailing
legal and regulatory priorities, etc. For this screening or reconnaissance Surveys of the
study area also necessary. This may also include some simple inexpensive measurements
and assimilative/dispersion modeling. The data will give some information on the
prevailing special and temporal variations, and the general background air pollution in the
area. The number of monitoring stations and the indicators to be measured at each station
in the final permanent network may then be decided upon based on the results of the
screening study as well as on the knowledge of the sources of the proposed development
and prevailing local environmental/meteorological conditions. The best possible
definition of the air pollution problem, together with the analysis of the resources:
personnel, budget and equipment available, represent the basis for the decision on the
following questions:
§ What spatial density (number) of sampling stations is required? How many samples
are needed and during what period (sampling (averaging) time and frequency)?
§ Where should the stations be located?
§ What kind of equipment should be used?
§ What additional background information is needed?
− meteorology
− topography
− population density
− emission sources and emission rates
− effects and impacts
§ How will the data be made available/communicated?
C. Site Selection
This normally means that for designing a monitoring programme in an (study) area which
might have an impact, several monitoring stations are needed for characterizing the
baseline conditions of the impacted area. When considering the location of individual
samplers, it is essential that the data collected are representative for the location and type
of area without the undue influence from the immediate surroundings. In any
measurement point in the study area the total ambient concentration is the representative
of:
§ natural background concentration

§ regional background
§ impact of existing large regional sources such as Industrial emissions and other power
plants
To obtain the information about the importance of these different contributions it is
therefore necessary to locate monitoring stations so that they are representative for
different impacts. In addition to the ambient pollution data, one would often need other
data governing the variations such as meteorological data for air pollution, to identify and
quantify the sources contributing to the measurements.. When considering the location of
individual samplers, it is essential that the data collected are representative for the
location and type of area without undue influence from the immediate surroundings.
iii
ANNEXURE IX
Guidance for Assessment of Baseline Components and Attributes
GUIDANCE FOR ASSESSMENT OF BASELINE COMPONENTS AND ATTRIBUTES*
Sampling
Attributes Measurement Method Remarks
Network Frequency
A. Air
Meteorological § Minimum 1 site in the § Min: 1 hrly § Mechanical / automatic § IS 5182 Part 1-20 Sit-
§ Wind speed project impact area observations from weather station specific primary data is
requirements continuous records § Rain gauge essential
§ Wind direction
§ As per IMD § Secondary data from IMD,
§ Dry bulb temperature
§ Other additional site(s) New Delhi for the nearest
§ Wet bulb temperature IMD station
are require depending
§ Relative humidity upon the model applied § As per IMD
§ Rainfall or site sensitivities
§ Solar radiation
§ Cloud cover
Pollutants § 10 to 15 locations in the § 24 hrly twice a week § Gravimetric (High – § Monitoring Network
§ SPM project impact area § 8 hrly twice a week Volume) § Minimum 2 locations in
§ 24 hrly twice a week § Gravimetric (High – upwind side, more sites in
§ PM10, PM2.5
Volume with Cyclone) downwind side / impact
§ SO2
§ EPA Modified West & zone
§ NO2
Gaeke method § All the sensitive receptors
§ CO need to be covered
§ Arsenite Modified Jacob &
§ H2S* Hochheiser § Measurement Methods
§ NH*3 § NDIR technique § As per CPCB standards for
§ HC* § Methylene-blue NAQM, 1994
§ Fluoride* § Nessler’s Method
§ Pb* § Infra Red analyzer
§ VOC-PAH* § Specific lon meter
§ Ozone § TOEM
§ Benzene § Beta attenuation
§ Benzo(a)pyrene (Particulate § UV photometric
phase only)
§ Chemilminescence
§ Arsenic
§ Chemical method
§ Nickel
§ Gas chromatography based
(parameters to be proposed by the continuos analyzer
proponent, in draft ToR, which will § Adsorption and desorption
be reviewed and approved by followed by GC analysis
i
Sampling
Network Frequency
EAC/SEAC) § Solvent extraction
folllowed by HPLC/GC
analysis
§ AAS/ICP method after
sampling on EPM 2000 or
equivalent filter paper
B. Noise
Hourly equivalent noise levels § Same as for Air § At lest one day § Instrument : Sensitive § Min: IS: 4954- 1968 as
Pollution along with continuous in each Noise level meter adopted by CPCB
others Identified in season on a working (preferably recording type)
study area and non-working day
Hourly equivalent noise levels § Inplant (1.5 m from § Same as above for day § Instrument : Noise level § CPCB / OSHA
machinery or high and night metre
emission processes)
Hourly equivalent noise levels § Highways (within 500 § Same as above for day § Instrument : Noise level § CPCB / IS : 4954-1968
metres from the road and night meter
edge)
Peak particle velocity § 150- 200m from blast § Based on hourly § PPV meter §
site observations
C. Water
Parameters for water quality § Set of grab samples § Diurnal and season- § Samples for water quality
during pre and post- wise should be collected and
§ Ph, temp, turbidity, magnesium
monsoon for ground and analyzed as per:
hardness, total alkalinity,
surface water for the § IS: 2488 (Part 1-5)
chloride, sulphate, nitrate,
whole study zone. For methods for sampling and
fluoride, sodium, potassium
salinity lab analysis the samples testing of industrial
should be preserved for effluents
§ Total nitrogen, total
transport safe § Standard methods for
phosphorus, DO, BOD, COD,
Phenol examination of water and
waste water analysis
§ Heavy metals
published by American
§ Total coliforms, faecal
Public Health Association.
coliforms
§ International standard
§ Phyto plankton
practices for benthos and
§ Zooplankton
ii
Sampling
Network Frequency
§ Fish & other aquatic flora & aquatic flora & fauna
fauna
(parameters are given in ToR for
EIA studies based on nature of
project, raw material & process
technology, location-
nature/activities within of air basin)
For Surface Water Bodies
§ Total Carbon § Monitoring locations § Yield & impact on § Samples for water quality § Historical data should be
§ PH should include up- water sources to be should be collected and collected from relevant
§ Dissolved Oxygen stream, on site, down measured during analyzed as per: offices such as central
§ Biological Oxygen stream of proposed critical season § IS: 2488 (Part 1-5) water commission, state
§ Demand discharge point. Besides § River Stretch within methods for sampling and and central ground water
sampling should cover project area be divided testing of industrial board, Irrigation dept.
§ Free NH4
width of the river in case in grids (say 1 km effluents §
§ Boron
water quality modeling length and 1/3 width) § Standard methods for
§ Sodium Absorption ratio is proposed. and samples should be examination of water and
§ Electrical Conductivity § Standard methodology from each grid at a time wastewater analysis
for collection of surface when the wastewater published by American
water (BIS standards) discharged by other Public Health Association.
§ At least one grab sample sources of pollution is §
per location per season expected to be §
maximum
Parameters for wastewater characterization
§ Temp, colour, odour, turbidity, § Implant Source § Different operational § Samples for water quality All plant sources categorized
TSS, TDS depending upon the cycles as well as raw should be collected and as:
§ PH , alkalinity as CaCO3, p different waste streams material variations analyzed as per:
§ Different Process waste
value, M value, tatal hardness the parameters can be should be reflected in § IS: 2488 (Part 1-5) streams as well as run-off
as CaCO3, chloride as cl, optimized the analysis methods for sampling and conditions
sulphate as S04, Nitrate as § Grab and composite testing of industrial
§ ETP wastewater
NO3, Floride as F, Phosphate sampling representing effluents
§ Domestic/ sanitary
as P04, Chromium as Cr avg of different process § Standard methods for wastewater
(Hexavalent, total) Ammonical operations as well as examination of water and
Nitrogen as N, TKN, % worst emission scenario wastewater analysis
sodium, BOD at 20 C, COD, should be represented published by American
iii
Sampling
Network Frequency
DO, total residual chlorine as Public Health Association.
Cl2, oil and grease, sulphide,
phenolic compound
D. Land Environment
§ Soil § One surface sample § Season-wise § Collected and analyzed as § The purpose of impact
§ Particle size distribution from each landfill and/or per soil analysis reference assessment on soil (land
§ Texture hazardous waste site (if book, M.I.Jackson and soil environment) is to assess
§ pH applicable) and prime analysis reference book by the significant impacts due
§ Electrical conductivity villages, (soil samples C.A. Black to leaching of wastes or
be collected as per BIS § accidental releases and
§ Caution exchange capacity
specifications) in the contaminating
§ Alkali metals
study area §
§ Sodium Absorption Ratio
(SAR)
§ Permeability
§ Porosity
Landuse / Landscape
§ Location code § At least 20 points along § Drainage once in the § Global positioning system § Drainage within the plant
§ Total project area with plant boundary and study period and land § Topo-sheets area and surrounding is
§ Topography general major land use use categories from § Satellite Imageries very important for storm
§ Drainage (natural) categories in the study secondary data (local (1:25,000) water impacts.
§ Cultivated, forest plantations, area. maps) and satellite § From land use maps
water bodies, roads and imageries sensitive receptors (forests,
settlements parks, mangroves etc.) can
be identified
iv
Sampling
Network Frequency
E. Solid Waste
Quantity: § For green field unites it § Process wise or Guidelines
§ Based on waste generated from is based on secondary activity wise for § IS 9569 : 1980
per unit production data base of earlier respective raw material
§ IS 10447 : 1983
§ Per capita contribution plants. used. Domestic waste
depends upon the § IS 12625 : 1989
§ Collection, transport and
season also § IS 12647 : 1989
disposal system
§ IS 12662 (PTI) 1989
§ Process Waste
§ Quality (oily, chemical,
biological)
Quality: § Grab and Composite § Process wise or activity Analysis
§ General segregation into samples wise for respective raw § IS 9334 : 1979
biological/organic/inert/hazard material used.
§ IS 9235 : 1979
ous Domestic waste
depends upon the § IS 10158 : 1982
§ Loss on heating
§ pH season also
§ Electrical Conductivity
§ Calorific value, metals etc.
Hazardous Waste
§ Permeability And porosity § Grab and Composite § Process wise or activity Analysis § Impacts of hazardous
§ Moisture pH samples. Recyclable wise for respective raw waste should be performed
§ IS 9334 : 1979
§ Electrical conductivity components have to material used. critically depending on the
§ IS 9235 : 1979
§ Loss on ignition analyzed for the waste characteristics and
recycling requirements § IS 10158 : 1982 place of discharge. For
§ Phosphorous
land disposal the guidelines
§ Total nitrogen
should be followed and
§ Caution exchange capacity
impacts of accidental
§ Particle size distribution releases should be assessed
§ Heavy metal
§ Ansonia
§ Fluoride
F. Biological Environment Aquatic
§ Primary productivity § Considering probable § Season changes are § Standards techniques § Seasonal sampling for
§ Aquatic weeds impact, sampling points very important (APHA et. Al. 1995, Rau aquatic biota
v
Sampling
Network Frequency
§ Enumeration of and number of samples and Wooten 1980) to be § One season for terrestrial
§ phytoplankton, zooplankton to be decided on followed for sampling and biota, in addition to
and benthos established guidelines measurement vegetation studies during
§ Fisheries on ecological studies monsoon season
§ Diversity indices based on site eco- § Preliminary assessment
environment setting § Microscopic analysis of
§ Trophic levels
within 10/25 km radius plankton and meiobenthos,
§ Rare and endangered species
from the proposed site studies of macrofauna,
§ Sanctuaries / closed areas /
§ Samples to collect from aquatic vegetation and
Coastal regulation zone (CRZ)
upstream and application of indices, viz.
§ Terrestrial downstream of Shannon, similarity,
§ Vegetation – species, list, discharge point, nearby dominance IVI etc
economic importance, forest tributaries at down
produce, medicinal value § Point quarter plot-less
stream, and also from method (random sampling)
§ Importance value index (IVI) dug wells close to for terrestrial vegetation
of trees activity site survey.
§ Wild animals
Avifauna § For forest studies, § Secondary data to collect
§ Rare and endangered species chronic as well as short- from Government offices,
§ Sanctuaries / National park / term impacts should be NGOs, published literature
Biosphere reserve analyzed warranting § Plankton net
data on micro climate § Sediment dredge
conditions § Depth sampler
§ Microscope
§ Field binocular
G. Socio Economic
§ Demographic structure § Socio-economic survey § Different impacts § Primary data collection § Secondary data from
§ Infrastructure resource base is based on occurs during through R&R surveys (if census records, statistical
§ Economic resource base proportionate, stratified construction and require) or community hard books, toposheets,
§ Health status: Morbidity and random sampling operational phases of survey are based on health records and relevant
pattern method the project personal interviews and official records available
§ Cultural and aesthetic attributes questionnaire with Govt. agencies
* Project Specific concerned parameters needs to be identified by the project proponent and shall be incorporated in the draft ToR, to be submitted to the Authority for the
consideration and approval by the EAC/SEAC.
vi
ANNEXURE X
Sources of Secondary Data
Annexure XA: Potential Sources of Data For EIA
Information Source
Air Environment
1. Meteorology- Temperature, Rainfall, Humidity, Indian Meteorology Department, Pune
Inversion, Seasonal Wind rose pattern (16 point
compass scale), cloud cover, wind speed, wind
direction, stability, mixing depth
2. Ambient Air Quality- 24 hourly concentration of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB),
SPM, RPM, SO2, NOx, CO State Pollution Control Board (SPCB),
Municipal Corporations
Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF)
State Department of Environment (DoEN)
Water Environment
3. Surface water- water sources, water flow (lean Central Water Commission (CWC),
season), water quality, water usage, Downstream Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB),
water users State Pollution Control Board (SPCB), Central Water
Command area development plan and Power Research Institute (CWPRS), Pune
Catchment treatment plan State Irrigation Department
Hydel Power generation organizations such as
NHPC, State SEBs
4. Ground Water- groundwater recharge Central Ground Water Board (CGWB)
rate/withdrawal rate, ground water potential Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA)
groundwater levels (pre monsoon, post monsoon), State Ground Water Board (SGWB)
ground water quality, changes observed in quality National Water Development Authority (NWDA)
and quantity of ground water in last 15 years
5. Coastal waters- water quality, tide and current data, Department of Ocean Development, New Delhi
bathymetry State Maritime Boards
Naval Hydrographer’s Office, Dehradun
Port Authorities
National Institute of Oceanography (NIO), Goa
Biological Environment
6. Description of Biological Environment- inventory District Gazetteers
of flora and fauna in 7 km radius, endemic species, National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA),
endangered species, Aquatic Fauna, Forest land, Hyderabad
forest type and density of vegetation, biosphere, Forest Survey of India, Dehradun
national parks, wild life sanctuaries, tiger reserve, Wildlife Institute of India
elephant reserve, turtle nesting ground, core zone World Wildlife Fund
of biosphere reserve, habitat of migratory birds, Zoological Survey of India
routes of migratory birds Botanical Survey of India
Bombay Natural History Society, (BNHS), Mumbai
State Forest Departments
State Fisheries Department
Ministry of Environment and Forests
State Agriculture Departments
State Agriculture Universities
Land Environment
7. Geographical Information-Latitude, Longitude, Toposheets of Survey of India, Pune
Elevation ( above MSL) National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA),
Hyderabad
Space Application Centre (SAC), Ahmedabad
REPORT ON SECONDARY DATA COLLECTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTRE 1

Information Source
8. Nature of Terrain, topography map indicating Survey of India Toposheets
contours (1:2500 scale) National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA),
Hyderabad
State Remote Sensing Centre,
Space Application Centre (SAC), Ahmedabad
9. Hydrogeology- Hydrogeological report (in case of NRSA, Hyderbad
ground water is used/area is drought Survey of India Toposheets
prone/wastewater is likely to discharged on land) Geological Survey of India
Geomorphological analysis (topography and State Geology Departments
drainage pattern) State Irrigation Department
Geological analysis (Geological Department of Wasteland Development, Ministry of
Formations/Disturbances- geological and structural Rural Areas
maps, geomorphological contour maps, structural National Water Development Authority (NWDA)
features, including lineaments, fractures, faults and
joints)
Hydrogeological analysis (disposition of permeable
formations, surface-ground water links, hydraulic
parameter determination etc)
Analysis of the natural soil and water to assess
pollutant absorption capacity
10. Nature of Soil, permeability, erodibility Agriculture Universities
classification of the land State Agriculture Department
Indian Council for Agriculture Research
State Soil Conservation Departments
National Bureau of Soil Survey and Landuse Planning
Central Arid Zone Research Institute (CAZRI),
Jodhpur
11. Landuse in the project area and 10 km radius of the Survey of India- Toposheets
periphery of the project All India Soil and Landuse Survey; Delhi
National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA),
Hyderabad
Town and County Planning Organisation
State Urban Planning Department
Regional Planning Authorities (existing and proposed
plans)
Village Revenue Map- District Collectorate
Directorate of Economics and Statistics-State
Government
Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad
12. Coastal Regulation Zones- CRZMP, CRZ Urban Development Department

classification, Demarcation of HTL and LTL State Department of Environment
State Pollution Control Board
Space Application Centre*
Centre for Earth Sciences Studies,
Thiruvanthapuram*
Institute of Remote Sensing, Anna University
Chennai*
Naval Hydrographer’s Office, Dehradun*
National Institute of Oceanography, Goa*
National Institute of Ocean Technology, Chennai
Centre for Earth Science Studies
Agencies authorized for approval of demarcation of HTL and LTL

Information Source
Social
13. Socioeconomic - population, number of houses Census Department
and present occupation pattern within 7 km from District Gazetteers- State Government
the periphery of the project District Statistics- District Collectorate
International Institute of Population Sciences,
Mumbai (limited data)
Central Statistical Organisation
14. Monuments and heritage sites District Gazetteer
Archeological Survey of India,
INTACH
District Collectorate
Central and State Tourism Department
State Tribal and Social Welfare Department
Natural Disasters
15. Seismic data (Mining Projects)- zone no, no of Indian Meteorology Department, Pune
earthquakes and scale, impacts on life, property Geological Survey of India
existing mines
16. Landslide prone zone, geomorphological Space Application Centre
conditions, degree of susceptibility to mass
movement, major landslide history (frequency of
occurrence/decade), area affected, population
affected
17. Flood/cyclone/droughts- frequency of occurrence Natural Disaster Management Division in

per decade, area affected, population affected Department of Agriculture and Cooperation
Indian Meteorological Department
Industrial
18. Industrial Estates/Clusters, Growth Centres State Industrial Corporation
Industrial Associations
State Pollution Control Boards
Confederation Indian Industries (CII)
FICCI
19. Physical and Chemical properties of raw material Material and Safety Data Sheets
and chemicals (Industrial projects); fuel quality ENVIS database of Industrial Toxicological Research
Centre, Lucknow
Indian Institute Petroleum
20. Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene- Central Labour Institute, Mumbai
major occupational health and safety hazards, Directorate of Industrial Safety
health and safety requirements, accident histories ENVIS Database of Industrial Toxicological Research
Centre, Lucknow
National Institute of Occupational Health,
Ahmedabad
21. Pollutant release inventories (Existing pollution Project proponents which have received EC and have
sources in area within 10 km radius) commenced operations
22. Water requirement (process, cooling water, DM EIA Reports

water, Dust suppression, drinking, green belt, fire National and International Benchmarks
service)

Annexure XB: Summary of Available Data with Potential Data Sources for EIA
Agency Information Available

1. Archaeological Survey of India Inventory of monuments and sites of national importance- Listing and
Department of Culture documentation of monuments according to world heritage, pre
Government of India historic, proto historic and secular, religious places and forts
Janpath, New Delhi - 110011
[email protected]
2. Botanical Survey Of India Photodiversity documentation of flora at National, State and District
P-8, Brabourne Road Calcutta level and flora of protected areas, hotspots, fragile ecosystems, sacred
700001 groves etc
Tel#033 2424922 Identification of threatened species including endemics, their
Fax#033 2429330 mapping, population studies
Email: [email protected]. . Database related to medicinal plants, rare and threatened plant species
Red data book of Indian plants (Vol 1,2, and 3)
RO - Coimbatore, Pune, Jodhpur, Manual for roadside and avenue plantation in India
Dehradun, Allahabad, Gantok,
Itanagar, Port Blair
3. Bureau of Indian Standards Bureau of Indian Standards Committees on Earthquake Engineering
Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadur Shah and Wind Engineering have a Seismic Zoning Map and the Wind
Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002 Velocity Map including cyclonic winds for the country
Tel#3230131, 3233375, 3239402 (10
lines)
Fax : 91 11 3234062, 3239399,
3239382
Email- [email protected]
4. Central Water Commission (CWC) Central Data Bank -Collection, collation and Publishing of
Sewa Bhawan, R.K.Puram Hydrological, Hydrometeorological, Sediment and Water Quality
New Delhi - 110066 data-.
[email protected] Basin wise Master Plans
Flood atlas for India
RO- Bangalore, Bhopal, Flood Management and Development and Operation of Flood
Bhubaneshwar, Chandigarh, Forecasting System- CWC operate a network of forecasting stations
Coimbatore/Chennai, Delhi, Over 6000 forecasts are issued every year with about 95% of the
Hyderabad, Lucknow, Nagpur, forecasts within the permissible limit.
Patna, Shillong, Siliguri and Water Year Books, Sediment Year Books and Water Quality Year
Vadodara Books.
Also actively involved in monitoring of 84 identified projects through
National, State and Project level Environmental Committees for
ensuring implementation of environmental safeguards
5. Central Ground Water Board surveys, exploration, monitoring of ground water development
(HO) N.H.IV, New CGO
Complex,
Faridabad - 121001
RO - Guwahati, Chandigarh,
Ahemadabad, Trivandrum,
Calcutta, Bhopal, Lucknow,
Banglore, Nagpur, Jammu,
Bhubneshwar, Raipur, Jaipur,
Chennai, Hyderabad, Patna
16
Based on web search and literature review

6. Central Pollution Control Board National Air Quality Monitoring Programme
Parivesh Bhawan, CBD-cum-Office National River Water Quality Monitoring Programme- Global
Complex Environment Monitoring , MINARS
East Arjun Nagar, DELHI - 110 032 Zoning Atlas Programme
INDIA Information on 17 polluting category industries (inventory, category
E-mail : [email protected] wise distribution, compliance, implementation of pollution control
programmes
7. Central Arid Zone Research AGRIS database on all aspects of agriculture from 1975 to date
Institute, Jodhpur Also have cell on Agriculture Research Information System;
Working on ENVIS project on desertification
Email : [email protected] Repository of information on the state of natural resources and
desertification processes and their control
Regional Centre at Bhuj in Gujarat The spectrum of activities involves researches on basic resource
inventories; monitoring of desertification, rehabilitation and
management of degraded lands and other areas
8. Central Inland Capture Fisheries Data Base on

Research Institute, Barrackpore- Ecology and fisheries of major river systems of India.
743101, Biological features of commercially important riverine and estuarine
Tel#033-5600177 fish species.
Fax#033-5600388 Production functions and their interactions in floodplain wetlands.
Email : [email protected] Activities - Environmental Impact Assessment for Resource
Management ; Fisheries Resource surveys
9. Central Institute of Brackish Water Repository of information on brackish water fishery resources with
Aquaculture systematic database of coastal fishery resources for ARIS
141, Marshalls Road, Egmore , Agricultural Research Information System (ARIS) database covers
Chennai - 600 008, State wise data on soil and water quality parameters, land use pattern,
Tel# 044-8554866, 8554891, production and productivity trends,
Director (Per) 8554851 Social, economic and environmental impacts of aquaculture farming,
Fax#8554851, Guidelines and effluent standards for aquaculture farming
10. Central Marine Fisheries Research Assessing and monitoring of exploited and un-exploited fish stocks in
Institute (CMFRI), Cochin Indian EEZ
Monitoring the health of the coastal ecosystems, particularly the
endangered ecosystems in relation to artisanal fishing, mechanised
fishing and marine pollution
The institute has been collecting data on the catch and effort and
biological characteristics for nearly half a century based on
scientifically developed sampling scheme, covering all the maritime
States of the country
The voluminous data available with the institute is managed by the
National Marine Living Resources Data Centre (NMLRDC)
11. Central Water and Power Research Numerical and Physical models for hydro-dynamic simulations
Station, Pune
Tel#020-4391801-14; 4392511;
4392825
Fax #020-4392004,4390189
12. Central Institute of Road Transport, Repository of data on all aspects of performance of STUs and a host
Bhosari, Pune of other related road transport parameters
411 026, India.
Tel : +91 (20) 7125177, 7125292,
7125493, 7125494

13. Department of Ocean Development Assessment of environment parameters and marine living resources
(primary and secondary) in Indian EEZ (Nodal Agency NIO Kochi)
Stock assessment, biology and resource mapping of deep sea shrimps,
lobsters and fishes in Indian EEZ (Nodal agency-Fisheries Survey of
India)
Investigations of toxical algal blooms and benthic productivity in
Indian EEZ (Nodal agency- Cochin University of Science and
technology)
Coastal Ocean Monitoring and Prediction System (COMAP) -
monitoring and modelling of marine pollution along entire Indian
coast and islands. Parameters monitored are temp, salinity, DO, pH,
SS, BOD, inorganic phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, total
phosphorus, total nitrite, total organic carbon, petroleum
hydrocarbons, pathogenic vibros, pathogenic E.coli, shigella,
salmonella, heavy metals (Cd, Hg, Pb) and pesticide residues (DDT,
BHC, Endosulfan). Monitoring is carried out along the ecologically
sensitive zones and urban areas (NIO Mumbai- Apex coordinating
agency).
Sea Level Measurement Programe (SELMAM)- sea level measurement
at selected stations (Porbandar, Bombay, Goa, Cochin, Tuticorin,
Madras, Machilipatnam, Visakhapatnam, Paradeep, Calcutta and
Kavaratti (Lakshadweep Island)) along Indian coast and islands using
modern tide gauges
Detailed coastal maps through Survey of India showing contour at 1/2
a metre interval in the scale of 1:25000. (Nellore- Machhalipatnam work
already over)
Marine Data Centre (MDC) IMD for Ocean surface meteorology,
GSI for marine geology, SOI for tide levels, Naval Hydrographic
Office for bathymetry, NIO Goa for physical chemical and biological
oceanography, NIO Mumbai for marine pollution, CMFRI for
coastal fisheries, Institute of Ocean Management Madras for coastal
geomorphology
DOD has setup Indian National Centre for Ocean Information
Services (INCOIS) at Hyderabad for generation and dissemination of
ocean data products (near real time data products such as sea surface
temperature, potential fishing zones, upwelling zones, maps, eddies,
chlorophyll, suspended sediment load etc). MDC will be integrated
with INCOIS
Integrated Coastal and Marine Area Management (ICMAM)
programme - GIS based information system for management of 11
critical habitats namely Pichavaram, Karwar, Gulf of Mannar, Gulf of
Khambat, Gulf of Kutch, Malvan, Cochin, Coringa mangroves,
Gahirmata, Sunderbans and Kadamat (Lakshadeep)
Wetland maps for Tamil Nadu and Kerala showing the locations of
lagoons, backwaters, estuaries, mudflats etc (1:50000 scale)
Coral Reef Maps for Gulf of Kachch, Gulf of Mannar, Andaman and
Nicobar and Lakshadeep Islands (1:50,000 scale) indicating the
condition of corals, density etc
14. Environment Protection Training Environment Information Centre- has appointed EPTRI as the
and Research Institute Distributed Information Centre for the Eastern Ghats region of India.
Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 019, EIC Collaborates with the Stockholm Environment Institute Sweden
India Phone: +91-40-3001241, Database on Economics of Industrial Pollution Prevention in India
3001242, 3000489 Database of Large and Medium Scale Industries of Andhra Pradesh
Fax: +91-40- 3000361 Environmental Status of the Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration
E-mail: [email protected] Study on ‘water pollution-health linkages’ for a few Districts of A.P

Environment Quality Mapping
Macro level studies for six districts in the State of Andhra Pradesh
Micro level studies for two study zones presenting the permissible
pollutant load and scoping for new industrial categories
Zonation of the IDA, Parwada which helped APIIC to promote the
land for industrial development
Disaster management plan for Visakhapatnam Industrial Bowl Area
15. Forest Survey of India (FSI) State of Forest Report (Biannual)

Kaulagarh Road, P.O., IPE National Forest Vegetation Map (Biannual exercise) (on 1: 1 million
Dehradun - 248 195 scale)
Tel# 0135-756139, 755037, 754507 Thematic mapping on 1:50,000 scale depicting the forest type, species
Fax # 91-135-759104 composition, crown density of forest cover and other landuse National
E-Mail : [email protected] Basic Forest Inventory System
[email protected] Inventory survey of non forest area
Forest inventory report providing details of area estimates,
RO- Banglore, Calcutta, Nagpur topographic description, health of forest, ownership pattern,
and Shimla estimation of volume and other growth parameters such as height and
diameter in different types of forest, estimation of growth,
regeneration and mortality of important species, volume equation and
wood consumption of the area studied
16. Geological Survey of India Environmental hazards zonation mapping in mineral sector
27 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Calcutta Codification of base line information of geo-environmental
700 016, India Telephone +91-33- appreciation of any terrain and related EIA and EMP studies
2496941 FAX 91-33-2496956 Lineament and geomorphological map of India on 1:20,000 scale.
[email protected] Photo-interpreted geological and structural maps of terrains with
limited field checks.
17. Indian Council of Agriculture A total of 80,000 profiles at 10 kms grid across the country were
Research, analyzed to characterize the soils of India.
Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, Detailed soil maps of the Country (1:7 million), State (1:250,000) and
Tel#011-338206 districts map (1:50,000) depicting extent of degradation (1:4.4 millions)
have been prepared.
Thematic maps depicting soil depth, texture drainage, calcareousness,
− ICAR complex, Goa- Agro salinity, pH, slope and erosion have been published
metrology Agro-climate characterization of the country based on moisture,
− Central Arid Zone Research thermal and sunshine regimes
Institute- Agro forestry Agro-ecological zones (20) and sub-zones (60) for the country were
− Central Soil salinity Research delineated based on physiography, soils, climate, Length of Growing
Institute, Period and Available Water Content, and mapped on 1:4.4 million
− Indian Institute of Soil Science scale.
− Central Soil and Water Digitization of physiography and soil resource base on 1:50,000 scale
Conservation Research and for 14 States have been completed.
Training Institute .Soil fertility maps of N,P,K,S and Zn have also been developed
− National Bureau of Soil Survey Water quality guidelines for irrigation and naturally occurring
and Landuse Planning saline/sodic water
Calibration and verification of ground water models for predicting
water logging and salinity hazards in irrigation commands
18. Indian Bureau of Mines National mineral inventory for 61 minerals and mineral maps
Indira Bhawan, Civil Lines Nagpur Studies on environmental protection and pollution control in regard
Ph no - 0712-533 631, to the mining and mineral beneficiation operations
Fax- 0712-533 041 Collection, processing and storage of data on mines, minerals and
mineral-based industries, collection and maintenance of world mineral
intelligence, foreign mineral legislation and other related matters

19. Indian Meteorology Department Meteorological data
Shivaji nagar, Pune 41100 Background air quality monitoring network under Global
Atmospheric Watch Programme (operates 10 stations)
RO- Mumbai, Chennai, Calcutta, Seismicity map, seismic zoning map; seismic occurrences and cyclone
New Delhi, Nagpur, Guwahati hazard monitoring; list of major earthquakes
Climatological Atlas of India , Rainfall Atlas of India and
Agroclimatic Atlas of India
Monthly bulletin of Climate Diagnostic Bulletin of India
Environmental Meteorological Unit of IMD at Delhi to provide
specific services to MoEF
20. INTACH Listing and documentation of heritage sites identified by
Natural Heritage, 71 Lodi Estate, New municipalities and local bodies (Listing excludes sites and buildings
Delhi-110 003 under the purview of the Archaeological Survey of India and the State
Departments of Archaeology)
Tel. 91-11-4645482, 4632267/9,
4631818, 4692774, 4641304 Fax : 91-
11-4611290
E-mail : [email protected]
21. Industrial Toxicology Research Activities include health survey on occupational diseases in industrial
Centre workers, air and water quality monitoring studies, ecotoxicological
Post Box No. 80, Mahatma Gandhi impact assessment, toxicity of chemicals, human health risk
Marg, Lucknow-226001, assessment
Phone: +91-522- Five databases on CD-ROM in the area of environmental toxicology
221856,213618,228227; Fax : +91- viz: TOXLINE, CHEMBANK, POISINDEX, POLTOX and
522 228227 PESTBANK. The Toxicology Information Centre provides
Email: [email protected] information on toxic chemicals including household chemicals
ENVIS centre and created a full-fledged computerized database
(DABTOC) on toxicity profiles of about 450 chemicals
22. Indian Institute of Forest Consultancy and research on joint forest management (Ford
Management Foundation, SIDA, GTZ, FAO etc)
Post Box No. 357, Nehru Nagar
Bhopal - 462 003
Phone # 0755-575716, 573799,
765125, 767851
Fax # 0755-572878
23. Indian Institute of Petroleum Fuel quality characterisation

Mohkampur , Dehradun, India, Emission factors
248005
0135- 660113 to 116
0135- 671986
24. Ministry of Environment and Survey of natural resources

Forest National river conservation directorate
Environmental research programme for eastern and western ghats
National natural resource management system
Wetlands conservation programme- survey, demarcation, mapping
landscape planning, hydrology for 20 identified wetlands National
wasteland identification programme
25. Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Mumbai Urban Transport Project

Development Authority Mumbai Urban Development Project
Mumbai Urban Rehabilitation Project
Information on MMR; statistics on councils and corporations Regional
Information Centre- Basic data on population, employment, industries
and other sectors are regularly collected and processed

26. Municipal Corporation of Greater Air Quality Data for Mumbai Municipal Area
Mumbai Water quality of lakes used for water supply to Mumbai
27. Ministry of Urban Development Identification of hazard prone area
Disaster Mitigation and Vulnerability Atlas showing areas vulnerable to natural disasters
Vulnerability Atlas of India Land-use zoning and design guidelines for improving hazard resistant
construction of buildings and housing
Building Materials & Technology State wise hazard maps (on cyclone, floods and earthquakes)
Promotion Council
G-Wing,Nirman Bhavan, New
Delhi-110011
Tel: 91-11-3019367
Fax: 91-11-3010145
E-Mail: [email protected]
28. Natural Disaster Management Weekly situation reports on recent disasters, reports on droughts,
Division in Department of floods, cyclones and earthquakes
Agriculture and Cooperation
29. National Bureau Of Soil Survey & NBSS&LUP Library has been identified as sub centre of ARIC
Land Use Planning (ICAR) for input to AGRIS covering soil science literature generated
P.O. Box No. 426, Shankar Nagar in India
P.O., Nagpur-440010 Research in weathering and soil formation, soil morphology, soil
mineralogy, physicochemical characterisation, pedogenesis, and landscape-
Tel#91-712-534664,532438,534545 climate-soil relationship.
Fax#:91-712-522534 Soil Series of India- The soils are classified as per Soil Taxonomy. The
described soil series now belong to 17 States of the country.
RO- Nagpur, New Delhi, Banglore, Landuse planning- watershed management, land evaluation criteria, crop
Calcutta, Jorhat, Udaipur efficiency zoning
Soil Information system is developed state-wise at 1:250,000 scale.
Presently the soil maps of all the States are digitized, processed and
designed for final output both digital and hardcopy. The thematic layers
and interpreted layers of land evaluation (land capability, land
irrigability and crop suitability), Agro-Ecological Zones and soil
degradation themes are prepared.
Districts level information system is developed for about 15 districts at 1:
50, 000 scale. The soil information will be at soil series level in this system.
Soil resource inventory of States, districts water-sheds (1:250,000;
1:50,000; 1:10,000/8000)
30. National Institute of Ocean Waste load allocation in selected estuaries (Tapi estuary and Ennore
Technology, creek) is one the components under the Integrated Coastal and Marine
Velacherry-Tambaram main road Area Management (ICMAM) programme of the Department of
Narayanapuram Ocean Development ICMAM is conducted with an IDA based credit
Chennai, Tamil Nadu to the Government of India under the Environmental Capacity
Tel#91-44-2460063 / 2460064/ Building project of MoEF (waste assimilation capacity of Ennore
2460066/ 2460067 creek is over)
Fax#91-44-2460645 Physical oceanographic component of Coastal & Ocean monitoring
Predictive System (COMAPS) a long term monitoring program under
the Department of Ocean Development
Identification of suitable locations for disposal of dredge spoil using
mathematical models & environmental criteria
EIA Manual and EIA guidelines for port and harbour projects
31. National Institute of Oceanography, Coastal Ocean Monitoring and Predictions(COMAP)-Monitoring of
Goa coastal waters for physicochemical and biological parameters
including petroleum hydrocarbons, trace metals, heavy metals, and
RO- Mumbai, Kochi biomass of primary (phytoplankton) and secondary (zooplankton,
microbial and benthic organisms)
Marine Biodiversity of selected ecosystem along the West Coast of
India

32. National Botanical Research Dust filtering potential of common avenue trees and roadside shrubs
Institute, has been determined, besides studies have also been conducted on
Post Box No 436 Rana Pratap Marg heavy-metals accumulation potential of aquatic plants supposedly
Lucknow- 226001, useful as indicators of heavy metal pollution in water bodies and
Tel: (+91) 522 271031-35 Fax: (+91) capable of reducing the toxic metals from water bodies.
522 282849, 282881 Assessment of bio-diversity of various regions of India
Lucknow
33. National Geophysical Research Exploration, assessment and management of ground water resources
Institute, Uppal Road, Hyderabad including ground water modelling and pollution studies
Telephone:0091-40-7171124,
FAX:0091-40-7171564
34. National Environmental National Air Quality Monitoring (NAQM) for CPCB
Engineering Research Institute, Database on cleaner technologies of industrial productions
Nagpur
RO- Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai,
Calcutta, Ahmedabad, Cochin,
Hyderabad, Kanpur
35. National Hydrology Institute, Basin studies, hydrometeorological network improvement,
Roorkee hydrological year book, hydrological modelling, regional flood
RO- Belgaum (Hard Rock Regional formulae, reservoir sedimentation studies, environmental hydrology,
Centre), Jammu (Western watershed development studies, tank studies, and drought studies.
Himalayan Regional Centre),
Guwahati (North Eastern Regional
Centre), Kakinada (Deltaic Regional
Centre), Patna (Ganga Plains North
Regional Centre), and Sagar (Ganga
Plains South)
36. National Institute Of Urban Affairs, Urban Statistics Handbook
India Habitat Centre, New Delhi
37. National Institute of Occupational epidemiological studies and surveillance of hazardous occupations
Health including air pollution, noise pollution, agricultural hazards, industrial
Meghaninagar, Ahmedabad hazards in organised sectors as well as small scale industries,
carcinogenesis, pesticide toxicology, etc
RO- Banglore, Calcutta WHO collaborative centre for occupational health for South East Asia
region and the lead institute for the international programme on
chemical safety under IPCS (WHO)
38. NRSA Data Centre Satellite data products (raw data, partially processed (radiometrically
Department of Space, Balanagar, corrected but geometrically uncorrected), standard data
(radiometrically and geometrically corrected), geocoded data(1:50,000
Hyderabad 500 037
and 1:25000 scale), special data products like mosaiced, merged and
Ph- 040-3078560 extracted) available on photographic (B?W and FCC in form of film of
3078664 240 mm X 240mm or enlargements/paper prints in scale varying
[email protected] between 1:1M and 1:12500 and size varying between 240mm and
1000mm) and digital media (CD-ROMs, 8 mm tapes)
39. Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Database for groundwater using remote sensing technology (Regional
Water Mission Remote Sensing Service Centre involved in generation of ground
water prospect maps at 1:50,000 scale for the State of Kerala,
Karnataka, AP, MP and Rajasthan for RGNDWM)
40. Space Application Centre National Natural Resource Information System
Value Added Services Cell (VASC) Landuse mapping for coastal regulation zone (construction setback
Remote Sensing Application Area line) upto 1:12500 scale
Ahmedabad 380 053 Inventory of coastal wetlands, coral reefs, mangroves, seaweeds
079-676 1188 Monitoring and condition assessment of protected coastal areas

Fax- 079-6762735 Wetland mapping and inventory
Mapping of potential hotspots and zoning of environmental hazards
General geological and geomorphological mapping in diverse terrain
Landslide risk zonation for Tehre area
41. State Pollution Control Board State Air Quality Monitoring Programme
Inventory of polluting industries
Identification and authorization of hazardous waste generating
industries
Inventory of biomedical waste generating industries
Water quality monitoring of water bodies receiving wastewater
discharges
Inventory of air polluting industries
Industrial air pollution monitoring
Air consent, water consent, authorization, environment monitoring
reports
42. State Ground Water Board
43. Survey of India Topographical surveys on 1:250,000 scales, 1:50,000 and 1:25,000
scales
Digital Cartographical Data Base of topographical maps on scales
1:250,000 and 1:50,000
Data generation and its processing for redefinition of Indian Geodetic
Datum
Maintenance of National Tidal Data Centre and receiving/ processing
of tidal data of various ports.
Coastal mapping along the Eastern coast line has been in progress to
study the effect of submergence due to rise in sea-level and other
natural phenomenon. Ground surveys have been completed for the
proposed coastal region and maps are under printing.
District planning maps containing thematic information (135 maps)
have been printed out of 249 maps covering half the districts of India.
Districts planning maps for remaining half of the area are being
processed by National Atlas and Thematic Mapping Organisation
(NATMO)
44. Town and Country Planning Urban mapping - Thematic maps and graphic database on towns
Organisation (under progress in association with NRSA and State town planning
department)
45. Wildlife Institute of India Post Bag Provide information and advice on specific wildlife management
No. 18, Chandrabani Dehradun - problems.
248 001, Uttaranchal National Wildlife Database
Tel#0135 640111 -15,
Fax#0135 640117
email : wii@wii .
46. Zoological Survey of India Red Book for listing of endemic species
Prani Vigyan Bhawan Survey of faunal resources
'M' Block, New Alipore
Calcutta - 700 053
Phone # 91-33-4786893, 4783383
Fax # 91-33-786893
RO - Shillong, Pune, Dehradun,
Jabalpur, Jodhpur, Chennai, Patna,
Hyderabad, Canning, Behrampur,
Kozikode, Itanagar, Digha, Port
Bliar, Solan

ANNEXURE XI
Impact Prediction Tools
Table 1: Choice of Models for Impact Prediction: Air Environment*
Model Application Remarks
ISCST 3 § Appropriate for point, area and line sources § Can take up to 99 sources
§ Application for flat or rolling terrain § Computes concentration on 600
§ Transport distance up to 50 km valid receptors in Cartesian on polar
§ Computes for 1 hr to annual averaging coordinate system
periods § Can take receptor elevation
§ Requires source data,
meteorological and receptor data as
input.
AERMOD § Settling and dry deposition of particles; § Can take up to 99 sources
with § Building wake effects (excluding cavity § Computes concentration on 600
AERMET region impacts); receptors in Cartesian on polar
§ Point, area, line, and volume sources; coordinate system
§ Plume rise as a function of downwind § Can take receptor elevation
distance; § Requires source data,
§ Multiple point, area, line, or volume meteorological and receptor data as
sources; input.
§ Limited terrain adjustment;
§ Long-term and short-term averaging modes;
§ Rural or urban modes;
§ Variable receptor grid density;
§ Actual hourly meteorology data
PTMAX § Screening model applicable for a single § Require source characteristics
point source § No met data required
§ Computes maximum concentration and § Used mainly for ambient air
distance of maximum concentration monitoring network design
occurrence as a function of wind speed and
stability class
PTDIS § Screening model applicable for a single § Require source characteristics
point source § Average met data (wind speed,
§ Computes maximum pollutant concentration temperature, stability class etc.)
and its occurrences for the prevailing required
meteorological conditions § Used mainly to see likely impact of
a single source
MPTER § Appropriate for point, area and line sources § Can take 250 sources
applicable for flat or rolling terrain § Computes concentration at 180
§ Transport distance up to 50 km valid receptors up to 10 km
§ Computes for 1 hr to annual averaging § Requires source data,
periods meteorological data and receptor
§ Terrain adjustment is possible coordinates
CTDM PLUS § Point source steady state model, can § Can take maximum 40 Stacks and
(Complex estimate hrly average concentration in computes concentration at
Terrain isolated hills/ array of hills maximum 400 receptors
Dispersion § Does not simulate calm met
Model) conditions
§ Hill slopes are assumed not to
exceed 15 degrees
§ Requires sources, met and terrain
characteristics and receptor details
UAM (Urban § 3-D grid type numerical simulation model §
Airshed § Computes O3 concentration short term
Model) episodic conditions lasting for 1 or 2 days
resulting from NOx and VOCs
§ Appropriate for single urban area having
significant O3 problems
i
RAM (Rural § Steady state Gaussian plume model for § Suitable for flat terrains
Airshed computing concentration of relatively stable § Transport distance less than 50 km.
Model) pollutants for 1 hr to 1 day averaging time
§ Application for point and area sources in
rural and urban setting
CRESTER § Applicable for single point source either in § Can take up to 19 Stacks
rural or urban setting simultaneously at a common site.
§ Computes highest and second highest § Unsuitable for cool and high
concentration for 1hr, 3hr, 24hr and annual velocity emissions
averaging times § Do not account for tall buildings or
§ Tabulates 50 highest concentration for topographic features
entire year for each averaging times § Computes concentration at 180
receptor, circular wing at five
downwind ring distance 36 radials
§ Require sources, and met data
OCD § It determines the impact of offshore § Requires source emission data
(Offshore and emissions from point sources on the air § Require hrly met data at offshore
coastal quality of coastal regions and onshore locations like water
Dispersion § It incorporates overwater plume transport surface temperature; overwater air
Model) and dispersion as well as changes that occur temperature; relative humidity etc.
as the plume crosses the shore line
§ Most suitable for overwater sources shore
onshore receptors are below the lowest
shore height
FDM (Fugitive § Suitable for emissions from fugitive dust § Require dust source particle sizes
Dust Model) sources § Source coordinates for area
§ Source may be point, area or line (up to 121 sources, source height and
source) geographic details
§ Require particle size classification max. up § Can compute concentration at max.
to 20 sizes 1200 receptors
§ Computes concentrations for 1 hr, 3hr, 8hr, § Require met data (wind direction,
24hr or annual average periods speed, Temperature, mixing height
and stability class)
§ Model do not include buoyant
point sources, hence no plume rise
algorithm
RTDM § Estimates GLC is complex/rough (or flat) § Can take up to 35 co-located point
(Rough terrain in the vicinity of one or more co- sources
Terrain located point sources § Require source data and hourly met
Diffusion § Transport distance max. up to 15 km to up data
Model) to 50 km § Computes concentration at
§ Computes for 1 to 24 hr. or annual ave5rage maximum 400 receptors
concentrations § Suitable only for non reactive
gases
§ Do not include gravitational effects
or depletion mechanism such as
rain/ wash out, dry deposition
CDM(Climatol § It is a climatologically steady state GPM for § Suitable for point and area sources
ogically determining long term (seasonal or annual) in urban region, flat terrain
§ Arithmetic average pollutant concentration § Valid for transport distance less
Dispersion at any ground level receptor in an urban area than 50 km
Model) § Long term averages: One month to
one year or longer
PLUVUE-II § Applicable to assess visibility impairment § Require source characteristics, met
(Plume due to pollutants emitted from well defined data and receptor coordinates &
Visibility point sources elevation
Model) § It is used to calculate visual range reduction § Require atmospheric aerosols
ii
and atmospheric discoloration caused by (back ground & emitted)
plumes characteristics, like density,
§ It predicts transport, atmospheric diffusion, particle size
chemical, conversion, optical effects, and § Require background pollutant
surface deposition of point source concentration of SO4, NO3, NOx,
emissions. NO2, O3, SO2 and deposition
velocities of SO2, NO2 and aerosols
MESO-PUFF § It is a Gaussian, Variable trajectory, puff § Can model five pollutants
II (Meso scale superposition model designed to account fro simultaneously (SO2, SO4, NOx,
Puff Model) spatial and temporal variations in transport, HNO3 and NO3)
diffusion, chemical transformation and § Require source characteristics
removal mechanism encountered on § Can take 20 point sources or 5 area
regional scale. source
§ Plume is modeled as a series of discrete § For area source – location,
puffs and each puff is transported effective height, initial puff size,
independently emission is required
§ Appropriate for point and area sources in § Computes pollutant concentration
urban areas at max. 180 discrete receptors and
§ Regional scale model. 1600 (40 x 40) grided receptors
§ Require hourly surface data
including cloud cover and twice a
day upper air data (pressure, temp,
height, wind speed, direction)
§ Do not include gravitational effects
or depletion mechanism such as
rain/ wash out, dry deposition
Table 2: Choice of Models for Impact Modeling: Noise Environment*
Model Application
FHWA (Federal Highway Noise Impact due to vehicular movement on highways

Administration)
Dhwani For predictions of impact due to group of noise sources in the
industrial complex (multiple sound sources)
Hemispherical sound wave propagation Fore predictive impact due to single noise source
Air Port For predictive impact of traffic on airport and rail road
Table 3: Choice of Models for Impact Modeling: Land Environment*
Digital Analysis Techniques Provides land use / land cover

distribution
Ranking analysis for soil Provides suitability criteria Various parameters viz. depth, texture,
suitability criteria for developmental slope, erosion status, geomorphology,
conversation activities flooding hazards, GW potential, land use
etc., are used.
iii
Table 4: Choice of Models for Impact Modeling: Water Environment*

QUAL-II E Wind effect is insignificant, vertical dispersive effects Steady state or dynamic
insignificant applicable to streams model
Data required
Deoxygenation coefficients, re-aeration coefficients for
carbonaceous, nitrogenous and benthic substances,
dissolved oxygen deficit
The model is found excellent to generate water quality
parameters
Photosynthetic and respiration rate of suspended and
attached algae
Parameters measured up to 15 component can be
simulated in any combination, e.g. ammonia, nitrite,
nitrate, phosphorous, carbonaceous BOD, benthic
oxygen demand, DO, coliforms, conservative
substances and temperature
DOSAG-3, Water quality simulation model for streams & canal Steady-state
USEPA: (1-D) A general Water quality model
RECEIV – II,
USEPA
Explore –I, USEPA A river basin water quality model Dynamic, Simple
hydrodynamics
HSPE, USEPA Hydrologic simulation model Dynamic, Simple
hydrodynamics
RECEIVE-II, A general dynamic planning model for water quality
USEPA management
Stanford watershed This model simulates stream flows once historic
model precipitation data are supplied
The major components of the hydrologic cycle are
modeled including interception, surface detention,
overland inflow, groundwater, evapo-transpiration and
routing of channel flows, temperature, TDS, DO,
carbonaceous BOD coliforms, algae, zooplanktons,
nitrite, nitrate, ammonia, phosphate and conservative
substances can be simulated
Hydrocomp model Long-term meteorological and wastewater Time dependant (Dynamic)
characterization data is used to simulate stream flows
and stream water quality
Stormwater Runoff is modeled from overland flow, through surface Time Dependent
Management channels, and through sewer network Both combined
model (SWMM) and separate sewers can be modeled.
This model also enables to simulate water quality
effects to stormwater or combined sewer discharges.
This model simulates runoff resulting from individual
rainfall events.
Battelle Reservoir Water body is divided into segments along the Two Dimensional multi-
model direction of the flow and each segment is divided into segment model
number of horizontal layers. The model is found to
generate excellent simulation of temperature and good
prediction of water quality parameters.
The model simulates temperature, DO, total and
iv
benthic BOD, phytoplankton, zooplankton, organic and
inorganic nitrogen, phosphorous, coliform bacteria,
toxic substances and hydrodynamic conditions.
TIDEP (Turbulent Horizontal temperature homogeneity Coefficient of Steady state model
diffusion vertical turbulent diffusion constant for charge of area
temperature model with depth negligible coefficient of thermal exchange
reservoirs) constant
Data required wind speed, air temperature, air
humidity, net incoming radiation, surface water
temperature, heat exchange coefficients and vertical
turbulent diffusion coefficients.
BIOLAKE Model estimates potential fish harvest from a take Steady state model
Estuary models/ It is simulates tides, currents, and discharge in shallow, Dynamic model
estuarial Dynamic vertically mixed estuaries excited by ocean tides,
model hydrologic influx, and wind action
Tides, currents in estuary are simulated
Dynamic Water It simulates the mass transport of either conservative or Dynamic model
Quality Model non-conservative quality constituents utilizing
information derived from the hydrodynamic model
Bay-Delta model is the programme generally used.
Up to 10 independent quality parameters of either
conservative or non-conservative type plus the BOD-
DO coupled relationship can be handled
HEC -2 To compute water surface profiles for stead7y,
gradually: varying flow in both prismatic & non-
prismatic channels
SMS Lake circulation, salt water intrusion, surface water Surface water Modeling
profile simulation model system Hydrodynamic
model
RMA2 To compute flow velocities and water surface Hydrodynamic analysis
elevations model
RMA4 Solves advective-diffusion equations to model up to six Constituent transport model
non-interacting constituents
SED2D-WES Model simulates transport of sediment Sediment transport model
HIVEL2D Model supports subcritical and supercritical flow A 2-dimensional
analysis hydrodynamic model
MIKE-II, DHI Model supports, simulations of flows, water quality, Professional Engineering
and sediment transport in estuaries, rives, irrigation software package
systems, channels & other water bodies
Table 5: Choice of Models for Impact Modeling: Biological Environment*
Name Relevance Applications Remarks
Flora
Sample Density and relative Average number of individuals The quadrant sampling
plot density species per unit area technique is applicable in all
methods types of plant communities and
for the study of submerged,
Density and relative Relative degree to which a
sessile (attached at the base) or
v
dominance species predominates a sedentary plants
community by its sheer numbers,
size bulk or biomass
Frequency and relative Plant dispersion over an area or Commonly accepted plot size:
frequency importance within a community 0.1 m2- mosses, lichens & other
value mat-like plants
Average of relative density, 0.1 m2- herbaceous vegetation
relative dominance and relative including grasses
frequency
10.20 m2 – for shrubs and
saplings up to 3m tall, and
100 m2 – for tree communities
Transects Cover Ratio of total amount of line This methods allows for rapid
& line intercepted by each species and assessment of vegetation
intercepts total length of the line intercept transition zones, and requires
methods given its cover minimum time or equipment of
establish
Relative dominance It is the ratio of total individuals Two or more vegetation strata
of a species and total individuals can be sampled simultaneously
of all species
Plot-less Mean point plant Mean point – plant distance Vegetation measurements are
sampling Mean area per plant determined from points rather
methods than being determined in an area
Mean area per plant
with boundaries
Density and relative Method is used in grass-land and
density open shrub and tree communities
Dominance and relative It allows more rapid and
dominance extensive sampling than the plot
method
Importance value Point- quarter method is
commonly used in woods and
forests.
Fauna
Species Animal species list List of animal communities Animal species lists present
list observed directly common and scientific names of
methods the species involved so that the
faunal resources of the area are
catalogued
Direct Animal species list List of animals communities This method involves collection,
Contact observed directly study and release of animals
Methods
Count Drive counts Observation of animals Count indices provide estimates
indices by driving them past trained of animal populations and are
methods observers obtained from signs, calls or
Temporal counts
(Roadside trailside counts or roadside
and aerial counts
count
methods)
Call counts Count of all animals passing a These estimates, through they do
fixed point during some stated not provide absolute population
vi
interval of time numbers, Provide an index of the
various species in an area
Such indices allow comparisons
through the seasons or between
sites or habitats
Removal Population size Number of species captured Removal methods are used to
methods obtain population estimates of
small mammals, such as, rodents
through baited snap traps
Market Population size estimate Number of species originally It involves capturing a portion of
capture (M) marked (T) the population and at some later
methods Number of marked animals date sampling the ratio of
recaptured (t) and total number marked to total animals caught
of animals captured during in the population
census (n)
N = nT/t
Table 6: Choice of Models for Impact Predictions: Socio-economic Environment*
Relevance
Extrapolative A prediction is made that is consistent with past

Methods and present socio-economic data, e.g. a prediction
based on the linear extrapolation of current trends
Intuitive Delphi technique is used to determine Conjecture Brainstorming Heuristic
Forecasting environmental priorities and also to make intuitive programming Delphi consensus
(Delphi predictions through the process of achieving group
techniques) consensus
Trend Predictions may be obtained by extrapolating Trend breakthrough precursor events
extrapolation present trends Not an accurate method of making correlation and regression
and correlation socio-economic forecasts, because a time series
cannot be interpreted or extrapolated very far into
the future with out some knowledge of the
underlying physical, biological, and social factors
Metaphors and The experience gained else where is used to Growth historical simulation
analogies predict the socio-economic impacts commonsense forecasts
Scenarios Scenarios are common-sense forecasts of data. Common-sense
Each scenario is logically constructed on model of
a potential future for which the degrees of
“confidence” as to progression and outcome
remain undefined
Dynamic Model predicts net economic gain to the society
modeling after considering all inputs required for conversion
(Input- Out of raw materials along with cost of finished
model) product
Normative Desired socio-economic goals are specified and an Morphological analysis technology
Methods attempt is made to project the social environment scanning contextual mapping
backward in time to the present to examine - functional array
whether existing or planned resources and
vii
Relevance

environmental programmes are adequate to meet - graphic method
the goals Mission networks and functional
arrays decision trees & relevance
trees matrix methods scenarios
* NOTE: (i) If a project proponent prefer to use any model other than listed, can do so, with prior concurrence
of concerned appraisal committee. (ii) Project-specific proposed prediction tools need to be identified by the
project proponent and shall be incorporated in the draft ToR to be submitted to the Authority for the
consideration and approval by the concerned EAC/SEAC.
viii
ANNEXURE XII
Composition of EAC
Composition of the EAC
The Members of the EAC shall be Experts with the requisite expertise and experience in the
following fields /disciplines. In the event that persons fulfilling the criteria of “Experts” are not
available, Professionals in the same field with sufficient experience may be considered:
̇ Environment Quality Experts: Experts in measurement/monitoring, analysis and

interpretation of data in relation to environmental quality
̇ Sectoral Experts in Project Management: Experts in Project Management or Management of
Process/Operations/Facilities in the relevant sectors.
̇ Environmental Impact Assessment Process Experts: Experts in conducting and carrying out
Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and preparation of Environmental Management
Plans (EMPs) and other Management plans and who have wide expertise and knowledge of
predictive techniques and tools used in the EIA process
̇ Risk Assessment Experts
̇ Life Science Experts in floral and faunal management
̇ Forestry and Wildlife Experts
̇ Environmental Economics Expert with experience in project appraisal
i
REFERENCES
Documents
̇ Ministry of Environment and Forest, GoI – “Environment Impact Assessment Notification”

S.O.1533 dated 14th September 2006.
̇ Ministry of Environment and Forest, GoI – “Environment Impact Assessment Notification

2006 – Amendment” S.O. 195 (E)” consideration dated 1st December, 2009.
̇ Ministry of Environment and Forest, GoI – Charter on Corporate Responsibility for

Environment Protection Action Points for 17 Categories of Industries, CPCB, March 2003.
̇ Larry W. Canter, “Environmental Impact Assessment”, Second Edition, McGraw Hill,

University of Oklahoma, 1997.
̇ International Association for Impact Assessment – “Principles of Environmental Impact

Assessment Best Practice”, Institute of Environmental Assessment, UK.
̇ World Bank Group – “Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook on Petrochemicals

Manufacturing” effective July 1998.
̇ Environmental Guidelines for Petrochemicals Manufacturing - Multilateral Investment

Guarantee Agency.
̇ USEPA Sector Notebook on Large Volume Organic Chemical Industry.
̇ Central Pollution Control Board - Publication on Development of National Emission

Standards for Petrochemical Plants, PROBES, 2008.
̇ COINDS/30/88-89 Minimal National Standards - Petrochemical Industry (Basic and

Intermediates).
̇ Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Protection (CREP) - Action Points for

Petrochemicals.
̇ “Petrochemical Process Technology”, Mall I.D., Published by Macmillan India Ltd., New
Delhi.
̇ The Petrochemicals Industry in Developing Asia, A Review of the Current Situation and
Prospects for Development in the 1990s - by Walter Vergara and Dominique Babelon World
Bank Technical Paper Number 113, Industry and Energy Series. Washington, DC.
̇ Petrochemicals - An Industry and Its Future by Roger Langley. Special Report No. 2067.
̇ Focus on Environmental Impacts of Petrochemical Plants in Stenungsund. SNV Report

Number 3209. National Swedish Environmental Protection Board. 1987.
̇ Environmental compliance report for TASNEE Petrochemicals LDPE Project.- Tasnee

Petrochemicals Al- Jubail Saudi Arabia.
TGM for Petro-chemical Industry September 2010

i
̇ Chemicals and Petrochemicals Ltd.- A report on Chemical and Petro Chemical industry
Corporate Catalyst India.
̇ Chemical and Petrochemical Sector – © OECD/IEA 2009 International Energy Agency.
̇ The Future of the Petrochemical Industry A Markal-Matter Analysis B.J. Groenendaal, D.J.
Gielen.
̇ Industrial Energy Efficiency/CO2 Emissions: Comments from the Petrochemical Industry

Giuseppe Astarita, CEFIC, IEA Workshop, Paris, October 1, 2007.
̇ Effluents and Solid Waste Analysis in a Petrochemical Company - A Case Study of Eleme
Petrochemical Company Ltd, Port Harcourt, Nigeria A.U. Israel, I.B. Obot, S.A Umoren, V.
Mkkpenie and G.A Ebong
̇ Training material of the World Bank Funded Programme on “Environmetnal Management

Strategies for Pollution Control and Implementation of Standards in Petrochemical
Industries” Organised by the TGB Partnership, NC, USA, May 12 to June 6, 2003.
̇ Review of Environmental Statements Submitted by Petrochemical Industries - A CPCB

Project Report submitted by Engineers India Pvt. Ltd.
̇ Series of Publications of the American Petroleum Institute.
Websites
̇ http://moef.nic.in/index.php
̇ http://www.cpcb.nic.in/
̇ http://www.epa.gov/
̇ www.wikipedia.org
̇ www.epa.gov/sectors
̇ http://www.iaia.org
TGM for Petro-chemical Industry September 2010

ii
IL&FS Ecosmart Limited
Flat # 408, Saptagiri Towers
Begumpet
Hyderabad – 500 016
Ph: + 91 40 40163016
Fax: + 91 40 40032220
For any queries or technical inputs kindly mail:
[email protected]
[email protected]

TGM - Petrochemical Complexes - 160910 - NK PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TGM - Petrochemical Complexes - 160910 - NK PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TGM - Petrochemical Complexes - 160910 - NK PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHNICAL EIA GUIDANCE MANUAL

Core Project Coordination Team Mr. Mahesh Babu

Expert Resource Person Prof. I. D. Mall

1. INTRODUCTION TO THE TECHNICAL EIA GUIDANCE MANUALS PROJECT 1-1

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes i September 2010

3.4.3 Control technologies for air emissions .............................................................. 3-26

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes ii September 2010

4.7 Environmental Management Plan ..................................................................................... 4-42

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes iii September 2010

Table 3-2: Feedstock for Major Petrochemical Complexes................................................................ 3-2

Table 3-3: Comparison of Feedstock – Energy consumption ............................................................. 3-3

Table 3-4: Feedstock based Differences in Cracking Unit Processes................................................. 3-7

Table 3-6: Selection of Appropriate Control Technique................................................................... 3-27

Table 3-7: Levels of Control for Atmospheric Emissions ................................................................ 3-38

Table 3-9: Technology Levels for Temporary Waste Storage.......................................................... 3-45

Table 3-11: Emission Standards for Heater/Furnace/Boilers/Vaporizers ......................................... 3-48

Table 3-12: Emission Standards for Organic Particulates ................................................................ 3-48

Table 3-17: Storage of Benzene, VCM and ACN............................................................................. 3-50

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes iv September 2010

Table 4-2: Matrix of Impacts ............................................................................................................ 4-10

Table 4-5: Typical Mitigation Measures........................................................................................... 4-40

Table 4-6: Structure of EIA Report................................................................................................... 4-44

Table 5-2: Organization-specific Functions........................................................................................ 5-2

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes v September 2010

Figure 2-2: Types of Impacts ............................................................................................................ 2-14

Figure 2-3: Cumulative Impact ......................................................................................................... 2-15

Figure 3-2: Naphtha Cracking............................................................................................................. 3-8

Figure 4-1: Prior Environmental Clearance Process........................................................................... 4-2

Figure 4-2: Approach for EIA Study ................................................................................................ 4-18

Figure 4-3: Risk Assessment – Conceptual Framework ................................................................... 4-27

Figure 4-4: Comprehensive Risk Assessment - At a Glance ............................................................ 4-29

Figure 4-5: Disaster Management Plan............................................................................................. 4-33

Figure 4-6: Elements of Mitigation................................................................................................... 4-37

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes vi September 2010

Modifications to Equipments Can Also Prevent Pollution – Opportunities

Process Flow Diagrams of Olefins and Aromatics

A Compilation of Legal Instruments

General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants

Form 1 (Application Form for Obtaining EIA Clearance)

Critically Polluted Industrial Areas and Clusters / Potential Impact Zones

Pre-feasibility Report: Points for Possible Coverage

Types of Monitoring and Network Design Considerations

Guidance for Assessment of Baseline Components and Attributes

Sources of Secondary Data

Impact Prediction Tools

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes vii September 2010

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes viii September 2010

IPCL Indian Petrochemical Corporation Limited

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes ix September 2010

UTEIAA Union Territory Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority

TGM for Petro-chemical Complexes x September 2010

The Ministry of Environment & Forests (MOEF) introduced the Environmental

Although the process of obtaining environmental clearance consisting of Screening,

The Technical Guidance Manual of "Petrochemical Complexes" sector describestypes of

'Petrochemical Complexes' are involved in manufacturing aromatic hydrocarlons

Atrnospheric contamination by hazardous chemicals from the petrochemical indushy

India's industrial competitiveness and environmental future depends on Industries

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process of identifying, predicting,

̇ Pollution potential as the basis for prior environmental clearance instead of