Interstate 91 Meeting Presentation

Public Meeting #3
Sheraton Springfield Monarch Place Hotel

One Monarch Place – The Mahogany Room
Springfield, Massachusetts
September 12, 2018

Welcome & Introductions
Ethan Britland – Project Manager (MassDOT)
Michael Clark – Project Manager (MassDOT)
Mark Arigoni, LA – Principal-in-Charge (MMI)
Van Kacoyannakis, PE – Traffic (MMI)
John Hoey - QA/QC (MMI)
Sarah Paritsky – Public Involvement (Regina Villa)

Emily Christin – Public Involvement (Regina Villa)
2 September 12, 2018

Agenda
Welcome and Introductions

Study Progress & Alternatives Review
Refresher of the Evaluation Criteria
Short and Mid-term Improvements
Draft Recommendations
Next Steps

I-91 Viaduct Study Goals, Objectives, and
Evaluation Criteria
Mobility and Connectivity – maintain and improve the efficient function of
I-91, I-291, associated ramps, and key intersections in the study area,
encouraging mode shift through improved bike/ped functionality
Safety – improve bike/ped and vehicular safety throughout the study area, as
well as public safety adjacent to the viaduct
Environmental Effects – improve air quality, reduce noise impacts, and

decrease environmental impacts such as wetlands incursion and pavement
footprint
Land Use and Economic Development – enhance access to existing

development parcels and establish new development parcels, while creating
more attractive, economically viable riverfront connections
Community Effects – provide fair and equitable treatment for Environmental

Justice populations and improve the visual perception of the viaduct
Cost – estimate construction and long-term maintenance costs

4
September 12, 2018
Project Review: Alternatives Development
• Ten alternatives initially developed

• Additional Assessment Effort (West Side Alternatives)
• 11 Working Group Meetings (WGMs)
• Three Public Meetings (including tonight)
• Three alternatives advanced for analysis
• Sunken Highway following Current Alignment
• Sunken Highway following Modified Alignment
• Reconstructed Elevated Highway
• Detailed Evaluation Criteria Analysis: Alternatives developed to

achieve favorable outcomes by balancing community, environmental
impacts, engineering complexity, ease of implementation, and costs

Refresher of Three Alternatives
1. Sunken, Tunnel, or Combination(s) following current I-

91 Alignment
2. Sunken, Tunnel, or Combination(s) following modified
I-91 Alignment (section of combined rail and highway
corridor)
3. Reconstructed Elevated Structure (Modern Viaduct)

Alternative No.1
Sunken following current I-91 Alignment
Conceptual Planning Study: This graphic represents a

hypothetical development scenario that could be
representative of potential future development along the I-91
Viaduct Corridor and is shown for general informational
purposes. Any actual future development that occurs along
this corridor may vary from this conceptual representation.

Current
Redevelopment
Blocks
Alternative #1
September 12, 2018

Alternative No. 2
Sunken following modified I-91 Alignment

9
September 12, 2018
Current
Redevelopment
Blocks
Alternative #2
September 12, 2018

Alternative No. 3
Reconstructed Elevated Structure (Modern Viaduct)


Current
Redevelopment
Blocks
Alternative #3
September 12, 2018

Evaluation Criteria / Comments
• A workbook was developed to function as a stand alone
document providing information to support ratings
shown in the Evaluation Criteria.
• Comments were generated by the Working Group

following WGM #10.
• Responses to comments were provided and posted

to the study website
Mobility & Connectivity
Safety
Environmental Effects
Land Use & Economic Development
Community Effects
Cost

Evaluation Criteria / Comments
• The Evaluation Criteria was further developed and refined based
on comments provided following the WG meeting in June 2017)
• Mapping & Ratings (Harvey Ball/Numeric) were reviewed and

revised as necessary.

Public Health Activities
• Baseline health assessment informed Existing Conditions
data collection
• Characterizing baseline health information that are directly related to
transportation and land-use decisions
• Hospitalizations for Asthma and Heart Attack; Pediatric Asthma data; Small Area
Estimates from a survey (BRFSS) for hypertension, obesity, diabetes, F/V
consumption, physical activity rates
• Key informant interviews conducted through UMass

graduate course
• Examine the I-91 Viaduct Study evaluation criteria for community relevance
• Outreach to community members and groups

• Live Well Springfield, Baystate Health, Arise for Social Justice,
Springfield Climate Justice, cities of Springfield and West
Springfield

• Development of overlay maps to identify vulnerable areas and
populations

• MassDOT and DPH continued to coordinate during

alternatives evaluation process
• Evaluation criteria intended to incorporate health

benefits and impacts but ultimate utility was limited
• Data availability and robustness too limited to draw conclusions
• Planning concepts and evaluation outputs require further

specificity to inform public health analysis

Comparison of Alternatives
Note: Build Alternative cost estimates include component improvements
Sunken Highway Following Sunken Highway Following Reconstructed Elevated
Current Alignment Modified Alignment Highway
Some reduction in number of
Some reduction in number of Highest reduction in number
merge, diverge, and weave
merge, diverge, and weave of merge, diverge, and weave
locations
locations locations
Mobility and
Connectivity
Improvement in vehicular Minimal change in vehicular
Improvement in vehicular
travel time along I-91 and
All alternatives
study area
decline in study area
smaller improvement in study
area
compared against
Reduction of on-ramps/off- Reduction of on-ramps/off- Reduction of on-ramps/off-
Rehab Option
Safety
ramps improves bike/ped
conditions
conditions
conditions Rehabilitation of
Redesign of 15 crash clusters Redesign of 15 crash clusters Redesign of 15 crash clusters viaduct under current
Slight increase in VMT and Slight increase in VMT and Virtually no change in VMT or alignment at existing
Environmental
decrease of air quality decrease of air quality air quality
elevation
27,000 square feet of 27,000 square feet of 27,000 square feet of
Effects
wetlands impacts wetlands impacts wetlands impacts
Reduced noise impacts Reduced noise impacts Similar noise impacts

2040 Cost - $695 M
468,800 square feet of space 553,800 square feet of space 13,800 square feet of space
over highway created over highway created over highway created
Land Use and
Economic
Potential for $2.2 million in Potential for $3.5 million in Potential for $300,000 in
Development
annual tax revenue at full annual tax revenue at full annual tax revenue at full
build-out build-out build-out
Potential for greenspace and Potential for greenspace and
Potential for activation of
better connection to better connection to
space underneath viaduct
Riverfront Riverfront
Community Effects
8-12 year construction
10-15 year construction 10-15 year construction
duration
duration duration
Cost (in 2040
$3.78 billion $3.74 billion $3.14 billion
18
dollars)
September 12, 2018
Short and Mid-Term Alternatives
• Associated projects (part of the Alternatives)

outside of the Viaduct which serve study goals and
objectives
• Can be implemented as stand-alone projects or in

logical groups or phases

Longmeadow Curve Area Improvements
Shared Use Path Connection from

Forest Park to CT River Greenway
Longmeadow Curve
South End Bridge
Route 5 and Route 57

Interchange improvements



• Construction of collector-distributor roads along
I-91 mainline and roundabouts at South End
Bridge and U.S. Route 5
• Ability to access I-91 southbound from US-5 in
Longmeadow
• Elimination of weaving hazards along I-91

mainline
• Elimination of US-5/MA-57 rotary in Agawam

for operational and safety improvements
• Creation of pedestrian access from Forest Park

to Connecticut Riverwalk and Bikeway in
Springfield across South End Bridge to Agawam
Estimated 2040 costs:
Longmeadow Curve - $213 million

South End Bridge - $206 million
US-5/MA-57 interchange in Agawam - $157 million
Bicycle/pedestrian bridge - $20 million
I-291 Southbound to I-91 Southbound On-Ramp
Relocation
• Shifts on-ramp from left-hand entrance
onto I-91 to right-hand entrance
• Eliminates weaving movements from on-

ramp to Exit 7 towards Memorial Bridge
• Restriping with deck replacement project to

discourage weaving movements
• Estimated 2040 cost - $152 million

Plainfield Street / Route 20
Improvements
• New bridges over I-91 and railroad
tracks
• Third lane of westbound vehicular

travel
• Bicycle and pedestrian improvements
• Intersection reconstruction at Main

Street and Avocado Street
• Estimated 2040 cost - $76 million

Short Term Improvements
Safety and aesthetic improvements

underneath viaduct
Improvements or relocation of pedestrian

bridge behind former Luxe Burger/BHOF
Cost estimates for each of the short term improvements are equal to
or less than $2 million in 2018 dollars
Add a shared-use path to east

side of US-5 in Springfield - link
Forest Park with Longmeadow

Improvements to walkway underneath

railroad to Riverfront Park north of State
Street
Improve at-grade pedestrian crossing

to Riverfront Park south of State
Street (active crossing)

Provide ADA accessible ramp or switchback

from bridge to River Road for bicyclists and
pedestrians
Cost estimates for each of the short term improvements are equal to
or less than $2 million in 2018 dollars

Cost Estimates
Associated Projects - can be constructed regardless of Alternative

($826M)

I-291 SB to I-91 SB entrance - $152 million
Plainfield Street / Route 20 improvements (north of I-291) - $76 million
CT Riverwalk/Bikeway improvements - $20 million
Under viaduct improvements – (approx.) $2 million

Cost Estimates
Alt. 1 – Sunken in Current Alignment
Alternative Rehab Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3
Alt. 2 – Sunken in New Alignment
Viaduct Section $695 M $2.95 B $2.91 B $2.31 B
Alt. 3 – Reconstructed Elevated Associated Projects $826 M $826 M $826 M $826 M
Order of Magnitude Construction Cost $1.52 B $3.78 B $3.74 B $3.14 B

(in 2040 dollars)
All Alternative costs include I-91 SB/I-291 NB and I-291 SB/I-91 NB ramp systems, which may
require replacement prior to expected lifespan of viaduct.
Component breakdowns for Build Alternatives:

I-91 through downtown core (Alts. 1/2) - $2.475-2.5 billion
I-91 through downtown core (Alt. 3) - $1.875 billion
I-91/I-291 interchange (all) - $407-424 million
I-91 northern touchdown (all) - $33 million
E/W Columbus Avenue frontage road improvements - $155-160 million
Associated Projects - can be constructed regardless of Alternative ($826M)
I-291 SB to I-91 SB entrance - $152 million
Plainfield Street / Route 20 improvements (north of I-291) - $76 million
CT Riverwalk/Bikeway improvements - $20 million
Under viaduct improvements – (approx.) $2 million
Draft Recommendations
Viaduct Rehabilitation selected as the option for a long-term project with
several short and mid-term associated projects
Longmeadow Curve Area improvements
I-291 SB to I-91 SB ramp relocation
Route 20 improvements in Springfield
Short-term alternatives around the viaduct
MassDOT to work with municipal (local cities and towns) and regional
(PVPC) parties to initiate the project development process
o For locally-owned infrastructure, municipalities and PVPC pursue with MassDOT support
o For MassDOT infrastructure, MassDOT pursues with local and regional support. Given
transportation funding constraints, prioritization of the mid and short term
improvements needs to be established regionally and is subject to availability and
funding.

Next Steps
Draft Report Published for Public Comment

Report can be accessed at the study website: www.mass.gov/i-91-
viaduct-study
Comments due by October 10, 2018
To comment:
Email the Project Manager: Michael Clark, [email protected]
Call: 857-368-8867 or TTY: 857-368-0655
Mail: Office of Transportation Planning
Attn: Michael Clark/I-91 Viaduct Study
Massachusetts Department of Transportation Planning
10 Park Plaza, Suite #4150, Boston, MA 02116
Final Report issued after 30 day public comment period

Questions & Comments
Contacts:
Michael Clark, Project Manager

Phone: 857-368-8867
Email: [email protected]
Ethan Britland, Project Manager

Phone: 857-368-8840
Email: [email protected]
Study Website Link:

www.mass.gov/i-91-viaduct-study

Thank you!

Interstate 91 Meeting Presentation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Interstate 91 Meeting Presentation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Interstate 91 Meeting Presentation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Public Meeting #3

Sheraton Springfield Monarch Place Hotel

September 12, 2018

Ethan Britland – Project Manager (MassDOT)

Michael Clark – Project Manager (MassDOT)

Mark Arigoni, LA – Principal-in-Charge (MMI)

Van Kacoyannakis, PE – Traffic (MMI)

John Hoey - QA/QC (MMI)

Sarah Paritsky – Public Involvement (Regina Villa)

2 September 12, 2018

Welcome and Introductions

3 September 12, 2018

Environmental Effects – improve air quality, reduce noise impacts, and

Land Use and Economic Development – enhance access to existing

Community Effects – provide fair and equitable treatment for Environmental

Cost – estimate construction and long-term maintenance costs

• Ten alternatives initially developed

• Detailed Evaluation Criteria Analysis: Alternatives developed to

5 September 12, 2018

1. Sunken, Tunnel, or Combination(s) following current I-

6 September 12, 2018

Conceptual Planning Study: This graphic represents a

7 September 12, 2018

September 12, 2018

Conceptual Planning Study: This graphic represents a

September 12, 2018

Conceptual Planning Study: This graphic represents a

11 September 12, 2018

September 12, 2018

• Comments were generated by the Working Group

• Responses to comments were provided and posted

13 September 12, 2018

• Mapping & Ratings (Harvey Ball/Numeric) were reviewed and

14 September 12, 2018

• Key informant interviews conducted through UMass

• Outreach to community members and groups

15 September 12, 2018

16 September 12, 2018

• MassDOT and DPH continued to coordinate during

• Evaluation criteria intended to incorporate health

• Planning concepts and evaluation outputs require further

17 September 12, 2018

Reduced noise impacts Reduced noise impacts Similar noise impacts

• Associated projects (part of the Alternatives)

• Can be implemented as stand-alone projects or in

19 September 12, 2018

Shared Use Path Connection from

South End Bridge

Route 5 and Route 57

20 September 12, 2018

21 September 12, 2018

22 September 12, 2018

• Elimination of weaving hazards along I-91

• Elimination of US-5/MA-57 rotary in Agawam

• Creation of pedestrian access from Forest Park

Estimated 2040 costs:

Longmeadow Curve - $213 million

• Eliminates weaving movements from on-