Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Annex 8 Ec Conference Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    noronisa talusob
    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for participants of the conference "Civil Society Development in Southeast Europe: Building Europe Together". The questionnaire asks participants to rate various aspects of the conference organization, activities, and information provided on a scale. It also asks whether the conference allowed for useful networking and information gathering. Finally, it solicits feedback to help plan future events. The questionnaire aims to evaluate the conference and get opinions to improve future similar events.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Annex 8 Ec Conference Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    noronisa talusob
    15 views3 pages
    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for participants of the conference "Civil Society Development in Southeast Europe: Building Europe Together". The questionnaire asks participants to rate various aspects of the conference organization, activities, and information provided on a scale. It also asks whether the conference allowed for useful networking and information gathering. Finally, it solicits feedback to help plan future events. The questionnaire aims to evaluate the conference and get opinions to improve future similar events.

    Original Description:

    hiuxfdxgchg

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for participants of the conference "Civil Society Development in Southeast Europe: Building Europe Together". The questionnaire asks participants to rate various aspects of the conference organization, activities, and information provided on a scale. It also asks whether the conference allowed for useful networking and information gathering. Finally, it solicits feedback to help plan future events. The questionnaire aims to evaluate the conference and get opinions to improve future similar events.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    15 views3 pages

    Annex 8 Ec Conference Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    noronisa talusob
    This document contains an evaluation questionnaire for participants of the conference "Civil Society Development in Southeast Europe: Building Europe Together". The questionnaire asks participants to rate various aspects of the conference organization, activities, and information provided on a scale. It also asks whether the conference allowed for useful networking and information gathering. Finally, it solicits feedback to help plan future events. The questionnaire aims to evaluate the conference and get opinions to improve future similar events.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Evaluation questionnaire for participants in the conference,

    "Civil Society Development in Southeast Europe: Building Europe Together".

    Your opinion is important for us, in order to help us evaluate this event and plan future ones.
    Please take a few minutes to answer the following questions and give us your comments.
    Thank you.

    1) Please rate the following aspects of the conference organization. If any of these don't apply
    to you, please leave the box empty.

    Very Good Satisfactory Not Bad Not


    good satisfactory applicable
    Invitation
    management

    Information

    Bookings
    (flight/hotel)

    Hotel

    Meals

    Assistance on-site

    2) Please rate the activities you participated in during the conference, in particular with a view
    to their relevance for your work. If you participated in several activities, multiple answers are
    possible:

    17 April Very good Good Satisfactory Not Bad


    satisfactory
    Panel
    discussion
    Workshop on
    Good
    Governance
    Workshop on
    Human Rights
    Workshop on
    Social Inclusion
    Workshop on
    Environmental
    Protection
    Lecture on
    Gender Issues
    Information
    session on
    DECIM
    Information
    session on IPA
    grant
    applications

    18 April Very good Good Satisfactory Not Bad


    satisfactory
    Panel
    discussion
    Workshop on
    IPA
    Workshop on
    Effective
    Campaigning
    Workshop on
    Networking
    Information
    session on IPA
    grant
    applications

    3) In your opinion, the information market-place was (please underline the right answer):

    Very useful 17 = 29,5% Somewhat useful 34 = 60% Not very useful 6 = 10,5 %

    4) In your opinion, did the conference program offer the right balance between information
    gathering and networking possibilities?

    Yes
    No, I would have liked to have more _____________________________

    and less ____________________________

    5) Please rate how well the conference gave you the possibility to do the following:

    Very Well Only Not very Badly


    well OK well
    Establish useful contacts to other Civil
    Society Organizations

    Meet new potential partners

    Make useful contacts with representatives of


    the Commission

    Gather useful information for my field of


    work

    Exchange best practice


    6) Please rate the information you received before the conference, whether per e-mail or on
    the website (please underline the most suitable option):

    Too much Just enough Too little

    7) Please rate the information you received during the conference (please underline the most
    suitable option):

    Too much Just enough Too little

    8) In general, the conference was well prepared

    Agree completely Agree Somewhat disagree Disagree completely

    9) I would like to see a follow-up event to this conference:

    Definitely yes Not sure Definitely no

    10) Please give us any feedback you consider important for us to take into account when
    planning a follow-up event in the future.

    You might also like