Road To Hell
Road To Hell
Road To Hell
0 Summary
John Baker had tried to know the background of Rennalls, four years of his
studies at London University had accentuated racial consciousness and
made him sensitive to any sign of condescension on the part of
expatriates. He acted as ambitious and did not lie in politic manners
because staunch nationalist by serving his country was the best as well.
1
Europeans are bound to occupy senior positions in Barracania. These
prompt the superiority and extraordinary of the Europeans to possess the
positions.
John Baker told Rennalls by criticizing his people do not own as much
experience in the commercial trade as the Europeans or Americans do as
excellent. Rennalls thought that John Baker tried to insult him without
consideration the character sketch of Rennalls. John Bakers objective was
to have a smooth transition for his replacement of his position with
harmonious workplace culture of dignity. This was a threat more than a
friendly reminder from Baker.
To return the plus and minus technique, John Baker congratulated him on
the caliber of the work and the ability to overcome a challenge which
never had to meet as a European. The interview had run along in friendly
manner and ended on such a cheerful note. In the next morning, Rennalls
passed a vital letter to Bakers secretary and dictating that must be sent
off without any delay. At the end, Matthew Rennalls requests John Baker to
accept his resignation.
2
2.0 Problems, Symptoms and Problem Statement
2.1.3 The problem is the perceptual process between Matt Rennalls and
John Baker result in errors of judgment. My ancestors have all been
brought up in this environment for the past 200 or 300 years, and I have,
therefore been able to live in a world in which commerce has been part
and parcel of my being. It has not been something revolutionary and new
that has suddenly entered my life. In your case, the situation is different,
because you and your forebears have had only some 50 or 60 years in this
commercial environment John Baker stated to Matt Rennalls.
3
They should never associate present behaviors of a person with the past
actions of a group of descendants. Rennalls and Baker failed to create a
good impression between them and the dispute happened. These
consistent perpetual errors committed by John Baker and Matt Rennalls
failed in encountering circumstances of working environment.
4
3.2 Cultural diversity training
John Bakers manager or someone from the diversity team needs to have
a conversation with John Baker regarding the inappropriate nature and
comments made during his discussion with Rennalls. It is important that
his behavior changes immediately before it further impacts the
organization in the long term. Therefore, the company could have cultural
diversity training and awareness forum for management. Diversity
management refers to the voluntary organizational actions that are
designed to create greater inclusion of employees from various
backgrounds into the formal and informal organizational structures
through deliberate policies and programs.
It is important that someone reach out to Rennalls and see if they can
rectify the situation. By doing this, John Baker can write a letter to the
father of Rennalls, the minister of finance and economic planning in order
to make himself understood that there was no intention to insult his son
and the different of culture between Europeans and Barracanians was the
main problem of miscommunication happening. John Baker explain his
true intention in conversation when he emphasized a lot on European
employees being more experienced does not mean that he was insulting
Rennalls but positive compliments. Thus, father of Rennalls has to
persuade his son to return back to the company and reconsider for the
resignation as his father can provide some useful advice to his son.
John Baker should make an extraordinary meeting on the same day with
Rennalls and explain in a diplomatic way what he adopts the plus and
minus strategy in order to evolve to a higher competitive standard. John
Baker attempt to clarify the miscommunication that occurred and tells
Rennalls that he was not intentionally behaving as a racist but an old
saying stays true the road to hell is paved with good intention. Thereby
ensuring Rennalls that although he was insulted it was not his intention
and he would be more thoughtful about the comments he makes in the
future. This would clarify and correct the miscommunication that occurred.
5
4.1 List of possible positive and negative outcomes
The positive for this approach is the company will get long run benefits
from cultural diversity training such as provides the knowledge, skills, and
tools to assist team members for behaving differently. Also, if the case
similar with Rennalls and John Maker happen again in future it will also
become more easily for the employees to handle it.
6
a misunderstanding and miscommunication. However, the negative such
as the letter is being denied or not answering at all also might happen.
Besides, there will be a probability of Rennallss father will further
misunderstand John Baker since there was different in culture between
Europeans and Barracanians. Also, writing a letter also consider as a weak
communication method compared to face to face communication.
The best solution for Baker to solve this issue is for him to take the
initiative to conduct a meeting with Matt Rennalls on the same day to
explain the misunderstanding in a diplomatic manner. Baker should
explain the reason he had adopted the plus and minus strategy was to
train Rennalls to evolve to a higher competitive standard.
7
Moreover, the best solution also has a better advantage as
compared to solutions whereby Baker chooses to send letters instead.
Even though sending a letter to explain himself offers a diplomatic
resolution of the conflict between Baker and Rennalls due to cultural
differences, however, it may still worsen the conflict if the words were
written does not translate the real meaning when it is read by Rennalls. As
the Barracanians have high context communication compared to Baker
from the UK which has low context communication, Rennalls might
mistake the written letter for having hidden meanings even when there is
none implied. Sending letters also takes longer time and the problem will
not be solved in real time. Rennalls might ignore and not reply the letter
which does not lead to resolution of the problem. However, the best
solution would be better as a face-to-face meeting allows both parties to
explain and respond in a real-time manner. The chances of
miscommunication are less through direct communication as the message
can be delivered clearly to the other party. This solution offers a higher
chance of a reply from Rennalls and provides resolution of the problem as
well as dissolution for future related problems.
6.0 Implementation
6.1 Short term Implementation
In the short-term implementation, a new meeting between Baker
and Rennalls is mandatory in order to get Rennalls to change his mind
regarding his resignation. To resolve this, it can only be possible if Baker
initiates the situation by explaining to Rennalls that he did not mean to
offend him or any Barracanian and their culture.
The first step Baker should take is to send an official letter to apologize
and request Rennalls to come for the meeting in order to clarify the
matter. In order to not make and further misunderstandings, Baker should
be very careful when preparing the letter. He should ensure himself to
choose his words wisely, showing Rennalls that he respects the
Barracanians and does not mean to offend Rennalls. Baker should show a
willingness to put behind him all the harsh words said by Rennalls in his
resignation letter. Besides that, Baker should also ask Rennalls if he would
like to have the option to meet with the senior draftsman, Jackson, in order
8
to discuss their problems. Another senior member of the company should
be present in order to regulate the meeting and prevent any further
misunderstandings from occurring during the meeting. The regulator
should be on neutral standing and should not choose to take sides to
ensure that both parties are equal.
9
10