3.2. Best & Tyler. 2007

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 34

Commonalities and complementarities 34

References

Abramson, A. S., & Lisker, L. (1970). Discriminability along the voicing continuum:

Cross-language tests. In B. Hla, M. Romportl & P. Janota (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th

International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 569-573). Prague: Academia.

Allen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (2001). Contextual influences on the internal structure of

phonetic categories: A distinction between lexical status and speaking rate. Perception &

Psychophysics, 63, 798-810.

Andruski, J. E., Kuhl, P. K., & Hayashi, A. (1999). Point vowels in Japanese mothers'

speech to infants and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1095-1096.

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004).

Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English

/l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233-250.

Beddor, P. S., Harnsberger, J. D., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Language-specific patterns

of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: Acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal

of Phonetics, 30, 591-627.

Beddor, P. S., & Strange, W. (1982). Cross-language study of perception of the oral-

nasal distinction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1551-1561.

Best, C. T. (1993). Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-

native speech: A window on early phonological development. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S.

de Schonen, P. W. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental

neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life. (pp. 289-304). Dordrecht,

The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Best, C. T. (1994a). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in

infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The


Commonalities and complementarities 35

development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp.

167-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Best, C. T. (1994b). Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English. In C. Rovee-

Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 8, pp. 217-304). Hillsdale, NJ:

Ablex Publishers.

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In

W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language

research (pp. 171-204). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Best, C. T., & Avery, R. A. (1999). Left hemisphere advantage for click consonants is

determined by linguistic significance. Psychological Science, 10, 65-69.

Best, C. T., Faber, A., & Levitt, A. G. (1996). Perceptual assimilation of non-native

vowel contrasts to the American English vowel system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of

America, 99, 2602.

Best, C. T., Hall, P. A., Bohn, O.-S., & Faber, A. (2003). Cross-language perception

of nonnative vowels: Phonological and phonetic effects of listeners native languages. In M. J.

Sol, D. Recasens & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of

Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2889-2892). Barcelona: Causal Productions.

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). American listeners' perception

of nonnative consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to English phonology.

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775-794.

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual

reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking

adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and

Performance, 14, 345-360.


Commonalities and complementarities 36

Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on

cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 305-330.

Best, C. T., Traill, A., Carter, A., Harrison, K. D., & Faber, A. (2003). !X click

perception by English, Isizulu, and Sesotho listeners. In M. J. Sol, D. Recasens & J. Romero

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 853-856).

Barcelona: Causal Productions.

Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign

language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 303-328.

Bohn, O.-S., & Steinlen, A. K. (2003). Consonantal context affects cross-language

perception of vowels. In M. J. Sol, D. Recasens & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th

International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2289-2292). Barcelona: Causal Productions.

Brancazio, L., Miller, J. L., & Par, M. A. (2003). Visual influences on the internal

structure of phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 591-601.

Brannen, K. (2002). The role of perception in differential substitution. The Canadian

Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 47, 1-46.

Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units.

Phonology, 6, 201-251.

Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1990). Representation and reality: physical systems

and phonological structure. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 411-424.

Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview.

Phonetica, 49, 155-180.

Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1995). Dynamics and articulatory phonology. In T.

van Gelder & B. Port (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 175-193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brown, C. A. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental

structure. Second Language Research, 14, 136-193.


Commonalities and complementarities 37

Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., & Bohn, O.-S. (2004). Exploring the intelligibility of

foreign-accented English vowels when English is ill-defined. Journal of Acoustical Society

of America, 115, 2605.

Burnham, D., & Francis, E. (1997). The role of linguistic experience in the perception

of Thai tones. In A. S. Abramson (Ed.), SouthEast Asian Linguistic Studies in Honour of

Vichin Panupong (pp. 29-47). Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Volmer-Conna, U. (2002). What's new, pussycat? On

talking to babies and animals. Science, 296, 1435.

Burnham, D., Tyler, M., & Horlyck, S. (2002). Periods of speech perception

development and their vestiges in adulthood. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske & A. Rohde (Eds.),

An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 281-

300). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

Burnham, D. K. (2000). Excavations in language development: Cross-linguistic

studies of consonant and tone perception. In D. K. Burnham, S. Luksaneeyanawin, C. Davis

& M. Lafourcade (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language processing: The

international conference on human and machine processing of language and speech.

Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Carroll, S. E. (1999). Putting "input" in its proper place. Second Language Research,

15, 337-388.

Cutler, A., Sebastin-Galls, N., Soler-Vilageliu, O., & van Ooijen, B. (2000).

Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons.

Memory & Cognition, 28, 746-755.

Englund, K. T., & Behne, D. M. (2005). Infant directed speech in natural interaction--

Norwegian vowel quantity and quality. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 259-280.
Commonalities and complementarities 38

Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception

research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551-585.

Flege, J. E. (1984). The effect of linguistic experience on Arabs' perception of the

English /s/ vs. /z/ contrast. Folia Linguistica, 18, 117-138.

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign

language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47-

65.

Flege, J. E. (1989). Chinese subjects perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/

contrast: Before and after training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1684-

1697.

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems.

In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language

research (pp. 233-276). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.),

Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. (pp. 101-131). Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic

systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language

development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 217-243). Trier, Germany:

Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native

speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470.

Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1987). A differential effect of release bursts on the stop

voicing judgments of native French and English listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 203-208.
Commonalities and complementarities 39

Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a

second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527-552.

Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1-34.

Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers'

perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,

106, 2973-2987.

Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Fox, R. A. (1994). Auditory and categorical effects on

cross-language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3623-

3641.

Flege, J. E., Schirru, C., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2003). Interaction between the native

and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40, 467-491.

Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language

experience affect Japanese adults' perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of

America, 99, 1161-1173.

Fox, R. A., Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. J. (1995). The perception of English and

Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis.

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2540-2551.

Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or

enrichment? Psychological Review, 62, 32-41.

Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds l and

r. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317-323.

Gottfried, T. L., & Beddor, P. S. (1988). Perception of temporal and spectral

information in French vowels. Language and Speech, 31, 57-75.


Commonalities and complementarities 40

Grieser, D. A., & Kuhl, P. K. (1989). Categorization of speech by infants: Support for

speech-sound prototypes. Developmental Psychology, 25, 577-588.

Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An

investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese

adults' perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107,

2711-2724.

Hall, P. A., Best, C. T., & Bachrach, A. (2003). Perception of /dl/ and /tl/ clusters: A

cross-linguistic perceptual study with French and Israeli listeners. In M. J. Sol, D. Recasens

& J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.

2893-2896). Barcelona: Causal Productions.

Hall, P. A., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. (1999). Phonetic versus phonological influences

on French listeners' perception of American English approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 27,

281-306.

Hall, P. A., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of

Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32,

395-421.

Hall, P. A., Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Meunier, C. (1998). The processing of

illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 592-608.

Harnsberger, J. D. (2000). A cross-language study of the identification of non-native

nasal consonants varying in place of articulation. Acoustical Society of America, 108, 764-

783.

Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and

discrimination on non-native nasal consonants. Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489-503.


Commonalities and complementarities 41

Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S.-G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and

production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1-28.

Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S.-G. (1998). Language, context, and speaker effects in the

identification and discrimination of English of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners.

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1-14.

Iverson, P. (2005). Perceptual interference and learning in speech perception. Paper

presented at the ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception, London, UK.

Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech

using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society

of America, 97, 553-562.

Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1996). Influences of phonetic identification and category

goodness of American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of

America, 99, 1130-1140.

Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann,

A., et al. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native

phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47-B57.

Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and

adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131-161.

Jia, G., Strange, W., Wu, Y., Collado, J., & Guan, Q. (2005, accepted with revisions).

Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: Age-related differences

vary with amount of L2 exposure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Kahn, C. H. (1981). Art and thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge

University Press.

Kingston, J. (2003). Learning foreign vowels. Language and Speech, 46, 295-349.
Commonalities and complementarities 42

Kitamura, C., & Burnham, D. (2003). Pitch and communicative intent in mother's

speech: Adjustments for age and sex in the first year. Infancy, 4, 85-110.

Knoll, M., & Uther, M. (2004). Motherese and Chinese: Evidence for acoustic

changes in speech directed at infants and foreigners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of

America, 116, 2522.

Kochetov, A. (2004). Processing of secondary articulation contrasts in different

syllable positions: Universal and language-particular factors. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa,

32, 24-43.

Kochetov, A., & So, C. K. (2005). Perception of Russian stops by native speakers of

Cantonese and English. Paper presented at the First L2 Speech workshop of the Acoustical

Society of America, Vancouver, Canada.

Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of bilingualism:

Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kuhl, P. K. (1993). Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech

perception: The native language magnet theory. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P.

Jusczyk, P. McNeilage & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face

processing in the first year of life (pp. 259-274). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V.,

Ryskina, V. L., et al. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed

to infants. Science, 277, 684-686.

Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford:

Blackwell.

Lindau, M. (1985). The story of /r/. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics:

Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged (pp. 157-168). New York: Academic Press.
Commonalities and complementarities 43

Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in

comparative phonetics. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR11, 9-15.

Liu, H.-M., Kuhl, P. K., & Tsao, F.-M. (2003). An association between mother's

speech clarity and infants' speech discrimination skills. Developmental Science, 6, F1-F10.

Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1997). On prototypes and phonetic categories: A critical

assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech perception. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1665-1679.

MacKain, K. S., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English

/r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369-390.

Miller, J. L. (1994). On the internal structure of phonetic categories: A progress report.

Cognition, 50, 271-285.

Miller, J. L., Connine, C. M., Schermer, T. M., & Kleunder, K. R. (1983). A possible

auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society

of America, 73, 2124-2133.

Miller, J. L., & Volaitis, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual

structure of a phonetic category. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 505-512.

Pegg, J. E., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Adult and infant perception of two English

phones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3742-3753.

Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic,

and acoustic contributions. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961-2977.

Polka, L. (1992). Characterizing the influence of native experience on adult speech

perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 37-52.

Polka, L. (1995). Lingustic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel

contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286-1296.


Commonalities and complementarities 44

Polka, L., & Bohn, O.-S. (2003). Asymmetries in vowel perception. Speech

Communication, 41, 221-231.

Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative

vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,

20, 421-435.

Singh, L., Morgan, J. L., & Best, C. T. (2002). Infants' listening preferences: Baby talk

or happy talk? Infancy, 3, 365-394.

So, C. K. (2005). The effect of L1 prosodic backgrounds of Cantonese and Japanese

speakers on the perception of Mandarin tones after training. Journal of Acoustical Society of

America, 117, 2427.

Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., & Nishi, K. (2001). Effects

of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese

listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1691-1704.

Strange, W., & Bohn, O.-S. (1998). Dynamic specification of coarticulated German

vowels: Perceptual and acoustical studies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104,

488-504.

Sussman, J. E., & Gekas, B. (1997). Phonetic category structure of [I]: Extent, best

exemplars, and organization. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 40, 1406-1424.

Sussman, J. E., & Lauckner-Morano, V. J. (1995). Further tests of the 'perceptual

magnet effect' in the perception of (i): Identification and change-no-change discrimination.

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 539-552.

Tees, R. C., & Werker, J. F. (1984). Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of

the ability to discriminate nonnative speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38,

579-590.
Commonalities and complementarities 45

Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Flege, J. E. (2005). A

developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and

children. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 263-290.

Veleva, M. (1985). The perception of the voiced/voiceless phonological opposition in

Bulgarian by Arab learners. Supostavitelno Ezikoznanie/Contrastive Linguistics, 10, 28-37.

Volaitis, L. E., & Miller, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of

articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the

Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723-735.

Weber, A. (2001). Help or hindrance: How violation of different assimilation rules

affects spoken-language processing. Language and Speech, 44, 95-118.

Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial

capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672-683.

Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985). Cross-language evidence for three factors in

speech perception. Percpetion & Psychophysics, 37, 35-44.

Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for

perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7,

49-63.

Whalen, D. H., Best, C. T., & Irwin, J. R. (1997). Lexical effects in the perception and

production of American English /p/ allophones. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 501-528.

Yoneyama, K. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of diphthongs in spoken word

processing in Japanese and English. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 50,

163-175.

You might also like