Friedman 2017 Research Writing Workshop
Friedman 2017 Research Writing Workshop
Friedman 2017 Research Writing Workshop
Writing
Workshop
Politecnico di
Milano
January 2017
Part 1
Research
Research:
Etymology: Middle French
recerche, from recercher to go
about seeking, from Old French
recerchier, from re- + cerchier
to search more at SEARCH
Date: 1577 ...
2: studious inquiry or
examination; especially:
investigation or experimentation
aimed at the discovery and
interpretation of facts, revision
of accepted theories or laws in
the light of new facts, or
practical application of such new
or revised theories or laws
10
It [research] is typically
absent from pseudoscience and
ideology.
Synonyms: exploration,
investigation, inquiry.
(Bunge 1999: 251)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
To constitute research,
knowledge creation must
involve investigation or
experimention to discover and
interpret facts, investigation or
experimention to revise
accepted theories or laws in the
light of new facts, or
investigation or experimention
to apply new or revised
theories or laws.
18
19
20
Preliminary
Research
22
23
24
Exploratory
Research
26
28
Three
Research
Frames
Basic Research
Applied Research
Clinical Research
31
32
33
34
35
36
38
39
40
41
42
Many Kinds
of Research
Theoretical
Empirical
Conceptual
44
Qualitative
Quantitative
Descriptive
Interpretive
45
Mathematical
Logical
Philosophical
46
Historical
Textual
Exegetical
Hermeneutic
47
Positive
Normative
48
Phenomenological
49
Practice-led
Practice-based
Generative
Expressive
(These four approaches are the subject of
open questions and ongoing debate.)
50
Research
Methods
Methods
Methodology
Methodics
52
Research methods
are how we do
research.
53
Methodology is the
comparative study
of methods.
54
Methodics is the
comprehensive
repertoire of
methods in a field.
55
Methodological awareness
and methodological sensitivity
involve our ability to understand
research methods and use
them effectively to
answer questions.
56
Methodological awareness
involves such questions as
choice of method, understanding
appropriate methods for
examining kinds of questions, and
awareness of theoretical
presuppositions.
57
58
Part 2
Writing
SWINBURNE DESIGN
60
Perfect research is
never published and
published research is
never perfect.
Johan Olaisen
SWINBURNE DESIGN
61
62
63
64
65
Do
Introduce terms.
Define terms.
66
67
Sources
Excellent sources for definitions and
language work in English:
Merriam-Websters Collegiate
Dictionary
Oxford English Dictionary
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
68
Do
Write carefully.
Build good sentences.
Link related sentences in clear
paragraphs.
Work toward an overall
structure.
69
SWINBURNE DESIGN
70
Elementary Principles
of Composition
Choose a suitable design and
hold to it.
Make the paragraph the unit of
composition.
Use the active voice.
71
72
An Approach to Style
(With a list of reminders)
74
75
Do not overwrite.
Do not overstate.
Avoid the use of qualifiers.
Do not affect a breezy manner.
Use orthodox spelling.
76
77
Be clear.
Do not inject opinion.
Use figures of speech sparingly.
Do not take shortcuts at the cost
of clarity.
78
79
80
Buy it.
Read it.
Use it.
81
82
83
Ten Principles of
Reference and
Citation
(Friedman 2014, 1998)
SWINBURNE DESIGN
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
IMPORTANT
Cite direct quotations carefully
and explicitly.
Cite indirect quotations and
paraphrased quotations carefully
and explicitly.
96
VITAL
Offer evidence.
Provide sources for the evidence
in original work or earlier work.
These are the foundation of
research and the warrant for
research claims.
97
98
99
Beware of These
Common Problems
SWINBURNE DESIGN
100
Dont
It is generally best not to use
footnotes for substantive
content.
Place issues in the body of the
paper or cut them entirely.
101
Dont
Dont use footnotes for
references if a publisher requires
another style.
Footnotes often lead to such
substantive problems as
missing notes, missing details,
inconsistencies, poorly formatted
entries, and confused styles.
102
Part 3
Advice and
Warnings
Necessity
An author is a necessary actor who
should write in the first person in
four specific cases:
105
1
To narrate events that he or she
has witnessed,
106
2
To narrate personal experience,
107
3
To take responsibility for
findings and results, or
108
4
To state an expert or professional
opinion.
109
Dont
An author should not enter the
narrative without good reason.
An author should not narrate
personal involvement unless he or
she is a necessary actor.
110
Dont
NEVER complain about the difficulty
of a research project. State the
challenges and problems, then stop.
NEVER emphasize the work of
writing with such phrases as I
asked myself, or To prepare, I
read many books and articles.
111
Dont
Dont use clichs.
Dont use stock phrases.
112
Dont
Dont use jargon. Use clear terms
in common language.
If you must use a technical term,
explain it in common language or
define it.
113
Dont
Dont use professional,
technical, or scientific terms that
you cannot explain or define.
114
Dont
Dont use words in quotation
marks to indicate that you mean
the word in a special way.
Readers may not know how your
words differ to ordinary
words. You cannot assume that
readers will share the special
meaning that you intend to
indicate.
115
Dont
Dont place a word in quotation
marks to suggest ironic
meaning. Unless readers share
your ideas and assumptions,
they may not understand
intended ironic meaning or
they may recognise your intent
without understanding the
meaning.
116
Dont
Dont use fancy words in an
attempt to seem scholarly or
scientific. If an author does
not understand a word, it is
likely that the reader wont
understand it, either.
117
Warning!
If an author misuses a word
that he or she does not
understand when the reader
does understand it, the
reader may think of the
author as a fraud.
118
Do
Write to make your meaning
clear, understandable, and
explicit. To the greatest degree
possible, write well. If clarity
requires an occasional difficult
passage, prefer clarity. And seek
advice to see whether you can
write the difficult passage more
simply.
119
Good Advice
Start early.
Make a schedule and keep to it.
Read and write.
Revise, rewrite, and polish.
Get advice often.
120
Rhetoric
Develop rhetoric carefully and
Systemically.
Ensure continuity.
State the promise of the paper and
keep the promise.
121
Development
Define terms.
State assumptions. Explain,
clarify, and limit them.
Develop the paper with a sense
of narrative dramaturgy.
122
Do
Clarify issues.
Explain key issues.
Answer what, why, how, and
when.
Use appropriate forms of
demonstration: narrative,
testimony, evidence, and models.
123
Do
Present and address contrary
evidence.
124
Do
Work carefully with tense, time,
and narrative sequence.
Pay careful attention to process.
Make every process description
clear.
125
Do
Use active verbs.
Establish agency.
Represent time flow.
Be clear.
126
Start writing!
127
What to do and
how to do it.
128
An author should:
1 State the theme of the paper.
2 Introduce the subject.
3 Promise a contribution.
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
Writing is a window!
Effective scholarly or scientific
writing enables to reader to see
what the author sees, to
understand what the author
knows, and to make a reasoned
judgment on the authors
conclusions.
137
References
Amsler Robert. 2007. Subject: RE: 20.391 Feynmans
version of Kelvins declaration. Humanist Discussion
Group, Vol. 20, No. 392. London: Centre for Computing
in the Humanities, Kings College London. Date: Fri, 12
Jan 2007, Subject: 20.392 making, saying,
understanding. URL: <http://dhhumanist.org>. Accessed
2015 May 4.
Bunge, Mario. 1999. The Dictionary of Philosophy.
Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
Friedman, Ken. 2014 (1998). Reference, Argument, and
Evidence. Melbourne: Centre for Design Innovation,
Swinburne University of Technology. Archived at URL:
<http://swinburne.academia.edu/KenFriedman> .
Accessed 2015 May 4.
138
139
140
Suggested Citation
Friedman, Ken. 2017. Research Writing Workshop.
Version for Politecnico di Millano. Shanghai, China:
College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University.
141
Publishing History
This edition of the Research Skills Workshop
presentation is designed for the staff and students of
Politecnico di Milano. Earlier versions were presented at
The Shanghai College of Design and Innovation at Tongji
University, Swinburne University of Technology School of
Design, Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of
Design, and at the Design Advanced Research Training
(DART) Doctoral Master Class at Middlesex University
and London Metropolitan University. The DART Doctoral
Master Class was funded by the UK Arts and Humanities
Research Council.
142
143
Acknowledgements
Thanks for suggestions and advice to Dr. Deirdre Barron,
Prof. Charles Burnette, Prof. Cees de Bont, Prof. Lily
Diaz, Prof. David Durling, Dr. Ida Engholm, Prof. Yongqi
Lou, Dr. Joao Lutz, Dr.Jin Ma, Dr. Kristina Niedderer,
Prof. Jack Ox, Dr. Anne Prince, Dr. Thomas Rasmussen,
Prof. Chris Rust, Dr. Chris Smith, Dr. Marilyn C. Smith,
Dr. Simone Taffe, Dr. Byrnjulf Tellefsen, and Prof. Peter
Ullmark.
Copyright 2017 by Ken Friedman. Licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0
International License.
May be copied, quoted, and printed freely.
144
145
Thank you
Copyright 2017 by Ken Friedman. Licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0
International License. May be copied, quoted, and
printed freely.
Version 2017 January 16
SWINBURNE DESIGN
146