Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Wilkins v. Virginia Parole BD, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William W. Wilkins Jr. filed a § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board which was denied by the district court. Wilkins appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The 4th Circuit ruling upheld the district court's denial of relief in Wilkins' § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Wilkins v. Virginia Parole BD, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    William W. Wilkins Jr. filed a § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board which was denied by the district court. Wilkins appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The 4th Circuit ruling upheld the district court's denial of relief in Wilkins' § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7644

    Original Title

    Wilkins v. Virginia Parole Bd, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    William W. Wilkins Jr. filed a § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board which was denied by the district court. Wilkins appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The 4th Circuit ruling upheld the district court's denial of relief in Wilkins' § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Wilkins v. Virginia Parole BD, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William W. Wilkins Jr. filed a § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board which was denied by the district court. Wilkins appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials. The 4th Circuit ruling upheld the district court's denial of relief in Wilkins' § 1983 complaint against the Virginia Parole Board.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7644

    WILLIAM W. WILKINS, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, et al.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
    Judge. (CA-95-1360-AM)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 25, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    William W. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Wilkins v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-95-1360-AM (E.D.
    Va. Sept. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like