Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 21 views

    Washington v. Ryder, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Alvin Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against April Ryder and Doctor Reese which was denied by the district court. Washington appealed the district court's decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Washington v. Ryder, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    21 views2 pages
    Alvin Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against April Ryder and Doctor Reese which was denied by the district court. Washington appealed the district court's decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6654

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Alvin Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against April Ryder and Doctor Reese which was denied by the district court. Washington appealed the district court's decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    21 views2 pages

    Washington v. Ryder, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Alvin Washington filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against April Ryder and Doctor Reese which was denied by the district court. Washington appealed the district court's decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6654

    ALVIN O. WASHINGTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    APRIL RYDER; DOCTOR REESE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-02-575-7)

    Submitted:

    May 29, 2003

    Decided:

    June 6, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alvin O. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.


    Standardsville, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Helen Eckert Phillips,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Alvin O. Washington appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for


    the reasons stated by the district court. See Washington v. Ryder,
    No. CA-02-575-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2003).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like