Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Branch v. Murray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jenis Walter Branch's appeal of the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The court of appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Branch a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Branch v. Murray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jenis Walter Branch's appeal of the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The court of appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Branch a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7587

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jenis Walter Branch's appeal of the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The court of appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Branch a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Branch v. Murray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jenis Walter Branch's appeal of the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The court of appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Branch a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7587

    JENIS WALTER BRANCH,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    EDWARD MURRAY,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-77-AM)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 24, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jenis Walter Branch, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the order denying
    his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988) habeas petition. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    Branch v. Murray, No. CA-94-77-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like