Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Wilson v. Hahn, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gareth Jerome Wilson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in its October 4 and 24, 1995 opinions. Given this ruling, the Court also denied as moot Wilson's motion for release pending appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Wilson v. Hahn, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gareth Jerome Wilson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in its October 4 and 24, 1995 opinions. Given this ruling, the Court also denied as moot Wilson's motion for release pending appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7931

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gareth Jerome Wilson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in its October 4 and 24, 1995 opinions. Given this ruling, the Court also denied as moot Wilson's motion for release pending appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    Wilson v. Hahn, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gareth Jerome Wilson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. As a result, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in its October 4 and 24, 1995 opinions. Given this ruling, the Court also denied as moot Wilson's motion for release pending appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7931

    GARETH JEROME WILSON,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN HAHN, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-95-1063-AM)
    Submitted:

    February 7, 1996

    Decided:

    February 28, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gareth Jerome Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Wilson v. Hahn, No. CA-95-1063-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 & 24,
    1995). In light of this disposition, we deny Appellant's motion for
    release pending appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like