The Impactof Poverty On Children

The impact of poverty on childrens education level
FOR people who want to move forward, education is a necessity. Same with
housing, clothing, and food. In fact, there is the smallest nation or family, education
is a primary requirement. That is, they want to reduce the quality of housing,
clothing, and even food, in order to carry out the education of their children.
SHOULD countries too. If a country wanted to fast forward and succeed in
development, the country's development priorities is education. If necessary, the
sectors that are not essential postponed and funds focused on the development of
education.
COUNTRY has more than 20 years of implementing Compulsory Basic Education 6
years and has 10 years of implementing compulsory 9-year Basic Education. The
purpose and objectives of the implementation of compulsory education is to provide
services to the nation's children to enter school with low cost and affordable by the
ability of the public. If necessary, the six-year primary education should be given
the service for free for six years in elementary education or elementary school for
the basic needs of citizens began to be given. In the nation's primary school
children are given these three basic skills, namely reading, writing, and arithmetic,
as well as various other knowledge base. Any compulsory education will definitely
start from the lowest level, ie elementary school.
As is known, most of the socio-economic situation of our society are poor. In other
words, they are still poor wound predicate. Start Instruction No. 10 of 1971 on the
Development of Primary Schools and Instruction-Instruction later, the country has
been trying to provide affordable education for young people. Tens of thousands of
primary schools have been built and tens of thousands of primary school teachers
appointed to be equal learning opportunities for elementary school level can be
done on the cheap, from cities to villages. All citizens, rich or poor, are given an
equal opportunity to enjoy a six-year primary education whose cost can reach the
poor.
The incident can be enjoyed in a long long time, ie since dicetuskannya Compulsory
Basic Education 6 Year 1984. Unfortunately, the echo of compulsory education was
increasingly weakened by this nation's commitment to compulsory education is not
like when launched. If all this we see that higher education is expensive, too
expensive middle school, junior high as well, now we have seen primary school was
already expensive.
Now we see, nearly all levels of public schools have become institutions for
commercialization are no longer speaking with the requirements prescribed by the
curriculum, but rather the cost of entry to primary school. If it is to be determined
by elementary school age, a child who was seven years old or more must be
accepted as a primary school pupil. This is a provision that should not be
compromised because of the provisions to enter elementary school is based on age.

Presumably the implementation of compulsory education is the slogan of this
country who always touted. Yet, in reality, the implementation of compulsory
education prevented, due to enter elementary school are now paid the price so that
the poor may not be able to pay. Then there was the real thing does not need to
happen if all parties, especially the teachers and school principals, appreciate it
compulsory destination. For communities and rich parents, children will be able to
attend public schools, while the poor will fail and not in school.
To go to a private school, the poor may not be able to afford it. As a result, many
young people are not going to get a chance to obtain an education. What an ironic
thing. Because, on the country's nearly 60 years old, many children will be illiterate
nation as ridden poverty and the country will be dropped because of the quality of
human resources can not compete with the other countries.
AUTHOR This article intentionally focuses on the opportunity to acquire basic
education for six years for citizens at least have to have the ability to elementary
school, with the hope of obtaining further education. By having and equipped with
basic skills, a citizen will have self-esteem, can add insight through literacy, so that
he became a citizen that is not insular, able to receive the update, and enhance its
capabilities.
If the levy practices held schools left and not disciplined, it will be improved many
rows of children who do not attend school because they do not afford. And only the
children of the rich who will receive education from the lowest level up to a high
level. The result of it all, the country will be occupied by the rich and educated who
will form a class of its own in the community.
On the other hand there will be poor and uneducated who are the largest group in
the country. If that happens, it would be the destruction of the structure of society in
the country, which results in social inequality that we do not want. Surprisingly, the
events that just happened in the era of regional autonomy, there should be a
change for the better in the implementation of the educational process. Expected
implementation of educational development in the region would be better because
many areas provide little educational funding, levies should not have happened.
It is a mistake that has been made that such a broad education authority granted to
counties and municipalities. In fact, in areas not yet available educational personnel
qualified to carry out education in the region. Many officials who deal with education
issues do not really know his duty. Much more oversight function the main
requirements in the education process is not working. As a result, many school
principals are likely to take their own decisions in violation of existing regulations,
including implementing fees for school.
ACCORDING writer's observation, the reason for holding the damning charges are
for the welfare of teachers and the development of additional local. Second reason
is the classic reason that happened a long time. However, charges made recently
considered to be unfair because the amount is so large and burdensome, especially

for the poor.
To overcome all of that:
First, poverty should not be the cause of delays in the nation to get an education.
Second, the teacher or the teaching profession is a specialized profession. The
teaching profession is not the same as other civil servants. His job is bound to time
and place. Therefore, the salary the teacher should be different from other civil
servants, so that they can work in peace and not have to think for levies that are
not valid.
Third, if the income of teachers are able to meet the needs principle, various
charges are not expected to occur. If violated various provisions, they should be
penalized.
Fourth, to the manager of education and school committees, there should always be
coordinated with the school so that curricular provisions, especially in the admission
of new students, can work under the terms of the existing

The Impactof Poverty On Children

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Impactof Poverty On Children

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Impactof Poverty On Children

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The impact of poverty on childrens education level

compromised because of the provisions to enter elementary school is based on age.

considered to be unfair because the amount is so large and burdensome, especially

You might also like