Heat Transfer in Nanofluids-A Review
Heat Transfer in Nanofluids-A Review
Heat Transfer in Nanofluids-A Review
STEPHEN U. S. CHOI
Downloaded by [14.139.181.229] at 00:17 22 January 2016
HRISHIKESH E. PATEL
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
Suspended nanoparticles in conventional fluids, called nanofluids, have been the subject of intensive study worldwide
since pioneering researchers recently discovered the anomalous thermal behavior of these fluids. The enhanced thermal
conductivity of these fluids with small-particle concentration was surprising and could not be explained by existing theories.
Micrometer-sized particle-fluid suspensions exhibit no such dramatic enhancement. This difference has led to studies of other
modes of heat transfer and efforts to develop a comprehensive theory. This article presents an exhaustive review of these
studies and suggests a direction for future developments. The review and suggestions could be useful because the literature in
this area is spread over a wide range of disciplines, including heat transfer, material science, physics, chemical engineering
and synthetic chemistry.
INTRODUCTION
that has been adequately reviewed by texts such as those by Duncan and Peterson [1] and Majumdar et al. [2]. However, all of
these texts indicate that the conventional fin-and-microchannel
technology [3] appears to be inadequate for the new generation
of electronic and optical devices. Choi et al. [4] have shown
that power densities of 2000 W/cm2 can be managed by microchannel heat exchangers that use subcooled liquid nitrogen.
An increasing number of studies on microchannel boiling, such
as those by Kandlikar and Grande [5], Bergles et al. [6], and
Thome et al. [7], also indicates the need for an alternative way
to cool micro-size devices. The advent of nanotechnology and
Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) has only intensified this need, asking for a revolution in cooling technology to
keep pace with the new revolution in device technology.
However, it is important to note that miniaturized devices are
not alone in looking for innovative cooling technology. Large
devices (such as transportation trucks) and new energy technology (such as fuel cells) also require more efficient cooling
systems with greater cooling capacities and decreased sizes.
Thus, big or small, new and enhanced cooling technology is
the need of the hour. This need must be met in two ways: introducing new designs for cooling devices, such as microchannels and miniature cryodevices, and enhancing the heat transfer
The last few decades of the twentieth century have seen unprecedented growth in electronics, communication, and computing technologies, and it is likely to continue unabated into
the present century. The exponential growth of these technologies and their devices through miniaturization and an enhanced
rate of operation and storage of data has brought about serious
problems in the thermal management of these devices. Another
important area that has experienced a similar problem in thermal
management is the area of optical devices. Lasers, high-power xrays, and optical fibers are integral parts of todays computation,
scientific measurement, material processing, medicine, material
synthesis, and communication devices. The increasing power of
these devices with decreasing size also calls for innovative cooling technology. Microscale heat transfer is an area of research
This work is supported by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the Department of Science and Technology (DST) of India, and
the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of FreedomCar and Vehicle Technologies
and Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract W-31-109-Eng-38.
Address correspondence to Prof. Sarit Kumar Das, Heat Transfer and Thermal Power Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, IIT Madras,
Chennai 600 036, India. E-mail: sarit [email protected]
S. K. DAS ET AL.
capability of the fluid itself. The present review deals with the
second option. The suspension of nanoparticles in conventional
fluids are usually called nanofluids. Before going into the details of nanofluids and their potential in cooling technology, it is
worth first examining the rationale behind the idea of nanofluids.
1. Higher heat conduction. The large surface area of nanoparticles allows for more heat transfer. Particles finer than 20 nm
carry 20% of their atoms on their surface, making them instantaneously available for thermal interaction. Another advantage is the mobility of the particles, attributable to the
tiny size, which may bring about micro-convection of fluid
and hence increased heat transfer. The micro-convection and
increased heat transfer may also increase dispersion of heat
in the fluid at a faster rate. It is already found that the thermal
conductivity of nanofluids increases significantly with a rise
in temperature [17], which may be attributed to the above
reasons.
2. Stability. Because the particles are small, they weigh less,
and the chances of sedimentation are also less. This reduced
sedimentation can overcome one of the major drawbacks of
suspensions, the settling of particles, and make the nanofluids
more stable.
3. Microchannel cooling without clogging. Nanofluids will not
only be a better medium for heat transfer in general, but they
will also be ideal for microchannel applications where high
heat loads are encountered. The combination of microchannels and nanofluids will provide both highly conducting fluids and a large heat transfer area. This cannot be attained
with meso- or micro-particles because they clog microchannels. Nanoparticles, which are only a few hundreds or thousands of atoms, are orders of magnitude smaller than the
microchannels.
4. Reduced chances of erosion. Nanoparticles are very small,
and the momentum they can impart to a solid wall is much
smaller. This reduced momentum reduces the chances of erosion of components, such as heat exchangers, pipelines and
pumps.
5. Reduction in pumping power. To increase the heat transfer of
conventional fluid by a factor of two, pumping power must
usually be increased by a factor of ten. It can be shown that
vol. 27 no. 10 2006
S. K. DAS ET AL.
S. K. DAS ET AL.
Ceramic Nanofluids
Ceramic nanofluids were the first type of nanofluid investigated by the ANL group. The first major publication in this
area [18] presented conductivity measurements on fluids that
contained Al2 O3 and CuO nanoparticles in water and ethylene glycol. Conductivity was measured by the traditional transient hot-wire (THW) method. The results clearly indicated that
the thermal conductivity enhancement of the Al2 O3 and CuO
nanofluids were high. They used volume fractions of only 1
5%. The enhancement was higher when ethylene glycol was the
base fluid. An enhancement of 20% was observed at 4% volume
fraction of CuO. The enhancement when water was the base
fluid was lower but still substantial, with 12% enhancement at
3.5% CuO, and 10% enhancement with 4% Al2 O3 . (Figure 1
shows the original publications measurements [18].) These results were high when compared with the model for suspensions
proposed by Maxwell [8], which was improved in 1962 [9] to
include the effect of particle shape. These models predict the
effective thermal conductivity as essentially a weighted average of solid and liquid conductivity derived from a point source
method. The original Maxwell model reads as follows:
keff
3(k p /k f 1)
=1+
kf
(k p /k f + 2) (k p /k f 1)
(1)
(2)
In both models, keff = effective thermal conductivity of suspension, k f = thermal conductivity of liquid, k p = thermal
Figure 1 Enhanced thermal conductivity of oxide nanofluids systems as measured by Lee et al. [18]. k/ko denotes the ratio of thermal conductivity of
nanofluid to that of the base fluid.
Figure 2 Increase of the thermal conductivity ratio obtained by Lee et al. and
predicted by the Hamilton-Crosser model for (a) Al2 O3 /water nanofluids and
(b) CuO/water nanofluids [18]. k/ko denotes the ratio of thermal conductivity
of nanofluid to that of the base fluid.
S. K. DAS ET AL.
Metallic Nanofluids
Even though the potential of nanofluids was evident from
ceramic nanofluids, the emergence of metallic particle-based
nanofluids was a big step forward. Xuan and Li [19] were the
first to try copper particle-based nanofluids of transformer oil.
Though they used much larger (100 nm) particles, the enhancement reported was 55% with 5% volume fraction.
However, the real breakthrough came when the ANL group
reported a 40% enhancement of conductivity with only 0.3%
concentration of 10 nm-sized copper particles suspended in ethylene glycol [22]. This report clearly showed the particle size effect and the potential of nanofluids with smaller particles. The
nanofluids were stabilized with thioglycolic acid. Figure 3 shows
the measured values of thermal conductivity for Cuethylene
glycol nanofluids. In another study, Patel et al. [27] used gold
and silver for the first time to prepare nanofluids. They also used
a transient hot wire method for measuring thermal conductivity.
The most important observation in their study was a perceptible enhancement in thermal conductivity for vanishingly small
concentrations. It was reported that at room temperature, the
conductivity of toluene-gold nanofluid was enhanced by 37%
for a volume fraction of only 0.0050.011%, whereas the enhancement for watergold nanofluid was 3.25% for a vanishingly small concentration of 0.00130.0026% volume fraction.
The main reason for such an enhancement was the small size
(1020 nm) of the particles. The enhancement was greater
with water-based nanofluids because bare particles were used,
and was lower for toluene-based nanofluids where the nanoparticles were protected by a layer of thiolate coating, which was
used to prevent agglomeration. Another important observation
of their study was the relatively lower conductivity of water
heat transfer engineering
S. K. DAS ET AL.
Temperature Effect
S. K. DAS ET AL.
Patel et al. [27] reconfirmed the findings of Lee et al. [18] and
Chon et al. [39] and confirmed the temperature effect obtained
by Das et al. [17]. They also showed the inverse dependence
of particle size on the thermal conductivity enhancement with
three sizes of alumina nanoparticles suspended in water.
THEORIES ON NANOFLUIDS
Since Choi [12] proposed his theory on nanofluids, a continuous effort has ensued to look for the causes of the so-called
anomalous increase in thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Starting from simple Brownian motion to complicated fractals, many
propositions have been tested. During the last three years, this
effort of modeling the nanofluid behavior has intensified; however, it appears that the truth is still to be revealed.
Traditional theories [e.g., 810, 4042] explained the thermal conductivity enhancement of usual slurries and suspensions
quite extensively. The basic model of Maxwell [8] was extended
by the investigators who included the effect of shape [9], particle
interactions [4347], and particle distribution [48]. The Bruggeman model [40] has a similar nature plus the advantage of being
heat transfer engineering
10
S. K. DAS ET AL.
collisions between base fluid molecules (i.e., thermal conductance of fluid); thermal diffusion in nanoparticles; a collision
between nanoparticles due to Brownian motion, which by orderof-magnitude analysis, was neglected; and thermal interaction
of dynamic nanoparticles with the base fluid. Brownian motion
produced convection-like effects at nanoscale. As particle size is
decreased, random motion becomes larger, and convection-like
effects become dominant. This model was able to predict a particle size- and temperature-dependent conductivity accurately.
Kumar et al. [66] presented a model that accounts for the
dependence of thermal conductivity on particle size, concentration, and temperature. The proposed model has two aspects.
The stationary particle model accounts for the geometrical effect of an increase in surface area per unit volume with decreasing particle size. It assumes two parallel paths of heat flow
through the suspension, one through the liquid particles, and
the other through the nanoparticles. Here, the direct dependence
of thermal conductivity enhancement on volume fraction and
the inverse dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement
on particle diameter have been suggested. In the moving particle model, the effective thermal conductivity of particles is
modeled by drawing a parallel to the kinetic theory of gases.
Predictions from the combined model agree with experimentally observed values of conductivity enhancement of nanofluids with a vanishingly small particle concentration. They also
showed, by order-of-magnitude analysis, that the value of the
constant c, which is used in the modeling of effective thermal
conductivity of particles, is consistent with that predicted by
kinetic theory. However, in the Jang and Choi [65] and Kumar
et al. [66] models, the constant used is empirical and varies over
several orders of magnitude for different combinations of the
particle-fluid mixture.
A similar approach was adopted by Ren et al. [67], who considered kinetic theory-based micro-convection and liquid layering in addition to liquid and particle conduction. The model is
working well for ceramic particle suspensions. They also considered a fixed nanolayer thickness of 2 nm and determined the
thermal conductivity of the nanolayer as the volume-averaged
thermal conductivity of the base liquid and particles.
Prasher et al. [68] have presented another model in the same
vein. They modeled the thermal conductivity of solid particles
from the kinetic theory of gases and incorporated the contribution of Brownian motion-based convection to total heat transport
in the effective medium approach-based thermal conductivity
equation. The Brownian motion velocity considered is based on
the equi-partition theorem, whereas the velocities of particles
considered for modeling the thermal conductivity of nanoparticles is phonon velocity. For the first time, they considered the
effect of multiparticle convection. The model is working well
for ceramic particle-based nanofluids for particular values of
constants used in modeling.
Recently, Patel et al. [69] have modeled the thermal conductivity of nanofluid empirically with a new, semiempirical approach. High enhancements are attributed to the increase in the specific surface area and Brownian motion-based
vol. 27 no. 10 2006
S. K. DAS ET AL.
micro-convection. The micro-convection is modeled with empiricism in the Nusselt number definition. With that, the model
is working extremely well over a wide range of nanofluid combinations and parameters. Similarly, a completely empirical model
[39] provides a correlation for alumina nanofluids by fitting a
curve through regression analysis to the existing experimental
data. In this model, when micro-convection around particles is
modeled, the mean free path of liquid molecules is considered
as a characteristic length to derive the diffusive velocities of the
particles.
Bhattacharya et al. [70] also performed Brownian dynamics
simulation to determine the effective conductivity of nanofluids. The simulation results were within 3% of experimental data
for Al2 O3 ethylene glycol and in nearly full agreement with
Cuethylene glycol. Recently, Xuan and Yao [71] developed a
Lattice Boltzmann model to investigate nanoparticle distribution
and flow pattern and found that the main flow and rising temperature of the fluid can improve nanoparticle distribution, which
is beneficial to energy transport enhancement of the nanofluids.
Nan et al. [72] have presented a simple formula for thermal conductivity enhancement in CNT composites that is derived from the Maxwell-Garnett model [52] by the effective
medium approach. The model overpredicts the enhancement in
the thermal conductivity of CNT suspensions when calculated
with typical values of CNT thermal conductivities. The same
authors have also developed a new model [73] by incorporating
interface thermal resistance with an effective medium approach.
However, the model needs the thermal resistance value at the
surface of CNTs, which is difficult to get for different types of
CNTs and their combinations with different solvents.
Thus, various models and mechanisms that depend on an
extension of classical theory, liquid layering, particle aggregation, and particle movement have been developed in an effort to
explain the nanofluid behavior. However, the success of these
models has been very limited, and no clear picture has emerged
until recently.
CONVECTION IN NANOFLUIDS
It must be understood that thermal conductivity enhancement
in nanofluids only creates a necessary condition for its usage;
the sufficient condition comes from the hard evidence of the
performance of these fluids in convective environments.
The first question that arises in the convection of nanofluids
is, what is the fluid mechanics of nanofluids? This is important
because many colloidal and biological suspensions show strong
non-Newtonian behavior. Wang et al. [21] measured the viscosity of nanofluids by three methods and did not observe any
non-Newtonian effects. They found a 30% increase in viscosity
for the Al2 O3 -water nanofluid when compared with pure water
at 3% volume concentration of the particles. However, Pak and
Cho [74] measured the viscosity to be much higher. Choi et al.
[75] indicated that the discrepancy may be due to the electrostatic repulsion technique used, which may not be suitable for
heat transfer engineering
11
Figure 7 Viscosity of Al2 O3 nanofluid at various temperatures and concentrations [76]. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
12
S. K. DAS ET AL.
L
D
1/3
(3)
b
w
0.14
S. K. DAS ET AL.
enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure. The effective stagnant thermal conductivity [10] with an enhancement term due to
thermal dispersion in porous media was used for the modeling.
A wide range of numerical experiments with varying Grashof
number and volume fraction were performed. The results show
that nanofluids behave more like a fluid than a conventional
solid/fluid mixture. Kim et al. [88] analytically investigated convective instability driven by buoyancy and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids. They proposed a factor that describes the
effect of nanoparticle addition on the convective instability and
heat transfer characteristics of a base fluid. The results show
that as the density and heat capacity of nanoparticles increase
and the thermal conductivity and shape factor of nanoparticles
decrease, the convective motion in a nanofluid sets in easily.
Recently, Daungthongsuk and Wongwises [89] summarized
and reviewed the published articles that are pertinent to the
forced convective heat transfer of the nanofluids of both experimental and numerical investigations. Maiga et al. [90] numerically investigated the forced convective heat transfer of nanofluids. They considered local thermal equilibrium and assumed that
the nanofluid behaved as a conventional single-phase fluid with
properties evaluated as functions of those of the constituents,
knowing their respective concentrations. In their analysis, they
used the Hamilton-Crosser model [9] to model the effective thermal conductivity of the nanofluid. The use of this model is highly
questionable because the model does not bring in the anomalous
thermal conductivity enhancement observed in experiments. In
another recent study, using a two-component, four-equation,
nonhomogeneous equilibrium model for convective transport,
Boungiorno et al. [91] conducted a numerical study of the turbulent heat transfer of nanofluids. In the model, the wall layer
consisted of two regions, both of which were considered: the
viscous sublayer and the turbulent sublayer. Viscosity and particle volume fraction were less in the viscous sublayer, whereas
conductivity in that region was greater. The heat transfer enhancement was explained mainly by a reduction in viscosity
within and the consequent thinning of the viscous sublayer, and
a new correlation was developed that agreed with existing experimental results.
BOILING IN NANOFLUIDS
Often, the results of heat transfer studies are in the direction opposite to what intuition might suggest. Encouraged by
the enhancement of thermal conductivity, Das et al. [76] used
nanofluids for boiling applications, but the results were negative.
The effect of nanofluids on boiling was deteriorating with oxide
nanoparticles suspension, as shown in Figure 8. In Figures 9a
and 9b, the nondimensional plot of boiling Reynolds number
versus boiling Nusselt number shows that the deterioration is
greater on a rough surface (Ra = 1.15 m) than on a smooth
surface (Ra = 0.4 m). While investigating the reason for this,
the investigators found that the nanoparticles plugged the microsized surface cavities, thus reducing the nucleation site density,
heat transfer engineering
13
Figure 8 Pool boiling characteristic of nanofluids [76]. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier. Ra denotes the roughness parameter, (T w T s) is the
wall superheat, and q is the input heat flux.
the prime cause of deterioration of boiling. The deterioration increased with reducing diameter of narrow tubes [92], as shown
in Figure 10. However, the investigators indicated that, even
the deterioration can have a practical application in that it involves engineered fluids that will inhibit boiling or boil at a
preassigned surface temperature, a characteristic that may be
important for heat treatment or material processing. This predicted practical application proved to be correct when Tsai et al.
[93] used nanofluids in heat pipes to delay a boiling limit. However, the need to investigate whether suspended nanoparticles
can act as nucleation sites to provide homogeneous nucleation
in the situation when heating is done volumetrically with the
help of sources such as microwaves or LASERs still remains.
In another study, You et al. [94] measured the critical heat
flux (CHF) in the pool boiling of Al2 O3 water nanofluids. They
discovered an unprecedented phenomenon: a three-fold increase
in CHF over that of pure water at the mass fraction O (105 ).
The average size of departing bubbles increased and the bubble
frequency decreased significantly in nanofluids when compared
with those in pure water. Vassallo et al. [95] confirmed these
results in similar studies on SiO2 nanoparticles. They observed
a two- to three-fold increase in CHF, as shown in Figure 11.
vol. 27 no. 10 2006
14
S. K. DAS ET AL.
Figure 9 Nusselt number (Nu)Reynolds number (Re) plots for nanofluids on (a) smoother heater and (b) roughened heater [76]. Reprinted with permission
from Elsevier. Ra denotes the roughness parameter.
Later, Bang and Chang [96] observed similar phenomena during their pool boiling studies with wateralumina nanofluid. The
measured pool boiling curves of nanofluids saturated at 60 C
demonstrated that the CHF increased dramatically (a 200% increase) when compared with pure water; however, the nucleate
Figure 11 Critical heat-flux increase in nanofluids [95]. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
S. K. DAS ET AL.
APPLICATIONS OF NANOFLUIDS
While applying nanofluids for commercial cooling, Tzeng
et al. [98] studied the effect of nanofluids when used as engine
coolants. CuO (4.4% wt) and Al2 O3 (4.4% wt) nanoparticles and
antifoam were individually mixed with automatic transmission
oil. The experimental platform was a real-time four-wheel-drive
(4WD) transmission system. The experimental results showed
that, under the similar conditions, antifoamoil provided the
highest temperature distribution in rotary blade coupling and,
accordingly, the worst heat transfer effect, and CuOoil provided
the lowest temperature distribution both at high and low rotating
speed and, accordingly, the best heat transfer effect.
Gosselin and Silva [99] explored the optimization of particle
fraction for maximizing the thermal performance of nanofluid
flows under appropriate constraints. They argued that when few
particles are present, the heat transfer rate that is achieved is
small, whereas too many particles lead to large shear stresses
and large required pumping power. This competition reveals a
trade-off opportunity to maximize the heat transfer rate at constant pumping power by selecting the appropriate amount of
particles. Using nanofluids as coolants, Chein and Huang [100]
numerically considered silicon microchannel heat sink performance. The nanofluid was a mixture of pure water and nanoscale
Cu particles at various volume fractions. Due to the increased
thermal conductivity and thermal dispersion effects, they found
that performance was greatly improved when nanofluids were
used as the coolant. In addition, they observed that the presence
of nanoparticles in the fluid did not produce any extra presheat transfer engineering
15
sure drop because of small particle size and low particle volume
fraction.
Koo and Kleinstreuer [101] numerically investigated the conjugate heat transfer problem for microheat sinks considering
two types of nanofluids (i.e., CuO nanospheres at low volume
concentrations in water and in ethylene glycol). The effect of
Brownian motion on the effective fluid viscosity was considered and found to be less significant than that on the effective
thermal conductivity. Based on the studies, they suggested that
high Prandtl number fluids and thermal conductivity nanoparticles be used to attain better microchannel heat transfer. They
suggested that to minimize particleparticle and particlewall
interactions, particles with a dielectric constant close to that of
the base fluid and a wall material such that particlewall attraction is minimized should be selected.
16
S. K. DAS ET AL.
studies that assume a liquid shell around the particles that behave
like solids have also been performed. The predictions, however,
were matched with adjustable parameters of shell thickness and
shell conductivity that are questionable. Some of the studies
modeled both oxide nanofluids and carbon nanotube nanofluids.
These studies are commendable. The efforts to include particle
motion in the form of Brownian motion appear to be controversial, and these efforts need to be revisited, particularly with
respect to temperature effect. A very encouraging concept is
the nano-convection of fluid around the particles due to their
motion. In this concept, the particles transport some amount of
heat with them and contribute to the total heat transfer through
agitation in the liquid. From a physical point of view, this phenomenon seems to be a potential explanation for the behavior of
nanofluids. It is important that any model that is developed in the
future be tested against much more data on ceramic-, metallic-,
and nanotube-based nanofluids, and with respect to temperature
rather than the present practice of testing with a limited range of
measurements. Also, if the model contains adjustable parameters, their values should be justified by the physics of the problem
rather than by simple empirical treatment.
Finally, studies on the convective energy transport of nanofluids, both with and without phase change, have just begun. Experimental work in the convective heat transfer of nanofluids
is still scarce. Many issues, such as thermal conductivity, the
Brownian motion of particles, particle migration, and variable
property change with temperature, must be carefully considered
while modeling convection. Boiling heat transfer seems to be
affected by the plugging of nucleation sites, but critical heat flux
seems to be enormously enhanced; the physical phenomenon
behind this is unclear. However, all of the convective studies
have been performed with oxide particles, and it should be interesting to know the energy transport with low-concentration
nanofluids with metallic particles as well as additional effects,
such as the application of microwaves. Future convective studies
should first be performed with metallic nanoparticles in standard
geometries to consider heat transfer enhancement, transition to
turbulence, and hydraulic behavior. The studies can then be expanded to include complex geometries and methods of computational modeling. Application-oriented research in nanofluids
is in its infancy and is expected to grow at a faster rate in the
foreseeable future; only this will define the future of nanofluids
and its present promises.
REFERENCES
[1] Duncan, A. B., and Peterson, G. P., Review of Microscale Heat
Transfer, Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 397
428, 1994.
[2] Majumdar, A., in Microscale Energy Transport in Solids, eds. C.
L. Tien, A. Majumdar, and F. Gerner, Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., 1998.
[3] Tuckerman, D. B., and Pease, R. F. W, High Performance Heat
Sinking for VLSI, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 2, pp. 126
129, 1981.
[4] Choi, S. U. S., Rogers, C. S., and Mills, D. M., in Micromechanical Systems, eds. D. Cho, J. P. Peterson, A. P. Pisano, and
C. Friedrich, vol. DSC 40, pp. 8389, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1992.
[5] Kandlikar, S. G., and Grande, W. J., Evolution of Microchannel
Flow PassagesThermohydraulic Performance and Fabrication
Technology, Heat Transfer Engineering, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 317,
2002.
[6] Bergles, A. E., Lienhard, J. H., Kendall, G. E., and Griffith,
P., Boiling and Evaporation in Small Diameter Channels, Heat
Transfer Engineering, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1840, 2003.
[7] Thome, J. R., Dupont, V., and Jacobi, A. M., Heat Transfer Model
for Evaporation in Microchannels. Part I: Presentation of the
Model, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol.
47, no. 1416, pp. 33753385, 2004.
[8] Maxwell, J. C., A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd
ed., vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1881.
[9] Hamilton, R. L., and Crosser, O. K., Thermal Conductivity of
Heterogeneous Two Component Systems, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 187191,
1962.
[10] Wasp, E. J., Kenny, J. P., and Gandhi, R. L., Solid-Liquid
Flow Slurry Pipeline Transportation, Series on Bulk Materials
Handling, Trans. Tech. Publications, 1:4, Clausthal, Germany,
1977.
[11] Zhao, C. Y., and Lu, T. J., Analysis of Microchannel Heat Sinks
for Electronics Cooling, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 45, no. 24, pp. 48574869, 2002.
[12] Choi, S. U. S., Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Fluids
with Nanoparticles, in Developments and Applications of NonNewtonian Flows, eds. D. A. Singer and H. P. Wang, vol. FED
231, pp. 99105, American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
New York, 1995.
[13] Pozhar, L. A., Kontar, E. P., and Hua, M. Z. C., Transport Properties of Nanosystems: Viscosity of Nanofluids Confined in Slit
Nanopores, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 2,
no. 2, pp. 209227, 2002.
[14] Pozhar, L. A., Structure and Dynamics of Nanofluids: Theory
and Simulations to Calculate Viscosity, Physical Review E, vol.
61, no. 2, pp. 14321446, 2000.
[15] Pozhar, L. A., and Gubbins, K. E., Quasihydrodynamics of
Nanofluid Mixtures, Physical Review E, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 5367
5396, 1997.
[16] Kim, P., Shi, L., Majumdar, A., and McEuen, P. L., Thermal Transport Measurements of Individual Multiwalled Nanotubes, Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 21, pp. 21550214,
2001.
[17] Das, S. K., Putra, N., Thiesen, P., and Roetzel, W., Temperature
Dependence of Thermal Conductivity Enhancement for Nanofluids, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 125,
pp. 567574, 2003.
[18] Lee, S., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., and Eastman, J. A., Measuring
Thermal Conductivity of Fluids Containing Oxide Nanoparticles, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 121,
pp. 280289, 1999.
[19] Xuan, Y., and Li, Q., Heat Transfer Enhancement of Nano-Fluids,
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, vol. 21, pp. 5864,
2000.
[20] Gleiter, H., Nanocrystalline Materials, Progress in Materials Science, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 223315, 1989.
S. K. DAS ET AL.
[21] Wang, X., Xu, X., and Choi, S. U. S., Thermal Conductivity of
Nanoparticle-Fluid Mixture, Journal of Thermophysics and Heat
Transfer, vol. 13, pp. 474480, 1999.
[22] Eastman, J. A., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., Yu, W., and Thompson, L. J., Anomalously Increased Effective Thermal Conductivities of Ethylene Glycol Based Nanofluids Containing Copper
Nanoparticles, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 718
720, 2001.
[23] Eastman, J. A., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., and Thompson, L. J.,
Enhanced Thermal Conductivity through the Development of
Nanofluids, Proc. Symp. on Nanophase and Nanocomposite Materials II, Materials Research Society, Boston, vol. 457, pp. 311,
1997.
[24] Eastman, J. A., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., Soyez, G., Thompson, L. J.,
and DiMelfi, R. J., Novel Thermal Properties of Nanostructured
Materials, Journal of Metastable Nanocrystalline Materials, vol.
2, pp. 629637, 1998.
[25] Xie, H., Wang, J., Xi, T., and Liu, Y., Thermal Conductivity of
Suspensions Containing Nanosized SiC Particles, International
Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 571580, 2002.
[26] Andrews, R., Jacques, D., Rao, A. M., Derbyshire, F., Qian, D.,
Fan, X., Dickey, E. C., and Chen, J., Continuous Production
of Aligned Carbon Nanotubes: A Step Closer to Commercial
Realization, Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 303, pp. 467474,
1999.
[27] Patel, H. E., Das, S. K., Sundararajan, T., Sreekumaran, N. A.,
George, B., and Pradeep, T., Thermal Conductivities of Naked
and Monolayer Protected Metal Nanoparticle Based Nanofluids: Manifestation of Anomalous Enhancement and Chemical
Effects, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 14, pp. 29312933,
2003.
[28] Zhu, H. T., Lin, Y. S., and Yin, Y. S., A Novel One-Step Chemical
Method for Preparation of Copper Nanofluids, Journal of Colloid
and Interface Science, vol. 277, pp. 100103, 2004.
[29] Xie, H. Q., Wang, J. C., Xi, T. G., Liu, Y., Ai, F., and Wu, Q. R.,
Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of Suspensions Containing
Nanosized Alumina Particles, Journal of Applied Physics, vol.
91, no. 7, pp. 45684572, 2002.
[30] Murshed, S. M. S., Leong, K. C., and Yang, C., Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of TiO2-Water Based Nanofluids, International Journal of Thermal Science, vol. 44, pp. 367373, 2005.
[31] Xie, H. Q., Wang, J. C., Xi, T. G., Liu, Y., and Ai, F., Dependence
of Thermal Conductivity of Nanoparticles-Fluid Mixture on the
Base Fluid, Journal of Material Science Letters, vol. 21, pp.
14691471, 2002.
[32] Hong, T. K., Yang, H. S., and Choi, C. J., Study of the Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Fe Nanofluids, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 06431114, 2005.
[33] Choi, S. U. S., Zhang, Z. G., Yu, W., Lockwood, F. E., and Grulke,
E. A., Anomalous Thermal Conductivity Enhancement in NanoTube Suspensions, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, pp. 2252
2254, 2001.
[34] Biercuk, M. J., Llaguno, M. C., Radosavljevic, M., Hyun, J. K.,
Johnson, A. T., and Fischer, J. E., Carbon Nanotube Composites
for Thermal Management, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, pp.
27672772, 2002.
[35] [35] Xie, H., Lee, H., Youn, W., and Choi, M., Nanofluids
Containing Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Enhanced
Thermal Conductivities, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 94, pp.
49674971, 2003.
17
18
S. K. DAS ET AL.
[53] Pitchumani, R., and Yao, S. C., Correlation of Thermal Conductivities of Unidirectional Fibrous Composites Using Local Fractal Techniques, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Heat Transfer,
vol. 113, pp. 788796, 1991.
[54] Xue, Q. Z., Model for Effective Thermal Conductivity of
Nanofluids, Physics Letters A, vol. 307, pp. 313317, 2003.
[55] Xue, Q. Z., Model for Thermal Conductivity of Carbon
Nanotube-Based Composites, Physica B, vol. 368, pp. 302307,
2005.
[56] Xue, Q., and Xu, W. M., A Model of Thermal Conductivity
of Nanofluids with Interfacial Shells, Materials Chemistry and
Physics, vol. 90, pp. 298301, 2005.
[57] Schwartz, L. M., Garboczi, E. J., and Bentz, D. P., Interfacial
Transport in Porous Media: Application to DC Electrical Conductivity of Mortars, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 78, no. 10,
pp. 58985908, 1995.
[58] Xie, H., Fujii, M., and Zhang, X., Effect of Interfacial Nanolayer
on the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Nanoparticle-Fluid
Mixture, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol.
48, pp. 29262932, 2005.
[59] Yu, C. J., Richter, A. G., Datta, A., Durbin, M. K., and Dutta, P.,
Molecular Layering in a Liquid on a Solid Substrate: An X-Ray
Reflectivity Study, Physica B, vol. 283, pp. 2731, 2000.
[60] Xue, L., Phillpot, S. R., Choi, S. U. S., and Eastman, J. A., Effect
of Liquid Layering at the LiquidSolid Interface on Thermal
Transport, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol.
47, pp. 42774284, 2004.
[61] Wojnar, R., The Brownian Motion in a Thermal Field, Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 333349, 2001.
[62] Gitterman, M., Brownian Motion in Fluctuating Media, Physical
Review E, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 303306, 1995.
[63] Yu, W., Hull, J. H., and Choi, S. U. S., Stable and Highly Conductive NanofluidsExperimental and Theoretical Studies, Proc.
6th ASME-JSME Thermal Engineering Joint Conf., Hawaiian
Islands, March 1623, 2003, Paper no. TED-AJ03-384, ASME,
New York, 2003.
[64] Xuan, Y., Li, Q., and Hu, W., Aggregation Structure and Thermal
Conductivity of Nanofluids, AIChE Journal, vol. 49, no. 4, pp.
10381043, 2003.
[65] Jang, S. P., and Choi, S. U. S., Role of Brownian Motion in the
Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids, Applied Physics
Letters, vol. 84, no. 21, pp. 43164318, 2004.
[66] Hemanth, K. D., Patel, H. E., Rajeev, K. V. R., Sundararajan,
T., Pradeep, T., and Das, S. K., Model for Heat Conduction in
Nanofluids, Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 14, pp. 144301
14, 2004.
[67] Ren, Y., Xie, H., and Cai, A., Effective Thermal Conductivity
of Nanofluids Containing Spherical Nanoparticles, Journal of
Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 38, pp. 39583961, 2005.
[68] Prasher, R., Bhattacharya, P., and Phelan, P. E., Thermal Conductivity of Nanoscale Colloidal Solutions (Nanofluids), Physical
Review Letters, vol. 94, pp. 02590114, 2005.
[69] Patel, H. E., Sundararajan, T., Pradeep, T., Dasgupta, A., Dasgupta, N., and Das, S. K., A Micro-convection Model for Thermal
Conductivity of Nanofluids, Pramana - Journal of Physics, vol.
65, pp. 863869, 2005.
[70] Bhattacharya, P., Saha, S. K., Yadav, A., Phelan, P. E., and
Prasher, R. S., Brownian Dynamics Simulation to Determine
the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids, Journal of
Applied Physics, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 64926494, 2004.
[71] Xuan, Y., and Yao, Z., 2004, Lattice Boltzmann Model for
Nanofluids, Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 199
205, 2005.
[72] Nan, C. W., Shi, Z., and Lin, Y., A Simple Model for Thermal
Conductivity of Carbon Nanotube-Based Composites, Chemical
Physics Letters, vol. 375, pp. 666669, 2003.
[73] Nan, C. W., Liu, G., Lin, Y., and Li, M., Interface Effect on
Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Nanotube Composites, Applied
Physics Letters, vol. 85, pp. 35493551, 2004.
[74] Pak, B., and Cho, Y. I., Hydrodynamic and Heat Transfer Study
of Dispersed Fluids with Submicron Metallic Oxide Particle,
Experimental Heat Transfer, vol. 11, pp. 151170, 1998.
[75] Choi, S. U. S., Zhang, Z. G., and Keblinski, P., Nanofluids, in
Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, ed. H. S.
Nalwa, vol. 6, pp. 757773, American Scientific Publishers, Los
Angeles, Calif., 2004.
[76] Das, S. K., Putra, N., and Roetzel, W., Pool Boiling Characteristics of Nano-Fluids, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 851862, 2003.
[77] Xuan, Y., and Roetzel, W., Conceptions for Heat Transfer Correlation of Nano-fluids, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 43, pp. 37013707, 2000.
[78] Putra, N., Roetzel, W., and Das, S. K., Natural Convection of
Nano-Fluids, Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 39, no. 89, pp. 775
784, 2003.
[79] Wen, D., and Ding, Y., Formulation of Nanofluids for Natural
Convective Heat Transfer Applications, International Journal of
Heat and Fluid Flow, vol. 26, pp. 855864, 2005.
[80] Khanafer, K., Vafai, K., and Lightstone, M., Buoyancy-Driven
Heat Transfer Enhancement in a Two-Dimensional Enclosure
Utilizing Nanofluids, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, vol. 46, pp. 36393653, 2003.
[81] Xuan, Y., and Li, Q., Investigation on Convective Heat Transfer
and Flow Features of Nanofluids, Transactions of ASME, Journal
of Heat Transfer, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 151155, 2003.
[82] Wen, D., and Ding, Y., Experimental Investigation into Convective Heat Transfer of Nanofluids at the Entrance Region under
Laminar Flow Conditions, International Journal of Heat and
Mass Transfer, vol. 47, pp. 51815188, 2004.
[83] Shah, R. K., Thermal Entry Length Solutions for the Circular
Tube and Parallel Plates, Proc. 3rd National Heat and Mass
Transfer Conf., vol. 1, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,
pp. HMT-11-75, Dec. 2729, 1975.
[84] Ding, Y., and Wen, D., Particle Migration in a Flow of Nanoparticle Suspensions, Powder Technology, vol. 149, pp. 8492, 2005.
[85] Ding, Y., Alias, H., Wen, D., and Williams, A. R., Heat Transfer of
Aqueous Suspensions of Carbon Nanotubes (CNT Nanofluids),
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 49, pp.
240250, 2006.
[86] Yang, Y. Z., Zhang, G., Grulke, E. A., Anderson, W. B., and
Wu, G., Heat Transfer Properties of Nanoparticle-in-Fluid Dispersions (Nanofluids) in Laminar Flow, International Journal of
Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 48, pp. 11071116, 2005.
[87] Goldstein, R. J., Joseph, D. D., and Pui, D. H., Convective Heat
Transport in Nanofluids, Available at: http://www.aem.umn.
edu/people/faculty/joseph/archive.html, Accessed Nov. 15,
2005.
[88] Kim, J., Kang, Y. T., and Choi, C. K., Analysis of Convective Instability and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Nanofluids, Physics
of Fluids, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 23952401, 2004.
S. K. DAS ET AL.
[89] Daungthongsuk, W., and Wongwises, S., A Critical Review of
Convective Heat Transfer of Nanofluids, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, in press.
[90] Maiga, S. E., Nguyen, C. T., Galanis, N., and Roy, G.,
Heat Transfer Behaviors of Nanofluids in a Uniformly Heated
Tube, Superlattices and Microstructures, vol. 35, pp. 543557,
2004.
[91] Boungirno, J., Convective Heat Transfer Enhancement in
Nanofluids, Proc. 18th National and 7th ISHMT-ASME Heat and
Mass Transfer Conf., IIT Guwahati, India, pp. 24172423, Jan. 3,
2006.
[92] Das, S. K., Putra, N., and Roetzel, W., Pool Boiling of NanoFluids on Horizontal Narrow Tubes, International Journal of
Multiphase Flow, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 12371247, 2003.
[93] Tsai, C. Y., Chien, H. T., Ding, P. P., Chang, B., Luh, T. Y., and
Chen, P. H., Effect of Structural Character of Gold Nanoparticles in Nanofluid on Heat Pipe Thermal Performance, Materials
Letters, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 14611465, 2004.
[94] You, S. M., Kim, J. H., and Kim, K. M., Effect of Nanoparticles
on Critical Heat Flux of Water in Pool Boiling of Heat Transfer, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 16, pp. 33743376,
2003.
[95] Vassallo, P., Kumar, R., and DAmico, S., Pool Boiling Heat
Transfer Experiments in Silica-Water Nano-Fluids, International
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 407411,
2004.
[96] Bang, I. C., and Chang, S. H., Boiling Heat Transfer Performance
and Phenomena of Al2 O3 Water Nano-Fluids from a Plain Surface in a Pool, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,
vol. 48, pp. 24072419, 2005.
[97] Bang, I. C., and Chang, S. H., Direct Observation of a Liquid Film
under a Vapor Environment in a Pool Boiling Using a Nanofluid,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, no. 13, pp. 13410713,
2005.
[98] Tzeng, S. C., Lin, C. W., and Huang, K. D., Heat Transfer Enhancement of Nanofluids in Rotary Blade Coupling of FourWheel-Drive Vehicles, Acta Mechanica, vol. 179, pp. 1123,
2005.
[99] Gosselin, L., and Da Silva, A. K., Combined Heat Transfer and
Power Dissipation Optimization of Nanofluid Flows, Applied
Physics Letters, vol. 85, no. 18, pp. 41604162, 2004.
[100] Chein, R., and Huang, G., Analysis of Microchannel Heat Sink
Performance Using Nanofluids, Applied Thermal Engineering,
vol. 25, pp. 31043114, 2005.
[101] Koo, J., and Kleinstreuer, C., Laminar Nanofluid Flow in Micro
Heat-Sinks, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,
vol. 48, pp. 26522661, 2005.
19
[102] Eastman, J. A., Phillpot, S. R., Choi, S. U. S., and Keblinski, P.,
Thermal Transport in Nanofluids, Annual Reviews in Material
Research, vol. 34, pp. 219246, 2004.
Sarit Kumar Das is a professor of the mechanical engineering department at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India. He received his M.E. and Ph.D.
degrees from Jadavpur University and Sambalpur
University, India, in 1986 and 1994, respectively. He
carried out post-doctoral research at the University of
Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg. He has published
about 100 research papers in international journals
and conferences and two textbooks. He had been a
visiting professor at the Helmut Schmidt University,
Hamburg and University of Lund, Sweden. He is a member of the editorial
board of International Journal of the Heat Exchangers and Journal of Heat
Transfer Engineering. His research interests include heat exchangers, two-phase
heat transfer, heat transfer in nano-fluids, transport in fuel cells, jet instabilities,
porous media, and computational fluid dynamics. He is the recipient of DAAD
and Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship of Germany. He is also the recipient
of the K. N. Seetharamu 2006 award for research from the Indian Society for
Heat and Mass Transfer.
Stephen U.S. Choi joined Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) in 1983 and has conducted research in
advanced fluids. He proposed the concept of nanofluids in 1993 and has led the nanofluids team to develop
stable nanofluids that showed high thermal conductivities. He currently serves as the principal investigator
of the nanofluids team. His pioneering work created
a new, active area of interdisciplinary research in the
field of nanoscale thermal sciences. The nanofluid
work was recognized as one of the top research accomplishments in the Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences Office in
2002. Prior to ANL, he was a staff scientist at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. He
received his B.S. from the Seoul National University in Korea, his M.S. from the
University of Texas at Austin, and his Ph.D. from the University of California,
Berkeley, all in mechanical engineering. Recently, he received the University
of Chicago Distinguished Performance Award for pioneering scientific achievements and outstanding leadership in nanofluid research. He is author or co-author
of more than 100 technical publications and holds three U.S. patents.
Hrishikesh E. Patel is a Ph.D. student in the Heat
Transfer and Thermal Power Laboratory, Department
of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India. He received his Masters degree from the same institute in 2003 and Bachelors degree from Government Engineering College,
Aurangabad, India in 2000. Currently, he is working
on the experimental and theoretical analysis of the
thermal behavior of nanofluids.