Geothermal Case Study Competition
Geothermal Case Study Competition
Geothermal Case Study Competition
Do the best and solve the case below based on your opinion, good luck! 😊
QUESTIONS
1. Geoscience Review (including Geology, Geochemistry, and Geophysics)
3. Drilling Design
a. Location at surface
b. Location at subsurface
c. Wellbore configuration
d. Drilling time
e. Well cost
e. PLTP Outline
1
NOTE :
• It is allowed to use assumption from the data that is not available using
secondary data from any trusted and published sources. It is not allowed to
use “Tugas Akhir” or something like that as your sources.
• Please include any sources used not only in Bibliography, but also in tables,
images, of graphics used.
• Report your work based on this latest Project Outline as follows :
1. Introduction
2. Geoscience Review
a. Geological Review
b. Geochemistry Review
c. Geophysics Review
3. Conceptual Model and Potential Estimation
4. Drilling Design
5. Field Development Plan
6. Conclusion
7. Bibliography
• Important Dates :
1. Project Report Submission Deadline : 20th January 2019
2. Presentation Submission Deadline : 31st January 2019
3. Presentation Day : 1st February 2019
2
GIVEN DATA :
1. MAP
3
Regional Geological Map
4
Peta Geologi Daerah Panas Bumi Kepahiang
5
Bouguer Anomaly Map
6
Total Magnetic Map
7
Apparent Resistivity Map
8
Apparent Resistivity Section (top) and Rock Resistivity of “D” Cross Section
9
North-South Resistivity Cross Section
MT Cross Section
10
GEOTHERMAL MANIFESTATION
Geothermal manifestations in the Kapahiang area consist of fumaroles, hot
springs, alterated rocks, and solfatara, which can generally be grouped into
eight groups. The naming and grouping of geothermal manifestations is
based on the place or location of the existence of these manifestations.
a. Sempiang Group
d. Suban Group
11
The manifestation of the Suban group is in Suban village at UTM
zone 48 S (229,923 mT; 9,617,056 mS) with an elevation of 850 m
asl. The manifestation of this group is in the form of 2 hot springs
with a temperature of 49,0-51,8 °C at an air temperature of 26,6 °C,
pH 5,9, and discharge of 5 liters / second. Around the hot spring
carbonate sinters are found. These hot springs have now been used
as tourism objects.
e. Kaba Group
g. Taba Penanjung
h. Bayung Group
12
The concentrations of 18O and 2H Isotopes (D) were five samples of hot
water (Ap. Sempiang, Ap. Babakan Bogor-1, Ap. Suban, and Ap. Bayung)
and one cold water sample (Ad. Babakan Bogor). The value of δ18O ranges
from -8,78 to -7,73 ‰ and the value of δD ranges from -57,2 to –53,5 ‰.
The ratio value is plotted in the graph δD vs 18O, with the meteoric water
line δD = 8δ18O +14.
Isotopes Graph
%
COMPONENT
MOL
CO2 4,1267
SO2 0,1302
H2S 0,1771
H2 0,0300
Ar 0,0021
N2 0,1024
NH3 0,1922
H2O 94,2149
5. SUPPORTING DATA
13
a. Soil Air Temperature Distribution
b. Soil pH Distribution
14
Land Hg Distribution Map
Soil CO2 concentrations varied from the lowest 0,42% to the highest
concentration of 8,14%. CO2 variation in soil air, showing
background value of 2,14%, threshold value of 2,75%, and average
value of 1,52%. High anomalies >2,0% occur around the fumaroles
/ solfatara of the G. Kaba Crater, Fumarol Sempiang, in the southern
part of the Babakan Bogor alteration site and some parts are
irregularly distributed, CO2 concentrations are between 1,5-2,0%,
distributed in a small part of the investigation area, while the value
of <1,5% is spread more evenly.
15