NASC Safety Report 2012
NASC Safety Report 2012
NASC Safety Report 2012
Safety Report 12
Maintaining High Standards in Scaffolding
NASC:
scaffolding
regulators
02 03
Cover photograph:
Scaffolding in progress,
St. Michaels Mount,
Marazion, Penzance.
Scaffolding as an industry is
changing, it is now becoming widely
accepted that the industry should be
regulated to ensure that only the most
up to date standards of best practice
and safety are used. As more and
more clients and contractors stipulate
only NASC (National Access &
Scaffolding Confederation) members
as the obvious solution to employing
a competent scaffolding contractor
the harder it is for rogue and inferior
scaffolding rms to nd corners of the
industry to continue operating in.
The 2012 Safety Report is,
once again proof that the NASCs
strict criteria for membership and
its insistence that every member
company operates to current industry
best practice provides a safer
method of working for scaffolding
that reduces accidents and
ultimately saves lives.
By selecting a rigorously audited
NASC member you are making the
right decision because you are making
an informed decision. There is no
speculation as to the standard and
What is
the NASC
objective?
The NASC - National Access & Scaffolding Confederation has
been the established national trade association for the scaffolding
industry in the UK for more than 60 years.
Our objective is to ensure the scaffolding and access industry
maintains the highest practicable standards of workmanship via
cohesive development and detailed regulation.
NASC members account for over 75% of the UKs total spend
on scaffolding and competitively work in every county in the UK.
04 05
NATIONAL ACCESS AND SCAFFOLDING CONFEDERATION
06 07
UK Contractors Group
Construction Industry
Scaffolders Record Scheme
Construction Skills
Certication Scheme
08 09
Strategic Forum
Union Europaischer
Gerustbaubetriebe
CG12:
Contract Clauses
CG13:
CG14:
Pre-Contract Meetings
SG10:
CG15:
SG11:
Noise
Subcontract
SG13:
CG16:
Employment Contracts
SG14:
Safety Nets
CG17:
SG15:
Contractor
SG16:
Management of Fall
CG18:
Day Work
CG19:
Protection Equipment
SG17:
SG18:
SG19:
SG20:
SG2:
SG21:
SG1:
CG1:
Pavement Licences
SG22:
Induction Training
CG2:
Set-off
SG3:
SG24:
CG3:
Programmes
SG4:
CG5:
CG6:
Scaffold Design
CG7:
CG8:
CG9:
SG4:
(Method Statements)
(Management Guide)
SG25:
SG26:
SG27:
SG5:
Preparation of Quotations
SG6:
SG7:
CG10:
SG8:
CG11:
SG9:
SG28:
SG29:
SG30:
PAVE1:
SG31:
AID1:
SG32:
Scaffold Platforms
TG5:
TG6:
Scaffold Boards
Board Brackets
TG7:
SG35:
TG8:
Fire Damage
Scaffold Structures
TG9:
SG36:
Hire/Sale/Manufacturing Guidance
N/A
TG11:
Security Guidance
TG13:
TG14:
Check Couplers
TG16:
Technical Guidance
TG17:
TG1:
TG20:
TG3:
TG20:
of BS EN12811-1
Jason Anker talks about his life after a fall from height
on Scaffolding
Training Guidance
Anchorage Systems
*Correct at time of going to press. For the latest guidance please visit: www.nasc.org.uk
10 11
SG34:
Does our
work make a
difference?
Over the last three decades the
number of NASC scaffolders in the
UK has risen from approximately
8000 in 1980 to 13716 by the
end of 2011.
Despite the rise in numbers of
scaffolders the incidence rate for
accidents has steadily declined.
The number of reported accidents
in 1980 was 532, by 2011 that gure
had reduced to 145.
12 13
NATIONAL ACCESS AND SCAFFOLDING CONFEDERATION
Comparison
of NASC/HSE
accident statistics
Comparison of NASC Accident and Construction Industry Statistics supplied by the HSE
2002/03
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
2003/04
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
2004/05
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
2005/06
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
10721
55
11810
133
10499
11238
41
155
39
158
33
180
70
4721
9578
71
4728
8995
69
4496
8288
60
4472
8384
79
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a indicates The HSE are unable to provide these gures from the RIDDOR reports. * indicates 2011/2012 gures are not yet available.
2006/07
Major
Injury
2007/08
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
2008/09
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
2009/10
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
2010/11
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
2011/12
Over
3 Day
Fatal
Injury
Major
Injury
Over
3 Day
14 15
11944
14029
13670
13124
14686
13716
133
49
125
66
105
41
98
28
93
34
111
4457
7915
72
4415
8188
53
3913
7351
42
2585
5651
50
2298
4784
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
202
280
150
244
116
197
Note: The general construction statistics and the scaffolding fatalities include all those reported by NASC members.
The NASC reporting period runs from January - December. The HSE reporting period runs from April - March.
36
Number of
Companies
Number of
Operatives
1975
33
5879
1976
36
6286
1977
36
6772
1978
40
7244
1979
44
8510
1980
46
1981
50
1982
Incidents
Incidence
Rate
Frequency
Rate
Fatalities
Fatal
Incidence Rate
494
84.03
4.20
0.17
568
90.36
4.52
0.00
700
103.37
5.17
0.29
596
82.27
4.11
0.27
655
76.97
3.85
0.35
8160
532
65.20
3.26
0.36
7513
496
66.02
3.30
0.53
41
6833
546
79.91
4.00
0.00
0.44
1983
46
6809
480
70.49
3.52
1984
44
5930
421
70.99
3.55
0.16
1985
45
5420
423
78.04
3.90
0.55
1986
45
6840
523
76.46
3.82
0.43
1987
47
6842
497
72.64
3.63
0.29
1988
47
8094
576
71.16
3.56
0.12
1989
40
7640
550
71.99
3.60
0.00
1990
29
8435
447
52.99
2.65
0.23
1991
53
7090
530
74.75
3.74
0.14
1992
54
6603
283
42.86
2.14
0.15
1993
62
6321
283
44.77
2.24
0.15
1994
70
7520
264
35.11
1.76
0.13
1995
71
7524
267
35.49
1.77
0.13
1996
68
6816
248
36.38
1.82
0.14
1997
87
8943
330
36.90
1.85
0.22
1998
81
7871
232
29.48
1.47
0.00
1999
105
10679
258
24.16
1.21
0.00
2000
110
10779
253
23.47
1.17
0.09
2001
119
11950
243
20.3
1.017
0.17
2002
122
10721
189
17.63
0.88
0.09
2003
125
11810
197
16.68
0.83
0.084
2004
138
10499
198
18.86
0.94
0.095
2005
145
11238
213
18.95
0.95
0.00
2006
148
11994
169
14.09
0.70
0.00
2007
152
14029
174
12.40
0.62
0.00
2008
174
13760
170
12.35
0.62
0.00
2009
201
13124
139
10.59
0.53
0.00
2010
201
14686
121
8.24
0.41
0.00
2011
201
13716
145
10.57
0.53
0.00
Method of Calculation...
Incidence rate =
Frequency rate =
Fatalities to Operatives
Injuries to Operatives
16 17
As part of the NASC membership criteria, every member has to complete the
NASC accident return forms by a given date. This annual report is based on
factual information reported by all full contracting members of the National
Access and Scaffolding Confederation in 2011. It is estimated that this
represents approximately 75% of the total scaffolding operatives in the industry.
160
140
Handling of Materials
Falls
Falls materials
Number of Accidents
120
107
102
100
80
60
40
20
121
99
94
91
77
72
84
80
76
53
51
74
56
49
47
75
53
54
22
20
25
60
52
52
39
41
37
24
12
11
2002
2003
48
16
20
19
16
0
1992
1993
1994
1995
45
40
28
38
37
29
19
1996
1997
1998
70
60
36
31
91
80
72
59
49
84
85
83
60
84
94
1999
2000
2001
15
46
56
2005
26
28
18
16
13
17
2007
2008
2006
36
32
26
25
21
15
2004
52
2009
23
10
2010
2011
Year
Yard operations for the year 2011: 17% of all NASC reportable
accidents occurred in the yard.
Number of Accidents
35
30
28
Handling of Materials
25
22
20
18
17
1993
1994
0
1992
1995
1996
1997
14
9
2
1998
17
15
17
14
8
2
Falls
20
18
15
15
10
26
12
4
3
4
0
2000
11
11
8
11
1999
15
14
2001
2002
6
2
2003
2004
2005
6
3
2006
11
9
2007
2008
3
2009
Year
Major 3 Day
Operatives Injuries
Total
Fatal
FALLS
Scaffolding structures
Working platform, gangway, trestles
Cradles, boatswains chairs etc.
Ladders
Hoists during erection or dismantling
Collapse of scaffold
Failure/collapse of cradle, boatswains chair
Breakage i.e. displacement, boards
Falls in yard
Other (from walls, roofs, rope, lorry)
SUB TOTAL
11
13
19
27
FALLS OF MATERIALS
From scaffold
From platforms
From cradles, boatswains chairs etc
From hoists during dismantling
Due to collapse of scaffold
Other falls of materials
SUB TOTAL
12
31
36
4
1
HANDLING OF MATERIALS
On site
In yard
SUB TOTAL
32
37
11
32
43
10
14
18
49
67
36
109
145
SUB TOTAL
3
2
1
2010
1
2011
The analysis shown in Tables 2, 3 and 4 indicate that falls from height
accidents have increased by 68% from 16 in 2010 to 27 in 2011.
The analysis for 2011 has identied
that the highest fall from a scaffold
structure reported during the year
was 7.5m.
The incident occurred in January
2011, where a Part 2 CISRS scaffolder
was erecting the 5th lift around an
apartment block in Wembley.
The scaffolding was a progressively
raised single boarded basic scaffold
in accordance with TG20:08 and was
erected in 1.5m bricklayers lifts. The
IP was working in a 2 man gang with
his son who was a trainee card holder
and Construction Skills apprentice.
The lift had been erected from below
installing a single guardrail followed by
transoms and boards. The boarding out
was completed by the trainee whilst
the IP was following behind installing
the intermediate guardrail, toeboards,
brickguards and inside board clips.
The IP then stepped on the section
where the boards butt, which
subsequently tipped up as the transom
installer had not installed the butt joint
transom at the correct spacing. The
IP fell through the structure to ground
level, impacting with the structure on
the way down. No boards fell to ground
Causes of
accidents to
operatives
18 19
16-20
Age
Grade
Fall Materials
Yard
Other
Scaf.
MHO
WE
Elec
Fire
HS
STF
Other
Other
MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d MI 3d
Manager
Supervisor
Advanced
Scaffolder
Trainee
Labourer
Driver
Manager
21-30
Supervisor
Advanced
Scaffolder
Trainee
Driver
Labourer
27
16
2
2
Manager
31-40
Supervisor
Advanced
Scaffolder
1
1
Trainee
Labourer
17
Driver
Manager
41-50
Supervisor
Advanced
Scaffolder
3
1
13
Trainee
Labourer
Driver
Manager
51-60
Supervisor
Advanced
Scaffolder
Trainee
Labourer
Driver
1
1
Manager
Supervisor
Advanced
61+
Totals
Falls
SC/WP Cradle Ladder
Scaffolder
Trainee
Labourer
Driver
TOTALS
0
3
3
27
11
2
12
= Major Injury
= Over 3 Day Injury
= Scaffolding/working platform
= Manual Handling Operation
= Work Equipment
= Electrical Injury
= Harmful Substance
= Slips, Trips & Falls on the same level
32
37
8
14
1
1
0
0
0 10 33
0
= 27
= 7.5m
=8
= 6 (SC/WP)
= 2 (SC/WP)
=5
= 2 (Both operatives were able to self rescue)
43
10
11
145
Analysis of Accidents
The NASC also looks at the relationship between the individual reported
accidents and the grade and age of the scaffolder or operative and
compares the overall statistics with those reported in 2011.
we identied that Basic Scaffolders
suffered the largest number of
accidents across all age ranges,
totalling 69 (48%).
This was followed by Trainees
27 (19%), Labourers 22 (15%),
Advanced Scaffolders 14 (10%),
Drivers 8 (5%), Supervisors 3 (2%)
and Managers 2 (1%).
These statistics show that when
compared with the 2011 statistics,
Labourers have now gone ahead of
Advanced Scaffolders.
20 21
52
50
33
30
20
20
19
20
16
15
15
14
14
11
11
9
10
4
3
2
0
0
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Frequency
Rate of FAs
Dangerous
Occurances
Number of
accidents:
To 3rd Parties
Total number of
days absent
RIDDOR
Diseases
896
25
921
6.51
0.33
0.00
2441
128
2558
39
15.25
0.76
0.00
2196
139
2325
34
14.62
0.73
0.00
1417
38
1445
20
13.84
0.69
0.00
2450
81
2522
26
10.31
0.52
0.00
3794
151
3945
20
5.07
0.25
0.00
13194
562
13716
145
10.57
0.53
0.00
Arrested by
Safety
Harnesses
Accidents to
Members of
Public
Fatal
Accidents
Frequency
Rate
Incidence
Rate
12
Number of
Accidents to
Workers
32
All Company
Total
1001 +
201 to 1000
101 to 200
82
All Company
Sub Contractors
Total
66
All Company
Employees
1 - 20
(Very Small)
21 - 50
(Small)
51 - 100
(Small - Medium)
101 - 200
(Medium)
201 - 1000
(Medium - Large)
1001 +
(Large)
51 to 100
21 to 50
Number of
Companies Employing
1 to 20
Number of Injuries
40
2010
2011
22 23
Fracture
Amputation
Dislocation
Temporary Loss of Sight
Chemical Burn
Electrical Burn
Burn
Penetration
Unconscious
Strain
Sprain
Abrasion
Laceration
Cut
Bruising
Multiple
Other
Total
%
Face
Head
Neck/
Shoulder
Ribs/
Chest/
Stomach
Back
Arm
Hand /
Finger
& Wrist
Leg /
Hip /
Groin
17
Feet / Multiple
Toes
& Ankles
Total
45
0
4
1
0
0
0
4
1
14
32
1
3
8
13
4
15
145
31
0
3
0.5
0
0
0
3
0.5
10
22
0.5
2
5.5
9
3
10
Feet /
Toes
& Ankles
Multiple
Total
13
1
2
2
3
1
1
9
8
1
2
1.5
1
1
0.5
2
2
1
6
4
2
13
9
1
7
5
20
14
Head
Neck/
Shoulder
Ribs/
Chest/
Stomach
1
10
7
3
4
1
1
1
2
6
32
22
1
15
10
14
1
1
1
1
34
23.5
1
3
5
3.5
Fracture
Amputation
Dislocation
Temporary Loss of Sight
Chemical Burn
Electrical Burn
Burn
Penetration
Unconscious
Strain
Sprain
Abrasion
Laceration
Cut
Bruising
Multiple
Other
Total
Face
Back
Arm
Hand /
Finger
& Wrist
Leg /
Hip /
Groin
10
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
5
0
1
0
4
2
0
27
Head
Neck/
Shoulder
Ribs/
Chest/
Stomach
Back
Arm
Hand /
Finger
& Wrist
Leg /
Hip /
Groin
Feet /
Toes
& Ankles
Multiple
Total
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
4
0
1
12
2
1
1
2
1
2
Fracture
Amputation
Dislocation
Temporary Loss of Sight
Chemical Burn
Electrical Burn
Burn
Penetration
Unconscious
Strain
Sprain
Abrasion
Laceration
Cut
Bruising
Multiple
Other
Total
Face
1
1
1
3
Analysis of Injuries
to Operatives
24 25
Type of
Accident
Most Common
Type of Injury
Most Common
Overall Injury
Fracture
Fracture F, T & A
Falling Materials
Neck/Shoulder
Fracture/Bruising
Fracture Neck/Shoulder/Bruising
Manual Handling
Fracture
Sprain
Other Accidents
Fracture
Fracture
Amputation
Dislocation
Temporary Loss of Sight
Chemical Burn
Electrical Burn
Burn
Penetration
Unconscious
Strain
Sprain
Abrasion
Laceration
Cut
Bruising
Multiple
Other
Total
Face
Head
Neck/
Shoulder
Ribs/
Chest/
Stomach
Back
Arm
Hand /
Finger
& Wrist
Leg /
Hip /
Groin
Feet /
Toes
& Ankles
Multiple
1
1
1
5
3
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
5
16
Arm
Hand /
Finger
& Wrist
Leg /
Hip /
Groin
Feet /
Toes
& Ankles
Ribs/
Chest/
Stomach
Back
Total
12
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
7
5
0
0
3
1
0
7
37
Fracture
Amputation
Dislocation
Temporary Loss of Sight
Chemical Burn
Electrical Burn
Burn
Penetration
Unconscious
Strain
Sprain
Abrasion
Laceration
Cut
Bruising
Multiple
Other
Total
Face
Head
Neck/
Shoulder
Multiple
Total
11
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
17
1
2
0
4
0
2
43
Multiple
Total
1
1
4
1
1
11
1
2
1
1
5
1
17
Neck/
Shoulder
Ribs/
Chest/
Stomach
Back
Arm
Hand /
Finger
& Wrist
Leg /
Hip /
Groin
Feet /
Toes
& Ankles
Fracture
Amputation
Dislocation
Temporary Loss of Sight
Chemical Burn
Electrical Burn
Burn
Penetration
Unconscious
Strain
Sprain
Abrasion
Laceration
Cut
Bruising
Multiple
Other
Total
Face
Head
2
1
1
1
1
4
1
4
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
6
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
3
0
0
4
0
2
5
26
26 27
Does the
industry
support
the NASC?
Scaffolding rms are nding it harder
and harder to gain work on sites
without these credentials.
How does
a company
become a
member of
the NASC
into 3 areas:
Membership is categorised
28 29
The NASC would like to thank the following 201 members for their
assistance in producing this Safety Report:
Our special
thanks to...
3 D Scaffolding Ltd
360 Scaffolding Ltd
A & J Maintenance Support Ltd
A&A Scaffolding Plus Eight (2003) Ltd
AAA Scaffold Ltd
Abbey Scaffolding (Swindon) Ltd
Access Solutions Scaffolding Ltd
Ace Scaffolding (M/CR) Ltd
Acorn Scaffolding (Yorkshire) Ltd
Advanced Scaffolding (Bristol) Ltd
Aerial Scaffolding Ltd
Alan Wilks Scaffolding Ltd
Allen & Foxworthy Ltd
Allied Scaffolding Ltd
Alltask Ltd
ALP Scaffolding Services Ltd
Amber Scaffolding Ltd
Anglesey Scaffolding (Ynys Mon) Company Ltd
Anglewest Ltd
AOM Scaffolding Ltd
Apex Scaffolding (Exeter) Ltd
Apex Scaffolding (Leicester) Ltd
Archway Services plc
Arctic Scaffolding Co Ltd
ASC Edinburgh Ltd
Artel Scaffolding
Ash Scaffolding Ltd
Ashdurn Scaffolding Ltd
Ashford Scaffolding Ltd
Ashton Scaffolding Services Ltd
Atlantic Services North West Ltd
Austins Cradles Ltd
B & A Scaffolding Ltd
B J Champion Scaffolding Ltd
Bee Jay Scaffolding Ltd
Blencowe Scaffolding Ltd
Brogan Group
Brunel Scaffolding Ltd
Bryson Scaffolding Ltd
BSL Systems Ltd
C & D Industrial Services (Scotland) Ltd
Cape Industrial Services Ltd
Carlisle Scaffolding Ltd
Castle Scaffolding Ltd
Cheshire Scaffolds Ltd
Chris Sedgeman Scaffolding Ltd
City Scaffold Services (Midlands) Ltd
Combined Scaffolding Ltd
Commercial Scaffolding Ltd
Complete Access Specialist Contracts Ltd
Connect Scaffolding Ltd
Connolly Scaffolding Ltd
Construction Site Scaffolding Ltd
Contract Scaffolding Services Ltd
Controlled Scaffolding Ltd
Coventry Scaffolding Co (London) Ltd
Crossway Scaffolding (Elland) Ltd
CWR Scaffolds Ltd
D + R Group Plc
Deborah Services Limited
Denholm Industrial Services Ltd
Design Scaffolding (Bristol) Ltd
Deverson Direct Ltd
Dixon Scaffolding (Transmission) Ltd
E A Scaffolding & Systems Ltd
How do I nd an NASC
member company?
www.nasc.org.uk
02 03
We want you to feel condent and safe using the NASC (National Access and Scaffolding
Confederation). Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information
supplied herein, the NASC cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions.
The NASC reserves the right to alter or change the content of this document without
prior notice of consent. Published 05/12. E&OA