Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Ijri Cce 01 005

    Uploaded by

    ijripublishers
    This document summarizes a study analyzing and designing a 31-story residential tower in India using dynamic analysis and the response spectrum method. Key points: 1) A 31-story residential tower in Gurgaon, India was modeled and analyzed using ETABS software. Dynamic analysis using the response spectrum method was performed to design for seismic loads. 2) 20 vibration modes were considered, with the first two accounting for over 90% of the modal mass. Scale factors up to 1.6 were applied to design responses. 3) Deflections were within permissible limits of H/250. Inter-story drift was below 0.004 times the story height. The design met Indian seismic code requirements. 4

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ijri Cce 01 005

    Uploaded by

    ijripublishers
    30 views4 pages
    This document summarizes a study analyzing and designing a 31-story residential tower in India using dynamic analysis and the response spectrum method. Key points: 1) A 31-story residential tower in Gurgaon, India was modeled and analyzed using ETABS software. Dynamic analysis using the response spectrum method was performed to design for seismic loads. 2) 20 vibration modes were considered, with the first two accounting for over 90% of the modal mass. Scale factors up to 1.6 were applied to design responses. 3) Deflections were within permissible limits of H/250. Inter-story drift was below 0.004 times the story height. The design met Indian seismic code requirements. 4

    Original Description:

    IJRI-CCE-01-005

    Original Title

    IJRI-CCE-01-005

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a study analyzing and designing a 31-story residential tower in India using dynamic analysis and the response spectrum method. Key points: 1) A 31-story residential tower in Gurgaon, India was modeled and analyzed using ETABS software. Dynamic analysis using the response spectrum method was performed to design for seismic loads. 2) 20 vibration modes were considered, with the first two accounting for over 90% of the modal mass. Scale factors up to 1.6 were applied to design responses. 3) Deflections were within permissible limits of H/250. Inter-story drift was below 0.004 times the story height. The design met Indian seismic code requirements. 4

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    30 views4 pages

    Ijri Cce 01 005

    Uploaded by

    ijripublishers
    This document summarizes a study analyzing and designing a 31-story residential tower in India using dynamic analysis and the response spectrum method. Key points: 1) A 31-story residential tower in Gurgaon, India was modeled and analyzed using ETABS software. Dynamic analysis using the response spectrum method was performed to design for seismic loads. 2) 20 vibration modes were considered, with the first two accounting for over 90% of the modal mass. Scale factors up to 1.6 were applied to design responses. 3) Deflections were within permissible limits of H/250. Inter-story drift was below 0.004 times the story height. The design met Indian seismic code requirements. 4

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    International Journal of Research and Innovation (IJRI)

    International Journal of Research and Innovation (IJRI)


    1401-1402

    ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RESIDENTIAL TOWER BY DYNAMIC


    ANALYSIS USING RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD

    D.Ramarao1, K. Mythili2, G.Venkat Ratnam3


    1 Research Scholar, Department Of Civil Engineering, Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research Academy, Hyderabad, India
    2 Associate professor , Department Of Civil Engineering, Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research Academy, Hyderabad, India
    3 Associate professor , Department Of Civil Engineering, Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research Academy, Hyderabad, India

    Abstract
    This Project Named As Analysis And Design Of Residential Tower (2basemetns+Stilt+31 Upper Floors)By Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Method Involves The Analysis And Design Of Residential Tower 3-D Frames Of Uniform
    Floor heights for typical floors using very popular software tool ETABS 9.7.2.
    The main thesis of this Project is to achieve the following:
    1).To arrive at minimum number of modes required to get modal mass participating ratio more than 90% by dynamic
    analysis using Response Spectrum Method.
    2). To limit the lateral deflection at the top of the tower less than H/250(Where H = Height of the tower till terrace) for
    seismic load.
    3). To limit the Inter Storey Deflection(Storey Drift) in any storey due to the minimum specified design lateral force,
    with factor of 1.0 less than 0.004 times the storey height.
    In addition to that the detailed study of seismology was undertaken and the feasibility of the software tool to be used
    was also checked. Till date many such projects have been undertaken on this very topic but the seismic analysis were
    generally done by static analysis but to this the seismic analysis is done by dynamic analysis for all possible load
    combinations pertaining to IS 456, IS 1893 and IS 13920.

    *Corresponding Author:
    D.RAMARAO, Research Scholar, Department of CIVIL Engineer-

    Design methodology:

    ing, Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research Academy,


    Hyderabad, India

    S. No

    Points

    Description

    Published: October 27, 2014


    Review Type: peer reviewed
    Volume: I, Issue : II

    Structural
    system

    Conventional beam slab arrangement

    Method of
    analysis

    Space frame method has been used for


    analysis of this structure, Software- E
    TABS

    Foundation
    design

    Conventional raft- SAFE software shall


    be used for the designing of raft.

    Citation:D.RAMARAO1,(2014)Analysis And Design Of


    Residential Tower By Dynamic Analysis Using Response
    Spectrum Method

    Brief Description of the Structure


    Proposed Structure consists of Residential Tower to
    be constructed at Gurgaon.

    Salient Features of building are as follows.

    Loads to be considered while designing:


    1

    Dead loads

    Sizes of structural
    members x density
    of concrete

    25 kN/cum

    Name

    New Town Heights at Gurgaon

    Floor finish load

    1.2 kN/sqm

    Location

    Gurgaon

    3.0 kN/sqm

    Type

    Residential Building

    No.of floors

    2B+ST+31 Floors

    Water proofing Terrace load on terrace,


    Inclusive of brick
    batcoba

    IS-875-I

    40

    International Journal of Research and Innovation (IJRI)

    Live load

    Masonry
    loads

    i)Living rooms, bed


    room kitchen &
    toilets etc.
    ii)Corridors, passages & stairs
    iii)Balconies

    2 KN/sqm.
    3 KN/sqm
    3 KN/sqm

    External Wall
    loads(Concrete
    Blocks)
    Internal(Fly ash
    bricks)/ density

    20 KN/sqm
    10 KN/sqm

    IS-875-II

    Recommendation for construction materials:


    S.No

    Construction Material

    Specification

    Reinforcement steel

    Fe 500 D (TMT)
    (Ductile steel to
    be used)

    Grade of concrete for


    a)
    Columns
    M40,M35,M30,M25
    b)
    Foundations/rafts - M25
    c)
    Retaining wall and tie
    beams M25
    d)
    Conventional beams
    M20,M40
    e)
    Conventional slabs M20

    Ready Mix Concrete

    Type of Masonry:

    Concrete Block
    work for external
    walls and Fly ash
    brickwork for
    internal walls

    Cement:
    OPC cement is preferable to use
    for important RCC work. In case of
    non-availability of OPC cement, PPC
    cement can be used.

    Other Predominant Forces:


    S. No

    load

    4)

    Earth quake load.


    a).Zone for Gurgaon
    b).Importance factor
    c). Type of structure d).Response Reduction Factor
    Soil type
    Time period to be used

    V
    1
    SMRF
    5
    2.0
    0.075h^0.75

    Wind loads.
    Basic wind pressure (Gurgaon)
    Category
    Class

    47m/s
    2
    C

    5)

    Preference:
    Use OPC cement
    Under constraint PPC cement
    Flyash not to be used

    Soft Storey Due to Stilt:


    To take care of soft storey due to stilt, besides the columns designed and detailed for the calculated storey
    shears and moments, shear walls shall be placed symmetrically in both directions of the building as far away
    from the centre of the building as feasible, to be designed
    exclusively for 1.5 times the lateral storey force.
    Dynamic analysis:
    Dynamic analysis is being performed by the Response
    Spectrum Method. The design base shear (VB) shall be
    compared with a base shear (VBT) calculated using a fundamental period Ta. Incase VB is less than VBT, all the
    response quantities are multiplied by scale factor.

    Detailing for ductility: As per the provisions of IS 13920.

    Covers for R.C.C Structures:


    Following values as recommended by IS.456-2000
    and as per norms of NBC for fire resistance 2
    hours.
    S.No
    1

    Environmental condition

    Mild

    Covering

    IS 456- clause-26.4

    a).Footings

    50mm

    b). Rafts

    50 mm

    c).Columns and Lift walls

    40mm

    d).Slabs

    20mm(valid for
    1.5hrs)

    e).Beams

    20mm (valid for 1.5


    hrs)and dia of the
    bar whichever is
    maximum

    Following load cases considered for design calculation:


    1.5(DL+LL),
    1.2(DL+LL+SPEC X),
    1.2(DL+LL+SPEC Y),
    1.2(DL+LL+WLXP),
    1.2(DL+LL+WLXN),
    1.2(DL+LL+WLYP),
    1.2(DL+LL+WLYN)
    1.5(DL+SPEC X),
    1.5(DL+SPEC Y),
    1.5(DL+WLXP),
    1.5(DL+WLXN),
    1.5(DL+WLYP),
    1.5(DL+WLYN).

    Specification

    Slabs and beams are additionally


    protected by plastering, flooring /water proofing Which helps
    to enhance fire resistance time
    further.
    3

    Retaining wall

    40mm for soil


    side(1.5 hours ok for
    basement)
    25mm for other side

    Water retaining walls


    To avoid corrosion in case of
    water proofing failure

    50mm (for severe


    condition)

    41

    International Journal of Research and Innovation (IJRI)

    (vi)Height to Width ratio of building: 5.071


    (vii)Length to Width ratio of building: 1.155
    B.Structural Analysis and Design:
    (i)Structural Analysis Software: ETABS 9.7.2 Version
    (ii)Structural System: SMRF
    (iii)Foundation System: Raft foundation for entire tower
    (iv)Loading parameters:
    (a)Dead load: Self weight of slab + wall load + floor finishes
    (b)Live load: For Living areas -2KN/M2
    For Balconies, Corridors, Staircases-3KN/M2
    (c) Seismic Load: As per IS 1893:2002
    (i) Zone Factor (Z): 0.36 for zone V
    (ii) Importance Factor (I): 1.0
    (iii) Soil type: 2.0
    (iv) Fundamental Time Period (Tx/y):

    A seismic design of high rise buildings has assumed


    considerable importance in recent times.
    In traditional methods adopted based on fundamental mode of the structure and distribution of earthquake forces as static forces at various stories may
    be adequate for structures of small height subjected
    to earthquake of very low intensity but as the number of stories increases the seismic design demands
    more rigorous. [1]*

    Height of building till Terrace (h) = 110.5



    Tx= (0.075 x h^0.75) = 2.556 sec
    Ty= (0.075 x h^0.75) = 2.556 sec
    (v)Response Reduction Factor (R):5 (for SMRF R is 5)
    (vi)Seismic Coefficient (Ah x/y):
    X=0.0192
    (Refer Page no. 1 of Appendix 1)
    Y=0.0192
    (Refer Page no. 2 of Appendix 1)
    (Vii) Seismic Weight: 325257.41kN. (Refer Page no. 1 of
    Appendix 1)
    (viii) Base shears Vibe x/y:
    Vbx=6230.28KN
    ( Refer Page no. 1 of Appendix 1)
    Vby=6230.28KN
    ( Refer Page no. 2 of Appendix 1)
    (ix) Damping: 5% ( Since it is a concrete structure)
    (V) Seismic Analysis Method: Response Spectrum Method
    .
    (a)No. of modes considered: 20 ( with 20 nos of modes,
    modal mass participating ratio is more than 90%,Refer
    Table 1)

    PHASES OF THE PROJECT


    The project was divided into two phases. They are
    as follows:Phase-1- Developing model using ETABS.
    Phase-2- Analysis of reinforced concrete frames for
    static loads (dead, live, wind and load combinations)
    and dynamic load (Earth quake load-Spectrum cases).
    Inferences from the of Etabs Model:
    A.Geometrical Configuration of the Tower:
    (i)No of storey: (2 Basements + Stilt +31 upper floors)
    (ii)Floor Height in m: (Basement 2 is resting on
    Foundation system, Basement 1=3.65,GF=4.4,First
    Floor=3.25,Typical floor 3.2,LMR and SHR=2.785 )
    (iii)No of lift: 3
    (iv)No of staircase :2
    (v)Total height of structure: 113.285m till LMR roof
    Height of building till terrace = 110.5m
    Width of building = 21.79m
    Length of building = 25.18m

    (b)Modal Mass participation:


    First mode: 73%
    (Refer Table 1)
    Second mode: 18.2% (Refer Table 1)
    (c)Scale Factor
    i. Along X- direction: 1.4837 (Refer Appendix 3)
    ii. Along Y- direction: 1.6158 (Refer Appendix 3)
    (Vi) Total Deflection of Building: with fundamental time
    period
    i.Along X direction:
    110.81 mm (Refer for Point 595 of Table 2) < 442mm
    permissible
    (Permissible deflection = Span/250(=442mm) as per
    clause 23.2 of IS: 456-2000)
    ii.Along Y direction:
    129.56mm (Refer for Point 53 of Table 2) < 442mm permissible
    (Permissible deflection = Span/250(=442mm) as per
    clause 23.2 of IS: 456-2000)
    (Vii) Inter story Deflection (Storey Drift):
    With Fundamental Time period: 0.001467 <0.004(Refer
    Appendix 2)

    Conclusion
    The tasks of providing full seismic safety for the
    residents inhabiting the most earthquake-

    42

    International Journal of Research and Innovation (IJRI)

    prone regions are far from being solved. However in


    present time we have new regulations in place for
    construction that greatly contribute to earthquake
    disaster mitigation and are being in applied in accordance with world practice. [8]* [4]*

    Author:

    In the regulations adopted for implementation in


    India the following factors have been found to be
    critically important in the design and construction
    of seismic resistant buildings:
    Sites selection for construction that are the most
    favorable in terms of the frequency of occurrence
    and the likely severity of ground shaking and ground
    failure;
    High quality of construction to be provided conforming to related IS codes such as IS1893, IS
    13920 to ensure good performance during future
    earthquakes.
    To implement the design of building elements and
    joints between them in accordance with analysis
    .i.e. ductility design should be done.
    structural-spatial solutions should be applied that
    provide symmetry and regularity in the distribution
    of mass and stiffness in plan and in elevation.
    Whereas such the situations demands irregularity
    maximum effort should be given to done away with
    the harmful effects like that of SHORT COLUMN
    EFFECT
    Researchers indicate that compliance with the
    above-mentioned requirements will contribute significantly to disaster mitigation, regardless of the
    intensity of the seismic loads and specific features
    of the earthquakes. These modifications in construction and design can be introduced which as a
    result has increase seismic reliability of the buildings and seismic safety for human life.

    D.Ramarao
    student at
    Aurora s scientific and technological and Research
    Academy,Hyderabad, India.

    K. Mythili M.Tech(structural engg)


    Asso.Professor at
    Aurora's scientific and technological and Research
    Academy,Hyderabad, India.

    G.Venkat Ratnam
    Asso.Professor
    Aurora's scientific and technological and Research
    Academy,Hyderabad, India.

    References:[1].Murthy C.V.R, Learning earthquake design


    [2]Agrawal, Shrikhande Mansih, earth quake resistant design of structures
    [3]IS: 456:2000, Plain and Reinforced code of practice.
    [4]IS: 1893(Part-1):2002, Criteria for earth quake
    resistant design of structure.
    [5]IS: 13920:1993, Ductile detailing of RCC structure subjected to earth quake force.
    [6]SP:16,Design Aid for Reinforced concrete to
    IS:456:2000.
    [7]Ramamurtham,Theory of structures
    [8] Ashimbayev M.U., Itskov I.E., Lobodryga
    T.D.,living with natural and technological hazards,
    topic a.2: reducing vulnerabilities in existing building and lifelines

    43

    You might also like