Antenna Basic R&S
Antenna Basic R&S
Antenna Basic R&S
White Paper
This white paper describes the basic functionality of antennas. Starting with Hertz's Antenna model
followed by a short introduction to the fundamentals of wave propagation, the important general
characteristics of an antenna and its associated parameters are explained.
Maik Reckeweg
4.2014 - 8GEP_WP01
White Paper
A more detailed explanation of the functionality of some selected antenna types concludes this white
paper.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 3
2 Fundamentals of Wave Propagation ................................................. 5
2.1
2.2
Wavelength ...................................................................................................................6
2.3
2.4
2.5
Polarization ...................................................................................................................8
Radiation Density.........................................................................................................9
3.2
3.3
Directivity....................................................................................................................13
3.4
Gain .............................................................................................................................13
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
4.2
Monopole Antenna.....................................................................................................22
4.3
4.4
4.5
5 Appendix ........................................................................................... 31
5.1
8GEP_WP01
References ..................................................................................................................31
Introduction
1 Introduction
Antennas act as converters between conducted waves and electromagnetic waves
propagating freely in space (see Figure 1). Their name is borrowed from zoology, in
which the Latin word antennae is used to describe the long, thin feelers possessed by
many insects.
Radiated wave
propagated in space
Antenna
Receiver or
Conductive wave
Transmitter
The oldest existing antennas, such as those used by Heinrich Hertz in 1888 during his
first experiments to prove the existence of electromagnetic waves, were in theory and
in practice not so very different from an RF generator.
An antenna can be derived from a parallel circuit which consists of an inductor and a
capacitor. If the plates of the capacitor are bent open, and the inductor is reduced to
the inductance of the wire itself, one ends up with a dipole antenna as shown at the
very right position of Figure 2.
In fact, resonant circuits are still frequently used even today as a means of explaining
the individual properties of antennas. It was not until around 1900 or even later, when
transmitting and receiving stations were being built, that a clear distinction was made
and antennas were classified as separate components of radio systems.
8GEP_WP01
Introduction
In Figure 3 it can be seen that the antenna is an important element in any radio system
because it acts like a link of a chain. So the overall performance is significantly
influenced by the performance of transmit and receive antennas.
Transmitter
Transmit
Antenna
Propagation
path
Receive
Antenna
Receiver
At first glance, modern antennas may still look very similar to the ancient model.
However they are nowadays optimized at great expense for their intended application.
Communications antenna technology primarily strives to transform one wave type into
another with as little loss as possible.
This requirement is less important in the case of test antennas, which are intended to
provide a precise measurement of the field strength at the installation site to a
connected test receiver; instead, their physical properties need to be known with high
accuracy.
The explanation of the physical parameters by which the behavior of each antenna can
be both described and evaluated is probably of wider general use; however the
following chapters can describe only a few of the many forms of antenna that are in
use today.
8GEP_WP01
where
rot (or curl) is a vector operator that describes the rotation of a threedimensional vector field,
is the current density vector,
Equation (1) is Ampere's law. It basically states that any change of the electric field
over time causes a magnetic field. Equation (2) is Faraday's law of induction, which
describes that any change of the magnetic field over time causes an electric field. The
other two equations relate to Gauss's law. (3) states that any magnetic field is solenoid
and (4) defines that the displacement current through a surface is equal to the
encapsulated charge.
From Maxwell's equations and the so called material equations
where
8GEP_WP01
The simplest solution to this equation is known as a plane wave propagating in lossfree homogenous space. For this wave, the following condition applies:
The vectors of the electric and magnetic field strength are perpendicular to each
other and mutually also to the direction of propagation (see Figure 4).
Consequently the electric and magnetic field strengths are connected to each other via
the so called impedance of free space:
2.
Only if both of them are met, the assumption that the electric field strength drops with
the factor 1/r over the distance r, can be made.
2.2 Wavelength
In linear media, any wave pattern can be described in terms of the independent
propagation of sinusoidal components. The wavelength of a sinusoidal waveform
travelling at constant speed is given by:
8GEP_WP01
For larger antennas (i.e. reflector antennas or array antennas) where the dimensions of
the antenna (L) are significantly larger compared to the wave length (L >> ), the
following approximation for the far field distance applies:
d
b
The first Fresnel ellipsoid is defined as a rotational ellipsoid with the two antennas at its
focal points. Within this ellipsoid the phase difference between two potential paths is
less than half a wavelength.
The radius (b) at the center of the ellipsoid can be calculated based on the formula:
where
b is the radius in m,
d is the distance between RX and TX in km,
and f is the frequency in GHz.
8GEP_WP01
2.5 Polarization
The polarization of an antenna is determined by the direction of the electric field . A
distinction must be made between the following types of polarizations:
Circular polarization: The magnitude of the field vector is constant, but the
direction changes and rotates around the direction of propagation.
Elliptical polarization: The magnitude and the direction of the field vector
changes and its peak position can be described by an elliptical equation.
Polarization mismatch occurs when the polarization of the receiving antenna is not
equal to the polarization of the incoming wave. Figure 7 gives an overview of the
polarization mismatch and the related loss imposed on the received signal. Note that V
means vertical, H horizontal, LHC left-hand circular and RHC right-hand circular
polarization.
The losses that occur when trying to receive a linearly polarized signal with a circularly
polarized antenna amounts to 3 dB (same vice versa) - this can usually be tolerated.
Most critical is the case where the orthogonal antenna polarization is used, because
the attenuation increases beyond all limits theoretically. In practice, most antennas
have a limited polarization decoupling, so that the loss in reality will never reach
infinity.
8GEP_WP01
PS
r
Figure 8: The isotropic radiator in homogenous space
The radiation density (often also known as the power density) can also be determined
in the far field as the product of electric and magnetic field strength in accordance with
8GEP_WP01
8GEP_WP01
10
Characterizing an antenna's radiation behavior with the two principle plane patterns is
adequate for antennas with a well-behaved pattern - meaning that not much
information is lost when just the two planes are shown.
In literature or datasheets the terms azimuth pattern or elevation pattern are also
frequently found. The term azimuth describes the reference to "the horizon" or "the
horizontal" whereas the term elevation describes the reference to "the vertical". If
these two terms are used to describe antenna radiation patterns, they assume that
during the measurement the antenna is mounted in the orientation in which it will be
normally used.
Another common designation for the two principal plane patterns are E-plane pattern
and H-plane pattern. They depend directly on the orientation of the antenna's
radiators. Consequently they are not depending on the mounting orientation of the
antenna.
Please note:
H-plane must not be mixed up with horizontal plane!
8GEP_WP01
11
Usually antenna patterns are shown as plots in polar coordinates. This has the
advantage that the radiation into all possible directions can quickly be visualized. In
some occasions (i.e. for highly directive antennas) it can also be beneficial to plot the
radiation pattern in Cartesian coordinates - because this reveals more details of the
main beam and adjacent side lobes (see Figure 13).
Side lobe
Main beam
suppression
Side lobes
Nulls
From the radiation pattern the following additional parameters can be derived (see
Figure 14)
The side lobe suppression (or side lobe level) is a measure of the relation
between the main lobe and the highest side lobe.
The half-power beamwidth (HPBW) is the angle between the two points in the
main lobe of an antenna pattern that are down from the maximum by 3 dB. It is
usually defined for both principal plane patterns.
The front-to-back ratio specifies the level of radiation from the back of a
directional antenna. It is the ratio of the peak gain in forward direction to the gain
in the reverse (180) direction. It is usually expressed in dB.
Back
lobe
side
Side lobes
3dB
HPBW
Main lobe
Null
Figure 14: Further parameters in the radiation pattern
8GEP_WP01
12
3.3 Directivity
The directivity factor D is defined as the ratio of the radiation intensity Fmax obtained
in the main direction of radiation to the radiation intensity F i that would be generated by
a loss-free isotropic radiator with the same radiated power Pt. The radiation intensity
can be replaced by the power density represented by the Poynting vector as shown
below:
with
perpendicular to and
The power density is measured at the same distance r from the antennas. The
following thus applies:
3.4 Gain
Corresponding to the directivity factor, the gain G is the ratio of the radiation intensity
Fmax obtained in the main direction of radiation to the radiation intensity F i0, that would
be generated by a loss-free isotropic radiator with the same input power Pt0.
In contrast to the directivity factor, the antenna efficiency is taken into account in
the above equation since the following applies:
For an antenna with efficiency = 100%, this means that gain and directivity are equal.
In practice this is hardly the case, so the gain, which can be easily determined during
measurements, is the parameter which is more frequently used.
Gain and directivity are often expressed in logarithmic form:
Contrary to common rules and standards, it is well established practice to indicate the
reference with an additional letter after dB:
8GEP_WP01
13
Although the effective area of an antenna can well be conceived as a real area
perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the incident wave, it is not necessarily
identical with the geometrical area Ag of the antenna. The relationship between the
effective and the geometrical areas is described by the aperture efficiency q
The effective area of an antenna can be converted to the gain and vice versa by
means of the formula:
This is the impedance present at the antenna feed point. Its real part Rin can be split up
into the radiation resistance RR and the loss resistance RL
It should be noted however that the radiation resistance, being the quotient of the
radiated power and the square of the RMS value of the antenna current, is spatially
dependent. This applies also to the antenna current itself. Consequently, when
specifying the radiation resistance, its location on the antenna needs to be indicated.
8GEP_WP01
14
Quite commonly the antenna feed point is specified, and equally often the current
maximum. The two points coincide for some, but by no means for all types of antenna.
The imaginary part Xin of the input impedance disappears if the antenna is operated at
resonance. Electrically very short linear antennas have capacitive impedance values
(Xin < 0), whereas electrically too long linear antennas can be recognized by their
inductive imaginary part (Xin > 0).
Discontinuity
Forward Power
Total power
Reflected power
8GEP_WP01
15
The amount of reflected power can be calculated based on the equivalent circuit
diagram of a transmit antenna (see Figure 16).
ZS
RS
XS
RR
RL
Zin
Xin
If the condition for matching is not satisfied, then some power may be reflected back
and this leads to the creation of standing waves, which are characterized by a
parameter called Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR).
The VSWR is defined (as implicated by its name) as the ratio of the maximum and
minimum voltages on a transmission line. However it is also possible to calculate
VSWR from currents or power levels as the following formula shows:
|
8GEP_WP01
16
The return loss ar derives from the reflection coefficient as a logarithmic measure:
(
So there are in fact several physical parameters for describing the quality of
impedance matching; these can simply be converted from one to the other as required.
For easy conversion please refer to the table below:
8GEP_WP01
VSWR
ar
Reflected
power
1.002
0.001
60 dB
1.01
0.005
46 dB
1.1
0.05
26 dB
0.2 %
1.2
0.1
20 dB
0.8 %
1.5
0.2
14 dB
4%
2.0
0.33
9.5 dB
11.1 %
3.0
0.5
6 dB
25 %
5.0
0.67
3.5 dB
44.4 %
17
It is used in receivers in order to display the field strength surrounding the antenna
rather than the voltage level of the signal. Often it is more convenient to use the
antenna factor in logarithmic form:
Typical antenna factor values are usually specified in the antenna's documentation either in a table or graphical format. If an antenna was calibrated the exact antenna
factor values are listed in the antenna calibration document. The unit of the logarithmic
form of the antenna factor is dB/m.
When the antenna factor is known, the field strength E surrounding the antenna can be
easily calculated with the formula:
While for field strength measurements the antenna factor is commonly used as the
characterizing value of the antenna, the predominant terms in general antenna
engineering are gain and directivity factor. Therefore, it often proves useful to know the
relationship:
in order to convert between antenna factor and practical gain, which is also given in
logarithmic form as:
(
8GEP_WP01
18
where fH is the highest usable frequency and fL is the lowest usable frequency.
An antenna is said to be broadband when BW is equal or greater than 2.
There exists also a different definition of bandwidth which is valid only for narrowband
antennas:
(
8GEP_WP01
19
/2
Figure 17: Half-wave dipole
Its length is somewhat less than half a wavelength and its input impedance at
resonance is between 50 and 70 depending on its length/diameter ratio, so that a
feed cable with a common nominal impedance can easily be connected. The current
distribution on the dipole (shown by the red line in Figure 17) can be assumed to be
sinusoidal in good approximation. Its three-dimensional radiation pattern has already
been shown in 3.2 (see Figure 9). The radiation pattern in the E-plane, which is a
reference plane along which the dipole axis lies, looks like the number 8 (see Figure
12), while the radiation pattern in planes perpendicular to its axis (H-plane) is uniform.
The name "half-wave dipole" indicates that this form of antenna can be constructed
and used for one frequency only. However, experience shows that dipoles can actually
be used for receiving purposes for a wider frequency range. It would be possible to
conclude from this that half-wave dipoles could be used at least as test antennas, even
far from their resonance frequency. When used for broadband purposes, however,
conventional dipoles experience the following significant problems in practice:
8GEP_WP01
20
l/
l/
Half-wave resonance
Half-wave resonance
l/d60
l/d1000
In order to save materials and particularly weight, broadband dipoles are often
designed in the form of a cage. Another commonly used test antenna is the
biconical antenna shown in the very right.
8GEP_WP01
Above the full-wave resonance, even the radiation pattern changes as a function
of the antenna length to wavelength ratio to such an extent (see Figure 20) that it
is no longer possible to clearly determine the main direction of radiation or the
gain, for example. This effect of "splitting up the radiation pattern" is caused by the
non-ideal current distribution on the dipole when the length to wavelength ratio
becomes too large. One option to avoid this is to design the antenna rods to
function as telescopic elements, so that the antenna length can be varied to match
the operating frequency. The dipole can then be operated at resonance at every
frequency to which it is set. However this is very often not possible in practice, as
the length must be changed whenever the frequency is changed.
21
This is the
wanted
direction of
radiation
Another more practical solution is to alter the current distribution on the antenna
(for instance by reactive elements, resonant circuits or ferrite rings) in such a way
that at higher frequencies only part of the antenna is activated. This keeps the
ratio of wavelength to antenna length almost constant even though the frequency
may vary. Electrically this solution is more or less the same as the telescopic
antenna described before, but with no need for the user to go to any effort or
expense.
8GEP_WP01
22
The conducting surface on which the monopole is erected plays an important part in
enabling the reflection principle to take effect. Even on reasonably conducting ground
(such as a field of wet grass) and particularly on poorly conducting ground (dry sand) it
is usual and helpful to put out a ground net of wires (commonly also called radials).
Figure 22 shows the influence of ground conductivity on the vertical pattern of a
monopole antenna:
Figure 22: Vertical pattern of a monopole for perfectly conducting ground (A) and poor ground (B)
135
8GEP_WP01
23
90
8GEP_WP01
24
Even though this configuration does not produce strongly focused radiation, it however
exhibits a sharply defined null towards the backside which can effectively be used to
suppress interfering signals.
By superimposing the diagrams obtained by combining two or several radiators
arranged at defined distances and with defined phase shifts, directional patterns can
be generated whose directivity is limited mainly by the available space to setup the
number of required radiators.
Instead of feeding the radiators via cables as shown in Figure 24, the principle of
radiation coupling is mostly applied in practice, with only one radiator being fed from
the cable and the remaining elements activated by this radiator. Yagi-Uda antennas,
which are commonly used for the reception of TV and VHF sound broadcast signals,
have typically between 4 and 30 elements and yield gain values of 10 dB and more.
The possibility of changing the direction of the main beam of a highly directive antenna
by purely electronic means is utilized to an increasing extent also with antenna arrays
for very high frequencies (e.g. for satellite radio services). The antennas used are
referred to as planar antennas and mostly consist of a dipole curtain which, in
contrast to curtain antennas, is installed in front of a conductive plane. This array can
also be implemented by etching the radiators as tracks into a printed circuit board
(microstrip antenna). In this way, even large arrays of antennas can be implemented
for the microwave frequency range with high precision and efficiency.
8GEP_WP01
25
Direction of radiation
l4
l1
l2
l3
d3
d2
d1
Active region
Figure 26: Log-periodic dipole antenna
This antenna type is characterized by its active and passive regions. The antenna is
fed starting at the front (i.e. with the shortest dipole). The electromagnetic wave passes
along the feed line and all dipoles that are markedly shorter than half a wavelength will
not contribute to the radiation. The dipoles in the order of half a wavelength are
brought into resonance and form the active region, which radiates the electromagnetic
wave back into the direction of the shorter dipoles. This means that the longer dipoles
located behind this active region are not reached by the electromagnetic wave at all.
The active region usually comprises of 3 to 5 dipoles and its location obviously varies
with frequency. The lengths of the shortest and longest dipoles of an LPDA determine
the maximum and minimum frequencies at which it can be used.
Due to the fact that at a certain frequency only some of the dipoles contribute to the
radiation, the directivity (and therefore also the gain) that can be achieved with LPDAs
is relatively small in relation to the overall size of the antenna. However, the advantage
of the LPDA is its large bandwidth which is - in theory - only limited by physical
constraints.
The radiation pattern, of an LPDA is almost constant over the entire operating
frequency range. In the H-plane it exhibits a half-power beamwidth of approx. 120,
while the E-plane pattern is typically 60 to 80 wide. The beamwidth in the H-plane
can be reduced to values of approx. 65 by stacking two LPDAs in V-shape. (see
Figure 27)
8GEP_WP01
26
V-stacked LPDA antennas have E- and H-plane patterns with very similar half power
beamwidths (see Figure 28). Additionally they feature approx. 1.5 dB more gain
compared to a normal LPDA.
Figure 28: Radiation pattern of a V-stacked LPDA - E-plane (black), H-plane (blue)
8GEP_WP01
27
S/N
PS
PN
S/N
PE
PS
PN
PE
Antenna length
Figure 29: Active antenna basic principle
The S/N will get affected only at a point where the level of the external noise PN falls
below the receiver noise PE which is influenced only by the technical parameters of the
receiver itself.
In chapter 3 (see Figure 18) it was already shown that shortening the radiator is
associated with extreme changes in the impedance. For active rod or dipole antennas
this is compensated by feeding the signal voltage on the terminals of the antenna
directly to a very high-impedance active component (usually a field effect transistor)
which acts as an impedance transformer and also commonly amplifies at the same
time. Active antennas are therefore by definition antennas in which an active element
is attached directly to the electrically short radiators (i.e. of a dipole as shown in Figure
30), and are not to be confused with systems in which the output signal of a passive
antenna is looped through a preamplifier, for example.
Active antennas can obviously be used for reception only.
50
Figure 30: Active dipole antenna in principle
8GEP_WP01
28
An advantage of using active antennas is the fact that usually their radiation patterns
are no longer a function of frequency because they utilize elements of electrically short
length. By carefully tuning the active circuitry to the antenna geometry and by using
other measures, it is also possible to ensure that the antenna factor is largely
independent of frequency, so that field strength measurements can be carried out very
easily.
Active antennas are mainly but not exclusively used for lower frequencies (up to about
200 MHz) at which the noise floor in the atmosphere is very high. Due to their extreme
broadband characteristics, active antennas are being increasingly used also in the
higher frequency ranges.
One of their biggest advantages is the reduced size requirement. For example an
active rod antenna that covers HF and also part of the LF frequency range can be built
with a radiator as short as approx. 1m, while a passive antenna for a comparable
frequency range easily measures ten times this value.
When an active antenna is designed, the engineer needs to cope with two slightly
contradictory aims:
The active antenna should achieve maximum sensitivity in respect to the expected
external noise. Consequently the designer will select the active devices for
optimum noise figure and noise match.
The active antenna should have good protection against interfering strong signals
- no matter if they are generated internally or externally of the active antenna
circuitry. Therefore the designer will select active devices with high intercept point
values (IP2 and IP3).
Unfortunately it is not possible to reach both aims simultaneously and the margin
between them is called the dynamic range. Active antenna will always have a limited
dynamic range, which may render their usage difficult in close vicinity of strong
transmitters or at locations where high field strength values exist due to other reasons.
In summary, active antennas have the following advantages and disadvantages
Advantage
Disadvantage
8GEP_WP01
29
Care must be taken, when the gain of an active antenna is specified. There are two
definitions to know in this context:
The electronic gain GT is the ratio of the received power into the nominal resistance
and the maximum received power which can be extracted from the field with an
antenna of equal directional characteristics.
The practical gain Gpract is the ratio of received power into the nominal resistance Pr
and the received power of a loss-free omnidirectional reference antenna (isotropic
radiator) Pri.
Consequently, the gain alone does not allow drawing any conclusions about the
radiation pattern of the active antenna or its field strength sensitivity.
The field strength sensitivity values are usually specified in the documentation of the
antenna. In order to have comparable results the bandwidth and the achieved signalto-noise ratio (S/N) must always be given in conjunction with the minimum field
strength values that can be detected (see Figure 31).
8GEP_WP01
30
Appendix
5 Appendix
5.1 References
References and recommended further reading
8GEP_WP01
Author
Title
Publisher
Balanis
Antenna Theory
Beckmann
Beckmann
Braun
Siemens
Chatterjee
Collin
McGraw-Hill
Davies
Ionospheric Radio
Peregrinus
Dombrowski
Antennen
(Antennas)
Porta Mnchen
Grosskopf
Wellenausbreitung (2 volumes)
(Wave Propagation)
Hochschultaschenbcher
Heilmann
Antennen (3 volumes)
(Antennas)
Hochschultaschenbcher
Hock/Pauli
Antennentechnik
(Antenna Engineering)
Expert
Jasik
Antennas
McGraw-Hill
Kraus
Antennas
McGraw-Hill
Lee
Howard W. Sams
Lee
McGraw-Hill
Maslin
HF Communications
Pitman
Meinke/Gundlach
Springer
Reithofer
UKW-Berichte
Rohner
Antenna Basics
Rothammel
Antennenbuch
(The Antenna Book)
Franckh-Kosmos
Spindler
Franzis
Stirner
Antennen (3 volumes)
(Antennas)
Hthig
Wiesner
Siemens
Zuhrt
Elektromagnetische Strahlungsfelder
(Electromagnetic Radiation Fields)
Springer
Technik Berlin
31
Regional contact
Energy-efficient products