American Fork Policy For Mid Block Crossings
American Fork Policy For Mid Block Crossings
American Fork Policy For Mid Block Crossings
GuidelinesandStandardsforMidBlock
PedestrianCrossings
I.
ProblemStatement:
A. PedestrianNeeds
Pedestriansdesiretotravelfromorigintodestinationinasnearastraightlineasis
possible.Whenpedestriantravelinvolvescrossingastreetorhighway,many
pedestrianschoosetocrossatamidblocklocationwhenaprotectedcrosswalkatan
intersectionistoofarawayortooinconvenient.
B. CrosswalkStudies
In2005theresultsofastudyconductedbytheFederalHighwayAdministrationwas
publishedontheSafetyEffectsofMarkedVersusUnmarkedCrosswalksat
UncontrolledLocations.
Thisstudyinvolvedananalysisof5yearsofpedestriancrashesat1,000marked
crosswalksand1,000matchedunmarkedcomparisonsites.Allsitesinthisstudyhadno
trafficsignalorstopsignontheapproaches.Thestudyresultsrevealedthatontwolane
roads,thepresenceofamarkedcrosswalkaloneatanuncontrolledlocationwas
associatedwithnodifferenceinpedestriancrashrate,comparedtoanunmarked
crosswalk.Further,onmultilaneroadswithtrafficvolumesaboveabout12,000vehicles
perday,havingamarkedcrosswalkwasassociatedwithahigherpedestriancrashrate
comparedtoanunmarkedcrosswalk.
Inotherwords,pedestriansafetyontwolaneroadswasnotfoundtobedifferent,
whetherthecrosswalkwasmarkedorunmarkedandonmultilaneroadspedestrian
safetywasfoundtobeevenworse.
C. SolutioninGeneral
Markedcrosswalksalone(i.e.,withouttrafficcalmingtreatments,trafficsignalsand
pedestriansignalswhenwarranted,orothersubstantialcrossingimprovement)are
insufficientandshouldnotbeusedunlessimprovementscanbemadetoincreasethe
safetytopedestrians.
Thepurposeofthisinstructionistohelpdeterminewhenamarkedcrosswalkatan
uncontrolledlocationissaferthananunmarkedcrosswalkandtoprovidethe
appropriatesignageaccordingtotheTheManualonUniformTrafficControlDevices
(2003),(MUTCD).
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page1
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
ThispolicydoesnotcovertherulesforSchoolCrosswalkZones.WhenaSchool
CrosswalkZoneiswarrantedtheUtahTrafficControlsforSchoolZones2005Edition,
Part7SupplementtoTheManualonUniformTrafficControlDevices(2003),mustbe
used.
II.
General
A.ResidentialStreets
Speedsandvolumesonresidentialstreetsshouldbelowerthanonhigherclassification
streetsandshouldnotnormallyrequirepavementmarkingsorsignstoindicate
crosswalks.Requestsforcrosswalksonthesestreetsmaybeanindicationofother
trafficconcernswhichcanbedeterminedbyatrafficstudy.Basedonatrafficstudy,
crosswalkmarkingsorotherappropriatemeasuressuchastrafficcalmingmaybe
implemented.
B. MidblockCrossings
Amidblockcrosswalkisdefinedasacrosswalkatalocationotherthananintersection
withtrafficcontrolsforbothdirectionsoftraffic.Ifitisdeterminedthatpedestrianswill
crosstheflowoftrafficatmidblockratherthanusinganintersectionwithtraffic
controlstostoptheflowoftrafficandallowpedestrianstosafelycross,amidblock
crossingmaythenbeconsidered.
Crosswalklocationsmustallowmotoriststosafelyyieldforpedestrians.Sightdistance
roadwaygeometricsandthepotentialforrearendtypeaccidentsshouldbeevaluated.
Streetswithtwotrafficlanesinthesamedirectionpresentapotentialhazardwhena
vehicleinonelaneyieldstoapedestrianandobstructsthesightlineofthepedestrian
foramotoristintheotherlane.Midblockcrossingonroadwayswithtwolanesof
trafficinthesamedirectionwillnotnormallybeconsidered.Anengineeringtraffic
studymustbeconductedtoensurethesafeuseofamidblockcrossingispossible.
Thesafetyofmidblockcrosswalksisdependentonthejudgementofthepedestrian
andthemotorist.Engineeringstandardscanhelpbymakingcrosswalksmorevisible
andtoensuretheyareinstalledatsafelocations.
C. TrafficEngineeringStudy
Atrafficengineeringstudyisrequiredtodetermineifthecriteriaandwarrantsaremet
foramarkedcrosswalkataparticularlocation,andtodeterminethelevelofmarking
justified.
Thelevelofdetailrequiredforatrafficengineeringstudywillvarywiththelocation
underconsideration.EachcasemustbereviewedbythePoliceDept.,Engineering,and
PublicWorks.
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page2
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
Theengineeringstudyincludesconsiderationof:
1. Speedandtrafficvolumedataonstreetsbeingcrossed.
2. Pedestrianvolume,ages,andlevelsofmobility.
3. Locationofpedestrianoriginanddestinationpointsandcrossingpatterns.
4. Existingsidewalknetworkandsidewalkramps.
5. Sightdistancesandsightobstructions.
6. Streetcharacteristicsincludinggrades,curvature,pavementwidths,andnumber
ofvehicleandbicyclelanes.
7. Locationofadjacentdriveways.
8. Onstreetparking.
9. Streetlighting.
10. Locationofdrainagestructures.
11. Distancetonearestprotectedormarkedcrossing.
12. Trafficsignalprogression.
13. Potentialforrearendaccidents.
14. Vehicleaccidenthistory.
III
WarrantsandGuidelinesforPedestrianCrossings
A. General
Markedcrosswalksareintendedtoprovidepedestrianswithafeelingofconfidencethat
itissafetocrossastreetatthemarkedlocationandtogivemotoristsadequatewarning
toexpectpedestrianstobeintheroadway.
Theyarealsotoencouragepedestrianstocrossroadwayswherethereareadequate
facilitiestoaccomplishthesepurposes.
ATrafficEngineeringStudyisrequiredwhenevaluatingalocationformarked
crosswalks.Thefollowingaregeneralcriteriatobesatisfiedinadditiontothewarrant
criteriashowninsectionIIIC.1.whenconsideringinstallationofmarkedcrosswalks:
1. Markedcrosswalksmustconnecttoestablishedsidewalksatbothends.
2. ADAaccessiblerampsshallbeincludedatbothendsofcrosswalkinstallations
unlessthereareengineeringreasonstheycannotbeprovided.
3. Adequatestreetlightingmustbeprovidedforthesafetyofpedestrians.
4. Streetparkingmustberestrictedadjacenttocrosswalkstoallowforadequate
sightlinesforboththemotoristsandthepedestrians.Thelengthoftheparking
restrictionshallbebasedonanengineeringstudy.MUTCDrequires50ftNo
Parkingminimum.
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page3
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
B. ResidentialStreets
Markedcrosswalkswillgenerallynotbeinstalledonresidentialstreets.Marked
crosswalkswillbeevaluatedforuseonresidentialstreetswhenindicatedbyoneor
moreofthefollowing:
1. Thestreetintersectswithacollectororhigherclassificationstreetandthe
averagedailytrafficvolumeontheminorstreetexceeds1000vehiclesperday.
2. Thecrossinglocationiswithinadesignatedschoolzoneorisakeyelementofa
designatedschoolwalkingrouteplan.
3. Atrafficengineeringstudyindicatesasafetyproblemthatcanbeaddressedbya
markedcrosswalk.
Evaluationofmarkingacrosswalkonaresidentialstreetrequiresanengineeringtraffic
studyandsatisfyingtherequirementsofIII.A.
C. MidBlockCrossings
1.WarrantCriteria
Acrosswalkatamidblocklocationmaybeinstalledwhenthelocationsatisfiesthe
generalcriteriaofIII.A.andmeetsallofthewarrantcriteriaforamidblockcrosswalk
listedbelow:
a Thecrossingvolumeisnotcausedbyacorrectablegapinthesidewalksystem.
b Thereisaminimumdistanceof600feettothenearestprotectedcrossing.A
protectedcrossingisacrossingcontrolledbystopsignsorsignalsoratagrade
separation.
c Engineeringstudyindicatesnounsafevisibilityorsiteconditionswouldbe
created.
d Postedspeedis35mphorlessand85percentilespeediswithin5mphofthe
postedspeed.
e ThepedestrianandvehiclevolumesmustcrossintheINSTALLCROSSWALK
areaofChart1inAppendixA.
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page4
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
Whenamidblockcrosswalkiswarrantedthefollowingguidelinesshallbeused:
Level3SpecialEmphasispavementmarkingsshallbeused(SeeFig.2inAppendixA,
andFigure3B16oftheMUTCD)
AdvancedWarningsigns(R16)shallbeplacedinadvancewhendictatedbyan
EngineeringStudy(SeeFig.4inAppendixA,andR16signagefromtheMUTCD)
CrossingtreatmentsasshowninSectionIV.C.shouldbeconsideredwhentheAADT
is12,000veh/dayorgreater.
2.ExceptionstoWarrantCriteria
Thepedestrianvolumeandvehiclevolumewarrantsmaybewaivedforanyofthe
followingsituations:
a. Thecrossinglocationisakeyelementofadesignatedschoolwalkingrouteplan
b. Atrafficengineeringstudyindicatesasafetyproblemthatcanbeaddressedbya
markedmidblockcrosswalk.
c. Wherepedestrianusewoulddictate,suchasneartransitstops,bikecorridors,
parksandmultiusepathcrossings.
D.MajorIntersections
1. UnsignalizedIntersections
a. Allwaystopcontrolledintersection
ProvidedthegeneralcriteriainSectionIII.A.issatisfied,allwaystopcontrolled
intersectionsshallusethefollowingguidelines:
Ataminimum,crosswalksshallhaveLevel1markings.(SeeFig.1inAppendix
A,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Level2or3markingsmaybeusedbasedoncrossinglength,speed,and
pedestrianandvehiclevolumes.Yieldtopedestrianssignsmaybeplaced
inadvanceofallwaystopcontrolledintersections.(SeeFig.1&2in
AppendixA,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Whencrossinglengthsaregreaterthan36feet,pedestrianrefugeislands
shallbeevaluated.
b. Partialstopcontrolledintersection
Eachapproachatapartialstopcontrolledintersectionwillbeeitherstop
controlledoruncontrolled.Crosswalkmarkingsatpartialstopcontrolled
intersectionswillbeevaluatedbasedonthecontroloftheapproachbeing
consideredasindicatedbelow.Teeintersectionswithheavyturningvolumes
andhighlyskewedintersectionsmayrequireadditionalconsideration.
i. Stopcontrolledapproaches
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page5
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
ProvidedthegeneralcriteriainSectionIII.Aissatisfied,stopcontrolled
approachesshallusethefollowingguidelines:
Ataminimum,crosswalksshallhaveLevel1markings.(SeeFig.1in
AppendixA,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Level2or3markingsmaybeusedbasedoncrossinglength,speed,and
volumes.(SeeFig.1&2inAppendixA,andSection3B.17oftheMUTCD)
Yieldtopedestrians(W11A2),signsmaybeplacedinadvanceofstop
controlledapproachesatintersections.
ii.Uncontrolledapproachtointersection
Thissectionappliestotheuncontrolledapproachesofpartialstopcontrolled
intersectionsthataresimilartoamidblockcrosswalkinthatthepedestrian
iscrossinguncontrolledtraffic.Thewarrantsformidblockcrosswalks,as
statedinsectionIII.C.1shallbeusedwhenevaluatingcrosswalksacrossthe
uncontrolledapproachesatanintersection.ThePedestrianandvehicle
volumesmaybewaivedasindicatedinSectionIII.C.2.Providedthegeneral
criteriainSectionIII.A.issatisfied,andthemodifiedmidblockwarrantsare
satisfied,uncontrolledapproachesshallusethefollowingguidelines:
Markedcrosswalksonuncontrolledapproachesofintersectionsshallbe
Level3markings.
Yieldtopedestrians(W11A2),signsshouldbeplacedinadvanceof
crosswalksacrossuncontrolledapproachesatintersections.
CrossingtreatmentsasshowninSectionIV.C.maybeconsidered.
2. SignalizedIntersections
ProvidedthecriteriainSectionIII.A.aresatisfied,signalizedintersectionsshall
usethefollowingguidelines:
Ataminimum,crosswalksshallhaveLevel1markings.
Level2or3markingsmaybeusedbasedoncrossinglength,vehicle
speedandvolumes.
Signalsshallprovideenoughtimetoallowpedestrianstocrossthestreet
safelybasedonawalkingspeedof3.5feetpersecond,thisratemaybe
reducedatlocationswherethepredominatewalkingspeedisslower.
Actuatedsignalsshouldhavepedestriansignals(WALK,DONTWALK)
activatedbypushbuttons.
Pedestriansignals(WALK,DONTWALK)shallbeinstalledwhenthe
crosswalkcrossesmorethantwolanesofsamedirectiontrafficorwhen
theaveragedailyenteringtrafficvolumeexceeds10,000vpd.
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page6
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
IV.
STANDARDS
A. PavementMarkings
Crosswalksshallbeaminimumof10feetorthesamewidthastheapproach
walkwayifthewalkwayiswiderthan10feet.Whentheguidelinesandwarrants
sectionofthispolicyindicatestheuseofcrosswalkmarkings,oneofthefollowing
threelevelsofmarkingshallbeused:
Level1Standardcrosswalkmarkingsaretwo12inchwhitelines,6feetapart.
(Fig.1)
Level2Enhancedstandardcrosswalkmarkingsaresimilartostandardcrosswalk
markingsexceptthewidthofthewhitelinesisanywherefrom15incheswideto24
incheswide.(SeeAppendixA,Fig.1)
Enhancedstandardmarkingsmaybeusedwhenanyoneofthefollowingapply:
Crosswalkiswiderthan10feet
Crossingmorethan2lanesoftraffic
Intersectionenteringvolumeexceeds900vehiclesperhourforanyone
hour
Yieldtopedestrians(W11A2),signisplacedinadvanceofcrosswalk
Acrossminorstreetattwowaystopcontrolledwhenmajorstreetspeed
limitexceeds35mph
Level3Specialemphasiscrosswalkmarkingsconsistofwhite2footwidebars
witha1footspaceat90degreestothecrosswalk.(SeeAppendixA,Fig.2)The
widthofthebarsandspacesmaybeincreasedupto36inchesatsomelocations
toallowthetiresofvehiclestotrackthroughthespaces.
SpecialEmphasisMarkingsmaybeusedatanyofthefollowinglocations:
Withinschoolzonesorasshownonaschoolwalkingrouteplan
Whenanengineeringstudyindicatestheneedforadditionalvisibility
Wherecrosswalktreatmentsareusedthatresultinraisedpavements
SpecialEmphasisMarkingsshallbeusedatthefollowinglocations:
Wheremidblockcrossingsareinstalled
Acrossuncontrolledtrafficatpartialstopcontrolledintersections
Wherecrossingsareinstalledonstreetshavinganaveragedailytraffic
volumeof4000vehiclesperday.
HighPedestrianAreasInbusinessdistricts,campuses,commercialareasandother
highpedestrianareaswherepedestrianactivityistobeencouragedandwhere
significantdistractionstomotoristsandpedestriansarelikelytooccur,engineering
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page7
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
judgementcanbeusedtoimplementahigherlevelofpavementmarkingthanwouldbe
indicatedbythecrosswalkmarkingstandards.Careshouldbetakentoinsurethat
specialemphasismarkingsatsomelocationsdonotweakenordetractfromother
crosswalkswherelowerlevelmarkingsareused.
B. FlashingYellowCrosswalkLights
Flashingyellowlightsmaybeusedatmidblockcrosswalksifanengineeringstudy
indicatesaneedtoincreaseawarenessofthecrosswalklocationorthepresenceof
pedestrians,(SeeAppendixA,Fig4).
Flashingyellowlightsdonotassignrightofway.
Improperinterpretationsofthepurposeormeaningofflashinglightscanleadto
conflictingmovementsandshouldbeconsideredwhenevaluatingtheuseofflashing
yellowlights.Forflashingyellowlightstobeeffective,theymustcommandrespect
frommotorists.Ifthelightsflashedcontinually,amotoristwouldloserespectand
ignoretheinstallationafterbeingfalselywarnedseveraltimes.Therefore,when
flashingyellowlightsareusedatcrosswalks,theyshouldbeactivatedbypedestrians.
Pedestrianactuatedlightsflashwhenapedestrianpushesabuttonorpassesasensor.
Theselightsindicatethepresenceofapedestrian.Thelightscanbemountedwiththe
crosswalksignsatthesideoftheroad,overthedrivinglanesonmastarms,orinthe
pavementwithairporttaxiwaystylelights.Forcrossingmultilanesamedirectiontraffic,
overheadorinpavementlightsarerecommended.
Figure3,AppendixA,showsatypicalMidblockcrosswalkandFigure4,AppendixA,
showsaMidblockcrosswalkwithflashingyellowwarninglights.
C. CrosswalkTreatments
Thepurposeofcrosswalktreatmentsistoimprovesafetyby:
Reducingvehiclespeedatthecrosswalk
Reducingexposureofthepedestriantovehicles
Increasingawarenessofthepresenceofpedestrians
Increasingvisibilityofthecrosswalk
1. PedestrianWarrantedTrafficSignals
Trafficsignalscanbeinstalledatanintersectionormidblockbasedonpedestrian
volumesifwarrantedbytheManualonUniformTrafficControlDevices.(MUTCD)
Whentrafficsignalsareinstalledbasedonpedestrianvolumes,pedestriansignals
mustbeused.(WALK,DONTWALK)
2. GradeSeparationStructure
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page8
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
Whereitisnotpossibletoaccommodatepedestrianswithatgradecrossings,grade
separationmaybeconsidered.Thesefacilitiesareexpensiveandcanaddoutof
directiontravel.Therefore,gradeseparationshouldonlybelocatedwheretheiruse
wouldbemaximized.Toensureproperuse,thesefacilitiesmustbeopen,withgood
visibilityandeasilyaccessible.
3. CenterMedians
Centermedianscanimprovecrossingsafetybyprovidingapedestrianrefugewhich
willallowthepedestriantocrosseachdirectionoftrafficseparately.Centermedians
shallonlybeinstalledwherepavementwidthsaresufficienttoallowforthesafe
clearanceofpedestriansfrommovingtrafficandtheresultingtrafficlanesare
sufficientinwidthforthepostedspeedlimit.Crosswalksleadingtothecenter
medianwillbeoffsettoplaceemphasisonthemedianasastoppingplacefor
pedestrians.Atypicalmidblockcrossingwithapedestrianmedianandsignlocation
isshowninAppendixA,Fig.5.Whenacentermedianisusedandthereisalsoon
streetparking,bulboutsmaybeconsideredinconjunctionwiththecentermedian.
4. BulbOuts
Bulboutsforpedestriansshouldbeconsideredwhenwarrantsexistforpedestrian
crossingsatmidblockormajorintersectionsandthepavementwidthisgreater
than32feet.Bulboutsfortrafficcalmingpurposesmaybeinstalledonstreetsof
lesserwidthsbutarenotconsiderednecessarysolelyforpedestrianpurposes.A
typicalmidblockcrossingwithbulboutsisshownonAppendixA,Fig.6.The
illustrationalsoindicatesthelocationofsigning.
APPENDIX A
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page9
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page10
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page11
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page12
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page13
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page14
AMERICANFORKCITYSTANDARDS
PolicyforPedestrianCrossings
Page15