Employee Performance Appraisal Form
Employee Performance Appraisal Form
Employee Performance Appraisal Form
In this file, you can ref useful information about employee performance appraisal form such as
employee performance appraisal formmethods, employee performance appraisal form tips,
employee performance appraisal formforms, employee performance appraisal form phrases If
you need more assistant for employee performance appraisal form, please leave your comment at
the end of file.
Other useful material for you:
performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases
performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms
performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal
==================Overview
It is the responsibility of University supervisors to evaluate the job-related performance of all
staff members each fiscal year. A Staff Performance Appraisal Form is to be completed for each
staff member by the immediate supervisor to evaluate job-related performance over the twelvemonth rating period. The Staff Performance Appraisal Form is available in two separate appraisal
forms, one to be used by the evaluator for staff employees who supervise others, and one to be
used by the evaluator for staff employees who do not supervise others. The Staff Self-Appraisal
Form is a separate form.
Staff Performance Appraisal Form (Supervisory Role)
This form is to be used by the evaluator for staff employees who supervise other staff. The form
includes performance standards, as well as performance standards specific to and applicable to
those staff employees who are in a supervisory or managerial role.
Staff Performance Appraisal Form (Non-Supervisory Role)
This form is to be used by the evaluator for staff employees who do not supervise other staff.
Staff Self-Appraisal Form
The self-appraisal form is a separate form that is designed to provide an insightful and reflective
review, and to encourage dialogue between the supervisor and employee.
Annual Goals Form
This form can be used as a supplement to the Staff Performance Appraisal Form and is an
optional step in the annual performance appraisal process. The purpose of this form is to help
staff and their supervisors establish goals at the beginning of the appraisal year and, criteria on
which success may be measured at the end of the appraisal year.
Forms
All three appraisal forms are available as editable Microsoft Word documents. Supervisors are
encouraged to complete and save the staff performance appraisal forms electronically, and
employees can do the same with their self-appraisal form:
1. Staff Performance Appraisal Form - Supervisory Role (Editable MS Word Doc)
2. Staff Performance Appraisal Form - Non-Supervisory Role (Editable MS Word
Doc)
3. Staff Self-Appraisal Form - (Editable MS Word Doc)
4. Annual Goals Form - (Editable MS Word Doc)
5. Guidelines for Supervisors: Completing a Staff Performance Appraisal
Form (PDF)
If preferred, PDF versions of these forms are available to be printed and completed manually:
Supervisors: In evaluating an employees performance, you are to identify strengths and areas
of performance which require improvement. You are asked to provide examples of the
employees performance to illustrate the ratings you give. Examples based on your own
observations work best. However, second hand observations are permissible if you have verified
the information. Such examples clarify your message. After the meeting, follow up on the plans
mutually established by you and the employee.
Employees: The more involved you are in the performance appraisal session, the more effective
the process is likely to be. Be prepared by completing the self-appraisal form.
Resources
There are only two approved staff performance appraisal methods at the University the
University of Pittsburgh Staff Performance Appraisal Form or the Performance Impact
Workplace program. Performance Impact Workplace (PIW) program users should continue
utilizing the software that was previously installed in your department.
The Office of Human Resources, through Organization Development, is available to assist you
and your staff during the Appraisal period. We can work with department supervisors on how to
write clear and measurable goals, collect meaningful feedback, provide coaching throughout the
year, and plan for and conduct a meaningful performance evaluation. If you find that the staff
performance appraisal method does not quite meet the needs of your organization, please let us
know. We can work with your organization so that the system works better for you and your
staff. Please call your HR recruiter or Organization Development consultant to follow up on any
of these services.
==================
1. Essay Method
In this method the rater writes down the employee
description in detail within a number of broad categories
like, overall impression of performance, promoteability
of employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of
performing jobs, strengths and weaknesses and training
needs of the employee. Advantage It is extremely
useful in filing information gaps about the employees
that often occur in a better-structured checklist.
Disadvantages It its highly dependent upon the writing
skills of rater and most of them are not good writers.
They may get confused success depends on the memory
power of raters.
3. Rating Scale
4. Checklist method
Under this method, checklist of statements of traits of
employee in the form of Yes or No based questions is
prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or
checking and HR department does the actual evaluation.
Advantages economy, ease of administration, limited
training required, standardization. Disadvantages Raters
biases, use of improper weighs by HR, does not allow
rater to give relative ratings
5.Ranking Method
The ranking system requires the rater to rank his
subordinates on overall performance. This consists in
simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method,
the ranking of an employee in a work group is done
against that of another employee. The relative position of
each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It
may also be done by ranking a person on his job
performance against another member of the competitive
group.
Advantages of Ranking Method
Employees are ranked according to their
performance levels.
It is easier to rank the best and the worst
employee.
Limitations of Ranking Method
The whole man is compared with another
whole man in this method. In practice, it is very difficult
to compare individuals possessing various individual
traits.
This method speaks only of the position where an
employee stands in his group. It does not test anything
about how much better or how much worse an employee
is when compared to another employee.
When a large number of employees are working,
ranking of individuals become a difficult issue.
There is no systematic procedure for ranking
individuals in the organization. The ranking system does
not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements.