Final AP HDR
Final AP HDR
Final AP HDR
MESSAGE
It gives me immense pleasure in introducing the first ever Human Development Report published
by the Centre for Economic & Social Studies (CESS), a competent and autonomous research
agency, for Andhra Pradesh.
I am told that CESS, while preparing the report, has made extensive work involving a large
number of stakeholders in order to ensure a realistic approach.
In fact, the Government is also keen to adopt a realistic approach in assessing ground realities
and formulating programs with human face, and achieve sustainable and balanced growth in
all areas. Development should reflect not only in economic growth and higher GSDP, but also
in improvement of quality of life of even weaker sections.
I hope this report will help in reassessing our investment strategies, if necessary, and identifying
areas for further attention, and guide to accelerate the implementation of various developmental
and welfare programs like ‘Jalayagnam’, INDIRAMMA, ‘Aarogyasri’ and IT to all cities.
In other words, I am confident that Andhra Pradesh Human Development Report (APHDR) will
serve as an important tool in making a comprehensive planning towards achieving
‘Haritandhrapradesh’ wherein every sector will experience even and simultaneous development,
paving way for emergence of Andhra Pradesh as the model state in India.
(Y.S.RAJASEKHARA REDDY)
MINISTER FOR FINANCE, PLANNING & HYDERABAD
K. ROSAIAH LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MESSAGE
I am glad that our State Andhra Pradesh is finally bringing out its maiden Report on Human
Development.
I have noticed that the first ”Andhra Pradesh Human Development Report” is an important
research-cum-policy document, prepared by an academically competent and autonomous
research institute, viz., Centre for Economic and Social Studies (CESS). As I understand, economic
development does not mean the growth of income alone but also calls for improvement in the
quality of life of our people. Good governance should facilitate realization of these dreams of
people.
The report encompasses Human Development Indices, computed both for State and Districts
as well. The Report focuses on the levels of achievement, the areas of concern and the possible
ways of progress with reference to crucial socio-economic indicators. The purpose of the Report
is to provide an independent and objective assessment of the status of human development in
different districts of Andhra Pradesh and in the State as a whole. With due importance attached
to the outcomes of the report, our endeavour is to give highest priority to the steady improvement
of human development conditions in the State.
I am hopeful that the Report would be found useful for all, especially the Policy makers,
academicians and researchers.
(K.ROSAIAH)
A.K. GOEL, I.A.S PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Special Chief Secretary to Government Government of Andhra Pradesh
Hyderabad.
MESSAGE
I am extremely delighted to be associated with the release of first ever Human Development Report for
Andhra Pradesh. This economic exercise got delayed by more than half a decade. Anyway, better late
than never.
Human development is defined by the United Nations Development Programme as enlarging the range
of people’s choices. The most important amongst these wide ranging choices are enjoying a long and
healthy life, be educated and to have access to resources required for a decent standard of living, and
thereby making Human development both as means and ends as well.
Andhra Pradesh has a distinction of being one of the most richly endowed natural resource-based states
in the country. Known for centuries as ‘Annapurna’, the state has a historical record of producing and
supplying rice to different parts of the country. It adopted Green Revolution quite early. The state, of late,
also has decent levels of achievement in education and health sectors. However, there remains substantial
scope for improvement.
The gains of development have not benefited all areas and various sections of the people equally. The
Andhra Pradesh Human Development Report highlights these disparities in achievement levels among
various sections of the society. The much touted ‘ Inclusive growth’, in the 11th Plan document by the
Planning Commission, has a similar philosophy in achievement of a decent level of Human development
for all. I am confident that this report would enable the formulation of future strategies for further improving
the human development attainments in Andhra Pradesh.
I would like to thank the Planning Commission, Government of India, and the United Nations Development
Programme for all the assistance and support provided for the preparation of this report and look forward
to future cooperation in following up the messages of this report. I surely thank the Centre for Economic
and Social Studies (CESS), Andhra Pradesh, for bringing out this extremely useful report.
(A.K. GOEL)
United Nations Development Programme
Planning Commission
India
MESSAGE
On behalf of the Planning Commission, Government of India and the United Nations
Development Programme, we congratulate the Government of Andhra Pradesh for preparing
the first Human Development Report for the State.
The HDR comprehensively analyses various aspects that have a bearing on human development,
including governance, inclusion and environment and effectively establishes the linkages
between the facets of human development.
Primarily an agrarian economy, the State has been witnessing exemplary growth in industries,
particularly the IT industry. The Andhra Pradesh HDR analyses the challenges that a society in
such a transition faces. Important lessons have been identified on how to effectively manage
this transition.
We once again felicitate the Government of Andhra Pradesh for the preparation of its Human
Development Report.
A are: its history of social movements; it was one of the few states which
adopted the green revolution; development of participatory institutions
including self-help groups; its remarkable progress in technical education; its innovative
poverty alleviation strategies; its distinctive demographic experience; and, the state was at
the forefront in economic reforms. The experience of Andhra Pradesh with these unique
features raises several far-reaching issues on the strategies to be followed in improving
human development.
Preface
The objective of this report is to examine the experience of Andhra Pradesh in human
development at the state and district levels keeping in view these remarkable features
together with the interventions and policies of the state.
There has been a ‘turnaround’ in economic growth and fiscal performance of A.P. in
recent years. The State has to focus also on ‘inclusive growth’ as there is still a considerable
degree of poverty, inadequate human development, problems in agriculture, insufficient
quantity and quality of employment , significant regional, social and gender disparities and
problems in delivery systems. There has been considerable progress in A.P. in all these
components of inclusive growth but this has not been sufficient for achieving broad-based
and equitable development. The present government is also making efforts to have higher
and inclusive growth in which human development is an important component.
The macro environment in terms of growth and fiscal situation at both the Centre and
the state level are much better now than before. There is also greater awareness now about
improving delivery services through better governance. Andhra Pradesh should make use
of these favourable developments to improve human development in the state.
vii
It was at the invitation of the Planning Department that CESS agreed to prepare the
human development report of Andhra Pradesh. Similar to other state HDRs, this Report is
sponsored by the Planning Commission, Government of India and the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP).
The Andhra Pradesh Human Development Report (APHDR) is probably the first in
India covering the data base up to 2005-06. Thus, the report covers the fifteen year post-
reform period which is sufficient for examining the impact of economic reforms on human
development.
This report is the outcome of the collective effort of several people. A participatory
procedure has been followed in preparing the report. In addition to a state level workshop
at Hyderabad, six regional workshops were held to elicit the opinion of people on human
development issues in different locations. The regional workshops were held in Mahabubnagar
(South Telangana), Warangal (North Telangana), Visakhapatnam (North Coastal Andhra),
Preface
Guntur (South Coastal Andhra) and, Anantapur and Tirupathi (Rayalaseema). The local
organizers Dr. G. Ramachandrudu (Visakhapatnam), Dr. K. C. Suri and Dr. Narasimha Rao
(Guntur), Dr. T. Papi Reddy and Dr. MD. Iqbal Ali (Warangal), Dr. Ashok (Mahabubnagar),
Dr. Y. V. Malla Reddy (Anantapur) and Shri. Muniratnam and Dr. Rajasekhar (Tirupathi)
helped us in organizing these regional work shops. From CESS, Dr. C. Ramachandraiah,
Prof. S. Galab, Dr. E. Revathi and Dr. C. Ravi helped in organizing these workshops. We are
thankful to organizers and participants in the state level and regional workshops.
Faculty members (S.Galab, M. Gopinath Reddy, Jeena, G.K. Mitra, K.V. Narayana, R.
Nageswara Rao, C. Niranjan Rao, P. Padmanabha Rao, C. Ramachandraiah, V. Ratna Reddy,
E. Revathi, N. Sreedevi, S. Subrahmanyam) of the Centre for Economic and Social Studies
(CESS) prepared the background papers for many of the chapters of the report. We thank all
those involved. In addition, there were also a few commissioned papers from academicians
and NGOs which have been useful for some components of the report. A few parts of the
chapter on agriculture were taken from the work of Prof. D. Narasimha Reddy and Prof. V.
Nagi Reddy of ICFAI prepared the background paper on education while Prof. Rama Padma
of IIFH (Indian Institute of Family Health, Hyderabad) prepared the background paper on
demography and health. There were some inputs from Centre for Dalit Stduies (CDS) on
aspects of human development of the Dalits (SCs). We had a survey on the working of
public institutions in rural areas conducted by Development and Research Services (DRS).
For the APHDR, Dr. S. Irudaya Rajan of Centre for Development Studies along with Dr.
Mohanchandran did Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) estimations for the year 2001. We are thankful
to Prof. D. Narasimha Reddy, Prof. V. Nagi Reddy, Shri. G. Laxmaiah (CDS) Shri. Narsimha
Rao (DRS), Dr. Rajan and Dr. Mohanchandran.
viii
The core team consisting of myself, Dr. C. Ravi and Mr. M. Venkatanarayana prepared
the report based on the background papers. We are grateful to Dr. Ravi and Mr.
Venkatanarayana for spending lot of time in preparing the APHDR. We also thank Prof.
Kanakalatha Mukund for editing the manuscript.
The progress of the report was monitored by a Steering Committee (chaired by Prof. C.
H. Hanumantha Rao) and Technical Committee (chaired by Prof. S. Subrahmanyam). We
thank Prof. C.H.Hanumatha Rao, Prof. K. L. Krishna, Prof. S. Subrahmanyam, Principal
Secretaries and Heads of Departments from Government of Andhra Pradesh for their help
and useful comments on the report.
Also we thank Mr. Vijay Kumar, Librarian (CESS) his colleagues for their help in locating
data and research material necessary for the report.
Shri Rosaiah garu, Hon’ble Minister for Finance and Planning has given full support
for the preparation of the report. Shri A.K. Goel, the Special Chief Secretary, Planning
Preface
Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh has been in constant touch with us by giving
useful comments and encouragement in preparing the report. Shri T. Koteswara Rao, former
director, Planning Department (GoAP) has been with the centre (CESS) while preparing the
APHDR and gave useful suggestions on the report. We thank all of them.
The report was prepared with the support of the Planning Commission, Government
of India. We wish to thank Shri B. N. Yungandhar, Member, Planning Commission, Dr.
Rohini Nayyar (former adviser) and Dr. Santosh Mehrotra (present adviser).
The UNDP, India country office has given full support in the preparation of the report.
The initial involvement of Prof. Seeta Prabhu, head of the Human Development Resource
Centre (HDRC) at UNDP proved to be very useful later in preparing the report. She gave a
lot of encouragement and support throughout the preparation of the report. We wish to
thank the UNDP Resident Representative Ms. Maxine Olson, Prof. Seeta Prabhu and Shri
Suraj Kumar.
This is the first human development report for the state of Andhra Pradesh. The process
of preparation of APHDR has been an enriching experience for the core team and others.
We hope the analysis and findings of the Report would be useful for improving human
development of Andhra Pradesh in future.
S. Mahendra Dev
Director, CESS
01-05-2008
ix
Contents
Messages iii
Preface vii
List of Tables, Figures & Box Items xiv
1. Introduction 1-10
1.1 Uniqueness of Andhra Pradesh 1
1.2 Background 4
1.3 Objectives 6
1.4 Novelty of the Report 7
1.5 Organisation Scheme of the Report 8
xi
6. Agrarian Economy 63-76
6.1 Changing Structure in Agrarian Economy 64
6.2 Land Reforms 65
6.3 Changes in Land and Water Resources 68
6.4 Performance of Agriculture 69
6.5 Decline in Public Sector Investment and Failure of Support Services 70
6.6 Agrarian Distress and Farmers Suicides 72
xii
11. Environment 145-156
11.1 Natural Resource Base 146
11.2 Status of Environmental Health 153
11.3 Environmental Index 155
References 252-257
xiii
List of Tables
xiv
6.2 Changes in Cropped and Irrigated Area in Andhra Pradesh, 1956-2005 66
6.3 Contribution of District to the Total Cropped and Irrigated Area declined in Andhra Pradesh 67
6.4 Growth Rate in Aggregate Value of Crop Output in Andhra Pradesh 69
6.5 Growth of Gross Fixed Capital Formation in Agriculture in Andhra Pradesh 71
6.6 Percentage of Farmers Investing in Borewells in Andhra Pradesh 72
6.7 Percentage of Investment lost due to failure of Borewells across Regions of Andhra Pradesh 72
7.1 Size, Growth and Composition of Population in Andhra Pradesh and India 78
7.2 Crude Birth and Death Rates, Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and Total Fertility Rate
(TFR) in Andhra Pradesh and India 79
7.3 Nutritional Status of Children and Women in Andhra Pradesh and India, 2005-06 86
8.1 Literacy Rate in Andhra Pradesh and India 96
8.2 Percentage of Households with no Literate Adult (All)/Adult Female in Andhra Pradesh,
Kerala and India 98
8.3 Percentage Distribution of Schools and Enrolment between Public (Govt.) and Private
Management in Andhra Pradesh, 1970-71 to 2004-05 104
8.4 Physical Access to School in Andhra Pradesh – Percentage of Population Living in the
Habitations which are Availing Schooling Facility, 1957-2002 104
8.5 Teacher-Pupil Ratio (TPR) in Public and Private Schools by the Type of the School in
Andhra Pradesh, 2006 107
8.6 Number of Schools Without Selected Facility in Andhra Pradesh, 2006 109
9.1 Educational Levels – Percentage of Persons with Level of Education in Andhra Pradesh
and India, 2004-05 114
9.2 Doctors Registered with Andhra Pradesh Medical Council, 2005 114
9.3 Work Participation Rate by Sex and Location in Andhra Pradesh and India 115
9.4 Distribution of Workers by Nature and Activity in Andhra Pradesh 115
9.5 Sex Ratio of Workers by Nature and Activity in Andhra Pradesh 116
9.6 Sex Ratio in Andhra Pradesh and India 117
9.7 Correlation Matrix 121
10.1 Percentage of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in Total Population in
Andhra Pradesh, 1961-2001 132
10.2 Literacy Levels by Caste and Gender in Andhra Pradesh 132
10.3 Percentage of Out-of-School Children (5-14 Age Group) across Social Groups in
Andhra Pradesh, 1981-2001 134
10.4 Health Parameters across Social Groups in Andhra Pradesh, 1998-99 135
10.5 Occupational Structure by Social Groups in Andhra Pradesh 136
10.6 Work Participation Rates across Social Groups in Andhra Pradesh 137
10.7 Distribution of Workforce between Agriculture and Non-Agriculture Activities across
Social Groups in Andhra Pradesh 138
10.8 Percentage of Population who Owned or Possessed any land or land cultivated across
Social Groups, Rural Andhra Pradesh 138
10.9 Number of Operational Holding and Area Operated across Social Groups in Andhra Pradesh 139
xv
10.10 Access to Basic Infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh: Percentage of Villages Predominantly
Inhabited by SCs and STs, having Selected Facility, 2001 140
10.11 Percentage of Households without Selected Basic Amenities in Andhra Pradesh, 2001 141
10.12 Incidence of Crime committed against SCs and STs in Andhra Pradesh and India, 2005 142
10.13 Share of SCP and TSP in Budget Allocation for Elemetnary Education and Child Welfare in
Andhra Pradesh, 2001-07 144
13.1 Trends in Urbanisation in Andhra Pradesh, 1961-2001 174
13.2 Concentration of Population in Urban Agglomeration (UAs) and Isolated Towns in
Andhra Pradesh, 1971-2001 174
13.3 Percent of Cities, Medium and Small Towns in the Total Towns and the Total Urban
Population in Andhra Pradesh, 1961-2001 175
13.4 Inter-District Urban In-Migrants to Hyderabad-Rangareddy Districts, 2001 184
Appendix Tables
A1.1 Goal Posts of HDI at State Level 199
A1.2 Goal Posts of HDI at District Level 200
A2.1 Human Development Indicators across Major States in India 205
A2.2 Growth of GSDP across Major States in India 206
A2.3 Growth of Per Capita GSDP across Major States in India 206
A2.4 Structural Transformation: Share of Agriculture in Employment and GSDP across
Major States in India, 2004-05 207
A2.5 State-wise Growth of Employment in India 207
A2.6 Percentage of Workforce in Non-Agricultural Activities across Major States in India 208
A2.7 Growth Rate of Unemployment and Real Wages across Major States in India 208
A2.8 Percentage of Indebted Farming Households By Source of Loan and Distribution of
Outstanding Loan by Source across Major States in India, 2003 209
A2.9 Sex Ratio at Birth and of the Children (0-4 age group) across Major States in India 209
A2.10 Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) across Major States in India 209
A2.11 Six States with High Prevalence of HIV/AIDS in India, 2005 210
A2.12 Number of Primary Health Centres, Sub-centres and Community Health Centres
functioning and availability of each facility per 10 lakh population, Rural India 2005 210
A2.13 Percent Distribution of Households according to Protein Energy Adequacy Status
across selected states in India 211
A2.14 Anthropometrical measures of women and children across Major States in India 211
A2.15 Percentage of Births Attended by Health Professional across Major States in India 212
A2.16 Percentage of Birth Delivered in Medical Institutions across Major States in India 212
A2.17 State-wise Progress of Mid-Day Meal Scheme in India, 2003-04 213
A2.18 Incidence of Cognizable Crimes against SC/STs and Crime Rate across Major States in India 213
xvi
A2.19 Crude Death Rate in Southern States in India 214
A2.20 Crude Birth Rate in Southern States in India 214
A2.21 Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in Southern States in India 214
A2.22 Trends in Total Fertility Rate (TFR) in Southern States in India 214
A2.23 Maternal Mortality Ratio in Southern States in India 214
A2.24 Maternal and Reproductive Health Situation in Southern States in India 214
A2.25 Family Planning Practices in Southern States of India 215
A2.26 Number per 1000 Households with no Literate Adult /Female Adults across
Social Groups in AP, Kerala and India 215
xvii
A3.21 District-wise Health Facility Availability per ten lakh population, 2004-05 234
A3.22 Literacy level across districts of Andhra Pradesh 235
A3.23 District-wise number of rural and partial urban mandals as per the specified levels
of female literacy rate in 2001 236
A3.24 District-wise percentage distribution of rural and partial urban mandals as per the
specified levels of female literacy rate in 2001 237
A3.25 District-wise distribution of the index of gender equality in literacy in rural and partial
urban mandals as per the specified levels of female literacy rate in 2001 237
A3.26 District-wise names of rural and partial urban mandals with female literacy rate less than
or equal to 30 per cent in 2001. 238-239
A3.27 Number of Non-literate per 1000 adults across social groups in Indian and
Andhra Pradesh, 193-94 to 2004-05 239
A3.28 District-wise literacy rate for the age group 15 years and above, 2001 240
A3.29 Percent of Children in the age group 6-14 years attending schools in Andhra Pradesh, 2001 240
A3.30 Ranking of the districts of Andhra Pradesh according to their Educational Attainment
Indices and Gender Disparity Indices in education, 2001 241
A3.31 Drop-out rate in Primary and Upper Primary stages in Andhra Pradesh, 1971-2006 241
A3.32 Drop-out rate in Primary and Upper Primary stage across districts of Andhra Pradesh, 2005 242
A3.33 Percent share of SC/ST in total population, growth of their population, urbanization
(percent of urban) and sex ratio among SC/STs across districts of Andhra Pradesh, 2001 243
A3.34 Literacy rate among SC/STs across districts of Andhra Pradesh, 2001 244
A3.35 Environmental Index across districts of Andhra Pradesh, 2001 245
A3.36 Urbanisation across districts of Andhra Pradesh, 1961-2001 246
A3.37 Number of Towns and Population by size class of the Towns, 1961-2001 247
A3.38 Percentage of Households without selected Basic Amenities across Districts
of Andhra Pradesh, 1991-2001 248
A3.39 Selected Child Development/Well-being and Gender Empowerment related Indicators across
Districts of Andhra Pradesh, 2001 249
xviii
List of Figures
xix
8.2 Growth of Enrolment in Andhra Pradesh 99
8.3 Percentage of Children Attending School by Age in Andhra Pradesh, 2001 100
8.4 Percentage of Children (6-14 Age Group) Attending School in Andhra Pradesh, 1991-2001 101
8.5 Educational Attainment Index across Major States in India, 2001 103
8.6 Educational Attainment Index across Districts of Andhra Pradesh, 2001 103
8.7 Percentage Share of Education Expenditure (Rev. A/c) in Total Expenditure (TE) and
GSDP and Per Capita Expenditure (1993-94 Prices) on Education in (PCEE)
Andhra Pradesh, 1960-2007 109
8.8 Per Capita Real Expenditure (1993-94 Prices) on Education in
Southern States, 1990-91 to 2004-05 110
8.9 Share of Elementary Education in the Total Expenditure on Education in
Andhra Pradesh, 1956-2008 110
9.1 Violence Against Women in Andhra Pradesh : Percentage in Private and Public Space
(in the Total) and Violence Rate (No. of Cases per lakh women) 118
9.2 Domestic Violence across Major Indian States: Percentage of Ever-Married Women
who have experienced spousal violence, 2005-06 118
9.3 Percentage of Population by Age Group Living in Below Poverty Line (BPL) Households
in Andhra Pradesh 120
9.4 Gender and Child Development and Gender Empowerment Measure Index
across Districts of Andhra Pradesh, 2001 121
10.1 Percentage of Children (5-14 Age Group) Attending School by Caste, 2004-05 134
10.2 Percentage Distribution of Size Class of Holdings across Social Groups in
Andhra Pradesh, 2005-06 139
10.3 Mean Consumption Expenditure across Social Groups in Andhra Pradesh 140
10.4 Head Count Ratio of Poverty across Social Groups in Andhra Pradesh 140
11.1 Environmental Index across Districts of Andhra Pradesh 155
13.1 Age Distribution of Migrants in Urban Andhra Pradesh, 2001 177
13.2 Percentage Distribution of Migrants in Andhra Pradesh by Reason in each
Stream of Migration, 2001 177
13.3 Work Participation Rate in Urban Sector of Andhra Pradesh and India 178
13.4 Percentage Distribution of Urban Workers by Industry Category in Andhra Pradesh and India 178
13.5 Share of Urban to Total Workers in each Industry Category in Andhra Pradesh 178
13.6 Percentage Distribution of Urban Population by Education Levels in Andhra Pradesh 180
13.7 Distribution of Migrants in Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration (HUA) by Reason, 2001 184
xx
List of Box Items
Box Title Page
No.
xxi
CHAPTER I
1 Introduction
Uniqueness and Background of AP
Introduction 1
A unique feature of Andhra Pradesh is the development change taking place in A.P. relates to women’s
of participatory institutions. The state is well-known for empowerment (social and economic) through self-help
its strong emphasis on rural development, community groups. The government of Andhra Pradesh is implementing
empowerment and support for women’s groups. These a statewide rural poverty eradication programme based
include self-help women’s groups, water user associations, on social mobilization and empowerment of rural poor
watershed committees, school education committees, women. This programme is popularly known as ‘Velugu’
mother’s committees, Rytu Mitra Groups (farmers’ clubs), or Indira Kranthi Pathakam(IKP). This project aims at
vana samrakshana samitis (VSS, Joint Forest Management). enhancing assets, capabilities and the ability of the poor
For example, Andhra Pradesh was the first state in the to deal with shocks and risks. The programme has
country to enact the Andhra Pradesh Farmers Management contributed to the improvement in women’s empowerment
of Irrigation Systems Act, 1997, under which the formation at the household and community level. There are already
of Water Users Associations (WUAs) became mandatory seven lakh self-help groups in the State. The present
for the management of irrigation. This is designed to bring government has introduced a programme called
greater accountability to the irrigation department as well INDIRAMMA (Integrated Novel Development in Rural
as a sense of ownership of the management systems among Areas and Model Municipal Areas) in 2006 for the
farmers. Similarly, A.P. has taken bold steps to demonstrate development of model villages and towns on saturation
that a convergence of conservation and development basis to provide basic infrastructure along with welfare
objectives can be achieved through Joint Forest Management measures in an integrated and focused manner and to be
(JFM). The JFM committees in Andhra Pradesh have serviced over a period of three years1 . Pensions, housing
successfully targeted remote and under-served and land distribution are some of the important measures
communities, in particular tribal populations. However, undertaken by the government to help the poor.
there have been, tensions between these participatory
The experience of AP on the demographic front is
institutions and Panchayati Raj institutions (PRIs). The
also distinctive. The state registered the fastest reduction
experience of Andhra Pradesh with respect to representative
in population growth in the country in the 1990s. It is
discussed in development literature.
interesting that the experience of fertility reduction in A.P.
The state has also made remarkable progress in is contrary to conventional theories and beliefs which hold
technical education like engineering and medicine, that fertility reduction is possible only with considerable
probably as a result of the importance given to mathematics economic or social development. The experience of Kerala
and science in colleges which might have improved the indicates that female education and improvement in health
skills of the students in these fields. One can see many (e.g. reduction in infant mortality) were responsible for
students from A.P. in IITs and medical colleges of the the decline in fertility levels. In A.P., female illiteracy and
country. The success of the IT revolution in the state and infant mortality are relatively high but fertility decline has
the number of professionally qualified persons from the been faster. The success of the state in controlling the
state working in other countries (e.g. Silicon Valley in population partly lies in better administration of programmes
the USA) testifies to the progress of the state in technical related both to family planning and welfare, including
education. the setting up of women’s self-help groups.
The state is also known for innovative poverty 1
According to predetermined saturation criteria, the activities to be covered
alleviation strategies. In the 1980s the government are: (1) housing; (2) drinking water supply; (3) sanitation – individual sanitary
latrine and drainage system; (4) link roads; (5) power connections – habitations
concentrated more on welfare schemes. The scheme to
and households; (6) health services including awareness and prevention; (7)
supply rice at ‘Two Rupees a Kilo’ through the public ICDS (nutrition and pre-primary education for children); (8) primary education;
distribution system (PDS) was one of the important schemes (9) pensions – old age pensions including pensions for weavers, widows and
introduced in this period. An important aspect of social disabled persons; (10) INDIRAMMA Cheruvu.
Introduction 3
The evidence shows that India lost 1 per cent of GDP The outcomes particularly on agriculture, health and
due to tax reforms in the post-reform period. Central education are determined more by the policies of the state
transfers to state governments also declined. State government. As will be shown in the subsequent chapters
governments were forced to borrow in the market and of the report, economic growth has been taking place in
other (often international) sources at high interest rates. Andhra Pradesh. The growth rate of GSDP in the last four
As a result, the levels of debt and debt servicing increased years has been 7 to 8 per cent per annum. The state has
in most of the states. In recent years, most state governments also been successful in reducing income poverty if we go
were in fiscal crisis and did not have funds for capital by official statistics. However, A.P. has not well done in
expenditures. This is especially important since state terms of ‘inclusive’ development. There is a need for
governments are responsible for critical areas such as significant improvements in agriculture, employment, social
rural infrastructure, power, water supply, health and sector and reduction of regional and other disparities. The
education. Meanwhile, at the central government level, post-reform period has witnessed an increase in disparities
capital expenditure declined as a share of national income, across regions and social groups and between rural and
and all public expenditure directed towards the rural areas urban areas. The outcomes for A.P. indicate that the efforts
fell both as a per cent of GDP and in real per capita of different governments in the state have not been enough
terms. The composition of government spending can alter to improve human development and livelihoods and that
relative prices and factor income and this in turn will there is a need to promote broad-based and inclusive growth
affect income distribution and employment. In recent years, to benefit all sections of society.
there have been signs of increase in tax/GDP ratios due 1.2 Background and Comparative Status
to better enforcement and tax collection. This could improve
allocations to infrastructure and the social sectors. Andhra Pradesh is one of the major states in India
and ranks fifth in terms of population. The population of
Trade liberalization is expected to improve exports the state was about 75.7 million in 2001 (Census 2001).
which can generate employment. However, this depends The projected population would be around 83 million in
on whether the impact percolates to unskilled workers or March 2007 accounting for 7.4 per cent of country’s
stays with skilled workers. If only the IT sector benefits, population. In terms of population the state is bigger than
the overall employment prospects are not bright. The many countries in the world. Its geographical spread of
evidence seems to suggest that employment in the organized 274.4 lakh hectares accounting for 8.37 per cent of the
manufacturing sector has not improved. Employment has total area of the country makes it the fourth largest state in
increased only in the unorganized sector which does not the country. The state capital Hyderabad has become an
point to an improvement in the quality of employment. A1 city in 2007 with 54 lakh population. There are 23
Financial sector liberalisation in developing countries has districts and 1128 Mandals in the state. Andhra Pradesh
been associated with measures that are designed to make has three regions which are distinct in terms of socio-
the Central Bank more independent, relieve financial economic characteristics owing to historical reasons and
constraints by freeing interest rates and allowing financial region specific resource base. Of the 23 districts, nine
innovation, reduce directed and subsidised credit, as well are in Coastal Andhra; ten are in Telangana and four in
as allow greater freedom in terms of external flows of capital Rayalaseema.
in various forms. However, financial liberalization has led
Viewed against the resource base and economic
to a decline in credit to the agriculture sector, small and
activities, the relative performance of Andhra Pradesh among
marginal farmers and weaker sections in the post-reform
Indian states in terms of the growth of SDP and per capita
period. Thus, on balance the mix of macro policies have
income seems to have improved during the 1980s. A
not promoted employment and human development in
higher rate of growth of SDP and per capita income began
the post-reform period.
in the state from the late 1970s, while the 1980s was the
Introduction 5
refinery and steel plant in Visakhapatnam. The backward and Anantapur in Rayalaseema are among the poorest
and forward linkages generated by these large-scale units districts in the state. In general, South Telangana districts,
were expected to attract private investment from the some districts of Rayalaseema and north Coastal Andhra
surpluses of the agricultural sector. While in the 1980s are poorer than South Coastal Andhra and North Telangana.
some entrepreneurship emerged from agricultural surpluses, To conclude, historically, in terms of economic and
private investment is still flowing to the services sector. social development, Andhra Pradesh was behind
At present the government is focusing on key sectors like Travancore and Mysore states, but was ahead of Madhya
pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, food processing, Pradesh and other poorer states. The same situation
chemicals, marine, leather, textiles, IT and communications. continues to some extent even today fifty years after the
The service sector is the major centre of growth in the formation of the state. In terms of economic growth and
non-agricultural sector in the state. More recently, per capita income it is now closer to all-India average.
information technology (IT), a component of the service However, in terms of human development indicators and
sector, has been the fastest growing sector in Andhra employment growth, the state is lagging behind all-India.
Pradesh. In short, the state has to concentrate more on ‘inclusive
The performance of the social sector in A.P. has not growth’ or equitable development.
been satisfactory as compared to many states in India, 1.3 Objectives
particularly the other southern states like Kerala and Tamil
Nadu. The state has, however, done well in terms of income It is believed that development means the capacity
poverty. Official estimates show that poverty was only around of a society to participate and enable the people to have a
15 percent in the year 2004-05. This level of poverty is vision of their future. Therefore, this report should be used
one of the lowest in the country. The state has also done to launch a public debate on the development pattern of
remarkably well in reducing population growth. Further, the state in future. It is necessary to keep in mind two
aspects while preparing the HDR: the process and the
as noted above, the women’s self-help group movement
substance. In terms of the process it (the report) should be
with seven lakh groups is also a success in the state. On
more participatory in nature with participation of civil society,
the other hand, the human development index is low and
public scrutiny, involvement of political leadership, broad-
the state ranks tenth among 15 states. In spite of better
based public dissemination of information required at the
economic growth, the state is lagging behind in social
preparation stage. In terms of substance, the goal and purpose
development. The performance of the state in education
of the report are important. The goal must be to facilitate
had been very good in the 1990s. Despite this the literacy
wide-ranging public debate on what would be the reaction
level in the state is one of the lowest in the country. Similarly,
of people to the changing global situation.
it ranks eleventh among 17 states in infant mortality. The
low poverty ratios and the high incidence of child labour/ The APHDR aims at drawing attention to issues
educational deprivation of children indicate a paradoxical pertaining to human development by reviewing the progress
situation specific to the state. It has the highest incidence made on aspects related to the quality of life. It identifies
of child labour among the Indian states whereas it has the strengths, gaps and deficiencies in order to suggest specific
lowest level of poverty and poverty levels have also declined policy interventions. The APHDR is a programming tool
sharply in the past decade. The infrastructure index shows and a monitoring instrument for interventions and an
that the state is lacking in infrastructure and in fact has the advocacy device for raising resources to invest in the people
lowest status (CMIE, 2000). so that the quality of people’s lives can be enhanced. It
presents the status in different sectors which ultimately
Inter-regional disparities are very high in the state.
have a bearing upon human development and thereby
Districts like Mahabubnagar and Adilabad in Telangana,
facilitates the realization of a vision for the future. APHDR
Vizianagaram and Srikakulam in North Coastal Andhra
Introduction 7
it also highlights the impact of interventions and policy 1.5 Organisation of the Report
changes initiated during the 1990s on welfare. The Andhra Pradesh Human Development Reoprt
(5) The APHDR has made an attempt to take a novel is organized as follows. Chapter 2 presents the human
approach on the issues discussed and problems addressed. development indices across districts of Andhra Pradesh.
An attempt is made to assess progress in the context of the As a backdrop to the report, Chapter 3 presents the history
state as it was the first Indian state to carry out serious of social movements in the state. There have been many
economic reforms, to take policy initiatives in view of social movements relating to land issues, tribals, dalits,
good governance and hosting a number of Non- women and regional issues. This chapter examines the
Governmental Organisation (NGOs) involved in importance of these movements in making modern Andhra
developmental activities. As noted above, since the late Pradesh.
1980s, micro-financing institutions have been promoted Chapter 4 provides an overview of the economic
through self-help groups (SHGs) which are expected to and social development experience of the state. The
result in empowerment of the poor especially of women. performance of the state including the problems and the
An assessment of the turnaround in the economy; the prospects of development at the macro level is analyzed
policy initiatives; participation of people and civil society in this chapter. It focuses on economic growth, infrastructure,
and their impact on the welfare of the people are interesting poverty, inequality, fiscal performance and social sector
parts of the report. expenditures.
(6) For the first time, a discussion on social movements Expanding productive employment and livelihoods
is included as a separate chapter in a human development is central for sustained poverty reduction and for enhancing
report. This is important because social movements help
human development as labour is the main asset for the
to improve human development and also lead to greater
majority of the poor. Liberalisation measures are likely to
sensitization of the rights approach and better governance.
have significant implications for employment and the labour
Another novel feature of the report is a detailed analysis
market. How these policies have affected the growth and
on women’s empowerment and child well-being. It is
structure of employment is an issue that has important
known that regional disparities act as barriers in achieving
implications for future policies. In this context, Chapter 5
the goals of human development. Therefore, an attempt
looks at trends in employment, wages and rural livelihoods.
is made in the report to assess and analyse the contribution
It covers issues relating to employment in quantitative and
of women’s empowerment to reducing regional and gender
qualitative terms. This chapter also examines the experience
disparities in human development in A.P. It also constructs
of livelihood promotions at the grass root level.
a gender development index and child development index
at the district level. The report for the first time also constructs Higher growth in agriculture is considered an important
an environmental index. element of inclusive growth as a majority of livelihoods
depend on the performance of this sector. Agriculture plays
In brief, apart from studying areas like health,
a pivotal role in the economy of A.P. Chapter 6 examines
education, livelihood issues, social problems and the per
the changes in structure, performance of agriculture and
capita Gross Domestic Product, the APHDR would be
the issues relating to farmers’ suicides. This chapter also
unique in looking at disparities across districts, the grass
discusses the policy issues relating to agriculture in the
root level institutions and their impact on human
present context and suggests the strategies needed for higher
development. The APHDR also focuses on state-specific
growth in agriculture.
issues like farmers’ suicides, child labour, HIV/AIDS, self-
help groups and the evolution of institutions parallel to There is no difference of opinion that A.P. has
Panchayat Raj systems. experienced rapid demographic transition. However, health
Introduction 9
ANDHRA PRADESH
Adilabad
Vizianagaram Srikakulam
Nizamabad Karimnagar
Warangal Visakhapatnam
Medak
Khammam
East
Ranga Reddy Hyderabad Godavari
Nalgonda West
Godavari
Krishna
Mahabubnagar
Guntur
Kurnool Prakasam
Anantapur
Cuddapah Nellore
Chittoor
2.1 Introduction
he accepted notion of what constitutes
Human Development 11
The single goal of the human development approach Pradesh through simple composite indices such as human
is to put people, ignored so far, back at the center of the development index (HDI), human poverty index (HPI)
development process with their involvement and and gender development and empowerment index (GDI
participation in terms of economic debate, policy and and GEM).
advocacy. The goal is massive but simple; the aim is to
assess the level of long-term well-being of the people 2.2 Human Development Index
and to bring about development of the people, by the The human development index is a simple composite
people and for the people. measure that gauges the overall status of a region in terms
The United Nations Development Programme of three basic dimensions - long and healthy life, knowledge
(UNDP) initiated the process and first brought out a Human and decent standard of living - of human development.
Development Report in 1990 in which the status of human According to UNDP methodology, literacy rate, enrolment
development of a country/region was indicated4 . The rate, life expectancy and per capita GNP are the
UNDP has also urged individual nation states to bring representative indicators for these basic dimensions.
out human development reports at the national level, across
AP in All-India Context
sub-regions within the country, for instance states in India,
within the states across districts or sub-regions (i.e. cluster The Planning Commission of India considered the
of districts based on specific criteria of homogeneity). following indicators for three dimensions of HDI in NHDR:
Consequently, there are a number of countries, both literacy rate (7+ years of age) and adjusted intensity of
developed and developing, that have prepared HDRs at formal education for education, life expectancy at age
the national levels5 . one and infant mortality rate (IMR) for health, and
The Planning Commission of India prepared and consumption expenditure (per capita per month) for
published the first HDR of India in 2001 in which all the command over resources (NHDR, 2001).
Indian states are ranked in the order of their achievement According to NHDR 2001, the performance of Andhra
in terms of the indicators that reflect human development. Pradesh appears to be lagging among the 15 major Indian
Thereafter the Planning Commission has also been states (See Table 2.1). Though the state improved the level
encouraging state governments to produce their own of human development over the period, its relative position
Human Development Reports. In fact, Madhya Pradesh slipped as the other backward states began to perform
was the first state in India to produce a HDR long before better, especially in the 1990s. The HDI value of AP
the Planning Commission. The other Indian states6 have increased from 0.298 in 1981 to 0.377 in 1991 and further
come out with their state level reports, one by one. As
to 0.416, but the rank of the state was 9 in 1981 and
mentioned before, the Andhra Pradesh Human
1991 and 10 in 2001. The HDI value in the state has
Development Report (APHDR) is one of these state level
been consistently lower than the all-India average and
human development reports.
the other south Indian states. When compared to BiMaRU7
Against this background, this chapter compares the states, the state was ahead in the 1980s but in the 1990s
levels of human development across districts in Andhra the state was lagging behind Rajasthan, which was one
4
It, in fact, indicates the relative status of the country/region in question in the among the poorer states in India.
set of countries/regions.
5
Based on the analysis of development radar, the
The UNDP supports the HDRs of nation states at many levels: funding,
technical assistance, setting the methodology, publication etc. After National comment of NHDR on Andhra Pradesh was that “on the
Human Development Report (NHDR) units were set up, it has developed a whole, the attainment on the indicators seems reasonably
series of tools to contribute to excellence in sub-national, national and regional
HDRs.
balanced, though the attainment levels are less than half
6
So far reports have been prepared by the states of Punjab, Maharashtra,
the norms for most indicators even in the early 1990s”
Tamilnadu, Kerala, West Bengal, Gujarat, Orissa, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Himachal (NHDR, 2001: 16).
Pradesh, Assam and Nagaland. Recently Uttar Pradesh and Tripura joined in
7
the list. The term refers to Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh.
Human Development 13
indices). We refer to the early 1990s as period I and early Mahabubnagar) are in Telangana, three (Kadapa, Kurnool,
years of this decade as period II. Anantapur) in Rayalaseema and three (Srikakulam,
Vizianagaram and Prakasam) in North and South Coastal
There are significant inter-district disparities in the
Andhra.
index values. The values across districts vary from 0.717
in Hyderabad to 0.397 in Mahaboobnagar in period II In most districts of South Coastal Andhra the index
(See Table 2.3). A comparison of levels in the early years of human development was higher than the state average.
of this decade (period II) shows that 11 districts had lower In Telangana, districts like Hyderabad, Rangareddy,
levels of human development as compared to the index Karimnagar, Khammam and Medak had higher levels of
value for the state of 0.537 (Table 2.3). Out of these, five
human development than the state average.
districts (Warangal, Nizamabad, Adilabad, Nalgonda and
Table 2.3: Human Development Index and Ranking of Districts
(Period I: Early 1990s and Period II: Early years of this decade)
Table 2.3a: Human Development Index and Rank Table 2.3b: Districts Arranged by Rank
Index Value Rank Period I Period II
Sno Districts
Period I Period II Period I Period II Rank District Rank District
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4
1 Srikakulam 0.269 0.453 21 21 1 Hyderabad 1 Hyderabad
2 Vizianagaram 0.236 0.402 23 22 2 Krishna 2 Krishna
3 Visakhapatnam 0.383 0.553 15 11 3 Guntur 3 Ranga Reddy
4 East Godavari 0.411 0.586 11 6 4 Nellore 4 West Godavari
5 West Godavari 0.448 0.607 7 4 5 Ranga Reddy 5 Guntur
6 Krishna 0.510 0.623 2 2 6 Chittoor 6 East Godavari
7 Guntur 0.490 0.599 3 5 7 West Godavari 7 Karimnagar
8 Prakasam 0.409 0.532 12 14 8 Karimnagar 8 Nellore
9 Nellore 0.452 0.565 4 8
9 Kadapah 9 Khammam
10 Chittoor 0.451 0.558 6 10
10 Khammam 10 Chittoor
11 Kadapa 0.447 0.536 9 13
11 East Godavari 11 Visakhapatnam
12 Anantapur 0.343 0.458 19 20
12 Prakasam 12 Medak
13 Kurnool 0.327 0.473 20 19
Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh
14 Mahabubnagar 0.249 0.397 22 23
13 Medak 13 Kadapa
15 Ranga Reddy 0.452 0.610 5 3
14 Nizamabad 14 Prakasam
16 Hyderabad 0.591 0.717 1 1
15 Visakhapatnam 15 Warangal
17 Medak 0.385 0.550 13 12
16 Adilabad 16 Nizamabad
18 Nizamabad 0.383 0.504 14 16
17 Nalgonda 17 Adilabad
19 Adilabad 0.361 0.488 16 17
20 Karimnagar 0.448 0.573 8 7 18 Warangal 18 Nalgonda
21 Warangal 0.349 0.514 18 15 19 Anantapur 19 Kurnool
22 Khammam 0.420 0.559 10 9 20 Kurnool 20 Anantapur
23 Nalgonda 0.360 0.481 17 18 21 Srikakulam 21 Srikakulam
Andhra Pradesh 0.402 0.537 22 Mahabubnagar 22 Vizianagaram
CV 20.98 13.89 23 Vizianagaram 23 Mahabubnagar
Figure 2.1: Rate (%) of Change during 1991-2001 in HDI 2.3 Human Poverty Index
Vizianagaram While the HDI measures the overall progress in
Srikakulam achieving human development, the HPI measures the
Mahabubnagar
Warangal distribution of progress through the level of deprivation.
Kurnool The broad dimension by which this deprivation is
Visakhapatnam
Medak measured is the same as those of HDI – health, knowledge
East Godavari and standard of living – but there is a slight variation in
West Godavari
Adilabad the indicators. Moreover the level of deprivation is the
Ranga Reddy yardstick for measurement while achievement levels are
Nalgonda
AP State considered for HDI. Therefore, the indicators taken are
Anantapur as follows: adult illiteracy rate and percentage of children
Khammam
Nizamabad
(6-14 age) not attending school for education; infant
Prakasam mortality rate for health; and percentage of household
Karimnagar
Nellore
not having access to basic amenities like drinking water,
Chittoor housing, sanitation, cooking fuel and electricity for
Guntur
Krishna
command over resources (see Technical Note for details
Hyderabad in the Appendix).
Kadapa
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 The human poverty index is constructed for two
The components of human development index show points of time - 1991 and 2001 - to trace the decline in
that there is no correlation between income and health / the level of deprivation. It indicates that between 1991
education for some of the districts. The rank in terms of and 2001 the deprivation levels were brought down across
per capita income is much higher than the rank for all the districts. Importantly, the rate of decline during
education and health for three districts viz, Visakhapatnam, 1991-2001 in the level of deprivation was higher in those
Medak and Khammam. On the other hand, the rank for districts where levels of deprivation were relatively higher
Human Development 15
Table 2.4 : Human Poverty Index (HPI) across Districts of Andhra Pradesh in 1991. But Mahabubnagar was an
exception and this was one backward
HPI Rank
Sno District district with the lowest rate of change
1991 2001 % Change 1991 2001 Change
during the period.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
However, the relative position of
1 Srikakulam 0.729 0.566 22.4 22 21 5
many districts did not change. The three
2 Vizianagaram 0.766 0.597 22.0 23 23 6
most backward districts and relatively
3 Visakhapatnam 0.620 0.504 18.7 15 17 18
the most deprived ones were
4 East Godavari 0.587 0.465 20.8 9 9 12
Vizianagaram, Srikakulam and Maha-
5 West Godavari 0.548 0.449 18.2 4 5 19 bubnagar. Hyderabad, Ranga reddy,
6 Krishna 0.518 0.399 22.9 3 3 4 Krishna and Guntur were districts that
7 Guntur 0.561 0.428 23.7 5 4 2 were the least deprived. The value of
8 Prakasam 0.630 0.494 21.5 17 13 8 coefficient of variation (CV) indicates
9 Nellore 0.592 0.466 22.1 10 10 10 that there was a slight reduction in
10 Chittoor 0.570 0.461 19.1 6 8 16 regional variation across districts in
11 Kadapa 0.575 0.451 21.6 7 6 7 terms of deprivation during 1991-2001.
12 Anantapur 0.636 0.515 19.1 18 20 17
2.4 Gender Development (GDI)
13 Kurnool 0.648 0.494 23.7 19 14 3
and Empowerment Measure Index
14 Mahabubnagar 0.712 0.592 16.9 21 22 22
(GEMI)
15 Rangareddy 0.494 0.369 25.3 2 2 1
16 Hyderabad 0.233 0.213 8.3 1 1 23
The gender-related development
index (GDI) is the third important index
17 Medak 0.620 0.498 19.7 16 15 15
in the series used by the UNDP. It
18 Nizamabad 0.592 0.470 20.6 11 11 13
measures achievements in the same
19 Adilabad 0.650 0.514 20.9 20 19 11
dimension and uses the same variables
20 Karimnagar 0.575 0.452 21.4 8 7 9
as the HDI does, but takes into account
21 Warangal 0.615 0.492 20.0 13 12 14
the inequality in achievement between
22 Khammam 0.604 0.500 17.2 12 16 20
women and men. The greater the gender
23 Nalgonda 0.619 0.513 17.1 14 18 21
disparity in basic human development,
Andhra Pradesh 0.583 0.469 19.5 the lower is the GDI of a region when
CV 17.0 16.5 16.9 compared with its HDI.
Note : CV – Coefficient of Variation.
The UNDP also introduced another indicator i.e.
Source : Computed, see Technical note for details.
Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) which indicates
whether women are able to participate actively in economic
and political life. It measures gender inequality in key
areas of economic and political participation and decision-
making. The GEM, in theory, focuses on women’s
opportunities in economic and political arenas and in
this it differs from the GDI. However, for this report the
GEM index is constructed using three additional indicators
to those of GDI. These three additional indicators are:
percentage of women representatives elected in local body
elections, rate of violence against women and sex ratio
of children (CSR).
9
This index indicates that the relative disadvantage for women is lower when
the value of index is higher and vice versa. Women, in general, are disadvantaged
when compared to men so that one can compare the relative level of disadvantage
for women across districts.
Human Development 17
region. The GEM index indicates that women living in more backward in terms of GEM. Incidentally, many of
these districts are relatively better in terms of empowerment. these districts are located in Telangana region.
Mahabub-nagar followed by Warangal, Nalgonda, Kurnool
It is worth noting that Hyderabad district which had
and Adilabad were the districts which were relatively
the best values in HDI, HPI and GDI was ranked only
16th among 23 districts in GEMI, indicating that it is one
of the districts where women are at greater disadvantage.
The disadvantage for women in Hyderabad district is
influenced by the high violence rate against women and
low child sex ratio. This indicates that though the process
of urbanization has a positive impact on overall human
development, it has its own disadvantages in terms of
the well-being of women.
2.5. Conclusion
Two major conclusions can be drawn from the
analysis in this chapter. One is that there has been significant
improvement in human development of Andhra Pradesh.
But the relative performance of the state remained stagnant
as shown by its ranking in human development across
states. Second, there seems to be some convergence across
districts in human development in Andhra Pradesh,
indicating that the more backward districts are catching
up with the developed districts. On the other hand, regional
disparities have not changed much for human poverty
index and gender development index.
During the 1990s economic reforms were implemented In the era of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation
in Andhra Pradesh. Social movements led by political (LPG), the state is facilitating the movement of private
parties or otherwise have taken a different form, and became capital into agriculture and in a way it has also taken
over farmers’ movements by organizing them into Rytu
more sporadic, fractured and fragmented. Social movements
Mitra groups. However the inadequacies in strengthening
also might have contributed to change in the political
these institutions raise doubts about their sustainability.
regime in the state in 2004. There were agitations against
the effects of neo-liberal policies (hike in power and water Land for the tenants and landless to improve their
tariffs) headed by the left parties. The major outcome of livelihoods has been the main agenda of peasant movements.
the regime change is that agriculture has become important The government of India declared over 73 lakh acres as
in the development agenda. surplus land at the all-India level. But only 87.40 percent
of this land was taken possession of. Of this land, only
Class movements for structural change on issues of
68.80 percent was distributed (National Commission for
land distribution for the poor by the left and radical left SC and ST, 1993-94). In Andhra Pradesh, 8.18 lakh acres
parties have continued, but have not been a sustained were declared as surplus, of which 6.46 lakh acres (79
struggle. The state has also been implementing ‘third percent) has been taken into possession. Of this 6.46
generation land reforms’ giving land to the dalits and lakh acres 5.82 lakh acres (90 percent) have been distributed.
also to women under the Indira Kranthi Patham. Farmers Much of the land distributed is uncultivable, because
have been protesting on issues of input and output markets. landlords managed to hand over to the government the
Non-remunerative prices for agricultural produce, least cultivable land, which the law itself permitted; and
malfunctioning of markets and absence of government in many cases even this distribution took place merely
regulation are the issues which have resulted in sporadic on paper. The SCs got only 22 per cent of the total
agitations by farmers. Sometimes these are headed by government land distributed. Moreover about one lakh
political parties also. On the other hand, though the SCs lost ownership during 1961 to 1991 (Government
negotiations between the state and the extreme left parties of Andhra Pradesh, 2006). In the case of tribals the reality
failed recently, the state co-opted the agenda of the left is that out of the 72,000 cases decided under the LTR till
parties giving top priority to land distribution and constituted September 30, 2005, about 50 percent of the cases were
32
The non-party formations adhered to a concept of a unified peasantry, 34
The present government constituted a Land Committee in 2004 under the
undivided by internal antagonisms, and were thus opposed to differences
chairmanship of Koneru Ranga Rao, a Minister ‘to assess the overall implementation
based on caste, ethnicity, community, and religion (State of the Indian Farmer,
of land distribution programmes of the government and suggest measures for
Volume 23, 2004).
its more effective implementation’. This commission was appointed after the
33
Earlier the power charges were according to unit price. government held ‘Peace Talks’ with the radical left parties.
45
Central University in Hyderabad and Regional Engineering College (REC)
44
See NSSO Report No.516 on “Employment and unemployment situation which is renamed as National Institute of Technology (NIT) at Warangal were
among social groups in India, 2004-05”. some institutions established in 1970 as an outcome.
Table 4.1: Trend Rate of Growth in GSDP and Per Average per capita GSDP has increased from Rs. 4422
Capita GSDP: AP and All-India (decadal average) in the 1960s to Rs. 8865 in the 1990s.
AP India Recent estimates show that it has further increased to
Year
GSDP Per Capita GDP Per Capita
Rs. 12804 during 2001-06 (Table 4.2). Though per capita
1 2 3 4 5
income in the state has always been lower than the all-
1960-61 to 1970-71 2.11 0.26 3.43 1.23
India average, the ratio of A.P. to all-India per capita net
1970-71 to 1980-81 3.02 0.94 3.38 1.12
SDP rose from 95.7 per cent in the triennium 1993-96 to
1980-81 to 1990-91 5.21 3.04 5.37 3.24
1990-91 to 2000-01 5.42 4.01 5.94 3.98 99.3 per cent in 2002-05. The level of per capita GSDP
2000-01 to 2004-05 5.89 4.83 6.08 4.37 in Andhra Pradesh is now almost equal to the all-India
1983-84 to 1993-94 5.93 3.85 5.23 3.14 average (Figure 4.1). Thus, A.P. seems to have caught up
1993-94 to 2003-04 5.66 4.46 5.83 3.98 with all-India in per capita income in recent years. The
Note : At constant (1993-94) prices. Table 4.2: Decadal Averages of Per Capita GSDP in AP and India
Source : New Series (1993-94) GSDP, Directorate of Economics and Statistics Period AP India Ratio (AP/India)
(DES), Hyderabad
1 2 3 4
1960s 4422 4965 89.1
1
The GSDP figures used were supplied by the Directorate of Economics and 1970s 4904 5575 88.0
Statistics of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Whole series of data from 1960 to 1980s 6160 6788 90.7
the latest has been transformed into latest single base year: i.e. 1993-94 1990s 8865 9587 92.5
prices. While bringing GSDP figures at Constant prices with different base 2001-06 12804 13058 98.1
years into a single one, splicing method is used at the disaggregated level (i.e.
Splicing is done for each individual sector). All this is done by DES, Hyderbad Note : Averages of decades in Constant (1993-94) prices.
and supplied the final data. Source : Computed based on the DES Figures.
Per cent
35
partly due to lower population growth in A.P. than all- 30
India. 25
20
In comparison with other states, Andhra Pradesh 15
was one of the top performing states in terms of GSDP
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1999-2000
2000-1
2001-2
2002-3
2003-4
2004-5
2005-6
growth in the 1980s. Only three states viz., Rajasthan,
Haryana, and Maharashtra showed higher growth than declining continuously (from 45 per cent in 1980-81 to
Andhra Pradesh in the 1980s. However, in the 1990s, 24 per cent in 2004-05), there has been a corresponding
A.P. was ranked eighth in terms of GSDP growth. Apart increase in both the secondary (19 to 25 per cent) and
from the above three states, Gujarat, Karnataka, Tamil tertiary (35 to 50 per cent) sectors, though the growth of
Nadu and West Bengal had a higher rate of growth than the latter is much higher (Figure 4.2).
Figure 4.1: Per Capita GSDP in AP and India The growth rate of GSDP across the sectors indicates that
and the Ratio of AP in All India the primary sector registered the lowest rate of growth in
Andhra Pradesh (Table 4.3). However, the primary sector
120.0
16000 had its highest ever rate of growth (3.32 per cent) in the
14000 100.0 1990s. The tertiary sector registered the highest growth
12000 rate during the 1980s and in the recent past but in the
Per Capita (Rs.)
80.0
1990s the secondary sector (6.76 per cent) had grown at
Ratio (%)
10000
8000 60.0
ensure broad-based participation by all sections of society3. richest four districts has declined between 1993-94 and
However, the actual performance of the economy indicates 2003-04. The ratio of the four poorest districts (Srikakulam,
that the response of the state government to this challenge Warangal, Mahabubnagar and Vizianagaram) to the four
has not been very satisfactory. richest districts (Ranga Reddy, Medak, Nellore and Krishna)
increased from 57.4 per cent in 1993-94 to 65.5 percent
Even after fifty years, regional disparities in economic
in 2003-04.
and social development are significant in A.P. A comparison
of growth rates4 of district domestic product (DDP) and
Figure 4.3: Per Capita GDDP and its Rate of Growth
per capita DDP shows that seven districts of Telangana
across Districts of Andhra Pradesh
(Ranga Reddy, Nizamabad, Khammam, Hyderabad,
Mahabubnagar, Warangal and Medak) and two districts 1993-94 2004-05
30000 Growth 7.0
of North Coastal Andhra (Visakhapatnam and Srikakulam)
Per Capita DDP (Rs.)
Growth (%)
25000 6.0
have had higher growth rates than the state average. On 20000 5.0
4.0
15000
the other hand, all the districts in South Coastal Andhra 3.0
10000
2.0
and Rayalaseema and three districts of Telangana and 5000 1.0
one district of North Coastal Andhra have had a lower 0 0.0
East Godavari
Nalgonda
West Godavari
Krishna
Guntur
Prakasam
Nellore
kadapa
Ananthapur
Mahabubnagar
Ranga Reddy
Hyderabad
Chittoor
Adilabad
Andhra Pradesh
Kurnool
Srikakulam
Vizianagaram
Visakhapatnam
Medak
Nizamabad
Karimnagar
Warangal
Khammam
growth than the state average. In terms of per capita income,
the distance between the poorest four districts and the
2
Data on units is not a very reliable indicator of the strength of the IT
sector in AP. At any time the number of units reflects the number of units
If one analyses the relationship between the levels
registered with STPIH, and not those which are functional. In fact in
2003-04 the number of units registered has come down because a num-
of per capita income in the base year and growth rates of
ber of units have been de-registered since they had not been reporting DDP and per capita DDP, it can be seen that in some
any activity for more than three years. districts the higher growth rates could be due to a low
3
See Rao et al, (1998). For some useful references on the historical factors and base (Figure 4.3). However, in the nine districts which
developments in A.P. in the earlier decades see Mukund (1990), Radhakrishna
recorded higher growth rates than the state average in
(1990), Parthasarathy (1995), Vithal (1998).
4
per capita income, only four districts (Mahabubnagar,
The Directorate of Economics and Statistics provides domestic product for
each district in the state. These are available for the recent period 1993-94 to
Nizamabad, Warangal and Srikakulam) had a low base.
2003-04. It may be noted that the quality of growth is important.
in 2004-05 was very small. It indicates that urban areas in urban areas, while among Muslims the poverty ratios
contribute about half of the total poor in Andhra Pradesh. stood at 7 percent in rural and 35 percent in urban areas.
The poverty level among OBCs was closer to the general
Using NSS consumption data, the Sachar Committee
average in rural areas. It is interesting to note that the
Report (GOI, 2006) provides poverty ratios across socio-
incidence of poverty for Muslims was much higher than
religious categories (Figure 4.5). In their estimates for A.P
for Hindus in urban areas.
one can see the differential levels of poverty for different
groups. The SCs/STs together are the most poor, with a The available estimates at the regional level within
poverty ratio of 16 percent in rural areas and 41 percent the state indicate that the poverty ratios vary across regions
and that there are also rural-urban differences within each
Figure 4.5 : Poverty Ratios by Religion and Caste in region (Table 4.6). Telangana had the lowest incidence
AP, 2004-05
45
Table 4.6: Region Level Estimates of Poverty:
40 Rural Urban Official and Adjusted
35
30 1993-94 1999-2000
Poverty Ratio
25 Region
20 Rural Urban Rural Urban
15
10
1 2 3 4 5
5
0
Coastal 31.2 19.1 24.3 16.2
All SCs/STs OBCs General Muslims Other Telangana 25.9 12.1 20.6 9.7
Hindus Non - Hindus Rayalaseema I 38.6 20.0 33.1 27.3
Source : Sachar Committee report (GOI, 2006) Rayalaseema II 21.9 25.2 22.3 12.4
Andhra Pradesh 29.2 17.8 23.6 13.6
10
Deaton (2000, 2001) estimates unit prices for different states for the years Note : 1. NSSO Regions.
1987-88, 1993-94 and 1999-00 using the NSS data. Source : Lanjouw (2003)
Percentage
the pioneering states to initiate fiscal reforms earnestly, 20.0
15.0
along with the reforms package, during 1995-96. Before
10.0
the reforms were introduced the financial position of the
state was under stress. The fiscal deficit had led to higher 5.0
0.0
debt financing, which resulted in the burden of interest
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
payments which amounted to about 15 per cent of
government revenue. Several initiatives were undertaken
as part of the reform package. The earlier policy of to fill the gap in the revenue account. All the revenue
prohibition on liquor was reviewed to safeguard excise receipts of the state could meet about 80 to 90 per cent
revenue and the rice subsidy scheme and power tariffs, of the total expenditure during 1980s and 1990s. The
which put a tremendous stress on the state’s fiscal position, increase in the revenue account gap could be attributed
were moderated. This good beginning, although inadequate, to the decline in revenue receipts due to a reduction in
appears to have been reversed. The reforms process slowed excise tax collection owing to prohibition and a decline
down after a few years and the state was once again under in land (tax) revenue. On the other hand, there was a
financial stress. A rise in all three deficits - revenue, fiscal, great increase in expenditure owing to populist welfare
and primary - and the stock of outstanding debt touching policies of the government and the burden of increased
the level of about 30 per cent of the GSDP indicates the wages and salaries over the years. In particular, the
situation of deterioration (Sarma, 2003). But the situation expenditure on distribution of rice at Rs. 2 per kilo through
has improved in the recent past. the public distribution system (PDS) and subsidies on
irrigation and electricity increased the burden on the state
Andhra Pradesh was once characterized as a state government.
of surplus budgets in India. During the 1960s and 1970s
the state used to mobilize about 60 to 70 percent of its The increasing revenue deficit compelled the state
revenue from its own resources (both tax and non-tax) to divert resources meant for capital expenditure and
and the remainder used to come from the shared taxes resources mobilized through borrowings to cover the deficit.
The borrowings of the state were spent to fill the revenue
and grants of the central government. The total revenue
deficit and to repay loans. A massive burden of interest
that the state could mobilize used to meet all its revenue
payments in turn accentuated the revenue deficit. About
expenditure and sometimes even exceeded it, which resulted
20 per cent of the public debt raised was spent on repayment
in a surplus budget. The revenue surpluses were spent
of loans during the early 1990s. This increased to 60
14
GOAP (2008) Socio-Economic Survey 2007-08, Planning Department, percent in the late 1990s and rose further to 70 per cent
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. in the last few years. As a result, the productivity of
Share (%)
2000 40.0
genuineness of the claims of the government.17 In Andhra 1500 30.0
Pradesh, total public expenditure as a percentage of GSDP 1000
PCTE
PCSSE 20.0
seems to have increased in the 1980s while there was Share of SS
500 10.0
no increase in the 1990s, and the share was in fact lower
0 0.0
1956-57
1958-59
1960-61
1962-63
1964-65
1966-67
1968-69
1970-71
1972-73
1974-75
1976-77
1978-79
1980-81
1982-83
1984-85
1986-87
1988-89
1990-91
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1998-99
2000-01
2002-03
2004-05
2006-07
15
Fiscal targets set by FRBM Act were reduction of revenue deficit to nil by the
year 2009 and generate surplus thereafter; the fiscal deficit should not be more
than 3 per cent of GSDP; and the debt-GSDP ratio should not exceed 35
17
Implementation processes are also absolutely crucial. Since government
percent by 2010. The recent fiscal performance of AP seems to be within these
agents are usually very important in implementation, the commitment of the
limits.
government can also be studied in the implementation processes. The present
16
On the receipts front, introduction of VAT and higher fiscal transfers chapter focuses, however, only on budgets and expenditures.
recommended by the Twelfth Finance Commission (TFC) are two important 18
Social sector expenditure is defined as the total expenditure on ‘Social
factors. When it comes to expenditure, enactment of FRBM Act and commitment
Services’ and ‘Rural Development’ as given in Central and State budgets.
for fiscal correction process in reaching the set targets of revenue balance and
19
fiscal deficit as prescribed under FRBM rule, Debt Swap Scheme, TFC’s Debt A.P. spent around 6 to 11 per cent of its GSDP on the social sector in the last
Consolidation and Waiver Facility, New Pension Policy, and various measures two decades. In 1980-81, the share in GSDP was 7.5 per cent and increased to
taken by RBI as the Government’s debt manager. 11 per cent in 1986-87; thereafter it started declining.
Table 4.9: Per capita Expenditure (93-94 prices) on Social Sector in Southern States
Total Social Services Rural Development Total Social Sector
State
1990-1 1995-6 2000-1 2004-5 1990-1 1995-6 2000-1 2004-5 1990-1 1995-6 2000-1 2004-5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
AP 440 547 705 754 97 67 111 121 537 614 816 874
Karnataka 469 563 781 777 76 56 56 66 545 619 836 843
Kerala 612 643 858 968 59 53 162 209 671 696 1020 1177
Tamilnadu 617 637 867 994 79 46 88 79 696 682 955 1072
Note : The data given in RBI Bulletins is deflated by taking WPI at 93-94 base year and using interpolated Census data of 1991 and 2001.
Source : RBI Bulletins
1990s. It increased from Rs. 318 in 1980-81 to Rs.528 Thus, A.P. has done relatively well in terms of economic
in 1989-90 and was stagnant in the first half of the 1990s. growth in recent years.
Thereafter per capita expenditure again began to increase (2) Regional disparities across the state in economic
and crossed Rs. 1000 in 2006-07. The average for the growth are significant although there are signs of
1980s and 90s respectively was Rs.447.4 and Rs.624.7. improvement. The trends in the growth of district domestic
This increase in per capita terms may be partially attributed product during 1993-94 to 2004-05 shows that 7 districts
to the lower growth rate of population during 1991-2001. of Telangana (Ranga Reddy, Nizamabad, Khammam,
Hyderabad, Mahabubnagar, Warangal and Medak) and
In comparison to the other southern states, the
expenditure on social services as a percentage of GSDP
was lower for Andhra Pradesh in the 90s but the expenditure
on rural development was higher in the state. The same
situation prevails with respect to per capita expenditure
on social services and rural development (Table 4.9).
4.6 Conclusions
This chapter has examined the macro economic scene
in terms of economic growth, infrastructure, poverty and
fiscal management. The conclusions of the chapter are
the following.
Percent Cultivators to
Percent Agricultural Labourers to
total Population
total Workers
>35 >50
30-35 40-50
20-30 30-40
<20 <30
0 50 100 150 Kms
0 50 100 150 Kms
Percent Cultivators to
Percent Agricultural Labourers to
total Population
total Workers
>35 >50
30-35 40-50
20-30 30-40
<20 <30
0 50 100 150 Kms
0 50 100 150 Kms
Table 4.9: Per capita Expenditure (93-94 prices) on Social Sector in Southern States
Total Social Services Rural Development Total Social Sector
State
1990-1 1995-6 2000-1 2004-5 1990-1 1995-6 2000-1 2004-5 1990-1 1995-6 2000-1 2004-5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
AP 440 547 705 754 97 67 111 121 537 614 816 874
Karnataka 469 563 781 777 76 56 56 66 545 619 836 843
Kerala 612 643 858 968 59 53 162 209 671 696 1020 1177
Tamilnadu 617 637 867 994 79 46 88 79 696 682 955 1072
Note : The data given in RBI Bulletins is deflated by taking WPI at 93-94 base year and using interpolated Census data of 1991 and 2001.
Source : RBI Bulletins
1990s. It increased from Rs. 318 in 1980-81 to Rs.528 Thus, A.P. has done relatively well in terms of economic
in 1989-90 and was stagnant in the first half of the 1990s. growth in recent years.
Thereafter per capita expenditure again began to increase (2) Regional disparities across the state in economic
and crossed Rs. 1000 in 2006-07. The average for the growth are significant although there are signs of
1980s and 90s respectively was Rs.447.4 and Rs.624.7. improvement. The trends in the growth of district domestic
This increase in per capita terms may be partially attributed product during 1993-94 to 2004-05 shows that 7 districts
to the lower growth rate of population during 1991-2001. of Telangana (Ranga Reddy, Nizamabad, Khammam,
Hyderabad, Mahabubnagar, Warangal and Medak) and
In comparison to the other southern states, the
expenditure on social services as a percentage of GSDP
was lower for Andhra Pradesh in the 90s but the expenditure
on rural development was higher in the state. The same
situation prevails with respect to per capita expenditure
on social services and rural development (Table 4.9).
4.6 Conclusions
This chapter has examined the macro economic scene
in terms of economic growth, infrastructure, poverty and
fiscal management. The conclusions of the chapter are
the following.
Share (%)
2000 40.0
genuineness of the claims of the government.17 In Andhra 1500 30.0
Pradesh, total public expenditure as a percentage of GSDP 1000
PCTE
PCSSE 20.0
seems to have increased in the 1980s while there was Share of SS
500 10.0
no increase in the 1990s, and the share was in fact lower
0 0.0
1956-57
1958-59
1960-61
1962-63
1964-65
1966-67
1968-69
1970-71
1972-73
1974-75
1976-77
1978-79
1980-81
1982-83
1984-85
1986-87
1988-89
1990-91
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1998-99
2000-01
2002-03
2004-05
2006-07
15
Fiscal targets set by FRBM Act were reduction of revenue deficit to nil by the
year 2009 and generate surplus thereafter; the fiscal deficit should not be more
than 3 per cent of GSDP; and the debt-GSDP ratio should not exceed 35
17
Implementation processes are also absolutely crucial. Since government
percent by 2010. The recent fiscal performance of AP seems to be within these
agents are usually very important in implementation, the commitment of the
limits.
government can also be studied in the implementation processes. The present
16
On the receipts front, introduction of VAT and higher fiscal transfers chapter focuses, however, only on budgets and expenditures.
recommended by the Twelfth Finance Commission (TFC) are two important 18
Social sector expenditure is defined as the total expenditure on ‘Social
factors. When it comes to expenditure, enactment of FRBM Act and commitment
Services’ and ‘Rural Development’ as given in Central and State budgets.
for fiscal correction process in reaching the set targets of revenue balance and
19
fiscal deficit as prescribed under FRBM rule, Debt Swap Scheme, TFC’s Debt A.P. spent around 6 to 11 per cent of its GSDP on the social sector in the last
Consolidation and Waiver Facility, New Pension Policy, and various measures two decades. In 1980-81, the share in GSDP was 7.5 per cent and increased to
taken by RBI as the Government’s debt manager. 11 per cent in 1986-87; thereafter it started declining.
Percentage
the pioneering states to initiate fiscal reforms earnestly, 20.0
15.0
along with the reforms package, during 1995-96. Before
10.0
the reforms were introduced the financial position of the
state was under stress. The fiscal deficit had led to higher 5.0
0.0
debt financing, which resulted in the burden of interest
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
payments which amounted to about 15 per cent of
government revenue. Several initiatives were undertaken
as part of the reform package. The earlier policy of to fill the gap in the revenue account. All the revenue
prohibition on liquor was reviewed to safeguard excise receipts of the state could meet about 80 to 90 per cent
revenue and the rice subsidy scheme and power tariffs, of the total expenditure during 1980s and 1990s. The
which put a tremendous stress on the state’s fiscal position, increase in the revenue account gap could be attributed
were moderated. This good beginning, although inadequate, to the decline in revenue receipts due to a reduction in
appears to have been reversed. The reforms process slowed excise tax collection owing to prohibition and a decline
down after a few years and the state was once again under in land (tax) revenue. On the other hand, there was a
financial stress. A rise in all three deficits - revenue, fiscal, great increase in expenditure owing to populist welfare
and primary - and the stock of outstanding debt touching policies of the government and the burden of increased
the level of about 30 per cent of the GSDP indicates the wages and salaries over the years. In particular, the
situation of deterioration (Sarma, 2003). But the situation expenditure on distribution of rice at Rs. 2 per kilo through
has improved in the recent past. the public distribution system (PDS) and subsidies on
irrigation and electricity increased the burden on the state
Andhra Pradesh was once characterized as a state government.
of surplus budgets in India. During the 1960s and 1970s
the state used to mobilize about 60 to 70 percent of its The increasing revenue deficit compelled the state
revenue from its own resources (both tax and non-tax) to divert resources meant for capital expenditure and
and the remainder used to come from the shared taxes resources mobilized through borrowings to cover the deficit.
The borrowings of the state were spent to fill the revenue
and grants of the central government. The total revenue
deficit and to repay loans. A massive burden of interest
that the state could mobilize used to meet all its revenue
payments in turn accentuated the revenue deficit. About
expenditure and sometimes even exceeded it, which resulted
20 per cent of the public debt raised was spent on repayment
in a surplus budget. The revenue surpluses were spent
of loans during the early 1990s. This increased to 60
14
GOAP (2008) Socio-Economic Survey 2007-08, Planning Department, percent in the late 1990s and rose further to 70 per cent
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. in the last few years. As a result, the productivity of
in 2004-05 was very small. It indicates that urban areas in urban areas, while among Muslims the poverty ratios
contribute about half of the total poor in Andhra Pradesh. stood at 7 percent in rural and 35 percent in urban areas.
The poverty level among OBCs was closer to the general
Using NSS consumption data, the Sachar Committee
average in rural areas. It is interesting to note that the
Report (GOI, 2006) provides poverty ratios across socio-
incidence of poverty for Muslims was much higher than
religious categories (Figure 4.5). In their estimates for A.P
for Hindus in urban areas.
one can see the differential levels of poverty for different
groups. The SCs/STs together are the most poor, with a The available estimates at the regional level within
poverty ratio of 16 percent in rural areas and 41 percent the state indicate that the poverty ratios vary across regions
and that there are also rural-urban differences within each
Figure 4.5 : Poverty Ratios by Religion and Caste in region (Table 4.6). Telangana had the lowest incidence
AP, 2004-05
45
Table 4.6: Region Level Estimates of Poverty:
40 Rural Urban Official and Adjusted
35
30 1993-94 1999-2000
Poverty Ratio
25 Region
20 Rural Urban Rural Urban
15
10
1 2 3 4 5
5
0
Coastal 31.2 19.1 24.3 16.2
All SCs/STs OBCs General Muslims Other Telangana 25.9 12.1 20.6 9.7
Hindus Non - Hindus Rayalaseema I 38.6 20.0 33.1 27.3
Source : Sachar Committee report (GOI, 2006) Rayalaseema II 21.9 25.2 22.3 12.4
Andhra Pradesh 29.2 17.8 23.6 13.6
10
Deaton (2000, 2001) estimates unit prices for different states for the years Note : 1. NSSO Regions.
1987-88, 1993-94 and 1999-00 using the NSS data. Source : Lanjouw (2003)
Table 6.1: Changing Structure of the Agrarian Economy in Andhra Pradesh: The Percentage Distribution of
Operational Holdings by Size Class, 1956-2006
Share in Number of Holding Share in Operated Area Avg
Year
Marginal Small Semi- Medium Medium Large Marginal Small Semi- Medium Medium Large Size
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1955-56 38.6 18.3 17.7 16.7 8.7 7.9 9.7 16.1 28.1 38.2 2.43
1970-71 46.0 18.5 17.4 12.7 4.3 8.0 11.3 19.2 30.8 30.7 2.51
1976-77 46.6 20.3 17.4 12.2 3.4 9.3 12.8 20.8 32.3 24.8 -
1980-81 49.3 20.9 16.0 9.1 2.1 13.1 16.2 23.3 28.7 18.7 1.94
1985-86 54.2 20.8 15.2 8.0 1.8 14.5 17.3 24.0 27.3 16.3 -
1990-91 56.0 21.2 14.5 6.9 1.3 16.4 19.6 25.2 26.1 12.8 1.50
2000-01 60.9 21.8 12.4 4.3 0.6 21.6 24.8 26.4 19.8 7.5 1.25
2005-06 61.6 21.9 12.0 4.0 0.5 22.7 25.8 26.5 19.0 6.1 1.20
Note : 1. Marginal – 0 to 1 hectare; Small – 1 to 2 hectare; Semi-medium – 2 to 4 hectare; Medium – 4 to 10 hectare; and Large – 10
and above hectare; 2. Avg - Average Size of the Holding is given in hectares.
Source : Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES), Hyderabad.
Legislative measures were also initiated following Legislation on ceilings on agricultural holdings was
Article 46 of the Constitution that made it obligatory for enacted in two phases, 1955-72 and 1972 to the present.
The Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agriculture
Holdings) Acts were passed in 1961 and 1973. As in
1
Land reforms included abolition of Zamindari system and all intermediaries
most states, the first round of legislation in 1961 was a
since the beginning of the fifties; the introduction of a family ceiling in the
mid-fifties; reduction of the ceiling limit, consolidation of land holdings and
miserable failure but the second one in 1973 had some
monitoring the progress of the distribution of ceiling surplus land as part of impact. Against an estimated surplus land of 20 lakh acres,
the 20- Point Programme of the Central Government. Tenancy reforms were only 7.9 Lakh acres were declared surplus, of which 6.47
intended to abolish or regulate tenancy to ensure fixed tenures and a fair rent. Lakh acres were taken possession by the government and
The Constitution of India was amended 13 times for the incorporation of 277
5.82 lakh acres were distributed among 4.79 lakh
land laws in the Ninth Schedule. The last such amendment was the 78th
Amendment of the Constitution to incorporate 27 land laws in that Schedule. 3
A spate of earlier legislation like the AP Land Reforms (Ceiling on agriculture
2
The major objectives of land reforms have been the re-ordering of agrarian holdings) Act of 1973 had not been properly implemented. Big landlords had
relations in order to achieve an egalitarian social structure, elimination of not declared their excess land, and where they had, it was fallow land.
exploitation in land relations, realising the goal of land to the tiller, enlarging Whatever be the intention of the government of the day, even the Assigned
the land base of the rural poor, increasing agricultural productivity and infusing Land Act has been observed only in the breach. There are numerous instances
an element of equality in local institutions. of assigned land being purchased from the poor at cheap prices by the rich.
Table 6.3: Contribution of Districts to the Total Cropped and Irrigated Area declined
in Andhra Pradesh
Net Sown Area Net Irrigated Area
Range
Districts Contb Districts Contb.
1 2 3 4 5
Very High Mahabubnagar (17.5), Nalgonda, (13.4) 53.8 West Godavari (13.1), Guntur (13.0), Krishna 47.7
Chittoor (12.3) Karimnagar (10.6) (11.5), Prakasam (10.1)
High Nizamabad (7.5), Prakasam (6.4), 24.9 Nalgonda (8.8), Karimnagar (8.4), Anantapur (6.8), 35.0
Khammam (6.2), Rangareddy (4.8) Visakhapatnam (5.8), Nizamabad (5.2)
Low East Godavari (4.1), Adilabad (3.9), 21.3 Khammam (4.3), Mahabubnagar (4.0), 27.0
Srikakulam (3.5), Krishna (3.2), Nellore (3.5), East Godavari (3.2),
Visakhapatnam & Vizianagaram (2.4), Vizianagaram (3.0), Chittoor (2.9),
Guntur (1.9), Kurnool (0.8), Medak (2.5), Srikakulam, (2.3),
Warangal (0.7), West Godavari (0.6), Rangareddy (1.3).
Kadapa (0.4), Medak (0.1)
Increase Anantapur (1.5), Nellore (1.1) 2.6 Adilabad (4.3), Warangal, (4.0), 9.6
Kadapa (1.1), Kurnool (0.2)
Note : 1. Figures presented in parentheses are percentages of each district to the total area declined in the state and col. 3 and 5 are the percentage
contribution of the group of district; 2. Contb. – Contribution of district to the total at the state level.
6
Livestock includes dairying, poultry, small ruminants and piggery. 7
Based on Divisia index
Source: Primary survey conducted by CESS during 2004 Agricultural extension services account for only 9
percent of the farmers’ information on agricultural technology
size and the proportion of farmers investing in borewells.
in the State. With the virtual breakdown of the extension
While it was 14.1 per cent among marginal farmers, it
machinery, small and marginal farmers have become
was as high as 46.7 per cent among large farmers. The
increasingly dependent upon private agents for extension
average investment per household was about Rs. 25000.
services. Input dealers (30 percent) and other progressive
A high proportion of this investment (56.1 per cent) farmers (34 percent) constitute the major sources of
was lost due to failure of wells without much variation information8 . Such agents were subject to less regulation
across farm size (Table 6.7). However, the loss increases than before, leading to circumstances in which resource-
with farm size in absolute terms as the amount invested
poor farmers became victims of exploitation.
has positive association with farm size because large
farmers invest in more than one well. It is significant to 6.6 Agrarian Distress and Farmers’ Suicides
note that the loss is highest in South Telangana (66.5 per The agrarian economy of Andhra Pradesh has been
cent) followed by Rayalaseema (54.9 per cent). These in distress since the 1990s. The state is one of those states
are the areas where rainfall is poor and surface irrigation
with highest number of farmers’ suicides in the country.
is also low. Except in North Coastal Andhra, where
The agrarian distress in the state9 coincided with the period
investment in borewells is negligible, loss of investment
in which reforms were initiated.
is more than 45 per cent in all the other regions. A field
survey conducted in four Telangana villages revealed that 8
See (NSSO – Report 499 -2005)
one-third of the farmers deepened their wells every five 9
The State of Andhra Pradesh has acquired a special place, in more than one
years, indicating that groundwater levels were falling. In sense, in implementing the economic reforms in all sectors, including in
the case of marginal and small farmers, expenditure on agriculture.
10
This is yet another form of usury that benefits the trader-dealer who rolls in
as a moneylender with a tie-up for buying the commodity at harvest time.
Peasant farming is exposed to perpetuation of multiple modes of exploitation
11
owing to uncertainty. See (NSSO 2005, Report 498)
extension particularly for small and marginal farmers. Another important aspect is the high level of
There are different models of marketing: self-help groups, indebtedness. One of the major factors for high indebtedness
co-operative model similar to dairy, small producer co- is investment in wells and frequent failures. There is no
operatives and contract farming. Given the price situation, insurance against this investment and most of this investment
farmers can be helped by providing marketing facilities is financed by informal sources. The co-operative sector,
at production points. Andhra Pradesh introduced a new which is active in other states, plays a negligible role in
model of marketing for maize based on the principles of the state. It is desirable to regulate investment in groundwater
decentralization and local participation during 2005. and extend insurance coverage for it. The present government
is rightly giving importance to irrigation but it has to take
It is known that there is very little scope for further a holistic view of agriculture rather than concentrating
expansion of net sown area and land scarcity will become only on irrigation. Short term and long term measures
an acute feature of the rural economy. The reasons for are required to come out of the agrarian crisis and prevent
decline in land and water resources and increase in fallow suicides by farmers.
land have to be identified at the local level and measures
have to be taken to solve the problems. The productivity To conclude, small-marginal farmers will be unviable
levels are low in well irrigation because of low availability without substantial public infrastructure support and
of water. Water conservation measures are needed by comprehensive social security including health, education,
way of improvement of tanks and rainwater harvesting employment and old age support. They are indeed risk
to improve the recharge of groundwater. An integrated taking small agricultural entrepreneurs. The state may
development of different sources of irrigation is needed have to own the responsibility for the social costs of
to rectify the adverse effects of the lopsided development investment in the development of land and water (including
of groundwater exploitation. Water is a precious national groundwater) resources, provision of adequate economic
asset and there are several concerns regarding water support by way of institutional credit, extension services,
resources in the country. Therefore, a judicious use of quality input supply and remunerative prices as well as
land and water resources will have to be the central concern social sector support of ensuring quality education and
of agricultural growth policies. health facilities.
In India, according to the Census, there were about 24.7 million people of 60 years and above who comprised 5.6 per cent of the total population
in 1961.This number has increased to 70.5 million (7.1 per cent) in 2001. In Andhra Pradesh, the aged population increased from 2.2 to 5.6 millions (the
percentage to total population increased from 6.2 to 7.6 per cent) from 1961 to 2001. The burden of ageing appears to be higher in Andhra Pradesh than
the all-India average. From a policy perspective, this means that the state has to design a policy to take care of old people and attend to the socio-economic
problems associated with old age7 .
normal for a human being6 . According to Census 2001 People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in the world, around
there were 1.2 million households, comprising 7 per cent five million are in India, and of these almost one tenth
of the total households, with at least one disabled member i.e. around five lakh persons are in Andhra Pradesh. According
in Andhra Pradesh. Around 78 per cent of these households to the estimates given by NACO, of the total number of
are located in rural areas. One member is disabled in 5 1,03,857 AIDS cases reported in the country till 31 July
percent (41,600) of the households, while there are two 2005, as many as 11,280 cases, accounting for nearly 11
or more disabled persons in around 10.5 per cent (1.3 percent are from Andhra Pradesh and so far, the state
lakh) households. This problem needs supportive action has recorded 739 AIDS related deaths. Among the major
from the state.
states in India, Andhra Pradesh has a large number of
7.3.1 HIV/AIDS in Andhra Pradesh cases with HIV/AIDS. Moreover, the state is one of the
While advances in medicine have greatly reduced six Indian states with the highest prevalence rate besides
the occurrence of diseases like malaria and leprosy, HIV/ Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu, Manipur and Nagaland.
AIDS has become a serious challenge for the world, for These six states in India together accounted for nearly
both the developing as well as developed countries. HIV/ 83 percent of the AIDS cases in the country.
AIDS is more than a health problem as it indirectly affects According to NFHS 3 (2005-06), while the prevalence
many other sectors in the economy and therefore is rate of HIV at the national level is 0.35 percent (0.26 and
considered to be a serious threat to economic growth. 0.46 per cent respectively for female and males) of 15-
In terms of magnitude, though the prevalence rate 49 age group population, (Figure 7.2) Andhra Pradesh
of HIV/AIDS in India seems to be at an insignificant has the highest prevalence rate 0.97 percent (0.75 and
level, it has been increasing over time ever since the first 1.22 per cent respectively for females and males), next
infected case was discovered. Estimates by UNAIDS of to Manipur among Indian states. Based on the prevalence
HIV/AIDS infected cases in India are higher than the figures rate the number of people who tested HIV positive are
given by National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO). around 18 lakh at the all-India level and 4 lakh in Andhra
According to UNAIDS estimates for 2004, of the 42 million Pradesh. These numbers may go up if we include other
6
Figure 7.2: HIV Prevalence Rate (15-49 Age Group)
NSS survey on disability shows that in 1981 there were nearly 12 million
persons in India with one kind of physical or mental disability. The number
1.5 AP
Prevalance rate
was 16 million in 1991 and 19 million in 2001, an indication of the increasing India
burden of the number of disabled persons over the period. According to the
latest Census estimates, there are 21.9 million disabled persons in India, of
1
whom 9.3 million or 42 percent are women. About 75 per cent are located in
0.5
the rural areas.
7
The severity of the problem depends upon the endowment of human capital 0
(in terms of health and skills) of the old. Andhra Pradesh as well as India is Persons Males Females
facing the problem of ageing without human capital endowment. Source : NFHS III (2005-06).
20
The existing corporate hospitals have been opened by doctors (either NRI or
local) and local business families. All of them are promoted by the local
dominant agricultural castes (Kamma, Raju, Reddy and Velama) and most of
them are family controlled and managed by family members who are doctors
by profession.
Percent
80
spending. However, inadequate public funding of health 60
6.0
40 4.0
care and inadequate and poor quality of health care facilities 2.0
20
are forcing people to go to private medical services, paying 0 0.0
1930-61
1962-63
1964-65
1966-67
1968-69
1970-71
1972-73
1974-75
1976-77
1978-79
1980-81
1982-83
1984-85
1986-87
1988-89
1990-91
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1998-99
2000-01
2002-03
2004-05
2006-07
for them from their personal resources.
In Andhra Pradesh, according to the NSS 61st (2004-
05) round, on an average nearly 6 per cent of total PCHE % of HE in TE
household consumption expenditure is spent on medical At constant (1993-94) prices, per capita public
care (both institutional and non-institutional), which is expenditure on health care was about Rs.58 during the
in fact higher than the all-India average. Annual government Fifth Five Year Plan. It increased by about 45 percent in
expenditure on health sectors has been below 5 per cent
the next two five-year plans and reached Rs.85 per capita
of total expenditure in Andhra Pradesh, especially in the
during the Seventh Five Year Plan (1985-1990). However,
recent past. In per capita terms, household expenditure
there was a significant reduction in per capita public
on health care in current prices was around Rs. 39 per
expenditure on health care and other services in the 1990s.
month in rural areas and Rs. 53 per month in urban areas.
It declined from Rs.85 in the Seventh plan to Rs.73 in
The average for a year would be Rs. 463 and Rs. 634 per
the Eighth Plan. When compared to economic services,
capita in rural and urban areas, and the average for rural
public expenditure on social services, and especially on
and urban areas was Rs. 518 per capita in the state, which
health services, fell sharply.
was higher than the all-India average. Per capita expenditure
by the government of Andhra Pradesh on health (Rs. 188 Box 7.6: Consequence of Private Health Care -
per capita per annum in 2004, in current prices) is well Falling into Poverty
below household expenditure. Household expenditure The public health care system is unable to meet the rapidly
accounted for 73 per cent of total per capita expenditure increasing demand for health care services. The private sector,
ranging from clinics to corporate hospitals, is filling this gap with
(i.e. Rs. 518 and Rs.188 would be Rs. 706) on medical profit motive and at the expense of out-of-pocket finance. The
care. pricing of private health care services is very high and without
proper regulation.
The overall decline in the share of the health sector
in the government budget, particularly after the introduction One study reveals that expenses incurred on health care
have resulted in some households falling into poverty (See Anirudh
of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), has further
Krishna, 2004)
worsened the scarcity of resources for the health sector.
The share of the health sector in the state budget was All this clearly indicates the adverse impact of the
highest (6.5 per cent) in the Fifth Five Year Plan (FYP) Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) on the provision
period. Thereafter it declined continuously and fell to of health and other social services. Moreover, though
5.2 per cent in the Eighth FYP. Despite the increase in per capita public health expenditure increased over the
the share of social services in total expenditure, the share period, it was not sufficient to meet the increasing demand
of health expenditure declined during Sixth and Seventh for health care services in the state because there was a
FYPs. It was marginally higher (5.4 per cent) in the Ninth continuous increase in the share of salaries in hospital
Plan due to added resources of World Bank projects, but budgets from about 52 per cent in 1974 to 80 per cent in
declined to 4.5 per cent by 2005-06 (see Figure 7.5). 1995. This left very little resources for the supply of materials
>60
secondary and tertiary hospitals even in the urban areas.
50- 60 One of the constraints is the low salary in the public
40 - 50
<40
sector when compared to incomes in the private sector.
It is also partly due to the lack of adequate facilities and
0 50 100 150 Kms
overcrowding of patients in public hospitals. It may not
be possible to provide salaries comparable to incomes
7.9.1 Public Private Partnership: Policy Imperatives
in the private sector.
Public subsidies and lack of regulatory mechanisms In recent times the provision of universal health
to control supplier induced demand have resulted in a insurance through self-help groups for the poor has been
very large private sector in medical care in the state. Given widely discussed but this is not feasible simply because
its size, the role of private medical care is the basic public the health care facilities are not available in most rural
policy issue in the health sector. areas either in the public or the private sector. The bed
one of laggard states in literacy. In this context, this chapter deals with educational
development in Andhra Pradesh focussing on levels and
trends in literacy and schooling, supply factors like schools,
teachers, physical infrastructure and financial resources.
8.1 Levels and Trends in Literacy
8.1.1 Crude Literacy
The literacy level/rate is a rather crude measure which
is derived in terms of number of literates divided by the
Education 95
total population excluding the population in the age group literacy in Andhra Pradesh was about 30 percent as compared
0-6 years. The best record in literacy so far at both the to about 40 percent in India and the increase in female
national and state levels was during the nineties. The literacy was about 66.6 percent in Andhra Pradesh as
literacy rate in India increased from 52.2 to 65.4 per cent compared to about 100 percent in India. The opposite
during 1991-2001 (see Table 8.1). Whereas the decadal pattern emerged between 1981 and 2001when male and
improvement at the national level had been not more female literacy rates increased by about 80 percent and
than 8 percentage points till 1991 and the nineties witnessed 150 percent respectively in Andhra Pradesh as compared
an improvement of 13.8 percentage points. Literacy in to about 36 percent and 80 percent respectively in all-
Andhra Pradesh increased by 17 percentage points during India.
the 1990s from 44.1 per cent in 1991 to 61.1 percent in
Gender equality in literacy, measured in terms of
2001. In spite of this faster rate of growth, the literacy
the ratio of female literacy rate to male literacy rate, is
rate in Andhra Pradesh is still lower than the all-India
quite impressive (greater than 75) in districts such as West
average. While the literacy rate of Andhra Pradesh was
Godavari, East Godavari, Krishna, Nellore and Guntur.
about three-fourths of the all-India level in 1961, the state
It is the lowest for Mahabubnagar (56.4) and hovers around
has made substantial progress subsequently, especially
50 for Kurnool, Medak, Adilabad, Anantpur and Nizamabad
in the last two decades. In spite of this, the state is still
districts. In many of these districts the female literacy
one of the educationally backward states in India in terms
rate is less than 30.
of literacy and Andhra Pradesh is among the three least
literate states in the country.
While the overall literacy rate has gone up from 44
per cent in 1991 to 61 percent in 2001, the male literacy
rate has increased from 55 to 71 per cent. What is encouraging
is that the female literacy rate has gone up by about 50
Table 8.1: Literacy Rate in A P and India
Andhra Pradesh All-India
Year Person Male Female Person Male Female
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1961 21 30 12 28 40 15
1971 25 33 16 34 46 22
1981 30 39 20 44 56 30 Literacy rates at Mandal level
1991 44 55 33 52 64 39
It is always useful to study the situation at the grass
2001 61 71 51 65 76 54
root level in order to take constructive steps to improve
Note : 1. Literacy is for 5 + age population till 1981 and after that,
for 7 + age population; 2. Figures presented are in percent. literacy levels. Using the data from both the 1991 and
Source : Census of India. 2001 censuses1 , at the mandal level a considerable increase
in female literacy rate (FLR) was observed across mandals
percent, i.e. from 33 percent in 1991 to 51 percent in in each district in this decade.
2001. The ratio of male literacy to female literacy has According to the 2001 census in 77.6 per cent of
come down after 1981, indicating a reduction in gender the mandals in Coastal Andhra and 67.6 per cent of mandals
inequality in literacy.
1
The rural and partially urban mandals are classified according to the level of
It is also observed that the progress of literacy in female literacy rate during 1990-91 to 2000-01. The class intervals considered
Andhra Pradesh lagged substantially behind all-India during for the female literacy rate are 0-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50 and greater than or
1961 to 1981. During this period, the increase in male equal to 50.
50.0
40.0 Godavari, East Godavari and Krishna.
30.0
20.0
10.0
These figures suggest that the rate of dropping-out
0.0 of school is much higher among rural adults than among
Total Rural Urban
urban adults especially among adult women.
Source : Census of Andhra Pradesh
The gender disparity index in literacy increases with
2
the level of education both in rural and urban areas and
According to Census 1961, there were about 72 million literates in the
population aged 15 years and above, which was 27 per cent of the adult (15+)
is significantly higher in rural areas. Non-literate adult
population (around 259 million) in India. The number of literates in adult females and those with an educational level below primary
population in India increased to 251 million in 1991 and the percentage of together constitute about 75 percent of the adult female
literates in adult population increased to 48 percent. population in rural areas and about 43 percent in urban
Education 97
areas. Among adult males the corresponding figures are 50.4 to 61.3 per cent. Krishna, West Godavari and Hyderabad
about 53 percent and 25 percent respectively. Further, may be classified as high literacy category districts with
only about 11.9 percent of the adult females in rural areas literacy varying between 63.9 to 77.0 per cent.
have studied up to and beyond middle school, whereas
8.1.3 Proximate Literacy
in urban areas the corresponding figure is about 40 percent.
For the adult male population, the corresponding figures Because of the externality effect of one literate member
are 28.8 and 59.8 percent respectively. on the illiterate members of a household, households
with at least one literate member have an advantage over
Against this background, it would seem that the Adult
those which had none,4 for the benefits of literacy will
Literacy Campaign should be strengthened, so that both
spread to other members. It is also to be noted that the
non-literate adults and adults with low levels of schooling
activity pattern of a household is likely to be related with
should be brought to the level of primary school, if not
their level of literacy. It is more appropriate to consider
to the level of middle school. About 23 per cent of literate
literacy at the household level rather than individual level
females in the age group of fifteen years plus (23 and
and identify the households in which all the members
56.2 percent in rural and urban areas respectively) have
are illiterate so that the literacy programmes can target
had schooling up to middle school and above. Among
such households first. According to the NSSO 61st round
males of age 15 years and above, the corresponding figures
(2004-05) survey, the incidence of illiterate households
in rural and urban areas are about 45.7 percent and 69
(all the adult member are illiterates) is relatively much
percent respectively.
higher in Andhra Pradesh than all-India.
Literacy levels among adults in the age group 15 to 29
It is observed that the percentage of households having
years
no literate adult female member (F) in rural Andhra Pradesh
Literacy rates and levels of education for the age has decreased from 71.4 in 1999-00 to 57.7 in 2004-05.
group 15 to 29 years give a good indication of recent In rural all-India, it had decreased from 60.9 in 1999-00
progress in literacy and level of education. The literacy3 to 50.0 in 2004-05 (see Table 8.2). In Kerala, the most
rate for this age group is highly encouraging and indicates literate state, the percentage of households which had
a considerable progress in literacy between 1991 and no literate adult female member (F) in rural areas was
2001. However, about 59 percent of women and about 5.6 during 2004-05. The percentage of households having
28 percent of men in rural areas in this age group are
either non-literate or have an education level below primary Table 8.2: Percentage of Households with no literate adult (All) /
school. adult female in AP, Kerala and All-India
2004-05 1999-2000
At the district level, Mahabubnagar, Vizianagaram, State
All Female All Female
Medak, Adilabad and Nizamabad may be classified as
1 2 3 4 5
low literacy districts with literacy rates (of 15 to 29 years
Rural
age group) between 37.4 and 44.1 percent. Karimnagar,
Andhra Pradesh 36.4 57.7 44.8 71.4
Srikakulam, Kurnool, Anantapur, Warangal, Khammam
Kerala 2.8 5.6 2.9 9.2
and Nalgonda may be classified as low medium literacy
All-India 26.1 50.0 32.1 60.9
districts with literacy rates between 46.2 and 49.3. Prakasam,
Urban
Visakhapatnam, Kadapa, Guntur, Nellore, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh 12.7 28.1 17.2 38.7
Chittoor and Rangareddi may be classified as high medium Kerala 1.1 3.1 1.6 10.7
literacy category districts with literacy rates varying between All-India 8.4 19.5 11.6 34.6
3
The literates and the literacy levels with education levels of primary school Source : NSS Employment and Unemployment Survey.
and above and middle school and above are computed for each district and
4
separately for rural and urban areas. Basu and Foster, 1998; Basu at al, 1999; Subramanian, 2004.
5
Owing to late or early enrolment or repeaters.
Education 99
This achievement, however, is vitiated by the high state during the 1990s. The Census of India projections
drop-out rate. All the enrolled children may not be retained indicate that the growth will be negative especially in
in school, and actual attendance would be less than the 5-14 age group during 2001-11. As per the Census
enrolment. High drop-out rate reduces the retention rate 2001 there were about 17.7 million children in the age
and the completion rate. Andhra Pradesh is regarded as group 5-14 years. Projections show that the child population
a state with high drop-out and low retention rates. However, would decline to 15.8 million in 2006 and further to
a different opinion has also been expressed. A more recent 14.4 million by 2011. It may be noted that because of
data source, the District Information on School Education the decline in the child population, universal elementary
(DISE), contradicts the drop-out rate given by the Department education will be achieved in Andhra Pradesh if the same
of School Education (AP). The drop-out rate in the state momentum in enrolment trend were to continue.
has declined steadily over the years. According to the
8.2.1 Children Attending Schools
data of the Department of School Education (AP), at primary
school level, the drop-out rate was 70.65 per cent in It is generally recognized that data available from
1971-72 which had gradually declined to 24.73 per cent the MHRD overestimate the number of school-going children,
in 2005-06. Though a similar decline is observed in the which may lead to misleading results while measuring
upper primary stage the drop-out rate is still rather high the schooling status of children, especially in 5-14 age
and has to be reduced. According DISE source, the drop- group. The Census of India and NSS may be a better
out would be around 10.8 in AP for the year 2005-06. alternative source of data7 .
These differences are due to differences in the way drop- In India, usually, 5 to 14 years of age is considered
out is calculated. as suitable age for the elementary school cycle, 8 (I to
VIII grades) years of schooling. But in Andhra Pradesh
the corresponding age group is 6 to 14 and 7 (I to VII
grades) years of schooling, which may be more realistic
since it is not practical to expect children below five years
of age to attend school. The school attendance rate among
children 5 to 14 years indicates that at age five the attendance
rate is minimal (see Figure 8.3) whereas it increases among
older children and reaches its peak at 9 years. Thereafter
it declines among older children.
Figure 8.3: Percentage of Children Attending School
by Age in AP, 2001
100.0
90.0
80.0
Percent
Education 101
In Mahabubnagar and Kurnool districts the percentages districts, the percentage varies between 70 and 80. The
are as low as 63.25 and 67.03 respectively. In all the pattern is similar for boys and girls.
other districts, the figure varies between 75 and 80. The
In rural schools, the gender disparity index10 in
pattern is similar for boys and girls attending to schools.
attendance is high in Mahabubnagar and Kurnool, but is
The gender disparity index in attendance is substantially
very low in East Godavari, West Godavari and Krishna.
higher in the low school attendance districts of Mahabubnagar
There are noticeable variations across districts in the levels
and Kurnool, but is very low in Hyderabad, East Godavari,
of school attendance for boys and girls in rural areas
West Godavari, Krishna, Rangareddi and Nellore. Inter-
whereas in urban areas there is little variation across districts.
district variations in the percentage of girls attending schools
However, inter- district variations in the gender disparity
are significantly higher than for boys. It should also be
index in attendance are very high in urban schools as
noted that inter-district variations in gender disparity index
well. Across the different social categories, the percentage
in attendance are also considerable.
of children in the age group 6-14 years attending to schools
in ST, SC and Other communities were about 64.13, 76.86
and 79.56 respectively during 2001.
8.3 Educational Attainment Index
A composite index has been constructed for 2001
to examine the relative positions of states with respect to
education attainment11 . The index consists of indicators
relating to levels of literacy and schooling. The index
values and relative position rankings show that while Kerala
was at the top of the list, Bihar was at the bottom. The
index value ranged from as high as 91.55 to 45.19 indicating
widespread regional disparities across states. The national
Rural-Urban Disparity average stood at 64.35.
The percentage of children in the age group 6-14 The index shows that Andhra Pradesh, with a rank
years attending school in rural Andhra Pradesh is 76.15 of 15, was one of the most backward states in terms of
and 82.76 in urban areas. The corresponding figures for educational attainment. Rajasthan, J&K, Uttar Pradesh,
boys and girls are about 80.45 and 71.61 respectively in Jharkand and Bihar had lower index values. Importantly,
rural Andhra Pradesh and about 83.53 and 81.97 respectively Orissa, a poverty-stricken state and Madhya Pradesh one
in urban areas, which show that the gender disparity index of the BiMaRU states, are ahead of Andhra Pradesh (see
in attendance is much lower in urban areas compared to Figure 8.5).
rural areas. The contribution of rural children to the total A similar composite index has been constructed across
children (6-14 age group) attending school is around 72 districts within Andhra Pradesh to identify the backward
per cent which is in fact below the share of the rural districts and the level of inter-district disparities. The index
children (75 percent) in total child population. values across the districts, ranging from 78.38 to 46.02
There are considerable variations in the percentage are within the range of values found across major Indian
of children in the age group 6-14 years attending schools states. No district of Andhra Pradesh is either as developed
across districts in rural areas. The percentage of children as Kerala or as backward as Bihar.
attending schools is more than 80 in districts such as
Karimnagar, Chittoor, Warangal, West Godavari, Kadapa, 10
The Gender Disparity Index is ratio of male to female in educational attainment.
Nellore and Krishna. In Mahabubnagar and Kurnool the 11
The index is based on both the adult literacy rate with two-third weight and
figures are as low as 60.85 and 65.42. In all the other children’s school attendance rate with one-third weight.
Chhattisgarh
India
Kerala
Tamilnadu
Madhya Pradesh
Uttaranchal
Punjab
Gujarat
Haryana
West Bengal
Karnataka
Orissa
Assam
Andhra Pradesh
Rajasthan
J&K
Uttar Pradesh
Jharkhand
Bihar
15 Statets Average
with rising expectations from parents about the quality
of schooling, and the general feeling that public schools
are not offering good quality education has led to an increasing
The regional disparities within the state across the demand for private schools. The failure of public schools
districts are quite revealing. Among the 23 districts in in maintaining quality is attributed to many factors from
the state, Hyderabad and Mahabubnagar were the most teachers to infrastructure. Because parents are interested
and the least developed in terms of educational attainment. in better quality, they prefer private schools if they can
Interestingly both districts are in Telangana. It is not unexpected afford it. If they cannot afford a private school some parents
that Hyderabad tops the list, as it is a totally urbanized prefer to keep send their children to work rather than to
district12 . After Hyderabad, almost all the districts from a public school.
the South Coastal Andhra region are at the top of the list. In Andhra Pradesh, the number of private schools
But the three least developed districts are from the three and enrolment in these schools has been increasing rapidly,
different regions (see Figure 8.6). especially since the 1990s. There were about 62000 primary
and 17000 upper primary schools in the state in 2005.
Figure 8.6: Educational Attainment Index across districts
Of these about 7000 primary and 5000 upper primary
of AP, 2001
schools are under private management, constituting 11
Mahabubnagar
Kurnool and 29 percent of the total primary and upper primary
Vizianagaram
Medak schools respectively. About 30 and 34 per cent of the
Adilabad children enrolled were in private primary and upper primary
Nizamabad
Srikakulam schools in 2005 (see Table 8.3). Private primary and upper
Anantapur
Karimnagar primary schools together account for about 15 per cent
Khammam
Prakasam of the total schools whereas their share in total enrolment
Nalgonda
Warangal is around 30 per cent. The intake capacity of the schools
Visakhapatnam under private management and the area they cater to seems
Guntur
Kadapa to be high. The large number of children enrolled per
East Godavari
Nellore private school when compared to a public school proves
Rangareddi
Chittoor this. Increasing demand for private educational institutions
Krishna
West Godavari is also very prominent in higher education, especially
Hyderabad technical education.
0 20 40 60 80
The emergence of private education underlines the
8.4 Growing Demand for Private Schools
dualism in the education system: poor public schools
The recent performance of the state has been more
promising. Demand for education has been increasing 13
As a matter of fact the increasing number of private schools indicates the
increasing demand for private schools. In Andhra Pradesh between 1987 and
12
Usually the urban areas are ahead of rural areas in any development param- 1993 the share of private schools in total schools at the upper primary level
eter as is the case with Hyderabad in educational attainment. increased from 16 per cent to around 33 per cent.
Education 103
Table 8.3: Percentage Distribution of Schools and Enrolment between 8.5.1 Access to Primary Education
Public (Govt.) and Private Management in A P
In fact, Andhra Pradesh is far better than the average
Stage/ Schools Enrolment
Indian state in respect of physical access to primary schools.
Magt 1970-71 1980-81 1993-94 2004-05 1970-71 1980-81 1993-94 2004-05
In the state, around 90 per cent of the population are
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
served by primary schools within their habitations (see
Primary
Table 8.4). Also, within the state, the differences in access
Public 94.3 94.2 92.6 88.6 90.9 90.7 86.7 69.5
Private 5.7 5.8 7.4 11.4 9.1 9.3 13.3 30.5 to primary schools across districts are not wide, and have
Upper Primary in fact been coming down over the past few decades.
Public 88.9 86.0 80.0 70.8 83.6 80.0 74.5 65.3 However, the availability of primary schools for children
Private 11.1 14.0 20.0 29.2 16.4 20.0 25.5 34.7 in habitations with very small population (of say below
Primary & Upper Primary 500) is not sufficient. Incidentally, these habitations
Public 93.9 93.4 91.2 84.8 89.5 88.0 83.7 68.0 predominantly have SC and ST inhabitants. The neglect
Private 6.1 6.6 8.8 15.2 10.5 12.0 16.3 32.0 of these habitations results in the exclusion of children
belonging to depressed communities from opportunities
Note : Magt – Management
for primary education. The intensity of neglect is the highest
Source : Statistical Abstracts of Andhra Pradesh.
for ST children. It was reported15 in 1989 that only 35
per cent of the habitations in the state with more than 50
and good quality private schools. The implication of this
per cent ST population had primary schools within their
is far-reaching. It leads to differentiation in employment
habitations. In 25 per cent of habitations children had to
opportunities and earning prospects in the labour market
walk up to 2 km and in 40 per cent they had to walk
where the system of education itself perpetuates the class
more than 3 Km to reach schools (GOAP, 1992).
system in society by which the instrumental characteristic
of education that it facilitates the economic mobility may
Table 8.4: Physical Access to School in A P - Percentage of Population
lose its rigour.
living in the Habitations which are Availing Schooling Facility
8.5 Supply Factors of Education Primary Upper Primary
Served within Served within
Although the demand for schooling is important, Survey Year Up to 3 Km.
Habitation Habitation
the supply factors have a potential capacity for generating
H P H P H P
more demand. The supply factors facilitate the realisation
1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10
of schooling14 .
I 1957 44.8 81.1 2.2 - - -
II 1965 60.8 90.7 6.1 25.7 - -
14
It is made possible in two ways - first, by meeting the manifest demand for
III 1973 61.1 87.5 9.3 31.3 47.4 64.6
schooling from parents who can not only afford it but who are also aware of
IV 1978 64.0 91.8 10.2 36.0 53.4 71.2
the value of education and are willing to send their children to school;
second, by transforming latent demand into manifest demand or by creating V 1986 67.8 93.3 13.5 40.7 63.5 79.2
demand. Latent demand indicates parents who are potential consumers of VI 1993 69.7 92.5 13.8 43.0 65.4 79.4
educational services but, who, owing either to lack of willingness or VII 2002 78.5 - 24.5 - - -
affordability or both, are not sending their children to school. Provision of
easy access (physical, economic and social) to school may encourage parents Note : 1.In first two surveys distance was measured in miles for
to send their children to school; but it is the quality of schooling that matters later surveys it was in kilometres; 2. H – Habitations Served;
in retaining children (throughout the completion of their schooling cycle) in P – Population served.
school, as either inadequate access or poor quality of schooling or both
Source : 1. Directorate of School Education, Hyderabad, Andhra
together may discourage manifest demand. Turning latent demand into manifest
Pradesh; 2. All India Educational Survey.
demand needs pro-active initiatives by educational service providers through
providing incentives and persuading and motivating parents (of school-age
15
children). This becomes a classic case of supply creating its own demand for Based on NSSO 44th Round (1988-89) A Report on Tribal Living Conditions
schooling. in Andhra Pradesh.
Education 105
Rationalisation of Schools also in place. Incentive schemes are intended to be an
On the one hand the Expert Group on elementary approach to motivate parents to send their wards to school
education recommends the expansion of schools and human and also to attract children to schools18 . Different types
resources, especially teachers. The government of Andhra of incentives like free education, free uniforms, free textbooks,
Pradesh, on the other, went in for rationalization by reversing scholarships, residential schools and mid-day meals are
this. It has been closing down some existing schools provided under the incentive schemes.
especially in the interior hamlets/villages, for the reason Though the Indian Constitution has endorsed the
that these schools are not viable because the number of view that elementary education should be free and
children enrolled in or attending these schools is not enough compulsory, the recent evidence shows that elementary
to run a school. The Government also sought rationalisation education, even at the lower primary level, is not provided
of teachers as some schools had teachers beyond the free of cost. Also it is observed that primary education
number needed, while those with good student strength
involves considerable cost and accounts for a significant
lacked teachers.
proportion of household expenditure. In Andhra Pradesh,
Since the inception of District Primary Education no (tuition) fee is collected from children attending schools
Programme (DPEP) with external aid, there was a significant at the primary or the middle levels, so that at least partially
increase in the number of new schools, especially primary the state is complying with the obligation of providing
schools. These schools started after 1995 number 17000 free elementary education. However, the expenditure incurred
and account for about 25 per cent of the total number of on uniforms and textbooks increases each year raising
primary schools in Andhra Pradesh. (DISE survey) Many the cost of schooling which may discourage parents, especially
of these primary schools, under the DPEP, were set up in poor parents, from sending their children to school. Hence,
interior villages which did not have a school. The idea the distribution of free uniforms and textbooks are essential
was to ensure that children did not have to walk far to go to motivate all children to attend school. Though scholarship
to school. However, attendance in these schools was not schemes were introduced as an incentive especially for
at the desired level. As a part of the rationalisation process,
the poor and SC/ST children, in reality, the distribution
the Education Department conducted a survey of these
of these incentives happens to be limited to certain schools
schools in 2005 and found that many schools had insufficient
and a few children19 .
student strength. Consequently, the government considered
that these schools had to be either merged with nearby The government of India introduced a nation-wide
schools or closed down completely. According to the mid-day meal scheme20 in 1995 following a Supreme
department officials, there are hardly 20 students in each
18
of these schools and there were schools with only 10 The principal purpose of incentives is to encourage children to participate
(enrolment and attendance) in the formal educational process.
children. According to a recent District Information on
19
It was observed that in 1993, the proportion of schools implementing the
School Education (DISE) Survey there were about 30000 scheme and the beneficiaries of schemes did not cross single digit figures
primary schools in Andhra Pradesh with 50 students or among enrolled children in primary or middle schools. In addition, the Residential
less and these schools are spread across all districts other School System was introduced during the 1980s especially for children belonging
than Hyderabad. All these schools, perhaps, will be subject to backward communities (SC, ST and OBC). In the majority of these schools,
the entry point was the middle level and pupils who crossed the primary level.
to the rationalization process going on in the state17 . Entry was determined on merit.
8.5.2 Supportive Programmes of the State: Incentives 20
There are three arguments for the noon-meal scheme. First, it motivates poor
parents to send their children to school and the children to stay in schools. It
Programmes to support and complement affirmative is expected thereby to improve the levels enrolment and retention. Second, it
actions of the state in the matter of child schooling are improves the nutrition level of school children provided the food supplied
has high nutrient value. The resulting improvement in the health of children
enables them to attend school regularly and enhances their learning capacity.
17
One of the reasons behind the poor attendance is migration; many hamlets Third, there is the socialisation argument that sitting together and sharing
had less than 50 families and in most cases the entire families had migrated to meals may help in eroding class barriers which are inherent in the Indian
urban areas in search of livelihood. social structure (see PROBE, 1999).
Education 107
Box 8.3: Teacher’s Absenteeism in India falls short of 50 per cent. It increased from 34 per cent in
Education is one of those areas where public service delivery is 1991 to 38 per cent in 2001 and further to 42 per cent in
undermined especially in many developing countries. Teachers who 200623 . The DISE data show that there are about 18000
are frontline service providers and critical in service (education) delivery, primary and another 2000 upper primary schools in the
are often absent from school. Another problem is that the presence of
state with at least two teachers but none of them is a
teachers per se does not ensure that they are working. The absence rate
based on direct physical verification of the teacher’s presence at their woman.
respective schools (randomly sampled) in India is as high as 25 percent
It must be noted that an improvement in TPR as
which one is of the highest rates among the developing countries. In
government-run schools only 45 per cent of teachers are engaged in such may not serve the purpose of attaining the goal of
teaching activity. It is observed that higher-ranking teachers like universal elementary education, unless those appointed
headmasters are more absent than the lower-ranking ones and male as teachers perform their duty. The attitude of teachers
teachers are absent more often than women teachers. The situation in
towards pupils, their motivation, functioning and attendance
Andhra Pradesh may be no better than in the country as a whole.
in schools is more important. Frequent absenteeism by
Source : Chaudhury et al (2006)
teachers, especially in public schools, is well recognised
all over the country and it is reported that it is very high
Usually the teacher-pupil ratio in practice is computed particularly in Andhra Pradesh.
for the enrolled children. The TPR will go up if all the
8.5.4 Physical Infrastructure
children of the elementary school age (i.e. 5-14 age group),
irrespective of their enrolment status are taken into account. Another factor that influences the quality of schooling
Schooling is one of the areas that require assured and is physical infrastructure. Lack of adequate physical facilities
adequate supply to accommodate all the potential students such as pucca buildings, blackboards, drinking water,
irrespective of their actual demand for schooling. The playgrounds and urinals has an adverse impact on attracting
supply of schooling should not depend on the manifest children to school as well as on the quality of schooling.
demand22 . When we take into account all the potential In India, despite achievement of satisfactory access to
school-going children, more teachers would be required. primary schools (within each habitation), the shortages
In addition, gender composition of the teaching staff of classrooms and teachers remain widespread. A large
is also an important issue. Lack of women teachers is number of schools are running with single rooms; some
one of the reasons given for the non-attendance of many schools do not have even a pucca room. Many classrooms
girl children in schools. In majority of the states, men are in a poor condition and many schools lack potable
outnumber women as teachers in schools, although the water supply and adequate sanitary facilities.
share of women teachers has increased greatly in recent The Seventh All-India Educational Survey (AIES), for
decades. It is also observed that there are more female 2002 reported that about four thousand primary schools
teachers than men only in urban areas and private (aided comprising around 7 per cent of the total primary schools
and unaided) schools, whereas teachers in rural schools (61,167) were running in the open in Andhra Pradesh.
and public schools on the whole are male. In Andhra Further, of the total primary schools about 17 per cent
Pradesh, since Independence there have always been more and about 10 per cent of the upper primary schools did
men than women teachers in primary schools. Although not have a pucca building. According to DISE 2006, there
the proportion of female teachers is increasing, it still was only one classroom in about 22000 primary schools,
or 33 per cent of the total, (see Table 8.6). The availability
Provision of schooling can be done in two ways - by adjusting supply to
22 of drinking water in schools is very poor, and about 28
manifest demand, or by ensuring supply irrespective of existing demand, but per cent of primary and 11 per cent of upper primary
aimed at increasing demand. The latter approach becomes relevant in the
schools did not provide drinking water. About 47 per
Indian context, in which the number of non-school going children is large,
and state policy aims at universal elementary education. cent of primary schools did not have any kind of toilets.
23
According to 2006 DISE data, for Andhra Pradesh. The situation is worse with respect to toilets for girls;
more than 70 per cent of schools did not have such a Figure 8.7: Percentage Share of Education Expenditure (Rev. A/
facility. C) in Total Expenditure (TE) and GSDP and Per Capita
Expenditure (1993-94 Prices) on Education (PCEE) in Andhra
With the introduction of the new education policy Pradesh
(1985), programmes like OBB, APPEP and DPEP were initiated 26
24
500
450
22
to make elementary education universal. These programmes
18 350
had focused on infrastructure, improving the quality of 16
14 % in GSDP
300
250
12 % in TE 200
schooling and involving the local community. However, 10 PCEE 150
8 100
they do not appear to have been effective in providing 6
4 50
2 0
the school infrastructure necessary to create a proper learning
1960-61
1962-63
1964-65
1966-67
1968-69
1970-71
1972-73
1974-75
1976-77
1978-79
1980-81
1982-83
1984-85
1986-87
1988-89
1990-91
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1998-99
2000-01
2002-03
2004-05
2006-07
environment. It is to be noted that the ineffective education
Year
system has a discouraging effect in terms of low enrolment
and high drop-out rates.
There has been a tremendous increase in expenditure
8.6 Financial Resources
on education in Andhra Pradesh since its formation in
It is the obligation of a welfare state to provide free 1956. It increased from Rs. 6.7 crores in 1956-57 to Rs.
and universal elementary education, and the progress 7074.6 crores in 2006-07, that is by about 1000 times.
achieved in expanding school enrolment depends upon But the impact of such an increase is nullified by inflation24 .
the amount spent and its distribution among the different In constant (1993-94) prices, the expenditure increased
types and levels of education. In 1960, the Kothari from Rs. 119.4 crores to Rs. 3566.3 crores during the
commission pointed out the inadequacy of the amount same period, by just about 29 times25 . Though per capita
spent on education and highlighted the need to spend at expenditure on education has increased over the period,
least 6 per cent of the GDP on education. The Commission the impact of population growth in addition to the rising
also pointed out that it was school education and especially
24
The impact of inflation is seen to be significant when we adjust the expenditure
primary education that had to be given top priority. So in current prices with GDP deflator.
far neither India as a whole nor any particular state, including 25
The growth in expenditure on education in constant prices is lower than in
Andhra Pradesh, has fulfilled this suggestion, with the current prices, indicating the rising impact of the level of price on the increasing
exception of Kerala and Himachal Pradesh. level of expenditure.
Education 109
prices has affected it26 . In current prices the per capita Commission (1964-68). It declined in the 1990s from its
expenditure on education has increased from Rs. 2/- in peak during the 1980s and remained between 2 to 3 percent
1956-57 to Rs. 844/- in 2006-07, whereas in constant till the recent budget (2007-08).
(1993-94) prices it increased from Rs. 36 to Rs. 440 (see
Box 8.4: Financing Child Education
Figure 8.8). The per capita expenditure on education in
Child education is an essential part of child well-being. For this
Andhra Pradesh grew at an increasing rate till the 1980s, purpose, the allocation of budget resources in Andhra Pradesh shows
but after that the percentage change over the period that the entire expenditure27 on child education (including elementary
decelerated especially during the 1990s. and secondary) constituted 2.74 per cent of the GSDP during the last
five years. Of this, 0.73 per cent is towards secondary education and
Figure 8.8: Per capita Real Expenditure (1993-94 Prices) on the remaining 2.01 per cent is on elementary education. The grants of
Education, Sports, Art and Culture in Southern States centrally sponsored schemes (CSS) such as DPEP, SSA, KGVB and NEPGL,
are not in fact reflected in the budget of the state government but reach
Andhra Pradesh Karnataka
the implementing authorities in the state. When accounted, the expenditure
700 Kerala Tamilnadu
through these grants constitutes 0.21 per cent. It indicates that in the
Per Capita Exp. on Ed.
600
500 absence of CSS funds, the state government expenditure on elementary
400
(in Rs.)
48.0
46.0
44.0 was unfavourable for elementary education and the share
42.0
40.0 of elementary education in total expenditure on education
1956-57
1958-59
1960-61
1962-63
1964-65
1966-67
1968-69
1970-71
1972-73
1974-75
1976-77
1978-79
1980-81
1982-83
1984-85
1986-87
1988-89
1990-91
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1999-2000
2001-02
2003-04
2005-06
2007-08
27
Including expenditure through grants of Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS).
28
About 95 per cent of the current expenditure is spent on salaries, and the rest
26
Though both the total expenditure and expenditure on education have on teaching materials, equipment and maintenance. Capital expenditure on
been increasing, the rate of increase has been higher for the former. education is negligible (World Bank, 1997b).
Education 111
ANDHRA PRADESH
LITERATES - 2001
>50
40-50
30-40
<30
>20
15-20
10-15
<10
3
For this purpose the following indicators are used in the Gender Gap Report
of WEF: i) number of days/weeks paid maternity leave allowed; ii) maternity
leave benefits (percentage of wages paid in covered period); iii) female professional compared with the situation in the early 1990s. Women
and technical workers (as a percentage of total); iv) availability of government
provided childcare; v) impact of maternity laws on the hiring of women; and workers gained in terms of regular wage/salaried employment
vi) equality between women and men for private sector employment. and self-employment between 1993-94 and 2004-05.
The discrimination against women engaged in the This indicates that the sex ratio, which was in fact against
labour market with respect to wages is a universal females, was relatively lower for workers than the general
phenomenon. This discrimination is visible in all kinds population. Among workers, the sex ratio for those engaged
of work, whether regular wage/salaried or casual. The in non-agricultural activities is more unfavourable to female
average female wage rate in India as well as in Andhra workers. Moreover, while the sex ratio in the general
Pradesh, in paid ‘public works’ programmes is also lower population has increased between 1993-94 and 2004-
than for men. The average wage rate, in any kind of work, 05, the sex ratio has declined among workers in general
in Andhra Pradesh is lower than the all-India average. and in non-agriculture in particular. The sex ratio is higher
However, the difference between male and female workers among casual labourers than the self-employed. In regular
is relatively lower than at the all-India level. wage work, the sex ratio is abysmal.
According to the 2001 Census the total population Further, the employment of women in the emerging
of the state of Andhra Pradesh was about 76.2 million and fast growing sector like information technology (IT)
(55.4 rural and 20.8 urban), and the number of women is far behind that of men in general. In the IT sector in
was 37.6 million (27.4 m. rural and 10.2 m. urban) constituting Andhra Pradesh, which is one of the few states with a
49.4 per cent. For 2005 the total population is estimated significant share of IT sector in India, the number of women
at 79.7 (57.8 and 21.9) million and the number of women employed is much behind the number of men when
at 39.5 (28.7 and 10.8) million. compared with the all-India average as well as the other
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Karnataka
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Orissa
Chattisgarh
Assam
Bihar
Punjab
Rajasthan
Jharkand
Uttaranchal
Kerala
All India
West Bengal
Andhra Prdesh
Gujarat
Tamilnadu
Uttar Pradesh
80 40
Voilence Rate
Percentage
60 30
Private Space
40 Public Space 20
Violence Rate
20 10
0 0 But the state has the highest incidence of violence
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
children under 5 years and 600,000 women die each Pradesh has improved over time, child health in the state
year, mostly in the developing world. One million newborn is not fully secured.
babies never survive beyond 24 hours. These figures are
Child survival is threatened by infant mortality. In
quite shocking. Survival itself is a major problem for a
Andhra Pradesh, according to NFHS III (2005-06), the
child and many of those who survive are deprived of
infant mortality rate at 53 (per 1000 live births) indicates
disease-free healthy life and appropriate education.
that one baby in every 19 live births dies before its first
Unfortunately such deprivation is very common in India.
birthday. About three-fourths of IMR is contributed by
Children in Andhra Pradesh are not an exception to such
neonatal mortality (i.e. in the first month of the life). In
deprivations which is why overall child development is
terms of child survival Andhra Pradesh is lagging behind
poor in Andhra Pradesh, as seen in the low value of the
the other southern states, especially Kerala and Tamilnadu.
Child Development Index.
Child schooling is another important aspect of child
Well-being means that children have the capabilities
well-being. Both pre-school and school education is critical
or the strengths to undertake and perform activities or
in the child’s cognitive growth. The performance of the
enter into successful relationships that are appropriate
state in terms of child schooling has already been discussed
for their age and level of development. These abilities
in chapter 8 (Education). It indicates that though the state
and strengths include physical health7 and development,
has been doing well since the 1990s it fell short of the
appropriate social and emotional functioning, and cognitive
goal i.e. universal elementary education. There are still
growth. Safe motherhood (during pregnancy and after
10 to 12 lakh children in the age group 6 to 14 years
birth) is one of most important aspects that affect child
who are not in school. Moreover the quality of schooling
health. Another important aspect is safe childhood that
includes breastfeeding, immunization which prevents is a cause of concern in the state.
childhood disease and the timely treatment of other illness, Infants and young children are completely dependent
and nutrition level. Though the performance of Andhra upon parents and caregivers to achieve physical well-
being. The socio-economic conditions at the household
7
Good nutrition, preventive health care, physical activity, safety and security,
substance abuse prevention, and reproductive health are the key components
level definitely influence physical well-being of children.
of physical well-being that children need to survive and thrive. But children living in rural areas, and belonging to socially
Urban
Total
Rural
Urban
Total
Rural
Urban
Total
Rural
Urban
Total
8
Since Independence, there were several measures to improve child health
0 to 5 Age 6 to 14 Age and education while increasing the coverage of related services. In the process,
Other age All Ages
group the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) was initiated in 1976 at the
national level and in Andhra Pradesh. Under the ICDS programme, anganwadi
Early childhood care and education (ECE) are very centres (AWC) were established to provide children with health, nutrition and
important. Access to ECE is important not only in preparing pre-school education services from birth to six years and nutritional and
a child to enter school but equally or more important in health services to pregnant and breastfeeding mothers.
Percent ST Population to
total population
>80.0
60.0-80.0
40.1-60.0
25.1-40.0
10.1-25.0
5.1-10.0
<5.0
Percent SC Population to
total population
>30
20-30
10-20
5-10
<5
children are the most deprived. This is corroborated even Source: NSS 61st Round (2004-05) Employment and Unemployment Survey
by enrolment figures provided by the Education Department
Inter-district variations in attendance are much higher
(usually suspected of being inflated) and poor enrolment
for girls than for boys among ST and SC communities. In
and high drop-out rates were highest among ST children
the case of ST, the low attendance districts are Mahabubnagar,
followed by SC and ‘others’.
Medak, Guntur and Rangareddi. The gender disparity in
Table 10.3: Percentage of Out-of-School Children Across Social attendance is also relatively higher in these districts except
Groups: A P for Guntur. For SC and Others, the low attendance districts
Location Year SC ST Others are Mahabubnagar and Kurnool, where gender disparity
1 2 3 4 5 in attendance is also higher.
Total 1981 63.8 80.6 57.3
Rural-urban differentials in the school attendance
1991 59.8 73.9 46.9
of children are higher for ST compared to other social
2001 23.1 35.9 20.4
categories. Further, the attendance of ST girls is pathetically
Rural 1981 68.1 82.2 63.8
low in the rural areas of Mahabubnagar, Medak, Nizamabad,
1991 64.4 76.0 53.0
Rangareddi, Guntur and Nalgonda. For ST children, the
2001 24.2 36.8 21.9
low attendance (less than 20) districts are Nellore,
Urban 1981 41.1 56.3 38.2
Mahabubnagar and Prakasam. The inter-district variations
1991 39.0 51.7 32.5
in attendance are much higher for ST (also SC and Others)
2001 17.8 25.3 16.9
girls in the rural areas than for boys. We do not find any
Note : 1. Figures presented in percentage. 2. Children of 5-14 years of age.
such difference in urban areas. For children of SC and
Source : 1. Census 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Others communities, the low attendance districts in the
A recent estimate3 based on NSS 61st (2004-05) round, rural areas are Mahabubnagar and Kurnool.
indicates that the performance of the state among major 10.3 Health
3
Health status is measured by indictors such as mortality,
As per the estimations using unit level record data of NSS Employment and
Unemployment Survey 61st round (2004-05). It is based on usual activity morbidity, immunization of children and pregnant women
(both principal and subsidiary) status. and their nutrition levels. The estimates for all these indicators
4
Under the Minimum Needs Programme, at the national level, 14,723 Sub-Centres, 4,301 Primary Health Centres and 292 Community Health Centres have
been established in Scheduled Caste Bastis/Villages with 20 per cent or more Scheduled Castes population, besides 558 Allopathic Hospitals/Dispensaries.
Note : 1. Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status; 2. Figure in parenthesis includes both OBC and Other and that is comparable with
those of the ‘other’ in 1993-94.
Source : Estimations using NSS 61st and 50th Round Employment and Unemployment survey raw data.
especially ST depending on agricultural labour increased, of other inputs for cultivation to improve the productivity
which indicates the worsening situation for ST in Andhra of land. But to what extent have these disadvantaged groups
Pradesh. gained access to these agricultural inputs? For instance,
Since Independence, the Indian state has considered the access to irrigation, which is considered a leading
that problems of land are of pressing urgency. The objective input for cultivation, is inadequate for SC and ST. The
of poverty eradication envisaged progress on two fronts percentage of population in households with irrigated
simultaneously, high productivity and equitable distribution. land is the lowest among SC (13.5 per cent) followed by
Accordingly, land reforms were introduced to mitigate ST (21.7 per cent) when compared to the ‘other’ community
land-related problems like concentration, tenancy rights, (30.6) and the state average (22.9 per cent). Availability
and land for the landless. Because of the severe disadvantage of other necessary inputs would also be inadequate for
suffered by the SC and ST, these communities were targeted SC and ST.
while distributing surplus land in India and Andhra Pradesh
so that they gained access to land. But land reform has We now turn to a further analysis of the data relating
to be more than the mere redistribution of land to the to the number of holdings and operated areas across social
landless. It is equally important to ensure the availability groups based on the Agricultural Census. It indicates that
there has been an increase in the number of holdings
Table 10.8: Percentage of Population who Owned or Possessed
any land or Land Cultivated: Rural A P and area operated by the SC and ST during the last decade
Land 2004-05 1993-94 (between 1995-96 and 2005-06) (Table 10.9). But this
Ownership ST SC OBC Others Total ST SC Others Total increase in the number of holdings and area operated
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 for the ST and SC may not be due to land distribution as
Owned 89.5 93.0 91.6 90.48 91.4 84.5 96.1 92.6 92.5 a part of land reforms. In the changing dynamics of the
(91.2) rural economy in Andhra Pradesh, land transfers have
Possessed 97.3 97.8 98.9 99.08 98.6 93.2 88.8 91.4 91.1
been taking place, horizontally (within a socio-economic
(99.0)
class) and vertically (across social and economic classes).
Cultivated 54.5 33.0 47.1 51.92 46.2 70.4 45.4 58.1 56.7
(48.7) It is observed that land owned by the dominant cultivating
Irrigated 21.7 13.5 23.1 30.6 22.9 - - - - castes has declined because they are moving out of rural
Note : 1. Figure in parenthesis includes both OBC and Other and that is
areas and agricultural activities to urban areas and non-
comparable with those of the ‘other’ in 1993-94. agricultural activities. There is a corresponding increase
Source : NSSO, 50th (1993-94) and 61st (2004-05) Round. in the control of land by backward communities (Reddy,
Marginal
Semimaed
Large
Small
Semimed
Large
Medium
Margianal
Small
Medium
other social group. The situation seems relatively better
for the ST as their share in operated area is the same as
their share in total population (around 8 per cent) (Table Number of Holdings Area Operated
10.9).
Table 10.9: Number of Holding and Area Operated across On the whole, it may be mentioned that access to
Social Groups in A P land is still denied to many SCs. As a result, a majority
Social Holdings Area Average Size of them continue to be landless agricultural labourers.
Group 1995-96 2005-06 1995-96 2005-06 1995-96 2005-06 Further, since most families who own land, especially
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SCs, are small and marginal farmers, their capacity to
SC 12.85 14.22 10.66 11.36 0.83 0.80 invest in agriculture is very inadequate and their access
(12.1) (11.8) (7.4) (7.8) to credit is negligible. Although STs are relatively better
ST 7.54 9.27 10.87 12.12 1.44 1.31 placed in terms of access to land, factors such as traditional
(7.1) (7.7) (7.6) (8.4) cultivation techniques and lack of access to modern
Others 85.64 96.95 122.20 121.41 1.43 1.25 technology and inputs including credit, undermines their
(80.8) (80.5) (85.0) (83.8) economic progress.
All 106.03 120.44 143.73 144.89 1.36 1.20 10.6 Income Poverty
(100) (100) (100) (100)
Income poverty is only one of the multiple deprivations
Note : 1. Holdings are in lakhs and Area in lakh hectares;
2. Figures in parenthesis are percentages of respective that the SC and ST have continuously suffered, even after
social group in the total. nearly six decades of development planning. Across social
Source : Agricultural Census, DES, Hyderabad.
Figure 10.3: Mean Consumption Expenditure Across Social Of the total twenty six thousand villages in Andhra
Groups in Andhra Pradesh Pradesh, in 9 percent the entire population was STs. About
20 percent of the villages were predominantly (i.e. 50
1200 SC per cent or more) inhabited by STs and another 3 per
Mean Consp. Expr. (in Rs.)
ST
1000 Others All
cent by the SCs. Together, these 23 percent villages account
800 for about 7.2 percent of the total rural population in the
600 state. About 5 percent of the total SCs and about 45 per
400 cent of STs population in rural Andhra Pradesh were located
in villages which were predominantly inhabited by SCs
200
and STs.
0
1983 1993-94 2004-05 1983 1993-94 2004-05 In these villages the availability of basic infrastructure
Rural Urban and access to facilities is relatively poor when compared
to the ‘other’ villages (Table 10.10) and the people living
The head count ratio of poverty measured using NSS
Consumption Expenditure Survey data also shows that
Table 10.10: Access to Basic Infrastructure in A P: Percentage of
the percentage of poor is much higher among the SC/STs
Villages Predominantly Inhabited by SC and ST, having
community indicating wide disparities across social groups
Facility - 2001
in the state (Figure 10.4). Moreover, the disparity, especially
Facility SC ST Others All
between STs and ‘others’, has been increasing. Although,
1 2 3 4 5 6
the overall poverty ratio and the ratio among SCs and
1 Education 93.3 80.5 98.0 94.4
Figure 10.4: Head Count Ratio of Poverty Across Social Groups in AP 2 Medical 34.3 51.9 63.9 60.6
3 Tap Water 44.4 8.4 60.1 49.4
60 4 Post Office 28.4 14.5 62.4 51.9
50 ST SC 5 Phone Connection 39.0 8.5 59.0 48.4
40 Others All
6 Transportation 68.7 26.3 84.0 72.2
HCR
households did not have electricity connection in 2001. was abolished and forbidden in any form under Article
The percentage of households without electricity is highest 17 of the Constitution of India, the practice of “untouchability”
among STs (64.6 per cent) followed by SCs (50.5 per cent), – the imposition of social disabilities on persons by reason
and is higher in rural areas than in urban areas across of birth into a particular caste – has continued in one
social groups. form or the other. A Parliamentary Standing Committee8
noted that “generally SC/ST people avoided to report crimes
More than 60 per cent of the STs and SCs households
and fight cases just to escape police harassment and fear
live in a single room and about 3 to 4 per cent do not
of cases languishing in courts for long.” This Committee,
have even that single room. Access to safe drinking water
since its inception in 1968, has presented to Parliament
is extremely important for better health and higher human
as many as 176 Original Reports and 169 Action Taken
development. But, 52 per cent of the households in general
Reports till 2004. In addition, 191 Reports on the Study
and about 76 and 54 per cent of STs and SCs households
do not have tap water (which is considered safe drinking 8
Committee on the Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (2004-
water). The situation with regard to access to other basic 2005) Fourth Report.
13
In 1995-96 Social Welfare Budget allocation was 8.4 per cent of the total
12
Sukhadeo Thorat and S. Venkatesan, Caste Conflict, Poverty and Human plan outlay and this declined to 2.4 per cent in 2002-03. In 1999-00 and
Development in India, Indian Institute of Dalit Studies. New Delhi, 2004. 2000-01 the percentage allocations were 0.7 and 1.5 per cent respectively.
Environment 145
to achieving the goals of human development1 . In fact, to about 37 percent during the triennium ending 2004-
one of the Millennium Development Goals set by the 05. The decline in net area sown has been accompanied
United Nations is ensuring environmental sustainability. by a marginal increase in cultivable waste, fallow land
The objectives of this goal are to integrate the principles and land put to non-agricultural uses. During this period,
of sustainable development into country policies and not only has the pressure on land resources increased as
programs and reverse the loss of environmental is evident from the declining per capita availability of
resources, reduce the proportion of people without land from 0.235 to 0.205 ha, but the area of under-utilized
sustainable access to safe drinking water and sanitation land has also increased. The increase in under-utilized
by half by 2015 and achieve significant improvement in land2 (the difference between the total cultivable area,
the life of slum dwellers (HDR, 2005). and net area sown), from 28 per cent of the total cultivable
Keeping in view the importance of environmental area to about 33 per cent during this period is a cause of
factors in enhancing the quality of life the broad objective serious concern in the state.
of this chapter is to review the status of natural resources
that affect income and security as well as the environmental
conditions that affect the health of households in Andhra
Pradesh at the state, regional or district levels. Further, a
composite environmental index based on district level
indicators is constructed for the purpose of ranking the
districts on the basis of natural resource base and
environmental health/quality.
11.1 Natural Resources Base
11.1.a Land and Soil Resources
The state of Andhra Pradesh has a geographical area
of 27.44 million hectares and three climatic zones classified
Along with quantitative aspects, qualitative aspects
as arid, semi-arid and sub-humid. The state has seven
are also important in assessing the natural resource base.
agro-climatic zones based on the range of rainfall received,
The NRSA estimates that almost 19221.93 sq.km of land
type and topography of soils. The average annual rainfall
in the state, which is about 7 per cent of the total geographical
received in the state ranges from 500-750 mm in the
Scarce Rain fall Zone to about 900-1500 mm in the North area and 12.31 per cent of the cultivable area, is categorized
Telangana region. as degraded3 and that 45627.15 sq.kms are total wastelands4
(NRSA, 2005). The total wasteland, which is roughly 29
There have been marginal changes in the land use per cent of the total cultivable area, has in fact increased
pattern in Andhra Pradesh over the last few years. The when compared to the 1995 figures of 22 per cent. When
total cultivable area, which includes net area sown, current we take a closer look at the quantitative and qualitative
fallow, fallow other than current fallow and cultivable
waste is around 15.60 million hectares or 57 per cent of 2
Although underutilized land includes Current Fallow, Other Fallow, Cultivable
the total geographical area. While this area has remained Waste and Grazing Land and Pastures, following Reddy, et al. (2005), only the
unchanged over the years, the net area sown has declined first three categories have been considered as under-utilized land in this paper.
Environment 147
Common Property Resources across various districts in Andhra Pradesh points to some
interesting conclusions. It is seen that there is a
Common property resources (CPRs) play an important
complementarity between private property and common
role in the life and economy of the rural population6 .
property land resources for which the estimated correlation
The NSSO7 estimates that almost 15 per cent of the total
coefficient9 is found to be 0.6 and significant at 1 per
geographical area in India comes under the category of
cent level. The correlation coefficient between under-utilized
common property land resources, at .06 ha per capita
land and common property land is 0.7 and that between
and 0.31 ha per household. In Andhra Pradesh, however,
under-utilized land and private property land is 0.910.
only 9 per cent of the geographical area is categorized
The positive correlation coefficients with high values indicate
as common property land resources and the availability
that if the objective is to bring down the area of under-
per household is about 0.17 ha which is lower than the
national average. However the dependence on CPRs, utilized land then attention has to be given to both common
especially for fuel wood, is high in Andhra Pradesh. property and private property land resources instead of
focusing on only one.
A classification of land utilization pattern shows that
the percentage of CPRs8 to total geographical area across 11.1.b Water Resources
districts ranges from 21 per cent in Nellore to one per The Water Conservation Mission of Andhra Pradesh
cent in Srikakulam whereas for the state as a whole it is has estimated the water resources (surface and groundwater)
10.54 per cent. The districts with a relatively larger area to be 108.15 BCM (3820 TMC), of which 62.29 BCM
under CPRs are Nalgonda (19 per cent), Ranga Reddy (2200 TMC) are currently being utilized for drinking,
(17 per cent), Warangal (16 per cent) and Prakasam (15 agriculture and power generation. According to the Mission,
per cent). The proportion of CPRs in the districts of Coastal the per capita annual water resources are about 1400
Andhra is relatively low. In per capita terms, the availability CM, and utilization is about 800 CM. The current percentage
of CPRs ranges from 0.002 ha in Srikakulam to about of withdrawal of water in Andhra Pradesh is 58 per cent
0.10 ha in Nellore. For the state as a whole, the per capita and it is identified as a water scarce region11 (EPTRI, 2003).
availability of CPRs is 0.04 ha. Irrigation alone consumes more than 70 per cent of the
Linkage between private property, common property and water utilized but this still falls short of the needs.
underutilized land in AP Irrigation development as well as management is of
The system of utilization of common and private utmost importance in Andhra Pradesh. The percentage
property has evolved over centuries. A correlation analysis of net irrigated area to net sown area was 36 percent
of the relationship between private property resources during the triennium ending 2004-05 and had declined
(which include operational holdings and current fallows) by one percentage point since the triennium ending 1991-
and common property resources (which include cultivable 92. More importantly, almost six districts in the Coastal
waste, pastures and grazing land, and other fallow lands) Andhra region registered a decline in the percentage of
6
net irrigated area. Kadapa and Chittooor in the Rayalseema
Common property resources (CPRs) have been defined in a number of
alternative ways in the literature. region however recorded a slight increase in the area
7
The National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) 54th round surveyed the
common property resources in India. According to the NSSO the CPRs include 9
Although the correlation coefficient is marginally lower than the all India
village pastures and grazing grounds, village forests and wood lots, protected figure of 0.8 estimated by Kadekodi (2001).
and unclassed government forests, wastelands, common threshing grounds, 10
The partial correlation coefficients, in the first case controlling for private
watershed drainage, ponds and tanks, rivers, rivulets, water reservoirs, canals
property land and in the second case controlling for common property land
and irrigation channels (NSSO 2000).
resources have been compared with the original bivariate correlation and the
8
Since we do not have information on CPRs from NSSO at the district level,
inference is that the control variables have no effect, thereby ruling out the
we have tried to estimate the extent of CPRs from land use statistics given in
possibility of a spurious correlation.
the Statistical Abstract of Andhra Pradesh. In this alternative definition, CPRs
11
include cultivable waste, other fallows, and pastures and grazing land (Kadekodi, As per the UN indicator if the percentage of withdrawal is more than 40 per
2001). cent the country or region is considered as water scarce.
Environment 149
category in the state. Although the contribution of forestry shows that open and dense forest comprises only 16.15
to GDP is meager at one per cent (in 2001), this ignores per cent of the total geographical area of the state. The
the contribution of non-marketed benefits such as subsistence forest area in the state recorded a marginal increase (from
fuel wood, fodder and many other non-timber forest products. 43290 to 44637 sq.km) during 1997-2001 but has declined
In Andhra Pradesh, the recorded forest area is about 63814 since 2001, and was 44419 sq.kms in 2003 (a marginal
sq kms or 23 per cent of the total geographical area. Although decline of 218 sq.kms). During this period (1997-2001)
this is close to the national average in percentage terms, the districts in which forest area increased to a considerable
it is still far below the required minimum (33 per cent) extent were Chittoor (209 sq.km), Guntur (114 sq.kms)
for maintaining the ecological balance. The reserved and
and Vizianagaram (110 sq.kms). Between 2001 and 2003,
protected forests are 50479 (79 per cent) and 12365 sq.
in almost 11 districts forest area declined, including some
kms (19 per cent) respectively and the remaining are
districts like Guntur and Chitoor which had showed
unclassified forests. One-fourth of the actual forest cover
improvements in the previous assessment. While in Warangal
in the state is in Khammam and Adilabad districts, which
and Guntur districts forest area declined by 126 sq.kms,
incidentally have the highest percentage of area under
legally designated forests in the state. In Khammam about districts like Prakasam (100 sq. km) have recorded a marginal
53 per cent of the geographical area is under forest, and increase in forest area during this period (2001-2003).
in Adilabad, 44.84 per cent. These districts contribute Qualitative changes are also very important. The NRSA
respectively 13 and 11 per cent to the total area under (2005) has reported that the degradation of forests is very
forests in the state. The per capita availability of forest high in some districts in the state. The percentage of degraded
area is also very high in Khammam (0.38 ha) and Adilabad forest, which was around 38 per cent during 1995 in
(0.35 ha) districts, which is well above the state average Andhra Pradesh, had declined to about 31.5 per cent by
(0.1 ha). 2005. However, the decline during 1995-2000 was more
However, forests were depleted both in extent and than the decline during 2000-2005. In districts like East
quality in the state during the eighties and nineties when Godavari, West Godavari, Mahabubnagar, Kadapa,
compared to the 1970s. According to some estimates Anantapur and Kurnool, the percentage of degraded forests
about 41 per cent of the forest cover in India has been actually increased between 1995 and 2005. In some districts,
degraded to some degree. It is claimed that 78 per cent although the percentage of degraded forest area initially
of the forest is subject to heavy grazing and the domestic showed a decline until 2000, a reversal of the trend was
demand for timber and fuel wood is very high. About 50 visible in 200514 .
per cent of the forest is said to be at risk from forest fires
(World Bank, 2001). The assessment of forests by the Participatory forest management15 has been under
Forest Survey of India in 2003 based on satellite imageries implementation in the state since 1992. It began as Joint
14
For example, in Nellore about 18 per cent of its geographical area is
designated as forest; the percentage of degraded forest in the district, which
was 71 per cent in 1995 declined sharply to 33 per cent by 2000 before
increasing to 60 per cent.
15
It is being implemented through village level organizations called Vana
Samrakshana Samithis (VSS) and Eco Development Committees (EDC). Joint
forest management combining a strategy of production, improvement and
development of forests with the involvement of local communities organized
into VSS was more of a partnership between the forest dependent communities
and the government. On the other hand, CFM is intended to be a democratic
process through delegation of decision-making and aims at decentralizing the
entire process of planning and implementation, with the state forest department/
government acting as facilitator and provider of technical and infrastructure
support. The primary concern of CFM is poverty alleviation through forest
development.
High >15,000
12,000-15,000
Medium 10,000 - 12,000
< 10,000
Low
Environment 151
of livestock is moving in favor of small ruminants (sheep 11.1.f Mines and Minerals
and goat). Between 1987 and 1999 small ruminants increased
Mineral resources are among the core inputs for
in number across most districts in the state, although the
industrial development. Andhra Pradesh is the second
increase was more in some districts in Telangana and
largest storehouse of mineral resources17 in India. The
Rayalseema. In a few districts like Mahabubnagar, Anantapur
state stands second in the production of mica mainly
and Kadapa, the small ruminants outnumbered the total
found in Nellore and Visakhapatnam districts. The single
bovines16 .
largest deposit of barytes (with an estimate reserve of 70
11.1.e Fisheries and Coastal Resources million tonnes of grey barytes) in the world is in Kadapa
Andhra Pradesh is an important maritime state. It district 18 . Beach sands are found all along the coastal
has a coastline of 974 km, and a continental shelf of stretch from Srikakulam to Prakasam districts and also
3.30 million hectares and has more than 500 landing along the Godavari, Krishna, Nagavalli and Vamsadara
centres. Despite the long coastline, the share of seawater river channels. Andhra Pradesh has the second richest
fish in total fish production is lower than of freshwater bauxite deposit in the country with reserves of 750 million
fish. Although seawater fish production increased from tonnes (30 per cent of all India reserves) of metal grade
1.5 lakh tonnes in 1994-95 to 2.6 lakh tonnes in 2003- bauxite in Visakhapatnam and East Godavari districts.
04, the catch per unit of effort in respect of several Coal reserves of 14021.50 million tonnes are found over
commercially important species like elasmobranches, ribbon large tracts of Adilabad, Karimnagar, Khammam and
Warangal districts. Dolomite is found in Khammam, Kurnool,
fish, catfish, carangids and penaeid shrimps is very low
Anantapur, Warangal and Kadapa districts. Manganese
in the state. The fishery potential of North Coastal Andhra
ore with an estimated reserve of 7.5 million tonnes of
in the depth zone of 50-100 M appeared to be greater
low-grade manganese is found in Vizianagaram, Srikakulam,
and the maximum catch is from this zone. The traditional
Adilabad and Prakasam districts.
fishing grounds (15-25 M) have been showing a declining
trend (EPTRI 2003). Between 1993-94 and 2003-04 Over 16 per cent of the diamond reserves in the
freshwater fish production increased from 1.95 lakh tonnes country are in Andhra Pradesh. Tungsten, which is useful
to 6.5 lakh. In districts like Krishna, Nellore, Kurnool in alloys and electronics, is mostly found in East and
and Khammam, freshwater fish production has increased West Godavari districts with nearly 30 per cent of the
greatly but there has been a sharp decline in districts tungsten reserves in India. Rich reserves of natural gas
have been also discovered in the state recently. With
like Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam and Chittoor. The
continuous surveys and offshore exploration for gas in
expansion of aquaculture in a state, where the monthly
KG Basin, the discovery of 9 trillion cubic feet (tcft) of
per capita consumption of fish is only 0.11 kgs in rural
gas reserves, the biggest gas find in India in three decades,
and 0.08 kgs in urban areas, was initially to cater to the
was made by the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) in October,
demand from North Eastern states and later for exports.
2002 in deep waters, 150 Kms off the Andhra Pradesh
The spread of aquaculture has had adverse environmental
coast near Kakinada. The wide variety of minerals produced
and social implications. In several areas the conversion
in the state is being traded or utilised in several industries
of farmlands for aquaculture has seriously affected the
like power, metals, alloys, cement, chemicals, paint,
groundwater resources. The effluents from the fishponds
cosmetics, glass, ceramics, refractory, refinery etc.
let into the sea without any treatment is also adversely
affecting the coastal ecosystem (EPTRI, 2003).
17
A total of 48 minerals were located with vast resources of coal, limestone,
16
It is often argued that the presence of small ruminants is one of the causes slabs, etc. and good resources of oil and natural gas, manganese, asbestos,
of pastureland degradation. However, based on micro evidence it has been iron ore, ball clay, gold, diamonds, graphite, dolomite, quartz, tungsten,
argued that the shift to small ruminants is a result of degraded commons, as stetatic, feldspar, sand etc. which could be exploited.
they can survive in such environments (Reddy, 1999). 18
See (www.apind.gov.in)
Environment 153
11.2.b Sanitation facilities areas, in Hyderabad it is about 94 per cent followed by
Karimnagar (86 per cent) whereas Srikakulam has the
Access to sanitation facilities, which is an important
intermediate environmental health indicator, is distressingly lowest.
low in Andhra Pradesh. Data from the 2001 Census The provision of drainage facilities in the state is
show that nearly 67 per cent of the households in the also very inadequate. Nearly half the households in the
state do not have latrines within the house. Of the households state do not have any drainage facilities. In Hyderabad
which have sanitation facilities, only 18 per cent have over 90 per cent of the households are connected to closed
water closet facilities while 8.5 per cent of the households drains, but in other parts, around 38 per cent of the
use pit latrines and 6.32 per cent use other types of latrines. households with drainage are connected only to open
The rural-urban differences in sanitation facilities are drains.
considerable. While among the urban households only
11.2.c Indoor Pollution
about 22 per cent do not have latrines in their houses, it
is as high as 82 per cent among rural households23 . Solid biomass fuels which are used mostly in traditional
stoves in households, which also rarely have adequate
The situation is slightly better in the rural areas of a
ventilation, emit smoke containing quantities of harmful
few of the coastal districts like Krishna, East Godavari
pollutants in the immediate proximity of people leading
and West Godavari despite the fact that even in these
to serious health consequences (World Bank, 2002). It is
districts, about 70 per cent of the households do not have
observed that the concentration of suspended particulate
latrines. However, inter-district variations for rural areas
matter (SPM) during a cooking session is 3-6 mg/m3 and
are low in terms of non-availability of sanitation facilities.
CO is 5-50 PPM (parts per million). The exposure of human
In urban areas, as expected, Hyderabad is an exception
beings to total suspended particulate (TSP) in India is
where more than 90 per cent of households have sanitation
well above the prescribed limits. Women and children
facilities. Among other districts, the coverage is better in
are the worst affected from indoor pollution24 . According
Ranga Reddy and Krishna districts where only 12 and
to the NSSO 55th round almost 76 per cent of rural households
14 per cent of the households do not have sanitation
in India and 87 per cent of rural households in Andhra
facilities. But in districts like Vizianagaram, Adilabad and
Pradesh rely on firewood and chips for fuel.
Srikakulam, the percentage of households without any
sanitation facility is as high as 40 per cent. Across regions, Nearly 50 per cent of the total households in Andhra
Rayalseema has the maximum number of households Pradesh do not have a separate kitchen within the house
without latrines in both urban and rural areas. (2001 Census). The rural-urban differences (41 per cent
for rural and 75 per cent for urban areas) are more striking
About 40 per cent (6.7 m households) in the state
than variations across districts. Households without a
have bathrooms within the house. The coverage is as
separate kitchen inside the house and households who
low as 12.63 per cent in Srikakulam and 18.60 per cent
cook in the open are as many as 30 per cent each in
in Vizianagaram. In rural areas, there is a bathroom in
rural areas. The corresponding figures in urban areas are
the house in about 27 per cent of the households whereas
only 16 and 9 per cent. In addition to not having a separate
this is so in about 78 per cent of households in urban
kitchen, more than 70 per cent of the households in the
areas. In rural areas the coverage ranges from 8.35 per
rural areas of the majority of districts use solid fuels for
cent in Srikakulam to 42 per cent in Kurnool. In urban
cooking resulting in indoor pollution. The adverse effects
of indoor pollution include respiratory infections in young
23
Differences are also observed in the types of latrines available across regions children; complications for women exposed during
and across urban and rural areas. While the water closet is the important type
of latrine reported in urban areas, it is pit latrines in rural areas, with the
24
exception of the Coastal Andhra region where water closets are used even in Indoor pollution is an important traditional environmental hazard related
rural areas. to poverty and lack of development.
Environment 155
regional or district levels and the environmental index at which are relatively richer in natural resources endowment,
district level leads to interesting conclusions. There are are still marginalized for lack of adequate infrastructure
inter-district differences in endowment, quality as well facilities like irrigation. Although efforts have been made
as distribution of important natural resources like land, to improve the natural resources conditions in the state,
water and forests. The declining per capita availability of more attention needs to be given to the districts which
land accompanied by an increase in under-utilized and are lagging behind. This is also true with regard to
degraded land exerts increasing pressure on land resources, environmental health conditions. There is a wide gap
which needs to be reversed. The declining trend in canal between urban and rural areas with regard to access to
and tank irrigation and the increased dependence on wells tap water, sanitation facilities and use of solid fuels for
also has an impact, seen in declining groundwater levels cooking, which has serious consequences on the health
which is very serious in some regions. Some districts, and well-being of people.
12.1 Introduction
he concept of (good) governance has
The lines between inter-group conflicts based on The Standing Committees at the Mandal level can
economic divisions and those based on political differences perform the role of monitoring and arbitration. Monitoring
are blurred. This is due to a significant trend: the tendency can not only be regulatory but also be an incentive,
either for politicians to turn into contractors or for encouraging the CBOs to perform better by arranging
contractors to turn into politicians. This, in turn, is mainly for monetary incentives. The Committees at the MP (Mandal
the result of the financial incentives in programmes like Parishad) arbitrate when there is a dispute between different
watershed development and water user associations. Not GPs due to overlapping of functions and jurisdiction
only are the financial flows to these programmes much (watershed area). The functional Committee of the GP
higher than the funds available to PRIs, but the institutional should be involved in planning and implementation for
arrangements have also facilitated the access of the village those activities at the MP that also involve implementation.
Appendix - II 205
Table A2.2 : Growth of GSDP across Major States in India
Sno States 2001-2/04-5 1990-91/2000-1 1980-1/1990-1 1980-1/1992-3 1993-4/2004-5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Andhra Pradesh 6.42 6.11 5.50 5.54 5.74
2 Assam 5.24 2.58 3.51 3.57 3.22
3 Bihar 4.58 4.71 4.55 3.78 4.54
4 Gujarat 9.30 8.11 4.96 4.94 6.01
5 Haryana 7.20 6.06 6.24 6.00 5.97
6 Himachal Pradesh 6.72 7.72 4.91 4.94 6.36
7 Jammu&Kashmir 5.12 6.11 2.94 3.16 4.58
8 Karnataka 6.07 7.92 5.16 5.39 6.73
9 Kerala 9.01 7.15 3.51 3.91 5.58
10 Madhya Pradesh 5.61 6.41 4.46 4.40 3.92
11 Maharastra 7.86 6.58 5.85 6.09 5.15
12 Orissa 8.44 4.41 4.20 3.83 4.36
13 Punjab 4.73 4.35 5.18 5.04 4.27
14 Rajastan 7.28 7.82 6.39 6.35 5.55
15 Tamil Nadu 4.80 7.54 5.24 5.27 4.84
16 Uttar Pradesh 5.31 4.80 4.83 4.65 4.00
17 West Bengal 6.96 7.41 4.60 4.73 6.81
18 Delhi 8.44 7.40 7.32 7.59 8.10
Table A2.3: Growth of Per Capita GSDP across Major States in India
Sno States 2001-2/04-5 1990-91/2000-1 1980-1/1990-1 1980-1/1992-3 1993-4/2004-5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Andhra Pradesh 5.10 4.77 3.33 3.39 4.69
2 Assam 3.46 0.90 1.37 1.39 1.71
3 Bihar 2.80 2.41 2.43 1.66 2.18
4 Gujarat 7.68 6.15 3.00 3.03 3.94
5 Haryana 5.50 3.58 3.81 3.60 3.50
6 Himachal Pradesh 5.02 6.08 3.08 3.07 4.73
7 Jammu&Kashmir 2.51 3.17 0.40 0.63 1.69
8 Karnataka 4.83 6.29 3.20 3.51 5.18
9 Kerala 7.88 6.33 2.13 2.55 4.88
10 Madhya Pradesh 3.54 4.34 2.10 2.04 1.86
11 Maharastra 6.41 4.51 3.56 3.81 3.21
12 Orissa 7.17 2.94 2.39 2.00 3.10
13 Punjab 2.90 2.46 3.30 3.14 2.58
14 Rajastan 5.32 5.32 3.84 3.87 2.96
15 Tamil Nadu 3.76 6.44 3.80 3.90 3.76
16 Uttar Pradesh 3.29 2.49 2.54 2.41 1.54
17 West Bengal 5.57 5.72 2.41 2.55 5.27
18 Delhi 5.44 3.48 3.14 3.48 4.36
Note : Growth rate is derived from exponential trend equation.
Source : Computed using CSO data.
Note : 1. Employment includes both the Principal and Subsidiary status workers; 2. Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR); 3. For the
year 2004-05 Bihar, MP and UP refer to pre-reorganized status..
Source : Various Report of NSS Employment and Unemployment survey
Appendix - II 207
Table : A2.6 Percentage of Workforce in Non-Agricultural Activities across major states in India
Rural All
Sno State
1993-94 1999-00 2004-05 1993-94 1999-00 2004-05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Andhra Pradesh 20.70 21.2 28.2 32.9 34.6 41.5
2 Assam 20.80 32.3 25.7 29.0 39.8 34.0
3 Bihar 15.70 19.4 24.3 24.9 26.9 31.2
4 Gujarat 21.30 20.2 22.7 37.7 40.5 45.1
5 Haryana 28.10 31.5 35.9 43.4 47.2 49.7
6 Himachal Pradesh 19.70 26.4 30.4 23.4 30.4 35.9
7 Karnataka 18.80 17.9 19.0 34.3 37.5 39.3
8 Kerala 43.60 51.7 58.0 51.5 61.5 64.5
9 Madhya Pradesh 10.20 12.9 16.4 22.3 26.1 30.8
10 Maharashtra 17.40 17.4 20.0 40.8 43.7 46.8
11 Orissa 19.10 21.8 31.0 26.9 29.3 37.6
12 Punjab 25.30 27.4 33.1 42.6 46.7 52.4
13 Rajasthan 20.10 22.3 27.1 31.3 34.0 38.3
14 Tamil Nadu 29.50 32.1 34.6 44.8 53.6 58.7
15 Uttar Pradesh 20.00 23.8 26.9 32.2 36.5 39.1
16 West Bengal 36.70 36.4 37.3 52.8 53.3 54.3
All India 21.60 23.7 27.3 36.0 39.6 43.3
Table : A2.9 Sex Ratio at Birth and of the Child (Age Table :A2.10 Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) across Major States in India
Group 0-4 across Major States in India, 2001-2003
Rank
At Birth Children of 0-4 age States 1992-93 1998-99 2005-06 (2005-06)
States
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban 1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Andhra Pradesh 70 66 53 11
Andhra Pradesh 932 923 963 955 959 943 Assam 89 70 66 14
Assam 904 903 917 939 937 967 Chattisgarh - 81 71 16
Gujarat 69 63 50 10
Bihar 861 861 860 906 908 889
Haryana 73 57 42 6
Gujarat 862 876 827 853 870 812
Himachal Pradesh 56 34 36 3
Haryana 807 816 765 787 791 766 J&K - 65 45 8
Himachal Pradesh 803 799 865 867 869 830 Karnataka 65 52 43 7
Karnataka 943 939 956 967 972 953 Kerala 24 16 15 1
Kerala 892 880 932 941 935 959 Madhya Pradesh - 88 70 15
Madhya Pradesh 922 929 882 909 910 903 Maharashtra 51 44 38 4
Maharashtra 887 908 852 894 904 874 Orissa 112 81 65 13
Orissa 934 940 880 941 946 894 Punjab 54 57 42 5
Punjab 776 780 761 785 788 775 Rajasthan 73 80 65 12
Rajasthan 855 849 893 884 885 882 Tamil Nadu 68 48 31 2
Tamil Nadu 953 972 909 943 954 918 Uttar Pradesh - 89 73 17
West Bengal 75 49 48 9
Uttar Pradesh 853 853 856 882 882 882
West Bengal 937 948 886 950 956 921 All India 77 67 55 -
India 883 888 866 905 909 888 Source: Compiled from Fact Sheets of NFHS-3 at State Level, Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India
Source: Registrar General of India
Appendix - II 209
Table : A2.11 Six High HIV/AIDS Prevalence States of India, 2005
States STD clinics* ANC clinics*
1 2 3
Andhra Pradesh 22.8 2.00
Karnataka 13.6 1.25
Maharashtra 10.4 1.25
Tamilnadu 9.2 0.50
Manipur 12.2 1.25
Nagaland 3.5 1.63
Note : *Percent of high risk group attendees in clinics
Source : NACO 2005;
Note : Figures represent percentage of households which are having protein and energy
adequately according RDA (Recommended Dietary Allowance).
Source : NIN (1999)
Table A2.14: Anthropometrical Measures of Women and Children across Major states in Indian
Percentage of Women with Percentage of Children
Sno States BMI <18.5 kg/m (below - 2 SD) Underweight
1998-99 2005-06 1992-93 1998-99 2005-06
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Andhra Pradesh 37.4 33.5 49.1 37.7 32.5
2 Assam 27.1 36.5 50.4 36 36.4
3 Bihar 39.3 44.6 62.6 54.4 56.0
4 Gujarat 37 36.3 50.1 45.1 44.6
5 Haryana 25.9 31.3 37.9 34.6 39.6
6 Himachal Pradesh 29.7 29.9 47 43.6 36.5
7 Jammu & Kashmir 26.4 24.6 44.5 34.5 25.6
8 Karnataka 38.8 35.5 54.3 43.9 37.6
9 Kerala 18.7 18.0 28.5 26.9 22.9
10 Madhya Pradesh 38.2 42.1 57.4 55.1 56.7
11 Maharashtra 39.7 36.2 54.2 49.6 37.0
12 Orissa 48 41.4 53.3 54.4 40.7
13 Punjab 16.9 18.9 45.9 28.7 24.9
14 Rajasthan 36.1 36.7 41.6 50.6 39.9
15 Tamil Nadu 29 28.4 48.2 36.7 29.8
16 Uttar Pradesh 35.8 35.7 59 51.7 42.2
17 West Bengal 43.7 39.1 56.8 48.7 38.7
All India 35.8 35.6 53.4 47 42.5
Note : 1. The Body Mass Index (BMI) is the ratio of the weight in kilograms to the square of the
height in meters (kg/m). The BMI data presented is percentage of ever-married women with
BMI below 18.5 kg./m ;
2. For Underweight the figures are for children born 1-47 months prior to survey.
Source : 1. National Human Development Report 2001, 2. National Family Health Surveys
Appendix - II 211
Table : A2.15 Percentage of Births Attended by Health Professionals, Major States of India
1992-93 1998-99 2005-06
Sno States
Rural Urban All Rural Urban All All
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Andhra Pradesh 39.7 78.3 49.3 58.5 85 65.1 74.9
2 Assam 14.1 56.8 17.8 18.9 64.6 21.5 31.0
3 Bihar 14 52 18.9 20.8 52.3 23.5 28.9
4 Gujarat 32 65.7 42.6 41.8 74.2 53.5 63.0
5 Haryana 24.1 52.5 30.3 34.8 66.1 42 48.9
6 Himachal Pradesh 22.2 67.4 25.6 37.2 78.4 40.4 47.8
7 Jammu & Kashmir 25.4 67.2 31.2 36 81.2 43.1 56.5
8 Karnataka 40.3 77.2 50.9 47 86.4 59.2 69.7
9 Kerala 87.6 95.7 89.7 92.8 99.4 94.1 99.4
10 Madhya Pradesh 22.1 61.1 30 21.2 62.3 30.1 35.0
11 Maharashtra 37.6 77.8 53.1 43.8 84.1 59.7 68.7
12 Orissa 15.6 48.7 20.5 30.5 61.4 33.7 44.0
13 Punjab 44.7 60.1 48.4 58.1 78.2 62.7 68.2
14 Rajasthan 17.4 45.2 21.8 29.3 63 36.2 41.0
15 Tamil Nadu 59.7 91.8 71.2 78.4 95.1 84.1 90.6
16 Uttar Pradesh 11.6 44.2 17.2 17.5 52.3 23 27.7
17 West Bengal 23.1 66.5 33 36.2 81.7 44.5 47.6
All India 25 65.3 34.2 33.5 73.3 42.3 46.6
Note : 1. Doctors, Auxiliary Nurse Midwife, Lady Health Visitor and other Health Professionals not
including traditional birth attendants and others.
Source : 1. National Human Development Report 2001, 2. National Family Health Surveys
Table : A2.16 Percentage of Births Delivered in Medical Institutions, Major States of India
1992-93 1998-99 2005-06
Sno States
Rural Urban All Rural Urban All All
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Andhra Pradesh 20.7 69.6 32.9 40.4 78.6 50.0 64.4
2 Assam 7.4 50.1 11.1 15 59.9 17.6 22.4
3 Bihar 7.7 41.4 12.1 12.4 39.9 14.7 19.5
4 Gujarat 23.7 62.1 35.6 33.2 69.4 46.4 52.7
5 Haryana 11 36.8 16.7 14.9 47.1 22.3 35.7
6 Himachal Pradesh 12.6 22.2 16 25.5 72.2 29.0 43.0
7 Jammu & Kashmir 17.8 47 21.9 28.6 74.8 35.9 50.2
8 Karnataka 25.8 66.6 37.5 38.7 78.8 51.1 64.7
9 Kerala 85.4 94.7 87.8 91.5 99.4 93.0 99.3
10 Madhya Pradesh 7.4 49.7 15.9 12.3 49.8 20.4 23.2
11 Maharashtra 25.3 73.3 43.9 34.6 80.9 52.8 64.6
12 Orissa 9.7 39.8 14.1 19.3 54.7 22.9 35.6
13 Punjab 21.3 36.2 24.8 32 56 37.5 51.3
14 Rajasthan 7.2 35 11.6 15 47.9 21.7 29.6
15 Tamil Nadu 48.7 89.8 63.5 73.1 92.6 79.8 87.8
16 Uttar Pradesh 6.5 34.1 11.2 11.7 37.3 15.7 20.6
17 West Bengal 21.4 66 31.5 31.5 80.1 40.4 42.0
All India 16 57.6 25.5 24.6 65.1 33.6 38.7
Note : 1. Public or private health facility/institution including non-governmental organisation (NGO)/Trust.
Source: 1. National Human Development Report 2001, 2. National Family Health Surveys
Sno States Number of children Quantity of Food grains Percentage of off-take of Extent of coverage of
covered (in Lakhs) allocated (in MTs) Food grains cooked-Meal Programme
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Andhra Pradesh 77.2 178278 0.9 Full
2 Bihar 88.7 245300 0.7 Partial
3 Chhattisgarh 28.3 56572 1.1 Full
4 Gujarat 30.0 60090 0.7 Full
5 Haryana 15.8 45871 0.9 Partial
6 Himachal Pradesh 6.2 18445 1.0 Partial
7 Jammu & Kashmir 7.4 22163 Nil Not implementing
8 Jharkhand 22.5 51796 0.4 Partial
9 Karnataka 53.5 145853 0.6 Full
10 Kerala 21.7 43330 1.0 Full
11 Madhya Pradesh 77.3 165835 0.9 Partial
12 Maharashtara 97.2 223587 0.8 Full
13 Orissa 46.3 123425 0.9 Partial
14 Punjab 15.6 45490 0.5 Partial
15 Rajasthan 76.8 168919 0.8 Full
16 Sikkim 0.8 1537 0.8 Full
17 Tamil Nadu 55.3 110599 0.7 Full
18 Uttar Pradesh 163.8 491247 0.8 Foodgrains
19 Uttaranchal 7.9 15744 1.3 Full
20 West Bengal 102.7 305988 0.8 Partial
All India 1056.7 2684067 0.8
Source: MHRD
Table: A2.18 Incidence of Cognizable Crime Committed Against SC/STs and Crime Rate across major states in India
Incidence Population Crime Rate
States
SC ST SC ST SC ST
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Andhra Pradesh 3117 515 132 54 23.7 9.5
Assam 282 216 19 35 14.8 6.1
Bihar 2101 565 181 84 11.6 6.7
Gujarat 1307 237 38 81 34.0 2.9
Haryana 288 0 45 - 6.4 -
Himachal Pradesh 55 10 16 3 3.5 3.9
Karnataka 1780 161 91 45 19.5 3.6
Kerala 345 82 32 4 10.7 21.3
Madhya Pradesh 4810 2112 125 206 38.4 10.3
Maharashtra 865 224 104 92 8.3 2.4
Orissa 1439 602 65 87 22.0 6.9
Punjab 140 0 77 - 1.8 -
Rajasthan 3795 863 108 79 35.3 10.9
Tamil Nadu 1206 13 124 7 9.7 1.9
Uttar Pradesh 4496 7 404 4 11.1 1.7
West Bengal 12 12 196 47 0.1 0.3
Delhi 21 1 26 - 0.8 -
India 26127 5713 1806 926 14.5 6.2
Note : 1. Population is in lakhs; 2. Crime Rate is incidence for lakh of respective category (SC/ST) population; 3.
Population figures are extrapolated based on the growth (CAGR) during 1991-2001.
Source : www.indiastat.com; Ministry of Home Affairs.
Appendix - II 213
Table : A2.19 Crude Death Rates in Southern States Table : A2.20 Crude Birth Rates in Southern States
Year AP Karnataka Kerala Tamil Nadu All India Year AP Karnataka Kerala Tamil Nadu All India
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1971 14.6 12.1 9.0 14.4 14.9 1971 34.8 31.7 31.1 31.4 36.9
1981 11.1 9.1 6.6 11.8 12.5 1981 31.7 28.3 28.0 28.0 33.9
1991 9.7 9.0 6.0 8.8 9.8 1991 26.0 26.9 20.8 20.8 29.5
2002 8.1 7.2 6.4 7.7 8.1 2002 20.7 22.1 18.5 18.5 25.0
Source : Sample Registration System Source : Sample Registration System
Table : A2.21 Infant Mortality Rates in Southern States Table : A2.22 Trends in Total Fertility Rate in Southern States
Year AP Karnataka Kerala Tamil Nadu All India Year AP Kerala Tamil Nadu All India
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5
1971 106 95 58 113 129 1971–73 4.5 4.0 3.8 5.1
1981 86 69 37 91 110 1976–78 4.3 3.1 3.7 4.6
1991 73 77 16 57 80 1981–83 3.9 2.8 3.3 4.5
2002 62 55 10 44 63 1986–88 3.6 2.2 2.6 4.1
1991–93 2.8 1.7 2.2 3.6
2005 57 50 14 37 58
1996–98 2.5 1.8 2.1 3.3
Source : Sample Registration System 2001–03 2.2 1.8 2.0 3.0
NFHS-1, (1992–93) 2.29 2.00 2.48 3.39
Table : A2.23 Maternal Mortality Ratio in Southern States NFHS- 2, (1998–99) 2.25 1.96 2.19 2.85
States MMR(1997) 95 percent CI MMR (2003) 95 percent CI NFHS- 3, (2005–06) 1.79 1.93 1.80 2.68
1 2 3 4 5
Source : 1 Sample Registration System
AP 220 (155-286) 195 (132-257)
2. NHFS-3 Fact sheets
Karnataka 266 (202-331) 228 (169-287)
Kerala 149 (91-207) 110 (59-161)
Tamil Nadu 167 (111-224) 134 (83-185)
India Total 327 (311-343) 301 (285-317)
Source : Sample Registration System, 2006
Table : A2.24 Maternal and Reproductive Health Situation in Southern States, India
States At least three Consumed IFA Institutional Postnatal care* Reproductive tract
ANC* for 90 days* Delivery* Infections**
1 2 3 4 5 6
Andhra Pradesh 86.0 39.3 68.6 69.8 13.7
Karnataka 79.3 40.0 66.9 61.0 19.2
Kerala 93.9 77.3 99.5 87.7 41.3
Tamil Nadu 96.5 43.2 90.4 89.6 17.1
India Total 50.7 22.3 40.7 36.4 32.3
Source : National Family Health Survey (1989-99)
Table : A2.26 Number per 1000 Households with no Literate Adult (A)
/ Female (F) Adults across Social Groups
ST SC OBC Others
State
A F A F A F A F
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Rural: 1999-2000
AP 693 877 522 772 477 765 240 502
Kerala 155 286 53 183 25 85 20 65
all-India 476 745 413 724 320 630 198 449
Rural 2004-05
AP 499 649 392 654 397 619 233 416
Kerala 202 286 83 117 17 48 10 25
All-India 381 619 327 605 257 514 159 341
Urban: 1999-2000
AP 343 662 268 565 218 444 86 261
Kerala 24 108 27 99 14 110 17 108
all-India 231 484 237 540 140 380 65 249
Urban 2004-05
AP 220 447 167 330 152 344 78 180
Kerala - - 15 49 14 32 6 25
All-India 143 300 148 338 103 242 45 108
Appendix - II 215
APPENDIX - III
District Level Tables
Note : 1. ISR is derived from IMR (i.e. ISR = 1000-IMR); 2. C V – Coefficient of Variation.
Source: Irudaya Rajan and Mohanchandran (2007)
Note : 1. Schooling is percentage of Children 5-14 Age group Attending School and adult literacy is for the age
group 15 years and above; 2. C V – Coefficient of Variation.
Source : Census of India, Andhra Pradesh.
Note : 1. See Technical note for the computation of normalized indices; 2. C V – Coefficient of Variation.
Source : 1. Computed using Economic Survey of Andhra Pradesh 2005-06 for Per Capita District Income, Census data for Adult
Literacy and School Attendance, Irudaya Rajan’s Study for Infant Mortality Rates.
Note : 1. Per capita DDP is in 1993-94 prices; 2. Districts are in arranged according their ranking in terms
of growth in the GDDP.
Source : Directorate of Economics and Statistics, GOAP, Hyderabad.
Note : 1. % of Wells to NIA indicates the percentage of area irrigated under the source of well irrigation to the
net irrigated area (NIA); 2. Others Wells in Total Wells indicates the percentage of area irrigated under
the source of the ‘other wells’ which excludes the tube wells, to the area irrigated under the source of
well irrigation (including both tube wells and other wells).
Source : 1. Directorate of Ecnomics and Statistics (DES), Hyderabad; 2. Subramanyam and Aparna (2007).
Note : 1. The data considered here is components of Gross District Domestic Product (GDDP); 2. Crop
output includes value of output from all the agriculture and allied activities excluding livestock; 3.
Figures presented from col. 3 to 8 are percentages; 4. Growth is exponential growth rate.
Source : 1. Computed using Directorate of Ecnomics and Statistics (DES), Hyderabad data.
Per Capita GDDP Per Worker Agril. Output Per Hectare Agril. Output
Sno District
Rs. Rank Rs. Rank Rs. Rank
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Srikakulam 12914 21 8032 16 22274 12
2 Vizianagaram 12844 22 8133 15 20729 14
3 Visakhapatnam 24858 1 8212 14 23594 10
4 East Godavari 20328 6 17826 2 50923 2
5 West Godavari 20159 7 21916 1 55042 1
6 Krishna 20696 5 15310 4 34417 4
7 Guntur 18540 8 17063 3 40661 3
8 Prakasam 16282 12 11371 8 21301 13
9 Nellore 18416 9 12464 6 28122 6
10 Chittoor 16405 11 7379 18 23464 11
11 Kadapa 15194 14 6812 20 12922 19
12 Anantapur 14492 17 7932 17 9129 22
13 Kurnool 14675 16 11851 7 15844 17
14 Mahabubnagar 13342 20 6063 22 11038 21
15 Rangareddy 20724 3 6629 21 14622 18
16 Medak 21870 2 9437 11 19470 15
17 Nizamabad 13636 19 9311 12 29043 5
18 Adilabad 15637 13 10160 10 12702 20
19 Karimnagar 17543 10 9220 13 26818 8
20 Warangal 14161 18 10585 9 25325 9
21 Khammam 20698 4 12493 5 27167 7
22 Nalgonda 15036 15 7014 19 15938 16
Note : 1. Triennium (TE) 2001-04; 2. Growth Rate of Agricultural Output 1991-92 to 2004-05 (%); 3. The
per capita GDDP is at 1999-2000 prices.
Source : Subrahmanyam and Aparna (2007)
Note : 1. Figures presented are in percentages; 2. Growth is CAGR and between 1991 and 2001 for number of
Workers; TW – Total Workers; AW – Workers in Agriculture; Agrl – Agriculture; 3. Workers include both the
main and the marginal; 4. Diversification Index (1-H) is nothing but a reverse of Herfindahl index which is
to indicate the concentration levels.
Source : Census of India
Note : 1. The disparity index is calculated as follows DI = female / male where in disparity index approaches 1 indicates the least
disparity and vice versa; 2. FL – Field Labour.
Source : 1. Census of India, Andhra Pradesh; DES, Hyderabad.
Note : 1. The disparity index is calculated as follows DI = female / male where in disparity
index approaches 1 indicates the least disparity and vice versa; 2. FL – Field
Labour.
Source : 1. DES, Hyderabad.
Table : A3.17 District - wise Trends in Total Fertility Rate Table : A3.18 Reproductive Health Index, Districts of A P
in Andhra Pradesh Districts RHI* Districts RHI**
Districts 1981 1991 2001 Mahabubnagar 49.4 Mahabubnagar 45.17
Srikakulam 4.1 3.4 2.4 Kurnool 52.5 Vizianagaram 47.98
Vizianagaram 4.0 3.4 2.5 Vizianagaram 55.1 Kurnool 49.17
Visakapatnam 4.0 3.4 2.2 Nizamabad 58.0 Nizamabad 50.32
East Godavari 3.8 3.4 2.1 Nalgonda 58.3 Srikakulam 51.24
West Godavari 3.9 3.0 2.0 Anantapur 58.7 Medak 53.11
Krishna 4.3 3.3 1.9 Srikakulam 59.4 Visakhapatnam 54.83
Guntur 4.1 3.2 1.9 Medak 59.7 Anantapur 55.92
Prakasam 4.6 3.5 2.3 Kadapa 62.2 Adilabad 56.27
Nellore 3.9 3.1 2.0 Rangareddy 62.7 Prakasam 57.66
Chittoor 4.0 3.1 2.2 Adilabad 62.7 Khammam 57.93
Cuddapah 4.5 3.4 2.3 Prakasam 63.6 Rangareddy 58.07
Ananthapur 4.9 3.9 2.4 Khammam 64.6 Kadapa 59.12
Kurnool 5.0 4.3 3.0 Visakhapatnam 65.8 Karimnagar 60.11
Mahabubnagar 4.9 4.5 3.1 Warangal 67.6 East Godavari 62.50
Rangareddy 4.8 3.9 2.6 Chittoor 68.6 Warangal 63.74
Hyderabad 4.2 4.1 1.9 West Godavari 69.5 Nalgonda 65.15
Medak 4.6 4.2 2.9 Karimnagar 69.8 Guntur 65.97
Nizamabad 4.1 3.3 2.5 Nellore 70.7 West Godavari 66.39
Adilabad 4.6 3.8 2.7 East Godavari 70.7 Chittoor 68.08
Karimnagar 4.1 3.4 2.2
Guntur 71.1 Hyderabad 68.12
Warangal 4.6 4.1 2.5
Krishna 72.9 Nellore 69.02
Khammam 4.7 3.7 2.3
Hyderabad 74.2 Krishna 70.36
Nalgonda 4.5 4.3 2.6
Andhra Pradesh 4.3 3.4 2.3 Note : 1. * Index based on 5 Indices, i.e. TFR, Birth order 4+,
Skilled attention at the time of birth, IMR, and Educational
Source : 1.Data for 1981&1991, RGI, Occassional Paper No.1 of attainment of women
1997, Table 2.0, p.88; 2.Data for 2001, Christophe Z 2. ** Index based on 6 Indices, TFR, Birth order 4+, Skilled
Guilmoto, S.Irudaya Rajan: ‘District Levels Estimates of attention at the time of birth, IMR, Educational attainment
Fertility from India’s 2001 Census,EPW, Feb 16,2002 of women , and % Married<18 years
Note : AMB/G – Percentage Married Below the Legal Age 21 for Boys and 18 for Girls; CUFP – Percentage of women currently
using Family Planning Methods; FSt – Percentage of Female Sterilisation; NANC – Percentage of Women with No Ante-
natal Checkup; FANC – Percentage Undergone Full Antenatal Care (i.e. at least 3 visits for ANC + at least one TT injection
+ 100 or more IFA tablets/syrup); SD – Percentage of Safe Delivery (Either institutional delivery or home delivery attended
by Doctor/Nurse); FI - Percentage of children age 12-35 months received Full Immunization; SEFSt – Percentage of
Women had side effects due to female sterilization; VHW – Percentage of Women visited by ANM/Health worker; BO3
–Percentage of Birth Order 3 and above.
Source : IIPS, Bombay
Table : A3.25 District-wise distribution of the Index of Gender Equality in Literacy in Rural & Partial Urban
Mandals of Andhra Pradesh as per the specified levels of Female Literacy Rates, 2001
Sno District <20 20-30 30-40 40-50 >50 All
1 Srikakulam 56.7 59.8 64.8 72.9 65.2
2 Vizianagaram 55.0 60.0 67.1 80.4 64.9
3 Visakhapatnam 42.0 46.1 59.0 69.7 79.8 71.3
4 East Godavari 73.2 85.9 87.7 87.2
5 West Godavari 88.9 88.9
6 Krishna 66.9 70.4 85.7 84.9
7 Guntur 51.5 60.5 67.8 80.8 75.8
8 Prakasam 48.1 57.5 63.6 74.0 65.1
9 Nellore 67.3 79.6 76.5
10 Chittoor 56.8 63.5 75.1 71.6
11 Kadapa 53.9 60.6 71.7 65.6
12 Anantapur 52.6 57.0 62.9 72.2 63.0
13 Kurnool 40.9 47.5 55.4 60.9 70.6 60.4
14 Mahabubnagar 40.5 50.4 56.5 67.5 56.4
15 Ranga Reddy 57.8 52.4 55.6 69.0 75.9 71.6
16 Medak 49.8 55.4 63.9 76.1 61.5
17 Nizamabad 49.3 56.3 62.5 71.0 60.9
18 Adilabad 59.4 50.0 56.3 63.3 68.8 62.8
19 Karimnagar 58.1 57.6 64.7 75.4 64.8
20 Warangal 58.2 64.7 75.4 66.1
21 Khammam 54.7 63.8 69.8 76.7 71.5
22 Nalgonda 6.4 49.0 58.1 63.0 71.5 63.7
Coastal Andhra 42.0 50.3 59.8 67.7 84.0 77.6
Rayalaseema 40.9 48.7 56.0 62.0 73.2 65.6
Telangana 35.0 50.6 57.5 65.4 74.0 64.7
Andhra Pradesh 38.2 50.3 57.7 65.3 79.7 70.6
Source: Census
Table : A3.27 Number Non-literate per 1000 Adults among Social Groups in Andhra
Pradesh during 1993-94, 1999-2000 and 2004-05
Sno Category Andhra Pradesh All India
1993-94 1999- 00 2004-05 1993-94 1999- 00 2004-05
RURAL
1 ST Males 774 763 697 588 523 458
2 ST Females 922 889 863 843 771 715
3 SC Males 639 585 505 542 475 407
4 SC Females 875 801 754 824 755 685
5 OBC Males 528 475 374 312
6 OBC Females 790 716 675 601
7 OTH Males 492 324 313 349 240 215
8 OTH Females 772 542 406 655 506 434
URBAN
9 ST Males 487 397 218 250 233 176
10 ST Females 702 618 303 505 455 399
11 SC Males 357 299 237 319 263 193
12 SC Females 627 538 480 620 521 450
13 OBC Males 255 219 179 148
14 OBC Females 488 456 383 339
15 OTH Males 200 115 130 137 89 75
16 OTH Females 440 267 273 322 216 175
Source : NSSO
Table : A3.29 Percent Children in the age group 6 to 14 years Attending Schools in
Andhra Pradesh, census 2001
All Rural Urban
Social Category
All Boys Girls All Boys Girls All Boys Girls
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Total 77.86 81.24 74.30 76.15 80.45 71.61 82.76 83.53 81.97
CV 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.05
ST 64.13 70.97 56.50 63.24 70.38 55.27 74.73 77.91 71.13
CV 0.11 0.08 0.18 0.12 0.08 0.19 0.13 0.13 0.14
SC 76.86 81.01 72.46 75.80 80.51 70.74 82.20 83.57 80.83
CV 0.08 0.06 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.06
Others 79.56 82.43 76.57 78.07 81.90 74.07 83.06 83.68 82.41
CV 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.05
Notes : CV: Coefficient of variation in percent attendance across districts.
Source : Computed using Census 2001.
Note : 1. Growth is for Population and it is compound annual rate of growth (CAGR) and presented in
percentage form.
Source : Census of India, Andhra Pradesh.
Note : SDW – Safe Drinking Water; Santn. – Sanitation; Fuel – Solid Fuel; D I – Dimension Index; EI = Environmental Index
Source : Computed, using different sources of data.
Note : Dwelling – Percentage of households with one or none dwelling rooms; Tap Water – Percentage of households without tap water
for drinking; Electricity – Percentage of households without electricity connection; Toilet – Percentage of households without
toilet facility; Traditional Fuel – Percentage of households using traditional fuel for cooking including fire wood, charcoal, etc.,
Source: Census of India, Andhra Pradesh
Note : BPL – Percentage of children (below 14 years of age) living in those households which are below poverty line (rural
areas); SB indicates Safe Birth – Percentage of institutional deliveries in the total births; USI – Percentage of rural
children (below 14 years of age) living in households with unstable income (i.e. casual labour households); IMR –
Infant mortality rate; Immn. – Percentage of children with Immunization cards; PCIS – Percentage of children (5-14
age group) attending school; CDI – Child Development Index; WRLB – Percentage of women representatives in
Local Bodies in the recent elections; VR – Violence Rate (number of cases per lakh women); CSR – Child Sex Ratio.
Source: Different Sources.
Ajay, G (2007) “Negotiating Transformative Dilemmas- Dalit Assertion Bardhan, Pranab (1996) “Decentralized Development”, Indian
in Andhra Pradesh”, Paper presented at a seminar on Movements, Economic Review, Vol. XXXI (2), pp.139-156.
Social transformation and making of Modern Andhra Pradesh,
Bardhan, Pranab and Dilip Mookherjee (2000) “Capture and
CESS, Hyderabad, 17-18 March, 2007. Governance at Local and National Levels.”, American Economic
Alexander K C (1982) ‘Emergence of Peasant Organisations in South Review, Vol. 90 (2), pp.135-139.
India’ in S.A.Shah (ed) India: Degradation and Development, Bardhan, Pranab, (2002), “Decentralization of Government and
MV Foundation, Hyderabad. Development”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(4), 185-
205.
Anirudh Krishna (2003) “Falling into Poverty: Other Side of Poverty
Reduction”, Economic and Political Weekly, February 8. Baru, Sanjay (2007) “The Local and the Global in Hyderabad’s
Development”, Dr. Waheeduddin Khan Twelfth Memorial
Anirudh Krishna, Mahesh Kapila, Sharad Pathak, Mahendra Porwal, Lecture, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad.
Kiranpal Singh, Virpal Singh (2004) “Falling into Poverty in
BASIX, CARE-A Pand Vikasdharshini (1999), “Women’s Savings
Villages of Andhra Pradesh: Why Poverty Avoidance Policies
and Credit Movement in AP and A Proposal for a New Institutions
are Needed”, Economic and Political Weekly, July 17. AP MAT”, Report prepared for DFID (UK) India Office and
APPCB (2000) State of Environment in Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Commissionarate of Rural Development, Bhartya Samurudhi
Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Hyderabad." Investments consultancy, Government of A.P, July.
Practices from India”, Public Affairs Centre, Bangalore, August. Bhat, Mari P N (2002) "Counters of fertility decline in India: A district
level study based on the 1991 census", in K.Srinivasan ed.),
Balaopal, K. (2007), “Land Unrest in Andhra Pradesh – I, II & III”,
Population Policy and Reproductive Health, New Delhi,
Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLII (38, 39 & 40).
Hindustan Publishers, 96-727
Census of India. (2005) 17th Indian Livestock Census: All India Deaton, Angus and Jean Dreze (2002) “Poverty and Inequality in
Summary Report, New Delhi, Department of Animal Husbandry India: A Re-examination”, Economic and Political Weekly,
and Dairying: 217. September, 7.
CESS (2007) Report on Seminar Proceedings on ‘Movements, Social Deshpande RS, D. Rajasekhar, Pradeep Apte and Dhanmanjari
Transformation and making Modern Andhra Pradesh’, submitted Sathe (2004) NGOs and Farmers’ Movements, State of Indian
to ICSSR, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, March 2007. Farmer: A Millennium Study, Vol. 23, Ministry of Agriculture,
Government of India.
Chambers, R (1982) “Health, Agriculture and Rural Poverty: Why
Seasons Matter”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 18(2). Dev, S. Mahendra (2007) “Inclusive Growth in Andhra Pradesh:
Challenges in Agriculture, Poverty, Social Sector and Regional
Chatterjee, Partha (1983) “Peasants, Politics and Historiography: A
Disparities”, Working Paper No. 71, Centre for Economic and
Response”, Social Scientist, Vol. 11 (5), May, pp.58-65.
Social Studies, Hyderabad.
Chatterjee, Partha (1985) “Modes of Power: Some Reflections” Social
Dev, S. Mahendra (2008) Inclusive Growth in India: Agriculture,
Scientist, February.
Poverty and Human Development, O U P, New Delhi.
Chaudhury, Nazmul; Jeffrey Hammer; Michael Kremer; Karthik
Dev, S. Mahendra and C. Ravi (2007) “Poverty and Inequality: All
Muralidharan and F. Halsey Rogers (2006) “Missing in Action:
India and States, 1983-2005”, Economic and Political Weekly,
Teachers and Health Worker Absence in Developing Countries”,
Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20 (1), winter. Vol. 42 (6).
Chellaiah, R J and Sudarshan (1999) Income Poverty and Beyond: Dev. S. Mahendra and N. Sreedevi (2006) “Social Sector Expenditure
Human Development in India, Social Science Press, Nare not in Andhra Pradesh”, Manuscript, Centre for Economic and Social
availableew Delhi. Studies, Hyderabad.
Chinna Rao, Y (2007) Andhra Pradesh Dalita Udhyama Charitra Dev, S. Mahendra; K.S. James and Binayak Sen, (2002), “Causes of
(1990-1950), Hyderabad Book Trust, Hyderabad. Fertility Decline in India and Bangladesh: The Role of
Community”, Working Paper No.45, Centre for Economic and
CPCB (2000) National Ambient Air Quality Status 2000, Central
Social Studies, Hyderabad.
Pollution Control Board: New Delhi.
Dhangare, D. N (1991) Peasant Movements in India 1920-1950,
CPCB (2000) Status of Municipal Solid Waste Generation Collection
Treatment and Disposal in Class-I Cities, Central Pollution Control Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Board: New Delhi. Dixon, Pauline and James Tooley (2005) “The Regulation of Private
CSO (2004) Compendium of Environment Statistics of India 2002, Schooling Serving Low-Income Families in Andhra Pradesh,
Central Statistical Organisation. New Delhi. India”, The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol 18 (1).
Dasgupta, Partha and K G Maler (1997) “The Resource-Basis of Dreze, Jean and Amartya Sen (1995) India: Social Opportunity and
Production and Consumption: An Economic Analysis”, in Partha Economic Development, OUP, Oxford.
Dasgupta and K G Maler (eds) The Environment and Emerging Dreze, Jean and Amartya Sen (eds.) (1997) India Development:
Development Issues, Volume 1, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Regional Perspective, OUP, New Delhi.
Dasgupta, Partha and Weale, M (1992) “On Measuring the Quality
Durrant, Valerie L and Zeba A Sathar (2000) ‘Greater Investments in
of Life”, World Development, Vol. 20 (1), pp. 119-131.
Children through Women’s Empowerment: A Key to
Deaton, Angus (2001) “Computing Prices and Poverty Rates in India, Demographic Change in Pakistan’ Paper presented at the Annual
1999-2000”, Princeton, N J, Research Programme in Meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angles,
Development Studies. CA, March 23-25.
Galab, S; E. Revathi and P Prudhvikar Reddy (2007) “Farmers’ Government of India (2001) Report of the Working Group on
Suicides and unfolding Agrarian Crisis in Andhra Pradesh”, in “Decentralized Planning and Panchayati Raj Institutions”, for
D Narsimha Reddy and Srijith Misra (Ed.) Agrarian Crisis in the Tenth Five-year Plan, Ministry of Rural Development,
India, OUP, New Delhi (Fourthcoming). Government of India, New Delhi.
Galab, S; Prudvikar Reddy, Sree Rama Raju, K.S. Reddy, C. Ravi, Government of India (2002) National Human Development Report
Gopinath Reddy, K. Suri Babu and G.K. Mitra (2006) “The 2001, Planning Commission, Government of India, Delhi: Oxford
Mid-Term Appraisal of Andhra Pradesh District Poverty Initiatives University Press.
Project”, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad Government of India (2003) Women and Men in 2002, Ministry of
(project Report submitted to the Society for Elimination of Rural Statistics and Programme Implementation, Central Statistical
Poverty, Hyderabad). Organisation, Government of India.
Galab, S and N. Chandrasekhara Rao (2003), “Women and Self Government of India (2006) From Haryali to Neeranchal: Report of
Help Groups: Poverty Alleviation and Empowerment”, in C.H. the Technical committee on Watershed Programmes in India,
Hanumatha Rao and S. Mahendra Dev (eds) Andhra Pradesh Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development,
Development: Economic Reforms and Challenges Ahead, Centre Government of India, January.
for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad.
Government of India (2006) Women and Men in 2006, Ministry of
George, Alex (2002) “Quality of Reproductive Care in Private Hospitals Statistics and Programme Implementation, Central Statistical
in Andhra Pradesh: Womens’ Perception”, Economic and Political Organisation, Government of India.
Weekly, April 27. Government of India (2007) Patterns of Development in India: A
Ghosh, Madhusudan (2006) “Economic Growth and Human Study of Andhra Pradesh, SER Division, Planning Commission,
Development in Indian States” Economic and Political Weekly, New Delhi.
July 19. Govinda R and Biswal K (2005) ‘ Mapping Literacy in India: Who
are illiterates and where do we find them?’ Background paper
Government of Andhra Pradesh, (2000). Water Conservation Mission:
for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2006, Literacy for Life,
The Information and Guidelines.
UNESCO Document.
Government of Andhra Pradesh (2002), “Report of the Task Force
Govinda Rao, M, MRT Shand and K P Kalirajan (1999) “Convergence
Committee on Convergence of Programmes”, by Empowering
of Incomes across Indian States: A Divergent View”, Economic
Self Help Groups (SHGs) and Panchayati Raj Institutions,
and Political Weekly, Vol. 34 (13), March 28.
Hyderabad.
Guha, Ramachandra (2007) “Adivasis, Naxalites and Indian
Government of Andhra Pradesh (2004) Report of the Commission
Democracy” Economic and Political Weekly, Aug 11.
on Farmers’ Welfare, GOAP, Hyderabad.
Guha, Ranajit (1983a) Elementary aspects of Peasant Insurgency in
Government of Andhra Pradesh (2004) Facts and Figures, Hyderabad, India, Oxford University Press, Delhi.
A.P. Forest Department.
Guha, Ranjit (1983b) “The Prose of Counter – Insurgency” in Ranjit
Government of Andhra Pradesh (2005) Report of the Commission Guha (ed) Subaltern Studies – II, Oxford University Press, Delhi.
on Farmers’ Welfare, Commission of Agriculture, Department
Guilmoto, Christophe Z and S. I. Rajan (2002) “District Levels Estimates
of Agriculture, Government of AP, Hyderabad.
of Fertility from India’s 2001 Census”, Economic and Political
Government of Andhra Pradesh (2006) Land Committee report, Weekly, Feb 16, 2002.
GOAP, Andhra Pradesh.
MoEF (2003) Annual Report 2002-03, Ministry of Environment and NRSA (2005) Wastelands Atlas of India, National Remote Sensing
Forest, New Delhi. Area, Hyderabad.
MoEF (2006) Annual Report 2005-06, Ministry of Environment and NSSO (2000). “Sarvekshana” XXIV, No.1 84th Issue July-September.
Forest, New Delhi. NSSO (2003) Condition of Slums 2002: Salient Features, NSS 58th
Mooij, Jos (2002), “Welfare Policies and Politics: A Study of Three Round (July 2002-December 2002).
Government Interventions in Andhra Pradesh, India”, ODI
NSSO (2005a) Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers: Some Aspects
Working Paper 181, London: Overseas Development Institute,
of Farming, Report 496, National Sample Survey Organisation
London.
(NSSO), Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation,
Mooij, Jos (2003), “Smart Governance? Politics in the Policy Process GOI, New Delhi.
in Andhra Pradesh, India”, Working Paper, Overseas
NSSO (2005b) Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers: Indebetedness
Development Institute, U.K.
of Farmer Households, Report 498, National Sample Survey
Mukund, K (ed.) (1990) Andhra Pradesh Economy in Transition, Organisation (NSSO), Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Centre for Economic and Social Studies and Book Links, Implementation, GOI, New Delhi.
Hyderabad.
NSSO (2005c) Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers: Access to
NACO (2005) Epidemiological Surveillance and Estimation Report Modern Technology, Report 499, National Sample Survey
for the year 2005, NACO, New Delhi. Organisation (NSSO), Ministry of Statistics and Programme
NACO (2006) Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report Implementation, GOI, New Delhi.
2006,NACO, New Delhi. (http://www.nacoonline.org/upload/ NSSO (2006) ‘Employment and Unemployment Situation among
NACO%20PDFHIV%20Sentinel%20Surveillance%202006_India% Social groups in India, Report No.516, National Sample Survey
20Country%20Report.pdf) Organisation 61st round (2004-05), Ministry of Statistics and
Programme Implementation, GOI.
Parthasarathy, G (1970) Green Revolution and Weaker Sections, Ranis, Gustav, Frances Stewart and Alejandro Ramirez (2000)
Thacker and Co, Bombay “Economic Growth and Human Development”, World
Development, Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp. 197-219.
Parthasarathy, G (1995) “Public Intervention and Rural Poverty:
Case of Non-sustainable Reduction in Andhra Pradesh”, Rao, C. H. Hanumantha (1984) “Steps to Strengthen Growing Peasant
Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 30 (15). Sector” in Y. V. Krishna Rao, G. Parthasarathy; Ch. Rajeswar
Rao, M. Yada Reddy and Waheeuddin Khan (eds) Peasant
Planning Commission (2001) National Human Development Report
Farming and Growth of Capitalism in Indian Agriculture,
2001, Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.
Vishalandhra Publishing House, Vijayawada.
Radhakrishna, R (1990) “Poverty in Andhra Pradesh: Underpinning
Rao, C. H. Hanumantha (2005) Agriculture, Food Security, Poverty
and Policy Intervention” in K Mukund (ed.) Andhra Pradesh
Economy in Transition, Centre for Economic and Social Studies and Environment: Essays on Post-Reform India, Oxford University
and Book Links, Hyderabad. Press, New Delhi.
Radhakrishna, S and Ray (2005) Handbook of Poverty in India: Rao, C. H. Hanumantha (2007) Statehood for Telangana: New
Perspectives, Policies and Programmes, O U P, New Delhi. Imperatives”, The Hindu, January 8.
Raithu Sahaya Committee (RSC) 1998, Farmers’ Suicides in Andhra Rao, C. H. Hanumantha and S. Mahendra Dev (eds) (2003) Andhra
Pradesh: Report of the Peoples Tribunal, Raithu Sahaya Pradesh Development: Economic Reforms and Challenges
Committee, Hyderabad, July 1998. Ahead, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad.
Rajan, S. I. and P. Mohanachandran (1998) “Infant and Child Mortality Rao, M.S.A. (1978), Social Movements and Social Transformation:
Estimates, Part I”, Economic and Political Weekly, May 9, Vol. A study of Backward Classes Movement, Macmillan, New Delhi.
39 (19). Rao, R. S; V. Hanumantha Rao and N. Venugopal (eds.) (2006) Fifty
Rajan, S. I. and P. Mohanachandran (2007) District Level Infant Years of Andhra Pradesh, 1956-2006, Centre for Documentation,
Mortality Rate Estimates for Andhra Pradesh in 2001, Background Research and Communication, Hyderabad.
paper, Andhra Pradesh Human Development Report, CESS, Ravallion, M (1998) Do Price Increases for Staple Foods Help or
Hyderabad. Hurt the Rural Poor, The World Bank, Washington D C.
Rama Padma, G (2005) “Perceptions on Safe Motherhood: An
Reddy, D. Narasimha (2006) “Economic Reforms, Agrarian Crisis and
Analysis of Results from Rural Andhra Pradesh”, Economic
Rural Distress” paper present at Prof. B. Janardhan Rao Memorial
and Political Weekly, January 29.
Lecture (4th Annual), Prof. B J R Memorial Foundation, Warangal.
Rama Padma, G (2003) "Reproductive and Health Situation in Andhra
Reddy, D. Narasimha (2006) “Half a Century of Travails of Agriculture
Pradesh" Mimeo, Centre for Population and Development
in Andhra Pradesh” in R. S. Rao; V. Hanumantha Rao and N.
Studies, Hyderabad.
Venugopal (eds.) Fifty Years of Andhra Pradesh, Centre for
Ramachandraiah, C (2003) “Information Technology and Social Documentation, Research and Communication, Hyderabad.
Development”, in C. H. Hanumantha Rao and S. Mahendra
Reddy, M. Gopinath (2003) “Status of Decentralized Local Bodies:
Dev (eds) Andhra Pradesh Development: Economic Reforms
Post 73rd Amendment Scenario”, Economic and Political Weekly,
and Challenges Ahead, Centre for Economic and Social Studies,
Vol. XXXVIII No. 12 and 13 March 22-29.
Hyderabad.
Rustagi, P(2004) “Significance of Gender- related Development Sonalkar, Vandana (1984) ‘An Interpretation of History of the Women’s’
Indicators: An analysis of Indian States”, Indian Journal of Gender Movement in India from 1830 to the present’ in K.Murali Manohar
Studies, Vol.11, No.3 pp. 391-343. (ed) Women’s Status and development in India, Society for
Women’s Studies and Development.
Sainath, P (2004) “Sinking Borewells and Rising Debt”,
ww.indiatogether.org/2004/Jun/psa-sinkingbore. Soussan, John and V. Ratna Reddy (2003) “Andhra Pradesh Evolving
Appropriate Watershed Policy”, Economic and Political Weekly,
Sastry, K. R., C. P. Vithal and G. Ramachandraiah (1995), “Panchayati
Vol. XXXVIII (1), January 4-10.
Raj in Andhra Pradesh”, in National Institute of Rural
Sreedevi, N (2007) Public Spending on Child Development: A Case
Development, Panchayati Raj Institutions in Select States – An
of Andhra Pradesh, Manuscript, Centre for Economic and Social
Analytical Study. Hyderabad: NIRD.
Studies, Hyderabad.
Satyanarayana, A (2007) ‘Agrarian Movements and Social
Sreedevi, N (2006) “State Finance of Andhra Pradesh: An Overview”,
Transformation in Andhra Pradesh’ Paper presented at a seminar
in R. S. Rao; V. Hanumantha Rao and N. Venugopal (eds.) Fifty
on ‘Movements, Social transformation and making of Modern
Years of Andhra Pradesh 1956-2006, Centre for Documentation,
Andhra Pradesh’, CESS, Hyderabad 17-18 March, 2007.
Research and Communication, Hyderabad.