IR No: 1(S)._ Year 2008_Dater si (02) (3) Date (08 @Ack LPG Sections 302 Bact _ 7 CE Sections (iv) Others Acts and Sections (051 Type Final Form/Report . Not Charge sheeted for want efowidencie yori Unoocurred . Fulse/Mistake of faci/Mistake of Law’ Nu) civiiNature tick applicable portion) (07) I’ Chargeshaeted: Original/Suppiementary k applicable portion) ON eofthe LO. AGL, RAUL Rank: ADE () @) Name ofthe Complainani/Informant: Dr -Ralesh:Talivar {b) Pather'sName: +1 io Or LR Tabwar ieles/Documents Details of Properties/ wered/Seized d relied upon {separate list can be attached, red ing the vestigation a Pasha CT Property ~]Estimaied [PS Property ise | Description | Value (in | Register No. {Rs GY Sex(iv) Sex: -() Nationality : (vii (2) Occupation: Address :_ Whether verified x" Provisional Criminal No. Ga) Regular Criminal No.(if known) (sii) Date of Arrest xiv) Gey) Date on which forwarded to Court. (xvi) Under Acts & Sections _ — Place of Issue (Sil) Date/Year (xvii) Name(s) of bailers/sureties and address ‘Gviil) Previous convictions with case reference __ (ix) Status of the accused _ (forwarded/Bailed by Police/Bailed ‘Absconding/Proclaimed offender) Particulars of accused parsons - not charge- each accused) @ ~~ Name: i) Nationality: Indian #.R. Talwar (iif) Date/Year wit) Place by Court/dudicial Custos sheeted (usi- separa sh Talwar Whether verified (v2) Passport Se of Issue :a Crbninal No (#iv) Suspicion approved ___ ON led by court/’ proclaimed offender/.ot arrested) (xvi) & Sections _ @ Name: Krishna! Pather’s Name : Shri Chitrabahady Sex: Male (v) Na Gi) Date of Issue: R 4. Sector-25, J Budh Nagar, UP. (ii) Provisional Criminal No. &iv) (xy) cused (suspect)_Qn ball. By Court poli laimed of fal custody? a ‘bailed by court/in jr» ‘ender’ not arrested) F Acts & Seetions special rem lading reasons tor not cheVpetler ver rs Name: Sh. Shiv Kumar_ (iil) Date/Year of Bi Sex:Male (v) Nationality: __ ——. (vi) Passport Date of Issue:____ (vill) Place of Issue Religion: Hindu (x) Whether SC/STY OBC: Occupation: : Flat No, 35-4, Kanchanianga Apartment. See-20, Noida, UP, visional Criminal proved. ___ Fear No} Status of accused (suspect)_On bail. By Court (Bailed by police/bailed by court/in judicial eustody/ abscondines proclaimed offender’ xvi) Acts & special remarks including reasons for not ound innocent during investieati av) @ Name: Vik Whether verified _ Gf) Father's Name: :Male (v) NationoTity 1 Mandal (iii) Date/Ye: i) Pas (il) Date of Issue: __ (viii) Place of Issue + () Whether SC/ST/ OF: fotvayn Vib\Bailed by police, bailed by court/in judicial bseond ine, ndev/not arrested) eclal remarks ineluding re Found imocent du Sof witnesses fo be examined: sparate sheet, if required) ‘te action taken or proposed to be tal Type of 7 evidenc(17) Refer Notice served —. Yes/No__ Date, (18) Despatched on _ ce a 19) of enclosures, } * enclosures: As annes Ww _ 13,10 Pail Sr Poticercp Nilesh Sedo Porwara, BEInvestigation by UP Police (16. shi datighter of 134 sh fabvar and Drs Vihar, Sect-25, Noida was found mur in the morning 16.05.08 in her room, On the basis of written compiaine received fiom D Rujesh Talwar a case under crime no. 695/08 was registered! 1/5 30? PC a PS, Seci-20, Noida on 16.5.2008. Govi. of Uttar Pradesh issued notilics ne, 1937-VEP-3-2008-15(48) P2008, Lucknow. dtc for wansfer of investigation of this case to CSI Thereafter tion was issued by DOPT. Govt. of India, New Delhi on 31.05.08 we. eby the investigation of this case was transferred to CBI In ps notifications case crime no. 695/08 mentione: by CBI as RCN S¥/2008/SCR-IVCBUNew Deihi on 31. 2008 to 31.05.2008) On 16.5.2008, Dr. Rajesh ‘Fabwar in his written compl his servant Hemraj had killed his daughter in the ni that he was m ing. However the body of Hemraj, serve Talwar who was all ged to have killed Aarushi, was recove from the terrace of the ‘esidence of Dr. Rajesh T: Aarushi x conducted by Dr. Sunil Kumar T che of erime was inspecied by the Investigat of crime, UP Poli ing inspection of the © hn ‘Talwar was secure from all sides and there were n utside. No the ted by i of proper ing the sce 1¢. 00! of the house. The police personnel, afler inspe u ene of crime and also took surious3. During investigation by U.P. Police, Dr Rajesh Talves 08 and produced in the court at Ghaziabad 25.07.2008 the court granted three days police custody ti] 30.05.2008. Thereafter. Dr. Rajesh Talwar was sent ‘on 30.05.2008. Investigation by CBI (31.5.2008 - till date). 4 The CBI took Dr. Rajesh alwar in custody from O1.06.08 to During this period he was interrogated in detail but no J no evidence was found against n. His judicial custody was ¢ quest of CBI till 11.07.08 when finally CBI ed to the cay that “The scientific examination results could not co ct accused Rajesh r with the crime and that in view of the above circu ances fia al custody rémand accused Rajesh Talwar was aot required in miler st of justice”. The Hon ble Court granted. bail to Dr. Rajesh ‘Palwar on 11.07.08. Sequence of events revealed during investigation, Invest ion has revealed that [or.Rajesh |alwar was residing, 32. Sey Jaivayu Vihar. Noiia alongwith his wife Dr Sup daughter M ilemraj wes working in the s within the flat of flat of DeRajesh Talwar oc ¢ bedroos 1¢ id onc within an 1 irSome portion of the common wali bers made of plywood partition. Both the rooms we toom of Dr-Talwar had a window AC whereas the root p » During the night of incident both the ACs were between the bed of the Talwar couple and Aarushi we: was a student of DPS. Noida. Aarushi reading in cia 5/08 altemoon afler schoot tes 6 over. Aarushi w dup hy her + Nupur at about 1.30 p.m. After rewming 1 to their residence, ‘Land her mother stayed home. Before lunch De, Va Dr. Dinesh Talwar (brother of Dr. Raje: Dr sh Talwar) reached —_cesidence « Rajesh Talwar at Noida. Dr. Vandana Talwar. dacishs had lunch together. Dr. Vandana Talwar remain: 4pm. when she left to pick up her son and then went Khas, Dr. Nupur Talwar left Aarushi at home and went t her clisie. Si retumed ai around 7.30 P P.M. and both of them thereafter Ul retum of Br. Rajesh Talwar in the night. On 15/05/2008 at around 9.30pm, Dr. Rajesh Talwar ret home in f car driven by his driver Un eshi, who then went to parle the car is ' of Shri Chitnis, father in law of Dr, Rajesh Talwar. Umesh the t to the residence of Dr. Talwar and handed over the keys of the es i De. Talwar to Hemraj. At that time, Umesh saw Dr. Nupur and | the dining table and Dr. Talwar coming out from his bedsoo: 8 08 itself. a packet was de red ut the residence of Dy Tals which was received ‘aj. This contained Which was ordered by Dr. Tahwar through the intemet sisear12. gzill door lock from inside but could not do so. Dr. the door may be locked from outside at which Bha: ww the keys from the balcony. At time Dr, Nu Accordingly, Bharati went to the ground level and receive by Dr. Nupur from balcony. As per Dr.Nupur’s stater of t of Aarushi (il! she dropped the kext QruN upte this time. Wi had gone downstairs tc Dr.Nupur had called the mobile No. of Hemra iy came upstairs and opened the latch of the door en By that time, Dr, Nupur und Dr. Rajesh were found standing in the dint opposite the door of Aarushi’ ectively. Both wen room 1 yet Kya Karke and were telling maid Bharti “Dekho Hemraj a maid Bharti looked in Aarushi’s room. 5: covered with a white bed sheet. Dr. Nupur removed the « and showed it to Bhar On seeing this she became iF of the residence of Talwar's to inform the ighbours, two neighbours had come to the flat. Dr. Nupur also tclephoned her parents, Dr, Durra i and Dr. Dinesh Talwar. The parents of Nupu reach the residence of Dr. Rajesh Talwar. Police family at around 7.15 am On receiving information, local potice reached the sp Det re informed by necessary formalities. They w committed the murder ain! was missing. After necessary { By this time, some tre was sunt for posts including one Ly. Kajiv Kumar and Dr. Rohit F1 war and had stains on the handle of terrace door which was lockes, y lid alse seen some wiped bloody foots: and wined blood stains on the upper staireas DrRajesh Talwar was asked for the KSys to the terrace four, but inside his residence after having a look at the blooi fained door handle. ‘The blood stained marks on the stairs between the flat of Dr. Rajesh Talwa his terrace were seen by other persons alsa. Police of food stains nd directed the 10 to get it opened but pol open it on 16/05/2008. WRajesh Fahwar hud been instead of was g time in the flat should 5 rch for whe body of Aarushi was brought back to the resi by around ~ 30pm, After ping the body there body laken to the cremation ground in Noida wher Aarushi were carried out, As soon as the vody of Aa! er nation, the staff of Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Dr. Nup alwar, 5 undue haste in thoroughly clea ning the floor and wall: with soap and water. ‘The blood stained mattress on other blood stained articles were carried by then the terra ¢ door locked. they asked for the key of adjacent flat belonging to Shri Puneesh Tandon. The bl: ete. were thrown on the terrace of Shri Puneesh Tandon an Ou 17/5/08, Dr. Rajesh Talwar, Dr. Nupur Talwar, Dr. D: others went to the er hulwar nation eround for collecting th hes were collected and kept in a locker which was rented by Dr. R- Rajesh Talwar and iumily members then returned me a reaching home, after arow dan hour it was decided 1h Raje Dr. Nupur Tawa: will po 10 Macidwar mincdiaic!fie toker and le ion also revealed ihat Dr, Dinesh Talwar, Dr, S hary K.K. Gautam, Reid. DSP wer in conta other singe Dr. Sushi] Chaudhary had contacted Shri: K.K. Gautam on S08 and had told him about the murder of Aarushi. At that time he conveyed eyed the est of Dr: Dinesh Talwar that rape should not ncatianed in the nortem report, 16. That on 17/5/08 morning, Dr. Sushil Chaudhary tele ed Shri K.K vam and it isted that Sh. Gautam should accomp residen ev. Dr. Rajesh Talwar, where Dr. Dinesh Talwar 2 Gautam, in the bedroom of Dr.Rajesh Talwar, to get th the t ace opened through police. Shri K.K, Gautam went & ti ertace door and saw blood stains on the stairs ar nd dra Ss in front o! terrace door. {fe telephonically comtacted local police officers. Afier a few minutes, police redched the terrace and asked for the keys to the lock were told that the keys were not availabiec. The lock of the door was broken. As soon as the door was opened, all those pres. aw that there J. Avbady advanced siage of putrification was seen lying towards the left side ofthe were blood marks on the roof as if a body has been dra roof near the external unit of the air conditioney: The bady was covered with a cooler pane! taken from the cooler situated on the roof. double bed cov: of terrace of Dr. R wes draped on the iron grill segregating the po: Talwar from the other side of the roaf. Immediat | i thea asked to callwuihe back as he within 10-15 minutes, Dz, 5 and on seeing the body he aiso did ngs identity catified by a friend of Hemraj that this was the body of the servant ofr: ho was alleged to have Rajesh Talwar named Hema} immediately after that ieft fr fun away? Dr. Rajesh Talw alongwith Dr. Dinesh Talwar. Investigation relating to postmortem of Aarushi sin: {emm th ollowing facts: Aarushi: whitis vesent inside the h discharye was cervix of deceased Anrushi. The hymen ¢ uted. ‘mshi wae ruptured and was cased Aarushi was unduly 2 vaginal orifice of de cervix was visible. > visible, fo signs of rape we ushi was taken and The whitish dischirve present in the private parts of at reported absenci #8 sent for Patholovical examination. The pathol f spernis. Rigor montis had No signs of'asphysu: were visibleomach of Aarus Doctor found semi digested food in the }0 am in i The time of death was between 12 midnight and i P te typ As per doctors who conducted postmortem there was ‘eupons during assaulvimurder; with one weapon being a heavy bh Weapon and th. other being very shary ¢ was caused first and was sufficie: incised wound on the neck was caused later. blunt injury in respect of Aarushi was on the front nd in the aceipital region between 12 midnight and 1:00 am i sauitim use of wo types of weapons during as weapon being @ heavy blunt weapon and the other being ve d High ment. _, The blunt injury was caused first and was sufficient to ca incised wound on the neck was caused later. No food was found in the stomach of Hem: Ati. mor& ithe Mensical avasurement ot the ueorated wound by sos the victims shows use of same weapon to hit bot AS per the statement of doctors who conducted postmore the neck of both the victims were caused by small and gically tained person in a pree manner, But an expe uted by earlier had concluded the nade by a Khukri. the cut marks cc 1S. During investigation various aspecis of the inv: stigation were clarified and confirmed through Expert opinion. The seer € OF crite Was inspec by an expert from FSI. ( dhinagar. ile repo in which he pointed out that the ime had been committed by someone ver lose to Aarushi. He has also opined that tf femraj was dragged on the roof with a sheet. med that the drag ‘Tom the blood soaked body being dragged after being kepi ark on the roof is Experts from CFSI have also con The experts have measured the golf clubs and huve op! vensions of the stiking surface of the golf clibs. “sblished that the dimensions of the striking sucface of go Scied trom Dr. Rajesh Talwar is identical to the dimensi found on both the victims, % lub no. 5 fons of the injury opinion of the experts is available to estabish that no t “ere available on the undergarments and pyjama of Aarushi of a wet circular mark ‘hi which was not urine. It has also been os eblisheees eeepaeaeee vil ed room was open, The doctors who of both the surgical precision The exper opined that blood of A, med thet whey Aarushi was a, Conducted the post mortem have siat Wistims were caused by small sharp and by a surgically trained Person, ils oF Family members were not found on exhibits collected from the scene of crime. SC DNA could be recovered fom the goir over by Dr. Rajesh Taiwme The importa in the photograpts of the scene of crime, The body of Aarushi was lying undisturty Violent force in the ag Sault, “irushi was found from th any of the Sticks handgd‘ii OME is covered with a blogg drenched shite ay he Sed sheet of Aatiashi's bed dovs not show az = se of violence/force. ‘ing of pyjama of Aarushi ig visible in unti Vi The lower garments of Aarushi apye conditi to be pulled upidow cleavage is visible vi A cular marks of wetness is visible helow the pelvic arce hi on the bed sheet. Howey r, the pyjamas +” have any signs of wet School bag of Aarushi is seen lying near her body without it. The pink coloured pillow pt on the back of the hed ia! ne the blood Pattem area but there is no blood droplets on it. Dragging marks of body of Hemraj towards the outdoor quantity of blood nes the AC is more than the quantity of ore the mark of dragging bowins x The neck of Aarushi was slit later on. _Position of door k of Aarushi’s room was found. unexpluin Parents who were custodian of the key. The bady of Hemraj was dragged to the comer on the roc The bo of Heinraj was covered by panel of'a cooler. The gril! on the roof was vd by a double bed cover, The door to the roof was locked for the frst time in uh tom stair case side. Slood sinined drag marks w seen on the stair case lea war to the terace. Some of the blood ste: ineRUA iescp icant enor ii bo 20. Phe blood on the Pillow of deceased Aarushi 18 draining of blood and another ig Splashes of uyury above the left vebrow shows a Li/Ves horizontal to the body Investigation with reference to the murder apon revesied that 13} Valwer was a member of Golf Club, NOMA, using E80 gol? sticks which were ken iy ais Sane Some time before the incident. the Santro car ofDr. Ra’ shen for servicing! At that time, the driver had taken out both the Go { sticks and had kept them in the room of Hem: setaplis of oom of Hemraj, taken by C ‘SL. on 01.06.08, only ono golf stick ix the other one was found missing. Dr. Rajesh Talwar wus un the missing golf stick while in police custody remandawith Cai, ~ During investigation, on being asked, Dr. Rajesh Talwar handed over the complete golf set comprising of 03 Wooden clubs"(Nos. 1.3 & 5). 07 clubs (Nos. 30 9), 01 iron chub mark Sol" set taken over from De. Rajesh Talwar was sent to "and OF iron putter to CRE, The fluid or blood could be detected on the goit g owing thei dimensions an Was provided to CPSL. ‘The dimenvic "e No. 5 were identical to the dimensions rycca sian ene 2 & 3 appeared to 1 ch so that they were visibly distinct trom the other eo! 1 sticks a golf set was subjected 10 Test identification Pg jesh Talwar i. Shiri Umesh in presence of independ h identified Golf stick No. 4 and 5 as golf stici S which wei by him in the room of Hlemraj. On being asked to reconcile she g golf stick with production of complete golf set, Dr. Rajesh Ta informed that his cousin Aja Chadda and his golf stick in the loft of their residence when..the lofi wes he Dz. Nupur ha a year after the incident: Shri Ajay Chadda, comfinn Dr. Manyur ‘Talwar hud f md one Galf stick in he loft o} sidenc ‘War near the room of Aarushi, thet the golf stick had 2 stee! hea as soon as the golf stick was found in the loft, Dr. Nupur Talwar and Shy Ajay Chadda had seen this go tick to see whether « Blood was ood was golf stick. This “recovery” of the golf sick, from ¢ by either the Tabivars or Shri Ajay Chaddato than a year. anyone i During investigation Dr. Rajesh TahwanygDr, Nupur Talwar, De. Dinos! Telwar, Dr. Sushil Choudhary, Dr: Ritcha Saxeria, suspects. Krishna, 'Raj Kumar & Vijay Mandal wete subjected to tests including Lie Detection Test, Braid! Fingerprinting “lem end Narec Anak Tests. The test results for all the Suspects wer. jound ww be inconclusive, Stigition. COR detail Rajeshieee 0 wound 12.0U midnia! ‘met router remained continuc Plast activity at 3.43 ame when the switched off. Afier that the router has been when aid Bharati reached the residence of De: Talwar made cail on the mobile phone of Hemraj. The opinion of the intemet service. provider as well « switching on/switch n only be done by i) physically or ii) Duc electric sup’ tepariment, there was no power cut particular night, However. the details of interes a on 16/05/2008 shows that the router was switched umber of occasions with long gaps, even when the police were in the apartment. ‘The opinion of experts is ur setivity of router on 16" satisfactori ly. Unexplained rower activ * makes thispiece of evidence not filly reliable. Aarushi used tw remain busy on her mobile till well alter On the night of incident, sometimes upto 1.00 . Some of the frienils of Aarushi had tried to contaét her'é 9p her mobile phone but i Was found switched off One of her friends ‘Anmol k Contact her on the landline numb Tal around 12.00 m Was NO response. This mob Pt le phone went misstnw murder, he phone tuld net be ined till 12.0: vealed that A his phone wes. nund by a house ins days aor the wneident, (he phone was found |s Toute which 1 Wes tit Sadarpur ares 7umber . e and the IME recavered pi were identical, Mowever, the MMC card of memory olf the phone had been cleaned so th data (SMS, My Phone book etc.) reluting to Aarushi was available ir nobile phone. iv. The call details of Hemraj do not show any interact three suspect servants on 155.2008. On 16.5.20008 ai 06.00.01 call has been received for two seconds. The cal] o; reside: fal (elephone number of De. Rajesh per the tower location, this mobi ¢ phone o: hudes the residence of Ir. Rajesh 'g * 02 15.5.2008 De. naiesh Talwar has retumed to his hor PM. On this date, the fast activity on this phone is at 2 »wer location shows that lie was at his resig. 5.2008, the first activity is at 6.19 AM and as pe phone is ia the reside of Dr. Rajesh Talwar, * 155.2008, there is no activity on the mobile ph ‘Talwar after 19.40.07 hes. At that time, the t cation indicates tha’ She wes at her res 01.07.40 hrs, © CDR activity of Dr, Dinesh Talwar reveals his clos lence. Her phone remained £18.5.2008 at : vi Dr. Stishit Choudhary and the loop of calls betwe. Dr. Sushii Choudhary and Shri K.K. Gautam.oe congener eng (oe the erime ia detait, ) Invelvement of intruders, other than = nts, ii) Involvement ofservants, Krishna, Rajkumar & Vijay mi HD Involvement of parents, Aavalvement of intruders The possibility of mvoive ‘ment of intruders other then ring cartier phase of Investigation by up trengthened by various incur stane es showing that th ere was > possibility Pavolvenient of an outsider in this Srime. Some of the circumstences a “No evidence has come forth which to suggest forcible entry outside. b Ve On the part of any outsides ith either Hemraj or Aarushi’s There is nothin S f0 suggest that the outer mos: laicheW/ocked. door kas beer ‘idence has come forth that only the family m, Were last seen the Rouse before the crime and on! d Hemel Hy parents were first Aarushi's door cannot be Spened by an outsider without » key & The Olony examined has stated that no outside: Holme into the house of Tahy, tard of the T Was seen her 'S or com: from their house, No intruder woutd bother to dress of scene of grime he servants was rule hes&. No intrader w ill lock the terrace doar : An intruder is unlikely to take liquor inside e double murder when they know that parents ure sleepiny 4 00% © Hi) Involvement of servants, ‘ During in tigation it was revealed ‘that Krishna shelper/a sant to DrRajesh Talwar in his NOYDA. ¢ domestic servant f De Durrani, a close friend of Dr.Rajesh Bivas a servant of z neighbow fhe flat of DrRajesh T of Dr. Rajesh Talwar and used to live ‘Talwar. During investigation it was revealed that Krishna » coided by DrRajesh Talwar for making a dental cast incorrectly 5 ery agitated on this. It was felt that Krishna alongwith hi hight have committed the erime to take revenge against Dr. Rajesh 7 id Raj Kumar were Nepalis known to Hemraj and had ac ‘ajesh Talwar, their possible role in the ezime was investigated During the’ initial investigation by CBI suspect servants namely rikumar and Vijay Mandal were arrested and intensive investigation was carsied t regard s their possible involvement. However, it was conclu: 's could not have committed the crime for the foll. j There is no evidence against the servants ex: spt the Narco not reliable.viii. ix. | i xi f om i Rremni Was Wok he Police and Landlord K.N. Job pe garage alongwith his family. The garage belong to Shri KN Jo There evidence that family members of Krishna presence at his house during night. There was no interaction on telephone between any of the servants om th day or physical meeting between them, Hemraj was a tectotaler. Servants would not have had the guts to Ds.Talwar when both the doctors were present Presence of Raj Kumar has been explained upto 12.36 AM on that He fed gone to railw Dr.Praful Durrani to fetch tion New Delhi alongwith his em “Anita Durrani. They around 11.30 when Raj Kumar had prepared a meal for Dr. Anita Dut who took the food after 12.00 in the night due to her fast sleep at erottnd 12.30 in the night, Minimum time to reach Aarushi’s house by hveyele is 20 whereas the time of death is between 12.00 to 1.00 AM. So, # impossible for him to have reached the scene of crime within estimated time of assault, ot The house of Dr. Durrani was locked ftom inside by Dr. Durra and it was difficult for Raj Kumar to have got out The Watchmen manning the ante of the Society at both thy niaces did not sea any movement of Rajkumar on that night. There were no phone calls botween Raj Ku Servants, hence. there was no prior conspiracy. Raj Kumar was it known to Vijay Mandal with Krishnaiii) Ny ix) ¢ The entire data on Aurushi's mobile was deleted Normal ¢ would have no need tg do go, When the Police etrived at the SOC on moming of 16.5.2008 thes Were immediately diverted by parents and DrRajesh Talwar jenored the request for providine tty th ck to the terrace even when blood st: Refiused to identify the dead body of Hemraj when it terrace. Request for ton mention oj ape in P-M, proce The call details and statement of Shri K.k Gautam indicate thet detection of dead body of Hemraj was not a meze coineidence. Golf stick which was found missing earlier was laicr detected by the Talwars themselves but this was not intimated to anybody for g year. ‘he facts and circumstances revealed thatthe munier was caused | olf stick which indicates that the assault was initicteson the basis of grave and sudden provocation, St before the postmortem was to begin! Dr. Dine Sul Dohre to tai to some one on phone under.the impression that was talking to Dy Mopra, Head of Forensics, AIMS, New Deli Which sows clear attempt to isfluence the stor doing postmortem,© 6080, fandai had no mobile to communicate xy. Name of Vijay Mandal did not figure even in the Narec xvi, The Khukri in possession of Krishna was bhint edged ad no traces of human blood or fingerprints. xvii. Narco report of Krishna and Raj Kumar had mentior mobile Phone of Aarushi was sent to Nepal whereas the mobile phone of Hemra ‘was destroyed. However, during investigation these revelations found to he incorreet since th mobile phone of Azrushi was revo AIDA and the mobile phone of Hemraj was ‘ou the territory of Punjab. active within xvii, The custodial interrogation of all the three Suspects did not reveal any important discrepancies, ‘involv: a Ltenranhiainieteiemtrnr sete ont of Pareitis (Dr.Rajesh Talwar & Dr. Nupur Talwar), The UP Police during their investigation had suspected Dr.Rafesh | have committed the crime due to grave & sudden provocation on find: daughter in a compromi ing position with Hemraj. Bosed on the investigation conducted by them, UP Police had arrested Dr.Rajesh ‘1 and taken him on Police remand. The investigation by. CBI revealed coriain pecul ¥ Gireumstances which. point towards involvement of the paren the crime. Some of the important facis and iccuuastances are as below: © During pre-test interview at FSi, Gandhinagar, Dr, Rajesh ‘Talwea Nupur Talwar have stated that they used to lock the bedroom Aacushi during night. The door of Aarush 's bed room had ; Submitied please, f \ y Nes (OGL. Keil}, Addi.Supdiof Poli: / CBI, SCH, New Delhi:“[Sh. Sanjay | Magisirate Distt | Budh Nagar, U.P. | Sulianpur, Sec-} | Braces Rageshwari pital Apartinents, -/ Sh. Sankalp Ar Delhi | Sh. Ravinder Kum: Sahay, D/é Shi Rajon ‘Q S/o Sh. Rakésh Arora, R/o 58-1, Delhi RU Gautam, R/o 5 whan PCS, sje Late Or Rk G8 Nagar UP. R/o- G.2 Sh. Bhushan WR/o 522, S6C-37. Noi Vasundhara, Dethi actinar Singh, R/o ard doz Bi il Noida, U.P,24. | Sh. Ram Visi under Lal, R/o C/o Sh. Rakes! | Complex, Nithati, Noida, U.P. 25. | Sh. Digambar Singh, S/o Sh Pant Sin: Distt-Farid Chaysa, Haryana. 26. Sh. Umesh Kumar Sharma, S/o Sh, Shibar, Kishan near Sharma Market, Village Cha | _|.22, Noida. ad ‘| 27.| Const. Pawan Kure W/o Sh. Ajay 40, Police colony, Noida. am Swaroop Gat an, Magi .| Smi. Kalpana Mandal, W/o Sanjay) Market, 5: ida, . | Dr. Chander Bhushan Singh, S/o Sh. MAMC, R/o Dr. 1 Nithari, Sec-31, Noida. _— | Sh. Deepak Kanda, Nodal Officer Bharti ‘Okhia indi. Estate, New Delhi-20.- -| Shi RK. Singh, (Nodal Officer), Bharlf A late M. K. Narayanan, Nd shy Sar, Main M4. k Tomar S/o Shi $. $. Tom C-45, Phase-il, Oxia Indusiric! nda Singh Aw: Scientist information Tec! Lodhi Road, Delt s/o Laie Shyam «. S/o Shri Ganeshi | Hydel Colony, Plot No. / R/O H.No-377All S/o bd. Islam An ~~48. | Sh. Ram Darshan Sharma New Ashok Nagar, uwat S/o Sh. Jagr Sh. Shafigoor Rehman S/o Shi Su lats, Maghuban Apariment, Sh. Byas, S/o Sh.Balkishan, Sadareo Colony, Noid Sh. Kaahing Joni R/o ROL. 14, Sec. Sh. Bhim Bahadur Thapa S/o Late Bhakic 2 | Jalvayy Vihar, Sec-25, Noida. . = 33. 3 4 njade S/o Chic Exin. Bhojanpura, N.! ev, Sto Sh GW, ‘. ['sh. CK ‘oy s/o Late Ramesh Chander 4/66, Sex “C/o Jagadish Che oy R/O M288, Sec: