Vinay Research Paper

Efficacy of certain agrochemicals application at field rates on
microbial count of rhizospheric soil in Maize

M.G. Patil, V.S. Kolhe and R.R. Tamboli, Directorate of Weed Science Research
Centre, MAU, Parbhani.
E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT:
The efficacy of three different agrochemicals (two herbicides and one
fungicide) and bioinoculant was carried out to determine their effects on the
physicochemical and biological properties of rhizospheric soil in Maize field.
Here, the representative soil samples for every treatment plots were collected for
estimation of total fungal and bacterial count. The colony forming units (CFU)
and total viable counts of total soil fungi and total soil bacteria were determined
by means of serial dilution technique and pore plant method after 30, 50 days of
sowing and at harvest of agrochemicals application in Maize field. The estimated
data indicated that agrochemicals used affected the microbial count of
rhizospheric soil in treated plots compared with the untreated soil. The total
fungal count was minimized in herbicide treated plots as compared to control
treatment. On the other hand, the plots in which seeds were treated with
Azospirillum showed maximum bacterial count as compared with control plot.
KEYWORDS: Agrochemicals, bioinoculant, microbial count, Azospirillum,

Rhizosphere and Maize.
INTRODUCTION:
If the global Maize production is examined, it is inferred that USA
has the lion’s share in total global Maize production accounting almost half of
the world’s harvest (~42.5 percent), other top producing countries includes The
Peoples Republic Of China, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, India and France.
Worldwide production was around 800 million tonnes in 2007. In this year
(2007), over 150 million hectare of Maize was planted worldwide with a yield of
4970.9 kilogram per hectare. India is the fifth largest producer of Maize in the
world contributing 3 percent of the global production. In the last five decades,
India’s Maize production has increased from less than three million tonnes to 15
million tonnes today (2006-07). Maize, like any other cereal is grown across all
the states in India and in many states it is one of the important staple foods.
Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh are the leading producers of Maize in India while
Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan are the
other important producers. According to the Union Ministry of Agriculture, as
on 10th July 2006, area brought under Maize in India was 35.22 lakh hectares up
from 27.36 lakh hectares planted during the corresponding period last year.
Maharashtra State holds prominent rank consisting total area under Maize to be
3,71,000 hectares with annual production of 7,44,000 tonnes and productivity of
2,000 Kg/ha in India (FAO, 2004). Microbial activity i s t h e g e n e r a l term
use d to indicate the vast range of activities carried out by soil
microorganisms Landi et al., (2000). It is markedly influenced by changes in
environmental factors and soil conditions Bloem et al., (2006). Biological
parameters may rapidly reflect even small changes that occur in soil,
providing accurate data about soil quality Smith and Papendick, ( 1 9 9 3 ) .
Pascual et al., ( 2 0 0 0 ) . Soil microorganisms, particularly soil fungi,
represent a biogeosphere component determining the level of their real
toxic effect, since they take part in their detoxification and mineralization,
using them as carbon and energy sources Dukia and Mandia (1998),
Nunez e t a l., (2001). Fungicides applied perform inhibition of soil fungi
development during the first two months following their application
Mandia et al. (2005). Recently, Zhao et al (2008) stated that the application
of elemental sulphur (30 mg/kg 2) increased the amount of soil
microorganism (bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes), and enhance soil
microbial activity. Das and Mukherjee (1998)., stated that, the
Hexachlorocyclohexane (BHC) followed by phorate significantly
stimulated the populations of (total) bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi and
aerobic non-sym biotic N 2 -fixing bacteria in soil.
MATERIAL AND METHOD:

The present investigations were carried out in field as well as in
laboratory at DWSR Centre, MAU, Parbhani. The seeds of Maize (Karveer)
used for sowing in field experiment. The agrochemicals like fungicide
(Mancozeb), herbicide (Atrazine) and Azospirillum were used with different
dosage. The rhizospheric soil was used for laboratory experiment at different
observation time.
Media used:
Different semi-solid media were used for different microorganisms.

Nutrient agar for estimation of bacteria and Martin Rose Bengal agar media for
estimation of fungi (Pepper et al.., 1995)
Microbial analysis:
After application of agrochemicals at 1 DAS, 30 DAS and at 50 DAS in

treated plots. The total number of fungi and bacteria were counted. The number
of colony forming units (cfu) in the selective media were determined by means
of serial dilution technique and the pour plate method (Salle, 1973). Analysis
were done in three replicates.
Serial Dilution:
First prepared series of dilution blanks consisting of sterile water. For

each series, 250 ml conical flasks containing 90 ml of sterile water and 8-10 test
tubes containing 9 ml distilled water were required. Transfer 1 gm of soil sample
in 9 ml sterile distilled water in test tube (10-1) and shake properly. Transfer 1 ml
of suspension from this tube to another tube containing 9 ml of sterile distilled
water (10-2). Again transfer 1 ml of suspension from this tube to another tube
containing 9 ml sterile distilled water (10 -3). Similar dilution process was
continued as per requirements i.e. 10-4 for bacteria and 10-6 for fungi.
Pour plate method:

Using fresh sterile micro pipette, pour 1 ml aliquot from the last dilution
into each of the three Petri dishes. After this, poured approximately 20 ml
volume of molten medium in each of the plates. Immediately after pouring,
gently moved the plates in a whirling motion to mix the contents, then allowed
the medium to solidify and incubate in BOD incubator at 30 0 + 2 0C in inverted
position.
Calculation of total viable count:
After proper incubation period, the number of colonies per plate was
recorded by digital colony counter. Total viable counts used are calculated by
formula
Total viable count = Avg. No. of colonies X Size of aliquot X Dilution factor.
RESULTS:
The present investigation is an attempt to check the effect of different

agro-chemicals on microbial count in relation to chickpea rhizosphere. The study
was conducted in field and in laboratory of Directorate of Weed Science
Research Centre, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani. Result of these
experiments compiled, statistically analyzed and is presented in this chapter.
Effect of agrochemicals on microbial count of soil in relation to Maize

rhizosphere.
Effect of agrochemicals on total fungal count in Maize rhizosphere.
Table 1 Total fungal count.
Total Fungal Count
Tr. (cfu x 104)

Treatment
No. 30 50 At
DAS DAS harvest
T1 Weedy Check 35.33 38.66 47.66
T2 Mechanical weeding 25.00 35.00 45.33
T3 Atrazine @ 0.75 Kg/Ha 26.33 33.00 40.00
T4 Atrazine @ 1.50 Kg/Ha 26.66 34.00 43.00
Atrazine @ 0.75 Kg/Ha + 2,4-D @ 0.5
T5 32.00 33.66 42.66
Kg/Ha
T6 Mancozeb @ 0.5 % 24.00 28.33 34.66
T7 Mancozeb @ 0.2 % 27.00 32.00 38.00
Seed Treatment with Azospirillum @
T8 30.66 35.66 39.00
250g/ 10 Kg seeds
SE ± 0.97 1.09 1.09
CD at 5% 2.95 3.32 3.32
In the above table, maximum fungal count was observed in treatment (T 1)

i.e., Weedy Check at 30 DAS (35.33), 50 DAS (38.66) and at harvest (47.66),
whereas minimum fungal count was noticed in treatment (T 6) i.e. Mancozeb @
0.5 % at 30 DAS (24.00), at 50 DAS (28.33) and at harvest (34.66).
Effect of agrochemicals on total bacterial count in Maize rhizosphere.
Table 2 Total bacterial count.
Total Bacterial Count
Tr. (cfu x 106)

Treatment
No. 30 50 At
DAS DAS harvest
T1 Weedy Check 49.00 52.33 55.00
T2 Mechanical weeding 47.33 50.00 53.33
T3 Atrazine @ 0.75 Kg/Ha 42.00 45.33 49.00
T4 Atrazine @ 1.50 Kg/Ha 43.33 45.00 49.00
Atrazine @ 0.75 Kg/Ha + 2,4-D @ 0.5
T5 46.00 49.33 51.66
Kg/Ha
T6 Mancozeb @ 0.5 % 44.00 46.00 48.66
T7 Mancozeb @ 0.2 % 42.66 45.66 49.00
Seed Treatment with Azospirillum @
T8 53.33 56.00 57.66
250g/ 10 Kg seeds
SE ± 1.53 1.39 1.71
CD at 5% 4.66 4.22 5.20
In the table mentioned above, total bacterial count found maximum at 30

DAS, 50 DAS and at harvest in treatment (T 8) i.e. seed treatment with
Azospirillum @ 250g/ 10 Kg seeds, which were (53.33), (56.00) and (57.66)
respectively. On the other hand, minimum total bacterial count was noticed at 30
DAS (42.00) in treatment (T3) i.e. Atrazin @ 0.75 Kg/Ha, followed by treatment
(T4) i.e. Atrazin @ 1.50 Kg/Ha at 50 DAS (45.00) and finally treatment (T 6) i.e.
Mancozeb @ 0.5 % at harvest (48.66).
DISCUSSION:
In present investigations, the rhizospheric soil samples in Maize plants

were taken from different agrochemical treatment plots from Maize field. The
maximum fungal population was observed in control plot (T 1) at 30 DAS, 50
DAS and at harvest, while most of the treatments were recovered. Herbicides
treated plots at recommended rates resulted lower fungal count compared to
control plots. Also, lowest fungal count observed in treatment (T6) i.e. Mancozeb
@ 0.5 % followed by (T7) i.e. Mancozeb @ 0.2 % due to fungicidal action.
Fungal count was minimum at 30 DAS followed by 50 DAS.
Similar results were obtained by several research workers (Houseworth
and Tweedy, 1973; Cole, 1976; Hamed et al.., 1980; Frioni, 1981; Shukla et al..,
1990; Thopate et al.., 1990; Martinez Toledo et al.., 1998; Vazquez et al.., 2000;
Jose et al.., 2002; Khan and Ahmed, 2002; Aggarwal et al.., 2005; Hu et al..,
2005; Jose et al.., 2005; Ayansina and Oso, 2006; Huang et al.., 2006 (a); Huang
et al., 2006 (b); Cycon and Piotrowska, 2007; Jose et al., 2007; Ghany and
Ahmed, 2009)
In case of bacterial count, significantly highest bacterial count was

observed in treatment (T2) i.e. mechanical weeding followed by treatment (T 8)
i.e. seed treatment with Azospirillum @ 250/ 10 Kg seeds. On the other hand,
minimum total bacterial count was noticed at 30 DAS (42.00) in treatment (T 3)
i.e. Atrazin @ 0.75 Kg/Ha, followed by treatment (T 4) i.e. Atrazin @ 1.50 Kg/Ha
at 50 DAS (45.00) and finally treatment (T 6) i.e. Mancozeb @ 0.5 % at harvest
(48.66). Due to higher dose of Mancozeb (0.5 %), the fungal population along
with bacterial population got inhabited. On the other hand, in treatment (T 8) i.e.
seed treatment with Azospirillum @ 250/ 10 Kg seeds was strictly followed
without any interference of other agrochemicals. Hence overall microbial
population enhanced. Also, similar results were also reported by research
workers (Houseworth and Tweedy, 1973; Kapulnik et al.., 1981; Sarig et al..,
1983; Shukla et al.., 1990; Thopte et al.., 1990; Hernandez et al.., 1997; Krol
and Kobus, 1997; Burdman et al., 1997; Jacoud et al.., 1999; Vazquez et al.,
2000; Khan and Ahmed, 2002; Piutti et al.., 2003)
REFERENCES:
Cole, M.A. (1976). Effect of long term atrazine application on soil microbial
activity. Weed Sci, 24(5):473-476.
Hamed AS, Mahmoud SA, Zaki MM, Sahab AF (1980). The effct of the
herbicide atrazine on rhizospheric microflora of broad mbean
plants infested with Fusarium oxisporum f. fabae and Rhizoctonia
solani. Zentralbl Bakteriol Naturwiss, 135(1):60-9.
Frioni L. (1981). Effect of Atrazin, linuron and 2, 4-D amine on various
biological properties of soil sample. I- Field trial. Rev. Argent.
Microbiol., 13(1):1-8.
Kapulnik, Y., Kigel, J., Okon, Y., Nur and Henis, Y. (1981). Effect of
Azospirillum Inoculation on some growth parameters and N-
content of Wheat, Sorghum and Panicum. Plant and Soil, 61:65-70.
Sarig, S., Kapulnik, I., Nur and Okon, Y. (1983). Response of non-irrigated
Sorghum bicolor to Azospirillum Inoculation. Soil. Biol. and
Biochem, 29(5):923-929.
Shukla D. S., Chaturvedi R. and Shrivastav S. K. (1990). Effect of various

fungicides on microbial population of soil and some soil factors. J.
Environ. Biol., 11(3):291-298.
Hernandez,-A; Hernandez,-A-N; Calzadilla,-M (1997). Identification of

Azospirillum sp. strains isolated from maize rhizosphere. Cultivos-
Tropicales. 18(2): 5-7.
Krol,-M-J; Kobus,-J (1997). Occurrence of bacteria of the genus Azospirillum in

the rhizosphere of maize and Barley grown on different soils.
Zeszyty-Naukowe-Akademii-Rolniczej-w-Szczecinie,-Rolnictwo. 68:
141-151.
Saul Burdman, Jaime Kigel and Yaacov Okon (1997). Effects of Azospirillum
brasilense on growth of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).
Soil. Biol. and Biochem, 29(6):923-929.
Colette Jacoud, Dominique Job, Patrick Wadoux and Rene Bally (1999).
Initiation of root growth stimulation by Azospirillum lipoferum
CRT1 during maize seed germination. Can. J. Microbiol.
45(4):339-342.
Mar-Vazquez,-M; Cesar,-S; Azcon,-R; Barea,-J-M (2000). Interactions between
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and other microbial inoculants
(Azospirillum, Pseudomonas, Trichoderma) and their effects on
microbial population and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of
maize plants. Applied-Soil-Ecology. 15(3): 261-272.
Houseworth, L.D. and Tweedy, B.G. (2001). Effect of Atrazin in combination

with captan or thiram upon fungal and bacterial populations in the
soil. Public Health Service Research Centre, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jose-Miguel Barea, Rosario Azcon and Concepcion Azcon-Aguilar (2002).

Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant fitness and soil
quality. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 81:343-351.
Piutti,-S; Hallet,-S; Rousseaux,-S; Philippot,-L; Soulas,-G; Martin-Laurent,-F

(2002). Accelerated mineralisation of atrazine in Maize
rhizosphere soil. Biology-and-Fertility-of-Soils. 36(6): 434-441.
Piutti,-S; Semon,-E; Landry,-D; Hartmann,-A; Dousset,-S; Lichtfouse,-E; Topp,-

E; Soulas,-G; Martin-Laurent,-F (2003). Isolation and
characterisation of Nocardioides sp. SP12, an Atrazine-degrading
bacterial strain possessing the gene trzN from bulk- and maize
rhizosphere soil. FEMS-Microbiology-Letters. 221(1): 111-117.
Ashok Aggarwal, Dipti Sharma, Vipin Prakash, Seema Sharma and Anil Gupta
(2005). Effect of Bavistin and Diethane M-45 on the Mycorrhizae
and Rhizosphere microbes of Sunflower. Institute of field and
vegetable Crops, Oil Crops Department, University of Novi Sad.
Hu J, Dai X, Li S. (2005). Effects oof atrazine and its degrader Exiguobacterium
sp. BTAH1 on soil microbial community. Ying Yong Sheng Tai
Xue Bao, 16(8):1518-22.
Jose-Miguel Barea, Maria Jose Poso, Rosario Azcon and Concepcion Azcon-
Aguilar (2005). Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere.
Departamento de Microbiologia del Suelo y Sistemas Simbioticos,
Estacion Experimental del Zaidin, CSIC, Granada, Spain.
Ayansina A. D. V. and Oso B. A. (2006). Effect of two commonly used

herbicides on soil microflora at two different concentrations.
African J. Biotechnol., 5(2):129-132.
Huang H, Zhang S, Chen BD, Wu N, Shan XQ, Christy P. (2006). Uptake of

atrazine and cadmium from soil by Maize (Zea mays L.) in
association with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus
etunicatum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54(25):9377-82.
Cycon, M. and Piotrowska Seget Z. (2007). Effect of selected pesticides on soil

microflora involved in organic matter and nitrogen transformation:
Pot experiment. Polish J. Ecol., 55(2): 207- 220.
Huang H, Zhang S, Shan XQ, Chen BD, Zhu YG, Bell JN (2007). Effect of
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus caledonium) on the
accumulation and metabolism of Atrazin in Maize (Zea mays L.)
and Atrazin dissipation in soil. Environ. Pollut. 146(2):452-7.
Jose L. Moreno, Asuncion Aliaga, Simon Navarro, Teresa Hernandez and Carlos
Garcia (2007). Effect of Atrazine on microbial activity in semi-arid
soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 35(1):120-127.
ABD EL-GHANY, T.M. and Ahmed, A. Tayel (2009). Efficacy of certain

agrochemicals application at field rates on soil fungi and their
ultrastructures. Research J. of Agril. And Biol. Sci, 5(2): 150- 160.

Vinay Research Paper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vinay Research Paper

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vinay Research Paper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Efficacy of certain agrochemicals application at field rates on

microbial count of rhizospheric soil in Maize

KEYWORDS: Agrochemicals, bioinoculant, microbial count, Azospirillum,

MATERIAL AND METHOD:

Different semi-solid media were used for different microorganisms.

After application of agrochemicals at 1 DAS, 30 DAS and at 50 DAS in

First prepared series of dilution blanks consisting of sterile water. For

Pour plate method:

Calculation of total viable count:

The present investigation is an attempt to check the effect of different

Effect of agrochemicals on microbial count of soil in relation to Maize

Total Fungal Count

Tr. (cfu x 104)

In the above table, maximum fungal count was observed in treatment (T 1)

Effect of agrochemicals on total bacterial count in Maize rhizosphere.

Table 2 Total bacterial count.

Total Bacterial Count

Tr. (cfu x 106)

In the table mentioned above, total bacterial count found maximum at 30

In present investigations, the rhizospheric soil samples in Maize plants

In case of bacterial count, significantly highest bacterial count was

Shukla D. S., Chaturvedi R. and Shrivastav S. K. (1990). Effect of various

Hernandez,-A; Hernandez,-A-N; Calzadilla,-M (1997). Identification of

Krol,-M-J; Kobus,-J (1997). Occurrence of bacteria of the genus Azospirillum in

Houseworth, L.D. and Tweedy, B.G. (2001). Effect of Atrazin in combination

Jose-Miguel Barea, Rosario Azcon and Concepcion Azcon-Aguilar (2002).

Piutti,-S; Hallet,-S; Rousseaux,-S; Philippot,-L; Soulas,-G; Martin-Laurent,-F

Piutti,-S; Semon,-E; Landry,-D; Hartmann,-A; Dousset,-S; Lichtfouse,-E; Topp,-

Ayansina A. D. V. and Oso B. A. (2006). Effect of two commonly used

Huang H, Zhang S, Chen BD, Wu N, Shan XQ, Christy P. (2006). Uptake of

Cycon, M. and Piotrowska Seget Z. (2007). Effect of selected pesticides on soil

ABD EL-GHANY, T.M. and Ahmed, A. Tayel (2009). Efficacy of certain

You might also like