Republic of The Marshall Islands Office of The Maritime Administrator

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

REPUBLIC OF

THE MARSHALL ISLANDS

Marine Guideline
No. 2-11-2

OFFICE OF THE
MARITIME ADMINISTRATOR

10/06

TO:

ALL SHIPOWNERS, OPERATORS, MASTERS AND OFFICERS OF


MERCHANT SHIPS, AND RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATIONS

SUBJECT:

Bulk Carriers Guidelines on Early Assessment of Hull Damage.

Reference:

MSC/Circ.1143

PURPOSE:
This Marine Guideline addresses the issue of bulk carriers which may not withstand flooding
of any one cargo hold and provides information on the action to be taken in case of flooding of such
holds, with a view to improving the precautionary measures and procedures for emergencies on
board these ships. This Guideline supersedes previously numbered Marine Notice 2-011-21 in the
original issue of 1/05.
APPLICABILITY:
This Guideline should be applied by Companies, as defined in the ISM Code, that operate
such bulk carriers and to the Masters of such bulk carriers. This advice applies equally to ships
other than bulk carriers when carrying dense cargoes.
REQUIREMENTS:
1.0

Guidelines on early assessment of hull damage and possible need for abandonment of bulk
carriers are set out at Annex. Some common causes of hull damage are contained in the
Appendix to the Annex.

2.0

Companies are reminded that emergency contingency planning forms an integral part of the
International Safety Management Code required by SOLAS Chapter IX. They should
therefore assess the actual risk to their ships with consideration of the information given in
the following Guidelines and provide in their Safety Management System appropriate advice
to assist the Master in assessing the action to take in a situation involving flooding of the
ship while at the same time making sure that the professional judgment of the Master is not
undermined.
This ship specific guidance should also be brought to the attention of all crew members
during familiarization training.

3.0

Companies are reminded again that the Master is the one who decides on whether or not the
ship is to be abandoned. The guidance is provided to assist the Master in making that
decision based on the overriding principle that human life is more important than property.
1 of 6

Inquiries concerning the subject of this Guideline should be directed to the Office of the Maritime Administrator, Republic of the Marshall
Islands, c/o Marshall Islands Maritime and Corporate Administrators, Inc., 11495 Commerce Park Drive, Reston, VA 20191-1507 USA.
MI-03, 9/06

ANNEX
GUIDELINES ON EARLY ASSESSMENT OF HULL DAMAGE AND
POSSIBLE NEED FOR ABANDONMENT OF BULK CARRIERS
1
Provoked by the disappearance and loss of a number of bulk carriers from mid 1970s
onwards the international shipping community has grown increasingly concerned that such ships are
particularly vulnerable to rapid loss. Consequently, IMO has been taking action over the years to
address this problem and to find appropriate solutions. Among such actions, the Organization has
adopted amendments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention, by introducing chapter XII in 1997 (amended in
2002), and other related provisions in chapter II-1, and has also amended the Guidelines on the
enhanced programme of inspections during surveys of bulk carriers and oil tankers (resolution
A.744(18)) on several occasions. More recently, a number of formal safety assessment (FSA) studies
on bulk carrier safety have been carried out. From these studies, the Maritime Safety Committee of
IMO concluded at its seventy-sixth session in December 2002 that bulk carriers do deserve continued
special attention, and a number of measures were approved to address the issues identified, both
structural and operational.
2
Records of bulk carrier losses indicated, in a large proportion of the cases studied, that ships
masters often appeared to be unaware of the imminent danger they were in. Many lost their lives
together with the other seafarers on board as a consequence. Ship losses were frequently so rapid
that the ship did not have time to send a distress signal.
3
The records studied show that in the event of loss of hull integrity, in many cases, bulk
carriers should be evacuated as quickly as possible. EARLY ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION
IS THEREFORE IMPERATIVE, COMBINED WITH ALERTING A MARITIME RESCUE COORDINATION CENTRE, ALERTING ALL PERSONNEL ONBOARD AND MAKING
PREPARATIONS FOR EVACUATION. This is of particular importance for single skin bulk
carriers which may not be capable of withstanding flooding of any cargo hold.
4
Companies should consider the following advice carefully with a view to improving their
own precautionary measures and procedures for emergencies. The advice applies equally to ships
other than bulk carriers when carrying dense cargoes.
Heavy cargoes
5
In most cases in which bulk carriers have been lost, heavy cargoes such as iron and other
dense ores are a common factor. Ships are also vulnerable when carrying certain break-bulk cargoes
such as steel products. This could include other ship types. The small volume taken up by the cargo in
the ships holds results in a large unoccupied space. This provides potential in a flooding scenario for
large volumes of water to rapidly destroy the ships residual buoyancy and, in the case of smaller
vessels, its stability. Larger vessels are also highly susceptible to structural failure due to increases of
weights caused by the influx of water.
6
Heavy cargoes place high loads on the structure, and structural failure is therefore more
probable when subjected to the additional forces associated with flooding.

10/06

2 of 6
The Republic of the Marshall Islands

MG-2-11-2

Structure
7
Deterioration of structure through corrosion, fatigue and damage is identified as a principal
factor in the loss of many bulk carriers. Failing to identify such deterioration may lead to sudden and
unexpected failure. Bulk carrier crews may be unaware of the vulnerability of these vessel types.
The consequential loss of a ship carrying heavy cargo can be expected to be very rapid, should a
major failure occur.
Forward flooding
8
Spaces forward of the collision bulkhead will, in the event of flooding, significantly affect the
trim of the ship and reduce freeboard at the bow. In extreme weather this further threatens the ship as
green seas come inboard and impact on hatch covers and other fittings that protect the water or
weathertight integrity of the ship. Shell plating in the region of the bow protects the fore peak tank and
other spaces as do air pipes and ventilators. If any of them are damaged the ships ability to resist
further escalation of flooding is compromised.
Early assessment
9
When it occurs or is likely to occur, masters should quickly assess damage to their ships by
being alert to water ingress and its consequences. The following guidelines are given to assist them in
this assessment.
Unusual motion or attitude
10
If a ship takes on an unusual trim or heel, or if her motions become changed, breach of the hull
envelope should be suspected immediately:
Unusual collections of water on decks may be indicating trim or heel abnormality.
Sudden changes of heel or trim will indicate flooding or in smaller ships with lighter
cargoes it may indicate cargo shift.
Jerky lateral motions can be indicative of large scale sloshing as would be the case if a hold
were flooded.
On smaller ships, slowing of the ships roll period may indicate excessive water within the
hull - a serious threat to stability. Ships fitted with GM meters should be able to identify
any unexpected changes in GM.
Increases of water boarding forward decks may indicate flooding of a forward
compartment. Trim and freeboard changes are notoriously difficult to assess from an after
bridge.

10/06

3 of 6
The Republic of the Marshall Islands

MG-2-11-2

11

Methods of detection
Hatch covers may be dislodged by pressure and/or sloshing from within a hold if
flooding occurs through side shell or bulkhead.
Sudden pressuri zation of compartments adjoining those that are damaged or flooded will
indicate failure of intern al subdivision, most notably bulkheads.
Spaces may be monitored, either using gauging or bilge/water level alarms. Forward
store spaces can also be monitored audibly using talkback telephones that may be fitted in
forward spaces. Anchor impacts and water in the space can be detected using telephones
of the type that remain active until switched off from the bridge.
Hull Stress Monitors, where fitted, may be able to detect unexpected longitudinal hull
girder bending. Torsional stresses may also be detected through differential changes
between port an d starboard strain gauges.
Visual monitori ng fr om the bridge using binoculars, where fitted, by closed circuit
television, can give indication of abnormal water on deck an d local damage. However,
assessment of tri m or fr eeboard using this method is difficult.
Assessment of trim chan ges can in cert ain conditions be detected by noting the level of the
hori zon, when visible, against a known reference point on the foremast.
Draught and trim can be assessed using draught gauges. Changes are much more
discernible using this method than by visual means from above decks.

Early readiness for evacuation


12
In the event of identifying or even suspecting that the ship may have sustained damage,
ships personnel should immediately be called to their emergency stations. A HIGH PRIORITY
SHOULD BE PLACED ON PREPARING EQUIPMENT FOR EVACUATION. Abandonment
should however only be invoked on the spoken orders of the master following assessment of the risk.
13
Contact with a Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre (MRCC) an d/or owners should be
made early if the master has any suspicion that the ship is damaged. An URGENCY signal is
justified an d this should be upgraded to DISTRESS if the ship is confirmed as damaged.
Training
14
Masters should place a strong emphasis on evacuation training so that donning of protective
suits and lifejackets, launching of survival craft, and operation of EPIRBs and SARTs is a familiar
process to all ships personnel. Also included should be shutdown procedures for main and auxiliary
machinery, which can, if left running, hinder launching of survival craft.

10/06

4 of 6
The Republic of the Marshall Islands

MG-2-11-2

Investigation
15
Masters may wish to investigate any suspected water ingress more closely but preparations
for evacuating the ship should be made WITHOUT DELAY and concurrent with any investigation.
Remote methods of observation are preferable to sending personnel onto decks, particularly in bad
weather and/or at night. Deck floodlights should be used if necessary to try and identify
abnormalities. Detrimental effects on watchkeepers night vision are of secondary importance in
such circumstances.
16
In circumstances deemed justifiable for sending personnel onto decks that may be frequently
awash with green water, at least two personnel should go to investigate. They should wear harnesses
that attach them to a lifeline and to each other and should be in constant (radio) communication with
the bridge. Each harness should be provided with two easily operated clips so that wearers are
always attached to the ships structure, even when passing across from one lifeline or structural
attachment to another. Lifelines on both sides of the deck should be rigged at all times and progress
along the deck should always be via the lee or sheltered side. When weather conditions deteriorate is
not the time to begin rigging such measures. Fencing or shipside rails alone should not be relied
upon without attachment by harness.
17
When a loss of hull integrity is known or suspected, personnel should not be sent onto decks
that are being regularly submerged or deeply awash. In such circumstances the ship should be
regarded as in imminent danger and priority should be given to preparations for evacuation.
Collision
18
In the event of a collision, masters should call the ships personnel to emergency stations
with a strong emphasis on preparing to evacuate the ship. This is particularly important and urgent in
cases where a ship is loaded with dense bulk cargo1. Older designs of bulk carriers and small ships
with fewer holds are particularly prone to sudden progressive flooding if the damage occurs abaft any
strengthened bulkheads in the forward part of the ship. This type of damage is more probable
resulting from collisions in dense traffic or overtaking manoeuvres.
Safety and survival
19
In the circumstances highlighted above, particular emphasis has been placed on being ready
for early evacuation or abandonment of the vessel. For ships carrying high-density cargoes this is of
importance while they are at sea. There may however be cases where abandonment may be the
worst option and for bulk carriers as with other ship types this is most probably true in the event of
grounding. In close proximity to shore, and especially in bad weather, life-saving craft launched
from the ship are unlikely to save the occupants from the perils of the shoreline and the process of
launching the craft probably carries much greater danger than remaining on board. Again, early
contact with a Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre is important and the master should not hesitate to
broadcast an Urgency or Distress message. When aground and although the ship may be severely
damaged or broken in two, the accommodation blocks in such strandings usually survive long
enough for helicopter evacuation, as organized and co-ordinated by the Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre, when weather conditions abate.
1 Dense cargo should be understood as bulk ores that do not contact sides or bulkheads but should also include certain breakbulk cargoes such as steel products, which share similar characteristics.

10/06

5 of 6
The Republic of the Marshall Islands

MG-2-11-2

APPENDIX
Causes of damage and failure
1
Damage to side shell, externally through contact with docksides or tugs and, internally from
impact by cargo dislodging equipment during discharge, can result in initiating fractures and/or
fatigue of the structure. In single side-skin bulk carriers, bulkheads, trunks and ballast tank
boundaries, can present hard spots that concentrate forces where the change in construction occurs
(e.g. longitudinal to transverse framing). This may lead to undetected fractures.
2
Internal degradation through corrosion may be accelerated through chemical action from
certain cargoes. Welds in particular may be subject to grooving corrosion, in which the material
forming the weld corrodes at a faster rate than the plating to which it is attached. Fatigue failure may
result due to loss of cross-sectional area in the plating joints.
3
In ballast holds, sloshing forces due to partially filled spaces (such as may occur when
changing ballast for environmental reasons) may result in damage to the structure. This damage may
go unnoticed if it is in inaccessible positions. Sloshing is also a known cause of secondary damage
after a space has become flooded.
4
Damage to bow plating such as is possible through impacts associated with swinging or
loosely stowed anchors may cause an initiating fracture or fatigue in bow shell plating that could
lead to failure and subsequent flooding. Internal integrity of forward spaces (that are usually used for
ballast and/or stores) is therefore of vital importance. Corrosion degradation will seriously reduce
the ability of plating and stiffening to withstand the forces to which it will be subjected. In larger
ships, partially filled forepeak tanks may set up destructive sloshing forces unless the tank structure
is designed for this.
5
External forces - horizontal and/or vertical - may cause hatch cover dislodgement. The cargo
hatchway, if it loses its protection in this way, is a major access for water ingress and a serious threat to
the integrity of the hull.

10/06

6 of 6
The Republic of the Marshall Islands

MG-2-11-2

You might also like