Opcvl Paragraphs Humanities
Opcvl Paragraphs Humanities
Opcvl Paragraphs Humanities
copied and used at the end of the movie Pearl Harbor. One value of this quote is
that it is foreshadowing what is going to happen between Japan and America. We
now know about the atomic bombs dropped in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, but in
the movie the people did not know and therefore foreshadows what will happen if
the movie would have been continued. One limitation of the quote is that it was
never actually said or written by the Admiral, so it could be completely
misinterpreted view of the Japanese after the attack. For example this quote lets
the view think, that Japan regretted their attack on Pearl Harbor, which might not
have been the case though. Nevertheless the quote is from the view of the
Japanese which is a value, because there are not many sources about the
Japanese view. But the main problem with this it that it gives us false idea of what
might have been thought by the Japanese. Overall this is a false representor of
the war and its consequences and could lead to false interpretations, though very
accurate in foreshadowing events.
This is a cartoon explaining the cause of the attack on Pearl Harbor. The
cartoonist of this piece is unknown, as well as the main purpose,
but one might suggest, that it was made to inform the
world why the attack on Pearl Harbor was made. One
value of this piece would be that it explains the
embargo on Japan that was made by America.
Nevertheless this piece is very biased, because it makes
the US
the villain and makes Japan the good guys. The carton
explains how America embargoed Japan and cot off their
oil
sources, because the oil belonged to them. One value
of
this piece would be that it clearly shows how during
World War Two Japan relayed on the American for their oil, to
power their war machines. It also shows the reader, how without America, Japan
would not have been able to be such a strong participant in the war. Another
value of this source would be that is explains to the reader, that the attack on
Pearl Harbor was revenge for the embargo. Overall the piece is very help if
studying the battle, because it explains the cause very simply.
This is an American newspaper article published 7 th December 1941. This was on
the day of the attack on Pearl Harbor. It is a newspaper from the city Honolulu.
The cause of this article was after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, to explain
to the US citizens that war had been declared and that America was now part of
World War Two. One value of this newspaper is that explains in detail what
happened at the attack and it has the list of deaths and injured. On the other
hand one limitation of this piece is that it was from the perspective of the
Americans. The article might have been exaggerate and changed, so that the
citizens find the situation much worse than it is and also to make them hate
Japan. This article might have been used as a piece of propaganda, to make
Americans join the war. One limitation of this newspaper is, that it does not have
the exact amount of deaths, because it was published right after the attack and
now it is known that not only six people died during the attack. One value on the
other hand would be that it was published right after the attack, telling the reader
how much this attack influenced the Americans. Overall this is a biased article,
This was a
propaganda poster,
made for the
Americans to buy
bonds and give the US more money
to put into to
weapons. The cause was that after
the attack, the
United States of America wanted its
population to buy
bonds, so that they would buy more weapons to fight against the axis powers.
The poster used children, because more people felt bad for children then is there
would have been adults. Also most families owned children and the people felt
sorry for all the children growing up without a dad, because he was killed during
the attack on Pearl Harbor. The poster says Remember Pearl Harbor this might
mean that the poster wants the view to donate money, because they all believed
that the attack was unfair. One limitation of the poster, is that once again it is
very one sided and makes it look like Japan were the bad guys, but America also
played a major role in the attack. Another limitation of the poster, is that it looks
like Americans were so sad after the attack and that they were innocent little
children, nevertheless America very quickly got revenge and the Japanese were
never asked how they felt. Overall I think the poster is very biased and very
inaccurate when used in school, nevertheless it is a very good representor of
propaganda and its effect.