Effect of abrasive particle size on abrasive wear

of hardfacing alloys
R. Chotborsk1, P. Hrab1, M. Mller1, J. Savkov2, M. Jirka1,
M. Navrtilov1
1

Department of Material Science and Manufacturing Technology, Faculty of Engineering,

Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2
New Technologies Research Centre in Westbohemian Region NTC,
University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic

Abstract: Hardfacing is one of the most useful and economical ways to improve the performance of components submitted to severe wear conditions. This study has been made for the comparison of microstructure and abrasion resistance
of hardfacing alloys reinforced with chromium carbides or complex carbides. The hardfacing alloys were deposited
onto NS EN S235JR low carbon steel plates by the gas metal arc welding (GMAW) method. Different commercial
hardfacing electrodes were applied to investigate the effect of abrasive particle size on abrasive wear resistance. The
abrasion tests were made using the two-body abrasion test according to SN 01 5084 standard, abrasive cloths were of
grits 80, 120, 240, and 400. Microstructure characterisation and surface analysis were made using optical and scanning
electron microscopy. The results show the different influence of abrasive particles size on the wear rate for different
structures of Fe-Cr-C system. The structures without primary carbides are of high abrasive wear rate, which increases
nonlinearly with the increasing abrasive particle size. On the contrary, the structures containing primary carbides are
of low abrasive rates and theses rates increase linearly with the increasing abrasive particle size.
Keywords: hardfacing alloy; abrasive wear; pin-on-disk; carbide

Wear by hard particles occurs in many different

situations such as with earth-moving equipment,
slurry pumps or pipelines, rock drilling, rock or ore
crushers, pneumatic transport of powders, dies in
power metallurgy, extruders, or chutes. According
to Figure 1, the wear processes may be classified
by different modes depending on the kinematics
and by mechanisms depending on the physical
and chemical interactions between the elements
of the tribosystem which result in detaching the
material from the solid surfaces. Compared with
the unlubricated sliding wear, the value of the wear
coefficient k, i.e. the dimensionless quotient of the
amount of volumetric wear W V times the hardness
of the wearing material H divided by the normal
load F N and the sliding distances, as estimated from
practical experience, can be substantially greater in
abrasive or erosive wear (Zum Gahr 1998). Figure1

can only represent a very rough estimation of the

wear coefficient because of the wide variation of
the wear mechanisms occurring in an actual tribosystem as a function of the operating conditions
and properties of the triboelements involved, which
can result in changes of the k value by some orders
of magnitude.
In abrasive wear, the material is displaced or detached from the solid surface by hard particles or
hard particles between or embedded in one or both
of the two solid surfaces in relative motion, or by the
presence of hard protuberances on the counterface
sliding with the velocity v relatively along the surface.
Two-body abrasion is caused by hard protuberances
or embedded hard particles while in three-body
abrasion the hard particles can move freely (roll or
slide) between the contacting surfaces. According
to Suchnek et al. (2007), the rate of the material

Supported by the Internal Grant Agency of the Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Engineering, Project
No. 31140/1312/313113.
RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

101

Wear mode

WV H
Wear coefficient k =
Fn s

Wear mechanism

107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100

Sliding wear

Abrasive wear

Erosive wear

Figure 1. Values of wear coefficient k as a function of wear mechanism without lubricating media (Zum Gahr 1998)

removal in three-body abrasion can be one order of

magnitude lower than that for two-body abrasion,
because the loose abrasive particles abrade the solid
surfaces between which they are situated only about
10% of the time, while they spend about 90% of the
time rolling. Hard particles striking a solid surface
carried either by a gas or a liquid stream can cause
erosive wear whereby the wear mechanism depends
strongly on the angle of incidence of the impacting
particles. The interaction between hard particles
and the solid surface can be generally accompanied
by the events of adhesion, abrasion, deformation,
heating, surface fatigue, and fracture. Figure 2 shows
schematically some general trends of the wear loss of

materials depending on the properties of the abrasive particles and the wearing materials as well as
the operating conditions. With increasing hardness
of the abrasive particles, the wear loss can increase
by about one to two orders of magnitude from a low
to a high level (Figure 2).
Models for two-body abrasion have been developed to a substantially greater depth than those
for three-body abrasion. Penetration of a sliding
abrasive particle into a metallic surface results in
microploughing or microcutting depending on
the attack angle. Below a critical attack angle, the
metallic material is mainly elastically-plastically
deformed and flows around and beneath the sliding

2O
3)

V)

el

(A

0H

ste

HV

500

ic
am
ce
r
itt
le

Ce

Br

Har
d st
eel

(70

Wear loss

ft
So

0
(20

1 000

Glass Flint

1 500

d
nte
me

id
arb

2 000

Garnet Al2O3

Hardness of abrasive particle

102

es

(W

C
C-

o)

2 500
SiC

Figure 2. Schematic representation of

wear loss by hard particles as a function
of material properties such as hardness
of abrasive particle (Zum Gahr 1998)
RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

Figure 3. Schematic representation of different

interactions between sliding abrasive particles and
the surface of materials
(Zum Gahr 1998)

particle but no material is removed from the surface.

Increasing the attack angle leads to a transition from
microploughing to microcutting, i.e. material flows
up the front face of the abrasive particle and is detached from the wearing surface in the form of a chip
(ZumGahr 1998; Colaco & Vilar 2003a).
Hence, a more general model was developed which
describes abrasive wear by distinguishing four types
of interaction between the abrasive particles and
wearing material (Figure 3), namely microploughing, microcutting, microfatigue, and microcracking.
In the ideal case, microploughing, due to a single
pass of one abrasive particle, does not result in any
detachment of material from the wearing surface. A
prow is formed ahead of the abrading particle and
the material is continuously displaced sideways to
form ridges adjacent to the groove produced. The
volume loss can, however, occur owing to the action

of many abrasive particles or the repeated action of a

single particle. The material may be ploughed aside
repeatedly by passing particles and may break off by
low cycle fatigue, i.e. microfatigue. Pure microcutting results in a volume loss by chips equal to the
volume of the wear grooves. Microcracking occurs
when highly concentrated stresses are imposed by
abrasive particles, particularly on the surface of
brittle materials. In this case, large wear debris is
detached from the wearing surface owing to the
crack formation and propagation. Microploughing and microcutting are the dominant processes
on ductile materials while microcracking becomes
important on brittle materials (zum Gahr 1998;
Sevim&Eryurek 2006; Suchnek et al. 2007).
Composites can offer the answer for achieving
high hardness and sufficient fracture toughness to
avoid brittle fracture. Second phases, e.g. hard ce-

Figure 4. Interaction between sliding hard or soft abrasive particles

and reinforcing phases (Zum Gahr
1998)
RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

103

ramic particles or fibers, can be incorporated into

a softer and more ductile matrix. The abrasive wear
resistance of such composites depends on different
microstructural parameters such as the hardness,
shape, size, volume fraction, and distribution of the
embedded phases, the properties of the matrix and
the interfacial bonding between the second phase
and the matrix. Figure 4 shows different interactions
between abrasive particles and a reinforcing phase.
Hard and soft abrasive particles, i.e. harder or softer
than the reinforcing phase, and also small and large
sizes of the reinforcing phase are distinguished. Hard
abrasive particles can easily dig out small phases and
cut or crack larger ones. Soft abrasive particles are
able to dig out small phases or produce large pits.
The indentation depth of soft abrasive particles is
substantially reduced by hard reinforcing phases if
the mean free path between them is smaller than the
size of the abrasive particles. Large phases deficiently
bonded to the matrix can be pulled out. However,
large phases strongly bonded to the matrix can blunt
or fracture soft abrasive particles (Colaco & Vilar
2003b; Buchely et al. 2005).
Hardfacing made using flame, electric arc, or
plasma, are used in industry. Hardfacing makes a
strong metallurgical point between the deposit and
substrate. Filler materials in the form of coated electrodes, cored electrodes, welding rods and powder
represent a wide assortment of metal and composition materials of various properties. The choice of
filler material and hardfacing technology depends on
the part forms and dimensions, chemical composition of the substrate, mode of stress, wear type, and
total cost for hardfacing. Tribological properties
depend on the filler material chemical composition
and on the hardfacing technology. In the first layer

of the deposit, the mixing of the filler material and

substrate occurs. Therefore, the required properties
are reached mostly in the second layer of multilayers
(Glenc & Kahraman 2003; Yilmaz 2006; Correa et al. 2007a,b).
Hardfacing materials of major volume of carbidic
phase in the deposit are of a very good abrasion
resistance. For usual temperatures, hardfacing
materials on the basis of Fe-Cr-C are used, above
all for their relatively low price. Complex deposit
Fe-Cr-C-M (where M means Nb, W, Ti, Mo and
their combination) are of higher abrasion resistance.
The commercially produced hardfacing materials
are usually of 35.5% carbon content (Atamert
& Bhadeshia 1990; Asensio et al. 2003). By the
use of these electrodes on the low carbon steel as
substrate and one layer deposit, the hypoeutectic or
eutectic structure is reached. In the case of complex
alloyed deposit, the hypoeutectic structure with
primary carbides of MC type (e.g. NbC, WC) occurs. The carbides M7C3 with high Cr contents can
be reached only in the second and next layers (Ping
Lu et al. 2004; Chotborsk 2008; Jankauskas
et al. 2008).

Table 1. Chemical composition of substrate plate (weight %)

Hardness measurement

Mn

Fe

0.074

0.33

0.006

0.0025

balance

Experimental procedure
Materials and welding conditions

Steel according to SN EN S235JR was used as

the substrate. Its composition, determined using
the GDOES method, is presented inTable 1. The
substrate plate used for surfacing was of dimensions
100 25 300 mm.
On this substrate plate, the filler materials were deposited. Their nominal chemical composition is presented in Table 2, welding conditions inTable3.

The bulk hardness of the hardfacing deposits was

measured by the Vickers hardness method, while a

Table 2. Chemical composition of electrodes (weight %)

C

Cr

Nb

Mo

Si

Mn

Fe

Hardfacing 1 (H1)

3.2

29

1.0

balance

Hardfacing 2 (H2)

3.5

35

1.0

balance

Hardfacing 3 (H3)

4.4

23.5

5.5

6.5

2.2

1.5

balance

Hardfacing 4 (H4)

3.8

33

0.5

1.2

balance

Hardfacing 5 (H5)

4.5

17.5

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.5

0.5

balance

Hardfacing 6 (H6)

3.5

22

3.5

0.4

0.4

0.9

balance

104

RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

Table 3. Welding conditions

Electrode diameter (mm)

1.6

Arc voltage (V)

27

Welding current (A)

250

Electrode polarity

positive

Welding speed (cm/min)

13

Preheating

no

Deposition rate (kg/h)

4
3
2

14.3

microhardness tester allowed measuring the hardness of the phases in the microstructure by using a
Vickers indenter with a load of 0.1 kg.
Microstructure analysis

Optical and scanning electron microscopes were

used to analyse the microstructure of the specimens.
Secondary electron imaging allowed morphologic
description of the worn surfaces, while backscattered electron imaging and EDX compositional were
used to describe qualitatively the chemical composition of the phases in the microstructure.

Figure 5. Diagrammatic representation of the pin-on-disk

testing machine: 1 abrasive cloth, 2 specimen, 3 holder,
4 weight, 5 screw, 6 nut with cogs, 7 limit switch,
8 pin, 9 horizontal plate

Abrasive wear

The abrasive wear resistance was tested using

the tester with bonded abrasive according to SN
015084 (1974). For the test, the abrasive cloth of 80,
120, 240, and 400 grits and the load of 2.35 kg were
chosen. The mass lost was determined using the
analytic balance of 0.0001 accuracy. The pin-on-disk
testing machine (Figure 5) consists of a uniformly
rotating disk whereon the abrasive cloth is fixed. The
tested specimen is fixed in the holder and pressed

Table 4. Chemical composition of weld deposit layers (weight %)

C

Cr

Nb

Mo

Si

Mn

Fe

Hardfacing 1 (H1)

2.93

26.31

0.6

0.19

1.06

1.0

balance

Hardfacing 2 (H2)

2.04

30.3

0.1

0.76

0.13

balance

Hardfacing 3 (H3)

4.27

19.1

4.64

4.44

0.75

1.35

1.08

0.21

balance

Hardfacing 4 (H4)

2.28

20.86

0.27

0.1

0.45

0.1

balance

Hardfacing 5 (H5)

3.5

12.42

2.45

0.59

0.31

0.63

0.38

0.55

balance

Hardfacing 6 (H6)

3.7

17.21

2.7

0.5

0.34

0.85

balance

Hardfacing 1 (H1)

3.03

32.27

0.64

0.20

1.07

1.03

balance

Hardfacing 2 (H2)

2.93

31.16

0.18

0.80

0.15

balance

Hardfacing 3 (H3)

4.43

21.51

5.26

4.65

0.95

1.52

1.13

0.24

balance

Hardfacing 4 (H4)

3.03

31.98

0.15

0.64

0.15

balance

Hardfacing 5 (H5)

5.01

16.79

7.74

0.67

0.53

0.81

0.49

0.49

balance

Hardfacing 6 (H6)

3.9

18.65

2.9

0.55

0.33

0.84

balance

Hardfacing 1 (H1)

3.1

33.36

0.66

0.20

1.17

1.07

balance

Hardfacing 2 (H2)

2.94

32.83

0.20

0.88

0.21

balance

Hardfacing 4 (H4)

3.41

32.78

0.42

0.17

0.68

0.17

balance

First layer

Second layer

0.36

Third layer

RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

105

a) H1 first layer
a) H1 first layer
(a) layer
H1 first
a) H1 first
H1
first
layer
firstlayer
layer
a)a)H1
first
layer
a) H1 first
layer

b) H1 second layer
b) H1 second layer
(b) H1
H1 second
b)
second
layer
b)b)
layer
layer
H1
second
layer
H1
second
second
layer
b)H1
H1
layer
second
layer
b) H1 b)
second

c) H1 third layer
(c) H1
third
c) H1 third
layer
c)
thirdlayer
layer
third
layer
c) H1
layer
c) H1 third
layer
c)
H1

third
layer
c) H1 third layer

d) H2 first layer
(d) H2
H2 d)
first
layer
d)
first
layer
d)
H2
firstlayer
layer
H2
first
d)
H2
first
layer
d) H2 first
layer
d)
H2

first
layer
d) H2 first layer

(e) H2 layer
second
layer
e) H2 second
e)
second
layer
e) H2
H2 layer
second
second layer
layer
e) H2 second
e) H2 second
e) H2 layer
second layer
e) H2 second layer

(f
H2 third
layer
f)) H2
third
f)H2
H2
third
thirdlayer
layer
layer
H2
third
layer
f) H2 f)f)third
layer
f) H2 third
f) H2layer
third layer
f) H2 third layer

(g) H3
H3
g)
H3
first
firstlayer
layer
g)
first
layer

g) H3
first layer
g) H3 first
layer
g)6.H3
firstoflayer
Figure
Structures
deposit using the optical microscopy
g) H3
first layer
g) H3 first
layer
g) H3 first layer
against the abrasive cloth by the weight of 2.35 kg.
A screw makes possible the radial feed of the specimen. The limit switch stops the test. During the test
the specimen moves from the outer edge to the centre of the abrasive cloth and a part of the specimen
comes in contact with the unused abrasive cloth.
106

(h) H3 second
h) H3layer
second

layer
h) H3 second layer

H3 second
h) H3 h)second
layer layer
h) H3 second layer
h) H3 layer
second layer
h) H3 second
h) H3 second layer
Results and discussion
Chemical composition and microstructure

Table 4 presents the chemical compositions of the

weld deposit layers. It is evident that the chemical
RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

i) H4 first layer
i)(i)H4
first
layer
i) H4 first
layer
H4
first layer
H4first
i)H4
H4
layer
firstlayer
layer
i)i)H4
layer
i)first
first

j) H4 second layer
j) H4 layer
layer
second layer
j)(j)H4
H4
second
second
H4 second
second
j)
layer
second
j)j) H4
j) H4
H4 layer
second layer
layer

k)(k)H4
third
layer
H4layer
H4
third
thirdlayer
layer
k) H4 k)
third
k)
H4

third
k)
H4
layer

third
layer
k) H4 k)
third
H4layer
third layer

l) H5 first layer
H5
first
first
layer
l) H5
first layer
l)(l)H5
layer
l)
H5

first
l)
H5
layer
first layer
l) H5 first
layer
l) H5
first layer

(m)H5
H5 second
second layer
layer
m)
H5
m)
second
m)
H5
layer
second
layer
m)
H5
m)
second
H5
layer
second
layer
m) H5 second layer
m) H5 second layer

(n) H6 first
layer
n) H6
first layer
n)
H6
first
layer
n) H6
H6
first layer
n)
H6
first
n)
layer

n) H6 first layerfirst layer

n) H6 first layer

(o)H6
H6 second
first layerlayer
o)second
o)
o) H6
H6 o)
second
o)H6
H6layer
layer
second layer
layer
second
Figure o)
6. continued
H6 second layer
o) H6 second layer

composition approximately equal to the filler wire

composition is reached in the second and further
layers. The difference between the second and third
layers is not so much expressive and the layers structures are the same. The lower content of carbon and
alloying elements in the first layer is caused by mixRES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

ing the overlay and low carbon substrate materials.

This problem can be solved e.g. by the use of powder
graphite and alloys added in the course of hardfacing. This method was successfully used e.g. by Wang
et al. 2006, when the powder graphite was added in
the welding flux. E.g. Wang tested the alloying using
107

(a) E4V1, WD10.0 mm, SigSE, Spot 4.5,

a)
Mag1 500 x, 1 000.0 m

(b) E1V1, WD9.8 mm, SigSE, Spot 4.0,

Mag1 500 x, 100.0 b)
m

(c) E4V2, WD10.3 mm, SigSE, Spot 3.5,

c)
Mag5 000 x, 20.0 m

(d) E4V2, WD10.3 mm, SigBSE, Spot 4.5,

Mag1 500 x, 100.0 d)
m

(e) E1V2, WD9.8 mm, SigSE, Spot 4.0,

e)
Mag2 000 x, 50.0 m

(f ) E1V2, WD9.8 mm, SigSE, Spot 4.0,

f)
Mag6 000 x, 20.0 m

Figure 7. Structures of the some deposit using SEM

108

RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

Table 5. Hardness of hardfacing layers (HV30)

Hardfacing 1

Hardfacing 2

Hardfacing 3

Hardfacing 4

Hardfacing 5

Hardfacing 6

First layer

617

492

714

465

612

606

Second layer

680

564

812

560

778

646

Third layer

696

638

595

powder of high carbon ferrochromium mixed with

welding flux for SAW surfacing method. The results
can be found e.g. in works of Wang (Wang et al.
2007, 2008a,b,c).
Figure 6 shows the deposit structures corresponding to the chemical compositions presented
in Table4. The structures of one layer deposits
(H1, H2, H4, H6) are created by carbidic eutectic
and austenite. The morphology of carbidic eutectic
consisting of carbide (Fe, Cr) 7C3 and austenite is
showed in Figure 7a. The deposits without primary
carbides contain this type of carbidic eutectic. The
structures of complex alloyed deposit materials
(H3,H5) are created by carbidic eutectic on the basis
of M7C3, austenite, and primary carbides of MC type
(Figure7b for H5).
The structure of two layers deposit is created by
primary carbides, carbidic eutectic (Figure 7c), and
austenite. The primary carbides of M7C3 (Figure7d)
are in the weld deposits of H1, H2, H4, and H6.
The neighbourhood of these carbides is austenitic.
The second layer of the complex alloyed deposit is
created by primary carbides MC a M7C3, carbidic

eutectic, and austenite (Figure 7e). The eutectic

morphology is shown in Figure 7f.
Hardness

The Vickers hardness (HV) values are presented

in Table 5 for one-layer, two-layer, and three-layer
deposits. The hardness of the deposit corresponds
to the structure. The lowest hardness values were
determined in one-layer deposit materials alloyed
only with chromium. The hardness of these deposits
is influenced by the proportion of phases. The deposit containing the highest amount of austenite is
of the lowest hardness. The hardness increases with
the carbidic eutectic quantity. The complex alloyed
deposits in the second or third layers with primary
carbides contents are of the highest hardness values.
The hardness values of these deposits increase with
the carbidic phase amount and size. Except the deposit bulk hardness, the hardness of single phases
is also determined (if the phase size is sufficient for
HV0.01 measuring). Table 6 shows the hardness of
single microstructure phases of deposits.

Table 6. Hardness of phases in the hardfacing

Phase

austenite (HV0.02)

eutectic (HV0.02)

MC (HV0.1)

M7C3 (HV0.1)

H2 first layer

650

930

H2 second layer

612

950

H2 third layer

965

H3 first layer

700

1 130

1 850

H3 second layer

730

1 150

1 850

1 600

H4 first layer

642

940

H4 second layer

635

1 050

1 550

H4 third layer

640

1 020

1 560

H5 first layer

1 120

1 800

720

1 150

1 800

1 635

H5 second layer
H6 first layer
H6 second layer

873

650

870

1 600

RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

109

Hardfacing 1 (first layer)

Hardfacing 1 (third layer)

4.0
Wear rate (mg/m)

3.5

Figure 8. Hardfacing 1 relation between wear rate and abrasive particles

size

Hardfacing 1 (second layer)

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Mean diameter of abrasive particles (m)

(mm)

Abrasive wear and roughness

Wear rate (mg/m)

Figures 813 show the abrasive wear resistance

results of the hardfacings tested. From the results
it follows that the structure is of a significant influ-

4.0

Hardfacing 2 (first layer)

3.5

Hardfacing 2 (third layer)

ence on the wear resistance. With the hardfacing of

eutectic or hypoeutectic structures, the dependence
between the wear rate and abrasive particles mean
diameter is linear. The wear rate of these hardfacings
depends significantly on the proportions of carbidic

Hardfacing 2 (second layer)

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Mean diameter of abrasive particles (m)

(mm)
2.0

Hardfacing 3 (first layer)

1.8

Figure 9. Hardfacing 2 relation between wear rate and

abrasive particles size

Hardfacing 3 (second layer)

Wear rate (mg/m)

1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0

50

100

150

200

Mean diameter of abrasive particles (m)

(mm)

110

250

300

Figure 10. Hardfacing 3 relation between wear rate and

abrasive particles size

RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

Hardfacing 4 (first layer)

4.0

Hardfacing 4 (third layer)

3.5
Wear rate (mg/m)

Figure 11. Hardfacing 4 relation between wear rate and

abrasive particles size

Hardfacing 4 (second layer)

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0

50

100

150

200

250

300

(m)
Mean diameter of abrasive particles (mm)

eutectic and austenite. The higher the carbidic eutectic content in the hardfacing structure, the lower
the wear rate.
With the occurrence of primary carbides in the
structure, the wear rate increases linearly with the
2.0

Hardfacing 5 (first layer)

abrasive particle size. The wear rate decreases with

the carbidic phase amount. In the first layer, the
hardfacing 3 contains a higher quantity of primary
carbides MC than the hardfacing 5 and the carbidic
eutectic and austenite matrix shows a higher repre-

Hardfacing 5 (second layer)

1.8
Wear rate (mg/m)

1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Mean diameter of abrasive particles (m)

(mm)
Hardfacing 6 (first layer)

3.0

Figure 12. Hardfacing 5 relation between wear rate and

abrasive particles size

Hardfacing 6 (second layer)

Wear rate (mg/m)

2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5

Wear rate (mg/m)

0.0

3.0
02.5
2.0

Hardfacing 6 (first layer)

50

100

0.5

150

200

(m)
Mean diameter of abrasive particles (mm)

1.5
RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113
1.0

Hardfacing 6 (second layer)

250

300

Figure 13. Hardfacing 6 relation between wear rate and

abrasive particles size

111

sentation of austenite. The works of Suchnek present that this austenite, if deformed, transforms into
martensite. In the second layer of hardfacings 3 and5,
the carbides MC and M7C3 occur. The quantities of
M7C3 and its sizes is almost identical and therefore the
wear rate is of the same value. A slightly lower wear
rate is found in the hardfacing 3, evidently because
of the higher content of MC phase.
E.g. in the first layer of hardfacings 4 and 6 no
primary carbides occur and the structure consists
of carbidic eutectic and austenite. In the third layer
of hardfacing 4 and in the second layer of hardfacing 6 primary carbides M7C3 already occur and the
wear rate decreases significantly. The character of
the wear rate dependence on the abrasive particles
size changes to linear.
Conclusion

The knowledge obtained can be summarised in

the ollowing points:
The hardness of hypoeutectic hardfacings increases with the carbidic eutectic part and type.
The hardness of hypereutectic hardfacing increases
with the increasing proportions of carbidic phases
MC and M7C3.
The abrasive wear rate of hypoeutectic hardfacing
depends on the structural components portions. A
higher part of alloyed eutectic reduces the wear rate.
The dependence of hypoeutectic deposit abrasive
wear rate on the abrasive particles size is not linear.
This fact can be caused by the abrasive particle critical size, which erodes the carbidic eutectic softer
phase and in this way uncovers the carbidic phase
which can crumble away. This dependence of the
abrasive wear rate increase on the increase of the
abrasive particle size is almost constant.
The abrasive wear rate of hypereutectic hardfacing
decreases with the increasing proportions of carbidic
phases MC and M7C3. In this decrease, the MC phase
participates more because it is harder. This is shown
in comparing the hardfacings 3, 4, 5, and 6.
The dependence between the hypereutectic hardfacings wear rate and the abrasive particle size is linear.
References
Asensio J., Pero-Sanz J.A., Verdeja J. I. (2003): Microstructure selection criteria for cast irons with more than
10 wt.% chromium for wear applications. Materials Characterization, 49: 8393.
Atamert S., Bhadeshia H.k.d.h. (1990): Microstructure
and stability of Fe-Cr-C hardfacing alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A, 130: 101111.

112

Buchely M.f., Gutierrez J.c., Len L.m., Toro A. (2005):

The effect of microstructure on abrasive wear of hardfacing
alloys. Wear, 259: 5261.
Chotborsk R., Hrab P., Mller M., Savkov J., Jirka
M. (2008): Abrasive wear of high chromium Fe-Cr-C
hardfacing alloys. Research Agriculture Engineering, 54:
192198.
Colaco R., Vilar R.a. (2003a): Model for the abrasive wear
of metallic matrix particle-reinforced materials. Wear,
254: 625634.
Colaco R., Vilar R.a. (2003b): Abrasive wear of metallix
matrix reinforced materials. Wear, 255: 643650.
Correa E.o., Alcantara N.g., Tecco D.g.,.kumar R.V
(2007a): Development of an iron-based hardfacing material
reinforced with Fe-(TiW)C composite powder. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 38: 937945.
Correa E.o., Alcntara, N.g., Tecco, D.g., Kumar, R.V.
(2007b): The relationship between the microstructure and
abrasive resistance of a hardfacing alloy in the Fe-Cr-CNb-V system. Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A,
38: 16711680.
Glenc B., Kahraman N. (2003): Wear behaviour of
bulldozer rollers welded using a submerged arc welding
process. Materials and Design, 24: 537542.
Jankauskas V., Kreivaitis R., Milius D., Baltunikas A.
(2008): Analysis of abrasive wear performance of arc welded
hard layers. Wear, doi:10.1016/j.wear.2008.03.022.
Ping Lu Shan, Oh-yang Kwon, Tae-bum Kim, Kwon-hu
Kim (2004): Microstructure and wear property of Fe-MnCr-Mo-V alloy cladding by submerged arc welding. Journal
of Material Processing Technology, 147: 191196.
Sevim I., Eryurek B.I. (2006): Effect of abrasive particle
size on wear resistance in steels. Materials and Design,
27: 173181.
Suchnek J., Kuklk V., Zdraveck E. (2007): Abrasive
wear of materials. CTU Prague, Praha, 162. (in Czech)
Wang X.h., Song S.l., Zou Z.d., Qu S.Y. (2006): Fabricating TiC particles reinforced Fe-based composite coatings
produced by GTAW multi-layers melting process. Materials Science and Engineering A, 441: 6067.
Wang X.h., Song S.l., Qu S.y., Zou Z.D. (2007): Characterization of in situ synthesized TiC particle reinforced
Fe-based composite coatings produced by multi-pass
overlapping GTAW melting process. Surface and Coatings
Technology, 201: 58995905.
Wang X.h., Han F., Qu S.y., Zou Z.D. (2008a): Microstructure of the Fe-based hardfacing layers reinforced by
TiC-VC-Mo2C particles. Surface and Coatings Technology,
202: 15021509.
Wang X.h., Han F., Liu X.m., Qu S.y., Zou Z.D. (2008b):
Microstructure and wear properties of the Fe-Ti-V-Mo-C
hardfacing alloy. Wear, 256: 583589.
Wang X.h., Han F., Liu X.m., Qu S.y., Zou Z.D. (2008c):
Effect of molybdenum on the microstructure and wear

RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

resistance of Fe-based hardfacing coatings. Materials Science and Engineering A, 489: 193200.
Yilmaz S.O. (2006): Wear behavior of gas tungsten arc deposited FeCr, FeCrC, and WC coatings on AISI 1018 steel.
Surface and Coatings Technology, 201: 15681575.

Zum Gahr K.H. (1998): Wear by hard particles. Tribology

International, 31: 587596.
Received for publication October 10, 2008
Accepted after corrections May 6, 2009

Abstrakt
Chotborsk R., Hrab P., Mller M., Savkov J., Jirka M., Navrtilov M. (2008): Vliv velikosti abrazivn stice na abrazivn opoteben nvarovch materil. Res. Agr. Eng., 55: 101113.
Nvarov vrstvy jsou jednou z cest ke zven odolnosti proti opoteben a zrove jsou i ekonomickou cestou. Studie
porovnv mikrostrukturn charakteristiky nvarovch materil a odolnost vi abrazivnmu opoteben. Studium
bylo provdno na nvarovch materilech, kde ve struktue byly chromov karbidy a karbidy komplexn. Nvarov
materil byl nanesen na nzkouhlkovou ocel S235JR metodou odtavujc se elektrody v ochrann atmosfe. Rzn
komern nvarov materily byly studovny z hlediska efektu velikosti abrazivn stice na abrazivn opoteben.
Test abrazivnho opoteben byl provdn na brusnm pltn o zrnitosti 80, 120, 240 a 400 podle SN 01 5084. Charakteristika mikrostruktury a analza povrchu byla provdna postupy optick a elektronov mikroskopie. Vsledky
ukazuj rozdln vliv velikosti abrazivn stice na rychlost opoteben pro rzn struktury systmu Fe-Cr-C. Struktury bez primrnch karbid maj vysokou rychlost abrazivnho opoteben; tato rychlost roste nelinern se zvtujc
se velikost abrazivn stice. Naopak struktury sprimrnmi karbidy maj nzkou rychlost abrazvnho opoteben
atato rychlost roste linern se zvtujc se abrazivn stic.
Klov slova: nvarov materil; abrazivn opoteben; pin-on-disk; karbidy

Corresponding author:

Ing. Rostislav Chotborsk, Ph.D., esk zemdlsk univerzita vPraze, Technick fakulta,
katedra materilu a strojrensk technologie, Kamck 129, 165 21 Praha 6-Suchdol, esk Republika
tel.: + 420224383274, fax: + 420234381828, e-mail: [email protected]

RES. AGR. ENG., 55, 2009 (3): 101113

113