Wear Introduction of Wear
Wear Introduction of Wear
Wear Introduction of Wear
Introduction of Wear:
Undesirable removal of material from operating solid surface is
known as wear.
There are two definitions :
(1)Zero wear : Removal of material which causes polishing of material
surfaces may be known as "Zero wear". It may increase
performance. It is for betterment, so it is not undesirable.
Zero wear is basically a polishing process in which the asperities of the
contacting surfaces are gradually worn off until a very fine, smooth
surface develops. Generally, “polishing-in” wear is desirable for better
life of tribo-pair.
Fig. shows polished surface of helical gear which occurs due to slow
loss of metal that will have a little effect on the satisfactory
performance within the life of the gears.
(2) Measurable wear : Removal of material from surface that
increases vibration; noise or surface roughness may be treated an
"Measureable wear". Often we measure wear in volume/mass
reduction. Undesirable removal of material occurs in measurable
wear.
Measurable wear refers to a loss of material which must be counted
to estimate the life of tribo-pair. The extent of measurable wear
depends on the lubrication regime, the nature of the load, the
surface hardness and roughness, and on the contaminants in the
lubricating oil. A typical example of measurable wear in helical gear
is shown in Fig. which is typically known as pitting wear.
Pitting is a surface fatigue failure which occurs due to repeated
loading of tooth surface and the contact stress exceeding the surface
fatigue strength of the material. Material in the fatigue region gets
removed and a pit is formed. The pit itself will cause stress
concentration and soon the pitting spreads to adjacent region till the
whole surface is covered with pits. Subsequently, higher impact load
resulting from pitting may cause fracture of already weakened tooth.
Sometimes impurities in materials provide nucleus for crack
generation as shown in Fig.(c). Fig.(d) shows merger of generated
cracks, which finally detaches from the surface as shown in Fig.(e).
Such formation of pits (removal of material) comes under
measurable wear.
Many time the change in surface profile alters the optimum value of
clearance and reduces load capacity of machine components.
Fig. shows worn out rollers. Sliding to rolling ratio for these worn out
rollers increase with wear rate and usage of rolling element bearing
loses its purpose.
Fig. shows variation in bearing clearance due to abrasion of the
bearing surface. With increase in bearing clearance load capacity of
bearing decreases as shown in Fig.
X-axis of Fig. represents radial clearance which is given by 0.1% of
radius multiplied with the factor depicting increase in clearance due
to wear.
Removal of material from operating solid surfaces by solid particles
depends upon Load, Velocity, Environment, and Materials. Removal
of material from operating solid surface by Fluid (liquid/gas)
depends upon Velocity, pressure, Environment and material.
As wear increases power losses increases, oil consumption
increases, rate of component replacement also inreases. Ultimately,
it reduces efficiency of the system. Therefore, as far as possible
wear should be minimized.
Wear Mechanisms :
Wear can be classified based on the ways that the frictional junctions
are broken, that is, elastic displacement, plastic displacement,
cutting, destruction of surface films and destruction of bulk material.
There are many types of wear mechanisms, but we shall discuss
about common wear mechanisms, which are:
• Abrasive Wear : polishing, scouring, scratching, grinding, gouging.
• Adhesive Wear : galling, scuffing, scoring.
• Cavitation (interaction with fluid).
• Corrosive Wear (Chemical nature).
• Erosive Wear.
• Fatigue : delamination.
• Fretting Wear.
Adhesive Wear
Adhesive wear is very common in metals.
It is dependent on the mutual affinity between the materials.
Let us take example of steel and indium [Fig.(a)]. When steel pin under
load is pushed [Fig.(b)] in indium block, and subsequently retracted [Fig.
(c)], a thin layer of indium transferred on the steel pin. Similar behavior is
observed by pushing brass metal in indium metal. This behavior
demonstrates the loss of indium material, which occurs due to high value
of adhesive force between steel and indium. If steel pin is subjected to
normal load as well as tangential load [Fig.(d)] then severe wear of indium
material occurs. By introducing a thin layer of lubricant at the interface of
indium and metal, the severe wear can be reduced to mild wear. Shear
strength of lubricant layer is much smaller than shear strength of indium
metal, therefore weak interface between steel and indium occurs which
can be sheared easily and wear rate reduces to mild value.
All theories which predict wear rates start from the concept of true
area of contact.
It is usually assumed that the true area of contact between two real
metal surfaces is determined by the plastic deformation of their
highest asperities.
Severity of adhesive wear is based on the area of contact which is
given by A = W/H. Here, W is load applied to press one surface over
other surface and H is hardness of soft material.
This expression provides appropriate results if whole load is
supported due to plastic deformation of the surface.
However, for elasto-plastic deformation, the expression needs to be
slightly modified. (A = (W/H)n where (2/3 < n < 1).
Here assumption is that higher asperities could be deformed
plastically, while the lower contacting asperities are subject to within
elastic limits.
In addition, the adhesive wear will depend on the shear strength of
friction junctions.
This means total true area of contact consists of plastic and elastic
asperity contacts and shear strength of the contacting asperities vary in
shear strength and thus influence the rate of adhesive wear.
If the junction is weaker than the material on either side of it, shearing
occurs at the interface itself Fig.(a). There will be little surface damage
and little wear. This situation occurs if sliding occurs within the surface
oxide layer.
If the junction is stronger than one of the metals, shearing will not occur
at the interface but at a little distance within the softer metal [Fig.(b)
and Fig.(c)].
This may lead to an enormous increase in wear rate.
Scoring wear, a severe form of adhesive wear, occurs due to tearing
out of small particles that weld together as a result of overheating
(due to high contact pressure and/or high sliding velocity) of the
tooth mesh zone, permitting metal to metal contact shown in Fig. (d).
After welding, sliding forces tear the metal from the surface
producing a minute cavity in one surface and a projection on the
other. The wear initiates microscopically, however, it progresses
rapidly.
Scoring is sometimes referred to as galling, seizing or scuffing.
Steps leading to Adhesive Wear :
Steps leading to Adhesive Wear :
It is well known that macroscopically smooth surfaces are rough on
micro scale as shown in Fig.(a) and Fig.(b).
When two such surfaces are brought together as shown in Fig.(c),
contact is made at relatively few isolated asperities.
As a normal load is applied, the local pressure at the asperities
becomes extremely high. In the absence of surface films the surfaces
would adhere but a small amount of contaminant prevents adhesion
under purely normal loading.
However, relative tangential motion at the interface disperses the
contaminant films at the points of contact, and welding of the
junctions can take place. Continued sliding causes the junctions to be
sheared and new junctions to be formed. The amount of wear
depends on the position at which the junction is sheared as shown in
Fig.(a) to (c).
If shearing occurs at the interface then wear is negligible. If shear
takes place away from the interface then metal is transferred from
one surface to the other. With further rubbing, some of the
transferred material is detached to form loose wear particles. We
can summarize these steps as :
• Deformation of contacting asperities Fig. (a).
• Removal (abrasion) of protective oxide surface film.
• Formation of adhesive junctions Fig. (b).
• Failure of junction by pulling out large lumps and transfer of
materials Fig. (c).
Laws of Adhesive Wear :
• Wear Volume proportional to sliding distance of travel (L)
- True for wide range of conditions except where back
transfer occurs.
• Wear Volume proportional to the load (W)
- Dramatic increase beyond critical load as shown in Fig.
• Wear volume inversely proportional to hardness(H) of
softer material