Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 537 views

    Projet Tu Etais Comment Rubric 2015

    Uploaded by

    api-281389099
    The document provides a rubric to evaluate content, comprehensibility, organization/presentation, grammar/syntax/usage, and effort for a writing assignment. The rubric includes ratings from 1-4, with 4 being the highest, to assess performance in each category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Projet Tu Etais Comment Rubric 2015

    Uploaded by

    api-281389099
    537 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric to evaluate content, comprehensibility, organization/presentation, grammar/syntax/usage, and effort for a writing assignment. The rubric includes ratings from 1-4, with 4 being the highest, to assess performance in each category.

    Original Title

    projet tu etais comment rubric 2015

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric to evaluate content, comprehensibility, organization/presentation, grammar/syntax/usage, and effort for a writing assignment. The rubric includes ratings from 1-4, with 4 being the highest, to assess performance in each category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    537 views1 page

    Projet Tu Etais Comment Rubric 2015

    Uploaded by

    api-281389099
    The document provides a rubric to evaluate content, comprehensibility, organization/presentation, grammar/syntax/usage, and effort for a writing assignment. The rubric includes ratings from 1-4, with 4 being the highest, to assess performance in each category.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Imparfait: Tu tais comment?

    CONTENT

    COMPREHENSIBILITY

    ORGANIZATION /
    PRESENTATION

    GRAMMAR/
    SYNTAX/USAGE

    Complete

    Generally Complete

    Somewhat Complete

    Incomplete

    The writer clearly conveys the


    main idea with details that are
    relevant and interesting. There
    are 15 or more sentences
    answering the questions provided
    in detail.
    Comprehensible
    Writer uses appropriate language
    to convey the main idea of this
    item clearly, in writing and in
    speaking.

    The writer conveys the main


    idea, but does not support it with
    adequate relevant details. There
    are about 15 sentences
    answering the questions
    provided.
    Mostly comprehensible
    Message is unclear in places.
    The language used is inadequate
    to make the message totally
    clear, in writing and in speaking.

    The main idea is unclear. Much of the


    detail is irrelevant. There are less than
    15 sentences and / or some of the
    questions provided remain unanswered.

    The main idea is unclear. Details are


    nonexistent or random and irrelevant.
    There are far less than 15 sentences
    and/or the questions provided are
    unanswered.

    Somewhat comprehensible
    The message could only be understood
    by a sympathetic native reader/listener.
    The language used is often inappropriate
    or distorted by interference from
    English, in writing and in speaking.

    Incomprehensible
    Writer does not make him/herself
    understood in writing or in speaking.

    Well-organized

    Generally well-organized

    Somewhat fluent

    Not fluent

    Well organized, presented in


    appropriate format. Logical and
    effective order. Each sentence is
    presented with an image
    meaningful to the statement. Oral
    presentation is clear, organized.

    Generally well organized with a


    few minor problems. Most
    sentences are presented with an
    image meaningful to the
    statement. Oral presentation is
    mostly clear.

    Poorly organized. Order is illogical and


    confusing in places. The presentation of
    this item detracts from the main idea.
    The image used does not help convey
    the meaning of the sentence. Oral
    presentation somewhat unclear.

    Presentation is inappropriate. The


    lack of organization distorts or
    completely obscures the main idea.
    The image used does not convey the
    main idea of the entry. Unsuccessful
    oral presentation.

    Accurate

    Communication w/minor
    problems
    Any mistakes in usage are
    minor and do not distort
    meaning. Spelling,
    capitalization, and punctuation
    mistakes are infrequent.

    Communication somewhat inhibited

    Communication completely
    inhibited
    Problems in usage completely distort
    meaning and inhibit
    communications. Mistakes in
    spelling, capitalization, and
    punctuation make the item
    incomprehensible.
    Does not meet minimum
    requirements

    Functions, grammar and


    vocabulary are used correctly.
    Spelling, capitalization and
    punctuation are generally correct.

    EFFORT

    Exceeds requirements

    Fulfills minimum
    requirements

    Exceeds the minimum


    requirements of the assignment
    and provides evidence of
    thoughtful input.

    Fulfills the minimum


    requirements of the assignment
    and provides evidence of
    thoughtful input

    Problems in usage significantly distort


    meaning and inhibit communication in
    some instances. Frequent mistakes in
    spelling, capitalization, and punctuation
    disrupt the flow.
    Minimum requirements but no
    thoughtful input
    Fulfills the minimum requirements of
    the assignment but does not show
    evidence of thoughtful input

    Does not fulfill the minimum


    requirements of the assignment or
    provide evidence of thoughtful input

    You might also like