Heather's Reviews > The Maze Runner

The Maze Runner by James Dashner
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2098381
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: 2010

At first I was a bit put out with this book. I don’t know what it is about male authors, but they can be down right infuriating. Men truly do think on a different wave length and speak another language than women. I was becoming rather frustrated with the lack of information being given, and I wasn’t sure I would be able to endure that sort of aggravation for 300 plus pages. Luckily around page 60 or so, Dashner hit his stride and I became enthralled with this story.

It’s so difficult to write a review that divulges information about the plot without simultaneously giving the plot away. Dashner mastered the art of dolling out need to know information in spades while maintaining an air of mystery that keeps you immersed in the story, craving for more.

The Maze Runner begins with Thomas finding himself memory-less, surrounded by teenage boys of varying ages, in a strange place called the Glade. Thomas immediately begins asking questions, attempting to get his bearings, though answers aren’t forth coming, and the Gladers are none to helpful. Nonetheless, life doesn’t seem too shabby in the Glade. There is a homestead, crops, barns filled with livestock, the sun always shines, and various supplies appear in “the box” each week upon request. There even appears to be order within the Glade, though it is filled with nothing but testosterone fueled teenage boys. There appears to be only a handful of rules, 1. Never threaten your fellow Gladers, 2. Everyone must pull their weight, 3. No one is allowed in the Maze aside from runners, 4. No one is allowed in the Maze after dark. Though the rules are rather self-explanatory, their necessity becomes all to clear once Thomas is allowed to know what lurks behind the stone walls protecting the Glade. While no one knows how they came to arrive in the Glade, why they were sent, or who sent them, they all strive towards a common goal, solving the Maze and leaving the Glade. But once the first ever girl arrives into the Glade, a trigger is pulled, and the stakes for survival are raised.

Despite the fact that I didn’t have an emotional reaction (crying when it was clear that I was meant to), I couldn’t set this book down. I wasn’t scared for any of the characters, my heart didn’t race, but I desperately wanted to solve the freakin mystery. Luckily, there is a conclusion of sorts; however, this is clearly a series as you gain new information that tickles your intrigue before coming to a major halt. Grr. So like all the other suckers, I’m sure I’ll be reading the sequel.
162 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Maze Runner.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 12, 2009 – Shelved
February 11, 2010 – Started Reading
February 21, 2010 – Finished Reading
February 22, 2010 – Shelved as: 2010

Comments Showing 1-50 of 62 (62 new)


message 1: by Anna (new)

Anna Does this book contain any romance?


Heather Not that I can tell thus far. It's sort of leading up to a romance between two of the characters but seeing as this book is mainly a thriller, and written by a man, I wouldn't set my expectations too high on the love front.


message 3: by Michelle (new) - added it

Michelle Thank you for saying that it picks up around page 60 - I was just about ready to ditch it - now I'll keep going. The book Outlander was the same way and it ended up being one of my favorite books of all time.


Corey i agree! i was mad at first! but I was hooked because it would haunt me if i didnt figure the mystery out.


Emily I love your review! Not just because I felt exactly the same (I kept having to remind myself it was writen by a man for boys! The ending!!! If I didnt have the sequel on the sofa next to me I might have thrown the book! lol). But I like your synop. Its not a past of the cover synop (hate that) but gives me an outline without giving anything important away. Very important to me when desiding if its "to read" worthy. And you say Grr! lol Thanks again! I look forward to checking out your other reviews! ^_^


Emily *paste


Sandra I felt the same, I liked it but no emotional connection whatsoever.


Sara Felt the exact same way as well. It does make me wonder if boys/men have stronger emotional reactions where it seems we're supposed to have them. I'm also glad I have the second book right here because I too would have thrown this one to the ground otherwise. Awesome review.


message 9: by Steven (new) - added it

Steven I haven't read this yet, but being a guy i can say we probably do react differently. like I though several parts in the hunger games were unnecessarily sappy. the cave comes to mind and the overkill concern of a dude who didn't make a move's feelings. I'm sorry, but people don't "?really" behave that way in the real world. You don't make a move you get friend zoned. In the same sense by the third book I hated Katniss. If the girls on here felt differently I'd say we operate on different wavelengths. :)


message 10: by [deleted user] (new)

I've had such a hard time trying to get into this book that I was about to give up but I think I'll try and stay around until page 60 now!


Brittani Allen OMG I felt alexactly like you did but it took me half the book to get into it...


Amelia Louise Price oh subtle sexism how I do loathe the.


Tyler Dean That was a pretty sexist comment, Heather. Not a fan. Not a fan at all.


message 14: by Steven (last edited Jul 08, 2012 01:08PM) (new) - added it

Steven Notebook, Big Fish, The princess bride and Great Gatsby all written by men so I'd say men are more than capable. I wouldn't draw conclusions based on those grounds. What about all the women authors who write these bizarre triangle relationships, should I presume that all women authors do this? No, I shouldn't because that'd be ridiculous.

That being said almost all romance/relationships or sex I've ever read in a book is just unrealistic so perhaps this one sets a more real tone that some don't like (or doesn't, on my list haven't read yet).


message 15: by Filippa (new)

Filippa Men can't write romance? Shakespeare, anyone?


message 16: by Luke (new) - rated it 5 stars

Luke Jordan Hey now, I liked the book and subtle romance!


message 17: by Heather (last edited Aug 10, 2012 11:05AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Heather In response to messages 13 and beyond, I never stated in my review that men couldn't write romance, in fact I don’t think I mentioned romance, I merely stated that I notice a difference in the styles of books written by men vs. those written by women which is a comment that I will stand by. While I do often find books written by men frustrating, I don’t think those books are poorly written, they are just not written in a way that strikes a chord for me. I imagine men feel much the same way about books written by women. The genders think differently. I never said that women were better for thinking and/or writing differently, nor did I say that male authors write poorly, just that there is, in my opinion, a noticeable difference between the two styles. I don't see how it is sexist to comment on a difference. It is only sexist if I say one is better than the other which I did not. I also gave this book a fairly good rating/reivew, and if any of you had looked at my shelves, you will see that I am more apt to strongly dislike books written by women.

If you can form a rational case for why you think my review is sexist, I'll be happy to discuss, but if you are just trolling to pick a fight, please do so elsewhere.


message 18: by Max (new)

Max I completely agree in most cases, take Christopher Paolini for example, he does not describe his settings at all in the first two books. However then there's writers like George Martin and tolkein who describe in detail everything that happens from what a character looks like to the food they eat (he's a bit obsessed with the food part though)


message 19: by Heather (last edited Aug 10, 2012 10:57AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Heather Amelia, save yourself some time. You are attempting to pick a fight and I will delete your comment every time. Stop it.


message 20: by Heather (last edited Aug 10, 2012 10:56AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Heather Max wrote: "I completely agree in most cases, take Christopher Paolini for example, he does not describe his settings at all in the first two books. However then there's writers like George Martin and tolkein ..."

I completely agree. Love both Martin and Tolkein.


Christiana I find I haven't gotten too far in the book but I am seeing the same as I read, wasn't sure what to think, so much is being withheld but with the arrival of the girl I can see this goon somewhere soon:)


Amelia Louise Price tut. tut. tut.

Oh Heather dear, you are ever so funny.


Amy Vanderburg I've been struggling through this book for three days. good thing you said it gets better I'm only on page 31 it kills me to be.this.bored with a book


message 24: by Jon (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jon I don't think its male authors, just this one. I agree that the beginning of the book is outright frustrating. Poor writing, in my opinion. However, this is a problem I've run into with many authors. I'll have to go back and check if those authors were all men.


Ryker I disagree with heather. for me I found everything well described and the thrill of finding the Answer was really fun. I did find the sequals a little bit lacking in interesting content, much how I felt about tolkeins books, I feel that it describes waaay too much and distracts you from a story. PS people that say things are sexist have to much time on their hands


message 26: by Alison (new) - added it

Alison Powell You are so right when you say that boys speak a whole other language!!!


message 27: by Scar (new)

Scar think men can't write romance or emotionally? Read any book by John Green and try to say that :P but I'm at page 94 and can see where y'all coming from.


message 28: by Amy (new) - rated it 4 stars

Amy B Whilst this review isn't sexist per se, it is rather presumptuous to say that men lack a certain quality that you like in writing, even if you are not saying one is better than the other. For example, if someone wrote a comment saying women writers were infuriating because they cannot control their emotions and therefore write in a style that is too emotional I think some women would be offended. Presuming that the genders are so inherently different (speak another language) is actually perpetuating a norm of thinking that separates the two genders according to certain characteristics. For example, some people might say men are emotionally stronger than women, or more rational (without saying one is better), and this kind of thinking provides a lot of barriers for women to enter certain professions and so on. In reverse, these kind of assumptions about what certain genders are 'like' are the sources of certain laws that give women more maternity rights than man get for paternity rights. So my point is whilst you are not trying to be offensive, making such presumptions about gender can actually be the source of a lot of discrimination. Could you not just have said you get infuriated with authors that lack in detail (as I am sure there are some women that lack in detail too)? This is not meant to be an attack, I just hope people are aware of what they are actually saying.


message 29: by Steven (new) - added it

Steven Well said.


Miranda Nice job, I do hope the second book is like the first though, im getting very annoyed


Billion Star Warrior I don’t know what it is about male authors, but they can be down right infuriating... << that would be it. Do i get a cookie?? LOL. ; )


message 32: by Jamie (new) - added it

Jamie McMullin I don't think men and women think as differently as we generally believe. Gender roles and culture have an undeniable impact on the identity and mind of men/women.


message 33: by Rhea (new) - rated it 5 stars

Rhea I wish male authors could be more like Joss Whedon. He is one of the only authors of his gender to input such strong and convicting female characters in his books and movies.


message 34: by Chad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Chad Though you were more forgiving than I, I like this review. Well stated. Did you read the next two and does it-the story- get any better? I don't want a hunger games repeat, ie-loved the first book, tolerated the second, and hated it all when I finished the third. Please advise!!?!!


message 35: by Krithik (new) - added it

Krithik Roshan male authors?? there are tons of good ones, rick riordan, dan brown, joss whedon, j.r.r tolkien, james patterson, roald dal, C.S. lewis, etc, i could go on listing. male and female, both are equally good at writing, in all genres, it just depends on the particular author. this book was coincidentally bad and written by a man, but that does not mean male authors are bad. both are good, talk stephenie meyer for example, most of the people hate her, is it because she is female, NO, its because her writing style is lame and bland.


message 36: by Navneet (new)

Navneet I think he purposely withheld info from us, I could feel Thomas's frustration at not having any answers. It really put me into the book.


message 37: by Oliver (new)

Oliver Hassani I can believe the over generalized statements about male authors on here... I'm sorry, but the most detailed and fleshed out stories ever written were written by men.. I know this is a YA book so i cant expect you people to have read Tolstoy or Dumas or any of the other male authors who create massive worlds full of everything you can imagine... Rhea's comment is just idiotic... apparently, you people need to read more...


message 38: by Oliver (new)

Oliver Hassani I can't* believe


message 39: by Navneet (new)

Navneet Oliver, a prime example of your statement is LOTR, which is so detailed it gets annoying.


message 40: by Oliver (new)

Oliver Hassani I know, in LOTR Eowyn kills the witch king of angmar... How much stronger must a female character get?


Brittani Riddle I teared up at the every end at one part, but didn't really cry. It took a while for the ball to get rolling, but when it did I was hooked.


message 42: by Navneet (new)

Navneet Ok, for all the people asking this question

The scorch trials is ok, in my opinion the weakest of the three, but still keeps you reading.

The death cure is really good, with a satisfying conclusion.


Heather Oliver wrote: "I know, in LOTR Eowyn kills the witch king of angmar... How much stronger must a female character get?"

You may want to check folks "read" shelves before assuming no one has read a book you find worthy. As someone who has read Tolkien, Shakespeare, Dumas, etc. I will stand by my statement. I didn't say male author's could not write, I said that they were often unable to portray characters in a way that would make them more relatable to their female readers. That's not an insult to their writing. I'm sure many men would say the same about female authors. And at the end of the day, that is just my opinion. Some folks may share it, others will utterly disagree. To each their own as they say.


message 44: by Oliver (new)

Oliver Hassani Heather wrote: "Oliver wrote: "I know, in LOTR Eowyn kills the witch king of angmar... How much stronger must a female character get?"

You may want to check folks "read" shelves before assuming no one has read a ..."


The hell? a book i find worthy? I was giving you examples of Male authors who create great female characters. Plus, Why would i sift through your books when my statement simply said i can't expect people who have read this book to have read actual good books? Anyway, i took your advice and lo and behold, no Dumas in your read books... but then again i didnt look very well.


Abigail Oliver, Tolkien may have written strong characteristics for his female characters, but the characters themselves are not memorable (I've only read the trilogy once and reread the hobbit a bunch of times, but I don't recall there being a real hero that is female). And most people, myself included, don't bother rating classic authors like Dumas in GoodReads.


message 46: by Oliver (new)

Oliver Hassani Abigail wrote: "Oliver, Tolkien may have written strong charteretics for his female characters, but the characters themselves are not memorable (I've only read the trilogy once and reread the hobbit a bunch of tim..."

not memorable? you do realize the subjectivity of such a term? My memory is pretty good, so i remember Eowyn, Galadriel, and Arwen... Also, you are the first person I've seen that doesn't rate classic authors. 442,072 ratings for The Count of Monte Cristo... I'm just gonna assume you talk and think separately :D

Heather, I am sorry for attacking people on your review. I will stop. Plus, i'm a Heather fan after your reviews of The hunger games series! :p


Abigail If you want to get all scholarly about this, check out http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/A... which concurs that the women portrayed in LOTR play minor roles and are predominantly acted upon. Of course "memrobility" is a subjective term- mostly what I found memorable was how insignificant the women were to the spirit of adventure and friendship that defines this book (for me).
I conceed that there are people who have rated The Count of Monte Cristo, but the reviewers I follow generally don't, despite being well-read individuals (it also seems silly to me to rate something like The Maze Runner 4 stars and then also give 4 to a Dumas, because, say you felt the plot moved slowly or whatever- they're in different universes).


Gregory Jensen I've found that I end up enjoying the characters that female authors write a little more then male authors, but that doesn't mean that the books are better.


message 49: by Heather (last edited Oct 08, 2014 12:38PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Heather Oliver it is your opinion that JRR Tolkien create great female characters and your statement above "Why would i sift through your books when my statement simply said i can't expect people who have read this book to have read actual good books?" is also an opinion. An arrogant opinion, but one you are certainly entitled too.



I love Tolkien, but would have to say that the women in the Tolkien universe are placed to assist the men. Notice that the fellowship of 9 were all men. And Arwen gave up her rule of the elves to be the wife of Aragon. Eowyn, who wanted to be a warrior, was denied the role because she was a woman and was only able to fight because she disguised herself as a man. She spent the rest of her time mooning over Aragorn. So...you may want to pick another example.

While I appreciate you stating that you will no longer attack folks who comment on my reviews, I do not appreciate you making such a statement in the same comment that contains insults directed towards them.

If you expect subjectivity and objectivity, you have to display the same.


Gregory Jensen You have to remember Peter Jackson had to add a female character to the hobbit to make a better movie, because there are none so Tolkien didn't really care about female characters


« previous 1
back to top