In contrast to Western art music, the dissonance-like sonorities in Schwebungsdiaphonie-cultures are at the core of the tonal structures. These cultures, although not abundant, are found in different locations all over the world (Cazden,...
moreIn contrast to Western art music, the dissonance-like sonorities in Schwebungsdiaphonie-cultures are at the core of the tonal structures. These cultures, although not abundant, are found in different locations all over the world (Cazden, Brandl, Messner, etc.). Sutartinės are a Lithuanian type of Schwebungsdiaphonie (Račiūnaitė-Vyčinienė, Ambrazevičius & Wiśniewska, etc.). On the one hand, the studies on psychoacoustic roughness and sensory dissonance are really big in number. The notions of roughness and sensory dissonance are usually considered as synonyms. On the other hand, it was proposed that ideal sounding of Schwebungsdiaphonie conforms to a maximum dissonance / roughness (Brandl, the diaphony in the Balkans and elsewhere; Ambrazevičius, the Lithuanian Sutartinės). In the present study, we analyze the occurrences of the notions of roughness and sensory dissonance in the psychoacoustic studies and define the case of Sutartinės in this context. The review of the experimental findings on the intervals corresponding to the maximum values of roughness / sensory dissonance reveals certain discrepancies between the concepts of roughness and sensory dissonance. It seems that, at least for a substantial frequency range, roughness is associated with larger interval sizes (Plomp & Levelt, Kameoka & Kuriyagawa, Terhardt, Zwicker & Fastl, Hutchinson & Knopoff, Vassilakis, etc.). Collation of these results and the findings of acoustical measurements of Sutartinė performances leads to the conclusion that the ideal vocal " clash " in Sutartinės most probably corresponds to psychoacoustic roughness, but not to sensory dissonance.