A psychiatrist narrates what at first appears to be a patient’s story, then a friend’s story involving a patient, that increasingly becomes his own story through his narrative choices. Are we then - as reader - an audience, a confidant, a...
moreA psychiatrist narrates what at first appears to be a patient’s story, then a friend’s story involving a patient, that increasingly becomes his own story through his narrative choices. Are we then - as reader - an audience, a confidant, a witness, perhaps the narrator’s own therapist? Patrick McGrath’s Asylum (1996) sets up these subject positions within the text, both as characters and as possible reading positions, and then blurs the boundaries. Bryan Fuller’s adaptation of Thomas Harris’s Hannibal Lecter novels, as the television show Hannibal (2013 -2015), develops the same technique. The entire third (final?) season of the series is devoted to psychiatrists and psychological profilers, who may also be murderers and lovers, debating agency, observation, participation, and responsibility. The focus of all this psychiatric narration is the same; sex and death.
This paper explores the disruption of genre and the text/audience dynamic in these fictions about analysis, analysts, adulterers, and murderers. Asylum reads like literary fiction; described by the New York Times as having ‘elegance and discretion’i it yet treats its audience like knowing connoisseurs of the gothic, and of horror. Fuller has declared, repeatedly, that Hannibal is not ‘television [but] a pretentious 80’s arthouse movie’. However, it opens with the structure and conventions of the serial investigative procedural. Form and function in these gothic works are analysed, exacted, and reconfigured, like the bodies of the victims, the psyches of the characters, and the perspective of the audience. Just who is taking whom to pieces?