Intuitiveness

University of Southern California, and the University of New Mexico. Rogers is particularly known for his book Diffusion of Innovations, published in l995 in its fourth edition. Rogers has conducted research projects on various aspects of the diffusion of innovations in Colombia, India, Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Brazil, Nigeria, and Tanzania, and in Iowa, Ohio, and Kentucky. He has taught in Germany, France, Mexico, Ecuador, Singapore, and Colombia. Rogers directs research on technology transfer from government R&D laboratories in New Mexico and Japan, the role of university-based research centers in creating and transferring technological innovations, and the role of research universities in technology transfer. Rogers is a Faculty Associate in the University of New Mexico's Center for Alcohol, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA), where he is involved in research on the effects of programs to prevent drunk driving in New Mexico, with emphasis on cultural factors in such behavior change.

Recent work in the cognitive science of morality has been taken to show that moral judgment is largely based on immediate intuitions and emotions. However, according to Greene's influential dual process model, deliberative processing not only plays a significant role in moral judgment, but also favours a distinctive type of content-a broadly utilitarian approach to ethics. In this chapter, I argue that this proposed tie between process and content is based on conceptual errors, and on a misinterpretation of the empirical evidence. Drawing on some of our own empirical research, I will argue socalled 'utilitarian' judgments in response to trolley cases often have little to do with concern for the greater good, and may actually express antisocial tendencies. A more general lesson of my argument is that much of current empirical research in moral psychology is based on a far too narrow understanding of intuition and deliberation.

Recently, some simulation systems of the building using Augmented Rarity (AR) have been proposed. In these systems, these are separated by interior simulation systems and exterior simulation systems, and two systems are independent respectively. Therefore, in performing the synthetic simulation of the buildings, the unification of two systems is required. In this paper, to satisfy a demand, we propose a system which seamlessly transfer between interior and exterior by expanding and shrinking AR object of the building. Thereby, we attempt to construct the intuitive and seamless synthetic system of the interior and exterior in a building. By the proposed system, we expect that we can intuitively and seamless simulate the synthetic simulation system of the building comparing with conventional simulation systems.

1. Einführende Gedanken ………………………....................………. 1
2. Acht Typen des (natur-) wissenschaftlichen Zufalls … 2
3. Zufall in den Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaften …..… 4
4. Zufall und Intuition ……………………………….......................….. 5
5. Beiträge aus dem Kongress …………………...............……….. 6
6. Rückblick …………………………………………............................….. 6

1) Welche Rolle spielt Intuition im Entwicklungsgang der einzelnen Wissenschaften,  was kann aus wissenschaftshistorischer und epistemologischer, also gewissermaßen externer Perspektive zur Intuition in den Wissenschaften gesagt werden?

2)   Was haben einzelne Wissensfelder und Wissenschaftsdisziplinen zur Intuition zu sagen? Welche Definitionen  bieten sie an? Wie sieht die sozusagen interne Perspektive aus, gibt es so etwas wie „angewandte Intuition“ in den Wissenschaften?

3) Kann Intuition eine Rolle als Bindeglied zwischen wissenschaftlichen und außerwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisformen und Vorstellungswelten spielen?

Intuition is the ability, without any time delay, to determine the causes of any and all effects regardless of the complexity of those effects. This intuition is a higher awareness, a deeper understanding, very much supported by our five senses of form and our two inner senses focused from the heart and crown energy centers. In this little book we explore earned, revealed and controlled intuition, recognizing that we have to take responsibility for our thoughts as well as our actions, for who we are as well as who we are becoming.
This is 13 th in a series of 22 short books, what we call Conscious Look Books, that are conversational in nature, taking full advantage of the reader's lived experience to share what can sometimes be difficult concepts. We live in a world that is tearing itself apart, where people are out of control and wanting to control others, rebelling from years of real and perceived abuse and suppression of thought. Yet, this chaos offers us as a humanity the opportunity to make a giant leap forward. By opening ourselves to ourselves, we are able to fully explore who we are and who we can become. With that exploration comes a glimmer of hope as we begin to reclaim the power of each and every mind developed by the lived human experience! These 22 concepts are part of the learning journey of which we are all a part, the Intelligent Social Change Journey (ISCJ). This is a developmental journey of the body, mind and heart, moving from the heaviness of cause-and-effect linear extrapolations, to the fluidity of co-evolving with our environment, to the lightness of breathing our thought and feelings into reality. Grounded in development of our mental faculties, these are phase changes, each building on and expanding previous learning in our movement toward intelligent activity. These little books share 22 large concepts from the Profundity and Bifurcation of Change (which is written from an academic viewpoint). Each book is independent and includes seven ideas offered for the student of life to help us become the co-creators that we are. These books, available in soft cover from Amazon, support idea exploration, class discussion, other discussion groups or can be used as special occasion gifts.

The advent of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle usually marks the dawn of “philosophy” as we know it nowadays. But what about those who came before Socrates, namely the presocratic philosophers? Can we take what survived from their words of wisdom-like writings to be philosophy? Moreover, could there be a ground or a context from which we can philosophically better understand their cosmogonies, i.e. the book of genesis of which some of them wrote his own version? In this paper, I aim to, firstly, give an account of how reason and rational philosophy has come to overshadow pre-Socratic philosophy as irrational. Secondly, I shall show how Nietzsche contributed to revealing the essential uniqueness and the aesthetical glamour of the intuitiveness, and irrationality, of the pre-Socratic philosophy. Thirdly, I will clumsily venture to give an example of how Nietzsche, while being able to listen to their drives, nimbly sways in a waltz dance while interpreting these intuitive men.