Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2023
The issue of terrorism is a matter panic in any society and country. Since it is shocking for a society thus for a country, it is a growing concern to study. However, there exists much controversy on how the terrorism is defined. Among various terrorist organizations based on religion, Hezbollah is most talked one and are exaggerating in the Middle-East and controversial as well being multi actor. Concerning these, this study tries to identify many sided nature and characteristics and the reason of its being controversial. In the later part, the writing includes justifications for their formation that are provided from their own viewpoints.
Revista Mundorama, 2018
Hezbollah has walked a long path since its emergence in 1982. What started as a terrorist organization that, apart from other objectives, was focused in overthrowing the Lebanese government by force, it has transformed itself into a terrorist organization that wants to achieve the same goal of taking control of the Lebanese government but through legitimate means from within the Lebanese political system. Hezbollah has become a hybrid terrorist organization, which acts on three spheres: first, the dawa, social welfare and religious education; second, the military-'resistance' jihad; third, the political sphere. These three spheres act in synergy, interconnected with one another. Hezbollah's maturation into a hybrid terrorist organization has happened throughout the years as a result of the combination of the following factors: ideology, popular base of support, leadership and the society in which it is inserted. .
from Their Origins in the Middle Ages To the End of the 19TH Century
Strategic Impact, 2021
Hezbollah (Allah’s Party) is a non-state actor that has a decisive influence on how political and security dynamics in Lebanon evolve but also manages to have an important impact on the evolution of the entire security complex in the Middle East. However, in order to understand the behavior of this actor, we must understand its main ideological landmarks. Thus, the research question which formed the basis of this study is: How the ideology assumed by Hezbollah leaders influenced the behavior of the organization? Through this study we aim to highlight the historical context of Lebanon during the ‘80s, as well as make an analysis of the main factors that determined the materialization of the Hezbollah organization; to understand Hezbollah’s main ideological pillars and how they influence the organization’s goals and actions; to examine how Hezbollah and Western states perceive each other; and to present the relationship between Iran and Hezbollah from the perspective of the motivation...
Four main sources enable us to understand the social and intellectual formation of Hezbollah’s incubator environment, and to understand what the Mahdawi (for Mahdi) doctrine encompasses: It groups the Shi’ites dreams of religious and political legitimacy, while having a theory of governance, and while it is backed by the practical doctrine of the Islamic Activism (Dynamism), which is a great support for its fulfillment in the Lebanese geography, and its goal of a Shi’a rule over this country by dismantling its state through a strong military group that makes the eagerness to power and the invocation of force, a standard for action, in a pure Maoist idea which replaces the economical contradiction with the authoritarian contradiction. This Mahdawi doctrine, supported by the practical doctrine, transforms Hezbollah into the “Army of Mahdi” under the seal of the Waliy Al-Faqih, where there is no difference if this party moved between combatting the Jewish opponent (and I stress on the word “opponent”, not enemy) to attain a lost honor, or scrambling in killing the Syrian enemy (and I stress on the word “enemy”, not opponent) as a revenge, or succumbing the Christian “infidel” as a sign of getting rid of deprivation. This is the psychological chrysalis in which Hezbollah puts itself and its unaware followers.
2001
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports,
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 2019
Pertanyaan mengenai apakah terorisme pada tiga dekade terakhir telah mengalami transformasi yang signifikan, merupakan salah satu isu yang memicu perdebatan dalam studi kekerasan politik dewasa ini. Di satu sisi, beberapa ahli yang mendukung adanya pendapat tentang terorisme baru mengatakan bahwa terorisme saat ini lebih berbasis agama, jauh lebih mematikan, mengalami perubahan besar dalam hal struktur organisasi, dan tidak lagi bergantung pada dukungan negara. Di sisi lain, beberapa ahli menolak ide tentang terorisme baru dan berpendapat bahwa yang ada selama ini hanyalah kontinuitas dalam aksi-aksi terorisme. Tulisan ini bertujuan mengklarifikasi perdebatan tentang 'terorisme baru' dengan melihat sejarah terorisme. Melalui sebuah investigasi historis, tulisan ini menemukan bahwa konsep terorisme baru secara tepat dapat menggambarkan karakter terorisme di masa ini. Namun demikian, dengan menelusuri beberapa peristiwa-peristiwa terorisme, tulisan ini juga menemukan bahwa karakter-karakter tersebut tidaklah sepenuhnya baru. Banyak dari ciri-ciri yang diklaim sebagai baru tersebut, ternyata memiliki banyak kesamaan dengan karakter terorisme di masa lalu. Kata kunci: terorisme, terorisme baru, motif, negara, struktur organisasi.
Criminal Justice Studies, 2003
Terrorism has a history that is at least 2000 years old. Although targets, victims, perpetrators, causes and justifications for the use of terror have changed, the methods of terrorism have remained the same throughout history. This article will review the developmental stages of terrorism to demonstrate that history defines terrorism as the use of violence to cause fear in order to force change in societal behavior or to force a society to acquiesce to the goals of the terrorist. The nature and history of terrorism will be reviewed from Roman occupation to modern militant Islamic terrorism.
The 2006 war in Lebanon was deemed inconclusive, but it marked the inability of the Middle East’s sole super power, Israel, from victory at the hands of a non-state actor, Hezbollah (Manyok, 11, and Blog 2013). In the West, Hezbollah has been deemed a terrorist organization with links to the purported rogue regime in Iran. Hezbollah constitutes a challenge to the already weak and fractured Lebanese state. Specifically, this paper will investigate the extent to which Hezbollah has decentered the Lebanese state because of its own network nature that has necessarily been employed due to its non-state actor status. First, John Herz’s analysis on the conditions that allowed for the early modern Westphalian state and two elements that could potentially lead to the downfall of the state, economic blockade and psychological warfare will be utilized. Second, Dan Deudney’s articulation of the ‘Kalashnikov revolution’ as an affront to Herz’s territorial hard-shell of impermeability will be analyzed with regards to Hezbollah’s ability to stockpile advanced weapons outside of the formally understood monopoly of the legitimate use of force over a given territory stated by Max Weber. Thirdly, Thomas Homer-Dixon’s grasp of the vulnerabilities of modern society and the ability for networked groups to burrow into the advanced technological interconnectedness in relation to Hezbollah’s ability to infiltrate use the existing system to finance their own affairs worldwide. Finally, utilizing Ralph Peters and William Rosenau’s understanding of modern military forces own intransigence toward urban warfare which in turn have only strengthened Hezbollah’s ability to protect and facilitate their continued role in the Middle East.
2012
for giving me a productive and supportive workplace. And my parents, Michael and Linda Mulhern, for giving me the parental support to finish this work. vi Abstract Low-intensity conflicts and insurgencies have been on the rise since the end of World War II. A particularly strong example of these conflicts is the ongoing conflict between the Lebanese Hezbollah and the state of Israel. In the course of the conflict, Hezbollah was able to accomplish what other, more powerful Arab states could not; Hezbollah forced Israel to unilaterally end a conflict. How did Hezbollah accomplish this? This thesis will provide a qualitative analysis of Hezbollah's use of the instruments of power in their irregular warfare strategy against Israel during the occupation of southern Lebanon.
Problemos, 2014
Historia Mexicana, 69, 2, Octubre-diciembre, 2019
Vigiliae Christianae, 2009
Journal of Lithic Studies, 2016
Mission in Crisis. The Church’s Unfinished Homework, 2024
Kent Akademisi, 2021
Public Archaeology, 2010
Drieduizend jaar bewoningsgeschiedenis van oostelijk Noord-Brabant Synthetiserend onderzoek naar locatiekeuze en bewoningsdynamiek tussen 1500 v.Chr. en 1500 n.Chr. op basis van archeologisch onderzoek in het Malta-tijdperk, deel 2
Derivas # 5, 2022
Historian, 2010
Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, 2019
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2017
Science Advances, 2018
Editorial QyDado, 2024
Scientometrics, 2018
Lecture notes in mobility, 2017